Skip to content

Archives for administration-leadership

See all posts in the network tagged with administration-leadership

EMS 12-Leads – The Standard of Care

3 comments

I’m going to make a statement:

Every ambulance in the United States should have the capability to obtain a 12-lead EKG. Regardless of the service’s level of care, be it Basic, Intermediate, or Advanced Life Support, every ambulance should have the ability to get a 12-lead. There are no exceptions in my opinion. It is the standard of care and every ambulance should be able to do it.

In the last few years, the 12-lead EKG has not only revolutionized EMS care, it has influenced the care given throughout the entire healthcare system. Bringing it to the forefront of urgent and emergency care has helped not only save countless lives but also has improved the ongoing quality of life for countless patients. The 12-lead EKG provides invaluable insight into a patient’s true underlying medical complaint and is useful in diagnosing a whole host of potential medical conditions. If you are an EMT or paramedic, you should be able to obtain a 12-lead.

I’m saying this because right now in communities both urban and rural there are ambulances that still do not have this essentially lifesaving capability. The problem crosses all divisions in the level of care and there is no excuse for this fact. Obtaining a 12-lead is an essential piece of the diagnostic puzzle for many patients. It can make the difference between a proper diagnosis and misdiagnosis that can have a lasting detrimental effect on a person’s entire life. There are many solid positive reasons that support EMS agencies expending their critical resources to obtain this capability and few, if any reasons for them not to.

If your agency does not currently have the ability to acquire a 12-lead EKG, here are some reasons that you can take to the powers that be for your service or use as information to show your community for fundraising activities. In my opinion, these things help show the solid reasons why you should begin offering the service as soon as possible.

  1. Better knowledge drives better medical care – The most common EMS treatments for chest pain can mask essential diagnostic signs and symptoms that help pinpoint cardiac causes of the complaint. Things like Nitroglycerine, Oxygen, narcotic analgesics, and aspirin can normalize the waveform complexes on an EKG tracing after only a few minutes. EMS providers used to begin treating the symptoms of chest pain before acquiring a 12-lead when the technology was not widely available. This caused a broad cross section of patients who were truly experiencing a heart attack that needed to be treated emergently to have 12-lead tracings that were normal upon their acquisition in the ER. The ERs then needed to rely on the laboratory values of the patient’s cardiac enzyme markers to make a diagnosis. This often times added 12 to 24 hours to a patient’s time to proper diagnosis and sometimes resulted in a heart attack that was missed entirely. EMS 12-lead EKG acquisition helps change that. EMS providers can obtain a symptomatic 12-lead EKG at a patient’s first point of entry to the healthcare system when their symptoms are at their worst which will oftentimes show diagnostic information that 12-leads obtained later in their care will not. This exponentially increases the diagnostic sensitivity of the overall assessment of a patient and can change their entire path of care, resulting in more appropriate treatment being given sooner. This can save more of the patient’s heart tissue and increase their quality of life for the rest of their life. In addition, proper care can decrease a patient’s length of hospital stay, saving millions in healthcare costs when viewed as a sum total.

 

  1. 12-lead EKGs increase the safety of EMS care – Certain types of heart attacks such as ones occurring on the front, underside, and the right side of the heart can cause nitroglycerine administration to be dangerous. EMS providers of all levels give nitroglycerine for chest pain. However, when given to a patient experiencing a right-sided, inferior, or anterior heart attack that affects the right ventricle of the heart, nitroglycerine can cause a severe drop in a patient’s blood pressure that can prove detrimental or even fatal for some patients. A 12-lead EKG can pinpoint these types of heart attacks with a fairly high degree of sensitivity and can help prevent the harmful drop in blood pressure. Heart attack victims need nitroglycerine and like all medicines that can be harmful when not properly used, EMS providers need to be able to see the 12-lead and share it with physicians at the receiving hospital to increase patient safety. Increased safety equals better patient care, decreased liability, and better patient outcomes overall.

 

  1. If you can provide oxygen, you can take a 12-lead – All paramedic ambulances should be able to obtain a 12-lead EKG with no exceptions, however so should all ambulances of any level. EMT-Basics and EMT intermediates functioning on an ambulance service of any level should be able to get a 12-lead. The first arriving care providers who will be beginning treatment on a potential heart attack victim need to be able to obtain a symptomatic 12-lead. While BLS and ILS providers cannot and should not interpret the 12-lead EKG and should not change their care based upon it (unless ILS protocols allow), they may transmit the information to the receiving hospital and/or responding ALS intercept and may act upon the orders they receive from their medical control. Obtaining the symptomatic 12-lead is essential for proper diagnosis of heart attacks. The first arriving care provider needs to get one, regardless of their level of care.

 

  1. It can determine the proper hospital to take a patient – Patients having heart attacks need hospitals that can take care of them. The current gold standard of heart attack care is generally agreed upon by physicians to be “Percutaneous Coronary Intervention” (PCI), also known as a “Cardiac Cath.” This is a surgical procedure where an interventional cardiologist threads a tool into the arteries that feed a patient’s heart through the vessels in their leg. The cardiologist can then open a blocked coronary artery and allow the area of the heart being damaged by the heart attack to receive blood flow again. The sooner this is done, the better. A symptomatic 12-lead EKG obtained by EMS can make the difference between a patient being transported to a patient where this surgery can be immediately performed rather than to a hospital that may not have this capability or does not have it immediately available. This makes the difference between immediately appropriate treatment that saves both lives and heart tissue and treatment that may not be the best for the patient. Inappropriate treatment costs a lot more money when it results in a patient needing transport from a facility that cannot properly care for them to one that does.

These are just some of the reasons that all ambulance services of any level should be able to obtain 12-lead EKGs in the field. It is an essentially lifesaving tool and is the standard of care. There are few, if any dangers or drawbacks to using the tool and multiple strongly supported reasons to do so. EMTs and Paramedics that do not currently have the capability should get it as soon as possible, and the communities that they serve should support them with the funding and resources to do so. The medical directors of communities where EMS 12-lead acquisition is not currently possible should write protocols for the practice and should support development of a system of care that properly uses the critical information obtained to make the most positive impact in patient care.

This is an area where EMS truly makes a documented, lasting impact in quality care and where EMS development is driving the healthcare system as a whole. Make sure your service and your practice is a part of it. Do the best by your patients and communities. Save more lives. Help more people get better.

If you have questions, I offer myself for any information you may need. My e-mail is proems1(at)yahoo(dot)com.

Posted by on April 23, 2012 • Filed under: Administration & Leadership, change, Command & Leadership, EKG, Emergency Medical Services, EMS, ems 2.0, EMS system, EMS Topics, new perspective, Paramedic, Patient Assessment, patient care, Patient Management, Scope of Practice, STEMI, Technology & Communications, Uncategorized

In Honor of National 911 Education Month – Help Spread the Word

No comments

Here is an article that I'd love for you to steal. Feel free to print this out and send it to your local newspaper in your (or your agency's) name. Help spread the message of the proper use of the 911 system and show your dispatchers some love. Remember, "National Public Safety Telecommunicators Week" is April 8th – 14th, 2012.

Here again, is the National Emergency Number Association's resource and education page

————————————————————————————-

It’s a crazy world out there.

Mayhem happens. Cars crash, buildings burn, people get sick and injured. We’re all guilty of doing some not-so-smart things every now and then. Usually we’re lucky and nothing happens, we skate by with hardly a thought to the consequences that might have been. However, sometimes it catches up with us. Sometimes those last second chances in traffic cause metal to crunch upon other metal; Sometimes we find out just how well the batteries in our smoke detectors still work; and sometimes we are shown just how fragile life really is. The human body is a masterfully crafted machine capable of doing everything we really need it to, but sometimes it stops working. Sometimes tires on semi-trailers blow while you’re passing them on the interstate. Sometimes your new baby has a seizure. Sometimes your spouse won’t wake up.

As I said: Mayhem, it happens.

While there isn’t anyone out there who would want to dwell on the unthinkable we all know exactly what we’re going to do when we’re faced with it. It’s ingrained into the fabric of American culture and is mostly the same anywhere you go. Everyone knows that when there is a serious risk to life, limb, sight, property, or safety you simply call 911.

“Nine-One-One.” It’s always pronounced that way. Those three numbers are said individually because people who panic over the situation they are calling about used to fumble in vain looking for an eleven key. Nine-One-One. We all remember it and reflexively know that it’s there. We know that someone will answer it and that they will help us when we need it. We know that help is just a phone call away. We know if we call and we really need them that police officers, firefighters, and paramedics will come and help us. We know it to be true and it provides a subconscious level of security for our entire lives. We don’t know what we’d do differently if it wasn’t there, but luckily we know that it is. It affects the American psyche in many ways and probably affects our culture in ways we’ve never studied. Nine-One-One. When we need it to be there, we really *need* it to be there.

April 8th through the 14th is “National Public Safety Telecommunicators Week” as part of the larger “National 911 Education Month.” Sponsored and celebrated by various groups as well as the National Emergency Number Association (www.NENA.org), the events help bring awareness to those who answer our pleas for help. They’re always there around the clock but most people hardly give these trained professionals a second thought. They toil in relative obscurity until we need them. We don’t think about them or the system they command until they’re the calm voice on the other end of the phone helping you deal with the unthinkable. When that happens they’re the most important persons in the world. We need them. They’re the lifeblood of public safety and the life line for everyone from the police officer in a shootout to the firefighter in a burning building to the husband doing CPR on his wife. They deserve our respect and there are a lot of us that quite literally owe them our lives.

There are some ways that you can help your local 911 system:

First: Learn how to dial 911. It sounds silly when you say it, but do you really know how to call it from every device you own? Can you call it from your Voice-Over-IP (Internet) phone? What about your iPhone or Droid? Do you know how to call it from home? From work? What about your kids? If you were unconscious could they figure out how to call 911 from your cell phone? Could they call it from school?

Second: Know how to give a correct location to the 911 operator. Even with the “Enhanced 911 system” that is supposed to provide location information to the dispatcher, your phone may not do it. Think about providing a clear location to 911. Teach your kids their address and their full names.

Third: Stay on the line. When you call 911 do not hang up first. Let the dispatcher end the call. There may be more information the dispatcher has to get from you. Responding emergency units may get lost and need directions on where to go. Every emergency dispatch is a carefully orchestrated series of events between various systems and groups. The fire department coordinates with the ambulance which coordinates with law enforcement and vice versa. The 911 dispatcher is the person who makes a lot of these decisions and has a lot to do in order to get things rolling. If they need information from you they will ask. If they don’t, they’ll end the call first. Please stay on the line and help give them all of the information they need.

Finally, learn CPR. Everyone should know it. 911 dispatchers are trained to give instructions over the phone to you on how to help in a medical emergency, but this is not a substitute for training on what to do. Learning CPR saves lives. Know it and be ready to perform it.

Think about the system and find ways to support the local 911 dispatchers. They don’t get hardly any credit for being the absolute lifesavers that they truly are.

Posted by on April 4, 2012 • Filed under: 911, Administration & Leadership, appreciation, Command & Leadership, Dispatch & Communications, Emergency Communications, EMS, EMS Dispatch, EMS Topics, Fire Dispatch, Fire Rescue Topics, Uncategorized

National 911 Education Month – What EMS can do

2 comments

If you're an EMS person, you should probably know that April is designated as "National 911 Education Month." It is sponsored by the National Emergency Number Association (NENA) and is dedicated to educating people about the proper care and feeding of the 911 system and the dedicated emergency telecommunicators that make the system run. The month spreads awareness of how to use the 911 system properly and culminates with "National Public Safety Telecommunicators Week." NENA has some great resources, including pre-made radio, web, print, and video PSAs, on their website: here.

I've always said that I am NOT cut out to be a dispatcher. I just don't think that I personally have the mental quickness, ability to multitask, or organizational skills it would take to be good at the job. As an EMS professional, I revere my dispatchers and show them as much love as I can. Dispatchers are the omnipresent bits of sanity in our daily schedules. We need to treat them well and give them equal respect. They do a terribly hard job and I salute them for it. You should too.

EMS professionals should celebrate National 911 Education Month as well as National Public Safety Telecommunicators Week just as much as we celebrate EMS week. We need to do this because well, can you imagine any potential benefits to educating the public about proper use of the 911 system? I think I can. Remember, it's not just about reducing nuisance calls that bog down the system; it's also about educating people when they absolutely need to call 911 because it's better medicine for them or better for society in general. I cringe when I see people who have legitimate medical problems that would benefit from EMS care drive themselves into the ER or even go untreated. It's our mission to help them and the first step is to spend time educating people when it is appropriate to call, without being condescending to those that call inappropriately.

Let's make the message as positive as we can people. We're professionals who care for others. Working EMS is a privilege and we need to remember that. I would rather go to 100 inappropriate calls than miss one single call where we could make a lifesaving difference.

In celebration of the month, I'm going to write a few pieces in honor of those that tell us where to go. I'm going to show some love to the voices in our radios and give you some tools to help spread the message at your own agencies. Tomorrow, look for a piece I've written that you can cut, paste, and send in to your local newspaper as a letter to the editor. Every little bit helps.

Posted by on April 2, 2012 • Filed under: 911, Administration & Leadership, Command & Leadership, Dispatch & Communications, Emergency Communications, Emergency Medical Services, EMS, EMS Dispatch, ems education, EMS Topics, Fire Rescue Topics, News, Technology & Communications

Coming Soon – The Law of Unintended Consequences meets the fire service

3 comments

Remember the post I put up a few days ago entitled “A Predatory Ambulance Fee”? It talked about how the Elgin, IL city council is planning to help recoup their costs for Fire and EMS services by charging for refusals.

(This is the link if you didn’t read it: “A Predatory Ambulance Fee”)

This just in:

Apparently they’re not done proposing new fees in the city. They seem to be very serious about recouping their costs and finding new ways to monetize their services. According to this article posted on Firefighter Nation, they’re planning on adding quite a few new fees to their repertoire.

Here’s the link: “Illinois Department Considers Charging Non-Residents for Fire Services” Read it and see what you think.

The article only mentions two specific fees, a $500 per hour fee for an engine response and $2200 for “a serious car accident where someone has to be transported by helicopter.” These fees are interesting enough, but the article also hints that there are further fees forthcoming.

The chief is quoted as saying that he expects most of these fees to be covered by insurance. After all, he says… that’s what insurance is for.

The chief may be very correct with that statement; insurance exists to pay for the unforeseen costs of bad things that happen to people who pay for it. Insurance companies pay these costs based upon rigid contracts they sign with their customers and charge their customers rates based upon the average risk they assume on behalf of the customer. They will only pay for what they are contractually obligated to pay for. While I have no knowledge of whether or not insurance will actually pay for the charges Elgin is proposing in practice, I’m assuming the city of Elgin doesn’t either and if they don’t seem to care whether the people they are saddling with these kinds of fees are insured for them or not, why should I?

It’s not like these insurance companies aggregate risk across all of their customers and will pass the overall cost of these fees to everyone in the area causing everyone’s insurance rates to go up, right?

Remember, I am not against fire departments, cities, and/or EMS services finding new and innovative revenue streams or ways to defray costs. The City of Elgin is not a villain here. It is very expensive to operate a service and I completely understand wanting to recoup some of those costs. These kinds of fees are somewhat the result of a rigid and over-regulated EMS payment system that chains our entire industry and squashes most hopes of innovation. I believe in EMS payment reform. In fact, I demand it.

But guys? While you’re by far not the only department in the US proposing and implementing things like this… you’re all opening Pandora’s Box. Your citizens are going to fight this, the press won’t be good, and you may end up creating more of a wave of dissatisfaction than you’re really prepared to endure. Think about Moline, IL and what they’re going through right now. Could you imagine their chances of winning their fight if they had implemented these fees?

Then again, perhaps they should implement them in Moline and let the revenue sources balance their budgets… In Moline they say they’re operating at over a $340,000 budget deficit and maybe these kinds of fees would offset that deficit enough that they could make their EMS financially viable.

Or maybe the marketplace will decide and departments that do this kind of thing will be put “out of business” (for lack of a better term) by competitive forces.

I would be willing to bet that there’s someone out there that would only charge $450 an hour for an engine response and only $2100 for a “serious car accident”. There are probably plenty of people and companies that would be happy to do fire response for profit. That’s what happens when governmental services start acting like monopolies in a capitalistic system, they get replaced by free market alternatives. Back in Ben Franklin’s day the fire service was a private endeavor that was only made public when the cost of providing protection wasn’t profitable enough to serve the ends the people wanted it to serve. Make the fire service profitable and private industry may find a way to make a solid business model out of it. Don’t believe me? Think Fed Ex and UPS versus the US Postal service.

I’m not saying it’s a good or bad thing. It’s why private industry exists. If there’s an opportunity to make money doing something, someone will step up to make money doing it. These fees, if they become lucrative, may just be the opportunity for private industry to find a business model that didn’t exist before.

I am able to understand why Elgin wants to implement these fees… but I think that this is a situation ripe for the Law of Unintended Consequences. If I could give cities proposing these kinds of fees some advice I would tell them they should find every single efficiency within their existing budgets before they set about increasing revenue through raising fees. Make no mistake, within the contemporary political climate; citizens are going to scrutinize every aspect of your budget when you start trying to get them in the wallet. You may not like what they find.

I don’t have the ultimate answer but I’m keeping an eye on this story. You should too.

Posted by on November 4, 2011 • Filed under: 911 fail, Administration & Leadership, ckemtp rants, Command & Leadership, Economics, Emergency Medical Services, EMS, ems 2.0, EMS Management, EMS Topics, fire, Fire department, Fire Rescue Topics, Firefighting Operations, Funding & Staffing, News, northern illinois, politics

A Predatory Ambulance Fee?

14 comments

I just read an article on JEMS.com that's got me concerned. Since I'm a blogger, I thought that I'd share it with you. It's kind of what I do.

The article concerns a city in Illinois that wants a fee increase for their fire-based ambulance service. At first it looked like just another city wanting to increase its charges for providing transports. That’s hardly newsworthy for ambulance services in Illinois these days as they’re mostly all trying to recoup more expenses.

However, read the story and try and see if you see what I saw: “Ambulance Fees May Jump 25% in Elgin”.

It’s way at the bottom. Did you see it?

Here’s what sets me off:

“A new charge for refusing advanced life support upon the arrival of emergency responders also is proposed. For nonresidents, the charge would be $400 each time. For residents, the charge would be $300 after the third occurrence in a 12-month period.”

A new charge for refusals? According to this if you’re not a resident of the city, have a minor fender bender that someone calls an ambulance for, and sign a refusal of care form, you’re going to get a $400 bill. What if it’s not auto-related and you slip and fall on some ice and someone calls? Is that worth $400 if you’re not hurt and an ambulance shows up? This sounds to me like every time someone plays "Cell phone hero" and calls 911 for something where nobody is hurt the service is going to get paid. Sure, it'd be nice for the ambulance service… but I don't think it's fair to the poor people getting the bill.

What about if you see an ambulance down at the local coffee shop and they ask you how you’re feeling… is that worth $400 too if they ask you for your autograph?

This is not fair.

I can see what they’re probably trying to do. They’re probably trying to crack down on their system abusers by making them financially responsible. I support a lot of those efforts if they’re well thought out. This one is not. This isn't neccesarily a case where someone is getting something for free and should be charged for it. According to the article, this fee would apply to all refusals of care regardless of whether or not any services were provided. 

I am a fan of treating and releasing patients in certain circumstances and I've written a few published articles on the topic, like this one regarding treatment coverage for hypoglycemic diabetics we sweeten up then sign off, and also this one that covers a procedure that I call the "Enhanced Refusal". I agree that both of those circumstances should be covered by a fee. I believe that if EMS provides a necessary service to someone that we should be able to recoup our costs and make it worth our time. This is not one of those cases.

Think of it this way. This is akin to you telling your neighbor you think your air conditioner is on the fritz in a casual conversation. Your neighbor, being a helpful person calls a heating and air conditioning contractor without your knowledge.  The contractor shows up at your house to your surprise, and when you tell him your air conditioner is just fine and you don't need any repairs he charges you $400 for his time.

You'd be outraged and wouldn't pay it.

Of course I know that this most probably is not the line staff proposing this change. This one has all of the hallmarks of some uninformed bureaucrat all over it.

I will not be signing one of that ambulance service’s refusal forms. I suggest you don’t either.

Is anyone else doing this?

Posted by on October 28, 2011 • Filed under: 911 fail, Administration & Leadership, Command & Leadership, Emergency Medical Services, EMS, EMS Topics

The Houston Medicare Problem – Formulating Better Instructions on Paying for EMS

1 comment

I’ll admit it. I’m kind of a nerd with Microsoft Excel.

I don’t have the programming skills needed for other database programs and I’m only taking baby-steps in MS Access, but with Excel I’m pretty darn good at making it do cool things. I think Excel is widely underused for being as powerful of a data analysis tool as it is. It’s one of those programs that everybody knows how to use… but nobody *knows* how to use. People learn parts of it and are able to do the kind of work that they do in it without touching the thousands of other tools that it offers them. It’s an insanely powerful system.

I use Excel quite a lot in my various jobs for data aggregation and analysis. Lots of my coworkers do too. Since most everyone knows that I’m an Excel nerd, some people ask me to help troubleshoot their spreadsheets for them. Some problems are quick fixes while others are maddeningly complex. Most problems, however, seem to have a common theme:

Computers always do what we TELL them to do but not necessarily what we WANT them to do.

Computers run programs. They don’t think for themselves. They don’t make their own instructions. They simply look at a list of instructions and run them. They don’t judge the instructions for merit, correctness, or morality (See: 99.9999% of the internet), they just do what they’re told without being able to think about it. When computers appear to be thinking, they’re simply running complex programs with multiple variables. Excel is no different. In fact, excel is very good at doing exactly what we tell it to do with no regard to what we may want it to do.

I sometimes agonize for hours on Excel problems when I can’t get my numbers to add up correctly. Usually these problems involve complex groups of numbers where I know the answers for a certain part of the problem, but want to use Excel to contain and crunch numbers for the parts I don’t know. I’ll write my calculations on what I know already to prove my theory, and then use those theories to expand the spreadsheet. Sometimes the formulas work the first time… and sometimes they don’t. When fixing the problems I have to keep reminding myself that Excel is doing exactly what I told it to do, not what I’m thinking I want it to do. If it’s giving me the wrong answer, it’s because I asked it the wrong question or gave it bad instructions on how to arrive at the answer. It can’t do anything but that.

I use Excel as a metaphor for a lot of systems in life. To be sure, humans have free will (we think) and are very complex in both our actions and motivations, but on the larger scale our systems affect our behaviors in predictable patterns. Just like we predictably follow the lines on the highway when we’re driving most of the time, with the outliers among us creating a need for EMS, our systems affect us predictably. Small changes to the systems we operate within can cause big changes to our behaviors on the large scale. Think of a small change to the width of a highway traffic lane causing more or less accidents, or daylight savings time creating savings in energy costs overall. While there will always be outliers when dealing with humans… the systems we create are instructions that society is given. Society will follow those instructions for both the benefit and detriment of our goals. The overall system will do just what Excel does, by doing what we tell it to do and not necessarily doing what we wanted it to do when we created it.

This Headline out of The Houston Chronicle made me think of this. Take a look at it:

“Private ambulances take Medicare, taxpayers for a ride – Companies make millions off the poor, vulnerable – whether passengers need services or not”

I want you to read the article when you have time (it’s a long one – here’s the link) but the salient point they assert is that unscrupulous private EMS organizations, in near criminal collaboration with the operators of unscrupulous “healthcare” organizations, are bilking Medicare for millions via unnecessary ambulance transports. According to the pretty well-written article there does indeed seem to be a problem. While I don’t like the fact that in my opinion, the article unfairly vilifies some of these ambulance services and shows a bias against private EMS providers as a whole, I can’t say if it’s my own stated bias as a proponent of well-ran private EMS that’s causing me to feel that way. However, even the headline “Private ambulance services take Medicare, taxpayers for a ride” shows a bias. My thought is that the headline should read “Medicare Rules allow people to take advantage of the system although most don’t” but I digress…

I would like you to look at the headline of an article I wrote recently that JEMS.com published as my April column, it reads:

“Medic Suggests Reimbursement Change – A different payment model helps EMS & Medicare”

In his article which includes references to Barbecue, I talk about the Medicare reimbursement rules as well, but from a different perspective. (Here’s the link if you haven’t read it). I offer a solution on how a small change to the Medicare rules (think: the instructions) could benefit all involved.

I think that the two extremes here show a poignant contrast. One extreme shows how the Medicare system can be abused due to its rules allowing for abuse and the other shows how the system can disallow beneficial services because of those same rules. It is a good example of how just like excel, the system does what we tell it to do rather than what we want it to do. Other than some unscrupulous people out there, nobody wants patients or ambulance services (*ahem* Private or otherwise) to be able to take advantage and get money in a way that is unfair to the rest of the system. However, I think there are few people out there that would rally against the change that I propose in my article. This is simply a case of the end result being a product of system design. Medicare, like any system, is a set of instructions that produce an end result. The instructions allow for the ambulance services in Texas to bilk the system in compliance with the rules while a different section of those same instructions disallow payment for treating and releasing patients who could clearly benefit. It’s simply a matter of the Medicare system producing results based upon the instructions it’s been given. In both cases, the system isn’t making a judgment, it’s just following the instructions it’s been given. There is no moral value assigned within the system.

Small, efficient changes need to be made here. Just like when troubleshooting an excel spreadsheet the smallest error in a formula can skew the whole result. The companies mentioned in the Houston article aren’t the product of private EMS being evil they’re the unintended result of a system that needs better instructions to act upon. The system is producing what we’ve told it to produce, not what we want it to. These problems wouldn’t exist if we would tweak the parameters of the system to disallow them.

So… what we need are some better instructions. Anyone got any ideas?

Here’s the link to the Houston Chronicle article again

Here’s the link to mine

Also, for more of my column on JEMS.com, here’s my page there with all of my articles listed.

Posted by on October 24, 2011 • Filed under: Administration & Leadership, Command & Leadership, Economics, Emergency Medical Services, EMS Management, EMS Topics, News, newspaper, Paramedic, politics

Get a Pulse, Get a Steak? Random Incentive

2 comments

Tonight the girlfriend and I had the rare opportunity to go out on an actual date. It's getting increasingly rare these days that we have time to do so, what with our schedules, work stuff, and my recent bit of travelling for the other job that I have. It was nice to actually get out, go to a restaurant, and not have to cook or eat bad-for-me fast food on the road.

She and I went to one of our favorite places, a midwestern type joint that specializes in mass quantities of beef. At this place you get to choose a large hunk of absolutely beautiful red meat from their cooler, season it to your liking with the wide variety of spices they have on hand, and then grill it yourself over their huge charcol grill while people bring you your beer. It is a concept that is admittedly getting a little more rare around the midwest, but it's certainly something that I haven't seen anywhere else in the country that I've been. These people have given their customers exactly what they want. All the beef one could possibly eat, a salad bar to go with it, cheap drinks, and a good meal will cost you about $17 bux. Yeah, beat that, California.

I noticed on the menu that the restaurant offers gift cards that employers can give their employees. They are good for a full meal for two and come personalized for the employer. Since I'm always on the lookout for a good way to help reward and motivate good EMS people, I mentioned to the GF that maybe I should buy a couple to give the guys as an occasional "attaboy".

"What would you give them out for?" She asked, then answered "How about every time they resuscitate a code?"

Now THAT is a good idea! I'll call it the "Get a Pulse, Get a Steak" incentive program. That way, every time a crew gets that magical cardiac arrest save they and their significant other get to celebrate by roasting them some posthumous cow. It sure beats knowing that all you've got to look forward to is a lengthy report and a horribly messy ambulance or scene to clean up afterward.

Then again, I'm sure someone will point out that it's just too subjective to base the reward on a code save because as we all know, even when everything is done completely "right", completely by the book, and the crew tries absolutely as hard as they can to get the save it still doesn't usually turn out the way we'd like it to. We all know that is true. It just seemed like a good idea at the time.

Thanks for shooting down my awesome idea, imaginary naysayer.

I've been trying to come up with some innovative ways to motivate, reward, and incentivise the best and brightest EMS people out there to want to come in and do the absolute best job they can for the service and the patients every day over the long term. Money and passion isn't enough to carry everyone along every day, people need more than that sometimes and there's simply no shame in it because we all feel that way at times.

I'd love to hear what you or your service is doing to motivate employees. (And don't tell me it's what they're doing in Louisville, because yeah… not cool)

Also, the steak was amazing.

Posted by on October 14, 2011 • Filed under: Administration & Leadership, appreciation, Command & Leadership, Emergency Medical Services, EMS, EMS Health & Safety, EMS Management, EMS Motivation, EMS Topics, EMT, Paramedic

A Medic Roast in Tennessee

20 comments

Some time ago I worked for a service that had a governing board made up of community members from various walks of life. Most of them were business leaders around the area and only one or two of them had any EMS experience. One day I overheard one of the board members talking about problems he was having with the quality control at a factory his company ran in another area.

I was fascinated.

It seems that the workers at this factory just didn’t seem to care about the quality of the product they created. Products came out with grievous manufacturing errors that turned a lot of their finished products into unsellable junk. He described these errors as things that any reasonable person would notice had they spent more than one day on the job.

Joining in the conversation, I asked him “So, how much does the average worker at that factory get paid?”

He replied with a wage that was actually above my hourly rate as a paramedic. It was significantly more, actually.

It shocked him when I said “So they make that much more than I do, and when I make a mistake someone dies and my career is over? That doesn’t seem right at all”

And no, it doesn’t seem right. Every human being on this planet is going to screw something up on occasion. We’re not perfect. Medical professionals and especially EMS people are constantly challenged to adapt their knowledge to unfamiliar situations with incomplete information. On top of that, the body of our knowledge is constantly changing and it’s up to us to know exactly how to seek it out so we’re consistently doing the best for our patients. It’s not easy to be a good EMT or Paramedic and it’s a responsibility that we’re largely not well-paid for. Top that with the fact that even one simple mistake can be a career ender and…

You get this article that I saw this morning in JEMS: Tennessee Paramedic Demoted after Drug Mistake

If you’ve been a paramedic in the field for any length of time and this article doesn’t scare you, you’ve not been much of a paramedic for any length of time. This is real folks. This is something we all should sit up and take notice to.

The article concerns a paramedic who made a medication error. While it doesn’t state what error he made, it seems that he had mixed a medication in a bag of normal saline and infused it to a patient while intending to give a different medication. The article doesn’t specify the medications given but from the patient’s condition an educated person may be able to infer what they were. It also specifically does not mention the condition of the patient before or after the medication was given, leading me to believe that the patient suffered only minor ill. Yes, I know that I’m assuming… but you can’t tell me that the newspaper wouldn’t have been more than happy to blast the headline “MAN DIES AFTER MEDIC POISONS HIM WITH WRONG MEDICATION” if he had died. My guess is that if they downplayed his condition, there wasn’t much to sensationalize about it.

The medic, who had been with the service for 9 years and who had only been disciplined once in that time for missing something on a rig check, had received “above average performance reviews” and more than one commendation in his tenure.

From reading the article, it looks like an experienced medic made an honest mistake. He was reprimanded for it, suspended for 28 days, and demoted to an EMT.

Yeah, you read that right. They voided 3 years of education that this man had completed and knocked his license all the way to EMT-Basic.

They did this for one mistake. One mistake that even the medic’s chief stated was “… accidental and an oversight on his (the medic’s) part”. An honest mistake that everyone reading this article has already made or will probably make in their career. A mistake that was apparently easy to make, even by an experienced paramedic that most probably did not result in grievous harm to anyone.

If the facts truly are as reported in the article and there are no other unreported wrinkles to this case, I call shenanigans. The discipline this medic received simply does not fit the crime. It’s too heavy-handed. The discipline seems arbitrary, unnecessary, and patently unfair.

The chief was quoted in the article as saying that their agency, which is reported as responding to around 29,000 emergency calls each year, has a “success ratio” of “100%” and that “this is not the norm.”

So he’s saying that the all of the EMTs and Paramedics that must handle 29,000 emergency calls per year are expected to be 100% perfect 100% of the time or he will negate their education, harm their lifetime income potential, and defame them in the national press? I know that he probably didn’t *intend* to say that… but he very much did say it. I know of no other single profession that has so much at stake every time they go to work. To my knowledge, no other profession has so much risk of long term harm to their lives, their family, and their professional career riding on a very much unrealistic goal of being 100% perfect 100% of the time. It’s shockingly unfair… and terrifying. No human being can maintain those expectations. We’re just not able to always be perfect all of the time for an entire career.

And when you think that the pay for Paramedics and EMTs in this country is by and large pathetically low, you might wonder why anyone would ever consider doing the job at all.

I’ll say again, if the facts in this case are accurate and complete as reported, this is an outrage. It’s an abomination. It’s enough to generate national attention about the unfair working conditions and haphazard disciplinary standards that EMS must endure.

I’ll say this too: I support this paramedic and formally place a letter in the file of the agency responsible for doing this to him.

(This part is for Google) If you work for WRCB TV in Tennessee, please feel free to consider this my opinion.

(You can find the original article HERE: http://www.wrcbtv.com/story/15463233/ems-used-wrong-iv-in-melvin-davis-transport)

Posted by on September 15, 2011 • Filed under: Administration & Leadership, Command & Leadership, Emergency Medical Services, EMS, EMS ethics, EMS Health & Safety, EMS rant, EMS Topics, Ethics, News, Paramedic, patient care, Patient Management

Enhanced EMS Refusals? Read this, then look for more

2 comments

Howdy everyone!

Yep, I’ve been quiet for a while, but that’s because I’ve been busy doing… um… doing, uh… Doing stuff that you’ll be hearing about later. Don’t worry about me though, because I’m certainly not going anywhere.

A while ago I came up with an idea for what I call the “Enhanced EMS refusal” and it’s an idea that I think EMS could start using tomorrow that would be a big step in ushering in EMS 2.0. I wrote about it in my August column on JEMS.com

Here’s the link on JEMS.com:  “Paramedic Uses Enhanced Patient Refusals” – Chris Kaiser NREMT-P

Look for more on this coming up on the blog, I have a lot to expand on the idea, including sample policies and documentation.

Good to be back, y’all.

Posted by on August 25, 2011 • Filed under: Administration & Leadership, Emergency Medical Services, EMS, ems 2.0, EMS Topics

What Does “Brotherhood” mean?

12 comments

I read an article yesterday in the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel that unfortunately, didn't surprise me all that much. It regards a professional, career firefighter who chose to opt out of his union due to his political beliefs. He's a conservative, and due to his stance on the political causes championed by the union, he's decided to take his money elsewhere and invoke a little-used "Fair Share" legal clause that allows him to drop his union membership and only pay pro-rated dues for his share of the collective bargaining. He does not pay for the union's wider political activities.

And this? Well, actually I can support it. He's voting with his feet based upon his beliefs. I respect anyone of strong conviction that truly does what they believe to be right. I like that, in fact… no matter a person's political spectrum (Well, almost no-matter their political spectrum)

I rarely talk about politics here, but this case is different. It seems this firefighter has constructed a float commemorating his brothers who died in the Sept. 11th, 2001 attacks and wants to run it in the local Racine, WI 4th of July parade.

The union thugs (Yea, I said "Union Thugs". That's what they are) have issued a fatwah barring any union firefighter from riding on or marching with the float in the parade. They won't comment further on the issue. They just don't want to support the "fair share" firefighter.

Here's the article, you should read it yourself "Firefighters' Union Throws Cold Water on 9/11 float"

As I said, I am not at all surprised by this. I'm still saddened, though. It makes me think it's time for me to pull out my favorite Paul Combs political cartoon.

Kind of says it all, doesn't it?

————————————————————

Also on another note,  did you read my last monthly JEMS column on Ambulance Service Disaster preparedness? You really should:

http://www.jems.com/article/major-incidents/ems-agency-plans-natural-disasters

 

 

Posted by on July 3, 2011 • Filed under: Administration & Leadership, ckemtp rants, Emergency Medical Services, EMS, EMS ethics, EMS Topics, Fire department, Fire Rescue Topics

Perils of Paramedics Pursing imProper Patient Refusals

7 comments

Inspector General Faults DC Paramedic’s Response to ‘Acid Reflux’ Case

This article comes to us from JEMS.com which has a link to the full article over at The Washington Times. It’s not necessary to read both articles, but since JEMS originally called it to my attention it’s only fair to link the boys over there first. Read the full article, please… I want to see if you feel the same way about it that I do.

Ok, ya back? Good.

In this case that is very reminiscent of the case law I wrote about last year in “EMS Case Law – AMA Refusals, Death, and Documentation” – A DCFD EMS paramedic obtained a signed refusal from a patient who called 911 for chest pain. According to the < sarcasm> stellar, just friggin’ stellar < /sarcasm> journalism employed in the story by the reporter (I mean seriously, can any reporter anywhere ever write a story about EMS that doesn’t sound like a 5 year old’s understanding of Mozart?) the Evil paramedic did bad things that caused someone to die.

And, well… Here are some quotes from the piece, although I still think you should read the whole thing:

“The crew found Givens, 39, on the floor of his home after his mother called 911 — “an indication that he may have experienced something more serious than what was later described as simple acid reflux,” the report says.

Although they asked Givens multiple times whether he wanted to be taken to a hospital and he declined, the report suggests responders should have done more to persuade him to go.”

So they find some guy, a 38yo guy, a young guy who lives with his mother (maybe) laying on the floor probably being all dramatic and stuff… I’m sure he was all like “Ow. My chest hurts” and the medics were all like “Dude, we have a low index of suspicion for your condition being cardiac related due to the fact that you’re young and don’t appear to have many risk factors” n’ stuff.

Or something like that. At any rate, I’m sure they were less concerned about this guy than they would have been with say, a middle-aged male with classic STEMI (heart attack) symptoms. Yes, they signed him off AMA while telling him to take Pepto-Bismol, and yes… the article does indeed say this:

“The inspector general’s report also faults emergency workers for not recording fundamental information, such as Givens’ first name, age and medical history and interactions with his family members on a patient care report. The reports are typically passed on to hospital personnel when a patient is taken to a hospital but are considered necessary even in cases in which a patient is not taken to a hospital to provide medical and legal documentation of responder’s actions.”

But that doesn’t mean that they just plain didn’t care about the guy and were encouraging the refusal, right?

“When Givens asked one of the four emergency workers who responded if he needed to go to the hospital, the responder replied, “That’s up to you; if you want to go we will take you,” according to the report.”

Yea… I’m just going to come out and say that the only time I ever use that line is at 0330hrs when I’ve been called out for a stubbed toe in the winter time and I am actively encouraging the AMA.

But this can’t be a systemic problem with the whole administration of the DC Fire Department EMS division, can it? I mean… that’s one of the nation’s busiest fire-based EMS providers and I’m sure they care a great deal about EMS and give it the full attention it deserves.

“A 2009 investigation by The Washington Times into the training and education of the District’s paramedics found many could not pass basic written exams testing their medical knowledge or that they mishandled basic life-saving procedures during videotaped assessments.

The test results of the paramedic who treated Givens were among those criticized by experts in the report by The Times, and the lawsuit filed by the Givens family accuses the fire department of being aware of the paramedic’s “poor performance” but leaving him in the field.”

Um… but that was in 2009! And I’m sure that the DC Fire Department EMS Division has progressed greatly in improving their EMS care and service delivery, right?

DC BLS Ambulances out of service as Hot Weather Arrives

<sigh>

I will admit, there isn't enough information or proof here to make a decision on due to the *amazing* clarity of the reporting here. I'll admit that I read between the lines when I made my judgement and then pulled back from my original thoughts. Then again, it does seem like my worries about this case are correct… I don't know exactly what the truth is, but I'm guessing it's not favorable for DC Fire EMS.

Excuse me, I mean "FEMS."

<sigh>

—————————————————————————–

Have you ever read my post on the ultimate, most off-limits “no go” topic in EMS blogging? It might tick you off as well.

 

Posted by on June 17, 2011 • Filed under: Administration & Leadership, Case law, Command & Leadership, Emergency Medical Services, EMS, EMS Management, EMS rant, ems report, EMS Topics, everyday ems ethics, Fire Rescue Topics, Paramedic, training-fire-rescue-topics

Death Rate to Increase in London – and – The Medicare Tomato

4 comments

Howdy everyone!

I’ve read some things out there on the interwebs lately that I’d like to share with y’all. These are articles that made me think. They also made me feel a certain way after I read them. Individually, they would have been interesting on their own merits. However, when read together one after another, I think they do something to your brain that you should experience.

And let me just say, good luck with this.

First off, I read this post by Rogue Medic that linked to this post by BryanKellet.net entitled “Death Rate in London to Increase”.

As always, Rogue Medic has provided his genuinely valuable insight to the article and I am very much glad he called it to our collective attention. I suggest you read the original post first and then read the Rogue’s interpretation on it. While you’re at it, be SURE to read each and every one of the comments on Mr. Kellet’s article. Read them all, it’s very telling.

Including this one:

"560 frontline cuts is a huge number and your comments with regards to little yellow cars is spot on. Time to start investing in private healthcare company shares perhaps."

Uh huh.

It looks like the London Ambulance service is cutting 560 paramedics from their staff, decreasing available ambulances, and is shifting the focus to Rapid Response cars with a single-medic. While these cuts would be common-place in American cities these days (except of course, for the Rapid Response Cars); doesn’t the NHS support the LAS? Wouldn’t they be fully reimbursed for their care? I thought they had a well-funded healthcare system over there across the pond. 

Then read this fascinating look at universal healthcare written by The Happy Hospitalist and posted on his site about a year ago: The Medicare Tomato – It is just an absolutely fantastic article that you need to read, now.  If you’re not convinced, read this quote from the piece:

“A consumer came in today at 12:04 pm on March 7th, 2008. He did not complain of any tomato headache. He had no gas pains. He appeared to be in good spirits. He was not orange. His lips were drooling for a chance at free tomatoes. He appeared angered at the lack of options and declining quality. He was at one point found to be pointing and yelling profanities. He took 7.4 pounds of the super duper genetically altered tomatoes (verified by government scales) with a big fat giant grin on his face, yelling, "I ain't paying for it", all the way out the door.”

This guy’s one of us.

I’m withholding comments of a political nature right now. While I have strong feelings on the looming changes in US healthcare and the economy in general, I want to foster the discussion and see a broad cross-section of opinions in the comments section. I want to know what y’all think.

However, if you would like to read some of my articles on what my opinion is, feel free:

 

I’m not picking on my British EMS brethren here. I like the boys in green quite a bit, like my friend Insomniac Medic and @ukmedic999. To prove it, here’s some of my writing on the whole UK thing and how it’s good, too.

A Shoutout Across the Pond to our British EMS Brethren

Posted by on June 15, 2011 • Filed under: 911 fail, Administration & Leadership, Emergency Medical Services, EMS, EMS Health & Safety, EMS Topics, Paramedic, UK paramedics, united kingdom, universal healthcare, US economy

From the #WTF files – AL Fire Chief Flushes Twins down the Toilet?

7 comments

Holy crap! Read this: Odenville, AL Fire Chief Terminated  FireLawBlog.com

Did I read that correctly? Did a Fire Chief really FLUSH TWO STILLBORN TWINS DOWN A TOILET!?

No way, that's gotta be a hoax… I mean, that can't happen, right? Please tell me that nobody is that stupid. Please restore at least a little of my faith in humanity…

Nobody? <sigh>

FireLawBlog.com's story on this has a link to the St. Clair Times article on the subject, and it looks like there's a lot more to this story than has been reported. The comments on the article are pretty telling… although I still have very little idea on what actually went on here. At face value, I can't see any possible reason that this would have happened. I just don't understand. Maybe if she miscarried into the commode maybe? I suppose they *could* have missed them… right?

Eww.

Also, the former chief defended himself with this cryptic statement, which I've seen repeated three times in various articles on the story:

"There were two of us there, and we followed protocol,” Davis said. “We followed the state protocol issued by the medic who was in charge at the scene.”

Soooo… Um… The medic… issues state protocol? and he/she ordered this? Aaaannnd… I'm sorry I just don't understand the statement. Maybe it's a bad quote, I don't know.

Anyway, here's the followup story. I just thought I'd call it to your attention.

http://firelawblog.com/2011/06/alabama-fire-chief-sued-over-disposal-of-stillborn-twins/

 

 

Posted by on June 8, 2011 • Filed under: Administration & Leadership, Command & Leadership, Emergency Medical Services, EMS Management, EMS Topics, Fire Rescue Topics, News, Paramedic

Wake Up! You may have a call…

2 comments

Every so often the discussion of the most healthy and appropriate way to wake a sleeping firefighter or EMS person from their slumber in order to alert them to the presence of a call for service crops up in the national discourse. Some believe that soft, gradiated lighting combined with a soothing tone and soft-voices is best for the long-term cardiovascular health of EMTs, Firefighters, and Paramedics. They say that a quick wake up to a jarring alarm tone is unhealthy and can cause long-term damage through a rapid increase in heart-rate and blood pressure.

I think it's BS, actually. I can't seem to get up without the assistance of Gabrial's trumpet, a car battery, and some alligator clips… and even then, I have woken up more than once in the middle of a call, coming to fully-realized alertness in the act of performing CPR or decompressing someone's chest. I think that that's way more startling. Also, our night dispatcher has a voice that would be very well suited to that of a 900-number call-taker and isn't the kind of voice that tends to make a guy want to get *out* of bed. ("Tell me more about the fire, Dave!")

While searching the world's most accurate source of information, the internet, I came across this invention. I love it. I may try and buy the rights to it and sell it to ambulance agencies such as mine.

Here, see for yourself!

In addition, I think this would be an awesome way to get the crews to do their shift chores. The supervisor of the day would keep the machines on until the garbage cans were emptied, the floors were mopped, the toilets were clean, and the training was trained.

I think it's a potential gold mine.

Posted by on May 23, 2011 • Filed under: Administration & Leadership, Emergency Medical Services, EMS, EMS Health & Safety, EMS Humor, EMS Management, EMS Motivation, EMS safety, EMS Topics, Fire department, Fire Rescue Topics, Firefighter Safety & Health, funny, Paramedic, Videos

Change Medicare? Save EMS

9 comments

I’ve said this before, and I’ll continue to say it until I can do something about it: The Fee-For-Transport model has failed EMS. We have to change it and we have to change it soon.

In fact, I believe that the entire revenue model we use for our industry has failed. I think that the “Fee for Transport” model employed by the Emergency Medical Services industry is flawed, archaic, outdated, and is not conducive for the development of our profession. I think it stifles growth and development. I think that it is unfair to make this inequity up through local property taxes.

I think it has to change.

Don’t know what I’m talking about? Let’s hear what Medicare has to say on the subject:

“The Medicare ambulance benefit is a transportation benefit and without a transport there is no payable service. When multiple ground and/or air ambulance providers/suppliers respond, payment may be made only to the ambulance provider/supplier that actually furnishes the transport.” (https://www.cms.gov/manuals/Downloads/bp102c10.pdf)

Yes, that’s what that means: Medicare sees EMS solely as a “transport provider.”

Basically Medicare is saying that all they’re going to pay for is taxi service. Sure, they’ll reimburse some other expenses, but without the taxi component, they’re not picking up the tab. They’re certainly not going to pay for you to provide medical care for one of their clients on a scene. They’re not going to pay you for sweetening up an unresponsive diabetic and leaving them at their house, they’re not going to pay you for providing Community Paramedicine, and they’re certainly not going to pay you for other home health or primary care services. To them, we’re a medical transport industry. They pay for transportation and that’s it. Sure, they make a differentiation between “Emergency” transportation and “Non-Emergency Transportation” and use the term “skilled medical treatment” for some of the things done in the back of our rigs, but that whole “transportation” thing is always there. No transport, no payment. It’s as simple as that.

This very appropriate image was sent in to me by Matthew Rausenberg while I was writing this post. Thanks Matt!

Not sure about that? Well, here’s more reading on what Medicare WILL and WILL NOT pay for in this informative booklet that I just printed out for every EMT at my service to read:

That’s the link to the “Official Government Booklet” that explains:

  • “When Medicare Helps Cover Ambulance Services”
  • “What Medicare Pays”
  • “What You (the patient) Pay”
  • “What to do if Medicare Doesn’t Cover Your Ambulance Service”

I’ll admit, this is pretty light reading by government standards, but it’s important for all of us in the profession to read, understand, and know this stuff. Sure, I know that some of you out there are going to fall back on our old standby statement that “I’m not in this for the money, I just want to help people” or some other platitude just like that, and I understand and appreciate your altruistic motivations… but I will tell you that EMS needs money to operate. Whether you’re a volunteer or a full-time paid employee, your ambulance service needs money to function. Paid employees need to make a living, ambulances need fuel, stations need heat, equipment needs to be replaced, and communities need 24-hour ambulance coverage to meet both their emergency and non-emergency needs. Ambulance services are critical for any community, no matter their capacity, and all of that stuff takes money. Medicare, through the “Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Serivices” (CMS) sets the tone for the entire healthcare payment industry and by default they have become responsible for propping up a majority of ambulance services through providing the lion’s share of their total revenue in some areas. They’re the big dogs in the healthcare payment arena… and they’re holding us back.

Not that I’m solely picking on Medicare here… but let’s read further into their definitions, shall we? (From the second document I linked to above):

“Emergency ambulance transportation

Emergency ambulance transportation is provided after you’ve had a sudden medical emergency, when your health is in serious danger, and when every second counts to prevent your health from getting worse. The following are examples of when Medicare might cover emergency ambulance transportation:

  • You’re in severe pain, bleeding, in shock, or unconscious.
  • You need oxygen or other skilled medical treatment during transportation.
  • You need to be restrained to keep you from hurting yourself or others.

These are only examples. Medicare coverage depends on the seriousness of your medical condition and whether you could have been safely transported by other means.”

Clearly, Medicare thinks that only “Skilled Medical Care” provided whilst tires are rotating under a patient is valuable. They pay no attention to the fact that there are better and cheaper alternatives out there that our profession could offer them. I know that Medicare represents taxpayers and the payments they give out are tax dollars, and I appreciate and want them to be responsible with those tax dollars…

I just don’t think that they are.

Medicare has determined that the only way they can be responsible with our tax money is to deny as many payments as possible and to only pay for the bare minimum that they feel is important. That’s why ambulance services are “Transportation providers” in their eyes. However, this ignores so much potential in cost savings in my opinion. They pay no attention to the fact that while it’s nice that they pay for “Wait-and-return” ambulance transfers to and from nursing homes and clinics, those services could be provided in a lot of cases by paramedics who could take care of the patient’s needs on site and save them a ton of money by offering the new service. They ignore the fact that if they provided a $250-$300 benefit for an ambulance to come, fully assess, treat an unresponsive hypoglycemic diabetic, and then release them safely without transport, they could avoid the (estimated) $500 transport bill and subsequent $1000 ER bill. The savings are potentially enormous… and there are a ton of ideas like that waiting to be explored.

We, as a profession, just have to convince them that these ideas are worth being explored.

The healthcare payment system shapes healthcare.  It certainly has shaped the way we operate in EMS. The pressure to do only what we’re going to get paid to do is so prevalent a force in the industry that it is almost the very foundation of what we do and how we’ve evolved. The payment system didn’t evolve to meet our potential; EMS has evolved to fit its limiting influence. This is why we do the BLS transfers that cost too much for too little benefit. This is why new products that can’t be reimbursed aren’t making their way into the hands of field providers. This is why treatment modalities aren’t expanding as fast as in other areas of medicine. The CMS fee schedule dictates all of this.

And we as a profession have to change it.

Imagine what EMS would be today if we could bill for any service we thought provided benefit to our patients and our communities? To be sure, this would cause some “waste, fraud, and abuse” in the initial phases… but that exists in today’s system. Could you imagine if Community Paramedicine was fully reimbursed? Can you imagine that if instead of providing a wait-and-return BLS transport for a nursing home patient needing a surgical wound re-check, you came, assessed, took some pictures on a cell phone camera and sent it to the physician wirelessly? Can you imagine if you could charge for responding, assessing a patient with a minor medical complaint, and then having the patient transported to an urgent care center that would continue your care? Can you imagine how different everything we do could be?

Well, at least I can start to imagine. I see additional revenue streams that would come into our industry and improve the profession, strengthen our patient care, and save the healthcare system a boatload of money while improving access to primary healthcare. I see paramedics and EMTs not being taxi drivers. I see a real career and a bigger impact upon the overall health of our communities. I see more fiscal responsibility. I see lots of great potential.

And I don’t know how to do this yet, but maybe somewhere, someone reading this might have an idea.

Do you?

————————————————-

I’ve written on this before, and maybe you’d be interested in reading some of those ideas:

“What is the next ‘Low Hanging Fruit’ of EMS 2.0 and US Healthcare Reform?”

And to look at a real-life example of how our British brethren are handling this issue and are having success across the pond:

“A Shoutout Across the pond to our British Brethren”

Posted by on March 17, 2011 • Filed under: Administration & Leadership, change, EMS, ems 2.0, EMS Management, EMS Topics, Funding & Staffing, new perspective, Paramedic, paramedic salary, politics, potential, profession, Uncategorized, universal healthcare, US economy

Remebering My Father, Chief Richard A. Kaiser

5 comments

I was walking out of a nursing home last night after a simple transport when my brother sent me a text. We talk fairly often; my brother and I, so this wasn’t very significant… except for this text said “11 years today, RIP Richard Kaiser.”

And I hadn’t remembered.

Has it really been 11 years? Did my father, Chief Richard Kaiser really pass away 11 years ago? 11 years? Eleven? Years? Has it been that long?

My dad passed away in his sleep, the cause of death being listed as cardiac arrest of an unknown cause. He probably was a victim of Sudden Cardiac Arrest (SCA), possibly precipitated by a heart attack (MI) that he either wasn’t aware he was having, or didn’t report that he was having. My educated guess is that my father ignored chest pain. If I had to guess about my father, the proud, healthy and vigorous man that he was, I would say that he probably felt some chest pain and ignored the symptoms. I’d guess that he believed, as so many of my patients through the years have believed, that his body wasn’t telling him anything important when he chose to go to bed and see how he felt in the morning. I’d guess that he had been experiencing the pain in his chest all day and didn’t choose to do anything about it.

My father was a volunteer Fire Chief in the small town I grew up in for well over a decade. The department and the community there still benefit greatly from his legacy. He owned the hardware store in town, was the president of the town’s small water company, and was the general fix-it man for many of our community members when they needed something done. He was always willing to help out anyone in need and was a genuine example of a genuinely good man. I benefit greatly from having his example to lead me in my own life and I am blessed to have had him for the twenty years that I did. I will always be thankful for his legacy and the path he left me to follow.

I’m a career paramedic and firefighter and I would say that it is probably him that got me interested in the Fire Service, which blossomed into my love of the Emergency Medical Services. Without his lead, I don’t know if I would have gravitated to the ambulance game. Perhaps my bank account would have benefited more so if I had chosen to adopt his entrepreneurial spirit, or even maybe his MacGyver-Like ability to look at something and make it fixed… but I took on his love of helping people. In fact, as his legacy I’ve tried to impart in the kid that I consider to be my own son that “Our family helps people”… and a lot of that comes from my dad.

After he died, I lead an unsuccessful attempt to place AEDs throughout the part of the county where we lived. The area is very rural. In fact, the town I grew up in, Edgington, IL, is an unincorporated bump-on-the-map surrounded by vast amounts of corn and cows. There isn’t even a post-office. The ambulance that responded was actually the first ambulance I ever ran a call in, and it came from 13 miles away staffed with EMT-Basics. An EMT did respond direct to the scene from her house and began CPR, but she wasn’t equipped with a defibrillator… and ALS care was coming from the city 30 miles away. I was an EMT then but I wasn’t home.

Needless to say, when someone drops dead out in that area, they tend to stay that way.

Since my father passed away at age 53, most probably from ignoring pain in his chest, I have been hyper-vigilant on diagnosing and treating heart attacks and chest pain. As a paramedic, my number one pet-peeve is patients who ignore the symptoms of a heart attack and don’t call 911. Trying to “Tough it out” cost me my father. It cost my father his life, and I have got to tell you… there are times in my life since where I really have wished I had him around to talk to. I have tried to stop questioning how different my life would have turned out had my father simply chosen to call 911 and get his symptoms checked out. I have come to terms with the fact that it was his time and that we can’t second-guess or play “what-if”. I’ve even reconciled my feelings that I can’t always be there for everyone all the time, no matter how much I may have wanted to be.

But people who ignore chest pain and other serious medical symptoms simply because they believe they’re tough or that it can’t be happening to them still bug me. My ambulance partners will tell you, I give these people “the speech” where I expound upon the fact that they should always call 911 for chest pain. Sometimes I even get through to them.

In remembrance of my father, Chief Richard A. Kaiser of the Andalusia/Edgington Volunteer Fire Protection District, I am asking each and every one of my readers to do me a favor. Please spend some time evangelizing to your friends, family, and other loved ones that they should never ignore chest pain or other symptoms of a heart attack. Tell them to learn the symptoms and make the call to 911 when they have them. You do the same for yourself. Don’t try to tough it out or do anything stupid like that…

Because I miss my dad.

Call 911 for chest pain. Just FREAKING do it.

If you’d like to share something on your Facebook pages, twitter accounts, or print something out and pass it to your friends, please click on this link: “Heart Attack? Call 911 – Don’t Just Burp” It’s a piece where I write about the same topic… just without this level of emotion behind it. I’d like that piece to go as far around as it can go. If my father’s legacy can save any more lives, this is one of those ways.

Rest in Piece Dad, I love you. Thanks to you all in advance for helping me spread the word.

Posted by on February 17, 2011 • Filed under: Administration & Leadership, American Heart Association, Command & Leadership, cpr, Emergency Medical Services, emotions, EMS, ems 2.0, EMS Topics, EMT, fire, Fire Rescue Topics, In the Line of Duty, Line of Duty, Paramedic, Patient Management, STEMI, volunteer fire department

Lazy EMS – Encouraging the RMA

17 comments

I had an EMT friend call me the other day with a problem she’s having at work. After listening to her and being less than helpful, I thought that I’d share this with you and see what you’d all have to say about it. I’ll give you my advice to her, but I didn’t honestly have all that good of advice to give her. Let’s see what you think.

My friend who we’ll call her “Ann” even though that may or may not be her real name, is a former partner of mine. She’s a cool girl. She’s as much of the caring, kind, and competent EMT as you’d ever want in a partner and she’s also pretty fun to work with. I liked working with her and was sad to see her move away. I was happy for her when she got this BLS 911/Transfer job on a “big city” ambulance service, but she’s had some troubles there. Now, I’ve worked with her for a year as one of my regular partners and I know she’s good at what she does. I also know that the reputations of all of the ambulance services in this “Big City” aren’t all that stellar. Frankly, I’d take her word over theirs if I was pressed to answer a about it. 

She called me and asked my opinion on what she should do about a situation that’s developing with a new partner of hers up there in the big city. She explained that this guy is a know-it-all type who encourages RMA’s (refusals, Against-Medical-Advice, etc) on almost every patient. She says that he won’t touch anything unless it’s a true emergency and tries to dissuade every patient who he feels is beneath wasting his valuable BLS time on. She says that it’s reckless and that he does it to excess, even when it’s clearly not in the patient’s best interest in her opinion. She says that he rationalizes it by saying that the patients won’t pay their bills anyway, and that some of these patients are simply being a burden on the system in general and that he’s just doing his job.

And I can understand that… to a point. I mean, who among us has ever rolled their eyes as a drama-filled patient tries to overplay their conditions to get sympathy and a transport or simply doesn’t even try and expects a free ride to three hots and a cot… I get that. In fact, I see it all the time. It bothers me to no end… and yet I rarely, if ever, encourage an RMA.

Ahhh, this is SO much better than doing a report

In fact, there are only certain times that I ever will encourage a refusal… and that is when there is a clear benefit to the patient not be transported to an ER via ambulance. I will do this at times when the patient will be better served by something like an urgent care center, or by a quick trip to their primary care doctor. I’ll show up, provide a full and detailed assessment, and actually talk to the patient about their options for medical care. I’ll tell them that maybe the stitches they need would be done faster and cheaper at the Urgent care down the street than at the ER, or that their need for a simple x-ray or throat culture could be handled somewhere else. I’ll even tell them when I think they can save money and still be safe by being transported to the ER via private car rather than by my ambulance. I feel comfortable doing that when it’s clearly in the PATIENT’S best interest – NEVER when it’s in MY best interest. Even then, if the patient still wants to go via ambulance to an ER or is unsure that my option is the best option for them I transport them without complaint. It’s just safer for my career to do that. Ultimately, I’m not a physician and I can’t make the final legal determination on what’s best. Only the patient or a physician can do that and I am usually not the patient.

However, that’s not what Ann says this new partner of hers is doing. She says that he tries to defer every transport on the grounds that he’s lazy and then he writes very sloppy reports about the calls he refuses. She says that he’s been in trouble for this before and that while he was working at another service, he was actually almost terminated for this behavior.

I know the type of EMT he is… He’s the “So, do you want to be transported or what?” kind of EMT. The kind of EMS person who feels that he or she doesn’t ever respond to “Check someone out” and that only the patients that absolutely have to be transported to an ER for an “awesome” enough medical complaint are truly worth their time.

I hate those kinds of EMTs.

She is concerned for her job, her license, and her career while she works with this guy. She doesn’t want his bad behavior to get her roped into a complaint, lawsuit, or worse… she wanted to know if there was a way she could protect herself legally from his actions while she was working with him.

I went with my stock answer on this. Being an EMS supervisor myself, I asked her if she’d talked to her superiors about this. She said she had done just that, and it hadn’t gotten anywhere.

I wasn’t surprised.

Unfortunately for my friend, there’s just no reasoning with this kind of EMT. I’ve worked with their kind before and I know how painful one’s working relationship with these people can get when you force them to *gasp* do their jobs and take people places while treating them for whatever they say their medical complaint is. They tend to get growly at you when you tell them you’re having trouble hearing them over the sound of you not caring what they think. It makes lunch time a tenuous situation and totally ruins the Christmas party.

My next pearl of advice to her was to tell her to actually send a written letter to her supervisors, detailing her complaints and stating her concerns in writing. My thoughts would be that then, there would be a paper trail that shows she at least tried to do something about it. Unfortunately, I also had to warn her that it may end up branding her as a trouble-maker when the bosses realize that they now have a paper trail too, only they actually have to do something about it. They may retaliate against her instead.

Then I told her to CC a copy of the letter to the medical director, just for emphasis. It’s because I’m a devious trouble-maker myself.

Situations like this are all too common out there and they are the things that hold our profession back. Yes, I know that there are system abusers out there in patientville. We’re not going to fix that with our current system and really need to get more options out there for appropriate treatment pathways. However, putting people at risk by encouraging RMAs because you’re a lazy provider hurts our efforts by setting a bad precedent. Please don’t do this people. Take it from me. I’d never let you get away with it on my shift.

Does anyone else have any better advice for my friend Ann?

——————————————————————–

Also, it may be helpful to read this post: a primer on the people I call “Grumblemedics”

Posted by on January 30, 2011 • Filed under: Administration & Leadership, Command & Leadership, Emergency Medical Services, EMS, EMS ethics, EMS Management, EMS Topics, EMT, everyday ems ethics, grumblemedics, medical ethics

I am not immune

14 comments

I’m going to make an announcement:

I am not immune to the things that I thought I was immune to.

You see folks, I am human, and as a human I am fallible, faulty, and flawed… Just like everyone else. I have emotions, thoughts, feelings, vibes, good stuff, and bad stuff that I carry with me inside this noisy brain of mine. I am not immune to the events that affect my psyche, nor am I immune to carrying the baggage that I obtain or the sadness that splashes on to me in my daily travels.

Of course you know that, right? Because for the longest time, I sure didn’t seem to.

I’m a long-time full-time professional EMS person and as such, I thought I was immune to so much of the stuff that I see on the streets every day. I’ve always said that I will jump right in and work in whatever conditions the job and my life seems to throw at me. I just tried never to get any of it on me personally. Death, destruction, abuse, trauma, pain, sadness, loss, grief… all that stuff seems both very real and yet still surreal to me.  I thought that I could bear witness to unfathomable human tragedy on a daily basis without any problem. For many years I still seemed to myself to be able to function normally. I thought I was ok with all of this.

And no… no I wasn’t that’s abundantly clear to me now.

You may have noticed that the blog’s been silent lately, and well… that’s for personal reasons. If you’ve been following me on Twitter and Facebook you probably know why I’ve been silent, but on the blog here I’m just going to say that I’ve had quite the personal upheaval. This, combined with a huge change at work has left me little time to sit and think about writing. It’s not that I didn’t want to write, because I truly love this blog and all of the fantastic people it has brought into my life. I just didn’t want to write crappy or say something I’d regret… so I remained largely silent on here.

I have, however, learned some things and have some things to say:

First of all, to my guys at the Rescue Squad: You are more than my coworkers, you are my brothers. Thank you for everything you’ve done for me. I wouldn’t have gotten through this without you. Family doesn’t begin to describe it. Thank you.

Second of all, to my local friends and Family: Ditto the above. I’ve gotten the chance recently to reintroduce myself to all of my old friends. I’ve missed you guys. Thanks for being you and thanks for being there for me.

And Third, to my blog followers, fans, and interweb friends:

I chanced to look at some of the facebook profiles of the people I’ve been talking to online lately. It’s amazing to me how many mutual friends I have with people I may have never met in person or have only met a few times. The names I see out there on the web are common names in my daily life. Since I started this little place on the interwebs the relationships I’ve been able to make with hundreds if not thousands of fantastic EMS people are amazing. You’ve all been there for me as well and I am literally so appreciative of it. You’ve rejuvenated my EMS career and shown me that there is indeed a future for us all in this business. I can’t tell you how much I appreciate it… it’s amazing.

It’s too common for us EMS people to ignore the crap in our own lives and simply drive on towards the next call. We shake off whatever is going on in our personal lives, shake off the sadness and grief that splashes onto us from the streets, and drive on like nothing has happened. We are mission-focused and are confident in our abilities and our immunity. I sure was. I ignored the bad stuff in my own life and focused on my responsibilities. Just like I would have gone on to the next job after a tragic call, I ignored a lot of things and kept my eyes forward. All EMS people tend to do that… we probably have to. The thick shells we develop are most probably a defense mechanism. Personally, psychologically, and physically we ignore what we need and focus on meeting the needs others place upon us. The long hours, the hard calls, the low pay… they do take a toll on us and we have to do more for our own well being than simply paying it lip service. None of us are immune. All of us are human.

It is shocking to me when I look around me at my EMS friends and coworkers and see how much strain they place upon themselves and yet are still able to take the next call. Nobody I know in EMS takes care of themselves like they should. All of them ignore their own well-being. I did that too, and even when I say that I’m going to focus in on taking care of me for a while, I feel selfish.

Well take it from me, you’re not selfish for putting your own needs first every now and then. It will make you a better person, and a better provider. If I could do things over again, I would have met some of my own needs and I bet that things might have changed for me… but I didn’t, and I can’t… and that’s ok. We all have new beginnings in our lives and this is my opportunity to do just that.

To my EMS people out there: Evaluate yourselves right now. Refocus on what’s truly important… don’t play SuperMedic because you’re just as human as I am. I also am issuing a challenge to everyone out there: Just as my coworkers became my surrogate family after my issues and watched me to make sure that I was ok, you all have to do that for your coworkers and friends as well. We depend on you, you should depend on us too.

Stay safe out there.

Posted by on December 10, 2010 • Filed under: Administration & Leadership, appreciation, ckemtp, Command & Leadership, edemse, Emergency Medical Services, EMS Health & Safety, EMS Topics, Fire Rescue Topics, In the Line of Duty

If you could have anything you wanted…

28 comments

I have a question for all of you out there:

A few recent situations have arisen for me that have essentially… wait for it… Removed almost all of the barriers. The sky is the limit and the future looks amazingly bright. I can’t tell you how good it feels to have my potential back.

And for one of those things, I’ve got a question for all of you out there.

In December, my EMS system is reviewing their protocols. We have a lot now and the protocols are extremely liberal. However, I’ll be expected to ask for new things like I always do, and right now I haven’t really given it as much serious thought as I need to in order to argue my case. Because of that, I’m kicking it out to you with this question.

Within the boundaries of what we can do legally within the regulations of the Wisconsin EMS system and within the realities of the current economy, if you were me and could ask for whatever you wanted from your amazingly progressive Medical Director and your amazingly energetic and supportive EMS coordinator…

What would you ask for? Toradol for pain control? Induced hypothermia (already have it), RSI? (got it too), CCR? (yep, we started it),  Mag Sulfate drips for anaphylaxis? (Have it), Glucagon IV for beta blocker ODs? (uh huh). Cardiazem? (yep)…

and Etcetera, etcetera, etc…

So I’m in a progressive system. The question is… what do I ask them for now?

What do you think?

Posted by on November 23, 2010 • Filed under: Administration & Leadership, Emergency Medical Services, EMS, ems 2.0, EMS protocols, EMS Topics, EMS training

A Shoutout Across the Pond to our British EMS Bretheren

6 comments

Mark in his British Paramedic Uniform

If you don’t know Mark Glencorse by now, you’re either very new to the EMS blogosphere or have been living under a rock. In addition to being a fine paramedic by all accounts, Mark runs the EMS blog www.999medic.com which is a member of the www.FireEMSblogs.com family of which I also am a member. Mark has a comfortable, familiar style of writing that brings you right there next to him as you read his articles. It’s almost like you’re running the calls with him, experiencing the joys and pain of a British Paramedic as he experiences them himself. He’s one of my Best Blogger Buddies and I’m proud that I can call him a friend. I read most everything he writes.

I hadn’t been to his blog for a few days though and thought that today would be a good time to catch up on what he’s been writing. He’s got some good stuff up lately, but in addition to some of his more educational articles, I found some things that just floored me.

We here in the United States can learn quite a bit from our brethren across the pond. They have aspects to their system that could be very valuable for us here in the states. Their EMS system is similar to ours in a lot of ways, not the least of which is the fact that they respond to largely the same types of calls that we do, but is also vastly different in terms of initial education, pay, respect, and capabilities.

I’m going to explore three of his recent posts here and see if other fellow US paramedics and EMTs will be just as floored as I was. Here goes:

“The Clash of the Assessments” – 999medic.com

This post explores some friction that he and his fellow paramedics have been having with “Walk In Centers” (WICs) that have sprouted up all over his country. He describes these clinics as such:

“In the UK over the last few years, we have seen hundreds of NHS Walk in Centres (WIC) sprout up around the country. These are primarily Nurse led units that are placed strategically in various towns and cities to provide care for those residents who are suffering from either minor injury or illness. They most definitely have a place in the wider primary health care environment, but ask any Medic what they think of them, and most will tell stories of picking up patients from the Walk In Centre to take up to the Accident and Emergency department who clearly do not have any specific life threatening or emergent need, and who, in the paramedics opinion should have been treat and discharged from the Walk in Centre.”

This sounds pretty familiar to me. Here in the US we have plenty of Urgent Care Centers that have sprouted up all over the American Healthcare landscape. They are staffed sometimes by a Physician, but are largely staffed by Physicians’ Assistants (PA-Cs) and Nurse Practitioners (ARNPs). They handle minor medical complaints and urgent-but-not-emergent medical conditions. Most of these centers are perfectly adequate for treating most patients with day-to-day illnesses and minor injuries. They cost much less than an emergency room visit and help save the ER from having to handle all of these minor cases. I fully support urgent care centers and their use in the spectrum of healthcare. However, my fellow medics and I can all point to times where we’ve responded to urgent care centers for complaints that we did not believe to warrant an emergency response and subsequent transport. I can emphasize with Mark and his coworkers about their problem with these kinds of transports.

Here’s what Mark describes as the “Rant” he’s trying not to have:

“My service has direct referral pathways to the Walk in Centres. If I have a patient who I think fits the fairly strict criteria for assessment and treatment at a WIC, then I can contact one of the nurse partitioners on the phone and discuss my patient so that they know what I am bringing in and more importantly that they know they are suitable for their level of care and will not need to be shipped out to the A&E department at a later time.”

Wait… What?

“My service has direct referral pathways to the Walk In Centres”

Dude!! We have been practically begging for that here in the US for some time! That’s AWESOME that the British can do that! Alternate treatment and transport pathways are one of the cornerstone ideas for EMS 2.0. This practice would save a great deal of healthcare dollars, would lessen the burden on the overcrowded ERs, would be remarkably more convenient for the patient, and would help keep the ERs available for the more serious of illnesses and injuries. This is a slam-dunk that we here in the US just can’t seem to figure out for ourselves and here we see the program is already active in the UK. We should steal that data and use it to help justify our own programs.

The next two articles I’m going to explore are pretty entertaining. Mark was selected to ride along in a multi-disciplinary unit of both civilian and military police officers in a busy urban center that has been having problems with alcohol and young people trying to mix too often. The set-up is pretty cool. He rides around with the police officers, helps them with what he is able to help them with, and is available to handle any medical problems that might arise with a 2 to 3 minute response time. The program sounds great, actually and I think that it could probably be employed with some success in many areas of the US… but read this account of his first EMS call while with the PD:

Mark (Right) with the rest of the British Team

“Less than a minute later, a police van turns up outside of a bar, the side door slides open, and out jumps a paramedic!” (Apparently it’s novel for the Police to be around with the Paramedics there)

“After a few quizzical looks, I get on with doing my usual job and assess the patient. He has a small cut to his forehead where someone punched him whilst wearing a ring. It is a minor wound but will need either stiching or gluing. There was no loss of consciousness, he has no other apparent injury and his observations are fine. Its still early in the night and he has only had a couple of drinks and doesn’t appear intoxicated.”

Man… so the patient is drunk and has a head injury… All you US paramedics know what that means. Here comes an ambulance in to transport the patient to the hospital. He can’t refuse because of the ETOH on board coupled with the head injury, and you know you don’t want to be sued… Let’s see what Mark did:

“I advise him that he needs to be assessed at the local hospital so that the wound can be closed. After dressing his forehead, he promptly jumps into a waiting taxi and heads off to the hospital less than 10 minutes away. I complete my paper work, Dave completes his log and we are off again.”

“From time of call to patient leaving scene – 8 minutes!”

WHAT!? OH COME ON NOW! That’s just not fair! You mean to tell me that Mark was able to use his clinical judgment, assess the guy for his injuries, and make a common-sense treatment and transport decision? He put the guy in a Taxi??

That would be a potentially career-ending move for a US paramedic. The Brits do it regularly. Could you just imagine what the ability to make those kind of decisions would mean for the US EMS system? Could you just Imagine what that would mean for EMS 2.0?

Let’s see what happens with the next patient encounter he describes:

“As we are sitting outside one of the shops, Dave hears one of the door staff calling for police assistance. He has been assaulted and has a head injury.”

“Again we are on scene in less than two minutes. This time the wound is a bit worse and is still freely bleeding. A dressing, some direct pressure and a quick assessment later and he is sitting next to me in the back of the police van whilst we drive him the short 5 minute journey to the local hospital. Again, no need for an ambulance, just transport to the hospital. In this case, and many others, the team are happy to use the police van instead of calling an ambulance into the town centre. It is a real benefit having the hospital so close to the centre of the town!”

“Even though we transported this patient to the hospital, we were again back in the town centre and patrolling in under 20 minutes from the time of the call.”

Apparently this is British Medical Control

So he brought the guy to the hospital in the Police car. Actually I’m familiar with the fact that they do this over there. Mark is regularly staffed to what they call a “Rapid Response Car” which is part of their “Front-Loaded Model” where they send a paramedic first to emergency calls to determine what the best course of action would be for the patient. Many times they don’t send an ambulance until the paramedic makes the transport decision. One of those potential decisions is to simply transport patients in the car with them instead of the ambulance.

You can find Part One of “Working A Police Medic Shift” – Here

And you can find Part Two – Here

I’m no fan of socialized medicine, but I have to give credit where credit is due. The US EMS system could learn a lot from the British system and I just can’t get over the fact that so many of the things we speak of for the EMS 2.0 movement here in the US are being done right now by our brothers across the pond. It would stand to reason that we could use the data that they’ve collected and created right now, steal a lot of their ideas, and begin to implement them right here in the good ol’ US of A.

Wouldn’t it be great if there was some kind of “Project” where an a British Paramedic could come to the US and explore the US EMS system? How about where an American Paramedic could come to the United Kingdom and learn about their system?

Oh wait, there is. The Chronicles of EMS has been doing just that very thing. If you’re a regular reader I’m sure you’ve already heard of it. If you’re not familiar with it, you should go right now to www.ChroniclesOfEMS.com and learn about it. It’s an amazing thing done by both Mark Glencorse and Justin “The Happy Medic” Schorr. If you’re an American EMS person, you really need to know about this and show them as much support as you possibly can.

And while you’re at it, check out some of the other fine British EMS Bloggers:

Insomniac Medic – http://insomniacmedic.blogspot.com/

“A Life in the Day of a Basics Doc” – http://basicsdoc.blogspot.com/

Posted by on October 30, 2010 • Filed under: Administration & Leadership, Emergency Medical Services, EMS, ems 2.0, EMS Management, EMS Topics, ER, medicblog999, Paramedic, UK paramedics, united kingdom, universal healthcare, US economy, Your Happy Medic

Primary Care Paramedics? I think it’s time

20 comments

Clinically speaking, there’s a whole lot of medicine out there that I don’t know.

I mean, paramedics like me go though a few thousand hours of training in emergency medical care. We get a few years of classes covering the things we need to know about treating the most common of truly emergent medical conditions. Heart attacks? Check. Strokes? Check. Airway Management and Respiratory Support? Check and Check. We paramedics are experts in the acute medical emergency. If you’re dying, we are well equipped and trained to support you until a doctor and a team of medical people in a hospital can take over your care. If you have a medical emergency somewhere outside of a hospital emergency room, we’re the first people you want to see.

The Medic is In

But, what if you have a particularly nasty case of Strep Throat?

Well… that’s called “Primary Care” and it covers a lot of non-emergent medical conditions. Strep throat hurts and it makes a person feel like crap. The times that I’ve chanced to become infected with a nasty strain of Strep “A” it’s made me feel like a warmed-over Code Brown Sandwich. It sucks being sick and that’s why people go to the doctor. Patients present to doctors’ offices for myriad reasons. Pink Eye, Influenza, the “creeping crud”, bronchitis, and gastrointestinal problems are common occurrences there. When I worked at an urgent care clinic we saw plenty of those. Up to two-hundred patients per day came in with just these kinds of complaints. There were lacerations, fractures, and other kinds of cases that came in too. Rarely did we need to call for an ambulance and while we did sometimes advise people to go to the ER on their own, that was rare as well. A good primary care doctor can catch most minor conditions and adequately treat them right there in the clinic, negating any need for an expensive emergency room.

However, the problem lies in actually getting access to a primary care physician to take care of you when you’re sick.

Yesterday, my mother-in-law (I call her “MIL” for short) called me up. One of the people she works with had an injury to his fingernail. He tore a good part of it clean off while working out in their warehouse. It hurt, of course, and it was bleeding. Their company is a small five person shop that they’re building from the ground up. A Workers’ comp claim would go right against their small and shared pocketbook and start-ups don’t have the cash for that kind of stuff. She wanted to know the proper first-aid for this and was trying to avoid the doctor. He was too. As owner of the company he didn’t want to have to pay for it and a fingernail injury just doesn’t seem all that severe. Still, it hurt and they were worried about infection. The guy understandably wanted proper treatment.

I told him that fingernails either grow back, or they don’t. Eventually it would be fine if he cleaned it with mild soap and water and put a non-adhering bandage over the nail bed to keep it clean and protected. I told him in a day or so to put some Vaseline-based antibiotic cream on it as well to keep it moist and stave off infection.

Don’t worry, I wasn’t practicing medicine without a license. I have my First-Aid Merit Badge from the Boy Scouts of America and that was covered somewhere in there, I’m sure. However, you’re right to think that fingernail injuries aren’t covered anywhere in the National Standard EMT or Paramedic curriculum. We are taught to bandage it up and take it to an Emergency Room.

Yep, if he would have presented to my care on the ambulance, I would have had to transport the guy to the ER for a physician to do what I told him to do. If he refused the $500 (or so) transport fee and the (astronomical) ER fee, I would have had to have him sign an “Against Medical Advice” (AMA) refusal form and could not legally give him any medical advice other than to be transported to the ER.

It’s maddening.

Fingernail guy didn’t have an option for treatment where he was other than to go to the ER. In the area where he was located, there aren’t any Urgent Care facilities. There certainly aren’t any cheap ones anywhere you go, but their cost is much lower than the local ER he was near. He didn’t have an option, so he had his coworker call her son-in-law (SIL) for advice. I gave it, and saved everyone involved a few hundred if not a thousand dollars. Sure, the guy could have called his primary care physician and gotten an appointment a month later… but I would think that as a self-employed small-business owner he probably doesn’t have access to health insurance at a less-than-oppressive cost.

A while back, I wrote the piece “Did I do Good?” regarding what I think EMS 2.0 should become. I think that Paramedics should be educated and empowered to step into the realm of primary care and be able to provide primary care in the field. Now to be sure, as Rogue Medic will point out, there’s evidence that states that Paramedics and EMTs are bad at triage and we are not currently equipped with the right education to provide these services at this time. However, I think that educating a group of excellent paramedics to the proper standards, giving them the proper tools, and empowering them with the proper legal authority could revolutionize healthcare.

Every community has a group of paramedics and/or EMTs and nearly every community (I would say every, but I have no stats in front of me) has less-than-optimal access to primary care across the spectrum of patient populations. To me, there is a clear solution that makes sense. Could Paramedics, once properly educated, equipped, and empowered, provide limited primary care services, appropriate triage, and transfer in the field? How about at fixed sites and clinics? We could follow protocols, utilize tele-medicine, and function much as we do now, but with a much lower-acuity class of patients.

Sure, there are Nurse Practitioners, Physicians’ Assistants, and other healthcare providers that can provide these services, but let them work with us as we work with them. There doesn’t have to be an adversarial relationship. We all have different training and that one set can be used to compliment the other. 

EMS 2.0 is about thinking outside the box for EMS. It’s about finding new ways to face the challenges. Thinking the way we have in the past won’t fix the problems that it failed to fix before. My belief is that with Paramedics providing Primary Care, we would greatly increase access to care, more properly triage patients to the proper healthcare pathways, save gobs and gobs of money, and just might “fix” this whole healthcare mess without all that legislation and legal wrangling.

Any suggestions on where we begin?

Posted by on October 28, 2010 • Filed under: Administration & Leadership, Command & Leadership, Emergency Medical Services, EMS, ems 2.0, EMS Topics, new perspective, Paramedic, paramedic education, patient care, Patient Management, potential, Training & Development

A Late-Night Rant about Petty Politics in EMS

16 comments

I had to think about a Facebook comment that I just posted on my personal Facebook page. Admittedly, I’m pretty angry right now and I probably shouldn’t be writing. It’s been a long night, you see… and I’ve had it up to my eyeballs with what I’m angry at.

However, this blog is my therapy and I can use it to get some stuff off of my chest whenever I see fit, right? Good, then here goes.

Tonight I’m going to forget that my computer has been acting up on me and has lost two 1000word-plus articles that I was lining up for the end of the week. I’m not even going to mention that I’m behind on a lot of projects because I’ve been overwhelmed with work. I’m not even going to talk about how the workload that I’ve let pile up has been making the blog suffer… Nope. I’m going to jump to the front of the line and bring that Facebook comment right here, to the front of this blog page where a few thousand EMTs and Medics might read it this month.

“Revenue Preservation, Area Preservation, Ego Preservation, and Political Capital Preservation” – These things are the top priorities of some EMS agencies I’ve dealt with over the years. Patient care is on the list, but its way down on the bottom of these agencies’ priorities. Some agencies have their priorities straight, but more it’s more common than I’d like to admit that EMS agencies have those four things at the beginning of this paragraph firmly implanted into their unwritten mission statements.  

I’ve written at length about EMS politics and how I hate them. For example:

-          Is What You Do “The Best You Can Do”

-          Volunteer Fire/EMS – Taking the High Road and Letting Go

-          Two Cases, One Letter: From One Paramedic’s Struggles, Change Can Come

-          Cat Puke Chicken

-          EMS 2.0, Bernoulli, Fluid Dynamics, and Changing the World

-          And Much, Much more…

And tonight, again, I’ve seen yet another example of the worst kind of EMS politics. I’ve seen these situations countless times before and I’ll see them countless times again, I’m afraid. People who don’t put the patient first have missed the whole point to this EMS thing. We’re here for the patient. We’re here for the citizens. There is a selfless aspect to EMS that must be respected in the preservation of the greater good. To miss that for almost any reason is to disrespect not only the foundation that EMS was built upon, but also the foundation of the entire healthcare system.

“First, Do No Harm”

Yea, that’s the first pledge of the Hippocratic Oath, the same one that Physicians take when they become doctors. EMS people are an off-shoot of physicians and we should follow those four words up there as much as they have to. Using the citizens of your jurisdiction as pawns in a political game is to violate those most sacred of oaths. EMS people tend to feud for the flimsiest of forgettable reasons. These feuds escalate unchecked for years until every action taking by the opposing party seems only to reinforce the perceived validity of the petty feud, even when the original actions or inactions that caused the feud were lost to history or died with the people who started the feud to begin with. Often, neighboring squads hate each other for no reason that they can remember. Factions within a single EMS agency may feud internally for no good reason whatsoever. These things escalate and escalate until patients are harmed by them… for no reason at all.

And if there ever has been a reason to harm a patient for a petty feud between services, between cliques, or between individuals, I’ve yet to hear it. In my opinion, using a patient as a pawn in a political game is the worst kind of offense.

These petty EMS politics, these laughable feuds, and the little kingdoms must have the light shown upon them. As I said in my probably politically incorrect Facebook post:

“I don’t like it when Petty People play petty politics with peoples’ lives. Really, people die from the kind of stuff I’m angry at without ever knowing that they were pawns in a political game. EMS politics must be exposed to the light so that the people that play them can be scattered like the cockroaches they are.”

Do you see anything that I’m going to be in trouble for tomorrow when people read that post? Remember, that’s on my personal account… not the blog account. Yes, I do take personal responsibility for everything I say on this blog page or in any of my public speaking or writing for that matter, but there’s a chance that people I know and may or may not have been talking about will read that tomorrow. My guess is that I will be the bad guy for saying it.

And frankly, I don’t care.

As I said in the post that I linked to above, Volunteer Fire/EMS – Taking the High Road and Letting Go – I am willing to bury each and every hatchet I do now hold or have ever held and solemnly pledge to conduct myself in friendship, mutual understanding, and for the good of the ideals in which we all should share. My guess is that there are people out there tonight who should do exactly the same. Don’t let petty politics harm those whom we’re pledged to serve. It’s not about us. It’s about them. It’s about our ideals.
It’s bigger than us. We are more than the sum of our parts. Don’t forget that.

I know that this hasn’t been the most polished piece I’ve ever posted up here, but everything I’ve said I believe. That’s why I’m a blogger. It’s why I’m a paramedic as well. Thanks for letting me rant.

The EMT Oath as adopted by the NAMET

EMTs have an Oath as well...

Posted by on October 27, 2010 • Filed under: Administration & Leadership, change, ckemtp rants, Command & Leadership, edemse, Emergency Medical Services, emotions, EMS, EMS ethics, EMS Management, EMS rant, EMS Topics, Ethics, everyday ems ethics, Fire Rescue Topics, medical ethics, Paramedic, politics, professionalism, rant, Uncategorized

I don’t usually talk about Political things…

4 comments

But when I do, they’re usually of the macro-local type and  have something directly to do with EMS.

This is one of those things.

The village of Schaumburg bucked the national trend of raising taxes and fees to cover rising expenses when its board unanimously approved a 4.4 percent reduction to the 2010 property tax levy

You read that right: reduction.

But that’s not all.  Village officials also did away with vehicle sticker fees and moved to have property taxes cover garbage removal.  

Just for the record, Schaumburg is in Illinois, folks. The same state that sent our senator up to the White House last election cycle. Lowering taxes isn’t exactly the modus operandi for an Illinois municipality. In fact:

Schaumburg is an anomaly among Illinois municipalities. Others like Gurnee and Orland Park raising taxes and fees where ever they can. Northbrook, which has seen an increase in sales tax revenue stood pat.

Schaumburg is one of the larger municipalities in the sprawling conglomeration of suburbs surrounding Chicago. It faces the exact same economic challenges that other municipalities in the area face, but it seems to be doing much better, economy wise.

The measure, if you read the article, isn’t final, but it looks like it will pass. Schaumburg has a full-time Fire/EMS dept and pays their firefighters extremely well, they also seem to have great city services and every time I’ve been in the city I’ve liked what I’ve seen.

In fact, the recent NAEMSE conference was held in a hotel in Schaumburg, and they played a small part in paying the hotel tax.

As I’ve said before, I’m not one to wax too poltical on this blog. This is an EMS and Fire blog and you come here to read about things related to Fire and EMS. I understand that. I don’t want to hijack the discussion to the miasma that is our national political scene and end up alienating a different percentage of my readership every time I post something of an opinionated political nature. However, local politics affect EMS and Fire, and I speak on the politics of EMS quite a bit. This is one of those issues.

I have to ask the question here:

Businesses pay taxes, residents pay taxes, Visitors pay taxes… It goes to say that the more businesses, residents, and visitors a locality gets, the more taxes they’ll pay by sheer volume. People have a choice on where they locate their business, where they visit, and where they choose to live. If you were in the position to do any of these things, knowing that Schaumburg is lowering their taxes, and plans on removing their property tax entirely - just like they said they would – would you choose to do so in Schaumburg, or in the other towns mentioned in this article?

In additon, removing the stupid municipal car stickers, which are really just a massive inconvenience and hassle to the residents of a city, and covering garbage disposal fees through what’s left of the property tax?

Well, Schaumburg… you may just be an island of sanity in an insane state. May word get out and people flock to your borders. It’s called “competition” and usually only successful businesses are the groups that think of lowering their prices to become more attractive to the customer. Bravo.

Source: http://www.nbcchicago.com/news/local-beat/Schaumburg-Officials-May-Lower-Property-Taxes-103947993.html?dr#ixzz10vUpO9PP

Posted by on September 29, 2010 • Filed under: Administration & Leadership, Economics, Emergency Medical Services, EMS, EMS Management, EMS Topics, fire, Fire Rescue Topics, Funding & Staffing, News, newspaper, Paramedic, Uncategorized

EMS case law? AMA Refusals, Death, and Documentation

18 comments

Our friend Valerie DeFrance, who runs the EMS House of Defrance from way up in the Vast Frozen Wasteland facebooked this article this morning and you need to read it.

http://www.leagle.com/unsecure/page.htm?shortname=inmoco20100921246

Yep, check that URL. It’s from a site that specializes in putting out snippets of case law and this one’s simply all-too-common.

You should read the article, or at least skim through the salient points, because this affects you personally. You as an EMS provider should know about this. Pay attention to this case and what it means to you.

In this case, a Paramedic/EMT-B ambulance responded to a person experiencing Chest Pain and Difficulty Breathing. This is a quote from the article: (The emphasis is mine)

The unit arrived at decedent’s home and Respondents performed a primary survey of the decedent ten minutes after the initial call was placed. Respondents followed up on their primary survey with a secondary survey a minute later. They then obtained a set of vital signs. Based on their examination, Respondents diagnosed decedent with acid reflux and recommended a treatment of over-the-counter Maalox/Gaviscon. Believing decedent was in no immediate medical danger, Respondents left the home fifteen minutes after arriving.

The next morning at approximately 10:30 a.m. decedent again called 9-1-1, still complaining of difficulty breathing and chest pains. An ambulance unit from Community Fire Protection District was again dispatched to decedent’s home arriving five minutes later. This unit was manned by a different two-person team than had responded the night before. After finding the decedent was experiencing pain across the chest and into the back, shortness of breath, diaphoresis and nausea, the team began administering emergency treatment with oxygen, aspirin and EKG. At 10:55 a.m. the team initiated emergency transport of decedent to DePaul Health Center where he was admitted ten minutes later. At the Health Center decedent was diagnosed with cardiac arrest and pulmonary embolism and began receiving treatment. The treatment was unsuccessful and decedent died at 4:00 p.m. on 11 July 2008.

So do you see a problem there?

First off, I’m assuming they obtained an AMA refusal form (and if they didn’t, they’re idiots). This case highlights exactly what I’ve always said about refusals being worthless. There’s no mention of the patient having refused transport here. In fact, this isn’t a case on whether or not the EMTs actions were correct or incorrect. This is simply a case to see whether or not they have protection under the doctrine of Sovereign Immunity. It looks to me like they were basing their defense on whether or not they have that legal protection, not basing it on their thought that they provided proper care. It looks like they were assumed not to have provided it. In this case, a signed refusal meant nothing. If they were successfully sued with no mention of the AMA form, what good is it?

Second off, it’s in the official record that their PRIMARY survey took less than a minute… and I can believe that if they were solely attempting to rule out an immediate life threat. That’s what the primary survey is for. As evidenced by the fact that the deceased lasted another ten hours, I can assume that there was no immediate threat to his life. However, they then did a “secondary survey” one minute later and cleared the scene with what I assume to be an AMA refusal in just fifteen minutes. So if we time this out, they made it to the patient’s side in one minute, did two assessments, obtained a refusal, and cleared the scene in 15 minutes? That’s one minute to grab gear and walk to the patient, a minute to rule out immediate life threats, a few minutes to do a secondary assessment and vitals, with no mention of an EKG, and a few minutes to carry whatever gear they took in back to the truck, get back in the truck, and clear? Um… Either these are the fastest medics in the West, or they did a very poor assessment.

And the guy died. And they got sued. And they lost. And they freaking deserved to lose.

The second crew seems to have provided proper care for the patient, and that is evidenced in the case outcome. In fact, the lawyers and the judge seem to have made it a point to show the poor care provided by the first crew in contrast to the proper care provided by the second crew. It’s clearly evident here and I’ll bet that if we were to go to that agency and inspect it, we could probably see the difference in dedication and motivation between the first and second crew. The first paramedic comes off as lazy, callous, and stupid whereas the second paramedic comes off as competent and caring. I’d be willing to bet that this is honestly the case. That the first medic was a “good enough” medic who often encouraged AMA refusals and performed just to the bare minimum and the second medic was somewhat better than the first.

So how, as EMS providers, how do we protect against the precedent set by this case law?

The answer is still now as it always has been, do a thorough assessment every time, kick the decisions up to the physician, and document, document, document. This case was in 2008 and if you were doing EMS back then, you know that a 12-lead EKG was the standard of care. This patient should have had a working diagnosis (Chest pain), attempts at making a differential diagnosis (lung sounds, History and Physical Exam, EKG, SpO2, and trended vital signs and 12-leads) and should have been transported. If the patient wanted to refuse, the physician medical control should have been contacted and this should have been documented. The time limit of 14 minutes of assessment and/or care in this case is evidence that this didn’t happen. The medics blew his call for help off and the patient died.

Here’s what I would have done: I would have performed a thorough patient assessment including lung sounds, ABD assessment, and a history. I would have gotten the OPQRST of the patient’s complaint, and performed serial 12-lead EKGs. Then I would have transported. If the patient refused, I would have transmitted the 12-lead EKG, spoken with a physician about the case, and attempted to have the physician speak with the patient. This all would have been thoroughly documented.

Patients have the right to refuse care if they are conscious, alert, and oriented. They have this right even if they’re being stupid. We have the responsibility to help them make a proper, rational decision and to show that we made every effort to provide them with the best possible information. Proper patient care and excellent documentation are the way we protect against these types of lawsuits… and that really hasn’t changed.

This kind of situation can and does happen. Protect yourself and your agency by never becoming lazy. Document! Document! Document! Do your best every time. Be thorough and don’t succumb to mediocrity just because it’s easy. It will catch up to you just like it did to these two.

————————————————————

For more tips on EMS documentation:

Posted by on September 27, 2010 • Filed under: Administration & Leadership, Case law, Command & Leadership, Emergency Medical Services, EMS, EMS ethics, EMS Management, ems narrative, EMS narrative report, ems patient care report, ems report, EMS Topics, EMS training, Management, narrative, narrative report, Paramedic, paramedic education, Patient Management, scenario, scenario based training, Training & Development

A Weighted Issue? A Burning Issue… Wow.

5 comments

I’ve always said that I love EMS and that I’ve taken from it far more than I could ever give back to it. The same is true with this blog. From my readers and people who comment, I learn more than I can teach and enjoy more than I can entertain.

This weekend proved all of those facts quite well.

If you didn’t read the blog over the weekend, you missed an amazing discussion on my last post. The post, “A Weighted Issue, The Fire Service Helping Private EMS” discussed the case of a private ambulance requesting a fire department for assistance in carrying a bariatric patient back into her home on a long-distance hospital discharge. The private ambulance was 5 or 6 hours out of their area of operations and the Fire Department was a full-time municipal department.

I linked to the stories that had popped up on www.JEMS.com and also on www.EMS1.com. I wrote my feelings on the issue, explored the case a bit, and then opened up the floor to the readers for their comments.

And what happened floored me, just knocked me over.

Predictably, I started getting comments on the post… Then some more… then more.. then a LOT more.. then a TON more. The post spread like wildfire and attracted some of the most intelligent discussion I’ve ever had here. It’s by far my most commented post with 86 at the time I write this.

And I read them all. I love comments, they come to my BlackBerry. Really. I read the discussion, the back and forth, and the wide spectrum of opinions as they came in, sometimes two and three at a time.

And my opinion has been swayed… my original perception that the Fire Department was Evil has been tempered. My original perception that the Private Ambulance could have dropped a dime and handled the issue with a phone call before the incident has not changed. However, I now focus my ire on the system that caused this issue.

The reimbursement structure holds the ambulance service hostage. No private ambulance would be reimbursed for hauling the patient with extra people. The service wouldn’t have been reimbursed for a 2nd rig and the patient had to be taken home. My guess, as was stated by a handful of commenters, is that the service was taking the patient as a favor to garner more business from the rehab hospital. I have no way of knowing that for sure, but it makes sense to me.

Not only did I get a TON, just a ton of great discussion… but the post spawned a few others as well.

This event has taught me something that should be the takeaway for us all. That is this: Issues like this are not going away. In fact, they’re only going to get more common. Private EMS isn’t evil and the “Private Transport Industry” is necessary for the functioning of our healthcare system. Fire-Based EMS will have to help and could never handle the strain of not having private EMS.

Sorry to both parties here, we’re all needed in the current system. Healthcare needs us all.

So play nice and help each other out. Remember the Golden Rule.

And remember the five P’s: “Proper Planning Prevents Poor Performance”

I shall leave you with two things:

http://lifeunderthelights.com/2010/09/a-weighted-issue-the-fire-service-helping-private-ems/ – A link to the post for you to wade into the comments if you haven’t (you should. Bring a snack)

And this, a  video that this experience has brought to my mind. “The Hats of Incident Management” It’s about highway incidents… but you’ll get the point. It’s a classic.

ParamedicTV is powered by EMS1.com

Posted by on September 21, 2010 • Filed under: 911 fail, Administration & Leadership, Emergency Medical Services, EMS, EMS Topics, Fire department, Fire Rescue Topics, Paramedic, professionalism, Uncategorized
Random Pages Widget Created By Best Accountant Services