Archives for ems-2-0

A few years back I had the chance to drive a 1997 Saturn 5-speed coupe for a while. It was a pretty nice car and I drove it back and forth on my tri-weekly 2 hour commute from the Quad Cities of IL to the Chicago Suburbs for my 24hr ambulance shift. It actually worked out well because the pay for paramedics was so much higher in the Chicago area than it was where I lived. I’d go up, do a 24 or a 48 hour shift, and have plenty of time to work my other jobs back home. I didn’t really mind the drive but I’d save so much money by driving the Saturn instead of my full-size truck that I’d drive it whenever the ex-gf would let me.

One thing about driving the highways around Chicago is the incessant amount of toll-booths that one must cross while driving there. There are literally more toll-booths than I can count and every one of them requires a person to get out of traffic, stop, and pay the toll. It’s annoying in a car with an automatic transmission and even more annoying with a manual transmission. It aggravates me to say the least.

One of the features of the 97 Saturn SL 2 Coupe is an automatic window roller downer (is there a better name for that?) where the window will roll all the way down with just one click of the button. It was actually pretty handy for going through a toll-booth in a car with a manual transmission. I could click the button, then focus on downshifting for the quickest stop possible. This feature is common on cars nowadays, but back in the primitive turn-of-the-century it was my first Automatic Window Roller Downer Feature and I thought it was pretty cool… Except for one problem:

The window only went down automatically, It wouldn’t roll back up with only one click and had to be *manually* automatically rolled back up again. Yes, by this I mean I actually had to use one whole finger to hold the button. It was kind of a minor annoyance when I had to reaccelerate while shifting the manual transmission. Back then I didn’t think it was a huge annoyance, mind you… but I thought that the simple addition of an automatic roller back upper feature would have been much better. I could just imagine that the simple change would make it more useful and I was a tad angry about the shortsightedness of the engineers. I mean, why couldn’t they have thought of this when it seemed so obvious to my 20yo self? If I had thought of it had to be a good idea, right?

Well then some years later, I rented a car that actually had both an automatic roller downer feature *and* an automatic roller upper feature. I was so happy to find that! It was SO COOL! Finally the engineers had listened to my private thoughts that I never shared with anyone and put in my feature! I was happy.

Then I tried it for a while… and it sucked.

Yea, having a “one click” roller upper feature means never just cracking the window open a bit. One click may bring the window down a touch, but the auto feature keeps it rolling down all the way. In the previous design, without the automatic roller upper, this could be stopped by one quick click in the other direction. However, with the automatic roller upper feature, the window just rolls back all the way up! Getting the window open just a little bit is nearly impossible. Then I thought that if a kid or a less-than-intelligent adult chanced to stick their head through the open window and the button got depressed, the window could roll all the way up and choke them. The automatic window roller upper feature is annoying as heck and wasn’t the great idea that I thought it would be. It was an idea that I didn’t think all the way though. I thought I was smart and well, I wasn’t. It’s probably a good idea that I didn’t get all fired up and start a national letter writing campaign to lobby the car companies to put in automatic window roller upper features (Which I would have urged them to rename to “Chris’s Awesome Mega RoLL uPPahhz”) because then I would have looked like an idiot to more people than just myself. It’s the reason why I rarely orchestrate nationwide letter writing campaigns: experience.

This got me thinking about all of the ideas that I’ve had about things in EMS and in other aspects of my career that I didn’t think wholly through. Steve Whitehead, the genius behind http://www.TheEMTspot.com wrote an article recently that spoke of the fatal flaws in the heroes of Greek Tragedy that I really liked. You can find the article here “8 Tragic EMS Behavior Flaws to Avoid” (I’ll link it at the end too, because you really should read it) but here’s what struck me so blatantly in the article:

The Critic – “This is all so stupid”

This is perhaps the easiest of all the hero flaws to slip into and the toughest to shake. The critic is convinced that the world desperately needs his or her opinions on the way things ought to be. They figure out that offering opinions is so much more fun and rewarding than working to solve a problem and then it becomes like a drug. Soon they’re framing everything they see with the question, “How should this be done better?” and then offering their sage analysis. Usually with a poor understanding of why the thing is the way it is in the first place.

The problem with the critic is that they genuinely believe that the world wants to hear their endless assessments and when an army of engineers doesn’t show up to start doing the hard work of implementing all their great ideas, they get frustrated. The second problem is that they jump to analysis without seeking to ever understand the nature of the problem. Research and implementation are hard, but critical evaluation is fun and easy. As long as they don’t build anything real, they never have to worry about the next critic showing up, spending a few minutes looking at what they built and offering up their sage criticism.

This is the part of Steve’s article that really got me thinking. Have I been “The Critic” too often in my career? I mean, I don’t try to do this… but I find faults in a lot of aspects of contemporary EMS. I look at things and try to find ways to make them better. If you’re a regular reader, in-fact, that’s probably why you come to read what I have to say as often as you do. New ideas are great.

However, as my Automatic Window Roller Upper debacle (that yes, wholly occurred only within the boundaries of my own cranial cavity) has shown, some ideas that come to me and seem so obvious can also be bad ideas. My experience has proven to me time and time again that I need to think things through. I try, but EMS doesn’t always allow us the time to consider all options, let alone every aspect of every option. The Law of Unintended Consequences abounds and rears its ugly head quite often.

As the years have drug on, I’ve been trying to analyze my “Great” ideas more fully, but one person rarely has the ability to completely devise the correct answer to every problem. Two heads are better than one a lot of the time and systems have a way of developing themselves.

So as we go forth to change this thing we call EMS and usher in the new world of EMS 2.0, let’s remember to consider as many reasoned opinions as we can. We need your input and we need your participation. The more we grow together, the better our ideas become.

Oh, and here’s that link to Steve’s Article again: “8 Tragic EMS Behavior Flaws to Avoid”

Posted by Ckemtp on August 16, 2010 • Filed under: Administration & Leadership, Command & Leadership, EMS, EMS Management, EMS Motivation, EMS Topics, Emergency Medical Services, Fire Rescue Topics, Firefighter, Paramedic, Training & Development, ckemtp, ems 2.0, grumblemedics, inside the mind of a paramedic, paramedic education, training-fire-rescue-topics

What is the next “Low Hanging Fruit” of EMS 2.0 and of US Healthcare Reform?

View Comments

I’d like to ask a question to all of you medical-type folks out there, and for this one I’d like other healthcare professionals to weigh in, not just EMS. Of course, Paramedics and EMTs are encouraged to answer this question, but so are Physicians and Nurses (RN and LPNs), as well as CNAs and Techs.

A conversation I had on Twitter regarding administration of 10% Dextrose IV (D-10) as opposed to 50% Dextrose IV (D-50) for hypoglycemic ambulance patients has me wondering something about how we paramedics can create major savings and improve patient care in a short amount of time. We need to look for more “Low Hanging Fruit”.

It is common practice for known diabetic patients presenting with low blood sugar (hypoglycemia) to receive a treatment with IV D-50, IM Glucagon, oral Glucose, or even with the “Kaiser Cocktail” and then sign off with an AMA refusal. The patients are encouraged to eat something containing protein and complex carbohydrates and are usually left in the care of one of their family members and/or friends who can watch them for a while and make sure they’re ok.

I’d say that calls like this make up a fairly large percentage of all calls for an ambulance. While I have no statistics to back me up, I would guess that it could be something like 5% or better. This complaint and resultant treatment pathway is something I do quite frequently in my own practice. Judging from my own experience, I would say it happens quite frequently in most other paramedics’ practices as well.

The question about administering D-10, as brought up by my twitter peep @un_ojo, is if all patients getting treatment with D-10 as opposed to D-50 should be transported to an Emergency Room. My answer was that I believe a 100% transport policy in this case would result in a lot of people being transported to an ER when they probably didn’t really need to be. This would result in a large population of non-emergent ambulance patients going to the ER who in the past would have been “treated and released” (at least under the guise of an AMA refusal) by EMS crews.

And that got me thinking about this question:

If paramedics did not currently have the means to treat hypoglycemia and every one of those patients were being transported to the ER, how much of a burden on the emergency healthcare system would be removed simply by giving paramedics D-50? Probably quite a bit, right?

What other common medical cases would be as appropriate for field “treat and release” (or “Treat and AMA”) care by EMS? If we save a few hundred trips to the ER by being able to sweeten-up and then release common hypoglycemics, what other conditions might we be doing the same for as safely and effectively?

Would this require some easily attainable training? What about new medications and/or equipment?

I look at this as the “Low Hanging Fruit” if you will, of EMS 2.0, and also of healthcare reform. I am a proponent of EMS crews handling more primary care duties, or failing that, of at least having more options in regards to treatment pathways.

That’s what I’m looking for here, folks. What could we do within six months that would make a big impact?

Please discuss in the comments section, and feel free to shoot me an e-mail at ProEMS1@yahoo.com. You can also weigh in on the LUTL Facebook page if you’d like.

Also, would you do me a favor and invite some of the other healthcare people to the party? I’d love to get some of their opinions on this.

Posted by Ckemtp on July 26, 2010 • Filed under: Administration & Leadership, Als, EMS, EMS Topics, EMS system, Emergency Medical Services, Emergency Nurse, Emergency room, Paramedic, Protocol development, ems 2.0, physician, potential, us

Paramedics and EMTs are Special, a salute to the Spork!

View Comments

Ah, the humble Spork. At once it is an example of utility and futility. It is well suited to nothing but bridging the gap between the usefulness of its parent utensils and the burden of having to provide a separate spoon and fork. Sporks are great for when you need to have an eating utensil that is suited to a variety of food consumption scenarios but do not have the space nor the gumption to provide separate utensils. Sporks can perform lots of tasks but they do nothing very well. While I love the concept and the fact that the name is *really* fun to say (Spork? Spork… Spork!!), eating anything with a spork is a challenge. I mean, have you ever tried to eat soup with a spork? You’ll end up wearing a percentage of it. Heaven forbid that you have to use it to hold something you have to cut with a knife like a piece of meat. It’s nearly impossible. I suppose that eating salad with a spork would be fairly manageable but not if you have a lot of non-lettucy stuff in the salad like cherry tomatoes, mushrooms, and/or pepperoni. Honestly, who wants a salad that is comprised only of rabbit food?

Die hard Sporksters, that's who

However, I digress. What I’m trying to say is that the spork, the half-breed malformation of a spoon and a fork, has its place as a substitute for either when it is not economical to provide both. Like its lesser known brother the “knork”, it is a natural idea and a somewhat cool concept. However, there is a very clear reason that the spoon and the fork are separate utensils. There are specific purposes for the design of the spoon and the fork and good reason to have separate tools that are suited to the kind of tasks that they’re used for. The spork is the watered down version of both. It can somewhat perform the tasks of its parents, but not well. It is the “Jack of all trades, Master of none” if you will.

And that is why I’m writing about our humble friend the Spork in my usual rotation of EMS topics. A conversation I had on Twitter the other day with my tweeps @pgsilva and @rescue_monkey brought up the spectre of why exactly ambulances aren’t staffed with nurses and physicians’ assistants and are instead staffed with Paramedics and EMTs. PG and The Rescue Monkey thought that the conversation would make that vein pop out of my forehead like it does sometimes when I get enraged. They were mistaken. It doesn’t make me angry. In fact, I informed everyone that I would write a post on what exactly it makes me think about. This is that post.

The “Why don’t nurses and/or (insert title of healthcare provider here) staff ambulances debate” has a clear answer for me. Here it is:

EMS providers are sporks. We’re also not sporks. We exist in the realm of both the specific and the generalized. We are jacks of all trades and the master of the non-specific. EMS providers are generalized in nature and that generalization is specialized into the random nature of the work in which we perform.

Or women with sporks, you know. That too.

Are you confused? Well that’s understandable. Let’s look at it this way. The ultimate healthcare provider has always been the physician. Since the beginning of western medicine, the physician has always been the healer that people have turned to. Physicians are learned professionals who seek to learn and apply knowledge to the human condition in the name of healing. Physicians are “clinicians” in the fact that they make a clinical diagnosis based upon an examination of a patient and then devise a proper treatment path to treat a patient’s diagnosis. They physician assesses a patient, makes a diagnosis of the patient’s condition based upon their knowledge base and ongoing research, and then uses that same knowledge base and research in order to devise the best treatment possible for the patient. It’s the definition of a clinician.

Nurses, and their modern incarnation as the Registered Professional Nurse (RN) developed as the ultimate assistant to the physician. Their goal was to be the caregiver, the person with enough medical knowledge to continue the care plan and treatment that the physician determined with the compassion and the ability to meet the ongoing needs of the patient. While the physician devoted their efforts to learning and education, the nurse required less education and more compassion. Medical technology and knowledge has expanded greatly and has required the nurse to develop a vast array of knowledge and a myriad of specializations, but their basic function has remained the same. They care for patients in the long term during their convalescence from an illness or injury.

Physicians and nurses have worked in concert. They have developed a system where the sick and injured are brought to them so they may take care of them using the resources they gather together. Each of them performs their role with the goal of making people get better. As knowledge of medicine has increased, different types of physicians and nurses have developed into specialties. The general practitioner acts as a gatekeeper to specialties and treats the most common maladies and is assisted by nurses qualified to care for the largest population of patients. Specialists, such as Cardiologists, Oncologists, and Surgeons, have developed to allow patients the benefit of having people treat them who have sought out to become experts in exactly the illness that the patient may have. The nurses have adapted and have become specialized in their own right, with nursing specialties that complement the specialties of the physician.

However, there is a drawback to all of this specialization. When you have a malady that affects your feet, you would benefit being under the care of the podiatrist. However, you wouldn’t get the best care possible if the only physician available were a cardiologist. The same holds true for the oncologist that attempts to treat your pulmonary condition or for the proctologist who treats your sore throat. While the basic concepts are there, the specialization of focus is not. To be sure, while a person who has graduated from medical school may be able to treat pretty much any condition that you may have at a level that is basically adequate, specialists have devoted their time in the quest of knowledge in their specific area at the possible expense of their knowledge of other areas. This is a good thing, and it’s the reason that pretty much every hospital is full of people with vast arrays of knowledge in singular topics. This system wasn’t designed. Like capitalism the system designed itself. It works and works well, most of the time. However when economics dictate a limited number of available specialties, certain conditions may be left out.

Nurses have done much the same. While the basic concepts are the same pretty much across the board, a School Nurse would have trouble transitioning into the operating theatre as much as the Oncology nurse would have trouble transitioning into public health. Both of them can probably change a bedpan, start an IV, pass medication, or lend a caring smile in the same manner but the oncology nurse would be much more well versed in the management of chemotherapy drugs and chronic pain management than a would be a surgical nurse.

This brings us to Paramedics and EMTs. We are a profession born out of necessity and forged in battle. Really. We can thank Napoleon for bringing forth the first example of the “flying ambulance” which was a brigade of horse-drawn ambulances staffed by medically trained soldiers. They appeared on the battlefield during the Napoleonic wars and boasted that “No soldier lay with undressed wounds for more than a quarter of an hour”. Battlefield “Medics” have always been on the forefront of emergency acute care in the field. While some examples of ambulance care available to the civilian population exist, in the US it wasn’t until after the Vietnam War that civilian emergency ambulance service became popular and seen as a need rather than a nice thing to have. While physicians often made house calls where they travelled to the patient to provide care, in the interest of efficiency they began to confine themselves in clinics and hospitals where they could more efficiently care for larger patient volumes. With the publishing of the “EMS White Paper” entitled “Accidental Death and Disability: The Neglected Disease of Modern Society” in 1966, the attention of the public was focused on the need for an effort to extend care out of the walls of the hospital or clinic. The white paper laid out statistics of trauma, stated the need for injury prevention and education, and stated the need for standardization of emergency medical training. The US. Dept. of Transportation took up the mantle of the new Emergency Medical Services system due to the alarming number of fatalities on the burgeoning highway system and modern EMS was born.

"Stick a Spork in me, I'm done" should be part of your daily speech patterns

The EMT and the Paramedic are the equivalent of sticking a spork in the problem and calling it done. EMTs were cheap to train, cheap to employ, and could be widely distributed out there in the field. At the time, it was the perfect solution. Train people in how to perform in the first few moments of a severe injury or acute illness and give them the ability to safely transport a patient to a hospital where the physicians could work in concert to help heal the patient. The nurses, in their role as the assistants to the physicians, stayed in the walls of the hospital or clinic and developed within their specialties. The system grew and developed as the innovators in the field saw more and more acute treatments that could be performed by these new breed of healthcare providers and as the EMTs and Paramedics proved themselves in service.

EMTs and Paramedics are clinicians in the sense that we evaluate a patient and develop a treatment plan that we follow to help them. Our specialty is in the acute, the treatment of disease in the here and now. If it’s happening to a patient and it is directly threatening their life, chances are that an EMT or Paramedic can intervene in a meaningful way. Our specialty is to stabilize and stop the progression of the acute disease process or chain-of-events in an injury that will eventually lead to death. We plug holes and we do it with a knowledge base taught to us by physicians. Our generalization is across the entire spectrum of possible patients, from field delivery of neonates, to jumping in to help stabilize patients in outpatient surgery centers, to taking care of the elderly in nursing homes. Whether a patient is crushed in an industrial machine, is trapped in a rural car accident, is having a heart attack on a baseball diamond, or whatever happens to a person wherever it happens to them, the Paramedic or EMT is the person most specialized in coming to their aid. We gain knowledge and hone experience not just in the treatment of our patients’ medical conditions, but also in the environmental circumstances in which we find them. We may be generalized sporks when it comes to treating any possible injury or acute illness across any patient population, but we’re highly specialized utensils when it comes to treating emergency conditions anywhere at any time.

"Sporks and Phasers" would be a good name for a Rock Band

No other healthcare provider fits into our role… and that seems to make us a full-fledged utensil in my opinion. We are unclassifiable into any other role yet indispensable for our own.

And we need to get out there and let everybody know just how special that role is. Nobody has developed the breadth of knowledge in our specialty that we have. We have made the spork our own.

And that, folks is my answer to why no other healthcare professional can quite full our role. While as a paramedic I am competent in the basic skills needed to say, work in a endoscopy unit, I would not function there to the level of a person experienced and knowledgeable as an endoscopy nurse. Neither would they be able to manage a traumatic airway upside down in a crushed automobile at night as well as I would. It’s my specialty to do the latter, not the former, even though the basic skills may be the same.

For more on this, g’head and read “Any Random Person” an older post of mine. Then get out there and shine up your sporks.

Posted by Ckemtp on July 6, 2010 • Filed under: ALS Intercept, EMS, EMS Topics, EMT, Emergency Medical Services, Paramedic, Training & Development, ems 2.0, ems education, humor, paramedic education, politics, potential, profession, training-fire-rescue-topics

Should EMS Improvise? And the Recipe for the “Kaiser Cocktail”

View Comments

Here’s the recipe for what I call the “Kaiser Cocktail”:

Look in the patient’s kitchen cupboards until you find a box (or a bag) of some type of granulated sugar, powdered sugar, or brown sugar. (in a pinch, you can use honey or syrup)
Find one of the patient’s own cups or glasses, wash it if you have to.
Dump a bunch of the sugar in the glass.
Look in the patient’s refrigerator until you find some soda pop or some type of sweet juice like orange, apple, or grape juice.
Pour that in the glass with the sugar.
Mix it up really well with some type of stirring device. Don’t use your pen or your finger. (Your partner’s pen or finger is ok though.) (Not really.)
Serve warm, chilled, or tepid. Garnish with a peanut butter and jelly sandwich.

Have you guessed what the “Kaiser Cocktail is used for? If you’re in EMS I’m pretty sure you may have figured it out. It’s for sweetening up your local mild hypoglycemic… and no, it’s definitely not for serving to my son right before I drop him off with the in-laws for revenge purposes. The Kaiser Cocktail is for those patients who have blood glucose levels in the mid double digits but that still have the mental faculties necessary for drinking fluids and for protecting their airway while they do it. It’s a home remedy of sorts and it isn’t exactly the kind of thing that they teach you in EMT school. It works like a charm every time and I’ve never seen it not be well tolerated by the patients I’ve used it on or by the families that watch me do it. In fact, the families always seem more than willing to help whip one right up when I ask them to do so.

Picture this scenario: Your ambulance is dispatched to the “Known Diabetic with Altered Mental Status” at an address a short 8 minutes away. You respond to a well kept address in a nice neighborhood and are directed into the residence by a twenty-something female who tells you that her grandfather “Just isn’t acting right and won’t get out of bed”. Seeing no obvious hazards, you enter the residence with the granddaughter and follow her to the back bedroom of the residence to find a 60-something male patient sitting on the bed. He acknowledges you when you introduce yourself and you can see that he’s trying to talk but that he cannot seem to form the words. You say to him “Howdy! How are you feeling??” He answers: “Um… hello…” with a normal voice quality. His airway is patent, his skin is pink, warm, and sweaty, and he doesn’t appear to have any hemispheric neurological deficit. His pulse is bounding and regular at the radial and his respirations are normal. The granddaughter tells you that the patient is diabetic and that he takes insulin.

Got the case diagnosed yet? I’d bet you do. The next thing I would do with this patient is to take a quick finger stick glucose check. For the above fictional scenario, the reading would be 40mg/dl (which is um… “something’ MMOL for you British folk). It’s mild hypoglycemia. I ruled out a possible stroke (CVA/TIA) with the Cincinnati Pre-Hospital Stroke Scale and he patient’s cardiac function seems very normal with his bounding, regular pulse rate. The diaphoresis (sweating) and skin color are differential signs of hypoglycemia, and the patient’s past medical history helps clinch the field diagnosis. This patient’s blood glucose level dropped too low for his brain to function normally and he needs more sugar coursing through his veins in order to feed his brain.

You may be wondering why I brought forth such a common, run-of-the-mill patient presentation on the blog today. As pre-hospital providers, we have a few options available for us that could be considered proper care for this patient. Most EMTs have oral glucose paste at their disposal and a growing number of EMT-Basics carry Glucagon for IM injection. EMT-Intermediates and Paramedics usually have both of the previous medications available and almost all of them carry D-50, or 50% Dextrose solution in water, for IV administration. All of these treatments could be considered for this patient; however I would pull out my namesake concoction in this case. Call it experience, but starting an IV and giving D-50 seems like it would be risky overkill for this patient and an IM injection of glucagon saps the patient’s natural reserves of glycogen for quite a while after administration. Patients seem to hate the taste of oral glucose paste (Lemon?? Really??) and one tube never sees to do the trick. We only care two of them anyway.

That’s why I use a Kaiser Cocktail with these patients. As long as the patient can maintain their own airway and there’s not an aspiration risk, I can’t think of any contraindications once you rule out a possible stroke. It’s cheap, easy, and it has worked like a charm for me every time I’ve tried it. I like using it too, as it feels like a “Mr. Wizard” type home remedy that always fascinates the patient’s family members who watch me make it up.

Here’s the rub though, nowhere in my protocols does it give me authority to give a patient any nourishment or fluids by mouth. In fact, I can’t give a patient anything to eat or drink that isn’t specifically allowed by my standing orders. In EMS, even something as innocuous as sugared-up orange juice can be a legal difficulty. Common sense isn’t allowed by lawyers, unless of course they’re saying you should have used some. The reality is that every time I whip up a Kaiser Cocktail, I’m putting my license at risk.

I used a Kaiser Cocktail as recently as of the day I’m writing this post and I’m asking for a debate here. I’d like it if you would please answer some questions for me below the post in the comments section:

Do you think that the Kaiser Cocktail is an appropriate treatment for mild-to-moderate hypoglycemia in a known-diabetic patient with a patent airway?
Do you see any contraindications or risks that I have missed?
Would a tube of oral glucose paste (or tablets, if you use them) be more appropriate than the Kaiser Cocktail?
Should EMS providers be allowed to improvise treatments such as the Kaiser Cocktail for these and other like situations? Why or Why not?

I can’t wait to see your answers.

Posted by Ckemtp on June 21, 2010 • Filed under: Administration & Leadership, Ambulance, EMS, EMS Topics, EMS ethics, EMS protocols, EMS training, Emergency Medical Services, Paramedic, Patient Management, Protocol development, SMG, SMO, ems 2.0, ems scenario, ems scenario based education, medical ethics, paramedic education, scenario, scenario based training

Master Paramedics? I’m asking you a question

View Comments

Let me ask YOU a question. What do you think about this:

How do we recognize the best and brightest among us? How would we distinguish the EMTs and Paramedics who have earned the respect and admiration of their peers for being “Really Good” at what they do? I don’t mean just a little bit good, or “pretty” good. I mean masterfully good. The kind of Paramedics that Johnny and/or Roy would have wanted to be had they grown up watching them on Saturday mornings. The kind of people that have worked in the profession for as long as they can remember but that never lost the passion for the job. The kind of people who read everything they can, study everything they can get their hands on, and always seem to have the answers to the most challenging of EMS trivia, as well as the most mundane.

What would we call them?

The old trade guilds used to call their most experienced and skilled members “Master”, as in the term “Master Craftsman”. As their members worked through the years and learned the ropes of the trade, they progressed through the various levels until they reached “Master” status. Some unions still use those terms and honestly, I’m unfamiliar with what all of them are. That’s ok with me because I see Paramedicine as a profession and not as a trade, but I do respect their tradition of honoring those that have earned the title of “Master” by thoroughly mastering their craft.

So what do we EMS people do? How would we recognize a “Master Paramedic” or “Master EMT”?

I’ve been thinking about this for quite a while, honestly. As I progress in the profession and in my career path, I’ve seen the people who were my mentors keep working alongside of me. They’re my colleagues now, and although they still mentor me in some ways, they have been progressing along their own paths just as I have this whole time. Some of them have become true masters of the profession. Some of them have not. Some of them could really be called “Master Paramedics” and I would like to know how we as a profession should recognize those people. I see that these people don’t tend to be treated very well by the profession in general and I think that it’s a crying shame. Think about it, new paramedics walk in the doors to the profession and are allowed to work in the same capacity as our master medics within a relatively short time. Employers tend to not want to keep these people around when budgets get tight because these people tend to be on the upper end of the pay scale. In some agencies there’s a defined career path and upward ladder, but in a lot of (and dare I say most) agencies there is not.

So what if there were a certification, or some way to define a “Master Paramedic” and/or “Master EMT”? What would be the qualifications? What would be the benefits? How would we define those people who have earned (Yes, really EARNED) “Master” status?

This is one of the things I’m asking you to think about. If you would please, put some thought into this and write what you think would make a “Master” paramedic or “Master” EMT in the comments section. No, I don’t think that this is silly. I really want to know what you all think about this.

Here’s what I think:

- Minimum Years in the Profession: The Master EMT or Paramedic should have more than 10 years of FULL TIME service (15 years if volunteer, depending on call volume)

- Minimum Experience and Type of Calls: The master EMT or Paramedic should be experienced in a broad spectrum of the different types of EMS. 911 response within diverse response strategies, Medical Transports, and In-Hospital medical care.

- Teaching and Precepting Experience: The Master EMT or Paramedic should have experience teaching EMS classes and in mentoring new providers.

- Command Experience: The Master Paramedic of EMT should have experience in being in command of different types of emergency scenes and large scale responses.

- Knowledge: The Master Paramedic or EMT should have to pass a complex series of tests that show not only rote memorization, but also complete conceptualization and deep background knowledge of a broad spectrum of EMS and Medical related knowledge.

- Acknowledgement by Peers: The Master Paramedic or EMT should have the support and admiration of his colleagues, coworkers, and peers and should be able to get them to vouch for him or her when asked.

Now, I also ask you. If you were to recognize a person that could pass the standards that I’ve set, or that you and others set in the comments below, how should we show our respect to these people for their professional achievements? How should our profession honor and acknowledge our highest achievers?

I’m very curious about this issue. Please feel free to add your thoughts.

Posted by Ckemtp on June 8, 2010 • Filed under: Administration & Leadership, Command & Leadership, EMS, EMS Management, EMS Motivation, EMS Topics, EMS ethics, EMS pep talk, Emergency Medical Services, Paramedic, Training & Development, appreciation, ems 2.0, ems education, paramedic salary, pride, profession, professionalism, training-fire-rescue-topics

EMS 2.0 as Explained to My Brother

View Comments

My brother is an engineer. Yes, he’s a firefighter and occasionally he still drives the Fire Truck, but I’m not talking about being an engineer as it relates to the fire service. I’m talking about a pocket-protector wearing, slide-rule-sliding Engineer who draws lines on paper and calculates weight to strength ratios and the like. It’s math that’s way over my head and I’m glad that he’s the one that has to do that type of work every day and not me. When he explains his job to me my brain starts to overheat and I’m surprised that my hair hasn’t caught on fire yet. It started smoking once, but I was able to catch a glimpse of “The Hills” on the TV and it slowed my mental activity just in time.

My brother, Captain Kaiser, is a volunteer fire captain and he used to be an EMT although he let it lapse due to the fact that it limited time with his family. I guess that I got the EMS genes and he got the “go to college and get a real job that pays well” genes. I say more power to him and he’s one of my best friends. I don’t get to see him as much as I should, but we talk often on the phone. He has always been interested in hearing all of my tales of EMS glory, and I listen to tales of his two daughters. Raising daughters sounds waaaay different than raising my son.

The other day I was talking to him about “this blogging stuff I do” and I breached the subject of EMS 2.0. I haven’t written much about EMS 2.0 by name lately, although the concepts I’ve been bringing forth fit into my model of it, but trust me when I say there has been a lot of behind the scenes activity. It turned into an interesting conversation with my brother. He was an EMT but never got past the volunteering when his community needs him stage. That’s an honorable place to be, no doubt, but he didn’t delve into the level that I take it to. So explaining EMS 2.0 to him was close to explaining it to an educated lay person.

In the conversation, I brought up the scenario that I used to write the post: “Are We the Gatekeepers to the Emergency Healthcare System?” (Unofficially titled, “Did I do good?”) and explained to him how I evaluated a patient in a nursing home, performed a full assessment on her including a 12-lead EKG and a review of her recent lab work, held a telephone conference with her Primary Care Physician and the Nursing staff on scene, and triaged the patient to the Primary Heathcare System as opposed to the Emergency Healthcare System. In the process, I saved the healthcare system (in the form of Medicare) thousands of dollars and provided better care to the patient by deferring her from the emergency room. I explained to him that my ambulance service could not bill the patient for the care I provided her because we did not transport and that the current system needs to recognize the value in having EMS provide such services in terms of cost-savings. If I would have transported, our service would have made the revenue, but Medicare would have paid thousands of dollars in unnecessary care overall. Since I didn’t, I saved Medicare thousands, but the service wasn’t valued and we didn’t receive any compensation for our work.

Basically, the conversation wound up being that he agreed with me that EMS has a powerful position to improve access to primary care and “save” healthcare as it were by increasing access to primary care, properly deferring patients from the emergency healthcare system when their care could be more appropriately managed in the primary care setting, and by saving millions of dollars in the overall healthcare setting. He agreed with me that it would require deregulation of the EMS industry to allow us to attempt programs and offer new services outside of our current mold and would require increased education of street-level EMS providers to get this done. He also agreed with me that money we’re already collectively spending should be allocated from inefficient programs and given to efficient high-performance EMS systems to do this in order to realize greater savings.

Remember, he’s an engineer. He’s good at math. He may not be a healthcare provider currently schlepping patients around in a shiny red and white bus that makes “woo woo” sounds, but he’s as smart as they come…

And when I told him that he’s exactly who we should be getting our message out to, he disagreed. He thinks that we should be out there talking to politicians and Insurance Industry executives. Honestly, he chastised me for not being in my local congresshuman’s office to do just that.

So, here’s a shoutout to the politicos out there: “EMS can ‘save’ healthcare through a free-market, grass-roots, innovative solution using currently available resources. We can save millions and improve the entire healthcare system just by putting in place a few good ideas and allowing EMS professionals the ability to think outside of the box”.

So do me a favor, y’all. Go tell your local politico to e-mail me at Proems1@yahoo.com. I’d love to have a talk with them. You should too.

Posted by Ckemtp on May 26, 2010 • Filed under: Administration & Leadership, Command & Leadership, EMS, EMS Management, EMS Topics, EMS system, Economics, Emergency Medical Services, Fire Rescue Topics, Management, PR, Paramedic, US economy, ems 2.0, paramedic education, profession

EMS Week – Introducing EMS to the Public. Spread the word

View Comments

This is another in my series of posts that you may send as a letter to the editor of your local newspaper and/or put in for publication on your site to use my words to help spread the message of EMS week. You may use this freely, but please keep it intact.

————————————————

Barely given a passing thought until the unthinkable happens, the emergency medical services (EMS) are always there, toiling in relative obscurity until the flashing lights and wailing sirens of an ambulance remind you that there are indeed paramedics out there waiting for your call. People don’t tend to think of the ambulance service that cares for them and their loved ones as an essential service. They also rarely think much about them when they aren’t in need of their care. Usually then it’s only to wonder “What is taking them so long!?” instead of wondering if they’re currently bogged down with a lack of resources due to funding constraints and/or abuse of the emergency healthcare system.

Ambulances are a part of every community in one form or another and the US certainly has one of the best EMS systems the world has ever seen. Highly trained paramedics and Emergency Medical Technicians (EMTs) have progressed far past what the public perception of them tends to be and instead of being there only to provide a quick lights-and-sirens rush to the hospital, today’s ambulance is a ‘Mobile Intensive Care Unit’ that can roughly provide care equivalent to the first hour or so of care in the Emergency Room. The focus has long shifted from bringing the patient to care and now focuses on bringing care to the patient. While there are a few conditions that warrant immediate evaluation and treatment by a physician there are many more that benefit from immediate stabilization in the field provided by a paramedic or EMT. In fact, the care provided in the first few minutes of symptom onset by a paramedic can make the difference between a ‘bump-in-the-road’ for your health and long-term morbidity and lasting ill effects.

Think of a paramedic as Emergency Healthcare Specialists focused on the Acute, or care of the “Here and Now”. If it’s happening to you and it’s going to harm or even kill you, chances are that a paramedic can step in and make a big difference in the progression of the disease process. They may not be able to cure you, but they can make a good deal of difference in terms of stabilization and in limiting the long-term harm that you suffer.

Even in the United States, and perhaps especially here in the US, there is variability in the level of care and service provided by ambulance services. Each state has their own individual licensing requirements and the level of authority on those licenses varies greatly due to local control within those states. All paramedics and EMTs function under the ultimate authority of a Licensed Physician to provide “Medical Control” and a system of standing medical orders or “protocols” that the paramedics and EMTs use their medical judgment to pick and choose from based upon their working field diagnosis of a patient’s condition. In my home state of Illinois, the medical direction has provided what some EMS personnel would consider to be conservative protocols while just across the state line in Wisconsin the protocols allow much more breadth in the abilities of the paramedic and EMT to care for the patient. These differences can be caused by myriad factors ranging from the personal prerogative of the medical control physician, to local political pressures, and even to distance to a hospital emergency room. The way that a service is configured also plays a roll, with some private ambulance services having experience in “Critical Care” paramedicine, and some Fire Department based providers focusing on short transport times. Within the industry, there is much debate on the topic of what organizational configuration, Fire-Based, Hospital-Based, Private-for-profit, Private-Not-For-Profit, Governmental Third Service, or otherwise provides for the best operational effectiveness and therefore the best patient care. While the opinions have run very high, it is clear that no one solution will work for every community. The public does need to be aware that EMS is not simply a function of “The Fire Department” or “the hospital” or of anything other than EMS itself existing to provide optimal patient care. The terms “Firefighter” and “Paramedic” are no more synonymous than are “Garbageman” and “Librarian”. The importance is that Paramedics and EMTs focus on healthcare and providing the best quality EMS. However some communities have chosen to combine the functions for a perceived cost savings. You should explore the issue in your own community to see what best works.

And that’s the important part.

EMS is in desperate need of public involvement. We are in desperate need of the public giving us more than a passing thought and actively taking an interest in how EMS is able to care for them and in their own healthcare. For too long, EMS and the Profession of Paramedicine have gone unnoticed. We’ve been suffering from public apathy as acutely as our patients suffer from heart attacks and strokes. Now perhaps more than ever, we need you to help us. We have to raise public awareness and work with our communities to provide the best possible service and the best possible patient outcomes.

Within the industry, there have emerged a few powerful ideas that could have far reaching impact not only upon EMS, but upon the entire healthcare system. Loosely entitled “EMS 2.0”, the ideas have come forth from street-level paramedics and EMTs and represent a “reboot” of the entire spectrum of how we do our work. Imagine if a few regulatory and educational changes could save billions in overall healthcare costs. Imagine if paramedics could improve access to primary healthcare for millions of underserved citizens catching and screening out serious disease before they even result in an acute emergency. It would be game changing, and it has a very real possibility of happening if the public would pay attention to us. It’s your future we’re trying to improve. It’s your health that motivates us to get out of bed at all hours to care for you. By your taking an interest in what we have to say, you could improve the health of your community many times over.

Here’s what you can do. First off, speak with your local EMS provider to see what their immediate needs are. In many communities, EMS is understaffed and underfunded. When was the last time you saw your community’s public works or police departments holding a bake sale to raise operational funds or to buy a new bulldozer or ammunition? Fire departments and EMS agencies do it all the time. Learn about how EMS is provided in surrounding communities and in communities of like size in your state and region. Talk with your healthcare providers and community leaders to ensure that their commitments to EMS reflect the lifesaving importance of EMS care. Local politics kill quality in EMS, communities need to tell their politicians to stop petty squabbles and focus on what is truly important. Learn the issues and listen to the people out on the street providing care.

Another good resource for the public to learn about EMS is to look at industry-specific information provided in the trade journals, online sites, and the EMS blogosphere. Whatever the local flavor of EMS that has developed in your community may be, there may be a better option out there. In fact, there probably is a better way and community members need to demand these better ways from their local EMS service or find, expose, and change local political factors that keep new and more efficient operations away from their local service. Medicine changes, so do best practices, and the public needs to demand the best from their EMS providers. Learn what the best truly is. In discussions with local politicos, scare tactics tend to run the argument. Educate yourself on the issues so that you can make the best possible decisions for your EMS providers and for your community.

For more information:

Http://www.JEMS.com – The Journal of Emergency Medical Services

Http://www.EMSresponder.com – EMS Magazine

Http://www.LifeUnderTheLights.com – The Author of this articles industry-specific EMS blog

Http://www.ChroniclesOfEMS.com – A new television show and videocast being produced by street Paramedics trying to explore EMS in an entertaining and informative way. This could be considered the “Face of EMS 2.0”

———————————————————————–

The author, Chris Kaiser, is a nationally registered Emergency Medical Technician-Paramedic licensed in multiple states. He has been providing EMS for over a decade and is a writer and speaker on EMS issues. More from Chris can be found at Http://www.LifeUnderTheLights.com

Posted by Ckemtp on May 15, 2010 • Filed under: Ambulance, EMS, EMS Health & Safety, EMS Management, EMS Topics, EMS week, Emergency Medical Services, Paramedic, ckemtp, ems 2.0, ems week 2010

Sunday May 16th! You’re coming, Right?

View Comments

So I’m going to be in Chicago on May 16th at Fado Irish Pub (100 W. Grand Ave, Chicago, IL) at 7pm for this. You REALLY HAVE TO BE THERE. If you’re in the Midwest, come on down and have a pint or two with EMS friends to celebrate EMS Week 2010. There’s gonna be a couple of movies screened, fellowship, food, and beverages.

The information is all contained on this Flyer:

Chronicles of EMS/FireStorm Flyer

Oh, do you see the times for Philadelphia and San Francisco? If you live around there, you should go there and hang out. Chicago’s gonna be cooler, but you know

Please, if you’re coming shoot me an e-mail at Proems1@yahoo.com or @ckemtp me on twitter. I’d love to see ya there

Posted by Ckemtp on May 10, 2010 • Filed under: EMS, EMS Topics, EMS week, Uncategorized, ems 2.0, ems week 2010

A Slap in the Face for Medics? How about a Wake-up call

View Comments

Thank you everyone! Yesterday when I posted “A Slap in the Face to Paramedics Everywhere?” I recorded my biggest traffic day ever by at least one thousand visitors. I’m honored. Thank you for coming and reading this and thank you for caring about EMS. Especially, thank you those who left such intelligent comments and added to the debate. We who care about our profession need people who are passionate, intelligent, and who are ready to work alongside of us to improve who we are and what we do. By participating here and in the wider EMS blogosphere, you’re helping spread the ideas that we need to spread. Read, Talk, Learn, and Think. Make this the profession you want it to be.

I’m going to repeat that above statement: “Make this the profession you want it to be”

And there lies the true meaning of what I wrote yesterday. Sure, I was mad about the perceived encroachment by nurses onto our professional “turf”, and sure I played my anger up into what I thought would be something to fire you up as well, but there was a message there that not everyone may have gotten.

I know that there are good nurses out there that know a lot about a lot of stuff. A lot of them do a great job in the field within their scope and their experience in such things as neonatology, pediatrics, and critical care has proven invaluable to me on a lot of occasions. Yes, like each and every medic out there I can speak volumes about the times I’ve seen and worked with nurses who seem to be lacking vital chromosomes, but I’ve seen members of every profession that seem to have written their final exams in crayon. It’s no different when I am staffed alongside an idiot partner of the EMT persuasion… give me a smart nurse in their place any day.

However, my beef is this: Why is it necessary that a nurse need ever step into the field? The times I’ve had to carry one in the back of my rig have been mainly because of protocol deficiencies, where the EMS system I was working in at the time didn’t allow me to transport a specialized piece of equipment that was attached to a patient or to administer medications that were beyond the normal scope of the field. Now days, my EMS system allows me to transport pretty much anything and I’ve personally taken the steps to educate myself on the less-common things that I see. However, I’ve grabbed a nurse on occasion when called to transport multiple uncommon medications along with unfamiliar equipment. I’ve never been too proud to ask for help when I wasn’t fully confident in my abilities to fully handle possible eventualities with the patient. It’s not about my ego, it’s about patient care. I live by that motto. However there is no reason, in my opinion, that a paramedic cannot take the education necessary to become experts in any and every aspect of out-of-hospital care. It’s our bread and butter and the thought that our skills are lacking causes me concern. Whatever you call it: inter-hospital, pre-hospital, field, or other care… Paramedics are supposed to be the experts at that in my opinion and I want us to take the steps to ensure that we are so.

If you were angered by the actions of this ambulance service plastering their truck with the phrase “Staffed by Nurses”, that’s good. You should have been. Be angry at the management of that service for existing in a system that they haven’t changed for the better so that they don’t have to use nurses for things that paramedics should be doing. Be angry at their EMS system and their state for limiting their paramedics’ scope of practice and education so that they cannot be used to adequately staff the truck. Then, be angry at each and every one of us for not taking the ownership of our profession so that we can step up and dictate what is best for the patient’s we serve.

Is that petty “turf preservation”? Maybe. However we need some of that. For us to have pride in our profession we need to take the steps necessary to own what we are supposed to own. If we can see our profession lacking the necessary educational background, skills, or just plain old gumption to fix a problem, then we have to band together to do the work needed to fix it. The fact that this service and this system are thinking that having and advertising a “special” truck, “Staffed by Nurses” is a good idea is representative of a bigger problem, and that bigger problem must be handled by our people stepping up and handling our deficiencies so that we can solve the problem. We must improve the education, improve our skills, and improve our public perception so that people trust us beyond just the feel-good perception we have as “life saving” “ambulance drivers”.

You’ve heard me, Justin “the Happy Medic” Schorr, Mark “Medic999” Glencorse, and many, many others talking about EMS 2.0 over the last year. Well, this is part of it. My version of EMS 2.0 involves us paramedics taking ownership of problems like these and taking the necessary collaborative steps to fix them. We have to do just that if we want to advance. Now is the time for us to analyze the problems, dissolve the political boundaries, do the necessary work, and collectively grow up as a profession.

And fixing management philosophies that view us as contemptible morons is first.

One last comment, I got a link in a fascinating article by the Nursing Show ran by my buddy Jamie Davis. You should read it, it’s a good way to see how the nurses take this.

————————————————-

Also, for more of my thoughts on the state of EMS in the State of Illinois, check out “Dear Illinois EMS”

Posted by Ckemtp on April 26, 2010 • Filed under: Administration & Leadership, Command & Leadership, EMS, EMS Management, EMS Topics, EMS pep talk, EMS rant, EMS system, Emergency Medical Services, Emergency Nurse, Paramedic, Training & Development, ckemtp, ckemtp rants, ems 2.0, ems education, paramedic education, politics, potential, pride, profession, professionalism

A Slap in the Face to Paramedics Everywhere?

View Comments

As some of you probably know, last weekend I went to the Fire Department Instructors’ Conference (FDIC) in Indianapolis, IN and I spent a great deal of time wandering the convention floor, looking at cool things and talking to cool people. There were plenty of great things to see and great new things to learn about and I immersed myself in doing just that. One of the things I’m always interested in is looking at the new trends in ambulance design and the manufacturers always have their coolest new vehicles on display to feed my interest. However, while walking the conference floor, I came across an ambulance that did more to tick me off than it did to promote their new vehicle design. Seriously, it was like someone slapped me in the face. Here’s the picture I took from my phone:

Does anybody see anything wrong with that picture? I was immediately ticked off… I’m talking a level 7 hissy fit. I was livid for quite a while and if you follow my twitter feed, you probably saw the three or four times I TwitPic’d it.

I mean really? They had to put “Staffed By Nurses” in six inch high script on three sides of this thing?

I blocked out the name of the service that runs the ambulance and in all fairness to the manufacturer, this truck is awesome. I would be quite happy to work in this truck although being that it has no bench seat, its usefulness as a 911 truck is hampered by its inability to carry more than one patient at a time. However, I would flatly refuse to work in this truck or for the ambulance service that puts it on the street. I happen to know the service that bought it and I’m trying to avoid naming them directly, but they serve a midsize city in Illinois.

Before you go all West Side Story, whip out your switch blade and zip gun, and prepare to have a dance fight with the nurses out there, realize that I’m not mad at them. Sure, mostly they’re well-paid and have climate controlled jobs inside of well-lit buildings, but they didn’t do this to us. My beef is with the management of this particular ambulance service.

So, let’s say that you’re the manager of this particular ambulance service. Obviously, sitting there in your office you must think that your paramedics and EMTs are contemptible morons who live simply to cause you problems. Furthering your view of the world, you probably think that the rest of the medical profession and the members of the general public in your area view them the same way and simply don’t trust them to provide medical care when it’s like *really* complicated and stuff. You probably feel that everyone would feel safer knowing that their patient or loved one is traveling via the companionship of “nurses” whom you must view as actually being like actually *Competent* and stuff.

And that’s what this rolling billboard to your contempt of your employees and their profession says about you. It’s a slap in the face to the good men and women you have working for you and there is flatly no excuse for it.

Here’s a tip, anonymous ambulance manager person (AAMP). There isn’t a need to have your precious ambulance be “staffed by nurses” when you have sufficiently equipped and prepared paramedics working in it. Paramedics are acute care specialists. We’re also experts in mobile medicine. Our education, training, and experience prepare us for the unique environment that we create when we move patients from one place to another. Critical Care Paramedics have the intensive Care experience, training, and background needed to operate in a critical care ambulance environment, nurses do not. Sure, ICU and ER nurses are great at Critical Care. However you shouldn’t regularly staff a critical care nurse in the transport environment for the same reasons that you wouldn’t put a critical care paramedic inside of the ICU. The professions are like in a lot of ways, but they’re separate for a good reason.

And you, AAMP, don’t respect that. Perhaps it’s because you’re burnt out. Perhaps it’s because you’ve beaten the system you’ve created into such a pulp that nobody wanted to staff your new Critical Care Truck. Perhaps it’s because of a lot of reasons, but it’s certainly not because you wanted the best in patient care or to show that your employees are capable of operating your shiny new “special” ambulance. No, you wanted “nurses” to “staff” that truck… and not only did you want the medical people you’re contracting with to know this, you wanted everyone who saw the truck to know it as the 6 inch high letters stating that fact clearly show. Do you think that the public views your crews as incompetent? If so, do you think that furthering the notion by advertising that your “special” truck is “staffed by nurses” will help that situation?

If your protocols are so draconian that even critical care certified paramedics cannot be allowed to staff that truck, then your protocol system is in the Stone Age. If your educational system isn’t up to the challenge of preparing your most experienced medics to staff it, then fix that problem. I know that there are great medic/nurse combos out there and I know that flight nurses have garnered quite a bit of respect out there in the world… and heck, I’m not knocking them for doing it. However, this is the time for Paramedics to step up and claim our turf. This ambulance clinched it for me. AAMP, your shortsightedness has caused me to lead a revolution of sorts here. You’re contempt for your staff has indicated to me that now is the time for paramedics and EMTs, such as the ones that work for you, to stand up and start claiming what is rightfully ours. Frankly, AAMP, your ambulance and your attitude is ridiculous and thinking like that must be stamped out right now by the good medics among us.

And I should also say this to the nurses in the audience before you start skewering me for knocking you: Have you looked at the debates in your circles concerning the use of paramedics in the ER and in other hospital units? Have you ever seen the term “Unlicensed Assistive Personnel”? Well I have, and it’s what the upper nursing echelon calls me and my professional colleagues. It’s offensive, but hey… our jobs are different. You have the hospitals and the fixed facilities. That’s what you do. We have the field. It’s what we do. There’s a line, respect it. If you want to do EMS, go through a real paramedic program. If we want to do nursing, we should go to nursing school. Really, it’s that simple. The transport environment is difficult and requires the use of specialized personnel… which we have, they’re called paramedics. The medical care we provide is close to the care that you provide, except we have autonomy that you do not and we are use to working independently in the environment in which we operate. Your focus is different than mine. You may be the best transport nurse out there, but even though you personally may be awesome, my profession needs to have people as awesome as you working on our side. That’s what this is about, not to knock your transport nursing skills, but to kick us paramedics in the shorts and get us to step up and maintain ownership of what we should own.

The responses I got back on Twitter show me that there are a lot of like minded individuals out there. Perhaps some of them might work for you, AAMP. You better take that into consideration because if I have my way the paramedics are going to get the notion that we’re not just a bunch of contemptible morons and we’re soon going to take control of our own profession. On that day, managers like you will be obsolete. Perhaps you can get a job managing nurses.

Here is my personal ‘thumbs down’ for the graffiti against my profession that you had someone slather on your shiny new truck, AAMP. My advice? Take it off and reconsider your staffing patterns. What you’re doing is bad for my profession. It affects me negatively, it affects my profession negatively, and it shall not go unanswered.

What do you think?

—————————————————————

Be sure to check out the follow-up to this post “A Slap in the Face? How about a Wake-Up Call?”

Also, for more of my thoughts on the state of EMS in the State of Illinois, check out “Dear Illinois EMS”

Posted by Ckemtp on April 26, 2010 • Filed under: 911 fail, Administration & Leadership, Ambulance, Ambulance Driver, Command & Leadership, EMS, EMS Management, EMS Motivation, EMS Topics, EMS rant, EMS training, Emergency Medical Services, Emergency Nurse, Paramedic, Scope of Practice, Vehicle Operation & Ambulances, ckemtp rants, ems 2.0, paramedic education, politics, potential, pride, profession, professionalism

Any Random Person

View Comments

I love Dave Barry, he has been called the most influential humor writer since Mark Twain. If you haven’t read any of his stuff, you really should. In fact, I’ll even provide a link to his web site here: www.davebarry.com. Yes, I’m providing that before what I’m sure will be my well-written, extremely interesting content below. He’s that good.

I put that up there because I am going to use a quote of his that he put into one of his columns; he asks his readers if they are saying to themselves “Hey, I can do this! *Any* random person can do this!” And he counters that they are wrong, because “It takes a very special kind of random person to do this”.

And that’s how I’m tying this into EMS.

I work with a few EMT-Intermediates (I-99 curriculum) and some EMT-IV Techs (WI has a version of a basic that can start IVs with NS and give a few IV meds) that are very sour on the fact that they aren’t paramedics yet. They’re not sour on the fact that they do not yet wish to sit through the required education to become paramedics, but they’re sour that there are skills that they can’t do that they see their ALS counterparts doing. They see us “paragods” performing ALS skills and say, “Hey, I can do that”.

And it may indeed be true. I see these days that they keep pushing skills that were once only the domain of paramedics down to the BLS providers. Heck, that’s what EMS is entirely built upon. In the far beginnings of our profession (and we’re still really in the beginning phases) the skills that Paramedics and EMTs perform were once only the domain of physicians. If you would have asked a physician in the 70′s whether a non-physician could interpret an EKG and give relevant medications and treatment as well as he could, you probably would have gotten a very incredulous answer. EMS is all about proving to the medical profession that treatments once firmly entrenched as only for use in the hospital have a demonstrated benefit to the patient when used quickly at the patient’s side close to the onset of symptoms. EMS personnel were trained for that most probably because it just isn’t cost effective to have doctors sitting around manning ambulances.

However, the question that has come up in my mind is where the bottom of that lowering of educational requirements for advanced skill performance ends. I have seen in my career a paradoxical movement in educational standards for paramedics and EMTs. There are a smattering of disparate and yet somehow complimentary certifications in some states, but while some educational standards have improved, most of them have decreased. While a good argument can be made for EMS levels between the Paramedic and the EMT-Basic, such as the I-99 and the IV tech in WI or the Iowa Intermediate in Iowa in the sense that they allow rural communities to be able to perform some advanced skills without having to shoulder the full breadth of costs and responsibilities associated with full paramedics, they also don’t take into account that a lot of those skills require a whole heck of education to be safely performed in the outlying patient that can be harmed by inexperienced providers.

The debate that I got into with an EMT-IV Tech over breakfast the other morning went something like this. He brought up the fact that EMT-IVTs could administer Narcan to reverse heroin OD’s or other narcotic overdoses. His statement to that was that they ought to be then able to give Morphine for pain control “since we already carry the reversing agent” (in case they give the patient too much or the patient has a reaction). My thoughts are that they should not be able to, because the administration of a narcotic for anything requires a requisite knowledge of the pharmacologic, physiological, and social actions of the drug. And while yes, that could be covered in a module I could assume, why should it be? I brought up that it takes physicians years of experience to be able to tell how to identify drug seekers who want to get a high from the legal, medically prescribed narcotic. Contemporary medical journals in family practice and emergency medicine have written volumes on the topic, and still physicians can be fooled. The extrapyramidal reactions possible with morphine, including respiratory and other Central-Nervous-System (CNS) depressing features of the drug have other treatments and symptoms that can be hard to recognize for an inexperienced provider. An EMT-IVT just doesn’t have the breadth of background knowledge needed in order to judiciously use the drug safely in all cases. The fact that most of the time it would work out fine does not withstand the certain percentage of patients that could and would be harmed. I ended the argument with him by bringing up something that I’ve always remembered from paramedic school. Our lead instructor told us that our drug bag was nothing but “A big bag full of poison” if you didn’t know how to use it.

Remember, every single time any medical care provider performs any treatment of any kind on a patient they’re making the statement that “Right now, I know better than your body does. I know better than your brain, your nervous system, and better than all of your body’s self healing systems do what you need to keep living and get better”. Any time you put on a bandage, you’re telling that patient that you know better than their body does that they need to stop bleeding. Every time a paramedic or other provider uses an airway management technique they’re saying that they know how to breathe better for the patient than the patient’s own body does. Every time you give a medication to a patient you’re telling them that you know how best to control their body’s systems. Think about it. Every treatment, every time. It is a HUGE deal to be able to do this stuff, and you dang well better know your stuff.

Physicians are rooted in the quest for knowledge. Their reputation as learned individuals goes back to prehistory in one form or another. They’ve earned their vaulted place in society due to their quest for knowledge and reason and their caring for others above all else. EMS people came from physicians. I can think of no other medical profession that has a downward pressure on their educational standards. I’m saying that, because I think that EMS does. We have elements in our own ranks, and external forces that are continuously working to make us into skills monkeys that can be paid very little and know very little.

This is a big statement: Not everyone can be a good paramedic or EMT. It takes a certain intellect, sound ethical reasoning skills, and a level of professionalism that not everyone can attain.

This is another big statement: There are groups in our society that want to make it so that any random idiot can become a basically qualified one. This keeps us all down and lowers the quality of patient care… a lot.

Yet another: Us good EMS people should be really ticked off that educational standards are so dang low these days. Fight for excellence. Respect ourselves.

If you and or your service want to be able to perform advanced skills, earn the requisite knowledge through your studies and earn the level that it takes to do them. Enough is enough. I don’t believe that we should lower any more educational standards. No other group would do this, not the nurses, not the PA’s, and certainly not the physicians. Why should we? Yes, I understand that with the advent of Urban Fire Based EMS the IAFF and IAFC want to put more paramedics on the streets to increase their influence and their revenues, and that in order to do this they need to match the intellectual skills of medics with the intellectual skills needed to be a good grunt firefighter, but EMS is a MEDICAL profession built from the quest for knowledge. It should not be relegated to the technical performance of skills if X equals Y.

Heck, I think that the current level of Paramedic should be the basic level, and that Paramedics should be as independent as Physician Assistants. In fact, I’d like to see that in the future.

Posted by Ckemtp on March 11, 2010 • Filed under: Ambulance, EMS Topics, EMS ethics, EMS rant, EMT, EMT-Intermediate, Emergency Medical Services, Ethics, IV, Paramedic, ckemtp rants, dave barry, edemse, ems 2.0, ems education, everyday ems ethics, paramedic education, physician

Negativity, you won’t find that here.

View Comments

A conversation that I had with a coworker this morning (Hi Kim!!) gave me the incentive to write this article. It brought up a question that I have to ask you:

Do you think that reading, listening to, or otherwise consuming online content is important for:

- Your career?

- Your Service?

- Your Patients?

- Our Profession?

And, why?

You could just stop reading here and throw in your own comment in the comments section, or you could read a few sentences into my own, rambling opinion.

I’m not just talking about my own, humble website here… I’m talking about the whole cacophony of online EMS content out there. You can see a lot of the stuff that I consume regularly in my blogroll, and can find a ton of other stuff through a simple Google search. You can follow the #EMS hashtag on Twitter, or you could do a Facebook search. Needless to say, there’s a lot of stuff out there for you to read and participate in.

But why is it important that you do so?

Because it is, that’s why. Trust me. I started my blog because I’m a ten year paramedic with a family to support and I have an obligation as a professional who cares deeply about my care for my patients and my wider community to change the profession for the better. I feel a deep-seated, compelling need to fix EMS and I’m not going to rest until I’ve changed the world. I am working the streets in my community every day taking care of the same patients that you do and I see the same problems you do… not only that, I feel them the same way you do. EMS is a big part of my life, and if you’re here reading this, it’s probably a big part of yours as well. There are plenty of people out there who you see and talk to all the time that will tell you that things can’t, or won’t change… but you won’t find talk like that here.

I think that participating in the wider online community of people who care about EMS is supremely important to the growth of our profession. When we communicate, we organize. When we’re organized, we’re powerful. One of the hallmarks of a profession as described in the literature is “Self Governance”, and we can’t self govern if we can’t communicate.

So, in a nutshell, Intelligent communication and discourse is essential to our progression forward. You’ll find that here (most of the time) and you’ll find a lot more of it out there. I can’t change this on my own. I need you. Yes, you personally to help us all by talking with your coworkers, bringing them into the discussion, and participating in the discussion of powerful ideas that are going to bring our profession out of the dark ages and into what we’ve been calling EMS 2.0.

What are your thoughts?

——————————————————-

Oh, and if you’re going to be at EMS Today in Baltimore this weekend, stop by and say “Howdy!”. I’ll be at the big EMS Blogger Meetup Friday night. I’d love to meet you. Need directions?? Tweet me @ckemtp.

Posted by Ckemtp on March 4, 2010 • Filed under: EMS, EMS Blog, EMS Topics, EMS blogosphere, ems 2.0

The Shine Factor

View Comments

This is part 2 of a 3 part series on “The Shine Factor”

Part 1 of this series can be found here – The Shine Factor

Part 2 of this series can be found here – What Makes a Great Ambulance Service

Part 3 of this series can be found here – The Shine Factor – Grunts

—————————————————

You know what I’m talking about here. The distinctly subtle, but powerful mix of sights, smells, and sensory input you find when walking into the apparatus bay of your station. The faint smell of diesel exhaust mixing with rubber tires, the musty smell of damp hose drying on the rack, the smells of not-so-clean turnout gear (best right after a good fire), and all of the various cleaning products used to keep the trucks looking their best. My favorite is when I’m just walking in the station for start-of-shift. It’s about 6am and the guys before haven’t gotten up yet to turn on the lights in the bay or make noise. One of my favorite things to do is to walk around the bay with the lights off, with the sun just starting to glint in from the windows onto the dark floors. It’s quiet. I love the first sunlight making deep reflections off of the shiny paint and gleaming chrome. The trucks just seem to be anticipating the day, yearning for the next call to come in. The atmosphere is electric, and quite palpable. You could blindfold me and take me into any fire station in the country and I could identify it just by smell alone. It’s intoxicating. I think that I like it more than my fiance’s perfume. It’s ok, she’s a firefighter too. She gets it.

So, what I’m about to suggest here plays off of that knowledge that we’ve all got… It’s basically an EKG hooked right up to the morale of your organization. I call it the “Shine Factor”.

Fancy name, huh? Yea, I liked it too. I’d recommend that every person who works in any fire station or ambulance base walks into the apparatus bay every time they start their shift. Don’t go in through any other door. Walk right into the apparatus bay with the memory of the favorite time you’ve ever been there. Take a big whiff of the natural aroma and look to see how much your trucks shine. Check the corners for cobwebs too. Then, simply file the information away in your brain and know exactly how the morale of the troops is doing.

Why is this so simple, yet so powerful, and a lot of the time, so unnoticeable? It’s because every organization has grunts, and the grunts carry out the day-to-day operations of your organization. No matter how many policies are written, budgets are adhered to, or strategic plans are championed by administration, the grunts are out there actually performing the duties that make your organization do what it does. If your department is like every department in the country, the grunts have more tasks than just providing service to the public; they’re responsible for cleaning, maintenance, and upkeep of your equipment. The lower and more “gruntish” they are within the organization, the more responsible for the upkeep they are. This is where the Shine Factor comes into play. Every group has assigned or assumed maintenance and cleaning tasks. Administration can formalize it with all of the written plans, paperwork, and task sheets that they want to, but all those pieces of paper ever do is ensure that the tasks are done to the minimally acceptable level. They cannot and will not make the grunts put in the elbow grease required to get that extra shine out of the equipment. My theory is that only happiness and pride in the organization entice the grunts to go above and beyond, to put the extra few swipes with the rag onto the chrome to really bring the shine out. Think about it, when you complete a task and get it looking good enough to pass muster, you could stop… but if you really have the pride and desire to make the equipment look it’s best, you’re going to go get the magic cleaner in the storeroom and clean out the crust around the lug nuts to make it look perfect, to reflect the personal pride you have in the organization and your fellow grunts.

Do you think that the grunts will spend those extra few seconds, minutes (or in my case, hours.. but I’m obsessive) to make that floor it’s cleanest, or that chrome it’s shiniest if they’re ticked off about management’s latest asinine policy or off the cuff directive? I don’t. It’s human nature. It works on a subconscious level across all of the grunts you have who polish your stuff. If the morale of your department is in the tank, your stuff may be cleaned regularly because the grunts will be sanctioned if they don’t clean off the first layer of crud… but that’s usually where it stops. When morale goes down, the shine factor goes down. When morale goes up and people are uplifted, pride goes up and the grunts put forth the extra effort. It affects more than their performance at the station too, it affects how polite they are to the public, how clean and pressed their uniforms and presentation are reflecting your public image, it affects how much personal effort they put into training, and it may very well affect patient and emergency scene outcomes too. You can regulate all that you want, but the beatings never improve morale. The only things that can do that is respecting your grunts and treating them like adults.

I haven’t formally named it, but I think that new officers and/or managers in the EMS and Fire industry who were promoted from the troops arrive to their new posts with a predetermined agenda. I don’t think that they can help it. Usually, it’s from the mistakes they’ve seen their coworkers make on the streets around them and builds especially upon their own pet peeves. They arrive to their managerial desk wanting to “fix” things and usually the result is a lot of new policy objectives and memos. They know who, at least subconsciously, they want to get back at for the aggravation that they’ve caused them over the years and think that the rest of the organization will share their personal pet peeve. Unfortunately, these attempts to “fix” things usually do just the opposite. The new managers with their personal objectives take things to the extreme. They fail to respect that the people who committed the offenses against the manager’s pet peeves are concerned adults that may have very different pet peeves, and they fail to recognize that every single employee’s pet peeve is micromanagement.

To some managers, paper seems to solve everything. If your ambulance turn-around times are too long in your opinion, you create a paper system to fix it complete with a memo and/or a new policy. The crews fill it out, and it’s supposed to make the management and crews aware of the time it takes them and it’s supposed to fix the problem. Got dirty floors in the trucks? Make a “clean floor” policy with a tracking sheet. Got a crew who uses too much gauze? Make a “Gauze Utilization” flowchart with a tracking sheet. Does your station go through too much toilet paper? You see what I mean. While all management wants to create measurable objectives, all employees hate being micromanaged.

Shortly after I got my first management position my boss, the COO, related to me a story about what he did one day when he found a truck that had been left absolutely filthy by a crew after their shift. Apparently this crew hadn’t been running more than usual that day, and had just left the ambulance filthy. Now, what he could have done, being the COO and all, is write an edict to be handed down through the chain-of-command to have the crew reprimanded from on high about the clean truck policy and the proper utilization of cleaning materials. He could have written a memorandum, or even a shiny new “Clean Truck” policy to enforce the rules. There could have been reams of paper and managerial-type fire power brought down on these guys. But that’s not what he did.

When the crew who had left the truck that dirty came back in for their day shift the next morning the COO met them at the door and lead them to their ambulance. At their ambulance they found a whole host of cleaning supplies… and two chairs. The COO then proceeded to have the medics sit in the chairs while he cleaned their entire ambulance, inside and out, from top to bottom.

Unorthodox? Sure.. Effective? Yes. The problem had been attended to, the desire for a clean
truck was reinforced, and the crews saw just how badly the COO wanted the trucks to be cleaned. Now maybe that’s not something that would work at your department, but it sure seemed to at this ambulance service. Maybe your shine factor would be increased if the grunts got the chance to work with the brass on solving problems like this. Maybe myriad policies aren’t the answer, and teamwork and mutual respect are the answer. Maybe communication increases it. Maybe the full realization by everyone within the organization that everyone has their roles and everyone has to be given the tools to take responsibility for what they own increases it.

Until now, this piece has focused on management, but us grunts can benefit from increased shine factor as well. Right now, you need to decide that you’re going to put in the effort to increase the shine factor in your department. Remember, it’s a subconscious thing. Everyone just feels better when it looks like people are taking pride in the department. Everyone from your partner, the guys, the brass, the public… even you. If the grunts make the effort, it can benefit the shine factor too and maybe the other stuff will come along with it. Positive attitudes breed positive results. It sounds corny, but someone’s gotta make the decision to be the positive change in the organization. Even in a perfect situation, if there even is one, someone’s gotta keep making the decision to keep it that way. Let that be you and others will follow suit.

Now get out there and polish some chrome.

——————————————————————-

This is part 2 of a 3 part series on “The Shine Factor”

Part 1 of this series can be found here – The Shine Factor

Part 2 of this series can be found here – What Makes a Great Ambulance Service

Part 3 of this series can be found here – The Shine Factor – Grunts

Posted by Ckemtp on February 28, 2010 • Filed under: Administration & Leadership, Ambulance, Ambulance maintenance, Command & Leadership, EMS, EMS Health & Safety, EMS Management, EMS Motivation, EMS Topics, EMS pep talk, EMT, Emergency Medical Services, Fire Rescue Topics, Fire department, Firefighter, Firefighter Safety & Health, Management, PR, Paramedic, Public relations, ems 2.0, pride, profession, professionalism

Two Cases, One letter – From one Paramedic’s struggles, change can come

View Comments

A letter I received from a reader recently has gotten me just as mad as he is, even more so maybe. This letter came in from someone who identifies himself as a paramedic but asks that I protect his identity and location completely. I will do so, only identifying that the letter comes from someone who works out west, somewhere between the Mississippi and Montana but not east as Maine or as far south as Amarillo.

So He comes from somewhere in the US, not the east coast, and not Hawaii. He’s a paramedic and he’s male. That’s all I’ll say. I’m going to work the things he wrote me in his letter with my thoughts and feelings on what he wrote and the situation he wrote about. I’ll rewrite the letter keeping the point of it intact. I’m fairly sure that you’ll be just as angered as I. (Note – This is LONG but it’s good. It will probably tick you off too, enjoy)

(more…)

Posted by Ckemtp on February 25, 2010 • Filed under: Administration & Leadership, DNR, Do Not Resuscitate Order, EMS, EMS Health & Safety, EMS Management, EMS Topics, EMS ethics, EMS paramedics, EMS system, Emergency Medical Services, Ethics, Line of Duty, PR, Paramedic, Patient Handovers, Patient Management, Public relations, change, ckemtp rants, edemse, ems 2.0, ems education, everyday ems ethics, medical ethics, paramedic education, patient care, politics, potential, pride, profession, professionalism, rant, stories

The Chronicles of EMS – Day 3?? Who knows, I’m flying

View Comments

My goodness I’ve got to get into this room! That was a long set we’ve just had. Oh yea, Mark’s in the building so I had better check the lock on the door. It’s locked… good. I shouldn’t have had so much coffee in preparation for the talk I just had. Was I nervous? A bit maybe… I feel silly about it though. After all, I was really just shooting the “breeze” with some people who have become good friends of mine over the last year or so and I honestly feel pretty comfortable being in front of the community that’s popped up around the Chronicles of EMS.

Yes I was talking about what the Frumpydumple crowd calls the “water closet” and I had just gotten done filming Episode #1 of “Chronicles of EMS – A Seat at the Table” with an amazing panel of guests. I can’t tell you how much I’ve enjoyed being here in San Francisco to watch this all take place, I can’t really put into words how much I have enjoyed meeting the people I’ve gotten to meet, and I just wouldn’t do the feeling of inspiration I’ve gotten any justice if I were to put it into static black and white words on this page. For you to know how I feel about this I’ll just have to use an analogy.

Picture that you’ve been laboring in a tunnel for years, digging as fast as you could every day you were down there. You’re passionate about your digging but you don’t really know if you’re ever going to get anywhere before you run out of steam. You dig and dig and dig… Then one day you feel like you can’t dig any more… not even one more shovel full of dirt… You’re tired, cold, hungry, and cranky and it feels like eons since you’ve seen the sun… Finding Herculean strength you tell yourself that this shovel full of dirt may be the one that finally counts, so you dig the shovel into the dirt and…

Break through into an underground lake that fills the tunnel with water and sweeps you away.

And just when you find you’re about to drown you start a blog and find out that there’s people out there that will throw you a lifeline. You reach out to them and find yourself at a television premier in San Francisco having the time of your life.

So um, yea. That’s how it is. See why I said that I couldn’t do it any justice?

I was here to watch the show and I’m still here writing this from my hotel room. I have to say this: We all knew that Mark and Justin were caring, competent paramedics who are fantastic at what they do. It wasn’t really a shock to me to see them portrayed in the video as just that. No camera could hide how much they care about this stuff and it wouldn’t be possible to hide how committed to the cause of furthering emergency medical care around the world as they are. I know them, they’re really, truly good people and I’ll vouch for them. What impressed me, nay, amazed me the most was the quality of the camera work and the production of the film. I was quite literally blown away by the superb quality of the production. Hats off to Chris Eldridge and Ted Setla… You guys honestly blew right past my preconceptions and delivered a product that was way beyond my expectations. I mean, I knew that it was going to be good… I just did not expect the quality to be so high. I had high expectations and you blew past them. That’s solid work guys. I know that there were many behind the scenes that I don’t know all of the names of to thank properly, but rest assured that I am thoroughly impressed by the class act that you have developed here.

So what I am saying is: Thank you. Thank you for the work you have done to further our profession and emergency medical care around the world. I am happy and downright honored to have played a small part in it and I cannot wait to see the heights that you all reach with this endeavor.

You guys rock.

So tonight, I am frankly having way too much fun here with my wife over Valentine’s day hanging out with the Chronicles Crowd to spend any more time on this computer. I’ve met a ton of great people, all of which I will dish about (Mwa Ha Ha ha!) in a later post. But tonight is about fun, and off I go.

Here’s some suggested reading:

Http://www.setlafilms.com – Ted Setla’s Production Company

Http://www.LevelZeroMovie.com – The Level Zero Movie (I have a signed copy!!)

Http://www.ChroniclesOfEMS.com – The page for #CoEMS

MsParamedic’s article on #CoEMS – Great Meeting you!

EMS1.com ‘s article on #CoEMS

David Konig’s article on #CoEMS

FireGeezer’s Article on #CoEMS – Really? Johnny and Roy?? Well, maybe…

Fire Daily’s article on #CoEMS – Bromance indeed

And Just to Enhance the Social Media Experience – I put out a tweet looking for posts that referenced the meetup this weekend. Here are the ones I’ve gotten so far:

- From @FirstDueMedic - http://gatesofintegrity.blogspot.com/2010/02/are-we-ready.html

- From @ssgjbroyles - http://1union801.blogspot.com/2010/02/chronicles-of-ems.html

Posted by Ckemtp on February 13, 2010 • Filed under: Ambulance, EMS, EMS Blog, EMS Conference, EMS Health & Safety, EMS Motivation, EMS Topics, EMS blogosphere, EMS ethics, EMS pep talk, Paramedic, ems 2.0, ems education

Some updates LIVE from San Francisco and the Chronicles of EMS – Friday Morning

View Comments

Hello! Gina Kaiser and I are on the ground in San Francisco headed to the premier party for the Chronicles of EMS! The festivities start at 4pm Pacific time Feb 12th (Which is 6pm for us midwesterners) and will be streamed live. It’s going to be great. There are a lot of big names from the industry here and everyone I’ve met has been so cool.

Here’s the link for the stream from tonight:

http://www.ustream.tv/channel/coems-meetup

If you’d like more background on the event and the television show that is changing our EMS world for the better, head to

http://www.chroniclesofems.com

Tomorrow there will be another live streaming show, “Chronicles of EMS – A Seat at The Table” which will feature a roundtable discussion about EMS issues facing the nation and the world that includes some pretty big name industry experts… and me too There will be a link to that up here as soon as I find it.

Have you got your local premier party organized yet? Lemme know when you do and I’ll give you a shoutout over the magical interwebs machine.

Posted by Ckemtp on February 12, 2010 • Filed under: EMS, EMS Topics, ems 2.0

Pop! Changes the Industry… Here We Go!

View Comments

Are your coworkers, friends, and colleagues following the Chronicles of EMS?

I ask that, because I’m wondering something. You, the person reading this blog post, are special. You’re probably a Fire or EMS professional that came to my blog site to read up on your profession. That makes you part of an elite and growing group of industry professionals who cares just a little bit more than some of your peers do. I’m guessing that you’re excited about your profession and I’m also guessing that you wonder how excited your colleagues and friends are about this stuff that you’ve been seeing online and in a few other places as well.

Well I’m wondering the same thing.

For all of you Paramedics and EMTs that have been hoping for the industry to spring forward into some of the awesome, groundbreaking things that we’ve been talking about like I have, this could be your moment.

No really, there’s plenty of people out there that are going to tell you “It’s never going to happen”, “It’s all been tried before”, and, “That’s never going to fly here in anytownistan”. I’m not one of those people. I’m one of the people that is going to tell you that those kind of people are wrong… and not only am I about to tell you that, I’m also about to get on a plane so that I can show you.

While the Chronicles of EMS are just sooooo very cool, they’re standing on the pinnacle of a lot of work. If you’ve paid attention on Twitter and Facebook, you might have noticed that there are some big names coming out for this. These names belong to people you might have seen in magazine articles, textbooks, journals, television shows, and in lots of other places. I am going to the Chronicles Premier party and I get to meet some of the people whose names were printed on my original EMT-Basic textbook. These people are as committed as I am to the work that Justin Shorr, Mark Glencourse, and Thaddeus Setla have put in to the Chronicles of EMS and you should be too.

But what if you can’t make it all the way out to San Francisco for the premier party? What do you do then to show your support? Well first off, look online at Chronicles of EMS for the live feed. Watch it. But, before you do, tell your coworkers, friends, and extended colleagues about it. Even if they might think that it’s a little geeky, please do it anyway.

That’s just it. We need you out there plugging in your hometown just as hard as we are out there in San Francisco (swilling martinis, and) plugging this whole EMS 2.0 thing. If you bring in your friends and coworkers to the wider conversation and have your own local conversation to interface with everyone else we’ve all won. The more people we bring in, and the more people YOU PERSONALLY pull in to this, the better off we’re going to be. I pledge that I’m not going to quit trying to improve our profession and I know that my buddies out there aren’t going to quit anytime soon either.

We need you to be just as passionate. As soon as we energize everyone out there, the sooner we all look up and go “Wow! Look at that!” Please, please, please help us spread the exciting message that EMS WILL CHANGE FOR THE BETTER in the very near future. Bug your coworkers. Get the word out.

Heck, if I get an e-mail at ProEMS1@yahoo.com or a tweet at http://www.twitter.com/ckemtp I will personally mention you live on the show, give a link to your service’s website, and might even send a special shoutout. So if you organize your own local premier party, please let me know.

You all Rock, let’s get flying!

P.S: Want behind the scenes access?? Follow my wife Gkemtp(IT), @ginakaiser on twitter too. She’ll be with me and will be tweeting about cool stuff like how awkward I am when I meet my heroes.

Posted by Ckemtp on February 11, 2010 • Filed under: EMS, EMS Blog, EMS Topics, EMS system, Emergency Medical Services, Emergency Nurse, Paramedic, Uncategorized, edemse, ems 2.0, medicblog999

Why I am Passionate about the Chronicles of EMS

View Comments

If you’re an EMS professional, you should be paying attention to the Chronicles of EMS.

I think every person involved in EMS on any level needs to pay attention to the work of three of the profession’s upcoming giants, Mark Glencourse, Justin Schorr, and Thaddeus Setla. Their collective project is a warp-leap forward for how our profession is presented to, judged by, and thought about by our internal and external observers, customers, and colleagues. With their efforts come Hope… Hope that one day soon EMS will take its rightful place as a true profession; Hope that our profession will get the paid the attention that it deserves; Hope that our educational standards, resource needs, and compensation will finally be improved; and Hope that we will be able to improve our total service to our patients and our community through shedding a new light on our profession.

If this works… everything could change. Everything could change quickly, incredibly, and wonderfully. Imagine if EMS became “cool” and the public finally thought about who we are, what we are, and what it is that we do for them. Imagine if people demanded that their community leaders pay as much attention to EMS as we need them too… Just Imagine.

EMS needs a strong, unified message. The Chronicles of EMS can be that message. It is a professional, smart, and uber-cool message aimed straight at where we want to be going. It is not lip service, it is not Hollywood glamour, and it is certainly not dramatized for profit. It is being prepared by industry-experts who are still working the same streets that we are everyday. Everyone involved is one of us. Everyone involved is passionate. Everyone involved wants this, and they want it as bad as you do.

The reason I write about EMS is because I want to improve our profession and our service to others. I want to make this better so bad that I can taste it and I’m willing to work as hard as I have to. Our patients and our communities deserve the best we can give them and I believe that key to fixing EMS is communication and the spreading of our message. This blog exists for that reason and so do the other blogs in this genre. The other bloggers, authors, speakers, and writers I’ve met have all spoken to me of the same goals. Our profession exists to save lives and alleviate suffering and improving our profession help us save more lives and alleviate more suffering in our communities. EMS does indeed make a difference out there in the world and we’re the ones doing it. The Chronicles of EMS is a great beacon of hope in our collective quest.

EMS Deserves More. Our Patients deserve more; Our Families deserve more; and yes… We deserve more. Mark, Justin, Ted, and everyone involved in the Chronicles of EMS are working hard to give us just that. They deserve our support and our attention.

I’ll be in San Francisco on March 11^th for the premier of their pilot episode. I wouldn’t miss it for anything. Look out world, EMS is moving forward.

Posted by Ckemtp on February 8, 2010 • Filed under: Administration & Leadership, Command & Leadership, EMS, EMS Blog, EMS Health & Safety, EMS Management, EMS Topics, EMS blogosphere, EMS training, EMT, Emergency Medical Services, Fire Rescue Topics, Firefighter Safety & Health, Happy Medic, Line of Duty, News, Paramedic, Patient Management, Public relations, change, ems 2.0, ems education, humor, medicblog999, paramedic education, pride, profession, professionalism

Questions About EMS on a sleepy morning – Care to answer?

View Comments

It is a very sleepy morning for me today. Yesterday was a hard-fought day on the ambulance by our standards. For the first part of the day I couldn’t run a call without somebody getting angry at me. It really didn’t bother me all that much, but you know how it goes. I actually got about 6 hours of sleep during the night though, so I got that going for me. Perhaps it’s the morning fog mixed with the lack of coffee available in the station this morning that’s causing my AM neural firings to generate random questions… perhaps I’m just nuts. However, if y’all would like to think about some things (and perhaps answer in the comments section, please) I invite you to join in on my personal morning groggies.

Here goes:

If Medicare would assign a payment that you could access for treating and releasing patients, thereby diverting them from the Emergent healthcare system and redirecting them to the more cost effective healthcare system, how would that change the industry?

If your service could choose to accept a lower payment from Medicare and Medicaid for every transport without regard to the nuances of medical necessity and never have to be denied reimbursement in exchange for a lower payment for every call, would your service take it? How would that change the industry?

How would you improve your service if all of a sudden a big, national competitor moved into your service area and started taking your share of the market… you’re losing calls to them and it’s affecting your bottom line… What do you do to improve your service to keep yourself in business?

How would you change your care if your medical director was watching over your shoulder on every call? What would change if it were your mother watching you?

I think that these questions aren’t the biggest questions facing the industry today, but I’ll bet ya’ that if they were considered by peons like us and also by the powers that our landscape would change quite a bit, wouldn’t it?

See you in the comment’s section.

Posted by Ckemtp on January 26, 2010 • Filed under: Administration & Leadership, Command & Leadership, EMS, EMS Management, EMS Topics, Economics, Emergency Medical Services, Funding & Staffing, Patient Management, change, ems 2.0

Are We the Gatekeepers to the Emergency Healthcare System? – EMS 2.0

View Comments

Did I do good?

The Chronicles of EMS, if you’re living under a rock and you haven’t heard, is a cooperative effort between the Great Filmmaker Thaddeus Setla (EMSmedia.tv), the Remarkably Strong Paramedic Mark Glencourse (Medic999), and the “Ruggedly Handsome” firefighter/paramedic Justin Schorr (The Happy Medic). Their cooperative venture has taught me things that I’ve put to use in my own EMS practice that I believe have improved my care. Mark showed me the UK’s “Front Loaded” model and Justin has been talking about EMS providers being a gatekeeper to the emergency healthcare system. It’s a powerful collaboration. (Be sure to follow #CoEMS on twitter and become a fan of Chronicles of EMS on Facebook as well)

So here’s an example of what I mean. I can talk about this now because it’s been long enough that I can sufficiently muddle any possible trace back to the patient and fulfill any patient confidentiality concerns. I work in two very diverse service areas and cover approximately 35 different skilled nursing facilities at any one time. So in the time since the Chronicles of EMS has come out I’ve transported umpteen-hundred patients from those facilities and the patient I’m writing about could be any of those umpteen hundred. So there’s no way to violate confidentiality, Mmmm ‘Kay?

Anyway, some time ago I was dispatched as the ALS response to backup a BLS ambulance for the “unresponsive” patient at a skilled nursing facility. I arrived a few seconds after the ambulance did and carried my drug bag and EKG/Defib into the facility with the ambulance crew following close behind with their jump kit, the cot, and a backboard. After a few seconds in the facility, a staff member directed me to the Physical Therapy area of the facility which was a bit of a walk. When I got there, I saw three other staff members huddled around an elderly female patient who was seated in a reclining chair.

The staff members were fairly excited about the situation, as was the patient, who was very much conscious and alert. The story everyone told me at once was that the patient had finished her physical therapy session on her upper body to strengthen her shoulders and had been sat in the chair by the PT Assistant to rest. After a few minutes, the PT asst. came to check on the patient and found her unresponsive to verbal stimuli, by which I mean that the patient would not awake when spoken to. The PT asst. called the facility’s emergency response team and another staff member activated 911. When one of the nurses arrived, the patient awoke to a sternal rub and was quite surprised to be the subject of so much attention. She had been fully alert and cognitive since that time and when I asked her she denied any chief complaint other than being understandably emotional about the situation.

As I do with every patient after I rule out any immediate life threats I moved into a more detailed assessment. My lady here had skin that was Pink, Warm, and dry. Her pupils were PERRL and her Cincinatti Pre-hospital stroke scale was negative. Her Lungs were clear, her abdomen was soft and non-tender with normoactive bowel sounds, and her extremities were warm and had good pulses, motor, and sensation. Her blood glucose was well within limits, and so were all of her vital signs. All of my other assessment findings were not indicative of any acute abnormalities other than a complaint of slight shoulder pain and weakness which could have been indicative of either an acute MI or of a rigorous PT session. So, to be even more thorough, I hooked her up to my 5-lead EKG which showed normal sinus rhythm with some peaked T-waves. I then ran a 12-lead EKG which was admittedly probably better than mine is.

I asked the nurse “Has she had a potassium level drawn recently?” She looked through the patient’s chart and found out that the patient in fact had been tested for that two days prior and had been found to have a slightly elevated serum potassium level. Since they had been active witnesses to my assessment we agreed that other than for perhaps a bit too much potassium there was little chance of anything being wrong with the patient.

Since we were here in the US and not in the UK like Mark, where he can treat and release (or “Respond, not Convey”) I asked the patient if she wanted us to take her to the hospital. She didn’t want to go and said that she just wanted to go back to bed. When the staff members weren’t completely convinced that we shouldn’t transport her, I suggested that they call the patient’s primary care physician to ask him what his wishes were. The nurse did so, and called from her cell phone in front of us. She did a good job of explaining in detail the events of the call and our collective assessment findings, I provided my interpretation of the 12-lead EKG and chimed in with my assessment findings that I use in my acute care practice.

For his part, the doctor was amenable to treating the patient at the facility and stated that he was comfortable with us not transporting the patient. He ordered a few stat labs and requested that we leave a copy of the 12-lead for the patient’s chart, which I was happy to do. Bottom line: The patient signed a refusal and was happy not to have to go to the hospital; The skilled-nursing-facility staff members were happy that the patient was in no immediate danger; and I was happy that we had made the best possible decision for the patient and that I wasn’t exposing her to unnecessary risk.

What happened here is exactly one of the things that I and others have been talking about with the EMS 2.0 movement: EMS people having the ability to make an educated and sound decision about the best possible healthcare options for our patients and not simply having to activate the full emergency healthcare system for every complaint. This case had every element of that and I believe that the patient being redirected through her normal primary healthcare pathway was a much better choice than taking her to the emergency room.

Heck, since there turned out to be no adverse results to this, and since the patient was probably on Medicare, I would surmise that I’ve ended up saving the taxpayers thousands of dollars in unneccesary costs… Huh? Can educating and empowering paramedics “save” the healthcare system in the US by creating a huge savings in the most expensive form of providing healthcare?

What do you think? Did I do good?

QGE5GE5AAH4W

Posted by Ckemtp on January 21, 2010 • Filed under: EKG, EMS, EMS Topics, EMS ethics, Emergency Medical Services, Ethics, Patient Management, Skilled Nursing Facility, US economy, change, edemse, ems 2.0, ems education, everyday ems ethics, medical ethics, new perspective, patient care, physician, politics, potential

Expanding Our Career Options – Non-Traditional EMS Jobs

View Comments

In my decade or so working in EMS, I’ve had the chance to ply my paramedic skills in more places than the back of an ambulance. I’ve been employed as an ER technician, which is of course the usual suspect for a paramedic looking to move their career options from more than just “The back of the truck” and “the front of the truck”, I’ve been employed as a security guard *slash* paramedic for a hospital chain that ran an ambulance service using their security department, and I’ve worked as a paramedic in an urgent care clinic. I think that EMTs and paramedics can and should expand their career options and that to do so, we’ve got to take a few collective steps.

The professional knowledge, skills, and abilities held by a paramedic combined with the unique personal characteristics of successful EMS people makes our profession a valuable resource to a wide variety of potential employers. These employers, beyond the traditional ambulance services, fire departments, and emergency healthcare providers, stand to benefit greatly from opening their hiring processes to paramedics, as does our profession and the general public. Imagine one day that you’ll type in the word “Paramedic” into your favorite job search engine and have more options available to you than you’ve ever thought possible. Imagine that one day when you’ve progressed to a point in your career where the prospect of getting up at all hours of the day and night no longer sounds like a good idea you would be able to get a job that is a better fit to your personality and your unique set of side skills. I say that our ability to improvise, to think quickly on our feet, and to make solid decisions based upon our knowledge base and experiences in the face of limited and evolving information are useful to business in this day and age.

At the urgent care clinic where I worked, there rarely was a call for my advanced life support skills. Rather we had the run-of-the mill cases that would come into the clinic for immediate-access primary care. My skills at patient history-taking, assessment, triage, and bandaging got a work-out. So did my skills in relating to patients on a personal level and interfacing with patients and their families across the demographic spectrum. I also learned how to prepare, acquire, and process various laboratory tests including point-of-care testing for common conditions and how to properly obtain and prepare samples for advanced labs. Surprisingly perhaps, I got a great deal more practice drawing-up, mixing, and administering medications more so than I ever have in the field. Working with the doctors greatly improved my skills as a diagnostician and has helped me immeasurably in my ambulance practice. (Yes, I said “my ambulance practice”) I highly recommend for both Urgent Care Clinics as well as for paramedics to explore this wonderful partnership.

What that experience taught me is that I could “fit” into that job description as a paramedic, it also taught me that there was a learning curve in moving out of the ambulance arena and into a clinical one. In my secret squirrel job that I don’t put out here on the blog, I use my healthcare background as a statistician and data management guru of sorts to help make decisions for a large organization assisting a lot of smaller ones and dealing with a lot of people. There was a learning curve there too, but my experience as a paramedic with knowledge of the real-world of healthcare makes a huge difference and brings a lot to the table. Nurses have expanded into this role for quite a while, and a lot of organizations from Education to Public health employ nurses in a lot of capacities apart from their traditional role as a bedside caregiver. Paramedics and EMTs can and should do this as well.

Previously, I had envisioned a certification as a “Clinical Paramedic” to provide paramedics with the knowledge and skills required to function in a physician’s office setting. I still believe that having additional certifications that build upon our initial licensure and education is the way to go. Imagine that once you attain your initial paramedic education there would be multiple educational options for you to choose from that would lead to a wide variety of career paths. You could be a “Public Health” paramedic working in the inner city to improve health standards and access to care, you could be a “Clinical Paramedic” staffing a clinic, working in primary or specialty healthcare, or you could be some type of “Specialty Paramedic” working perhaps as a liaison with children with special healthcare needs for a community organization. The possibilities are literally endless if we dare to explore our options and trumpet our strengths as a profession to the masses.

In order to do this, we’ll have to fall back on the “We Need More Education” answer as well as exploring how our licensing bodies will have to modify our legal scope of practice to allow us to function in these roles. I’m afraid that we’ll have to fight to “own” our licenses like the nurses do (and AmboDriver, you could weigh in on this) but the fight will be worth it.

I’d love to hear from my readers about how they apply their EMS skills in a manner outside of our traditional role. This is a subject area where I believe our brethren in the volunteer part of our industry can assist us greatly in explaining how their EMS training helps them in their primary occupation. If you are an EMT, Paramedic, jump in and help move us forward. What would do as a medic and what would you like to be doing tomorrow?

Posted by Ckemtp on January 18, 2010 • Filed under: Ambulance, EMS, EMS Management, EMS Topics, EMT-Intermediate, EMT-Paramedic Specialist, ER, Emergency Medical Services, Paramedic, change, ems 2.0, new perspective, paramedic education, physician, potential, profession, salary

EMS Pay Sucks!! (Part 4) – We Control the Market

View Comments

I read a short article in Entrepreneur Magazine (to which I subscribe) that had a story about a sign hanging in a shop somewhere that said this:

“Low Price. High Quality. Good Service. – Pick two”

The saying goes that consumers can pick two of the above things that they feel are most important to them in their buying decisions. It also implies that businesses can focus and compete on two of the three, but they can’t do them all.

I agree with the sign. It shows in the fact that there are multiple outlets in the marketplace to purchase similar goods and services. If you’re price sensitive and don’t want the highest quality of furniture you buy from Ikea and assemble your purchase yourself. If you’re always after the best quality you go to a custom furniture builder who would be more than happy to deliver and install for the price you’re paying him. As always, if you as a consumer do not like what the merchant has for sale you “vote with your feet” and go somewhere else to spend your hard-earned money.

And that is how “the market” works. Businesses compete with one another for your patronage and this competition keeps their prices as low as the consumers are willing to pay for the level of quality they are willing to accept. People are willing to accept lesser quality products for lower cost as much as they are willing to pay more for better quality. Service and support plays a role in there too as nobody wants to get burned on a deal, product, or service. If your widget store has exactly the same quality of widgets for sale with the same service as the widget store across the street, people are going to buy the widgets at the lowest cost. Change any of the price/quality/service variables and the sales will follow where the consumer sees the best value. Of course I’ve oversimplified this a bit as the system we call “the free market” is infinitely nuanced in its simplicity, but this is indeed an EMS article. So don’t even get me started on that Adam Smith guy and his sleight of hand.

So why am I bringing forth this short little explanation of the free market? It’s because the ambulance industry is a service provider. Unfortunately (or fortunately if you prefer) we’re not entirely bent upon the whims of the marketplace due to the governmental regulations that set our price, control our service types, and dictate how we run our businesses. You probably know that Ambulance Services are “service providers” as they provide a service to our patients in exchange for fees paid for that service (ha!) and their tax revenues, but did you know that the Paramedics and EMTs are collectively a “service provider” for the ambulance industry itself?

Follow me here for a bit. If you separate out the collective “ambulance industry” from the collective EMTs and Paramedics making up the Profession of Paramedicine, you can see that there are two separate groups functioning in tandem. While we’ve always been inseparable and have been defined as one collective group, I suggest that we are really two entities. The Profession (Defined here as the Paramedics and EMTs together) and the ambulance industry (defined as the places we most usually work).The ambulance industry needs a service from the Profession in the form of us providing them with bodies to run their trucks, and we need them to employ us. If you were to take this thought further, we as members of the Profession compete with one another to provide our services to the various ambulance companies in the form of applying to and accepting positions with them under whatever conditions they set for us. They set the pay rates, benefits, shift schedules, etc and we paramedics compete with each other for the positions… usually accepting less compensation than we wished to receive as a condition of being employed.

Historically, our profession has competed on price as evidenced by the fact that our pay rates are much lower than we want to accept for our services. According to the above analogy, as we push our price lower either the quality of our education and skills or our level of service is going to suffer for it. One needs to look no further than their own paycheck to see that the pay is terrible. One also needs to look no further than their local “Medic Mill” school that exists solely to pump out EMTs and Paramedics with “a pulse and an EMT card” at the lowest possible cost with the absolute minimum level of education. We’ve become the Wal-Mart of ambulance staff, always rolling back our prices and lowering quality to encourage more and more demand.

If I have any liberty to speak to our profession I ask that today we all make the collective decision to compete on “High Quality” and “Good Service”, leaving “Low Price” behind. Frankly it hasn’t worked for our profession to provide our services for the low bid price. The subsequent drop in the quality of our education and services isn’t the best for our patients. We’ll always compete amongst each other to provide our services to the ambulance industry (I.E. apply for jobs) but if we all accept that we’re no longer competing on “Low Price”, we’ll all reap the benefits. Our patients will as well.

I suggest that we begin to “vote with our feet” more often in our quest for employment. If there are multiple ambulance services in your town, pick the one that offers the best pay and benefits and apply there for your employment. If and when you get hired, work like heck to make them the dominant ambulance company in the marketplace. Once the other competitors realize that the ambulance service with the best pay and benefits is gaining a competitive advantage, they’ll change… or be forced out of business. What you’ll begin to see is that the ambulance service that pays the best will begin to be able to “get what they pay for” from the profession in the fact that they will only hire the best qualified among us. Therefore we’ll begin to have to compete on quality and service to get hired for the best pay. We’ll no longer be competing on price alone. You’ll have to put more effort into the profession, but you’ll reap the rewards in terms of higher pay and benefits.

In addition, we need more Medicpreneurs. I’ve said before that the only way to make a lot of money in this game is to be the owner of a service. What’s to say that you can’t start your own ambulance company to put your boss out of business? Hire the best of your coworkers and pay them what they deserve. Do your best and work very hard every day. Soon enough, you’ll win if you can beat the market. You’ll be helping your profession and yourself as well.

When we begin to see the collective power that we wield as a profession in the marketplace we can begin to change the marketplace to fit our wishes. If we want EMS 2.0 to go ahead and get here already we’ve got to collectively become aware of our power and our duty to control the playing field. We haven’t won yet, let’s change the rules so we do. We owe it to our families, our patients, and everyone who depends on us. Wake Up EMS. We control the game here folks… We just have to realize the power we have together.

Low Price. High Quality. Good Service – Which two do you pick?

Posted by Ckemtp on January 7, 2010 • Filed under: Administration & Leadership, EMS, EMS Management, EMS Topics, EMS pay sucks, EMS rant, Economics, Emergency Medical Services, Funding & Staffing, US economy, change, ems 2.0, ems salary, paramedic salary, politics, potential, salary

Fiddling While Rome Burns – The “Ambulance Industry”

View Comments

Allow me if you will to allude to some Roman history here. I know that it’s a little heavy for an EMS blog but if you would please search the dusty recesses of your memories to think of the Roman Emperor Nero, it would help this post. You know, the one who “fiddled while Rome burned”

I am way oversimplifying this, but the way that I remember the story was that Rome was being swept by the “Great Fire of Rome” that burned for days and decimated the city. Popular legend has it that Nero, unconcerned with the plight of his citizenry, played the fiddle while the city was burning.

(Although, the MOST TRUSTWORTHY SITE ON THE INTERNET *Other than Mine* has this on the subject: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Fire_of_Rome)

Recent events and some things that I’ve been reading lately have brought some EMS issues to light in my mind, and thoughts about good ol’ Nero have popped into my head.

Are we Fiddling while Rome Burns?

There’s a few competing EMS system design models out there that have various people in their camps. Mention the virtues of one over another and you will get passionate and snarky responses from the various members of these camps. Trash Fire Based EMS and you’ll get a ton of people that will take a break from lifting weights and will bombard you with reasons while Fire Based EMS is awesome while wearing their T-Shirts emblazoned with “FIRE RULES!!”. Mention that 3^rd service and not-for-profit EMS may have their downfalls and the EMS Chess Club will bring forth obscure research that shows how much better they are for the patients than everyone else is. Trash Private-for-profit EMS and um, the employees thereof will trash it right along with you and their management will be too busy putting out fires to care.

Try as you might to convince me that one is better than the other and I’ll agree with you on some points and disagree with you on others. I will only endorse what I call “EMS based EMS”, which is EMS provided by truly dedicated caregivers who base their decisions and actions simply upon what is best for their patients and their communities. I have my beef with fire based services that place protecting firefighter jobs and the “fun” stuff involving spraying water on things that happen to be on fire over solid patient care. I have my beef with private-for-profit services that always default to the bottom line, and admittedly, I have a bias towards third service and not-for-profit EMS agencies. However, no one system has ever proven to be a good fit for every community, none are inherently evil, and other professions find their fit within lots of configurations.

If the system design models out there are really locked into a competition for the soul of EMS then they’ve all got a lot of work to do. In this piece, I’m going to ignore patient outcomes, efficient use of tax money, and all of the stuff that I usually talk about… and focus on one thing and one thing only.

The way EMS people are treated by the competing systems will probably decide this debate we’ve got going on here. The model that treats the paramedics the best will win and will take over the industry. Why wouldn’t it? What paramedic with half of a brain would continue to work in a service model that didn’t pay and treat them the best?

Here in Northern Illinois, there are very few options for a paramedic that doesn’t want to do Fire Based EMS for one reason or another. The few options that there are don’t pay nearly as well as the fire-based groups and this creates an endless revolving door of young paramedics entering the system, working the “privates” for a while, while trying to get a “real job” with a fire department. The private services suffer for it, and the fire based services reap the benefits while fostering a system that (gulp, here it comes) focuses less on the healthcare and more on the fun stuff.

So I challenge the private, third-service, and not-for-profit services out there with my next statement.

You’re fiddling while Rome burns.

If you aren’t out there doing your absolute damndest to treat your employees well and pay them what they deserve, you’re failing. You push your employees away. You push the best and brightest into other professions and into fire-based EMS which hands down has the best pay and benefit structure. Your lack of interest in caring for your caregivers is killing our profession. You fiddle whilst complaining about decreased reimbursements and failing to do anything about it. You fiddle whilst focusing on minutia like stupid rules and regulations that degrade the dignity of the adults who work for you. You fiddle while worrying about protecting your jurisdictional boundaries and contracts while they’re eroded away by the constant stream of departing employees.

Nero could have been an ambulance manager in some of the services I’ve been to, worked for, and observed from the outside. Could he be you?

You have got to find a way to pay your people better. I don’t know exactly how it’s going to happen either, but it has to be priority #1 for every ambulance manager out there. Trust me, if you don’t do it you will find that your capital city has burned to the ground. You will lose your empire and it will not come back. If you aren’t out there doing every possible thing you can to keep your employees as happy as you can get them, you’re fiddling, and you’re failing our profession.

This blog has a lot of content on it that explores new revenue sources for ambulance organizations already. Coming soon: Ways for each individual EMS professional to take control of our own income potential, own our profession, and improve our care to our patients. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again folks, hang on cuz it’s going to get fun.

Posted by Ckemtp on January 6, 2010 • Filed under: 911 fail, Administration & Leadership, Command & Leadership, EMS, EMS Health & Safety, EMS Management, EMS Topics, EMS paramedics, EMS pay sucks, EMS rant, Economics, Emergency Medical Services, Funding & Staffing, Management, Paramedic, change, ckemtp rants, ems 2.0, ems salary, paramedic salary, politics, profession

EMS Pay Sucks!! (part 3) – Who or What is at fault here!?

View Comments

Welcome back to the “Life Under the Lights Bar and Grille”, your local dive bar filled with lousy food, tepid beer, bad ambiance, and great friends. Like any local Midwestern dive bar, it’s a come-as-you-are-and-sit-on-down-and-hang-with-your-buds kinda place. A conversation has broken out on the topic of “EMS Pay Sucks!! Let’s DO something about it!!” and me, your local blogger has decided to write a series of posts explaining the issues as I see them.

So, if you haven’t been here to read the last two, I suggest you go back and read them before you read this. If you don’t, well then that’s your choice. It’s a pretty informal place we have here.

Part 1: “EMS Pay Sucks!! Let’s DO something about it!!”

Part 2: “EMS Pay Sucks!! (Part 2) – Identifying the Problem

————————————————

In the last two parts here at the Life Under the Lights Bar and Grille, we’ve established that the time for talking about the issues is over, and that all EMS people need to band together in an effort to affect the pay rates in our profession. We’ve also established that this is a very complex issue and it can pretty much be said that if this was going to be easy, that it would have been done already.

If you’ve read the comments that I’ve gotten on the other posts in this series, this is a hot issue with vastly different valid arguments that have been brought forth by people I respect. While I agree with a lot of what has been said, I would like to boil the issue down a bit further than it has been brought in the comments section and in the information that I have previously been exposed to. Basically it’s like this: By examining other occupations that are well compensated for their skills, we can examine the position we find ourselves in with our profession.

I think that it works like this, Well Compensated Occupations have these things in common:

There is a medium-to-high barrier to entry – Whether by education requirements, location, or the unpleasant nature of the work, there is a barrier to entering the occupation that requires work and/or an affinity for the location or work involved to get into the field. Not everyone can do it, the people that do it but cannot do it well easily fail out, and the people that can hang around to do the work are rewarded for it. Look at Dental Hygienists, teachers, and IT professionals.
There has to be a perceived value in compensating the people in the field at a higher rate to achieve higher performance – Look at the salaries of professional athletes and CEOs. They create value intensively based upon their knowledge and talents and the better they are at doing what they do, the more value they create for their employers. Think of it, if you could raise profits in your company $5million per year, wouldn’t that be worth an extra $1million per year in payroll?
The Industry they work in turns significant revenue overall – You could be the most talented Ice Sculptor in the world, but if you couldn’t find a market to sell your ice sculptures to before they melted, you wouldn’t make any money at it. Nor would you if you were the executive chef at a greasy spoon. Sure, you’d have the same job title, “Sculptor” or “Executive Chef”, as a sculptor that worked with Marble and Gold, or an executive chef that worked at a very fancy restaurant in downtown New York… but since the places you worked for weren’t making any money, you couldn’t possibly be paid very much; Even if you were as highly educated and more talented than your counterparts at the fancy joints.

I think that overall, point number three above sets the tone for us. Our industry doesn’t make much money, therefore, no matter how caring, compassionate, qualified, or talented we are, we won’t be making much for working in it. It’s pretty much that simple. Sure, some salaries are artificially inflated due to varying degrees support from governmentally levied taxes, subscriptions, or corporate support but if we were to stand solely on our current business model, the “fee for service” model where we only get paid if we transport and most of our customers do not pay then we’d all be much poorer than we are now. In fact, most ambulance services would be out of business.

I’ve heard the argument that one form of EMS delivery or another is “Ruining it for the rest of us” with people in one camp bemoaning “the privates” for being all about profit and not paying their employees due to the money grubbing nature of their owners, and people in another camp bemoaning “The Fire Guys” for holding the profession back and keeping educational standards low so that their fire guys don’t have to get the advanced education that would be required of other well-compensated healthcare professions. People in almost every camp bemoan the volunteers saying “If they do it for free, how can we expect people to pay for us!?”

Well, while all of those arguments sound plausible enough and may hold some truth to them, they’re crap when you really look at them. Should all restaurants be Governmentally based like the Fire Departments because then pay would be equal across the board? Right now people that work in Government cafeterias earn better money than those working in Flo and Gino’s Diner down on 5^th St. Flo and Gino’s Diner is *ruining* the restaurant business, right? How about IT professionals? People that work doing advanced networking at IBM earn WAY more than the people that do networking at your local newspaper office. Does that mean that smaller operations, and not large companies are *ruining* the IT business? Waitresses that work in Casinos and at Hooters make way more than do waitresses that work at your local fancy chain restaurant… Is TGI Friday’s to blame?

Every business, governmental organization, or organization on Earth in one way or another, is a system that takes in money and other resources, does something to it, and then spits out something with perceived value to it. The military takes in vast amounts of money, manpower, and other resources and doesn’t make a dime doing it. Its value is in protecting the interests of the society that funds it and therefore it’s usually a governmental pursuit. Diamond mining takes a lot of resources and money to perform as well, but since diamonds are sold for huge profits, it’s a pursuit of the private sector. I don’t get much into politics on my blog, but I can say that personal experience has taught me that capitalism works and that government rarely does anything better, more efficiently, or faster than does the private sector. Government bodies, by definition, rarely are any good at staying within budget, let alone making a profit, and when they do try to make a profit, they fail spectacularly… e.g. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. By definition, the Fire Service doesn’t make a profit, and they have branched out into providing EMS in a lot of cases, solely to get a piece of the transport revenue to support their other operations. Private services, by definition, are doing the same… Neither one is inherently evil.

And neither are volunteers. I work in rural areas and I’ve always lived in them. Heck, my hometown had more cows than people and yet I still needed someone to bring the ambulance whenever the farm hand got trampled on by Bessy. Rural areas have voluntary agencies where community members step up to the plate to provide services out of the humanity they have to their neighbors and also because of the fact that if they didn’t do it, nobody would. That’s not evil, it’s just a reality of rural life. (There are benefits to the volunteer services that I will expound upon in a later article not in this series as well.) (Disclosure, I’m a volunteer paramedic and dang proud of it).

A paramedic blogger who I really respect, TOTWTYTR (Who writes the blog “Too Old to Work, Too Young to Retire”) offered the following comment on my post “Paramedics Providing Physicals? Decreasing Healthcare Costs and Improving Patient Care – EMS 2.0”

“Chris, you seem to be intent on finding more for paramedics to do. I’m not sure why, when there is a “shortage” of paramedics we need a heavier work load or “expanded scope”. We’re also likely intruding into someone else’s work space in the process.

Nor can I say that giving more for the same amount of money of benefit to the profession. In fact, I’d opine that it will have the opposite effect.”

His argument looks good too, when you don’t share the same definition of a business as I do and you don’t view EMS as a business, which it is. Remember my third point above, the one about industries that don’t make any revenue being unable to compensate their employees at a reasonable rate. My idea in the above post, to have a paramedic provide your next annual physical, is another service that we can use to sell for a profit. The belief that we can survive solely on transport revenue has not panned out when most of our transport revenue is based upon dwindling government reimbursement through Medicare and Medicaid (and the looming universalization of healthcare) and the tax revenues we rely on from local governments is starting to be eaten away. We have to find new sources to generate revenue from. We’ve got to compete in the marketplace to either do old things better and/or cheaper or do new things before anyone else does them. Our profession is not insulated from capitalism just because we layer ourselves in compassion.

So to end this long rant, I think that we can go a long way towards solving our pay problem by turning our attention to the three points above.

First, educational standards must be universally standardized, universally raised, and must be owned by our professional governing body. While we should probably never make a Master’s degree the entry point to ambulance work, it shouldn’t be a GED either. Probably some PE classes should be in there as well, or at least the ability to pass them. Go Get Educated!

Second, we have to educate the public about what it is that we do and why being good at it is important. If the public thinks that a volunteer service with a BLS response is adequate, then they’ve never laid there with a broken femur only to be bounced down a gravel road next to an EMT-Basic that can’t give them a squirt of Morphine. They’ve also never had their MI go into cardiogenic shock because the BLS volunteers couldn’t give them correct medications to mitigate the damage. They have to be shown convincing evidence of these facts before they will, and someone has to be our cheerleaders. Honestly, I’ve never seen an “EMS Cheerleader” or someone who was promoting the profession to the public, that hasn’t been skewered by their peers. Maybe NBC’s “Trauma” wasn’t the most accurate show in the world… but neither was “Top Gun” and we loved that movie and wanted to be a fighter pilot after seeing it (last week, again). Be an EMS Cheerleader in your community!

Third, your EMS service needs to go do something to make itself money. Figure out what you can do to boost revenue, and do it. Try new things. There are a lot of business ventures that have a good synergy with EMS.. Perhaps you could sell those little “I’ve fallen and I can’t get up” buttons and home-safety devices to the elderly in your community. Perhaps you could do home healthcare. Perhaps you could offer OSHA safety consulting to business and industry in your jurisdiction. All of these things are very much part of what we can, and probably will be doing in the future. Seek out New Ideas and Profitable Ventures!

I haven’t figured out the title to the next post in this series, but I’ll be writing it tomorrow. I’ve loved the debates that have been popping up in the comment’s section and I’m sorry that I haven’t jumped in there much as of yet. I’m just trying to keep my ideas to the main posts, and then I’ll come back and debate when I get out what I want to say. You all have been creating some great energy and while we’re not going to agree on this, I’ll say it again “Perfection is the Enemy of the Good Enough”. Complete agreement is not necessary for us to act upon a consensus.

Posted by Ckemtp on December 30, 2009 • Filed under: Administration & Leadership, EMS, EMS Health & Safety, EMS Management, EMS Topics, EMS pay sucks, EMS pep talk, Economics, Emergency Medical Services, Funding & Staffing, Paramedic, change, ckemtp rants, ems 2.0, ems salary, paramedic salary, politics, profession, salary

EMS Pay Sucks!! Part 2 – Identifying the problem

View Comments

Part 1: “EMS Pay Sucks!! Let’s DO something about it!!”

Part 2: “EMS Pay Sucks!! (Part 2) – Identifying the Problem (you’re here)

Part 3: “EMS Pay Sucks!! (Part 3) – Who or what is at fault here?

———————

The way our country compensates its EMS personnel is an abomination. It’s almost criminal, it’s inhumane, and it’s just plain wrong. Paramedics and EMTs do not deserve to live at, near, or below the poverty line simply because they chose to make a career out of helping others. We do not deserve the shame of being struggling from paycheck to paycheck. We do not deserve the hardships of trying to raise a family and continuously have to explain to them just why it is we have to work so many hours and have such little in our paychecks to show for it.

I know that EMS compensation is frankly despicable… but you don’t have to take my word for it. There is a lot written on the subject that comes from some very credible sources. Some examples:

“Five Surprising Salaries” – From Http://www.CNN.com

Favorite Quote (but the read the link to get even angrier):

“Paramedics

What they do: Paramedics respond to emergency situations and attempt to provide the necessary medical care, whether it involves transporting participants to a hospital or treating them on the scene.

Surprising salary: $27,070. Seeing as paramedics have high stress jobs that require them to be on call and ready to save lives at a moment’s notice, you might expect their mean annual salary to be higher.”

“We Don’t Pay Them Like Heroes” – By one of MY heroes, Dr. Bryan Bledsoe – This article is about 5 years old now, but it’s sadly very much still relevant. It’s from Http://www.EMSresponder.com
The US Bureau of Labor Statistics page on Paramedics – This one’s a long read, but if you’re only skimming it you should skip to the statistics on the salaries. Here’s my favorite quote from the article, under the heading of “Related Occupations”

”Other workers in occupations that require quick and level-headed reactions to life-or-death situations are:

Air traffic controllers

Fire fighters

Physician assistants

Police and detectives

Registered nurses

All those links work, by the way. Here’s a little pre-test question for you: Of those “occupations” listed above, which one is markedly the lowest paid??

I’ve been in full-time EMS for over ten years and currently work two-full time paramedic jobs. Not only do I feel the low wages, awful benefits, and long hours personally, but I also see what my coworkers go through with their lives and their families. What does one do when their calling is something so vital to the community, yet is so unappreciated financially that it hurts their families and their future?

In my travels throughout the nation I have had the chance to seek out and speak with EMS people in a lot of localities. I tend to visit odd places and I make it a point to seek out and get into conversations with interesting strangers. Luckily, all of the EMS people I know seem to fit the description of being “interesting”. I’ve heard them speak of the same problems that I’ve experienced. I’ve seen the pain and embarrassment in their eyes as they describe their love for the job and try to downplay the fact that they’re struggling financially. I’ve heard the same stories almost every time I’ve spoken with them. When they were young and new to the profession the long hours and low wages didn’t matter all that much to them… However, once they spend about five to ten years working the box they tend to experience the same struggles that I have. Spouses and Children don’t like it when the EMS person continues to work 100 hours a week to earn a paycheck that only comes close to covering the bills. They don’t like not having any disposable income. They don’t like the 24/7 demands of the job too much either. These facts rear their ugly heads when the EMS provider reaches a certain point in their life, and a career in EMS gets harder and harder to justify. Ever wonder why you don’t see many EMS professionals that have been continuously working full-time EMS for more than ten or so years? It’s for this reason. Sure there are a lot of exceptions, but I would think that the statistical clustering would bear this out. Eighteen-to-twenty year olds enter the profession, become family people around five-to-ten years later, and realize that the hours and the money they get for those hours are killing their family life… then they get other jobs, or stay in EMS and become very bitter about it.

So if I were to be asked to identify the problem using words that everyone could understand, I’d say this:

“The public is counting on the people in Emergency Medical Services to protect the lives of themselves and their loved ones. They then turn around and compensate them for this task at about the level they compensate fry cooks. They demand that there is a paramedic or EMT immediately available to them at all times to help them when the unthinkable happens, but they aren’t willing to pay them more than they do their bartender or waitress. People need advanced care immediately available to them in order to maintain the quality and presence of their lives after an emergency, and they need highly trained, experienced, and dedicated people to provide that care, but all that care seems to be worth to them is poverty-level income. What is wrong with our priorities?”

What is wrong with our priorities indeed.

I think that the above information is enough to identify that I think there is indeed a problem here. It’s an almost overwhelmingly complex problem as well. However, if it were an easy problem to fix, it would have been fixed by now. Fixing this has become mandatory for me, as it is mandatory for all of you. I’m writing this to contribute to the solutions that we’ll have to put into place, and by participating in this, you’ll be too. Over the next few days, I’ll be posting parts in this series, because I don’t think that one post will provide as many angles as I feel I need to.

One thing I do know, we’re going to act on what I put out here and on what you add to the discussion in the comments section and in your daily lives. We can no longer hope someone else will act. I ask every person who reads this to participate for our own well-being and the improvement of our profession. We’re not going to agree on everything, but “perfection is the enemy of the Good Enough”. Complete consensus is not necessary, action for our collective professional well-being is.

Coming tomorrow: EMS Pay Sucks!! Part 3 – Who or what is at fault here?

Posted by Ckemtp on December 29, 2009 • Filed under: 911 fail, Administration & Leadership, EMS, EMS Health & Safety, EMS Management, EMS Topics, EMS pay sucks, EMS rant, Economics, Emergency Medical Services, Funding & Staffing, Paramedic, change, ckemtp rants, ems 2.0, ems salary, paramedic salary, politics, salary

The Insomniac's Guide to Ambulances

Close preview

Loading...
Trauma Queen

Close preview

Loading...
Queen of the Dogs

Close preview

Loading...
Rogue Medic

Close preview

Loading...
Dani's Anatomy

Close preview

Loading...
Pedro the Paramedic

Close preview

Loading...
Medic 999

Close preview

Loading...
Paramedicine 101

Close preview

Loading...
Too Old to Work, too young to Retire

Close preview

Loading...
Life in ManchVegas

Close preview

Loading...
Not Trained, but We Try Hard!

Close preview

Loading...
Rescuing Providence

Close preview

Loading...
Pink Warm and Dry

Close preview

Loading...
The Fat Fireman Blog

Close preview

Loading...
Just Me, Just My Blog

Close preview

Loading...
That's BLS, not BS

Close preview

Loading...
Greg the HazMat Guy's Training Success

Close preview

Loading...
Conservative Firefighters

Close preview

Loading...
Street Watch - Notes of a Paramedic

Close preview

Loading...
I Just Call It As I See It

Close preview

Loading...
Run To the Curb

Close preview

Loading...
Gomerville Dot Com - This guy's awesome

Close preview

Loading...
Firefighter Net Cast

Close preview

Loading...
The um, "tactical Pants" blog

Close preview

Loading...
If you got stopped, you deserved it

Close preview

Loading...
Pepper Spray Me

Close preview

Loading...
Notes from Mosquito Hill

Close preview

Loading...
Jeramedic's Blog

Close preview

Loading...
Firefighter/Paramedic Stories

Close preview

Loading...
Red Lights, Hot Spots, and Disaster

Close preview

Loading...
Three Mouse Clicks from Disaster

Close preview

Loading...
See Jane Nurse

Close preview

Loading...
A Day in the Life of an Ambulance Driver

Close preview

Loading...
Fire Geezer

Close preview

Loading...
The Happy Medic

Close preview

Loading...

Archives for ems-2-0

Automatic Window Roller Uppers and Other “Great” Ideas

What is the next “Low Hanging Fruit” of EMS 2.0 and of US Healthcare Reform?

Paramedics and EMTs are Special, a salute to the Spork!

Should EMS Improvise? And the Recipe for the “Kaiser Cocktail”

Master Paramedics? I’m asking you a question

EMS 2.0 as Explained to My Brother

EMS Week – Introducing EMS to the Public. Spread the word

Sunday May 16th! You’re coming, Right?

A Slap in the Face for Medics? How about a Wake-up call

A Slap in the Face to Paramedics Everywhere?

Any Random Person

Negativity, you won’t find that here.

The Shine Factor

Two Cases, One letter – From one Paramedic’s struggles, change can come

The Chronicles of EMS – Day 3?? Who knows, I’m flying

Some updates LIVE from San Francisco and the Chronicles of EMS – Friday Morning

Pop! Changes the Industry… Here We Go!

Why I am Passionate about the Chronicles of EMS

Questions About EMS on a sleepy morning – Care to answer?

Are We the Gatekeepers to the Emergency Healthcare System? – EMS 2.0

Expanding Our Career Options – Non-Traditional EMS Jobs

EMS Pay Sucks!! (Part 4) – We Control the Market

Fiddling While Rome Burns – The “Ambulance Industry”

EMS Pay Sucks!! (part 3) – Who or What is at fault here!?

EMS Pay Sucks!! Part 2 – Identifying the problem

Connect with Life Under The Lights

Get your Daily Life, Under the Lights

Care to Search the Blog?

My Most Recent Posts

Comments – Recently Recieved from the Field

The EMS Blogosphere - and others

Oldies but Goodies

FireEMSBlogs.com Community

Featured from across Fire/EMS

A Letter in the File of Kenneth Montgomery…

A Spectacular Rescue in Boston…

Are you a good Medic? How do you know???…

Probe continues in Loudoun County, Virginia.…

Archives for ems-2-0

Connect with Life Under The Lights

Get your Daily Life, Under the Lights

Care to Search the Blog?

My Most Recent Posts

Comments – Recently Recieved from the Field

The EMS Blogosphere - and others

Oldies but Goodies

Tags Across FireEMSBlogs.com

FireEMSBlogs.com Community

Featured from across Fire/EMS