Skip to content

Archives for administration-leadership

See all posts in the network tagged with administration-leadership

A Weighted Issue – The Fire Service Helping Private EMS

111 comments

There has been quite a bit of buzz lately over a story that happened pretty close to my generic neck of the woods. It’s been featured on www.JEMS.com as well as www.EMS1.com and has blown up the twitter streams. I was made aware of it by the JEMS Facebook fan page posting the link two days ago.

Before I link to the article, I’d like to say that I was immediately on the side of the private ambulance company and I jumped right on the JEMS facebook comments thread to state my case. I figured that there would be some dissention, but that most people would share my view.

But that’s not exactly what happened…

Apparently there is a vast chasm in opinions out there on this issue, and it’s not just the Firefighters vs. the non-firefighters like I thought it would be. The comments section is up to 61 comments as I write this and the discussion is poignant and well reasoned. I still believe in what I said… but I’m willing to revisit the issue

Here’s the article: http://www.jems.com/article/news/illinois-fire-department-refus

So… do you see the discord there?

The private ambulance service, which is a pretty new company that runs only one or two ambulances was started by a paramedic with a dream (yea, really). It took the patient from a rehab hospital to a private residence in Springfield, IL. I don’t know the exact road mileage, but I do know that Springfield, IL is a good 4 to 5 hours away from where the rehabilitation hospital is located. The patient was reported to have been on Medicare and Medicaid and weighed approximately 700lbs.

Yep, this ambulance crew had to take a 700 pound patient on a long distance transfer. I feel their pain.

The crew couldn’t get the patient from their ambulance into the residence when they got there and called the Springfield FD (SFD) for assistance moving the patient. SFD refused to assist them.

Ultimately, the private ambulance crew arranged for another private ambulance from a Springfield area company to come and help them. The job got done and everyone was happy, right?

Well, no… of course that’s not what happened. Someone alerted the media and the story popped up on the wire. Now there’s debate flying all over the interwebs and I for one want to keep it going. Viva debate. Viva discussion.

Here’s my comment from the JEMS Facebook Page:alled “community service” which I guess is something they don’t understand in Springfield.

There is nothing wrong with private ambulances and even the staunchest fire service EMS person would agree that no fire department would accept a long distance transfer (in this case, probably a good 5hrs) discharging a Pt from a rehab hospital to home. Some service has to exist to do this type of work, and Mercy Ambulance stepped up to do it. The patient was a TAXPAYING CITIZEN of Springfield FD’s area and Mercy was returning that taxpaying citizen to his or her home. This person has already paid for Springfield FD’s services and they refused to provide them.

I would guess that SFD regularly responds to other so-called “Nusaince calls” all the time, or have they stopped responding to Activated Fire Alarms, dumpster fires, and CO alarms as well?

Mercy Ambulance wasn’t doing this for the money. The reimbursement from Medicare is laughable and the “reimbursement” from IL medicaid is pretty much non-existant. They did this because the patient needed to get home. The reimbursement system is such that they would have had to eat the cost of additional crew and making the assumption that the SFD would respond for the “Public Assist” of one of it’s tax-paying constituents is reasonable.

SFD gets a letter in the file for this one.

I’m actually familiar with the ambulance service in question. In the area that it mainly operates within, the Fire service is always happy to help out the private ambulances with these types of cases. It has to do with providing something called “community service” which I guess is something they don’t understand in Springfield.

There is nothing wrong with private ambulances and even the staunchest fire service EMS person would agree that no fire department would accept a long distance transfer (in this case, probably a good 5hrs) discharging a Pt from a rehab hospital to home. Some service has to exist to do this type of work, and Mercy Ambulance stepped up to do it. The patient was a TAXPAYING CITIZEN of Springfield FD’s area and Mercy was returning that taxpaying citizen to his or her home. This person has already paid for Springfield FD’s services and they refused to provide them.

I would guess that SFD regularly responds to other so-called “Nusaince calls” all the time, or have they stopped responding to Activated Fire Alarms, dumpster fires, and CO alarms as well?

Mercy Ambulance wasn’t doing this for the money. The reimbursement from Medicare is laughable and the “reimbursement” from IL medicaid is pretty much non-existant. They did this because the patient needed to get home. The reimbursement system is such that they would have had to eat the cost of additional crew and making the assumption that the SFD would respond for the “Public Assist” of one of its tax-paying constituents is reasonable.

SFD gets a letter in the file for this one

That has been “liked” six times since I wrote it.

The rub here for the Defenders of the Fire Service™ is that they say that the “Medical Transportation Industry” is an “Industry” and therefore should have their own plans in place to deal with this type of case. They say that they shouldn’t diminish their ability to respond to emergency requests in order to help out a private business with a client. They say that they would expose themselves to liability, expose themselves to potential injuries of their employees, and that they would be providing this service for free. They say that this isn’t their job and that they shouldn’t be spending taxpayer dollars to help out a private entity.

And… I might concede that to them if I thought it was genuine. I mean, does the fire service help out the towing and recovery industry with cleaning up car wrecks? Do they help out the private fire alarm business by responding to and resetting false alarms? Do they provide private residences with smoke and carbon monoxide alarms?

Yes, of course they do all that. They do other things too. They help out all kinds of community entities, both public and private, for-profit and not-for-profit all the time. The Defenders of the Fire Service™ keep trumpeting their statement that they are an “All-Hazards” emergency response agency that is constantly adapting to meet “the needs that the public are demanding from them”.

All of those community entities the fire service assists have one thing in common, they pay taxes. Some of them pay property taxes, some of them pay rent that goes in-part to pay property taxes, and some of the straight not-for-profits provide services that help the people paying property taxes.

And last time I checked, the SFD does receive property taxes.

Here’s one thing with what I said though… The “All-Hazards response” idea is for responding to “hazards” and I can see where a private ambulance needing a hand isn’t exactly a hazard or an emergent need.

Would any of the Fire Departments I’ve worked on have done it? Yes, absolutely. A citizen needed an assist and we would have marked it as a “Public Assist”. We would have responded non-emergent, helped, and it would have been a non-issue. The person pays tax dollars and we would have looked at it as the same as responding with an engine for a 911 lift assist.

However, I will concede that the Private ambulance service would have been more proactive if they would have called the SFD and asked them if they would help them before they loaded the patient. If the SFD told them “no” at that time, they could have arranged for alternate methods at that time. Instead, they just assumed. They transported the patient to someone else’s sandbox and just hoped that they would play nicely.

And the SFD doesn’t play the way that Mercy Ambulance is used to playing.

If you can’t tell, I’m on the side of Mercy Ambulance here. Although I say that they should have dropped the dime and rang the SFD to ask them before they just assumed they’d help.

One thing’s for sure though, this issue isn’t going away and it will probably become more common. There’s a ton of differing opinions out there as shown by the comments that news story received and it shows that there are EMS professionals on both sides of the fence that have strong and reasoned opinions. This is an issue that would benefit from some discourse and that’s why I’m bringing it up.

What are your thoughts?

Posted by on September 17, 2010 • Filed under: Administration & Leadership, ckemtp, ckemtp rants, edemse, Emergency Medical Services, EMS, EMS ethics, EMS Health & Safety, EMS Topics, Fire department, Fire Rescue Topics, Firefighter Safety & Health, News, Paramedic, Patient Management, politics

Help!! Riddle me this… Quick like!

15 comments

Ladies and Gentlemen!

I am in a bind… and well, I’m asking for your quick, late night assistance. Consider this the LUTL pager going off and me begging for you to volunteer your time and respond to these questions. Won’t you help me?

I recently signed up for college and I’m facing the end of my first semester at Kaplan University. Http://www.Kaplan.edu. I’m completing a BS in Fire and Emergency Management through their online campus. I must say that I’ve really been enjoying it. I’ve had two excellent instructors thus far, and I can’t speak highly enough of them.

However… as my regular readers know, my schedule has been flipped turned upside down by one of my jobs and I am now facing a deadline of 0000hrs CST to have an “Interview with a fire service professional” completed and done.

And no, I can’t interview myself. Even with my multiple personalities firing on full cylinders… I just can’t do that in good consciousness.

So, I’m asking y’all, my (really nice, handsome/pretty, and intelligent) audience to answer me a few questions before 9/8 0000hrs CST! Hurry!

Three of these are easy questions… one of them is hard as heck and is sure to be controversial, actually. I wouldn’t have it any other way.

Thanks for helping. Please leave your answers in comment form, or you can e-mail them to the blog e-mail at ProEMS1@yahoo.com

Thank you!!!

Questions:

  1. What is your name, rank, and department? (Or general area of the country and type of service if you prefer)
  2. How long have you been a member of this department?
  3. Do you hold multiple jobs in the Fire Service/EMS? Care to share?
  4. Where did you work previously… the abridged version?
  5. What training or education did you undergo in order to get the job you have now?

And here’s the hard one:

First, go read THIS ARTICLE FROM FIREGEEZER.COM WRITTEN BY FOSSILMEDIC about Uniontown, PA scrapping their paid FD for a volunteer/POC department.

Then, go read THIS ARTICLE FROM PETER CANNING (and the subsequent article from the New York Times that he links to) about Fire Departments charging hundreds of dollars for all responses.

Now, answer me this:

With local governments all across the nation facing financial crises and the fire service not being immune to the budgetary axe… do you think that the full-time, paid, professional fire service will continue to be as much as a desirable career goal, in terms of pay and benefits, in five years. How about ten years, or 15 or 20 years?

Consider this as well:

People line up and submit themselves to grueling testing processes for one or two openings in full-time fire departments. Hundreds of people compete for one or two open slots in some cases. This is an example of supply and demand being askew… its simple math. Obviously there’s something that drives these people to submit to that process with little hope of getting the few available jobs. Do you really think that will last?

No offense intended to my brethren in the fire service. This is something I’ve seriously considered and I’ll bet I’m not the only one who has. The question has been asked. Let’s see what answers we get.

(and thanks for helping me with my homework… I’m really going to transpose your answers and turn it in as a paper)

Posted by on September 7, 2010 • Filed under: Administration & Leadership, EMS, EMS Topics, Fire Rescue Topics

What are you doing reading THIS?

No comments

When you could be reading Happy’s explanation of EMS @.0 over at the Chronicles of EMS website?

Go read it. Print it out please, and share it with the world.

http://chroniclesofems.com/ems-20.htm

Thanks, Happy.

Posted by on September 7, 2010 • Filed under: Administration & Leadership, Command & Leadership, EMS, ems 2.0, EMS Topics, Uncategorized

EMS: Is what you do the Best You Can Do?

11 comments

Not too long ago I was reading an article in Entrepreneur Magazine when I came across an article speaking on negotiating tactics. I wish I could find it, but unfortunately it was long enough ago that I’ve disposed of the printed issue (I subscribe) and cannot find it on the web. It was a good article and it taught me some words that I’ve since used quite a bit in my own life:

“Is that the best you can do?”

From the time our parent’s first put us out there in the world most of us have probably been told to “Do our Best” when we try to do something. No matter if we win or lose, we’ve been told that it’s ok as long as we “do the best we can” while trying. We seem to feel better at the outcome of almost anything if we feel that we’ve “Given our best shot” when we try to accomplish what we’ve set out to do. We all like to do our “best” and we hope that our “best” will be good enough.

This begs the question… is what you’re doing today in EMS “the best you can do?” Career wise, operationally, with your service’s treatments, with your own personal training and education, and with your own attitude… is this really “the best you can do?”

I would like to think that I “try my best” in my own EMS career and paramedic practice. I would also like to think that I work for an EMS organization that is trying to do the best it can for its people and its collective patients. However, there are quite a few situations where I have felt that I have not done or have been prevented from doing my best for a number of reasons. Some are reasonable and others are not. I’d think that all of us would give the answer that we always want to provide every patient with our “best” possible care. However, I’d also guess that everyone reading this can think back to any number of situations where they feel that they didn’t give it. Sometimes this reason comes down to the skill set of the individual provider. This could be a situation where the provider didn’t have the best possible information or knowledge available to them. They may have provided an ineffective or even harmful treatment modality or might have failed to act upon a missed assessment finding, such as by giving a medication for which a patient has a documented allergy because the provider didn’t know or simply forgot that the patient had the allergy. Sometimes the actions of others in the organization can prevent a provider from rendering the best possible care. This could be by failing to check, clean, or restock a needed piece of equipment or by providing inadequate care prior to a provider assuming patient care such as in the case of a first-responder crew failing to place a patient in full c-spine precautions when indicated prior to moving a patient to the transporting ambulance and the transporting EMT not having enough manpower to safely immobilize the patient. Sometimes the organization can hinder an EMS provider from doing his or her best by doing things such as providing inadequate equipment or medical protocols, or by mandating that a provider regularly work past exhaustion-level hours.

People inherently want to do well at whatever they choose to do for their careers as well as at other tasks where they feel strongly about the outcome. I may have accepted that I’ll never be as good of a basketball player as Michael Jordan, nor the same-level of cartoonist as Scott Adams, nor the best noodler in the world… but I’m certainly going to try to be the best paramedic I can be.

THIS guy, however, may be The Best Noodler In the World

Sometimes our own personal biases prevent us from doing the best we can do and for this I’m not talking about bias regarding any protected classes or topic, rather I’m talking about our own version of the status quo. A personal example of this would be my ALS Quick Response Vehicle at work. We went a solid week without having the proper forms available for the daily equipment checks and I didn’t have the computer access to print more off. During that week, I got in the habit of not using the forms and simply checked the truck based upon my knowledge of what was supposed to be in there and what was supposed to be checked. The way it played out, I ended up continuing to not use the check sheets when checking the vehicle, even though the forms had been replenished. A few weeks later, someone found that there was equipment missing in the vehicle that had gone unnoticed for some time. At that point, I realized that I had developed my own bias against using the forms for a reason that is even unbeknownst to me. I had gotten in the rhythm of not using the forms, and that caused me to miss that the infrequently-used piece of equipment was missing. I had developed a personal mental bias that prevented me from “doing my best” and thoroughly checking the truck.

Another preventer of best practices can be organizational politics, both internal and external. As a paramedic who regularly responds to other ambulance services to provide “ALS Intercepts”, I have observed that the politics between the services we work with can affect patient care for both the negative and the positive. While I am not saying that any of these arrangements result in inadequate patient care, I can say that the services with whom I interface most frequently and most pleasantly get a better provider out of me than do the services with whom my relations are less frequent or are strained due to political turmoil. When I respond to a request for an ALS intercept, I am being called to the “house” of another group of providers. While I am the highest level of care on the scene, I’m also a guest in their house. They have their own internal biases and I have mine. Sometimes the synergy in our working relationship can be strained, which results in a palpable difference in the flow of the scene and the teamwork exhibited at it. While I will ensure that I “do my best”, it’s easier to do it when I work well with the team I’m working with.

So how do we change things? We’re all human and we all have things that prevent our “best shot” from being the only thing that we “give it” in our EMS careers. This may be consciously, as in the case of internal politics; Subconsciously, as in the case of my not using the check sheet; or Involuntary, as in our service not providing us with needed equipment or our coworkers failing to replace an item in the ambulance that we did not have an opportunity to check. As in most things, the easiest thing for us to change is ourselves. Changing ourselves is a great place to start and will make serving as an example to others your main tool to use to try and get the best out of them.

Most situations can be made better and almost all of us can try harder. The secret is to attempt to do our “best” at all times and to try and ingrain our own best practices into our daily routines. This can be as simple as always trying to check the truck in the most thorough way possible or by making sure that you always check and recheck things to ensure that they’re done right. It helps to continuously seek out and recognize one’s own personal biases, (remember my check sheet?) to make sure that our own preferences and routines aren’t leading to suboptimal performance. Consistently ask yourself if what you’re doing is the “best you can do” and then ask yourself what you can do to make it your best. Mentally prepare yourself for your shifts with adequate rest when possible, manage your stress level so you can keep your thoughts focused on your care, and train hard. Ingrain your best efforts into the systematic way you do things and make your best way your normal way of doing things. We can’t change everyone around us in an instant, but our quiet positive efforts can pay large dividends in how people around us think, feel, and act. Our best may in turn get the best out of our partner, which may in turn get the best out of the next crew, and so forth. Soon enough… deciding to give our best may change your organization, our industry, or our profession.

And I assure you, doing your best will indeed make the difference in someone’s life. It’s just what we do, Folks.

“Is that the best you can do??

————————————————

For more on doing your best in EMS and in getting the best out of your EMS people read:  “The Shine Factor”

Posted by on August 19, 2010 • Filed under: Administration & Leadership, ALS Intercept, Ambulance cleaning, Command & Leadership, edemse, Emergency Medical Services, EMS, EMS ethics, EMS Topics, EMS training, Fire Rescue Topics, Firefighter, Management, Paramedic, Patient Management, politics, pride, profession, professionalism, Training & Development, training-fire-rescue-topics, Uncategorized

Automatic Window Roller Uppers and Other “Great” Ideas

12 comments

A few years back I had the chance to drive a 1997 Saturn 5-speed coupe for a while. It was a pretty nice car and I drove it back and forth on my tri-weekly 2 hour commute from the Quad Cities of IL to the Chicago Suburbs for my 24hr ambulance shift. It actually worked out well because the pay for paramedics was so much higher in the Chicago area than it was where I lived. I’d go up, do a 24 or a 48 hour shift, and have plenty of time to work my other jobs back home.  I didn’t really mind the drive but I’d save so much money by driving the Saturn instead of my full-size truck that I’d drive it whenever the ex-gf would let me.

One thing about driving the highways around Chicago is the incessant amount of toll-booths that one must cross while driving there. There are literally more toll-booths than I can count and every one of them requires a person to get out of traffic, stop, and pay the toll. It’s annoying in a car with an automatic transmission and even more annoying with a manual transmission. It aggravates me to say the least.

One of the features of the 97 Saturn SL 2 Coupe is an automatic window roller downer (is there a better name for that?) where the window will roll all the way down with just one click of the button. It was actually pretty handy for going through a toll-booth in a car with a manual transmission. I could click the button, then focus on downshifting for the quickest stop possible. This feature is common on cars nowadays, but back in the primitive turn-of-the-century it was my first Automatic Window Roller Downer Feature and I thought it was pretty cool… Except for one problem:

The window only went down automatically, It wouldn’t roll back up with only one click and had to be *manually* automatically rolled back up again. Yes, by this I mean I actually had to use one whole finger to hold the button. It was kind of a minor annoyance when I had to reaccelerate while shifting the manual transmission. Back then I didn’t think it was a huge annoyance, mind you… but I thought that the simple addition of an automatic roller back upper feature would have been much better. I could just imagine that the simple change would make it more useful and I was a tad angry about the shortsightedness of the engineers. I mean, why couldn’t they have thought of this when it seemed so obvious to my 20yo self? If I had thought of it had to be a good idea, right?

Well then some years later, I rented a car that actually had both an automatic roller downer feature *and* an automatic roller upper feature. I was so happy to find that! It was SO COOL! Finally the engineers had listened to my private thoughts that I never shared with anyone and put in my feature! I was happy.

Then I tried it for a while… and it sucked.

Yea, having a “one click” roller upper feature means never just cracking the window open a bit. One click may bring the window down a touch, but the auto feature keeps it rolling down all the way. In the previous design, without the automatic roller upper, this could be stopped by one quick click in the other direction. However, with the automatic roller upper feature, the window just rolls back all the way up! Getting the window open just a little bit is nearly impossible. Then I thought that if a kid or a less-than-intelligent adult chanced to stick their head through the open window and the button got depressed, the window could roll all the way up and choke them. The automatic window roller upper feature is annoying as heck and wasn’t the great idea that I thought it would be. It was an idea that I didn’t think all the way though. I thought I was smart and well, I wasn’t. It’s probably a good idea that I didn’t get all fired up and start a national letter writing campaign to lobby the car companies to put in automatic window roller upper features (Which I would have urged them to rename to “Chris’s Awesome Mega RoLL uPPahhz”) because then I would have looked like an idiot to more people than just myself. It’s the reason why I rarely orchestrate nationwide letter writing campaigns: experience. 

This got me thinking about all of the ideas that I’ve had about things in EMS and in other aspects of my career that I didn’t think wholly through. Steve Whitehead, the genius behind http://www.TheEMTspot.com wrote an article recently that spoke of the fatal flaws in the heroes of Greek Tragedy that I really liked. You can find the article here “8 Tragic EMS Behavior Flaws to Avoid” (I’ll link it at the end too, because you really should read it) but here’s what struck me so blatantly in the article:

The Critic – “This is all so stupid”

This is perhaps the easiest of all the hero flaws to slip into and the toughest to shake. The critic is convinced that the world desperately needs his or her opinions on the way things ought to be.  They figure out that offering opinions is so much more fun and rewarding than working to solve a problem and then it becomes like a drug. Soon they’re framing everything they see with the question, “How should this be done better?” and then offering their sage analysis. Usually with a poor understanding of why the thing is the way it is in the first place.

The problem with the critic is that they genuinely believe that the world wants to hear their endless assessments and when an army of engineers doesn’t show up to start doing the hard work of implementing all their great ideas, they get frustrated. The second problem is that they jump to analysis without seeking to ever understand the nature of the problem. Research and implementation are hard, but critical evaluation is fun and easy. As long as they don’t build anything real, they never have to worry about the next critic showing up, spending a few minutes looking at what they built and offering up their sage criticism.

This is the part of Steve’s article that really got me thinking. Have I been “The Critic” too often in my career? I mean, I don’t try to do this… but I find faults in a lot of aspects of contemporary EMS. I look at things and try to find ways to make them better. If you’re a regular reader, in-fact, that’s probably why you come to read what I have to say as often as you do. New ideas are great.

However, as my Automatic Window Roller Upper debacle (that yes, wholly occurred only within the boundaries of my own cranial cavity) has shown, some ideas that come to me and seem so obvious can also be bad ideas. My experience has proven to me time and time again that I need to think things through. I try, but EMS doesn’t always allow us the time to consider all options, let alone every aspect of every option. The Law of Unintended Consequences abounds and rears its ugly head quite often.

As the years have drug on, I’ve been trying to analyze my “Great” ideas more fully, but one person rarely has the ability to completely devise the correct answer to every problem. Two heads are better than one a lot of the time and systems have a way of developing themselves.

So as we go forth to change this thing we call EMS and usher in the new world of EMS 2.0, let’s remember to consider as many reasoned opinions as we can. We need your input and we need your participation. The more we grow together, the better our ideas become.

Oh, and here’s that link to Steve’s Article again: “8 Tragic EMS Behavior Flaws to Avoid”

Posted by on August 16, 2010 • Filed under: Administration & Leadership, ckemtp, Command & Leadership, Emergency Medical Services, EMS, ems 2.0, EMS Management, EMS Motivation, EMS Topics, Fire Rescue Topics, Firefighter, grumblemedics, inside the mind of a paramedic, Paramedic, paramedic education, Training & Development, training-fire-rescue-topics

You Can Nap if You Want To! Or You can Leave Your Calls Behind!

17 comments

What a week! You’ve been pulling at least a double shift a week at your full-time ambulance job and have been hitting it pretty hard at your part-time job as well. Both services can’t seem to keep their schedules filled and everyone’s been working lots of hours in order to keep the doors going up and the trucks going out. To top it all off, the citizens just can’t seem to be good lately and both services’ call volumes have been high.

You were tired when you got up this morning and were seriously considering a nap after your morning shower, but after a gallon or two of coffee you were bright and shiny in your uniform at your station, ready for another day of EMS greatness.

That was five hours ago though, and the early barrage of calls fired at you this morning has turned into an afternoon lull. Now you’re sitting at your main station, close to the brass, with the words in the educational article you’re reading fading in and out of your bleary, cross-eyed vision. Since the activity level has decreased, you’ve gotten yourself a case of the sleepies that you just can’t shake. Since you’ve been consuming the steaming bean juice religiously lately, your stomach just won’t let you think of having another cup of the acrid station coffee and there’s no shift chores left to do, since you did them an hour ago fighting the same lethargy.

Unfortunately, in three hours you can see a long distance transfer scheduled that you’re probably going to have to do. Four hours of monotonous highway driving and the radio in the truck doesn’t have that great of reception. You don’t have any idea how you’re going to stay awake enough to drive the truck and that’s not even considering the fact that if the tones went off right now for an emergency you probably wouldn’t remember how to put on a band-aid, let alone remember a drug calculation.

You’re tired, you’re fatigued, and your body’s telling you that you’ve been pushing it too hard. It wants to shut down for a while. Your brain won’t think. You’re mouth won’t talk. You can’t keep your eyes open and wake up with a startle when you’ve realized you’ve dozed off for a bit. This is torture.

Sleep deprivation is no stranger to EMS people. We’ve all fought the lethargy caused by long 24, 48, and more-hour shifts. A great number of us work more than one job to make ends meet and pack as much family time and recreation into our off time as we can. A lot of us are going for more education and all of us get woken up from our sleep a lot more often than is healthy to run on calls. I regularly miss full nights of sleep and rarely have a night when I can say I got a full night’s sleep. We get use to it some of the way, but our bodies just aren’t meant for chronic sleep deprivation. We need to reset and reorder our brains and let our bodies recharge once in a while.

Unfortunately, our communities need us and we have to be there for them. EMS is important and it’s easy to get sucked in.

That’s why in this situation, I have very little dispute with taking a “Safety Nap”.

"SSSS-AAAA-FFFF-EEEE...."

The “Safety Nap” is a quick power nap. A shut-down and reset period where a person who never knows when they may be called to be up all night without sleep can rest and relax for a while and ensure that they’ll be wide awake and alert for whatever they may be called to do. I took an hour last shift around 3pm as a matter of fact. I didn’t get to sleep until 1am afterwards and I was up at 5am for a call. EMS is like that, shift work is like that. We have to ensure that we’re well-rested enough to make quality decisions of the type we have to when they need to be made… and we can’t do them well when we’re drooling on ourselves from exhaustion. One of Murphy’s laws for EMS states that “You know you’re in EMS when your favorite hallucinogen is sheer exhaustion” and I have to tell you, I’ve done that while on duty before. It’s just not safe.

There are problems with this, I know. Some will say that we shouldn’t allow ourselves to be scheduled this many hours and that it’s irresponsible to do so. Well, then they can come talk to my bosses and pay my mortgage. Some people will sleep all day if they let them, and won’t put any effort into their shifts unless they have to. That has to be monitored. With that said, a balance has to be sought. I see nothing wrong with the occasional safety nap and I believe that EMS managers should allow it. They also should be unafraid to throw a cup of cold water on the Rip Van Winkles among us to ensure that they pull their weight with the non-call-response aspects of an EMS job.

What do you think? Does your employer allow “Safety Naps”? Do you take them?

I’d write more but Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Posted by on August 4, 2010 • Filed under: Administration & Leadership, Ambulance, ambulance humor, Command & Leadership, Emergency Medical Services, EMS, EMS Health & Safety, EMS Humor, EMS Management, EMS safety, EMS Topics, EMT, Ethics, Fire Rescue Topics, Firefighter Safety & Health, Management, Paramedic, patient care, Patient Management, salary, shift length, Uncategorized

Volunteer Fire/EMS: Taking the High Road and Letting go

14 comments

My father helped people. Not only was he the 20 year volunteer Fire Chief of the small town we grew up in and a 30 year volunteer firefighter, he also owned the country hardware store and provided the tools and equipment needed to keep all of the farmers in the area up and running. He was always on-duty for both jobs. It was a commonplace occurrence for our phone to ring anytime the store was closed with someone on the other end asking for something that they absolutely needed right then. He’d invariably go over and meet them to get them what they needed. He’d also be happy to go out and fix things for people when they needed it and couldn’t quite do it themselves. It’s what having a country hardware store was all about, I learned from him. People needed help, and we helped them.

That’s not all. We lived in Northern Illinois about 2hrs from where I live now. Every time it snowed my father, brother, and I were up before the sun helping to clear the storefronts of snow. After we did that, we’d plow the fire station so the trucks could get out. If it was Sunday, we’d meet other people at the church and get the sidewalks and the parking lot clear before the service. Then, we’d make sure and plow the driveways and shovel the sidewalks of the elderly and infirm in the town. It wasn’t a big town, just a few hundred people, so we knew who needed our help and who could do it themselves. We’d usually be able to make it to school on time, but the school teachers knew what we were doing and were happy to excuse a late arrival. The town was small, interconnected, and friendly. We all helped each other out and could depend on our neighbors. That’s just the way it was.

Growing up with the example of my father, my mother, and the rest of my family taught me that helping people was just what we did. I try to teach my son the same thing… that “Our Family Helps People”. I want him to be unafraid to lend a hand to those in need and I’m trying to live up to the example set by my father.

Back then, helping people seemed so easy. Sure, it was hard work sometimes… but we were happy to do it. Helping people feels good. I’ve always said that I’ve gotten more back from working in EMS and the fire service than I could ever hope to give back to it. Helping people is in my blood, volunteering is in my blood.  My community needs me to volunteer for it, and I need to volunteer for my community.

Those of you that read the blog often know that I am a volunteer paramedic and firefighter as well as being a full time paramedic and firefighter. In both of my full-time jobs, I interface quite a lot with volunteer agencies and personnel. I know the volunteers well and I’ve explored the internal workings of a number of volunteer agencies. I don’t think that volunteers are “ruining” EMS or the fire service as I’ve seen some of my readers comment, but I don’t think that volunteer agencies should be exempt from even one requirement of their full-time counterparts. Volunteer agencies have a lot to live up to. They need to recruit and retain good people and they need those good people to want to devote large amounts of effort and time to help the agency succeed. They have to be well ran and have to make their people feel good about being there.

I’ve been around the business for a long time now and “helping people” has never been as easy as it used to be when my dad got me up for shoveling snow. Helping people has been sullied by politics, by personality conflicts and power plays, and has been tainted by flawed goals other than the pure want to help our neighbors in need. The myth of the “volunteer shortage” is just that. There is no shortage of people who want to “Help people”. There’s simply a shortage of volunteer agencies that aren’t tainted by personal politics. The fire service, EMS, and its close relatives have oodles of interpersonal politics at play in their internal workings. It pulls these agencies apart at the seams and puts people through the meat grinder unnecessarily. Good people get SO ANGRY at other good people and the original mission and drive that caused these good people to join the volunteer agency gets lost. Grudges get created and held for unbelievable long times. Feelings get hurt, people get hurt, and the community suffers for it.

Enough.  

If I have been guilty of this kind of behavior in the past, let me apologize for it now. I resolve to let my grudges go and work for the best interests of my community and of the people in need. If my personality doesn’t fit well with another volunteer’s I resolve to work with that person to the best extent because the fact that we both are there for our community and are committed to our mission gives us common ground to build upon. When I disagree with another committed person, I resolve to handle it in the most positive way possible and find the best solution for all concerned. I resolve to be nice and stay positive. I resolve to show resolve for making our agency the best it can be.

Look at that previous paragraph. It was hard for me to write that because while I have my grudges and disagreements with other volunteers, I don’t believe that they are my fault. Read that again. I don’t believe that I am at fault for the disagreements, arguments, and anger we’ve generated. I don’t believe I am at fault for the grudges I’ve held. I don’t believe that *I* am the one in the wrong.

Nobody wants to believe they are the ones in the wrong.

I’m letting that go. It doesn’t matter who is at fault. None of it is good for the community. It’s not good for our agency. It’s not good for our patients and it’s certainly not good for the people involved. While I will always believe in the free, fierce, and open debate of ideas, I’m resolving not to get angry anymore. I’m not bringing my ego to the table anymore. I want my agency to succeed, I want our community to be safe, and I want everyone that is dedicated to helping my community to do the best in life that they can.

Is it time for you to let things go as well?

Posted by on August 2, 2010 • Filed under: Administration & Leadership, Command & Leadership, Emergency Medical Services, EMS, EMS ethics, EMS Topics, Fire Rescue Topics, politics, professionalism, volunteer fire department, volunteer firefighter

Modern (f)Art

4 comments

Howdy Everyone!! It’s Ckemtp, your friendly neighborhood EMS and Fire blogger with a few things I’d like to bring to your attention. I’d like to talk to you today about politicians. Not the politicians that are doing such a great job at managing our collective money on the national level… I want to talk to you today about the local ones, the ones who do the important work of making sure our traffic lights aren’t burnt out, that our roads are pot-hole free, and that our sewer systems don’t back up and discharge raw sewage into lakes and rivers and stuff.

Specifically, I’d like to talk about Local Politicians and public art.

My favorite writer, the legendary Humorist Mr. Dave Barry, wrote a piece about public art a few years back that you just have to read before continuing on with this post. It’s actually one of many of his articles that include things about public art, which he defines as “Art that is purchased by experts who are not spending their own personal money” it also involves the phrase “a naked man the size of an oil derrick” and has references to nuclear weapons and alcohol. I love Dave Barry, I really do.

Read this: “Does Public Art Make Sense” – Then come back once you stop ROFL’ing 

This is "Art" I think... Oh I know! It's a bus stop

Then, g’head and read THIS ARTICLE from Michigan Capitol Confidential which talks about the REALLY SMART city of Ann Arbor, Michigan… which is planning an $850,000 piece of public art. It’s really interesting to me that they’re planning this… and I really hope it isn’t made of flammable material because the city is “Facing a multimillion dollar budget deficit” and is planning on laying off firefighters to handle the budget crisis.

Here’s that article again: http://www.michigancapitolconfidential.com/13219

Yes, Ann Arbor, MI, the REALLY SMART city that it is, is laying off firefighters while spending $850,000 (That’s EIGHT HUNDRED FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS) on a “three piece public fountain”.

Oh, right… if it’s a fountain, it probably won’t burn down. That makes sense. Of course it might get filled with trash, since they’re laying off the city’s “Solid Waste Coordinator”. Y’know… the guy who oversees the trash pickup for the city. On the other hand though, they are hiring an “Art Coordinator” to, I don’t know… look at the art maybe? Maybe he’ll pick up the trash from the fountain.

Taxpayers, I’m talking to you here. Inefficiencies and, in this case, abject stupidity in local governments are killing us. If I was having trouble keeping up with the maintenance and mortgage in my own house, the first thing that I would do would not be to buy new paintings to hang on the walls. I certainly wouldn’t buy paintings at the expense of paying for trash pick-up, sewer service, or portable fire extinguishers. I think that I would pay for necessities first and niceties second. Responsible people take care of the whole Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs thing; Food, clothing, and Shelter first and buy pretty things after that. You do the things you HAVE to do well before the things you’d like to do.

At least responsible, SMART people do that… and apparently that’s not the kind of people that the voters in Ann Arbor, MI think would make good city council members.

Or do they?

Maybe they can call this "Art"

Posted by on July 27, 2010 • Filed under: Administration & Leadership, Command & Leadership, dave barry, Emergency Medical Services, EMS, EMS Management, EMS Topics, Fire department, Fire Rescue Topics, Funding & Staffing, News, politics, Uncategorized

What is the next “Low Hanging Fruit” of EMS 2.0 and of US Healthcare Reform?

12 comments

I’d like to ask a question to all of you medical-type folks out there, and for this one I’d like other healthcare professionals to weigh in, not just EMS. Of course, Paramedics and EMTs are encouraged to answer this question, but so are Physicians and Nurses (RN and LPNs), as well as CNAs and Techs. 

A conversation I had on Twitter regarding administration of 10% Dextrose IV (D-10) as opposed to 50% Dextrose IV (D-50) for hypoglycemic ambulance patients has me wondering something about how we paramedics can create major savings and improve patient care in a short amount of time. We need to look for more “Low Hanging Fruit”.

It is common practice for known diabetic patients presenting with low blood sugar (hypoglycemia) to receive a treatment with IV D-50, IM Glucagon, oral Glucose, or even with the “Kaiser Cocktail” and then sign off with an AMA refusal. The patients are encouraged to eat something containing protein and complex carbohydrates and are usually left in the care of one of their family members and/or friends who can watch them for a while and make sure they’re ok.

I’d say that calls like this make up a fairly large percentage of all calls for an ambulance. While I have no statistics to back me up, I would guess that it could be something like 5% or better. This complaint and resultant treatment pathway is something I do quite frequently in my own practice. Judging from my own experience, I would say it happens quite frequently in most other paramedics’ practices as well.

The question about administering D-10, as brought up by my twitter peep @un_ojo, is if all patients getting treatment with D-10 as opposed to D-50 should be transported to an Emergency Room. My answer was that I believe a 100% transport policy in this case would result in a lot of people being transported to an ER when they probably didn’t really need to be. This would result in a large population of non-emergent ambulance patients going to the ER who in the past would have been “treated and released” (at least under the guise of an AMA refusal) by EMS crews.

And that got me thinking about this question:

If paramedics did not currently have the means to treat hypoglycemia and every one of those patients were being transported to the ER, how much of a burden on the emergency healthcare system would be removed simply by giving paramedics D-50? Probably quite a bit, right?

What other common medical cases would be as appropriate for field “treat and release” (or “Treat and AMA”) care by EMS? If we save a few hundred trips to the ER by being able to sweeten-up and then release common hypoglycemics, what other conditions might we be doing the same for as safely and effectively?

Would this require some easily attainable training? What about new medications and/or equipment?

I look at this as the “Low Hanging Fruit” if you will, of EMS 2.0, and also of healthcare reform. I am a proponent of EMS crews handling more primary care duties, or failing that, of at least having more options in regards to treatment pathways.

That’s what I’m looking for here, folks. What could we do within six months that would make a big impact?

Please discuss in the comments section, and feel free to shoot me an e-mail at ProEMS1@yahoo.com. You can also weigh in on the LUTL Facebook page if you’d like.

Also, would you do me a favor and invite some of the other healthcare people to the party? I’d love to get some of their opinions on this.

Posted by on July 26, 2010 • Filed under: Administration & Leadership, Als, Emergency Medical Services, Emergency Nurse, Emergency room, EMS, ems 2.0, EMS system, EMS Topics, Paramedic, physician, potential, Protocol development, us

Four Words: EMS, Apathy, Disgrace, Massachusetts.

12 comments

By now you’ve all heard of the flap that is happening in Mass. regarding the 200 or so EMTs and Paramedics that had their licenses suspended or revoked for running a non-existent training program or for falsely representing that they attended non-existent training classes. If you haven’t heard about it by now, you’re probably not following EMS news as much as you should.

Here is one of the articles on the subject from JEMS.com

The issue has been discussed quite a bit around the EMS blogosphere. Some big name bloggers have written on it, and I even discussed it a little bit on the EMS Educast the other day.

Here’s TOTWTYTR’s take on this: I’m Not Very Sympathetic

And here’s Rogue Medic’s take on it: (this is a part-2 that reiterates the first)

Here’s the episode of the EMS Educast where we discussed the issue briefly

Other than for speaking about the issue briefly, I’ve been avoiding writing on it. My job is usually to report positive things that are happening in the EMS world and this is definitely not a positive thing. In fact, it’s a disgrace to us all. Rogue Medic has it right when he asks the question “Why do we Encourage such apathy in EMS?”

And that’s what this is. It’s not just that it’s apathy for the boring destruction of brain cells that we call “Continuing Education” in most areas of EMS, it’s the apathy for the whole process. The apathy where we as a profession have let the standards get to this point.

I mean, really. How many of you feel that the continuing education you receive is anything more than something you have to do in order to keep your license up? How many of you feel that your regularly scheduled, mandatory, continuing education classes are of any quality? How many of you feel like they’re actually doing anything good for you?

And that’s the system in which we function. TOTWTYTR made the statement that he sits through boring traning classes all the time because those are the hoops he has to jump through in order to maintain his licensure. I do too, of course. I sit through probably as many or even more classes than anyone reading this article because I am a practicing paramedic with National Registry and licensure in three states. Sometimes the training from one state carries over into the next, and sometimes it doesn’t. At any rate, I get to listen to unmotivated speakers read flat material whilst sitting in an uncomfortable chair on a very regular basis. We all do.

However, I feel that I keep up my continuing education quite well on my own through other means such as extensive self study and non-credit medical education. Keeping my professional skills sharp is very important for me because not only am I proud of my professional skills, but I am well aware of the fact that the quality of my skills translates into the quality of life for my patients. If I keep myself sharp, I’m a better paramedic. If I let them get dull, well then I’m an apathetic paramedic who isn’t doing my duty. Duty is important to me. So are things like Pride, Professionalism, and Honor. In fact, those three words are more than just the slogan for my blog, they are how I think that I and other EMS professionals should live their lives and careers.

Others have been quick to demonize the 200 suspended EMTs. Others have been quick to defend them. The ones defending them have said that these people are apt to lose their incomes, their livelihoods, and that the punishment is unfair. Well, for that part I disagree. The punishment is indeed fair. You could have killed someone by being untrained oafs with lackluster skills. You never proved you were otherwise. However, if you were to ask me if I thought that a state EMS agency – ANY state EMS agency – was competent to manage such a program, I would laugh at you.  Every state has made an attempt to regulate continuing education and I agree that there is a good reason for them to do so. I would also agree that the prospect of regulating a group of EMS people in their continuing education efforts is a daunting task. I would say that the perfect system has yet to be developed and that a good number of the 200 were simply “playing the game” and thought that since their states EMS continuing educational system was a joke that they could make a joke out of it as well.

Here’s the most biting apathy of all to me. If you believe that a system that you work under is a joke. If you believe that there is a better way to do something. If you believe that what you’re made to do is pointless and obsolete… then why the heck haven’t you done anything about it?

I’d like you to look at this issue from this perspective, folks. Sure, not everyone in that group of 200 were caring, competent professionals. I’m sure some of them were jackasses. (And yes, I said “Jackasses). However, I’m also sure that there is a percentage of them in that group that sincerely care about being the best they can be in EMS and they simply got caught up in the mob mentality. I’m sure that some of them had just given up. I’m sure some of them were good people who just became apathetic.

I hate apathy.

If what, say 50% of that group were of the caring kind, that leaves 100 people who thought that the system was broken. Did it not occur to any of those 100 people to try and change it? Did they not try and band together to improve the system? Could one person do it? Could 100 people do it?

If we are to be regulated and controlled by obsolete and ineffective bureaucratic systems, then it is our duty to rise up and change things. Sure, that sounds melodramatic… but how many times have you thought that your state regulations were stupid. One of the defining aspects of a Profession is Self-Regulation. Look at your states “Bar Association” for Lawyers, or the states “Medical Association” for physicians.

Is there any state out there that has a “Paramedic’s Association” that has any teeth to it?

No continuing education system or relicensure processes is even close to perfect. That’s because of a few reasons, not the least of which is because the government is the one running it. The other reason could be because it isn’t being policed by the paramedics who care about it the most.

I’ve said it before, I’ll say it again. It’s time for us to take ownership of our profession. Stand up and make this the profession it deserves to be. Stamp out apathy and band together to let your voices be heard. If you don’t start the process of meaningful change, who do you expect to do so?

——————————————————-

For more positive discussion on EMS, check out the comments section in “Negativity? You Won’t Find That Here” or for a description of two real-world moral and ethical dilemmas in EMS, check out “Two Cases, one letter. From one paramedic’s struggles, change can come”

Posted by on July 9, 2010 • Filed under: Administration & Leadership, ckemtp rants, Command & Leadership, edemse, Emergency Medical Services, EMS, ems education, EMS ethics, EMS rant, EMS Topics, Ethics, everyday ems ethics, Paramedic, paramedic education, politics, Training & Development, Uncategorized

As AmboDriver Always says… For all you EMS types

2 comments

The good folks over at EMS Magazine and Http://www.EMSresponder.com have seen fit to publish some of my EMS type ramblings in print format. It’s an article on Partnering With your Community as an EMS agency and if-I-do-say-so-myself it’s got some useful information in it.

So take a trip on over to have a read at http://emsresponder.com/print/EMS-Magazine/Community-Partnerships/1$13742 

Or, you could go ahead and wait till your magazine arrives in the mail of course… you do subscribe, don’t you?

Posted by on July 1, 2010 • Filed under: Administration & Leadership, Ambulance, Command & Leadership, Emergency Medical Services, EMS, EMS Management, EMS Topics, Fire Prevention & Education, Fire Rescue Topics, Management, Paramedic, volunteer fire department

Should EMS Improvise? And the Recipe for the “Kaiser Cocktail”

29 comments

Here’s the recipe for what I call the “Kaiser Cocktail”:

  1. Look in the patient’s kitchen cupboards until you find a box (or a bag) of some type of granulated sugar, powdered sugar, or brown sugar. (in a pinch, you can use honey or syrup)
  2. Find one of the patient’s own cups or glasses, wash it if you have to.
  3. Dump a bunch of the sugar in the glass.
  4. Look in the patient’s refrigerator until you find some soda pop or some type of sweet juice like orange, apple, or grape juice.
  5. Pour that in the glass with the sugar.
  6. Mix it up really well with some type of stirring device. Don’t use your pen or your finger. (Your partner’s pen or finger is ok though.) (Not really.)
  7. Serve warm, chilled, or tepid. Garnish with a peanut butter and jelly sandwich.

Have you guessed what the “Kaiser Cocktail is used for? If you’re in EMS I’m pretty sure you may have figured it out. It’s for sweetening up your local mild hypoglycemic… and no, it’s definitely not for serving to my son right before I drop him off with the in-laws for revenge purposes. The Kaiser Cocktail is for those patients who have blood glucose levels in the mid double digits but that still have the mental faculties necessary for drinking fluids and for protecting their airway while they do it. It’s a home remedy of sorts and it isn’t exactly the kind of thing that they teach you in EMT school. It works like a charm every time and I’ve never seen it not be well tolerated by the patients I’ve used it on or by the families that watch me do it. In fact, the families always seem more than willing to help whip one right up when I ask them to do so.

Picture this scenario: Your ambulance is dispatched to the “Known Diabetic with Altered Mental Status” at an address a short 8 minutes away. You respond to a well kept address in a nice neighborhood and are directed into the residence by a twenty-something female who tells you that her grandfather “Just isn’t acting right and won’t get out of bed”. Seeing no obvious hazards, you enter the residence with the granddaughter and follow her to the back bedroom of the residence to find a 60-something male patient sitting on the bed. He acknowledges you when you introduce yourself and you can see that he’s trying to talk but that he cannot seem to form the words. You say to him “Howdy! How are you feeling??” He answers: “Um… hello…” with a normal voice quality. His airway is patent, his skin is pink, warm, and sweaty, and he doesn’t appear to have any hemispheric neurological deficit. His pulse is bounding and regular at the radial and his respirations are normal. The granddaughter tells you that the patient is diabetic and that he takes insulin.

Got the case diagnosed yet? I’d bet you do. The next thing I would do with this patient is to take a quick finger stick glucose check. For the above fictional scenario, the reading would be 40mg/dl (which is um… “something’ MMOL for you British folk). It’s mild hypoglycemia. I ruled out a possible stroke (CVA/TIA) with the Cincinnati Pre-Hospital Stroke Scale and he patient’s cardiac function seems very normal with his bounding, regular pulse rate. The diaphoresis (sweating) and skin color are differential signs of hypoglycemia, and the patient’s past medical history helps clinch the field diagnosis. This patient’s blood glucose level dropped too low for his brain to function normally and he needs more sugar coursing through his veins in order to feed his brain.

You may be wondering why I brought forth such a common, run-of-the-mill patient presentation on the blog today. As pre-hospital providers, we have a few options available for us that could be considered proper care for this patient. Most EMTs have oral glucose paste at their disposal and a growing number of EMT-Basics carry Glucagon for IM injection. EMT-Intermediates and Paramedics usually have both of the previous medications available and almost all of them carry D-50, or 50% Dextrose solution in water, for IV administration. All of these treatments could be considered for this patient; however I would pull out my namesake concoction in this case. Call it experience, but starting an IV and giving D-50 seems like it would be risky overkill for this patient and an IM injection of glucagon saps the patient’s natural reserves of glycogen for quite a while after administration. Patients seem to hate the taste of oral glucose paste (Lemon?? Really??) and one tube never sees to do the trick. We only care two of them anyway.

That’s why I use a Kaiser Cocktail with these patients. As long as the patient can maintain their own airway and there’s not an aspiration risk, I can’t think of any contraindications once you rule out a possible stroke. It’s cheap, easy, and it has worked like a charm for me every time I’ve tried it. I like using it too, as it feels like a “Mr. Wizard” type home remedy that always fascinates the patient’s family members who watch me make it up.

Here’s the rub though, nowhere in my protocols does it give me authority to give a patient any nourishment or fluids by mouth. In fact, I can’t give a patient anything to eat or drink that isn’t specifically allowed by my standing orders. In EMS, even something as innocuous as sugared-up orange juice can be a legal difficulty. Common sense isn’t allowed by lawyers, unless of course they’re saying you should have used some. The reality is that every time I whip up a Kaiser Cocktail, I’m putting my license at risk.

I used a Kaiser Cocktail as recently as of the day I’m writing this post and I’m asking for a debate here. I’d like it if you would please answer some questions for me below the post in the comments section:

  1. Do you think that the Kaiser Cocktail is an appropriate treatment for mild-to-moderate hypoglycemia in a known-diabetic patient with a patent airway?
  2. Do you see any contraindications or risks that I have missed?
  3. Would a tube of oral glucose paste (or tablets, if you use them) be more appropriate than the Kaiser Cocktail?
  4. Should EMS providers be allowed to improvise treatments such as the Kaiser Cocktail for these and other like situations? Why or Why not?

I can’t wait to see your answers.

Posted by on June 21, 2010 • Filed under: Administration & Leadership, Ambulance, Emergency Medical Services, EMS, ems 2.0, EMS ethics, EMS protocols, ems scenario, ems scenario based education, EMS Topics, EMS training, medical ethics, Paramedic, paramedic education, Patient Management, Protocol development, scenario, scenario based training, SMG, SMO

Police Car Drivers, Ambulance Drivers, and their responsibilities

12 comments

Look at the pictures below and see if you can identify the three occupations represented by the people in the pictures.

What are their jobs?

What are their areas of expertise?

What would you expect them to be responsible for?

                                     

 

Yep, pretty much everyone reading this and almost every lay person you can think of should probably be able to answer the above questions. The Police Car Driver chases bad guys; The Fire Truck Driver squirts water at things; and the Paramedic takes care of people who are sick and hurt, right? Sure, their jobs sometimes overlap and so does some of their training, but the jobs and the requisite education and responsibilities are different and separate for a reason. The different roles up there are different, specialized, and require expertise in order to be effectively performed… right?

And before you think that I’m opening the Fire Based EMS can of worms, I want to direct you to this news story I just read on EMS1.com – Kentucky EMTs not called for 5 hours until coroner ruled woman was alive. Go read this and then come back please. It got me all riled up and I’m sure it will you as well.

The moral of the story, is that police officers were called for a dead body found in some bushes some where. They started doing their cop stuff and didn’t call EMS to evaluate the body because their cop training told them that the woman was obviously dead. Unfortunately for all involved, when the coroner arrived he told them that their police-issued medical training wasn’t adequate and that the woman was indeed alive.

And yes, I am 100% sure that nobody intended for that to be the tragic result.. people make mistakes, I know… but:

How many times have you been called out in your ambulance to a potential medical emergency and then cancelled while en route? Have you ever wondered who is cancelling you and for what reason? When we arrive on scene, we evaluate the patient and determine their need for transport. We have extensive training to help us do this and we function within a complex set of laws and regulations to help ensure that bad outcomes like this happen as infrequently as possible. Unfortunately, however, things like this do happen, even to experienced paramedics. How many times have you heard news stories about paramedics calling someone dead only to have them be found alive later on? How many times have you heard about occult neck fractures and other severe injuries being found later even after a patient was evaluated by a physician? It happens, folks… and it happens to us medical people too. Even with the training, knowledge, skills, and experience we have that is specifically geared to emergency medical care that is again enhanced by the fancy tools that we carry with us, we sometimes still make mistakes…

So why in the heck would a police officer, who as stated above chases bad guys and does other kinds of “cop stuff”, want to make the decision that someone was dead or not? It simply doesn’t make any sense to me. I have always been leery of having police officers call us off of medical scenes. Even when I know the officer and trust his or her judgment, I know that my medical training and tools are superior to theirs. That’s the way the system is designed, we do medical stuff and they do cop stuff.

I think that there’s a pervasive trend out there that causes dispatchers to send police units first to things like auto accidents and possible crimes in progress and then potentially forget to send EMS. Most of the time, it’s perfectly ok and turns out just fine. Other times, incidents like the above happen. How many times, also, has a police officer determined an auto accident to not require medical response and an occult injury been found later? I don’t know and haven’t seen any statistics… but I’ll bet it happens a lot more than is ever reported.

My advice? I promise to let the cops to their cop stuff. They just need to always remember to call me out to do my stuff. I don’t mind doing the report if I’m not needed or I get a refusal, I just don’t want anyone to suffer needlessly.

Be careful out there.

—————————————————

Want more of my thoughts on Fire Based EMS? See: “Fiddling While Rome Burns… The ambulance “industry”

Posted by on June 15, 2010 • Filed under: 911 fail, Administration & Leadership, Ambulance, Command & Leadership, Emergency Medical Services, EMS, EMS Topics, EMS training, Firefighter Safety & Health, Paramedic, paramedic education, patient care, Uncategorized

Master Paramedics? I’m asking you a question

27 comments

Let me ask YOU a question. What do you think about this:

How do we recognize the best and brightest among us? How would we distinguish the EMTs and Paramedics who have earned the respect and admiration of their peers for being “Really Good” at what they do? I don’t mean just a little bit good, or “pretty” good. I mean masterfully good. The kind of Paramedics that Johnny and/or Roy would have wanted to be had they grown up watching them on Saturday mornings. The kind of people that have worked in the profession for as long as they can remember but that never lost the passion for the job. The kind of people who read everything they can, study everything they can get their hands on, and always seem to have the answers to the most challenging of EMS trivia, as well as the most mundane.

What would we call them?

The old trade guilds used to call their most experienced and skilled members “Master”, as in the term “Master Craftsman”. As their members worked through the years and learned the ropes of the trade, they progressed through the various levels until they reached “Master” status. Some unions still use those terms and honestly, I’m unfamiliar with what all of them are. That’s ok with me because I see Paramedicine as a profession and not as a trade, but I do respect their tradition of honoring those that have earned the title of “Master” by thoroughly mastering their craft.

So what do we EMS people do? How would we recognize a “Master Paramedic” or “Master EMT”?

I’ve been thinking about this for quite a while, honestly. As I progress in the profession and in my career path, I’ve seen the people who were my mentors keep working alongside of me. They’re my colleagues now, and although they still mentor me in some ways, they have been progressing along their own paths just as I have this whole time. Some of them have become true masters of the profession. Some of them have not. Some of them could really be called “Master Paramedics” and I would like to know how we as a profession should recognize those people. I see that these people don’t tend to be treated very well by the profession in general and I think that it’s a crying shame. Think about it, new paramedics walk in the doors to the profession and are allowed to work in the same capacity as our master medics within a relatively short time. Employers tend to not want to keep these people around when budgets get tight because these people tend to be on the upper end of the pay scale. In some agencies there’s a defined career path and upward ladder, but in a lot of (and dare I say most) agencies there is not.

So what if there were a certification, or some way to define a “Master Paramedic” and/or “Master EMT”? What would be the qualifications? What would be the benefits? How would we define those people who have earned (Yes, really EARNED) “Master” status?

This is one of the things I’m asking you to think about. If you would please, put some thought into this and write what you think would make a “Master” paramedic or “Master” EMT in the comments section. No, I don’t think that this is silly. I really want to know what you all think about this.

Here’s what I think:

-          Minimum Years in the Profession: The Master EMT or Paramedic should have more than 10 years of FULL TIME service (15 years if volunteer, depending on call volume)

-          Minimum Experience and Type of Calls:  The master EMT or Paramedic should be experienced in a broad spectrum of the different types of EMS. 911 response within diverse response strategies, Medical Transports, and In-Hospital medical care.

-          Teaching and Precepting Experience:  The Master EMT or Paramedic should have experience teaching EMS classes and in mentoring new providers.

-          Command Experience:   The Master Paramedic of EMT should have experience in being in command of different types of emergency scenes and large scale responses.

-          Knowledge:  The Master Paramedic or EMT should have to pass a complex series of tests that show not only rote memorization, but also complete conceptualization and deep background knowledge of a broad spectrum of EMS and Medical related knowledge.

-          Acknowledgement by Peers:  The Master Paramedic or EMT should have the support and admiration of his colleagues, coworkers, and peers and should be able to get them to vouch for him or her when asked.

Now, I also ask you. If you were to recognize a person that could pass the standards that I’ve set, or that you and others set in the comments below, how should we show our respect to these people for their professional achievements? How should our profession honor and acknowledge our highest achievers?

I’m very curious about this issue. Please feel free to add your thoughts.

Posted by on June 8, 2010 • Filed under: Administration & Leadership, appreciation, Command & Leadership, Emergency Medical Services, EMS, ems 2.0, ems education, EMS ethics, EMS Management, EMS Motivation, EMS pep talk, EMS Topics, Paramedic, paramedic salary, pride, profession, professionalism, Training & Development, training-fire-rescue-topics

EMS 2.0 as Explained to My Brother

14 comments

My brother is an engineer. Yes, he’s a firefighter and occasionally he still drives the Fire Truck, but I’m not talking about being an engineer as it relates to the fire service. I’m talking about a pocket-protector wearing, slide-rule-sliding Engineer who draws lines on paper and calculates weight to strength ratios and the like. It’s math that’s way over my head and I’m glad that he’s the one that has to do that type of work every day and not me. When he explains his job to me my brain starts to overheat and I’m surprised that my hair hasn’t caught on fire yet. It started smoking once, but I was able to catch a glimpse of “The Hills” on the TV and it slowed my mental activity just in time.

My brother, Captain Kaiser, is a volunteer fire captain and he used to be an EMT although he let it lapse due to the fact that it limited time with his family. I guess that I got the EMS genes and he got the “go to college and get a real job that pays well” genes. I say more power to him and he’s one of my best friends. I don’t get to see him as much as I should, but we talk often on the phone. He has always been interested in hearing all of my tales of EMS glory, and I listen to tales of his two daughters. Raising daughters sounds waaaay different than raising my son.

The other day I was talking to him about “this blogging stuff I do” and I breached the subject of EMS 2.0. I haven’t written much about EMS 2.0 by name lately, although the concepts I’ve been bringing forth fit into my model of it, but trust me when I say there has been a lot of behind the scenes activity. It turned into an interesting conversation with my brother. He was an EMT but never got past the volunteering when his community needs him stage. That’s an honorable place to be, no doubt, but he didn’t delve into the level that I take it to. So explaining EMS 2.0 to him was close to explaining it to an educated lay person.

In the conversation, I brought up the scenario that I used to write the post: “Are We the Gatekeepers to the Emergency Healthcare System?” (Unofficially titled, “Did I do good?”) and explained to him how I evaluated a patient in a nursing home, performed a full assessment on her including a 12-lead EKG and a review of her recent lab work, held a telephone conference with her Primary Care Physician and the Nursing staff on scene, and triaged the patient to the Primary Heathcare System as opposed to the Emergency Healthcare System. In the process, I saved the healthcare system (in the form of Medicare) thousands of dollars and provided better care to the patient by deferring her from the emergency room. I explained to him that my ambulance service could not bill the patient for the care I provided her because we did not transport and that the current system needs to recognize the value in having EMS provide such services in terms of cost-savings. If I would have transported, our service would have made the revenue, but Medicare would have paid thousands of dollars in unnecessary care overall. Since I didn’t, I saved Medicare thousands, but the service wasn’t valued and we didn’t receive any compensation for our work.

Basically, the conversation wound up being that he agreed with me that EMS has a powerful position to improve access to primary care and “save” healthcare as it were by increasing access to primary care, properly deferring patients from the emergency healthcare system when their care could be more appropriately managed in the primary care setting, and by saving millions of dollars in the overall healthcare setting. He agreed with me that it would require deregulation of the EMS industry to allow us to attempt programs and offer new services outside of our current mold and would require increased education of street-level EMS providers to get this done. He also agreed with me that money we’re already collectively spending should be allocated from inefficient programs and given to efficient high-performance EMS systems to do this in order to realize greater savings.

Remember, he’s an engineer. He’s good at math. He may not be a healthcare provider currently schlepping patients around in a shiny red and white bus that makes “woo woo” sounds, but he’s as smart as they come…

And when I told him that he’s exactly who we should be getting our message out to, he disagreed. He thinks that we should be out there talking to politicians and Insurance Industry executives. Honestly, he chastised me for not being in my local congresshuman’s office to do just that.

So, here’s a shoutout to the politicos out there: “EMS can ‘save’ healthcare through a free-market, grass-roots, innovative solution using currently available resources. We can save millions and improve the entire healthcare system just by putting in place a few good ideas and allowing EMS professionals the ability to think outside of the box”.

So do me a favor, y’all. Go tell your local politico to e-mail me at Proems1@yahoo.com. I’d love to have a talk with them. You should too.

Posted by on May 26, 2010 • Filed under: Administration & Leadership, Command & Leadership, Economics, Emergency Medical Services, EMS, ems 2.0, EMS Management, EMS system, EMS Topics, Fire Rescue Topics, Management, Paramedic, paramedic education, PR, profession, US economy

EMS Week 2010 – Sent to the Newspaper

19 comments

I wrote this post for publishing in my community’s local newspaper. You may wish to send it to yours as well. It’s a generic “EMS Needs Your Support” piece. It might work for any time of the year, but it’s customized for EMS week 2010.

————————————————–

“Anytime. Anywhere. We’ll Be There” National EMS Week 2010

National Emergency Medical Services Week or “EMS Week” 2010 is coming up this year on May 16th through May 22nd. It is a time to think about the people whom our communities rely on to help us when the unthinkable happens. Every day in our community and in communities like ours throughout the nation, emergencies happen to people just like you and I. These local emergencies may not get the press coverage that the big disasters happening thousands of miles away receive, but to our friends and neighbors these day-to-day emergencies can be just as dangerous and deadly. We rely upon Emergency Medical Technicians (EMTs) and Paramedics to respond and make a difference in our lives. No matter the need, no matter the call, EMS stands ready to serve you.

Logo for EMS Week 2010 - from ACEP

Logo for EMS Week 2010 - from ACEP

EMS is at once the most iconic and visible part of the emergency healthcare system. It is also probably the most misunderstood. Almost everyone can recognize an ambulance and most people have an idea of its purpose. However people rarely give thought to the capabilities and education of the people working inside of it. EMTs and Paramedics have long since evolved from their humble beginnings as simply a fast ride to the hospital. Today’s ambulances are highly specialized mobile intensive care units and today’s EMT attends hundreds of hours of classroom education for their initial certification. Paramedics, the highest level of field medical providers, attend thousands of hours of initial education and internship time and must be masters of acute care. Not only that, but EMTs and Paramedics alike must recertify their license every few years and must attend hundreds more hours of continuing education to achieve their recertification. This training covers all aspects of acute emergency care and is quite intense and rigorous.

Today’s EMS system, with Paramedics and EMTs working in tandem, brings the first hour of Emergency Room care to the patient’s side no matter where the patient may be. EMS focuses upon providing immediate stabilizing care that stops or slows the progression of the acute disease process or damage from any injury, protects the patient from further aggravation of the condition, and impacts their long-term continuity of care. This care reduces Mortality, or loss of life, as well as Morbidity, or future quality of life. Calling 911 during a medical emergency produces better outcomes than does simply driving a seriously ill or injured person to a hospital. Early intervention in cases such as a heart attack or stroke can mean the difference between those conditions leading to long-term disability or a full recovery.

Every community in our region has emergency ambulance services available at a moment’s notice that are simply a 911 call away. Some communities provide Basic Life Support ambulances, with EMT level personnel. These ambulances are supported by Advanced Life Support ambulances and units staffed by Paramedics that can respond with the Basic ambulances to provide advanced level Paramedic care. It is important for people within our community to ask questions and get to know the people responding to their calls for help. Learn about their capabilities and their needs. Pitch in and help where you can. EMS people have always been the absolute masters of doing anything with nothing but we are desperately in need of the support and attention of the communities we serve. It is common for community members to not think about their local ambulance services until the time that they need their services however, EMS needs your support. Americans have always been massively charitable towards disasters happening thousands of miles away when images from them flood our television screens and newspapers, but rarely does that same charity flow to their local emergency responders who are taking care of our friends and neighbors. Your local EMS service needs your support to maintain high-levels of lifesaving service in your own communities. You can directly impact the service that your local EMS can give to your friends, your neighbors, your loved-ones, and even yourself. 

Get informed, get involved, pitch in, and help us help you.

The official theme for EMS week 2010 is “Anytime. Anywhere. We’ll Be There.” EMS has made the commitment to be there for you. This week, please think about how you can be there for EMS. The impact of your support for EMS translates directly back into improving the lives of the people in our communities. As the saying goes, the life you save may be your own.

Respectfully,

Chris Kaiser NREMT-P

www.LifeUnderTheLights.com

Posted by on May 14, 2010 • Filed under: 911, Administration & Leadership, Ambulance, ckemtp, Emergency Medical Services, EMS, EMS Management, EMS Topics, EMS week, ems week 2010, Paramedic, politics, profession, professionalism, Uncategorized

EMS Week 2010 – Thank You Letter from Management to EMS Crews

7 comments

This letter is free to copy and customize for your organization. It is a thank you letter from Management to Medics. I do not wish for any credits and you may use it as you see fit.

Oh, and if anyone who comes here wants a custom EMS Week 2010 letter written to fit their needs I will do it for free. Shoot me an e-mail at: Proems1@yahoo.com

——————————————–

Dear fellow EMS professionals,

EMS Week again is upon us and we’d like to take this chance to say thank you for all that you do. We know that everyone who works here puts in long hours and sleepless nights taking care of the needs of our community and meeting our (company)’s mission. We know that you’re dedicated, we know that you care, and we also know that you don’t get the amount of thanks that you deserve most of the time.

So today, we’d like to take this opportunity to say “Thank you” to everyone who works here. Thank you for your time. Thank you for your dedication. Thank you for your caring, your compassion, and your devotion to patient care. Thank you for working long shifts and for holding over to cover late calls. Thank you for taking time away from your families to keep our trucks on the streets for our communities 24/7. Thank you for thinking on your feet to solve new problems for our patients. Thank you for comforting families. Thank you for comforting the community. Thank you for risking your safety. Thank you for your bravery. Thank you for your commitment. Thank you for more than we have space to thank you for. Thank you for more than we know how to thank you for.

EMS Week is an opportunity for the public to recognize what we do out there every day. It’s an opportunity for us to showcase our talents, to let the public know how to use us, when to use us, and why to use us. It’s an opportunity for us to connect with our communities and for them to connect with us. What we do is important. EMS is a necessary service that is vital for our community and the nation. EMTs and Paramedics are the healthcare safety net for all of us. We’re there for everyone when they need them, on their terms, doing what’s best for them. We come to them, meet them as they are, and give them the best that we have to offer. We should use this week to reinforce that, and to improve our relationship with them.

In closing, EMS Week isn’t quite up to the task of thanking heroes. In reality, nothing is. Please know that no matter what happens, we know that you work hard and that you care. We know what you are accomplishing out there and we give you our respect. We give you our sincere thanks. We pledge to support you as best as we are able and we know that you’ll continue to give us your best.

Respectfully,

Management of Some Ambulance Company Somewhere

http://www.LifeUnderTheLights.com

————————————————

Just change it to suit your needs. Rework it as you see fit. It’s free to use and to modify. Do me a favor and leave a comment, anonymous if you’d like, about your using it.

Posted by on May 4, 2010 • Filed under: Administration & Leadership, Command & Leadership, Emergency Medical Services, EMS, EMS Health & Safety, EMS Management, EMS pep talk, EMS Topics, EMS week, ems week 2010, Fire Rescue Topics, Management, Paramedic

A Slap in the Face for Medics? How about a Wake-up call

20 comments

Thank you everyone! Yesterday when I posted “A Slap in the Face to Paramedics Everywhere?” I recorded my biggest traffic day ever by at least one thousand visitors. I’m honored. Thank you for coming and reading this and thank you for caring about EMS. Especially, thank you those who left such intelligent comments and added to the debate. We who care about our profession need people who are passionate, intelligent, and who are ready to work alongside of us to improve who we are and what we do. By participating here and in the wider EMS blogosphere, you’re helping spread the ideas that we need to spread. Read, Talk, Learn, and Think. Make this the profession you want it to be.

I’m going to repeat that above statement: “Make this the profession you want it to be”

And there lies the true meaning of what I wrote yesterday. Sure, I was mad about the perceived encroachment by nurses onto our professional “turf”, and sure I played my anger up into what I thought would be something to fire you up as well, but there was a message there that not everyone may have gotten.

I know that there are good nurses out there that know a lot about a lot of stuff. A lot of them do a great job in the field within their scope and their experience in such things as neonatology, pediatrics, and critical care has proven invaluable to me on a lot of occasions. Yes, like each and every medic out there I can speak volumes about the times I’ve seen and worked with nurses who seem to be lacking vital chromosomes, but I’ve seen members of every profession that seem to have written their final exams in crayon. It’s no different when I am staffed alongside an idiot partner of the EMT persuasion… give me a smart nurse in their place any day.

However, my beef is this: Why is it necessary that a nurse need ever step into the field? The times I’ve had to carry one in the back of my rig have been mainly because of protocol deficiencies, where the EMS system I was working in at the time didn’t allow me to transport a specialized piece of equipment that was attached to a patient or to administer medications that were beyond the normal scope of the field. Now days, my EMS system allows me to transport pretty much anything and I’ve personally taken the steps to educate myself on the less-common things that I see. However, I’ve grabbed a nurse on occasion when called to transport multiple uncommon medications along with unfamiliar equipment. I’ve never been too proud to ask for help when I wasn’t fully confident in my abilities to fully handle possible eventualities with the patient. It’s not about my ego, it’s about patient care. I live by that motto. However there is no reason, in my opinion, that a paramedic cannot take the education necessary to become experts in any and every aspect of out-of-hospital care. It’s our bread and butter and the thought that our skills are lacking causes me concern. Whatever you call it: inter-hospital, pre-hospital, field, or other care… Paramedics are supposed to be the experts at that in my opinion and I want us to take the steps to ensure that we are so.

If you were angered by the actions of this ambulance service plastering their truck with the phrase “Staffed by Nurses”, that’s good. You should have been. Be angry at the management of that service for existing in a system that they haven’t changed for the better so that they don’t have to use nurses for things that paramedics should be doing. Be angry at their EMS system and their state for limiting their paramedics’ scope of practice and education so that they cannot be used to adequately staff the truck. Then, be angry at each and every one of us for not taking the ownership of our profession so that we can step up and dictate what is best for the patient’s we serve.

Is that petty “turf preservation”? Maybe. However we need some of that. For us to have pride in our profession we need to take the steps necessary to own what we are supposed to own. If we can see our profession lacking the necessary educational background, skills, or just plain old gumption to fix a problem, then we have to band together to do the work needed to fix it. The fact that this service and this system are thinking that having and advertising a “special” truck, “Staffed by Nurses” is a good idea is representative of a bigger problem, and that bigger problem must be handled by our people stepping up and handling our deficiencies so that we can solve the problem. We must improve the education, improve our skills, and improve our public perception so that people trust us beyond just the feel-good perception we have as “life saving” “ambulance drivers”.

You’ve heard me, Justin “the Happy Medic” Schorr, Mark “Medic999” Glencorse, and many, many others talking about EMS 2.0 over the last year. Well, this is part of it. My version of EMS 2.0 involves us paramedics taking ownership of problems like these and taking the necessary collaborative steps to fix them. We have to do just that if we want to advance. Now is the time for us to analyze the problems, dissolve the political boundaries, do the necessary work, and collectively grow up as a profession.

And fixing management philosophies that view us as contemptible morons is first.

One last comment, I got a link in a fascinating article by the Nursing Show ran by my buddy Jamie Davis. You should read it, it’s a good way to see how the nurses take this.

————————————————-

Also, for more of my thoughts on the state of EMS in the State of Illinois, check out “Dear Illinois EMS”

Posted by on April 26, 2010 • Filed under: Administration & Leadership, ckemtp, ckemtp rants, Command & Leadership, Emergency Medical Services, Emergency Nurse, EMS, ems 2.0, ems education, EMS Management, EMS pep talk, EMS rant, EMS system, EMS Topics, Paramedic, paramedic education, politics, potential, pride, profession, professionalism, Training & Development

A Slap in the Face to Paramedics Everywhere?

90 comments

As some of you probably know, last weekend I went to the Fire Department Instructors’ Conference (FDIC) in Indianapolis, IN and I spent a great deal of time wandering the convention floor, looking at cool things and talking to cool people. There were plenty of great things to see and great new things to learn about and I immersed myself in doing just that. One of the things I’m always interested in is looking at the new trends in ambulance design and the manufacturers always have their coolest new vehicles on display to feed my interest. However, while walking the conference floor, I came across an ambulance that did more to tick me off than it did to promote their new vehicle design. Seriously, it was like someone slapped me in the face. Here’s the picture I took from my phone:

 Ambulance Staffed by RNs

Does anybody see anything wrong with that picture? I was immediately ticked off…  I’m talking a level 7 hissy fit. I was livid for quite a while and if you follow my twitter feed, you probably saw the three or four times I TwitPic’d it.

I mean really? They had to put “Staffed By Nurses” in six inch high script on three sides of this thing?

I blocked out the name of the service that runs the ambulance and in all fairness to the manufacturer, this truck is awesome. I would be quite happy to work in this truck although being that it has no bench seat, its usefulness as a 911 truck is hampered by its inability to carry more than one patient at a time. However, I would flatly refuse to work in this truck or for the ambulance service that puts it on the street. I happen to know the service that bought it and I’m trying to avoid naming them directly, but they serve a midsize city in Illinois.

Before you go all West Side Story, whip out your switch blade and zip gun, and prepare to have a dance fight with the nurses out there, realize that I’m not mad at them. Sure, mostly they’re well-paid and have climate controlled jobs inside of well-lit buildings, but they didn’t do this to us. My beef is with the management of this particular ambulance service.

So, let’s say that you’re the manager of this particular ambulance service. Obviously, sitting there in your office you must think that your paramedics and EMTs are contemptible morons who live simply to cause you problems. Furthering your view of the world, you probably think that the rest of the medical profession and the members of the general public in your area view them the same way and simply don’t trust them to provide medical care when it’s like *really* complicated and stuff. You probably feel that everyone would feel safer knowing that their patient or loved one is traveling via the companionship of “nurses” whom you must view as actually being like actually *Competent* and stuff.  

And that’s what this rolling billboard to your contempt of your employees and their profession says about you. It’s a slap in the face to the good men and women you have working for you and there is flatly no excuse for it.

Here’s a tip, anonymous ambulance manager person (AAMP). There isn’t a need to have your precious ambulance be “staffed by nurses” when you have sufficiently equipped and prepared paramedics working in it. Paramedics are acute care specialists. We’re also experts in mobile medicine. Our education, training, and experience prepare us for the unique environment that we create when we move patients from one place to another. Critical Care Paramedics have the intensive Care experience, training, and background needed to operate in a critical care ambulance environment, nurses do not. Sure, ICU and ER nurses are great at Critical Care. However you shouldn’t regularly staff a critical care nurse in the transport environment for the same reasons that you wouldn’t put a critical care paramedic inside of the ICU. The professions are like in a lot of ways, but they’re separate for a good reason.

And you, AAMP, don’t respect that. Perhaps it’s because you’re burnt out. Perhaps it’s because you’ve beaten the system you’ve created into such a pulp that nobody wanted to staff your new Critical Care Truck. Perhaps it’s because of a lot of reasons, but it’s certainly not because you wanted the best in patient care or to show that your employees are capable of operating your shiny new “special” ambulance. No, you wanted “nurses” to “staff” that truck… and not only did you want the medical people you’re contracting with to know this, you wanted everyone who saw the truck to know it as the 6 inch high letters stating that fact clearly show. Do you think that the public views your crews as incompetent? If so, do you think that furthering the notion by advertising that your “special” truck is “staffed by nurses” will help that situation?

If your protocols are so draconian that even critical care certified paramedics cannot be allowed to staff that truck, then your protocol system is in the Stone Age. If your educational system isn’t up to the challenge of preparing your most experienced medics to staff it, then fix that problem. I know that there are great medic/nurse combos out there and I know that flight nurses have garnered quite a bit of respect out there in the world… and heck, I’m not knocking them for doing it. However, this is the time for Paramedics to step up and claim our turf. This ambulance clinched it for me. AAMP, your shortsightedness has caused me to lead a revolution of sorts here. You’re contempt for your staff has indicated to me that now is the time for paramedics and EMTs, such as the ones that work for you, to stand up and start claiming what is rightfully ours. Frankly, AAMP, your ambulance and your attitude is ridiculous and thinking like that must be stamped out right now by the good medics among us.

And I should also say this to the nurses in the audience before you start skewering me for knocking you: Have you looked at the debates in your circles concerning the use of paramedics in the ER and in other hospital units? Have you ever seen the term “Unlicensed Assistive Personnel”? Well I have, and it’s what the upper nursing echelon calls me and my professional colleagues.  It’s offensive, but hey… our jobs are different. You have the hospitals and the fixed facilities. That’s what you do. We have the field. It’s what we do. There’s a line, respect it. If you want to do EMS, go through a real paramedic program. If we want to do nursing, we should go to nursing school. Really, it’s that simple. The transport environment is difficult and requires the use of specialized personnel… which we have, they’re called paramedics. The medical care we provide is close to the care that you provide, except we have autonomy that you do not and we are use to working independently in the environment in which we operate. Your focus is different than mine.  You may be the best transport nurse out there, but even though you personally may be awesome, my profession needs to have people as awesome as you working on our side. That’s what this is about, not to knock your transport nursing skills, but to kick us paramedics in the shorts and get us to step up and maintain ownership of what we should own.

The responses I got back on Twitter show me that there are a lot of like minded individuals out there. Perhaps some of them might work for you, AAMP. You better take that into consideration because if I have my way the paramedics are going to get the notion that we’re not just a bunch of contemptible morons and we’re soon going to take control of our own profession. On that day, managers like you will be obsolete. Perhaps you can get a job managing nurses.

Here is my personal ‘thumbs down’ for the graffiti against my profession that you had someone slather on your shiny new truck, AAMP. My advice? Take it off and reconsider your staffing patterns. What you’re doing is bad for my profession. It affects me negatively, it affects my profession negatively, and it shall not go unanswered.

What do you think?

—————————————————————

Be sure to check out the follow-up to this post “A Slap in the Face? How about a Wake-Up Call?”

Also, for more of my thoughts on the state of EMS in the State of Illinois, check out “Dear Illinois EMS”

Posted by on April 26, 2010 • Filed under: 911 fail, Administration & Leadership, Ambulance, Ambulance Driver, ckemtp rants, Command & Leadership, Emergency Medical Services, Emergency Nurse, EMS, ems 2.0, EMS Management, EMS Motivation, EMS rant, EMS Topics, EMS training, Paramedic, paramedic education, politics, potential, pride, profession, professionalism, Scope of Practice, Vehicle Operation & Ambulances

Red Lights to the Left of them, Blue to the right! – Coloring Emergency Lighting

52 comments

So you’re driving down the road in an unfamiliar state, let’s say that it’s Iowa or Wisconsin, when in your rear-view mirror you see flashing red lights on a big utility truck coming your way. You can’t really make out what kind of truck it is, but you see red lights flashing so you pull over to let it go by. When it does, you realize that you’ve just pulled over for a tow-truck.

Or how’s this? The same thing happens, but it’s a flashing blue light in Colorado. When you pull over, you realize that you just got pulled over by a snow-plow.

I live in Illinois and work between IL and Wisconsin and there’s quite a bit of a difference between the different lighting colors and upon who can use what color light for what purpose. As a volunteer paramedic/Firefighter in Illinois I run a blue light with no siren in my personal vehicle. Even though I rarely turn it on, I have it in case I get stuck behind a 20mph Grandma on my way to the Big One. Interestingly, the blue light gives me no legal authority or any legal leeway on traffic laws and I must obey all traffic laws even while running the light. I Wisconsin, however, volunteer firefighters and EMS people may use red lights and sirens in their personal vehicles. They have the same legal status as governmental emergency vehicles when they’re driving with their lights activated.

In Iowa, volunteer firefighters may run blue lights in their personal vehicles with no legal authority granted them, and EMS volunteers may run clear (white) lights in their personal vehicles. Volunteers for fire and EMS combination agencies may run a mixture of both, however if a person volunteers for both a separate Fire department and a separate EMS agency, they must be careful to run the clear light for EMS responses and the Blue light for fire responses.

Of course, that’s just for personal vehicles right? Allowing emergency lights in the personal vehicles of emergency volunteers is a debatable issue in some circles. I argue for responsible control of their use and think that they are needed in some communities and not needed in others. Out of the 400-500 volunteer runs I respond to annually, I probably turn on my blue light for less than ten percent of the runs. I use it judiciously, but I know others that I can say did not.

However, this isn’t a post about volunteer emergency lighting and the pros and cons of it. It’s about the messed up spectrum of colors that we use on emergency vehicles in this country. Sure, we have the same stock colors pretty much everywhere. Red, blue, amber (yellow), green, clear (white), and in some states purple (Yes! Purple!). In the southern states, blue lights are for law-enforcement only and red is for fire only. In Wisconsin, law enforcement runs red and blue lights and fire and EMS is red only. In Iowa, up until a few years ago everyone ran red lights except for volunteer firefighters. They changed the law and now allow blue on the Passenger side only. In the City of Chicago, the Chicago Police Department runs blue only and the Fire department runs Red and Green. Downstate Illinois (Read: Outside of the City of Chicago City Limts) runs red and blue for all “Authorized Emergency Vehicles” and blue lights for the volunteers. Green lights are only permitted on stationary vehicles for command lights but can also be used for private security officers. As I mentioned before, in Iowa and Wisconsin, tow trucks run red lights. In Colorado, snow plows run blue. In some states, funeral processions run purple.

Confused?  I sure as heck am.

Consider this: Different lighting colors exist because different members of the driving public see different wavelengths of light in the spectrum (i.e. “Colors”) better or worse in differing ambient light conditions. Also, different colors penetrate different atmospheric and/or ambient light conditions better than others. You can see blue forever at night or in the fog, but not so much in the bright light. Red washes out to amber in the day light but is still fairly visible. Clear lights penetrate for a very long way but can be confused with light reflecting off of a surface almost the same as amber lights. We need a diverse spectrum of colors emanating from our response vehicles in order to ensure that the highest amount of drivers out there are able to see the lights. If someone’s color blind to the particular light color that we choose, they’re not going to see us all that well, are they?

The arguments that I hear for the use of lighting colors don’t hold much weight with me. Who cares if the public is able to see that an approaching emergency vehicle is Fire, EMS, Law Enforcement, ASPCA, Haz-Mat, Tech-Rescue, Volunteer, or miscellaneous. They just need to pull over and get out of the way. One color lighting schemes may give the agency a sense of personality or whatnot, but they’re certainly not the safest way to be seen. An emergency vehicle needs to throw out a lot of light across the spectrum of visible colors in order to help ensure the safest response possible.

So why are we having this hodgepodge of warning light colors? Why do people think they’re a good idea? I can think of a few advantages of having “law enforcement only” colors, as in reducing false traffic stops from people impersonating police officers, but having one color and one color only simply makes it easier for a criminal to get a hold of that one color of light. Why fire would only need red lights is a question that I can’t come up with a good reason for.

So good luck driving out there! If you see me, I’ll be on the side of the road letting a tow-truck go by. Then I’ll run my blue light in Wisconsin because we got a house fire in my district that touches the WI state line and I’ll get arrested for impersonating a police officer. Then I’ll be at work getting into a crash because someone driving out there was color blind to the color red.

Anyone want to add to the confusion? What colors do your state or country use? Is anybody else in favor of a national standard?

Posted by on April 7, 2010 • Filed under: 911 fail, accident, Administration & Leadership, Ambulance, Ambulance Driver, Ambulance maintenance, ckemtp rants, code-3, Command & Leadership, drive fast, Emergency Medical Services, EMS, EMS Health & Safety, EMS Management, EMS rant, EMS safety, EMS Topics, Fire Rescue Topics, In the Line of Duty, Iowa, Iowa EMS, lights and sirens, Line of Duty, Management, politics, Technology & Communications, technology-communications-ems-topics, Vehicle Operation & Ambulances, Vehicle Operations & Apparatus, volunteer fire department, volunteer firefighter

Saved by the Bell? High School Student EMS

61 comments

Ahhh, High School. The classes, the lockers, the bells, the peer pressure, the parties, the immaturity, the congestive heart failure, the overdoses, the emergent response, the…

Wait, what?

I’ve been hearing a lot recently about Emergency Medical Technician training being held in High Schools (9th – 12th grades) with teenage high school students being trained to be EMTs. At first blush, it actually seems like an innovative way for communities to meet the EMS staffing shortage problem head-on. In addition, it would seem to be a great way to get young people interested in EMS. In fact, THIS ARTICLE posted recently by Zoll EMS&Fire on their Facebook page seemed like a good idea to me at first. A county partnered with a technical high school in order to train new EMTs to swell the rosters of their county’s services. It’s gotta be a good idea? Right?

Then how about this service in Darien, CT. that is ENTIRELY STAFFED BY TEENAGERS AND HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS? (Dept. Web Site)

Or this service, in Hoboken, NJ that has a student emergency response team that “respond(s) with the school nurse to non-emergency calls”? (additional article)

I have been hearing about such things for a while now and even spoke about it with Tiger Schmittendorf on the March edition of the Firefighter Netcast, however I didn’t give it very much thought until I read the “Last Word” section of JEMS Magazine in what I believe was the March 2010 issue (although I can’t find it anywhere on their web site www.jems.com). It talked about our friends in Darien Connecticut that run Post 53 EMS, a service that is staffed and ran almost entirely by high school students. I was a bit peeved after I read that. Then yesterday when I read the article about the service in Sussex County, I got just plain mad. I don’t agree with this at all. In fact, even though I might have been for it without thinking it through, now I am coming out completely against it.

There, I’ve said it. I am against beginning Emergency Medical Technician training in high school and I am most certainly against persons under the age of 18 staffing ambulances. I also must strongly condemn persons under the age of eighteen responding to emergencies, operating emergency vehicles, or taking responsibility for professional level patient care.

Look at the words there and understand just how much I condemn the actions of the politicians and officials that permit this. You are endangering the public, harming the profession of EMS, and creating a systemic negative impact on patient care throughout the system. You run the chance of increasing patient morbidity and mortality, run the risk of getting teenagers injured and/or killed on an emergency scene, and are exposing youth to situations that they cannot possibly be experienced enough to understand.

I am fully aware that the above paragraph is inflammatory and I am aware that the proponents of these situations are not going to like what I have said, but that doesn’t make it less true. Look for a minute beyond the arguments that you are going to make about the kids themselves, who I am sure are all upstanding young citizens who are surely beyond reproach. Look for a minute even beyond the fact that evaluation of the kids themselves must be taken on “a case by case basis” as I’ve heard before when this issue is argued. T o be certain, there are kids that are capable of functioning to the EMT-Basic level with proper, adult, professional supervision… However, I want to know why there is a perceived need?

The communities that support and offer these plans where students are trained to the EMT level and especially those communities where persons under the age of 18 are active emergency responders generally purport to be offering these plans in order to combat a “shortage” of trained emergency responders. This is where my biggest grievance lies. This “shortage” of which they speak is manufactured. It’s false, and it’s created by the very attitude that causes the local political powers to think that a program that provides a consistent stream of young, inexperienced, naive EMTs who are willing to work just for the “excitement”, “honor”, and “cool factor” that these programs seem to offer is a good idea. Here’s the thing, these communities don’t have a shortage of adult, professional EMTs who are willing to do the job. They have a shortage of adult, professional EMTs who are willing to work for peanuts in a system that has no respect for what they do.

Get it? If you have such little respect for EMS and the EMTs that provide it that you are comfortable letting teenage kids work your trucks, you obviously have such little respect for EMS that you provide horrible pay and working conditions to the point where no self-respecting adult can make a living on the wages and conditions you offer them. There’s no shortage of EMTs willing to provide excellent EMS. There’s a shortage of pay and professional respect that causes them not to be able to survive working the available jobs. Trust me, if these communities paid better and provided better jobs there would be no shortage of EMTs. It’s manufactured by their willingness to just have someone with a pulse and an EMT card on their trucks. It’s manufactured by their thought process that EMS is simply childs’ play and that since “any idiot can do it” they might as well put kids on the trucks. The EMT shortage has always been created by lack of pay, poor working conditions, and an unwillingness of local politicians to provide adequate amounts of these things. Creating high-school EMT programs reinforce this by always providing a stream of fresh meat willing to work for nothing. Young people don’t worry about such things as pay high enough to support a family, nor do they care so much about things like insurance, benefits, or retirement plans. They just want to get out there and go to work. 

I make the argument that putting inexperienced high-schoolers on ambulances increases morbidity and mortality using my experience as an experienced long time paramedic. I offer the full body of research that proves that experienced healthcare providers provide better healthcare than do inexperienced ones. The fact that there’s such little research out there does not diminish the fact that you have no such research that shows safety in what you do. I say that your communities would be better served by adult, professional, well compensated providers. I say that they would save more lives and reduce more suffering than do your high-school kids. It is well known that patients have better outcomes when they trust their healthcare provider and you ask your patients to put their trust in high school students. There are many possible scenarios out there where the patient’s very life and/or death rest upon the skilled interventions provided by an EMT. In these situations, even experienced providers make mistakes. You’re telling me that the incidence of these mistakes will not be unacceptably higher using teenagers?

When your Wife, Son, Husband, Daughter, or friend is lying there, dying on the floor, the roadway, or on the cot, will you feel comfortable with your decision to put a high school student at their side to be in charge of their continued comfortable survival? I make the charge that you will not. Your community members do not need a child coming to them in their hour of highest need. They need a professional, adult provider and your system denies them this.

I support EMS education in high schools. I support explorer programs that give firsthand experience and education to teenagers and younger students. I support CPR and First Aid Training at any age. I will support students coming to the EMS station, cleaning the trucks, taking classes with the crews, learning about EMS, and even staffing first-aid stations and special events under the watchful eye of an experienced adult provider. I do not support students responding in ambulances for the reasons I’ve stated above… but in closing I also offer this:

In one of the articles above, someone stated that these programs prepare students for a career in the emergency medical services. They might. However, by their very existence they prepare students for a career in a low-wage, low respect industry that might as well be provided by teenagers. These programs are a slap in the face to our profession. We will never advance when mindsets like these are allowed to propagate and flourish

Your thoughts?

Posted by on March 29, 2010 • Filed under: 911 fail, Administration & Leadership, ckemtp, ckemtp rants, Command & Leadership, edemse, Emergency Medical Services, EMS, ems education, EMS ethics, EMS Health & Safety, EMS Management, EMS rant, EMS Topics, EMS training, EMT, Ethics, everyday ems ethics, Fire Rescue Topics, Firefighter Safety & Health, medical ethics, politics, rant, Training & Development, volunteer fire department, volunteer firefighter

Huddled Masses. Healthcare. Honor. EMS.

19 comments

A conversation that I had with another healthcare provider has me pondering a lot of things. Until now, I’d been pondering these things in a solitary way but I think that I’m going to put these ponderable thoughts up on the blog.

This post gets a little more political than my usual stuff. I don’t post politics up here unless the politics specifically relate to EMS (unless they’d get me in a lot of trouble, for example the best EMS delivery model).

But today, I’m making an exception. I think that some of the things that I’m pondering have to be put out there and I think that if I don’t throw this out to the blogosphere I’m gonna go nuts.

I work in a community that has a large Hispanic population. A good portion of them are probably undocumented immigrants from Mexico. Yes, I said “undocumented” and that can mean Illegal immigrants if you so choose to say that. It’s a fact that small towns in the Midwest have been growing by leaps and bounds with undocumented immigrants looking to find work wherever they can. Some of them have legal members of their family that they live with, some don’t.

There’s a huge debate going on in this country over illegal immigration. It’s bigger than me, it’s bigger than this blog, and it’s bigger than EMS. I’m not going to get into my personal opinion on the topic as much as I would if we were discussing this in a bar over a couple of beers, or a country cafe over coffee if you’re a morning person. I can say this: I’m all for border security. I’m all for people following the law and I believe that illegal immigration is a drain on our resources. Those points are barely arguable. Another thing I believe in are the words to a song that I used to sing when I was with a rather patriotic small-town childrens’ choir. The song went something like this: “Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe fee. The wretched refuse of your teeming shore. Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me. I lift my lamp beside the golden door!” There’s a lady that stands in the harbor that has these words inscribed upon her, and they mean something.

I look upon this debate and I see both sides fervently trying to destroy any point-of-view other than their own. The lefties want them here because their hearts bleed for them. The righties think that the lefties want them because they can mold them into a new communist workers’ party. Both of them may be right. I am more of the opinion that America is an experiment. We’re a melting pot of people that have come together over the last two-hundred and some odd years to be stronger in our diversity. I believe that any cultural group entering our melting pot should come here and embrace the American ideals. “Melt” into the pot if you will. This has made us strong over the centuries and has built the country that I love, the one I will stand up for. Europe didn’t do that, they isolated their ethnicities into countries and fought amonst each other for a thousand years. We melted and homogenized into a strong nation full of rugged individuals championing their best ideals. I say that the most successful immigrant groups in the storied history of this nation celebrated their old cultures while melting in to our diverse one.

As far as today’s debate goes, I wonder if that would be the whole rub. Are the new illegal immigrants celebrating their own culture while melting into ours? Or our they placing their old culture on top of the American culture and creating discord within a proud nation? I think that we have always accepted the “Tired and poor huddled massess yearning to breathe free” because of our American Dream. People here have equal opportunity, a guarantee of the equal chance for humans to strive to reach their potential. Everyone has the chance to try and succeed to their own definition of success. “Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness” is a guarantee of the chance to pursue. It is not, however, a guarantee of results. Our experiment is that everyone who has the chance will strive to give it their best shot, and that the people who succeed will pull others up alongside them.

I can’t say what’s right here. I don’t know. I don’t want to offend, but here I am, a paramedic. My job is to help everyone and anyone who needs me. I will do so. I have always done so. I took an oath and I honor my convictions. The hypocratic oath means something to me. Healthcare providers are honor-bound to help everyone as much as they can. I always will.

The conversation that we had was short, but he got his point across. I had brought up that while we have a large hispanic population in our coverage area, we rarely have calls involving those hispanic members of our population. I think that this is a bad thing because obviously these people fall ill and get injured at a rate comparable or even moreso than the other demographic groups in our area. I don’t know why they’re not calling but I can figure that it might be alleviated for the good of our community as a whole if we reach out to this population and let them know how, and when, to access the emergency healthcare system. I don’t believe in race and to me “hispanic” is a cultural label and is not even close to whatever “racial” means, but this is a cultural group that should be calling us and doesn’t. It’s deliniated over cultural lines and therefore is handy to address that way.

The other guy thought that it was stupid, pointless, and maybe even wrong to do this. It was because of the “illegal” thing. As strongly as I feel on that issue, and I do have strong feelings, as a healthcare provider my job is to help everyone. Every human deserves the best care that we can give them, every time. I don’t judge people. He shouldn’t either.

Neither should you.

Thoughts?

Posted by on March 25, 2010 • Filed under: Administration & Leadership, Command & Leadership, Economics, edemse, Emergency Medical Services, EMS, EMS ethics, EMS Health & Safety, EMS Topics, Ethics, everyday ems ethics, Fire Rescue Topics, In the Line of Duty, inside the mind of a paramedic, medical ethics, politics, professionalism, socialized medicine, Uncategorized

Trust… It’s everything

4 comments

Dooooo Doooooo! Beep Beep Beep Beep Beep Beep Beep  - Attention AMBULANCE ONE, Ambulance One. Respond Code 3. 1234 Anystreet lane, 1234 Anystreet lane for the (Insert Age and Gender Here) patient found unresponsive, unknown if breathing.

Imagine you heard that dispatch go out just now. Imagine you’re at home, off duty, and just happen to be listening to your dispatch channel. Perhaps you’re a volunteer, perhaps you have a scanner, but picture yourself hearing that and realizing… “Oh My God… That’s So-and-So’s house! A (blank) aged Male/Female? That’s gotta be So-And-So!!”

As an EMS person who lives in your district you know the people who work on the service. Now you’re sure you know the patient too. It’s someone you care deeply about and it sounds like they may be in mortal danger. As someone “in the know” you know what you’re going to do next, right? You’re going to listen intently to whatever traffic happens to come out next on the radio, aren’t you?

“Come on, Come on, Come on!” you think to yourself as you wait the agonizing seconds for the crew to acknowledge the page and go enroute to the scene. “What’s taking them so long!?” you ask yourself. “Ambulance 1 is enroute to 1234 Anystreet Lane” says the crew of Ambulance One over the radio. You don’t think that they sound excited enough. They must not know that this is So-and-So! To them, this is just a routine response for an unresponsive patient. They’re going to do a routine, every day job and perform their routine, every day care. They don’t have any idea that this patient is special to you and they’re going to give this patient the same care they’d give anyone else.

Now, since you’re sitting at home and unable to respond, you’re going to be glued to that radio, right? You’re going to know from the voice on the radio exactly who it is that will be taking care of “So-and-So”. You’re going to either be relieved or horrified by your knowledge of who’s on that responding ambulance. If you have trust in the medic on the truck, you’ll feel slightly better about So-and-So’s chances of survival. If you don’t have trust in the medics, you’ll probably feel a lot worse… right?

It’s always been a sticky ethical situation for a healthcare provider at any level to work on someone they know well and care deeply about. Try it just once, or more realistically for an EMS provider, have the situation thrust upon you, and you’ll see that “Stuff gets real” really quick. We have a vested interest in the care that our loved ones receive and while some of us may know that it isn’t always best that we personally be the one caring for them, we all understandably want them to receive the best care possible.

Trusting a provider to care for your special “So-and-So” is a big deal. I’m sure we all have secret mental lists of our colleagues whom we’d want caring for our loved ones and also our lists of who we wouldn’t. It is a supreme responsibility to be a healthcare provider in charge of the care of any patient and I believe that EMTs and Paramedics hold that responsibility every bit as much as or more so than any other healthcare provider. It is a responsibility that I don’t take lightly and one that I hope my colleagues do not either. We are the first people that our patients and their families want to see walk through their door when the unthinkable happens. When the situation is critical, and skilled, complex, time-sensitive care makes the difference between life and death, we are the ones out there doing just that. A good paramedic must be knowledgeable, highly skilled, and experienced to provide that level of care. Not just that, they must do it every time they get in their truck; because every patient is somebody’s “So-and-So”.

Speaking of “stuff getting real” I have to ask you: What kind of provider are you?

Are you out there every day earning the trust of your peers?

Do you work hard enough, study hard enough, and train hard enough?

Do you do your absolute best for every patient, every time?

When it does happen (and it will) that you are sent to care for a colleague’s “So-and-So”, are you the kind of provider they will trust?

If you think about these questions, you know the answers already. If you can honestly say that you’re good enough, I salute you. If not, well then we have some work to do, don’t we?

Earn it. Study hard. Know your stuff. Do your best. Every patient. Every time.

Posted by on March 15, 2010 • Filed under: Administration & Leadership, edemse, Emergency Medical Services, EMS, ems education, EMS ethics, EMS Motivation, EMS Topics, EMS training, Ethics, everyday ems ethics, Fire Rescue Topics, medical ethics, Paramedic, paramedic education, patient care, Patient Management, pride, profession, professionalism, scenario, Training & Development

The Shine Factor

4 comments

 This is part 2 of a 3 part series on “The Shine Factor”

Part 1 of this series can be found here – The Shine Factor

Part 2 of this series can be found here – What Makes a Great Ambulance Service

Part 3 of this series can be found here – The Shine Factor – Grunts

—————————————————

You know what I’m talking about here. The distinctly subtle, but powerful mix of sights, smells, and sensory input you find when walking into the apparatus bay of your station. The faint smell of diesel exhaust mixing with rubber tires, the musty smell of damp hose drying on the rack, the smells of not-so-clean turnout gear (best right after a good fire), and all of the various cleaning products used to keep the trucks looking their best. My favorite is when I’m just walking in the station for start-of-shift. It’s about 6am and the guys before haven’t gotten up yet to turn on the lights in the bay or make noise. One of my favorite things to do is to walk around the bay with the lights off, with the sun just starting to glint in from the windows onto the dark floors. It’s quiet. I love the first sunlight making deep reflections off of the shiny paint and gleaming chrome. The trucks just seem to be anticipating the day, yearning for the next call to come in. The atmosphere is electric, and quite palpable. You could blindfold me and take me into any fire station in the country and I could identify it just by smell alone. It’s intoxicating. I think that I like it more than my fiance’s perfume. It’s ok, she’s a firefighter too. She gets it.

So, what I’m about to suggest here plays off of that knowledge that we’ve all got… It’s basically an EKG hooked right up to the morale of your organization. I call it the “Shine Factor”.

Fancy name, huh? Yea, I liked it too. I’d recommend that every person who works in any fire station or ambulance base walks into the apparatus bay every time they start their shift. Don’t go in through any other door. Walk right into the apparatus bay with the memory of the favorite time you’ve ever been there. Take a big whiff of the natural aroma and look to see how much your trucks shine. Check the corners for cobwebs too. Then, simply file the information away in your brain and know exactly how the morale of the troops is doing.

Why is this so simple, yet so powerful, and a lot of the time, so unnoticeable? It’s because every organization has grunts, and the grunts carry out the day-to-day operations of your organization. No matter how many policies are written, budgets are adhered to, or strategic plans are championed by administration, the grunts are out there actually performing the duties that make your organization do what it does. If your department is like every department in the country, the grunts have more tasks than just providing service to the public; they’re responsible for cleaning, maintenance, and upkeep of your equipment. The lower and more “gruntish” they are within the organization, the more responsible for the upkeep they are. This is where the Shine Factor comes into play. Every group has assigned or assumed maintenance and cleaning tasks. Administration can formalize it with all of the written plans, paperwork, and task sheets that they want to, but all those pieces of paper ever do is ensure that the tasks are done to the minimally acceptable level. They cannot and will not make the grunts put in the elbow grease required to get that extra shine out of the equipment. My theory is that only happiness and pride in the organization entice the grunts to go above and beyond, to put the extra few swipes with the rag onto the chrome to really bring the shine out. Think about it, when you complete a task and get it looking good enough to pass muster, you could stop… but if you really have the pride and desire to make the equipment look it’s best, you’re going to go get the magic cleaner in the storeroom and clean out the crust around the lug nuts to make it look perfect, to reflect the personal pride you have in the organization and your fellow grunts.

Do you think that the grunts will spend those extra few seconds, minutes (or in my case, hours.. but I’m obsessive) to make that floor it’s cleanest, or that chrome it’s shiniest if they’re ticked off about management’s latest asinine policy or off the cuff directive? I don’t. It’s human nature. It works on a subconscious level across all of the grunts you have who polish your stuff. If the morale of your department is in the tank, your stuff may be cleaned regularly because the grunts will be sanctioned if they don’t clean off the first layer of crud… but that’s usually where it stops. When morale goes down, the shine factor goes down. When morale goes up and people are uplifted, pride goes up and the grunts put forth the extra effort. It affects more than their performance at the station too, it affects how polite they are to the public, how clean and pressed their uniforms and presentation are reflecting your public image, it affects how much personal effort they put into training, and it may very well affect patient and emergency scene outcomes too. You can regulate all that you want, but the beatings never improve morale. The only things that can do that is respecting your grunts and treating them like adults.

I haven’t formally named it, but I think that new officers and/or managers in the EMS and Fire industry who were promoted from the troops arrive to their new posts with a predetermined agenda. I don’t think that they can help it. Usually, it’s from the mistakes they’ve seen their coworkers make on the streets around them and builds especially upon their own pet peeves. They arrive to their managerial desk wanting to “fix” things and usually the result is a lot of new policy objectives and memos. They know who, at least subconsciously, they want to get back at for the aggravation that they’ve caused them over the years and think that the rest of the organization will share their personal pet peeve. Unfortunately, these attempts to “fix” things usually do just the opposite. The new managers with their personal objectives take things to the extreme. They fail to respect that the people who committed the offenses against the manager’s pet peeves are concerned adults that may have very different pet peeves, and they fail to recognize that every single employee’s pet peeve is micromanagement.

To some managers, paper seems to solve everything. If your ambulance turn-around times are too long in your opinion, you create a paper system to fix it complete with a memo and/or a new policy. The crews fill it out, and it’s supposed to make the management and crews aware of the time it takes them and it’s supposed to fix the problem. Got dirty floors in the trucks? Make a “clean floor” policy with a tracking sheet. Got a crew who uses too much gauze? Make a “Gauze Utilization” flowchart with a tracking sheet. Does your station go through too much toilet paper? You see what I mean. While all management wants to create measurable objectives, all employees hate being micromanaged.

Shortly after I got my first management position my boss, the COO, related to me a story about what he did one day when he found a truck that had been left absolutely filthy by a crew after their shift. Apparently this crew hadn’t been running more than usual that day, and had just left the ambulance filthy. Now, what he could have done, being the COO and all, is write an edict to be handed down through the chain-of-command to have the crew reprimanded from on high about the clean truck policy and the proper utilization of cleaning materials. He could have written a memorandum, or even a shiny new “Clean Truck” policy to enforce the rules. There could have been reams of paper and managerial-type fire power brought down on these guys. But that’s not what he did.

When the crew who had left the truck that dirty came back in for their day shift the next morning the COO met them at the door and lead them to their ambulance. At their ambulance they found a whole host of cleaning supplies… and two chairs. The COO then proceeded to have the medics sit in the chairs while he cleaned their entire ambulance, inside and out, from top to bottom.

Unorthodox? Sure.. Effective? Yes. The problem had been attended to, the desire for a clean
truck was reinforced, and the crews saw just how badly the COO wanted the trucks to be cleaned. Now maybe that’s not something that would work at your department, but it sure seemed to at this ambulance service. Maybe your shine factor would be increased if the grunts got the chance to work with the brass on solving problems like this. Maybe myriad policies aren’t the answer, and teamwork and mutual respect are the answer. Maybe communication increases it. Maybe the full realization by everyone within the organization that everyone has their roles and everyone has to be given the tools to take responsibility for what they own increases it.

Until now, this piece has focused on management, but us grunts can benefit from increased shine factor as well. Right now, you need to decide that you’re going to put in the effort to increase the shine factor in your department. Remember, it’s a subconscious thing. Everyone just feels better when it looks like people are taking pride in the department. Everyone from your partner, the guys, the brass, the public… even you. If the grunts make the effort, it can benefit the shine factor too and maybe the other stuff will come along with it. Positive attitudes breed positive results. It sounds corny, but someone’s gotta make the decision to be the positive change in the organization. Even in a perfect situation, if there even is one, someone’s gotta keep making the decision to keep it that way. Let that be you and others will follow suit.

Now get out there and polish some chrome.

——————————————————————-

 This is part 2 of a 3 part series on “The Shine Factor”

Part 1 of this series can be found here – The Shine Factor

Part 2 of this series can be found here – What Makes a Great Ambulance Service

Part 3 of this series can be found here – The Shine Factor – Grunts

Posted by on February 28, 2010 • Filed under: Administration & Leadership, Ambulance, Ambulance maintenance, Command & Leadership, Emergency Medical Services, EMS, ems 2.0, EMS Health & Safety, EMS Management, EMS Motivation, EMS pep talk, EMS Topics, EMT, Fire department, Fire Rescue Topics, Firefighter, Firefighter Safety & Health, Management, Paramedic, PR, pride, profession, professionalism, Public relations

Two Cases, One letter – From one Paramedic’s struggles, change can come

17 comments

A letter I received from a reader recently has gotten me just as mad as he is, even more so maybe. This letter came in from someone who identifies himself as a paramedic but asks that I protect his identity and location completely. I will do so, only identifying that the letter comes from someone who works out west, somewhere between the Mississippi and Montana but not east as Maine or as far south as Amarillo.

So He comes from somewhere in the US, not the east coast, and not Hawaii. He’s a paramedic and he’s male. That’s all I’ll say. I’m going to work the things he wrote me in his letter with my thoughts and feelings on what he wrote and the situation he wrote about. I’ll rewrite the letter keeping the point of it intact. I’m fairly sure that you’ll be just as angered as I. (Note – This is LONG but it’s good. It will probably tick you off too, enjoy)

(more…)

Posted by on February 25, 2010 • Filed under: Administration & Leadership, change, ckemtp rants, DNR, Do Not Resuscitate Order, edemse, Emergency Medical Services, EMS, ems 2.0, ems education, EMS ethics, EMS Health & Safety, EMS Management, EMS paramedics, EMS system, EMS Topics, Ethics, everyday ems ethics, Line of Duty, medical ethics, Paramedic, paramedic education, patient care, Patient Handovers, Patient Management, politics, potential, PR, pride, profession, professionalism, Public relations, rant, stories
Random Pages Widget Created By Best Accountant Services