Skip to content


Who Needs Them Paragods?

4 comments

4/1/2013 – Rhinelander, WI

Calling the county-based ambulance service “A bunch of dumb, know-it-all ‘paragods” Ernie Slater, a local volunteer Basic Level Emergency Medical Technician (EMT-B) dismissed calling for an Advanced Life Support (ALS) paramedic intercept for his patient with chest pain earlier this morning.

“Those dumb paramedics think they know everything” said Mr. Slater, hitching up his belt which in addition to holding up his EMS pants, also held a wide-array of pagers, radios, and EMS tools neatly arranged in holsters. “We show up and we can take people to the hospital. I mean, what more do they really need?”

Mr. Slater, who refers to Lifestar EMS, the county based paramedic service, as “Death Star” recently graduated from his EMT-Basic class at the local community college. He credits his vast amount of medical knowledge to the fact that he took the class three times before he passed it and had a lot of time to learn the information presented to him by the instructors, of whom he added “Were a bunch of idiots who didn’t know nothing.”

“We’ve got high-flow oxygen and can give nitro pills to anyone who needs em” He declared proudly, giving the patient their fifth pill since he assumed their care. Our service says we give them till the chest pain goes away and that’s what I’m going to do. I’m taking this guy to the ER down the street. I mean, what am I going to need those stupid medics for? Nothing.” He added “I got this.”

For his part, the patient, who called 911 this morning after awaking with crushing chest pain added “I can’t really complain about the care I’m getting, but shouldn’t an ambulance guy take the dip out of his mouth before he comes to your house? I’m pretty angry about him spitting tobacco juice on my carpet but how can you get mad at a volunteer?”

Paramedics, who can perform so-called “Advanced” treatments like starting IVs, giving medications, performing airway management techniques, and interpreting EKGs go to school for a significantly longer amount of time than do EMT-Basics. The length of school which Mr. Slater added “was stupid” and “dumb as hell”.  

“Why would I want to go to all of that extra school? I mean, I pretty much know everything they do and I see no reason why I can’t do all of the things like them ‘paragods” He opined derisively. “Starting an IV is easy and nothing they do is all that hard.”

At press time, Mr. Slater was planning to spend his evening hours playing video games at home rather than attending his service’s continuing education classes scheduled for tonight. 

 

Pushing Down the Skills – Bringing New Tricks to BLS

1 comment

A post by Peter Canning, one of my favorite EMS authors who writes the blog “Street Watch: Notes of a Paramedic” has got me thinking. The post deals with what skills we should push down a level or two from the Paramedic scope of practice and allow EMT-Basics to perform in the field. In his very well written article “Where I Stand (Today)” He brings up many of the facets to this complex issue.

You should read the article, but this is my favorite part:

“I guess if I could summarize my position it would be this: The distinction between ALS and BLS should not be an artificial one where BLS gives no medication and does nothing invasive where ALS does. The distinction should be a common sense one made by medical oversight after weighing risk/benefit, cost, and need. BLS shouldn’t necessarily carry a medicine or do an intervention simply because they can. In our current system, they should be allowed to do these enhancements only if there is a demonstrated need.”

“Allowed only if there is a demonstrated need.” I like that statement, even if I can come up with arguments against it in both an academic and practical sense. As I stated some years back in a previous post: “A Late Night Rant about Petty Politics in EMS” there is a hierarchy of things that guide too many EMS decisions, and they’re not positive things, they are:

  1. Revenue Preservation
  2. Area Preservation
  3. Ego Preservation
  4. Political Capital Preservation

Make no mistake. Those four things are at play in this whole debate on what skills should be in the scope of practice for every EMS level. I’d bet that if I were to take an informal poll, most BLS providers would support their being allowed to perform many new skills now considered to be in the realm of the “advanced” provider. I’d also say that most ALS providers would not support giving a lot of those skills to BLS. There would be some disagreement, as some BLS providers would see the additional education required as being burdensome, and some ALS providers would see giving ALS skills to BLS providers as lessening their workload by reducing the number of calls where they are needed. However, I look at it as a very contentious issue.

Mr. Canning is correct when he says that this should not be an arbitrary decision based upon anything other than a demonstrated need and good information, however I can argue against that statement as well. I believe that patient physiology doesn’t change when one crosses a political boundary which is why I’m generally in favor of setting a national minimum standard for our profession. However, I also believe that there are places that have a better mix of available resources than other areas and/or a specific health complaint that is represented in their area and not in others. An example would be in my area of Illinois which is not known for jellyfish stings nor altitude sickness.

I’ve sat in meetings sponsored by EMS educational institutions and listened to groups of EMS and fire chiefs decry the academic standards that dictate the pass/fail standards for EMS students. Not a one of those chiefs ever wanted the standards increased. They simply wanted their personnel to pass the classes. I’ve also had a few EMS system directors make the comments that their protocols have to be written for the “lowest common denominator” of providers… because skills that were too complicated wouldn’t be appropriate for everyone. I say that EMS has an unfortunate downward-pressure on our educational standards as it is yet I agree with the EMS coordinators when they say that there are some EMS people out there who are simply too… dumb? Unmotivated? Non-academic? Oh what’s an appropriate word for it… “unable” to provide the skills that others could reliably and safely perform.

I’ve been on a lot of sides of this issue and I know that my opinion is not any more valid than some others on this topic, as the answer is probably data-driven and I’m not that smart. However I believe that there are skills that should be pushed down to BLS providers that they are currently not allowed to perform. I believe that these skills would most probably improve patient care and have other positive impacts upon the EMS systems in the areas where these skills were moved down. On the same coin, I believe that there are skills that a provider should only attain with the requisite educational background. For instance, the motor skills required to perform a surgical cricothyrotomy aren’t really that hard. If you can carve a turkey or change an oxygen cylinder, you can probably perform one. However, the background knowledge required in order to safely know when to and when not to perform one in favor of any of the alternatives is pretty vast and requires both a lot of experience and education.

Here’s the deal. If you are a BLS provider or someone in charge of BLS providers you should be looking for skills you can add to the BLS scope of practice. You should look first for what benefit will be added for your patients by providing the skill your considering and then look for the risks. All patient care interventions, from bandages to brain surgery have both risks and benefits that must be weighed carefully by someone well-educated before being performed on or withheld from a patient. My opinion is that if a provider’s educational level cannot be reasonably expected to carry the requisite knowledge required for safely performing a skill, than that provider should not be able to provide said skill. Things like BLS IV initiation, BLS narcotic pain medication administration, and BLS endotracheal intubation fall into that category. Sure, there are numerous patients who might benefit from having those skills performed by a provider of lower educational background, but there are many more that in my opinion would be harmed rather than helped by a BLS provider choosing to employ those skills improperly over the alternatives already available to them. Another one of my EMS mantras is that a provider should have “A reason for everything they do, and a reason for everything they do not do” for every patient. These skills are too risky, in my opinion, for BLS providers to perform due to the risk of harming more patients than they help.

On the flip side of the coin, this happens with ALS providers as well. A partner of mine (who, by the way runs a very popular EMS related business and Facebook page) related his own story about bringing a new device to the very progressive medical control system that is in charge of our service. He introduced to them a point-of-care testing device that would obtain lab values such as a troponin and other valuable tests using an easily performed prehospital blood draw. He thought that it would have been useful in cardiac care and help us dial in on both STEMIs with questionable ST elevation patterns and non-STEMIs alike. He was very disillusioned when the medical directors not only denied his request to incorporate the tool, but suggested that instead of using that device “if he really wanted to help” he should place EMS patients into patient gowns before arriving at the ED to make it easier on the ED staff. Would the devices have been helpful in our area? There are a handful of services in the state that use them, but in our area it was deemed to be not useful as we have a number of PCI capable facilities within a half-hours drive of most 911 calls and we would be taking any patient with a suspected cardiac issue to one of them anyway. In other, more remote areas, this is not the case and those services are using these devices in the field to varied success. The point is, when denied with what was considered to be such a flippant denial, our paramedics felt exactly the way I assume EMT-Bs feel when they have to call a paramedic to start an IV.

I’ve said before that there are providers of all levels that in all honesty cannot intelligently debate this issue. This is because “they do not know what they do not know.” Just as it would be unwise to call your neighbor if you were having chest pain and accept their diagnosis that you “probably just pulled something” as your neighbor would have no possible way of knowing, you can’t intelligently debate these topics if you’re not willing to dig as far down into the issue as it takes to fully understand it. That requires education, not necessarily formal education, but education none the less. As an ALS provider I have heard BLS ambulances transport patients who I considered to be in need of ALS interventions without calling for an intercept too many times. I’ve also heard their justifications for doing this and a vast majority of those justifications sounded like one of the four reasons above given to me by people who wouldn’t consider that they didn’t know what they didn’t know about the care the patient really needed. To be completely fair, those providers probably left the conversation considering me to be just another arrogant “paragod” and maybe I am, but I believe in my heart of hearts that I’ve got patients’ best interests in mind.

Also, always remember… there’s a name for BLS providers that have the ability to provide more advanced skills. They were called EMT-Intermediates (now called AEMTs) and they have more skills because they’ve had more education and have been held to higher standards. Come to think of it, that’s why paramedics have more skills than AEMTs do and why Doctors have more skills than paramedics.

This debate is going to continue on for a very long time and many potential paths can be taken. Every single skill that EMS providers at any level are able to perform requires knowledge, practice, and judgment. Each skill should have a thorough risk/benefit analysis that shows clear and real benefit to a wide enough subset of patients without producing undue risk. These skills should be easy to master, carry a low risk of harm, and be either better than the existing treatments or not have effective alternatives. If you’re going to make the suggestion, make sure you do your homework because our patients deserve that we know what we’re doing.

In a later post, I’ll detail what skills I believe EMT-Bs should all be doing. I believe we should expand their scope of practice and I’ll explain how then.

————————————————————

Oh! And could you please look over on the Right hand side of the screen (close to the top) at the voting widget with the picture of my bathroom? I need your help! Please also take a look at the “I need your help!” page up on the top menu bar because I NEED YOUR HELP!

Heat Emergencies for EMS – The Summer Time Blues

2 comments

It’s just about here! Summer time is awesome in where I live. It almost makes those long winter months seem worth it. Almost. With the warm weather close upon us it’s time to review some of the common complaints that EMS providers seem to see more of in the summer time. Gone are the days of frostbite and hypothermia and here are the days of heat stroke and bee stings. It pays to brush up on these complaints because we’ll be seeing them before we know it.

Heat Emergencies

We humans are a fickle bunch. Get us too cold or too hot and we tend to get sick as the dog days of summer. Since there’s little chance of hypothermia coming in the summer, a review of the hotter side of environmental emergencies couldn’t hurt. In emergency care, heat emergencies are generally classified into three levels in terms of severity. These are:

  • Heat Cramps
  • Heat Exhaustion
  • Heat Stoke

It’s important to remember that these classifications aren’t absolute and are harder to pin down when combined with concurrent medical conditions and other factors such as age, gender, and physical health. It’s also important to realize that some physical conditions, caffeine and alcohol consumption, and prescription medications can diminish a patient’s capacity for thermoregulation and precipitate heat injury.

Heat Cramps – Generally occurring in athletes or those undergoing physical exertion in a hot environment, heat cramps are muscle spasms that mostly occur in the abdomen or extremities. (Core temp 99.1-101.3)

Treatment for Heat Cramps includes general medical care, removing the person from the hot environment, providing oral fluid replacement, and cooling them gently.

Heat Exhaustion – Characterized by Fatigue, weakness, anxiety, intense headaches, profuse sweating, nausea/vomiting, and decreased urine output, heat exhaustion is caused by inadequate fluid intake and excessive fluid loss through sweating. It is essentially hypovolemia caused by hyperthermia and may be the result of several days of inadequate fluid replacement and dehydration. (Core temp 99-104)

Treatment includes much the same as the treatment for heat cramps. Do not give oral fluids to patients with a decreased level of consciousness. If your level allows, start an IV and consider a fluid bolus. Begin active cooling with ice packs to the axilla and groin. Monitor the patient’s vitals closely and watch for cardiac arrhythmias. BLS providers should consider an ALS intercept for fluid replacement.

Heat Stroke – This is a true medical emergency and aggressive treatment is warranted. It is characterized by a decreased level of consciousness, increased pulse and respiratory rates, and hypotension. Skin color, temperature, and moisture findings are not reliable but are generally hot and dry. It is becoming shown that patients that suffer near-fatal cases of heat stroke have a strikingly high 1 year mortality rate. (Core temp >105)

 

Treatment for Heat Stroke includes aggressive cooling with ice packs, evaporative cooling, and IV fluids. BLS providers should request an ALS intercept. Rapid transport is warranted. Manage the airway and other complaints such as arrhythmias as per protocol.

Watch your coworkers too. Make sure that your fellow EMS people are staying cool on incident scenes, especially when they may be wearing turnouts or other protective gear. When you're not actively performing tasks that require protective gear, strip it off to allow yourself to adequately cool. Push them to drink plenty of fluids and go to rehab when they need to. Be safe out there and watch each other’s backs. We need you out there.

EMS: Is what you do the Best You Can Do?

11 comments

Not too long ago I was reading an article in Entrepreneur Magazine when I came across an article speaking on negotiating tactics. I wish I could find it, but unfortunately it was long enough ago that I’ve disposed of the printed issue (I subscribe) and cannot find it on the web. It was a good article and it taught me some words that I’ve since used quite a bit in my own life:

“Is that the best you can do?”

From the time our parent’s first put us out there in the world most of us have probably been told to “Do our Best” when we try to do something. No matter if we win or lose, we’ve been told that it’s ok as long as we “do the best we can” while trying. We seem to feel better at the outcome of almost anything if we feel that we’ve “Given our best shot” when we try to accomplish what we’ve set out to do. We all like to do our “best” and we hope that our “best” will be good enough.

This begs the question… is what you’re doing today in EMS “the best you can do?” Career wise, operationally, with your service’s treatments, with your own personal training and education, and with your own attitude… is this really “the best you can do?”

I would like to think that I “try my best” in my own EMS career and paramedic practice. I would also like to think that I work for an EMS organization that is trying to do the best it can for its people and its collective patients. However, there are quite a few situations where I have felt that I have not done or have been prevented from doing my best for a number of reasons. Some are reasonable and others are not. I’d think that all of us would give the answer that we always want to provide every patient with our “best” possible care. However, I’d also guess that everyone reading this can think back to any number of situations where they feel that they didn’t give it. Sometimes this reason comes down to the skill set of the individual provider. This could be a situation where the provider didn’t have the best possible information or knowledge available to them. They may have provided an ineffective or even harmful treatment modality or might have failed to act upon a missed assessment finding, such as by giving a medication for which a patient has a documented allergy because the provider didn’t know or simply forgot that the patient had the allergy. Sometimes the actions of others in the organization can prevent a provider from rendering the best possible care. This could be by failing to check, clean, or restock a needed piece of equipment or by providing inadequate care prior to a provider assuming patient care such as in the case of a first-responder crew failing to place a patient in full c-spine precautions when indicated prior to moving a patient to the transporting ambulance and the transporting EMT not having enough manpower to safely immobilize the patient. Sometimes the organization can hinder an EMS provider from doing his or her best by doing things such as providing inadequate equipment or medical protocols, or by mandating that a provider regularly work past exhaustion-level hours.

People inherently want to do well at whatever they choose to do for their careers as well as at other tasks where they feel strongly about the outcome. I may have accepted that I’ll never be as good of a basketball player as Michael Jordan, nor the same-level of cartoonist as Scott Adams, nor the best noodler in the world… but I’m certainly going to try to be the best paramedic I can be.

THIS guy, however, may be The Best Noodler In the World

Sometimes our own personal biases prevent us from doing the best we can do and for this I’m not talking about bias regarding any protected classes or topic, rather I’m talking about our own version of the status quo. A personal example of this would be my ALS Quick Response Vehicle at work. We went a solid week without having the proper forms available for the daily equipment checks and I didn’t have the computer access to print more off. During that week, I got in the habit of not using the forms and simply checked the truck based upon my knowledge of what was supposed to be in there and what was supposed to be checked. The way it played out, I ended up continuing to not use the check sheets when checking the vehicle, even though the forms had been replenished. A few weeks later, someone found that there was equipment missing in the vehicle that had gone unnoticed for some time. At that point, I realized that I had developed my own bias against using the forms for a reason that is even unbeknownst to me. I had gotten in the rhythm of not using the forms, and that caused me to miss that the infrequently-used piece of equipment was missing. I had developed a personal mental bias that prevented me from “doing my best” and thoroughly checking the truck.

Another preventer of best practices can be organizational politics, both internal and external. As a paramedic who regularly responds to other ambulance services to provide “ALS Intercepts”, I have observed that the politics between the services we work with can affect patient care for both the negative and the positive. While I am not saying that any of these arrangements result in inadequate patient care, I can say that the services with whom I interface most frequently and most pleasantly get a better provider out of me than do the services with whom my relations are less frequent or are strained due to political turmoil. When I respond to a request for an ALS intercept, I am being called to the “house” of another group of providers. While I am the highest level of care on the scene, I’m also a guest in their house. They have their own internal biases and I have mine. Sometimes the synergy in our working relationship can be strained, which results in a palpable difference in the flow of the scene and the teamwork exhibited at it. While I will ensure that I “do my best”, it’s easier to do it when I work well with the team I’m working with.

So how do we change things? We’re all human and we all have things that prevent our “best shot” from being the only thing that we “give it” in our EMS careers. This may be consciously, as in the case of internal politics; Subconsciously, as in the case of my not using the check sheet; or Involuntary, as in our service not providing us with needed equipment or our coworkers failing to replace an item in the ambulance that we did not have an opportunity to check. As in most things, the easiest thing for us to change is ourselves. Changing ourselves is a great place to start and will make serving as an example to others your main tool to use to try and get the best out of them.

Most situations can be made better and almost all of us can try harder. The secret is to attempt to do our “best” at all times and to try and ingrain our own best practices into our daily routines. This can be as simple as always trying to check the truck in the most thorough way possible or by making sure that you always check and recheck things to ensure that they’re done right. It helps to continuously seek out and recognize one’s own personal biases, (remember my check sheet?) to make sure that our own preferences and routines aren’t leading to suboptimal performance. Consistently ask yourself if what you’re doing is the “best you can do” and then ask yourself what you can do to make it your best. Mentally prepare yourself for your shifts with adequate rest when possible, manage your stress level so you can keep your thoughts focused on your care, and train hard. Ingrain your best efforts into the systematic way you do things and make your best way your normal way of doing things. We can’t change everyone around us in an instant, but our quiet positive efforts can pay large dividends in how people around us think, feel, and act. Our best may in turn get the best out of our partner, which may in turn get the best out of the next crew, and so forth. Soon enough… deciding to give our best may change your organization, our industry, or our profession.

And I assure you, doing your best will indeed make the difference in someone’s life. It’s just what we do, Folks.

“Is that the best you can do??

————————————————

For more on doing your best in EMS and in getting the best out of your EMS people read:  The Shine Factor”

Paramedics and EMTs are Special, a salute to the Spork!

12 comments
Ah, the humble Spork. At once it is an example of utility and futility. It is well suited to nothing but bridging the gap between the usefulness of its parent utensils and the burden of having to provide a separate spoon and fork. Sporks are great for when you need to have an eating utensil that is suited to a variety of food consumption scenarios but do not have the space nor the gumption to provide separate utensils. Sporks can perform lots of tasks but they do nothing very well. While I love the concept and the fact that the name is *really* fun to say (Spork? Spork… Spork!!), eating anything with a spork is a challenge. I mean, have you ever tried to eat soup with a spork? You’ll end up wearing a percentage of it. Heaven forbid that you have to use it to hold something you have to cut with a knife like a piece of meat. It’s nearly impossible. I suppose that eating salad with a spork would be fairly manageable but not if you have a lot of non-lettucy stuff in the salad like cherry tomatoes, mushrooms, and/or pepperoni. Honestly, who wants a salad that is comprised only of rabbit food? 

Die hard Sporksters, that's who

However, I digress. What I’m trying to say is that the spork, the half-breed malformation of a spoon and a fork, has its place as a substitute for either when it is not economical to provide both. Like its lesser known brother the “knork”, it is a natural idea and a somewhat cool concept. However, there is a very clear reason that the spoon and the fork are separate utensils. There are specific purposes for the design of the spoon and the fork and good reason to have separate tools that are suited to the kind of tasks that they’re used for. The spork is the watered down version of both. It can somewhat perform the tasks of its parents, but not well. It is the “Jack of all trades, Master of none” if you will.

And that is why I’m writing about our humble friend the Spork in my usual rotation of EMS topics. A conversation I had on Twitter the other day with my tweeps @pgsilva and @rescue_monkey brought up the spectre of why exactly ambulances aren’t staffed with nurses and physicians’ assistants and are instead staffed with Paramedics and EMTs. PG and The Rescue Monkey thought that the conversation would make that vein pop out of my forehead like it does sometimes when I get enraged. They were mistaken. It doesn’t make me angry. In fact, I informed everyone that I would write a post on what exactly it makes me think about. This is that post.

The “Why don’t nurses and/or (insert title of healthcare provider here) staff ambulances debate” has a clear answer for me. Here it is:

EMS providers are sporks. We’re also not sporks. We exist in the realm of both the specific and the generalized. We are jacks of all trades and the master of the non-specific. EMS providers are generalized in nature and that generalization is specialized into the random nature of the work in which we perform.

Or women with sporks, you know. That too.

Are you confused? Well that’s understandable. Let’s look at it this way. The ultimate healthcare provider has always been the physician. Since the beginning of western medicine, the physician has always been the healer that people have turned to. Physicians are learned professionals who seek to learn and apply knowledge to the human condition in the name of healing. Physicians are “clinicians” in the fact that they make a clinical diagnosis based upon an examination of a patient and then devise a proper treatment path to treat a patient’s diagnosis. They physician assesses a patient, makes a diagnosis of the patient’s condition based upon their knowledge base and ongoing research, and then uses that same knowledge base and research in order to devise the best treatment possible for the patient. It’s the definition of a clinician.

Nurses, and their modern incarnation as the Registered Professional Nurse (RN) developed as the ultimate assistant to the physician. Their goal was to be the caregiver, the person with enough medical knowledge to continue the care plan and treatment that the physician determined with the compassion and the ability to meet the ongoing needs of the patient. While the physician devoted their efforts to learning and education, the nurse required less education and more compassion. Medical technology and knowledge has expanded greatly and has required the nurse to develop a vast array of knowledge and a myriad of specializations, but their basic function has remained the same. They care for patients in the long term during their convalescence from an illness or injury.

Physicians and nurses have worked in concert. They have developed a system where the sick and injured are brought to them so they may take care of them using the resources they gather together. Each of them performs their role with the goal of making people get better. As knowledge of medicine has increased, different types of physicians and nurses have developed into specialties. The general practitioner acts as a gatekeeper to specialties and treats the most common maladies and is assisted by nurses qualified to care for the largest population of patients. Specialists, such as Cardiologists, Oncologists, and Surgeons, have developed to allow patients the benefit of having people treat them who have sought out to become experts in exactly the illness that the patient may have. The nurses have adapted and have become specialized in their own right, with nursing specialties that complement the specialties of the physician.

However, there is a drawback to all of this specialization. When you have a malady that affects your feet, you would benefit being under the care of the podiatrist. However, you wouldn’t get the best care possible if the only physician available were a cardiologist. The same holds true for the oncologist that attempts to treat your pulmonary condition or for the proctologist who treats your sore throat. While the basic concepts are there, the specialization of focus is not. To be sure, while a person who has graduated from medical school may be able to treat pretty much any condition that you may have at a level that is basically adequate, specialists have devoted their time in the quest of knowledge in their specific area at the possible expense of their knowledge of other areas. This is a good thing, and it’s the reason that pretty much every hospital is full of people with vast arrays of knowledge in singular topics. This system wasn’t designed. Like capitalism the system designed itself. It works and works well, most of the time. However when economics dictate a limited number of available specialties, certain conditions may be left out.

Nurses have done much the same. While the basic concepts are the same pretty much across the board, a School Nurse would have trouble transitioning into the operating theatre as much as the Oncology nurse would have trouble transitioning into public health. Both of them can probably change a bedpan, start an IV, pass medication, or lend a caring smile in the same manner but the oncology nurse would be much more well versed in the management of chemotherapy drugs and chronic pain management than a would be a surgical nurse.

This brings us to Paramedics and EMTs. We are a profession born out of necessity and forged in battle. Really. We can thank Napoleon for bringing forth the first example of the “flying ambulance” which was a brigade of horse-drawn ambulances staffed by medically trained soldiers. They appeared on the battlefield during the Napoleonic wars and boasted that “No soldier lay with undressed wounds for more than a quarter of an hour”. Battlefield “Medics” have always been on the forefront of emergency acute care in the field. While some examples of ambulance care available to the civilian population exist, in the US it wasn’t until after the Vietnam War that civilian emergency ambulance service became popular and seen as a need rather than a nice thing to have. While physicians often made house calls where they travelled to the patient to provide care, in the interest of efficiency they began to confine themselves in clinics and hospitals where they could more efficiently care for larger patient volumes. With the publishing of the “EMS White Paper” entitled “Accidental Death and Disability: The Neglected Disease of Modern Society”  in 1966, the attention of the public was focused on the need for an effort to extend care out of the walls of the hospital or clinic. The white paper laid out statistics of trauma, stated the need for injury prevention and education, and stated the need for standardization of emergency medical training. The US. Dept. of Transportation took up the mantle of the new Emergency Medical Services system due to the alarming number of fatalities on the burgeoning highway system and modern EMS was born.

"Stick a Spork in me, I'm done" should be part of your daily speech patterns

The EMT and the Paramedic are the equivalent of sticking a spork in the problem and calling it done. EMTs were cheap to train, cheap to employ, and could be widely distributed out there in the field. At the time, it was the perfect solution. Train people in how to perform in the first few moments of a severe injury or acute illness and give them the ability to safely transport a patient to a hospital where the physicians could work in concert to help heal the patient. The nurses, in their role as the assistants to the physicians, stayed in the walls of the hospital or clinic and developed within their specialties. The system grew and developed as the innovators in the field saw more and more acute treatments that could be performed by these new breed of healthcare providers and as the EMTs and Paramedics proved themselves in service.

EMTs and Paramedics are clinicians in the sense that we evaluate a patient and develop a treatment plan that we follow to help them. Our specialty is in the acute, the treatment of disease in the here and now. If it’s happening to a patient and it is directly threatening their life, chances are that an EMT or Paramedic can intervene in a meaningful way. Our specialty is to stabilize and stop the progression of the acute disease process or chain-of-events in an injury that will eventually lead to death. We plug holes and we do it with a knowledge base taught to us by physicians. Our generalization is across the entire spectrum of possible patients, from field delivery of neonates, to jumping in to help stabilize patients in outpatient surgery centers, to taking care of the elderly in nursing homes. Whether a patient is crushed in an industrial machine, is trapped in a rural car accident, is having a heart attack on a baseball diamond, or whatever happens to a person wherever it happens to them, the Paramedic or EMT is the person most specialized in coming to their aid. We gain knowledge and hone experience not just in the treatment of our patients’ medical conditions, but also in the environmental circumstances in which we find them. We may be generalized sporks when it comes to treating any possible injury or acute illness across any patient population, but we’re highly specialized utensils when it comes to treating emergency conditions anywhere at any time.

"Sporks and Phasers" would be a good name for a Rock Band

No other healthcare provider fits into our role… and that seems to make us a full-fledged utensil in my opinion. We are unclassifiable into any other role yet indispensable for our own.

And we need to get out there and let everybody know just how special that role is. Nobody has developed the breadth of knowledge in our specialty that we have. We have made the spork our own.

And that, folks is my answer to why no other healthcare professional can quite full our role. While as a paramedic I am competent in the basic skills needed to say, work in a endoscopy unit, I would not function there to the level of a person experienced and knowledgeable as an endoscopy nurse. Neither would they be able to manage a traumatic airway upside down in a crushed automobile at night as well as I would. It’s my specialty to do the latter, not the former, even though the basic skills may be the same.

For more on this, g’head and read “Any Random Person” an older post of mine. Then get out there and shine up your sporks.

EMS practice

8 comments

Did anyone else play a sport (or sports) in high school? I did, actually I played football for a few years. I was on the line, which in my small high school meant that I played every position on the line, both offense and defense, because there just weren’t that many kids out there to play. My graduating class was 83 in my small, small town.

I didn’t touch the ball though. Coach told me just to go out there and hit people. I haven’t touched a football since.

Every day after school we went out there no matter rain, shine, snow, heat, or better things to do and practiced for three hours every night. We did this all season and I hated it. It sucked and sucked bad. However, it did make me a much better football player. It kept my mind focused and kept me in shape. I was a much better “Go out there and hit people” guy than I would have been had I just taken a football class and then played parts of the game every day.

Does anybody do this with EMS? Sure, we all do Continuing Education, but do we really practice as hard as we should as much as we should?

We play parts of the game every day but just as sure as I didn’t intercept a pass and run in a touchdown every game, I don’t perform a pericardiocentesis every shift. I can plink in an IV in my sleep (and do… a lot…) and I probably can treat a STEMI as good as the next guy. Playing the parts of the game that we do more often than the others gets us good practice on what we do most often, and if we don’t allow ourselves to get complacent, that’s just fine. However, how many times have you calculated a dopamine drip lately? Even if you live in the busiest, most dopamine swillingest jurisdiction on the planet you’ve still interpreted Normal Sinus Rhythm a lot more than you’ve shown off your math chops.

The other day I missed a tube. I was caring for a patient who crashed in front of me while heading to the ER. The Pt went from CAOx3 to very obtunded in a matter of a minute or two. The first time I went to tube, (the Pt) was clenched and by the time I got the etomidate ready we were close enough to the hospital that bagging was my best option. When the Pt got sux and sedate juice in the ER I tried again…. and missed.

I freakin hate that! Man, I never miss a tube! At least almost never. I hate it when I do and beat myself up about it. Probably more hard than I should, but that’s just me. I take this stuff seriously if you can tell. The next shift I spent an hour playing with our two intubation dummies and our “Fred the head”. I tubed over and over again every way I could think of. For an hour. Yes, I know that it’s not exactly like the real thing, but it was all that I had access to for practice.

Something cool happened right after I got done with my hour long tubing pennance. I sat down for lunch and immediately got toned out to intercept a code with CPR in progress. I pointed my SUV towards the rural address and hit the gas. When I got on scene, the BLS crew told me over the radio that they were having difficulty with the airway. I walked in, and got the most beautiful tube that I think that I’ve ever gotten. Right in, right through, and right hole.

I think that my football coach would have been proud.

The Paramedic Intercept – Rural EMS

6 comments

It may shock some of my more urban readers out there, but not everywhere is a city.

Why did I say that? It’s because there’s not much talk out there regarding rural EMS. I live rural EMS and I believe that someone who calls 911 in a rural area deserves just as good of service as someone who lives in the city. To further my goal of increasing the dialogue, I’m writing about some of the issues facing rural EMS and the techniques that we use. Hopefully it’s educational.

Here’s the first part in my series on Rural EMS: The ALS Intercept:

Not every 911 call for an ambulance brings forth a paramedic-staffed Advanced Life Support ambulance. There’s a lot of ground in this nation covered by dedicated volunteer EMT-Basics that answer the call for their communities day-in and day-out. In fact, I got my start at one of these all-volunteer 911 EMT-Basic squads. We covered 275sq miles of sparsely populated terrain in the rural Midwest and ran about 200 or so calls for service per year. I have to say that it made me a very good basic, because there wasn’t any back-up for our BLS skills. However the patient presented, they got treated with the best that our Basic Life Support ambulance had to offer.

Of course, back then we had an ace in the hole. The big-city hospitals that were 45 minutes away at a minimum laid in the service area of ambulances with paramedics in them that could be called to head out our way and meet up with us for an “ALS intercept”. It still happens that way in a lot of communities, in fact, I ride around in an “interceptor” while at one of my jobs, which is an SUV with lights, sirens, and a full complement of ALS gear in it. Working out of that vehicle I respond first-due in our own jurisdiction and upon call for some of the surrounding communities. We meet up either on scene or enroute, and I hop in to dazzle the crew with a stunning display of ALS-sy goodness.

I have to tell you, I remember that from the perspective of an EMT-basic racing to the meet-up point with an “Oh-My-God” critical patient, having the paramedic jump on board was such a feeling of relief. Now, from the perspective of the paramedic who jumps in, it’s sometimes a bit of a pucker factor… because now you’re working with an unfamiliar audience watching your every move.

ALS intercepts are a great tool in the arsenal of rural EMS systems. There are a lot of small communities out there that do not have the capabilities to staff and support full paramedic ambulances. Even if they have the money to pay for all of the equipment and training needed for paramedics, they may not have the call volume needed to keep the paramedics busy and their skills sharp. That’s why consolidating the paramedics and sharing them between multiple services makes sense to me. The community volunteers respond as an initial stabilization, and a faster, more mobile unit runs out to meet them with higher skills. It’s a truly tiered response system.

Rural paramedicine and rural EMS take a different mentality than does urban EMS. For instance, the distance that we must cover mandates long response times. At my previous all-BLS service, we covered the 275sq mile 911 area out of one station. We had under 5000 people in that jurisdiction and that made staffing more than one ambulance infeasible. To cover the gap, we had outfitted volunteer EMT-Bs as “Satellite” First Responders to augment the response. It worked… if they were home or in the area.  Nonetheless, the response times went up to and over 30 minutes in the most remote areas. “Call Early” and “Call First” were necessary philosophies for the community. In addition, the longer transport times made necessary some long protocols that had lots of tools in them to keep the patients stable for the long time we were with them.

Today, I respond to my calls with some of the most advanced EMS protocols that I know of in the region. For example our service and our resource hospital is committed to meeting the AHA’s goal of a 90minute symptom onset-to-balloon time for STEMIs (ST segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction or, the classic heart attack) this requires either ground-bypassing the closest community hospital ER by almost an hour to make it to a hospital equipped with a cath-lab. Most urban services that I’ve worked for carried Nitroglycerine, Aspirin, and Morphine for these cases. For our rural protocols, we add Nitro Paste, a bolus of Heparin, and IV Metoprolol. We also carry transport ventilators on the trucks to free-up a pair of hands from bagging during the long transports with minimal personnel. It takes a strong and independent paramedic to be able to handle anything that’s thrown at them as a single medic. It takes a very strong an independent medic to handle it with an unfamiliar team of EMT-Basics in unfamiliar circumstances.

The relationship between the ALS provider and the EMT-Basic services that they support must be strong in order to be effective. There has to be a high-level of trust between both organizations and the providers working within them to keep the service level high. Holding joint trainings and understanding that everyone has a role within the continuum of patient-care is necessary. Dispatch protocols that pre-deploy ALS resources make a difference as well and take the responsibility off of the BLS provider to make the decision on whether the ALS response is necessary. I personally subscribe to the idea that it is good to be proactive with ALS dispatch protocols and in addition to sending ALS to the obvious complaints, such as Unresponsive patients, Chest pains, and difficulty breathing calls; it is also a good idea to send them ALS to non-specific dispatches such as the unknown medical. BLS providers that arrive first can always cancel the responding ALS if they determine that they’re truly not needed.

And always, always, always… the ALS and BLS providers must check their egos at the door and realize that what’s best for the patient is the most important consideration.

The ALS intercept is a great tool that extends the reach of paramedics into areas where we can’t be effectively based from. It takes work, but it’s good for our patients and our communities. Rural EMS takes different strategies, and this is a good one.

What are your thoughts on this?

Will your career survive a decade or more in full-time EMS? Take this three question quiz!

13 comments

This is a simple test that you can use to see if you have the proper mindset to make it a decade or longer in this insane profession we call EMS.

NOTE TO NON-EMS PEOPLE: This post is geared especially to those in the industry. It explores humor that we employ to keep us with a healthy degree of insanity. If you’re not in the industry and you find this to be disagreeable in some way… well then in the words of Motorcop: “You’ve got the wrong frikkin’ blog pal!” Go read about scrapbooking or something.

This is a simple three question blog based quiz that you can use to determine if you have the right mindset needed to make it more than a few years in this crazy, wild profession we call EMS. If you fail this quiz, um… well then you should tear up your EMT card immediately or not. Nevertheless, if you find this at all funny, you’ve come to the right place. Howsabout that?

Question #1:

You’re working a service that employs two paramedics per day to support BLS ambulance crews in your jurisdiction and beyond. The other paramedic on duty with you that day responds to a neighboring jurisdiction and manages to resuscitate a patient in cardiac arrest. He transports the patient on-board the BLS ambulance to the local community hospital that does not have ICU admitting capabilities on site. Shortly after he transports the patient to the small ER he contacts you asking you to respond down with the ambulance to stat-transfer the patient to a tertiary ICU approx 1.5hrs away lights and sirens. The patient’s got three drips going, is receiving bolus cardiac meds, is on a ventilator, and is not doing well. The ER doc wants the patient outta there as soon as he can get him reasonably stabilized for emergent transport. Oh, and before you ask, the helicopter’s not flying due to weather. You’re it, Buddy.

You arrive at the ER with your EMT-Basic partner and um, you’re “enthused” about the “challenge” you’re about to face. Walking into the ER you hear more than the expected commotion coming from the patient’s room. You enter the room to find the ER staff performing CPR and attempting to resuscitate the patient after he went into cardiac arrest again. You and your partner assist, but despite everyone’s best efforts, the patient unfortunately expires.

When you return to service and get back to quarters, you expect your coworkers to:

  1. A.      Be supportive and consolatory, understanding that you’ve just been through an intense, traumatic experience.
  2. B.      Make fun of you and suggest that you’re an incompetent paramedic because, after all, the other paramedic “saved” the patient… then you showed up and killed him.
  3. C.      Insist that you’re an agent of the grim reaper and pin up another chalk outline with a line through it on your “Bulletin Board of Death” they’ve got going.

Question #2:

Your rural ambulance responds to a local community health clinic for a “Woman in Labor”. Upon your arrival you find a 36 week pregnant female Gravita 3 Para 3 (3 Pregnancies, 3 live births) with contractions 5 minutes apart. The physician wants the patient transported to the local OB unit that is 45minutes away lights and sirens. You load the patient in the ambulance after assessing the patient and find that she is an otherwise healthy pregnant patient possibly in early labor. You initiate ALS care including o2, an IV, and an ECG monitor for good measure. Your partner points the ambulance towards the hospital and you take off lights and sirens. Ten minutes into the transport, the patient’s bag of waters ruptures and the patient states that she urgently feels the need to push.

Do you:

  1. A.      Tell your partner to pull the ambulance over to the side of the road in a safe area so that he can come back and assist while you pull out and open up the OB kit, preparing for imminent birth.
  2. B.      Administer a fluid bolus in the hope that you can slow the imminent delivery.
  3. C.      Calmly tell your partner to “Drive it like he stole it” and coach the patient in “trying not to push” while you try answer “B” and hold her legs firmly closed because hey, who wants to clean up afterbirth all over their ambulance?

Question #3:

You’ve just returned your ambulance to service after a mundane call on a particularly busy day. The other ambulance in the jurisdiction has not had a rough of a day as you’ve had and was out getting lunch when you returned to the station. Before you have the chance to radio dispatch and let them know that you’ve restocked and are back in service from the previous call, the tones drop for an unresponsive male patient that sounds like he has a severe lower GI bleed. Although you’re probably two blocks closer to the call than the other truck, they are dispatched because you haven’t gone in service yet. Their most direct route to the scene puts them right past the front of the station where they’re sure to see you on their way by.

Do you:

  1. A.      Call dispatch on the radio and inform them that you are indeed in service and will respond to the call if they wish you to do so.
  2. B.      Quick, hide! Close the station door and pretend that you’re not yet back in quarters. They deserve to get the call, they’re only out two blocks farther than you are, and you don’t want them to see you and know that you’re ducking it.
  3. C.      Run out to the front apron of the station and smile and wave as they drive by! Hiiiiieeey!! Enjoy the butt bleeder! Don’t forget to write!

Extra Credit Question:

                How many fingers do you think that the other crew will wave back at you with when they pass you in the previous question?

Answers:

If you answered mostly “A’s” – Congratulations, you’re a new, competent, caring EMT. Feel proud of yourself, but you’re probably not going to retire from this job. I could be wrong… but you’re pretty straight laced. Have fun with that.

If you answered mostly “B’s” – You’ve been in the business a while, haven’t you? You’re well on your way to developing the hard outer shell you’ll need to survive for a while in this business. Just don’t lose your gooey center.

If you answered mostly “C’s” – Um, you’re one of my coworkers, right?? Guys, come on… Why’d you go and dump a bucket of water on me last night while I was sleeping? If you’re not one of my coworkers, e-mail me and I’ll send you an application. You’ll fit right in.

Someone Failed… Is it the System? Everyday EMS Ethics

5 comments

A tempestuous night is blowing outside the station walls. The cold night air is stirred wildly, blowing splatterings of rain against the glass window of my bedroom. The wind howls through the trees conjuring up fantastic images of the disturbed environs of the world outside my bunk room. Having gone to bed early, I cannot remember the dreams I must have been having but judging from the fact that my sheets were in such disarray when I awoke, they must have not been pleasant.

I awoke to a familiar but unwelcome voice, the night shift dispatcher coming from my radio. He spoke of a seizure in the next town over. The local ambulance service from that jurisdiction was calling for a paramedic to intercept and assist them with their call. I was due, it was my turn to be ripped from the warmth of my bed and respond to their aid.

I pulled on my clothes and zipped up my shoes. Since whomever controls the seasons in my area has decided to outright skip Fall and move straight to Winter I pulled on a jacket as well. Stepping out into the night air I halfway expected there to be a late September frost on the ground. As I started my truck and keyed the address into my GPS I cranked up the heat to stop my shivering. Hopefully this wouldn’t be too challenging for me in my sleep deprived, freshly woken up state. Hopefully I can wake up enough to safely drive. I shook my head violently to clear the sleep from my bleary eyes and keyed up the mic:

“Dispatch, Medic 84 is enroute to intercept Anytown”

The night shift dispatcher answered me and I switched to Anytown’s frequency:

“Anytown, Medic 84 is enroute to your scene”

With the red lights flashing over my SUV I pointed out into the deserted city streets. Anytown was about ten miles away from my station over country roads. The address was a few miles into their city limits. Curiously, the address they called me to was just a few short minutes from Anytown Hospital and it was strange that the EMT-Intermediate volunteer service had called me to an address where they would usually just scoop and run ILS to the ER. I figured that this must be one of those “Seizures” where the patient seized because of the fact that their heart stopped. People will oftentimes have a seizure when their heart does something funky, like stop, and blood flow is slowed or stopped to their brain. An old paramedic instructor I had once put it this way “Brains need blood flow to be happy, stop the blood even for a second, and the brain gets pissed off”. Everything seemed to get pissed off to that guy. An MI causing arrythmia was a “Pissed off heart”. Diabetes was a pissed off pancreas. A drunk at the bar was pissed off at his liver and so forth.

I wondered what this patient had that was pissed off for her.

The roads were open but the night was pitch black. The wind was blowing my small SUV in all directions but straight. Thinking that this was probably a bad call, I pushed the gas as hard as I felt was prudent with the driving conditions. I didn’t meet any traffic to get in my way. Just as I was coming into their town, a familiar voice crackled over Anytown EMS’s frequency:

“Medic 84. We still need you to respond but you can slow it down to non-emergent. We’re short an “I” and it’s going to be you”.

Ohhhh, so they couldn’t staff the truck fully and responded using me to make their full crew. Now I understood. Anytown EMS is a good service with dedicated people, but sometimes even the best volunteer service needs a hand. That’s what mutual aid is for. We have an arrangement with them in such circumstances so that our intercepting paramedic can make up a full crew for them by partnering with one of their EMTs.

I turned off the lights and just cruised silently through their deserted town. Yes, I popped the lights on momentarily to get through a couple of stop lights, but who’s counting, right? Arriving on their scene the EMT came out to me and said:

“You don’t need to bring anything. This is her third ambulance ride in 24 hours. She spilled a glass of water and (a family member) called because she thought she was “having a seizure” and needed to go back to the hospital”

Oh, now I remember this address. I don’t even work for this town and I’ve been here like umpteen times this year. The patient is one of their frequent fliers. Every community has them. I swear, without our frequent fliers we’d be short like a thousand annual calls. Think of the sleep time I could get.

Climbing up into the ambulance, I met the patient for the umpteenth time this year. She was in no distress and this is where her part in the story ends. My question isn’t about her. Honestly, the question here could be about any frequent flier in any community that has an ambulance response.

Why do we have them? Why do they depend on us so much?

The patient in this example had been to the ER twice already in the previous twenty four hour period, both times being transported by EMS and both times being taken home in a private car by family. Both previous times she had called her General Practitioner physician and had been referred to the ER because she said the word “seizure”. I can hardly blame the GP for recommending she call 911 rather than phone triaging her and suggesting she come into the office. But remember, it’s not about her. I can think of probably ten patients right now that I would consider to be among my personal roster of repetitive patients (I only have ten fingers) and their use of the emergency healthcare system for management of their chronic complaints is staggering in comparison to the use of it by the general population. Last year, every shift for two months we would respond to the same gentleman’s house to wake him up by popping in an IV line and giving him some D-50. We got pretty tired of it, as you can imagine. Most people with diabetes manage their illness pretty well and only occasionally need the assistance of an ambulance crew. This guy chose to manage it by drinking hard alcohol. I swear that I wanted to just leave the IV in place so that I wouldn’t have to start one the next day.
We fixed it by refusing to treat him on scene and release him anymore. It is common practice in my area to “sweeten up” a comatose diabetic with low blood sugar by popping in an IV and giving IV sugar (D-50), or in milder cases, by giving them high-sugar foods and making them eat until they regain full mental faculties. Once they regain their senses, all but a few of these patients sign a refusal of treatment form and do not wish transport to the ER. However, for this patient, we would find him unresponsive, so we would pack him up, move him into the ambulance, start the line and sugar him up while enroute to the ER. Once we were transporting, he couldn’t refuse to go and would end up at the ER for hours. Finally, he started managing his diabetes better because it was more convenient than waiting at the busy, urban ER we would take him to (yes, it was the closest. I work in many different jurisdictions).

However, the above solution just passed our problem we were having with the ambulance response onto the already overburdened Emergency Room. Yes, it “solved” the problem by increasing the patient’s level of personal inconvenience (although we still go to this guy about once or twice a month), but at what cost?
Who or what is causing the failure for these people? Who or what is causing the failure for this whole patient population? Is it the system that fails to adequately educate them on how to properly care for themselves or cure their ailment? Or is it the patient who is unwilling, or incapable of caring for themselves?

For both of the above named patients, socialized medicine already exists for them. They’re wards of the state as far as healthcare is concerned. One of them owns a house, one of them is in a free, government subsidized apartment, one
is in one state, the other is in another. You and I pay for their healthcare and almost their every need.

Is this the system’s fault? Is it their fault? Who should pay for the failure?

I’m writing this after coming back into my bunkroom and finding my sheets and blankets twisted into a ball. Everyone else in the house is snoring because of the abrupt weather change. (and DDex, if you read this YOU FREAKING SNORE WORSE THAN NACHO!) Whatever dreams I was having before this call came out must have been strange.

Until the next…

—————————————-
Update:

My blogger buddies Happy Medic and Medic999 took off from this post and wrote their point of view on their respective blogs. Here they are. Join the discussion.

Alternative Circulatory Access Strategies – Hi Ho IO

6 comments

A while back ago, Steve over at http://theemtspot.com wrote a great post on Gaining IV Access. In the post, he’s got some great strategies for getting your IV starts every time.

But, as we all know, sometimes you just can’t get the darn catheter to go into that tiny vein for whatever reason. Try as you might, it seems like you’re going to be turning the patient into a pincushion before you establish your IV access. Sometimes that’s fine, when the patient is pretty much stable and you just need access. But when the fit’s hitting the shan, you’ve got to step it up. Luckily, our friends in the medical product industry have been working hard to beef up our firepower.

My favorite alternative way to make holes in people’s circulatory system is this:

The EZ-IO or, the intraosseous Drill, is a great way to get a big circulatory access point in a hurry. It’s stable, it’s reliable, and works in a hurry. I’ve used it and we carry it on every ambulance that I work on. I don’t do paid endorsements, but if the company that made this wanted to offer me a ridiculous sum of money to endorse this product, I would.

Intraosseous infusion was just for pediatrics when I first got into the game. We carried the Illinois bone marrow aspiration needle and used it for bad peds. We still do, and the thought of jamming that big ol’ needle into a baby’s tibia still gives me a touch of the heebie jeebies. However, I have to say that it’s one of those things that is absolutely needed when it is indeed needed. Adult patients weren’t so lucky. Before the EZ-IO came about if we couldn’t get a vein in the field with an IV cath on a critical patient, chances are the patient would have to wait for a central line in the hospital. Sure, we can attempt access in the external jugular vein one time and we can always give endotracheal doses down an ET tube in cardiac arrest situations, but I don’t really like any of those methods. The EJ because of the risks involved, and the ETT method because I’ve never really seen it be effective nor read any really positive research on the method.

Now, with the EZ-IO that’s changed. For our service, with cardiac arrest save rates between 40 and 60% depending on the literature you’re reading (Really. www.callandpump.org) most of our medics don’t attempt an IV on a code. If they, or I, am the only advanced level provider, the patient is “drilled” right off and that is our only circulatory access point during the initial resuscitation effort. If there is an EMT-IV tech, EMT-Intermediate, or an additional paramedic present, I will attempt one AC IV placement or direct it to be attempted, however I will most likely drill the patient for secondary access. For most truly critical patients, I place two IV sites. One is capped and acts as a backup site unless aggressive fluid resuscitation is needed or another provider takes over the medication part of the resuscitative team.

There’s been only one study that I’ve found on the effectiveness of the EZ-IO… and yes, this comes from the manufacturer’s web site… but I give them a modicum of credibility because they’re not selling something that hasn’t been around for quite some time as a viable method.

Q. Is IO better or just equal to IV for fluid, drug delivery?

A. The only human IO pharmacokinetic trial reported that IO flow levels are equal to that of IV as supported in the ACLS guidelines issues in December 2005.  Drugs injected into the IO space of the tibia, sternum and humeral head all reach the central venous circulation within one second which is faster than drugs given through IV in a low flow perfusion state

and this:

Q. What are the risks with this product – infection, leakage, bone not healing?

A. The documented overall complication rate associated with intraosseous insertion and infusion is less than 1 percent.  Potential complications include extravasation (leakage), dislodgement of the needle, compartment syndrome, bone fracture, pain related to infusion of medications/fluids and infection.  To date, there have been no reported complications from use the EZ-IO® product system. Overall IO experience in thousands of children and 4,000 adults show the infection rate to be less than 0.6 percent and those are usually not serious and can be treated as outpatients.

Medical mumbo jumbo, I know. I just love this tool. You should have it and use it too. I’ve seen it save lives, save outcomes, and make life much easier on poor, overworked paramedics.

Of course, that’s not to say that there aren’t alternative IO tools out there. I’ve been through a class on the BIG: Bone Injection Gun, and while I’ve heard generally positive things about it, I’ve never used it personally. I also have not had the chance to use the sternal IO access device (I believe it’s called the FAST Sternal IO) however, I found this video on it that came from the military medics that do use it.

Yes, that guy is CONSCIOUS.

Yes, it gives me the heebie jeebies to watch that. I’ll let students practice their IV skills on me… but A FREAKING STERNAL IO!? Those military guys have my respect, because they’re crazy. He didn’t even whimper when another guy was JABBING 6 NEEDLES INTO HIS BONE!

Although, I did get tazed for love one time. I guess I’m crazy too.

Thanks for reading, y’all.

2 comments

The Happy Medic does a great bit on his blog entitled: “You make the call”. In these posts, he lays out a situation and invites the audience to comment on what it is that they would do.
As a currently ill paramedic/blogger, I think that I can do this too. You see, today is my first day back to work after my recent illness. I thought that I was mostly over it and well on the road to recovery… until this afternoon when a rather explosive gastrointestinal thing happened that I won’t get into other than to say um… oh, I guess this happened to a “friend”.

Yea, a “friend”.

Anyway, so you are driving around town in your ALS intercept vehicle talking to your friend’s wife… Um, I mean your wife if you are the friend (this is confusing) when you hear a neighboring service that you would be due to respond to for ALS assistance get a call for a roll-over auto accident on a rural highway. Nobody is on scene yet and you don’t know if they’re going to need your paramedical skills because they’re about ten to fifteen minutes from making the scene.

Then it hits you… the explosive gastrointestinal thing. (I mean, it hits your friend)

What do you do?

Do you float towards the call in the chance that they might need you for the wreck and take the chance of an unfortunate gastrointestinal incident?

Or, do you beat feet to the station and fix your immediate medical condition so that an unfortunate personal gastrointestinal incident does not, in fact happen? Who knows if they’re going to need you, um… I mean, need your friend.

You make the call…

————————-

They didn’t need my friend, and all turned out to be well when my friend went to the station. Good thing there are lights and sirens on those trucks

Related Posts with Thumbnails

Random Posts Widget created by Best Accountant Services