Skip to content

Archives for ems-ethics

See all posts in the network tagged with ems-ethics

Hypocritically Speaking – My opinions about EMS models and philosophies

15 comments

I hate when this happens.

I recently had two separate conversations with people that made me think some of my opinions may be in conflict with each other. In fact, the outcome of these conversations made me realize that I may be a tad bit of a hypocrite when it comes to some of my long held beliefs. I hate when that happens. While I freely admit I will happily change any of my opinions in response to new and/or better information, I can’t seem to change my opinion on either one of these beliefs and it’s making me feel… well… like a hypocrite.

Let’s see if you can help me out.

Opinion #1: Modern EMS exists to bring care to the patient.

That’s an important sentence up there if you didn’t realize, because it represents two monumentally different schools of thought. I believe that the primary purpose of modern EMS is to bring care to the patient, not the other way around. That statement may not sound like much, but it is hugely important for the development of our profession. In the very beginning of what evolved to be EMS, back even before the Cadillac ambulances and hearses, EMS existed to bring the patient to care. Everything was based upon that fact. From the “Flying Ambulances” invented by Napoleon’s surgeons to bring injured soldiers to the surgeons away from the battlefield to the ambulances used in the US in the 60s and 70s, most everything that existed before the advent of paramedics and EMTs existed for the purpose of bringing the patient to the care that could only be provided for them in a hospital. That’s why the Cadillac ambulances had those big engines that could drive so fast and the qualifications for being an “Ambulance Attendant” involved mostly being able to burn exceptional amounts of rubber without killing the majority of the motoring public.

The conversation that brought this up was one I had recently with a Wisconsin EMT-IV Tech (think: NREMT-I 85 level) about a community of 15,000 people nearby that I think should upgrade their EMS to the paramedic level. Their ambulance service is operated by their local fire department and runs an excess 1000 calls for service per year. They have a fairly large state college in their jurisdiction that pumps up their population during the school year and increases the diversity of their response area. I believe that they should upgrade to provide their citizens better care. She believes differently. Her thoughts were that even though there is no hospital in the town, they have three within the area that they transport to. The closest is 10 miles away from their city limits in another town and the other two are both +/- 20miles away. She believes that they don’t need to offer their citizens paramedic service because they’re so close to the hospital. (This is Wisconsin, 20 miles is a run to the corner store ‘round these parts)

I trotted out my old standby, the one I wrote about above that says that EMS is about bringing care to the patient. I explained the two schools of thought and stated that they would be saving more lives and caring for their patients better by offering paramedic care immediately at the patient’s side, rather than withholding advanced care until they had driven a minimum of ten miles. While they provide good service at their current level, I believe that paramedic ambulances in our area bring with them the majority of the care a patient would receive in an emergency room for the first hour or so of their care sans most of the lab work and x-rays. Why wait to stabilize any patient’s condition? Why let someone deteriorate when there are tools out there that can help them?

She seemed to agree with me after I explained it using the “Bring to care Vs. Care brought out” analogy and I, for lack of a better term thought that I had “won” the conversation. (I like winning things) The next week, however, I had a conversation that completely challenged my original argument and made me resort to saying “Because I like it that way” when being asked my opinion about something somewhat similar.

Opinion #2: The US model of EMS is better than the French model.

There are a few competing models of EMS in the world, but two of the starkest contrasts are the French Model of EMS and the US model. In a nutshell, the US model employs paramedics and EMTs who provide limited stabilizing care on site and remove the patient to an emergency room to be attended to by a physician for definitive treatment. The French model relies on physician triage of emergency calls and then sends either a physician to the scene or an “ambulance” with the basic capabilities of a taxi. It’s more complicated than that, and you can read more on the French system on this well-written Wikipedia entry: Emergency Medical Services in France

My thoughts are that the French Model provides too in-depth of care on scene of an incident for severe complaints. For example, while most US paramedics can diagnose and begin treatment on most STEMIs (severe heart attacks) immediately and have the patient undergoing a cardiac cath by a cardiologist in under 30-40 minutes, I challenge the French system to do similarly. I believe that putting physicians on the ambulance limits the availability of EMS care and causes rationing due to the immense costs of having a physician attend to the patient. I also think that the economy lies in having a physician present in the ER where they have the best availability of their necessary tools and the ability to treat many patients at once.  However in truth, most my belief comes from little personal experience and more from media reports of incidents like the death of Princess Diana where the doctors sat on scene for two hours trying to treat her injuries rather than bringing her to a hospital with full capabilities.

The conversation I had that made me question this is one I had about a local helicopter ambulance service that provides either a physician/nurse or physician/physician flight crew. I remarked that I didn’t know how an on-scene interface with a physician would be and that I would be worried that they would over-treat a patient that needed to be swiftly removed to a trauma center instead. Of course, I’ve never seen nor heard of an experience like that with this service, I just was airing my biases. That fact was swiftly, and correctly, pointed out to me and I resorted to the shallow argument that I simply thought that EMS was “Our place” and that other professions needed to butt out…

And I was wrong, and admitted that I was. Then we all laughed heartily.

My potential hypocrisy lies in the fact that I want to support the neighboring community to pursue the paramedic level for their service but cannot seem to extend the same argument to support physician/physician crews on the helicopter. Isn’t it the same argument?

In addition… why don’t I support the French model of providing EMS over the US model for the exact same reason? Aren’t I the guy who thinks it’s time for Primary Care Paramedics in the US?

I’d like you to poke holes in all my arguments and call me out in the comments section, but before you do that, in my pre-defense I like parts of the French system and want to adopt them here. I like that they provide physician-level triage for 911 (or 112) calls and send out appropriate resources, provide instructions for self-care, and/or direct people to primary care by alternate transport. I like that they can treat-and-release on scene for appropriate complaints. I think that they have a lot aspects of their service I like, the same things I like about the British EMS model that are provided by paramedics. I also think that Paramedics are the experts in field care. We exist for the purposes of being the masters of the acute, the experts in the expedient, and the… somethings of the… people who need immediate stabilizing care. (Hey, you try thinking up a third thing). I like the US model because I think that it provides appropriately advanced care and proper specialized focus of training while allowing for cost-effective deployment, availability, and access across the broad spectrum.

But nobody’s perfect.

Your thoughts?

Posted by on April 11, 2012 • Filed under: Emergency Medical Services, EMS, ems 2.0, EMS ethics, EMS rant, EMS Topics, Paramedic, politics

A Medic Roast in Tennessee

20 comments

Some time ago I worked for a service that had a governing board made up of community members from various walks of life. Most of them were business leaders around the area and only one or two of them had any EMS experience. One day I overheard one of the board members talking about problems he was having with the quality control at a factory his company ran in another area.

I was fascinated.

It seems that the workers at this factory just didn’t seem to care about the quality of the product they created. Products came out with grievous manufacturing errors that turned a lot of their finished products into unsellable junk. He described these errors as things that any reasonable person would notice had they spent more than one day on the job.

Joining in the conversation, I asked him “So, how much does the average worker at that factory get paid?”

He replied with a wage that was actually above my hourly rate as a paramedic. It was significantly more, actually.

It shocked him when I said “So they make that much more than I do, and when I make a mistake someone dies and my career is over? That doesn’t seem right at all”

And no, it doesn’t seem right. Every human being on this planet is going to screw something up on occasion. We’re not perfect. Medical professionals and especially EMS people are constantly challenged to adapt their knowledge to unfamiliar situations with incomplete information. On top of that, the body of our knowledge is constantly changing and it’s up to us to know exactly how to seek it out so we’re consistently doing the best for our patients. It’s not easy to be a good EMT or Paramedic and it’s a responsibility that we’re largely not well-paid for. Top that with the fact that even one simple mistake can be a career ender and…

You get this article that I saw this morning in JEMS: Tennessee Paramedic Demoted after Drug Mistake

If you’ve been a paramedic in the field for any length of time and this article doesn’t scare you, you’ve not been much of a paramedic for any length of time. This is real folks. This is something we all should sit up and take notice to.

The article concerns a paramedic who made a medication error. While it doesn’t state what error he made, it seems that he had mixed a medication in a bag of normal saline and infused it to a patient while intending to give a different medication. The article doesn’t specify the medications given but from the patient’s condition an educated person may be able to infer what they were. It also specifically does not mention the condition of the patient before or after the medication was given, leading me to believe that the patient suffered only minor ill. Yes, I know that I’m assuming… but you can’t tell me that the newspaper wouldn’t have been more than happy to blast the headline “MAN DIES AFTER MEDIC POISONS HIM WITH WRONG MEDICATION” if he had died. My guess is that if they downplayed his condition, there wasn’t much to sensationalize about it.

The medic, who had been with the service for 9 years and who had only been disciplined once in that time for missing something on a rig check, had received “above average performance reviews” and more than one commendation in his tenure.

From reading the article, it looks like an experienced medic made an honest mistake. He was reprimanded for it, suspended for 28 days, and demoted to an EMT.

Yeah, you read that right. They voided 3 years of education that this man had completed and knocked his license all the way to EMT-Basic.

They did this for one mistake. One mistake that even the medic’s chief stated was “… accidental and an oversight on his (the medic’s) part”. An honest mistake that everyone reading this article has already made or will probably make in their career. A mistake that was apparently easy to make, even by an experienced paramedic that most probably did not result in grievous harm to anyone.

If the facts truly are as reported in the article and there are no other unreported wrinkles to this case, I call shenanigans. The discipline this medic received simply does not fit the crime. It’s too heavy-handed. The discipline seems arbitrary, unnecessary, and patently unfair.

The chief was quoted in the article as saying that their agency, which is reported as responding to around 29,000 emergency calls each year, has a “success ratio” of “100%” and that “this is not the norm.”

So he’s saying that the all of the EMTs and Paramedics that must handle 29,000 emergency calls per year are expected to be 100% perfect 100% of the time or he will negate their education, harm their lifetime income potential, and defame them in the national press? I know that he probably didn’t *intend* to say that… but he very much did say it. I know of no other single profession that has so much at stake every time they go to work. To my knowledge, no other profession has so much risk of long term harm to their lives, their family, and their professional career riding on a very much unrealistic goal of being 100% perfect 100% of the time. It’s shockingly unfair… and terrifying. No human being can maintain those expectations. We’re just not able to always be perfect all of the time for an entire career.

And when you think that the pay for Paramedics and EMTs in this country is by and large pathetically low, you might wonder why anyone would ever consider doing the job at all.

I’ll say again, if the facts in this case are accurate and complete as reported, this is an outrage. It’s an abomination. It’s enough to generate national attention about the unfair working conditions and haphazard disciplinary standards that EMS must endure.

I’ll say this too: I support this paramedic and formally place a letter in the file of the agency responsible for doing this to him.

(This part is for Google) If you work for WRCB TV in Tennessee, please feel free to consider this my opinion.

(You can find the original article HERE: http://www.wrcbtv.com/story/15463233/ems-used-wrong-iv-in-melvin-davis-transport)

Posted by on September 15, 2011 • Filed under: Administration & Leadership, Command & Leadership, Emergency Medical Services, EMS, EMS ethics, EMS Health & Safety, EMS rant, EMS Topics, Ethics, News, Paramedic, patient care, Patient Management

What Does “Brotherhood” mean?

12 comments

I read an article yesterday in the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel that unfortunately, didn't surprise me all that much. It regards a professional, career firefighter who chose to opt out of his union due to his political beliefs. He's a conservative, and due to his stance on the political causes championed by the union, he's decided to take his money elsewhere and invoke a little-used "Fair Share" legal clause that allows him to drop his union membership and only pay pro-rated dues for his share of the collective bargaining. He does not pay for the union's wider political activities.

And this? Well, actually I can support it. He's voting with his feet based upon his beliefs. I respect anyone of strong conviction that truly does what they believe to be right. I like that, in fact… no matter a person's political spectrum (Well, almost no-matter their political spectrum)

I rarely talk about politics here, but this case is different. It seems this firefighter has constructed a float commemorating his brothers who died in the Sept. 11th, 2001 attacks and wants to run it in the local Racine, WI 4th of July parade.

The union thugs (Yea, I said "Union Thugs". That's what they are) have issued a fatwah barring any union firefighter from riding on or marching with the float in the parade. They won't comment further on the issue. They just don't want to support the "fair share" firefighter.

Here's the article, you should read it yourself "Firefighters' Union Throws Cold Water on 9/11 float"

As I said, I am not at all surprised by this. I'm still saddened, though. It makes me think it's time for me to pull out my favorite Paul Combs political cartoon.

Kind of says it all, doesn't it?

————————————————————

Also on another note,  did you read my last monthly JEMS column on Ambulance Service Disaster preparedness? You really should:

http://www.jems.com/article/major-incidents/ems-agency-plans-natural-disasters

 

 

Posted by on July 3, 2011 • Filed under: Administration & Leadership, ckemtp rants, Emergency Medical Services, EMS, EMS ethics, EMS Topics, Fire department, Fire Rescue Topics

Dreamland Paramedics…

8 comments

So there I was, on shift and driving around in what we call our Interceptor vehicle. It’s a marked SUV outfitted with lights and sirens that carries a full compliment of ALS gear. We use it to quick-respond to 911 calls in our own jurisdiction and to intercept BLS ambulances with a single paramedic. It’s a cool ride and I was driving it around what looked like our town when a very cool lightening storm rolled in. Then a blizzard started up, and then it was sunny when I pulled into a parking lot of… a building I didn’t recognize. I think it was another ambulance station whose members were working on a male patient who was lying unresponsive in front of their front door… I parked, got out, and walked up to them. Their uniforms were white shirts, badges, with navy-style epaulets on their shoulders. They looked nice.

This alien ambulance crew said they had the situation under control, and even though I thought this was odd… since I was in our 911 territory, I didn’t argue… I did, however go in the building to find their commanding officer, whom they had said was inside. Turns out, their ambulance station was this awesome night club complete with a stage, people dancing, and a good-looking crowd. I found the ambulance manager at the bar and asked him what was going on… He started to run away but motioned for me to follow. I ran after him, chasing him around the building, which turned out to be a huge place containing staircases, long hallways, and some epic leaps across chasms. There was even a part where we ran up a wall, Spider-Man style, where I had to grab on to steel cables and slide down them to get back to the floor. If I were really asked, I’d say the building looked… um… kind of like the Baltimore Convention Center where they hold EMS Today. I never caught up to the guy… in fact, I never went back to my vehicle because it turned out that I was actually in my old high school, I found some old friends I hadn’t seen in a while and we threw a party. We had a great time with lots of catching up, back-slappin’, laughing, and carrying-on. Then… and this is awesome, a bunch of people, a veritable parade of people I have had disagreements with over the years came walking in the room and I told them off quite eloquently. They all agreed they were wrong quite readily and invited a team of British Rugby players into the party who brought a keg of this really good beer. I had two or three glasses of the stuff. After that, I walked out of my high school and all the way to my childhood home where I could see my first cat, Katchoo, through the window as I was walking up the driveway.

And then… Doooooooo Doooooooo… this loud noise broke in to my dream from somewhere… I recognized it as a call and thought to myself… “I can’t go on a call! I’ve been drinking! Good thing I’m off-duty”.

But of course, I wasn’t off-duty. I was at work, and I woke up in my bunk-room to our dispatcher squawking about some lady somewhere with some pain in her belly. I stumbled to my clothing, still not fully realizing that I had been dreaming a minute before I was so rudely ripped from my slumber, and got dressed to groggily stumble out into the early-morning light.

I suppose at this point I should explain that this was a dream I was having while sleeping on-duty from about 2 through 3am this very shift. The dream colored the whole call for me. I must have been sleeping very soundly because while I’ve only gotten like 3 hours of sleep this shift, I feel fully rested and am writing this post at 0530 rather than attempting a triumphant return to my snug, warm bunk. I love having dreams like that… when I’m home in my own bed without the possibility of the radio waking me up. Dreams like that when I’m working tend to bleed into my reality when I’ve been ripped away from them to respond to a call. Sometimes like today, it’s no big deal other than the momentary thought that I’d made a HUGE error and quaffed some ETOH while on-duty (which I never have and never will). Other times, like when you’re having a nightmare about the Zombie Apocalypse and you get called to work a code in the middle of your epic chainsaw-intensive last-stand, the waking-from-dream thing can be detrimental. Ever had a dream about being attacked by zombie clowns and then wake up to work a code in a circus-tent? Neither have I… but it could happen.

Is this an interesting EMS post? No, not hardly. But for those of us that work our rotating 24 hour shifts and live, eat, sleep, and spend generally more than a third of our lives at work, it’s just one of the myriad things we find out about what this shift pattern and this job do to a person. Is it an occupational… hazard? I don’t know. I do know that it’s one of those odd things about working EMS that you’ll rarely find in other professions. I mean, how many times has your local hedge-fund manager had to wake up to manage some hedges and/or funds in the middle of dreaming about whatever it is they dream about?

I’d love to hear some of your stories on the same thing. I’m sure they’re out there.

Oh, and good morning everyone!

Posted by on April 25, 2011 • Filed under: Emergency Medical Services, EMS, EMS ethics, EMS Topics, Fire Rescue Topics, inside the mind of a paramedic, Paramedic, Uncategorized

Lazy EMS – Encouraging the RMA

17 comments

I had an EMT friend call me the other day with a problem she’s having at work. After listening to her and being less than helpful, I thought that I’d share this with you and see what you’d all have to say about it. I’ll give you my advice to her, but I didn’t honestly have all that good of advice to give her. Let’s see what you think.

My friend who we’ll call her “Ann” even though that may or may not be her real name, is a former partner of mine. She’s a cool girl. She’s as much of the caring, kind, and competent EMT as you’d ever want in a partner and she’s also pretty fun to work with. I liked working with her and was sad to see her move away. I was happy for her when she got this BLS 911/Transfer job on a “big city” ambulance service, but she’s had some troubles there. Now, I’ve worked with her for a year as one of my regular partners and I know she’s good at what she does. I also know that the reputations of all of the ambulance services in this “Big City” aren’t all that stellar. Frankly, I’d take her word over theirs if I was pressed to answer a about it. 

She called me and asked my opinion on what she should do about a situation that’s developing with a new partner of hers up there in the big city. She explained that this guy is a know-it-all type who encourages RMA’s (refusals, Against-Medical-Advice, etc) on almost every patient. She says that he won’t touch anything unless it’s a true emergency and tries to dissuade every patient who he feels is beneath wasting his valuable BLS time on. She says that it’s reckless and that he does it to excess, even when it’s clearly not in the patient’s best interest in her opinion. She says that he rationalizes it by saying that the patients won’t pay their bills anyway, and that some of these patients are simply being a burden on the system in general and that he’s just doing his job.

And I can understand that… to a point. I mean, who among us has ever rolled their eyes as a drama-filled patient tries to overplay their conditions to get sympathy and a transport or simply doesn’t even try and expects a free ride to three hots and a cot… I get that. In fact, I see it all the time. It bothers me to no end… and yet I rarely, if ever, encourage an RMA.

Ahhh, this is SO much better than doing a report

In fact, there are only certain times that I ever will encourage a refusal… and that is when there is a clear benefit to the patient not be transported to an ER via ambulance. I will do this at times when the patient will be better served by something like an urgent care center, or by a quick trip to their primary care doctor. I’ll show up, provide a full and detailed assessment, and actually talk to the patient about their options for medical care. I’ll tell them that maybe the stitches they need would be done faster and cheaper at the Urgent care down the street than at the ER, or that their need for a simple x-ray or throat culture could be handled somewhere else. I’ll even tell them when I think they can save money and still be safe by being transported to the ER via private car rather than by my ambulance. I feel comfortable doing that when it’s clearly in the PATIENT’S best interest – NEVER when it’s in MY best interest. Even then, if the patient still wants to go via ambulance to an ER or is unsure that my option is the best option for them I transport them without complaint. It’s just safer for my career to do that. Ultimately, I’m not a physician and I can’t make the final legal determination on what’s best. Only the patient or a physician can do that and I am usually not the patient.

However, that’s not what Ann says this new partner of hers is doing. She says that he tries to defer every transport on the grounds that he’s lazy and then he writes very sloppy reports about the calls he refuses. She says that he’s been in trouble for this before and that while he was working at another service, he was actually almost terminated for this behavior.

I know the type of EMT he is… He’s the “So, do you want to be transported or what?” kind of EMT. The kind of EMS person who feels that he or she doesn’t ever respond to “Check someone out” and that only the patients that absolutely have to be transported to an ER for an “awesome” enough medical complaint are truly worth their time.

I hate those kinds of EMTs.

She is concerned for her job, her license, and her career while she works with this guy. She doesn’t want his bad behavior to get her roped into a complaint, lawsuit, or worse… she wanted to know if there was a way she could protect herself legally from his actions while she was working with him.

I went with my stock answer on this. Being an EMS supervisor myself, I asked her if she’d talked to her superiors about this. She said she had done just that, and it hadn’t gotten anywhere.

I wasn’t surprised.

Unfortunately for my friend, there’s just no reasoning with this kind of EMT. I’ve worked with their kind before and I know how painful one’s working relationship with these people can get when you force them to *gasp* do their jobs and take people places while treating them for whatever they say their medical complaint is. They tend to get growly at you when you tell them you’re having trouble hearing them over the sound of you not caring what they think. It makes lunch time a tenuous situation and totally ruins the Christmas party.

My next pearl of advice to her was to tell her to actually send a written letter to her supervisors, detailing her complaints and stating her concerns in writing. My thoughts would be that then, there would be a paper trail that shows she at least tried to do something about it. Unfortunately, I also had to warn her that it may end up branding her as a trouble-maker when the bosses realize that they now have a paper trail too, only they actually have to do something about it. They may retaliate against her instead.

Then I told her to CC a copy of the letter to the medical director, just for emphasis. It’s because I’m a devious trouble-maker myself.

Situations like this are all too common out there and they are the things that hold our profession back. Yes, I know that there are system abusers out there in patientville. We’re not going to fix that with our current system and really need to get more options out there for appropriate treatment pathways. However, putting people at risk by encouraging RMAs because you’re a lazy provider hurts our efforts by setting a bad precedent. Please don’t do this people. Take it from me. I’d never let you get away with it on my shift.

Does anyone else have any better advice for my friend Ann?

——————————————————————–

Also, it may be helpful to read this post: a primer on the people I call “Grumblemedics”

Posted by on January 30, 2011 • Filed under: Administration & Leadership, Command & Leadership, Emergency Medical Services, EMS, EMS ethics, EMS Management, EMS Topics, EMT, everyday ems ethics, grumblemedics, medical ethics

A Late-Night Rant about Petty Politics in EMS

16 comments

I had to think about a Facebook comment that I just posted on my personal Facebook page. Admittedly, I’m pretty angry right now and I probably shouldn’t be writing. It’s been a long night, you see… and I’ve had it up to my eyeballs with what I’m angry at.

However, this blog is my therapy and I can use it to get some stuff off of my chest whenever I see fit, right? Good, then here goes.

Tonight I’m going to forget that my computer has been acting up on me and has lost two 1000word-plus articles that I was lining up for the end of the week. I’m not even going to mention that I’m behind on a lot of projects because I’ve been overwhelmed with work. I’m not even going to talk about how the workload that I’ve let pile up has been making the blog suffer… Nope. I’m going to jump to the front of the line and bring that Facebook comment right here, to the front of this blog page where a few thousand EMTs and Medics might read it this month.

“Revenue Preservation, Area Preservation, Ego Preservation, and Political Capital Preservation” – These things are the top priorities of some EMS agencies I’ve dealt with over the years. Patient care is on the list, but its way down on the bottom of these agencies’ priorities. Some agencies have their priorities straight, but more it’s more common than I’d like to admit that EMS agencies have those four things at the beginning of this paragraph firmly implanted into their unwritten mission statements.  

I’ve written at length about EMS politics and how I hate them. For example:

-          Is What You Do “The Best You Can Do”

-          Volunteer Fire/EMS – Taking the High Road and Letting Go

-          Two Cases, One Letter: From One Paramedic’s Struggles, Change Can Come

-          Cat Puke Chicken

-          EMS 2.0, Bernoulli, Fluid Dynamics, and Changing the World

-          And Much, Much more…

And tonight, again, I’ve seen yet another example of the worst kind of EMS politics. I’ve seen these situations countless times before and I’ll see them countless times again, I’m afraid. People who don’t put the patient first have missed the whole point to this EMS thing. We’re here for the patient. We’re here for the citizens. There is a selfless aspect to EMS that must be respected in the preservation of the greater good. To miss that for almost any reason is to disrespect not only the foundation that EMS was built upon, but also the foundation of the entire healthcare system.

“First, Do No Harm”

Yea, that’s the first pledge of the Hippocratic Oath, the same one that Physicians take when they become doctors. EMS people are an off-shoot of physicians and we should follow those four words up there as much as they have to. Using the citizens of your jurisdiction as pawns in a political game is to violate those most sacred of oaths. EMS people tend to feud for the flimsiest of forgettable reasons. These feuds escalate unchecked for years until every action taking by the opposing party seems only to reinforce the perceived validity of the petty feud, even when the original actions or inactions that caused the feud were lost to history or died with the people who started the feud to begin with. Often, neighboring squads hate each other for no reason that they can remember. Factions within a single EMS agency may feud internally for no good reason whatsoever. These things escalate and escalate until patients are harmed by them… for no reason at all.

And if there ever has been a reason to harm a patient for a petty feud between services, between cliques, or between individuals, I’ve yet to hear it. In my opinion, using a patient as a pawn in a political game is the worst kind of offense.

These petty EMS politics, these laughable feuds, and the little kingdoms must have the light shown upon them. As I said in my probably politically incorrect Facebook post:

“I don’t like it when Petty People play petty politics with peoples’ lives. Really, people die from the kind of stuff I’m angry at without ever knowing that they were pawns in a political game. EMS politics must be exposed to the light so that the people that play them can be scattered like the cockroaches they are.”

Do you see anything that I’m going to be in trouble for tomorrow when people read that post? Remember, that’s on my personal account… not the blog account. Yes, I do take personal responsibility for everything I say on this blog page or in any of my public speaking or writing for that matter, but there’s a chance that people I know and may or may not have been talking about will read that tomorrow. My guess is that I will be the bad guy for saying it.

And frankly, I don’t care.

As I said in the post that I linked to above, Volunteer Fire/EMS – Taking the High Road and Letting Go – I am willing to bury each and every hatchet I do now hold or have ever held and solemnly pledge to conduct myself in friendship, mutual understanding, and for the good of the ideals in which we all should share. My guess is that there are people out there tonight who should do exactly the same. Don’t let petty politics harm those whom we’re pledged to serve. It’s not about us. It’s about them. It’s about our ideals.
It’s bigger than us. We are more than the sum of our parts. Don’t forget that.

I know that this hasn’t been the most polished piece I’ve ever posted up here, but everything I’ve said I believe. That’s why I’m a blogger. It’s why I’m a paramedic as well. Thanks for letting me rant.

The EMT Oath as adopted by the NAMET

EMTs have an Oath as well...

Posted by on October 27, 2010 • Filed under: Administration & Leadership, change, ckemtp rants, Command & Leadership, edemse, Emergency Medical Services, emotions, EMS, EMS ethics, EMS Management, EMS rant, EMS Topics, Ethics, everyday ems ethics, Fire Rescue Topics, medical ethics, Paramedic, politics, professionalism, rant, Uncategorized

EMS case law? AMA Refusals, Death, and Documentation

18 comments

Our friend Valerie DeFrance, who runs the EMS House of Defrance from way up in the Vast Frozen Wasteland facebooked this article this morning and you need to read it.

http://www.leagle.com/unsecure/page.htm?shortname=inmoco20100921246

Yep, check that URL. It’s from a site that specializes in putting out snippets of case law and this one’s simply all-too-common.

You should read the article, or at least skim through the salient points, because this affects you personally. You as an EMS provider should know about this. Pay attention to this case and what it means to you.

In this case, a Paramedic/EMT-B ambulance responded to a person experiencing Chest Pain and Difficulty Breathing. This is a quote from the article: (The emphasis is mine)

The unit arrived at decedent’s home and Respondents performed a primary survey of the decedent ten minutes after the initial call was placed. Respondents followed up on their primary survey with a secondary survey a minute later. They then obtained a set of vital signs. Based on their examination, Respondents diagnosed decedent with acid reflux and recommended a treatment of over-the-counter Maalox/Gaviscon. Believing decedent was in no immediate medical danger, Respondents left the home fifteen minutes after arriving.

The next morning at approximately 10:30 a.m. decedent again called 9-1-1, still complaining of difficulty breathing and chest pains. An ambulance unit from Community Fire Protection District was again dispatched to decedent’s home arriving five minutes later. This unit was manned by a different two-person team than had responded the night before. After finding the decedent was experiencing pain across the chest and into the back, shortness of breath, diaphoresis and nausea, the team began administering emergency treatment with oxygen, aspirin and EKG. At 10:55 a.m. the team initiated emergency transport of decedent to DePaul Health Center where he was admitted ten minutes later. At the Health Center decedent was diagnosed with cardiac arrest and pulmonary embolism and began receiving treatment. The treatment was unsuccessful and decedent died at 4:00 p.m. on 11 July 2008.

So do you see a problem there?

First off, I’m assuming they obtained an AMA refusal form (and if they didn’t, they’re idiots). This case highlights exactly what I’ve always said about refusals being worthless. There’s no mention of the patient having refused transport here. In fact, this isn’t a case on whether or not the EMTs actions were correct or incorrect. This is simply a case to see whether or not they have protection under the doctrine of Sovereign Immunity. It looks to me like they were basing their defense on whether or not they have that legal protection, not basing it on their thought that they provided proper care. It looks like they were assumed not to have provided it. In this case, a signed refusal meant nothing. If they were successfully sued with no mention of the AMA form, what good is it?

Second off, it’s in the official record that their PRIMARY survey took less than a minute… and I can believe that if they were solely attempting to rule out an immediate life threat. That’s what the primary survey is for. As evidenced by the fact that the deceased lasted another ten hours, I can assume that there was no immediate threat to his life. However, they then did a “secondary survey” one minute later and cleared the scene with what I assume to be an AMA refusal in just fifteen minutes. So if we time this out, they made it to the patient’s side in one minute, did two assessments, obtained a refusal, and cleared the scene in 15 minutes? That’s one minute to grab gear and walk to the patient, a minute to rule out immediate life threats, a few minutes to do a secondary assessment and vitals, with no mention of an EKG, and a few minutes to carry whatever gear they took in back to the truck, get back in the truck, and clear? Um… Either these are the fastest medics in the West, or they did a very poor assessment.

And the guy died. And they got sued. And they lost. And they freaking deserved to lose.

The second crew seems to have provided proper care for the patient, and that is evidenced in the case outcome. In fact, the lawyers and the judge seem to have made it a point to show the poor care provided by the first crew in contrast to the proper care provided by the second crew. It’s clearly evident here and I’ll bet that if we were to go to that agency and inspect it, we could probably see the difference in dedication and motivation between the first and second crew. The first paramedic comes off as lazy, callous, and stupid whereas the second paramedic comes off as competent and caring. I’d be willing to bet that this is honestly the case. That the first medic was a “good enough” medic who often encouraged AMA refusals and performed just to the bare minimum and the second medic was somewhat better than the first.

So how, as EMS providers, how do we protect against the precedent set by this case law?

The answer is still now as it always has been, do a thorough assessment every time, kick the decisions up to the physician, and document, document, document. This case was in 2008 and if you were doing EMS back then, you know that a 12-lead EKG was the standard of care. This patient should have had a working diagnosis (Chest pain), attempts at making a differential diagnosis (lung sounds, History and Physical Exam, EKG, SpO2, and trended vital signs and 12-leads) and should have been transported. If the patient wanted to refuse, the physician medical control should have been contacted and this should have been documented. The time limit of 14 minutes of assessment and/or care in this case is evidence that this didn’t happen. The medics blew his call for help off and the patient died.

Here’s what I would have done: I would have performed a thorough patient assessment including lung sounds, ABD assessment, and a history. I would have gotten the OPQRST of the patient’s complaint, and performed serial 12-lead EKGs. Then I would have transported. If the patient refused, I would have transmitted the 12-lead EKG, spoken with a physician about the case, and attempted to have the physician speak with the patient. This all would have been thoroughly documented.

Patients have the right to refuse care if they are conscious, alert, and oriented. They have this right even if they’re being stupid. We have the responsibility to help them make a proper, rational decision and to show that we made every effort to provide them with the best possible information. Proper patient care and excellent documentation are the way we protect against these types of lawsuits… and that really hasn’t changed.

This kind of situation can and does happen. Protect yourself and your agency by never becoming lazy. Document! Document! Document! Do your best every time. Be thorough and don’t succumb to mediocrity just because it’s easy. It will catch up to you just like it did to these two.

————————————————————

For more tips on EMS documentation:

Posted by on September 27, 2010 • Filed under: Administration & Leadership, Case law, Command & Leadership, Emergency Medical Services, EMS, EMS ethics, EMS Management, ems narrative, EMS narrative report, ems patient care report, ems report, EMS Topics, EMS training, Management, narrative, narrative report, Paramedic, paramedic education, Patient Management, scenario, scenario based training, Training & Development

A Weighted Issue – The Fire Service Helping Private EMS

111 comments

There has been quite a bit of buzz lately over a story that happened pretty close to my generic neck of the woods. It’s been featured on www.JEMS.com as well as www.EMS1.com and has blown up the twitter streams. I was made aware of it by the JEMS Facebook fan page posting the link two days ago.

Before I link to the article, I’d like to say that I was immediately on the side of the private ambulance company and I jumped right on the JEMS facebook comments thread to state my case. I figured that there would be some dissention, but that most people would share my view.

But that’s not exactly what happened…

Apparently there is a vast chasm in opinions out there on this issue, and it’s not just the Firefighters vs. the non-firefighters like I thought it would be. The comments section is up to 61 comments as I write this and the discussion is poignant and well reasoned. I still believe in what I said… but I’m willing to revisit the issue

Here’s the article: http://www.jems.com/article/news/illinois-fire-department-refus

So… do you see the discord there?

The private ambulance service, which is a pretty new company that runs only one or two ambulances was started by a paramedic with a dream (yea, really). It took the patient from a rehab hospital to a private residence in Springfield, IL. I don’t know the exact road mileage, but I do know that Springfield, IL is a good 4 to 5 hours away from where the rehabilitation hospital is located. The patient was reported to have been on Medicare and Medicaid and weighed approximately 700lbs.

Yep, this ambulance crew had to take a 700 pound patient on a long distance transfer. I feel their pain.

The crew couldn’t get the patient from their ambulance into the residence when they got there and called the Springfield FD (SFD) for assistance moving the patient. SFD refused to assist them.

Ultimately, the private ambulance crew arranged for another private ambulance from a Springfield area company to come and help them. The job got done and everyone was happy, right?

Well, no… of course that’s not what happened. Someone alerted the media and the story popped up on the wire. Now there’s debate flying all over the interwebs and I for one want to keep it going. Viva debate. Viva discussion.

Here’s my comment from the JEMS Facebook Page:alled “community service” which I guess is something they don’t understand in Springfield.

There is nothing wrong with private ambulances and even the staunchest fire service EMS person would agree that no fire department would accept a long distance transfer (in this case, probably a good 5hrs) discharging a Pt from a rehab hospital to home. Some service has to exist to do this type of work, and Mercy Ambulance stepped up to do it. The patient was a TAXPAYING CITIZEN of Springfield FD’s area and Mercy was returning that taxpaying citizen to his or her home. This person has already paid for Springfield FD’s services and they refused to provide them.

I would guess that SFD regularly responds to other so-called “Nusaince calls” all the time, or have they stopped responding to Activated Fire Alarms, dumpster fires, and CO alarms as well?

Mercy Ambulance wasn’t doing this for the money. The reimbursement from Medicare is laughable and the “reimbursement” from IL medicaid is pretty much non-existant. They did this because the patient needed to get home. The reimbursement system is such that they would have had to eat the cost of additional crew and making the assumption that the SFD would respond for the “Public Assist” of one of it’s tax-paying constituents is reasonable.

SFD gets a letter in the file for this one.

I’m actually familiar with the ambulance service in question. In the area that it mainly operates within, the Fire service is always happy to help out the private ambulances with these types of cases. It has to do with providing something called “community service” which I guess is something they don’t understand in Springfield.

There is nothing wrong with private ambulances and even the staunchest fire service EMS person would agree that no fire department would accept a long distance transfer (in this case, probably a good 5hrs) discharging a Pt from a rehab hospital to home. Some service has to exist to do this type of work, and Mercy Ambulance stepped up to do it. The patient was a TAXPAYING CITIZEN of Springfield FD’s area and Mercy was returning that taxpaying citizen to his or her home. This person has already paid for Springfield FD’s services and they refused to provide them.

I would guess that SFD regularly responds to other so-called “Nusaince calls” all the time, or have they stopped responding to Activated Fire Alarms, dumpster fires, and CO alarms as well?

Mercy Ambulance wasn’t doing this for the money. The reimbursement from Medicare is laughable and the “reimbursement” from IL medicaid is pretty much non-existant. They did this because the patient needed to get home. The reimbursement system is such that they would have had to eat the cost of additional crew and making the assumption that the SFD would respond for the “Public Assist” of one of its tax-paying constituents is reasonable.

SFD gets a letter in the file for this one

That has been “liked” six times since I wrote it.

The rub here for the Defenders of the Fire Service™ is that they say that the “Medical Transportation Industry” is an “Industry” and therefore should have their own plans in place to deal with this type of case. They say that they shouldn’t diminish their ability to respond to emergency requests in order to help out a private business with a client. They say that they would expose themselves to liability, expose themselves to potential injuries of their employees, and that they would be providing this service for free. They say that this isn’t their job and that they shouldn’t be spending taxpayer dollars to help out a private entity.

And… I might concede that to them if I thought it was genuine. I mean, does the fire service help out the towing and recovery industry with cleaning up car wrecks? Do they help out the private fire alarm business by responding to and resetting false alarms? Do they provide private residences with smoke and carbon monoxide alarms?

Yes, of course they do all that. They do other things too. They help out all kinds of community entities, both public and private, for-profit and not-for-profit all the time. The Defenders of the Fire Service™ keep trumpeting their statement that they are an “All-Hazards” emergency response agency that is constantly adapting to meet “the needs that the public are demanding from them”.

All of those community entities the fire service assists have one thing in common, they pay taxes. Some of them pay property taxes, some of them pay rent that goes in-part to pay property taxes, and some of the straight not-for-profits provide services that help the people paying property taxes.

And last time I checked, the SFD does receive property taxes.

Here’s one thing with what I said though… The “All-Hazards response” idea is for responding to “hazards” and I can see where a private ambulance needing a hand isn’t exactly a hazard or an emergent need.

Would any of the Fire Departments I’ve worked on have done it? Yes, absolutely. A citizen needed an assist and we would have marked it as a “Public Assist”. We would have responded non-emergent, helped, and it would have been a non-issue. The person pays tax dollars and we would have looked at it as the same as responding with an engine for a 911 lift assist.

However, I will concede that the Private ambulance service would have been more proactive if they would have called the SFD and asked them if they would help them before they loaded the patient. If the SFD told them “no” at that time, they could have arranged for alternate methods at that time. Instead, they just assumed. They transported the patient to someone else’s sandbox and just hoped that they would play nicely.

And the SFD doesn’t play the way that Mercy Ambulance is used to playing.

If you can’t tell, I’m on the side of Mercy Ambulance here. Although I say that they should have dropped the dime and rang the SFD to ask them before they just assumed they’d help.

One thing’s for sure though, this issue isn’t going away and it will probably become more common. There’s a ton of differing opinions out there as shown by the comments that news story received and it shows that there are EMS professionals on both sides of the fence that have strong and reasoned opinions. This is an issue that would benefit from some discourse and that’s why I’m bringing it up.

What are your thoughts?

Posted by on September 17, 2010 • Filed under: Administration & Leadership, ckemtp, ckemtp rants, edemse, Emergency Medical Services, EMS, EMS ethics, EMS Health & Safety, EMS Topics, Fire department, Fire Rescue Topics, Firefighter Safety & Health, News, Paramedic, Patient Management, politics

Too Much Information For a Paramedic?

19 comments

 

This is a coordinated post by our friends Greg Friese and Steve Whitehead.

 - Greg’s post on this topic can be found at: http://www.everydayemstips.com/?p=3628

 - Steve’s post on this topic can be found at: http://theemtspot.com/2010/08/25/too-much-information/

 ————————————————————————-

“They Don’t Know What They Don’t Know”

It’s an established fact that 60% of fatalities within confined spaces are would-be rescuers. They see someone down in a confined space, enter the space, and are overcome by the conditions that took down the initial victim. The process sometimes repeats itself, with multiple would-be rescuers entering the space and falling victim themselves. It’s tragic really, but the cold, hard fact is that these people are victims of their own ignorance. They don’t know what they don’t know. They don’t know that there is a fatal set of conditions within the space, and they don’t know that whatever it is that killed the first victim, or subsequent victims, will kill them as well. It’s a well documented phenomenon that plays on the compassion of the would-be rescuers and ends up getting them killed.

They simply don’t know what they don’t know.

Hey Guys?? Guys?

So when I was approached by our friend Greg Friese from www.EveryDayEMStips.com the other day regarding a comment he received on one of his training articles, I was interested in doing a co-post with him. He also has contacted our friend Steve Whitehead from www.TheEMTspot.com and together we’re tri-posting on this issue. Their links will follow below and are just great as always.

The comment that followed this online training article was written presumably by a paramedic. It was a critique of the article that simply stated “too much information for a paramedic”. I read that, and immediately thought of confined space incidents, where ignorance can get a person killed. Lots of situations fit that scenario and it’s not always the rescuers who get killed. EMS providers who “don’t know what they don’t know” can and do kill patients. More often, they don’t provide the best possible care.

There’s this thing that we have made it our business to know how to repair. It’s called the “Human Body” and if you’re reading this article, the chances are good that you possess one. The human body is VASTLY complex. It’s the most complex machine we humans know about and we are still learning about it to this day. There are some amazingly smart people out there who have dedicated their lives to studying these meat machines that our brains pilot around and they still haven’t figured everything out yet. We can help set it back on course to heal itself in a lot of cases but we can’t construct a new one. We don’t know about all the minutia, the microscopic works inside of it that make it do all of the amazing things that it does. The levels of systems within systems that function seamlessly within still other systems are numerous and fascinating. I learn something new about it all the time, and still there are people who know vast amounts more about the inner workings of it and about the huge number of things that can affect it’s operating effectiveness than I do. The human body is remarkably complex yet elegant and perfect in its design.

C'mon... Don't be a wuss.

And we who call ourselves “medical professionals” are well advised to study every possible aspect of it. Consider it your “life’s work”. If your job is to fix and support the end users of the human body, you darn well better know everything you can about it.

“But”, you say, “There are people out there who are supposed to know much more about the human body than we are. They’re called Physicians, and they get paid a whole lot more than we do. We’re just paramedics. (or EMTs).” And you’d be right for saying that, of course. Physicians have the ultimate responsibility for knowing the human body. It’s their life’s work as well. Their patients live and die based upon their knowledge, skills, and talents they have for examining the human body and being able to figure out what’s going on. Their whole practice is based upon their knowledge, skill, and talent. The more they know when they’re working there, the better provider they are.

It’s that simple, and it’s exactly the same for us EMS people. The more we know, the better we are. Nobody is better served by dumbing us down. Nothing is gained by denying yourself knowledge. Not a single patient is better served by you not knowing everything you can know about what is going wrong with them and it’s your duty to learn as much as you can about what you’re supposed to know about.

What is the line for how much paramedics “need to know?” Is everything that we need to know covered by our initial training course? Is that everything we need to get out there in the world and start slinging IVs and Meds all willy nilly?

I look at the paramedic license as a “learner’s permit”. It’s the baseline knowledge level needed to function at that level under supervision. It’s a jumping off point from which the provider should immerse themselves in knowledge. I can certainly say that I’ve learned volumes past my initial certification and that the “extra” knowledge has saved lives. Did you know that Fentanyl can cause chest muscle tetany when administered too rapidly? Or how about that lasix, when pushed too rapidly can cause hearing loss?  Do you know that ST depression in the high V leads can signify a posterior MI? What about differentiating an acetabulum fracture from a “pulled groin”? Can you reliably predict the patients whose blood pressure is going to crash after Nitroglycerine administration by reading a 12-lead EKG? What about the clinical presentation of a non-ST elevation MI? Do you know the MEND stroke screen? What about the different neurological exams to find an intracranial bleed?

Etcetera, etcetera… The point is, there isn’t a cut off. The final exam we take for our licensures prepares us with the baseline knowledge to get out there and learn what it takes to make us truly great EMS providers. The true professional will learn this, and constantly seek the knowledge he or she needs. The average to sub-average provider will comment that they “don’t need to know” something.

Get out there, get fascinated, and learn as much as you can. It will never be enough knowledge… but your mind is a sponge for a reason.

Study Hard. Know Your Stuff. No Excuses.

————————————————

This is a coordinated post by our friends Greg Friese and Steve Whitehead. Be sure to read their posts on this

Greg’s post on this topic can be found at: http://www.everydayemstips.com/?p=3628

Steve’s post on this topic can be found at: http://theemtspot.com/2010/08/25/too-much-information/

Posted by on August 24, 2010 • Filed under: change, Emergency Medical Services, EMS, ems education, EMS ethics, EMS Motivation, EMS practice, EMS rant, EMS Topics, EMS training, Paramedic, paramedic education, Patient Management, Training & Development, training-fire-rescue-topics, Uncategorized

EMS: Is what you do the Best You Can Do?

11 comments

Not too long ago I was reading an article in Entrepreneur Magazine when I came across an article speaking on negotiating tactics. I wish I could find it, but unfortunately it was long enough ago that I’ve disposed of the printed issue (I subscribe) and cannot find it on the web. It was a good article and it taught me some words that I’ve since used quite a bit in my own life:

“Is that the best you can do?”

From the time our parent’s first put us out there in the world most of us have probably been told to “Do our Best” when we try to do something. No matter if we win or lose, we’ve been told that it’s ok as long as we “do the best we can” while trying. We seem to feel better at the outcome of almost anything if we feel that we’ve “Given our best shot” when we try to accomplish what we’ve set out to do. We all like to do our “best” and we hope that our “best” will be good enough.

This begs the question… is what you’re doing today in EMS “the best you can do?” Career wise, operationally, with your service’s treatments, with your own personal training and education, and with your own attitude… is this really “the best you can do?”

I would like to think that I “try my best” in my own EMS career and paramedic practice. I would also like to think that I work for an EMS organization that is trying to do the best it can for its people and its collective patients. However, there are quite a few situations where I have felt that I have not done or have been prevented from doing my best for a number of reasons. Some are reasonable and others are not. I’d think that all of us would give the answer that we always want to provide every patient with our “best” possible care. However, I’d also guess that everyone reading this can think back to any number of situations where they feel that they didn’t give it. Sometimes this reason comes down to the skill set of the individual provider. This could be a situation where the provider didn’t have the best possible information or knowledge available to them. They may have provided an ineffective or even harmful treatment modality or might have failed to act upon a missed assessment finding, such as by giving a medication for which a patient has a documented allergy because the provider didn’t know or simply forgot that the patient had the allergy. Sometimes the actions of others in the organization can prevent a provider from rendering the best possible care. This could be by failing to check, clean, or restock a needed piece of equipment or by providing inadequate care prior to a provider assuming patient care such as in the case of a first-responder crew failing to place a patient in full c-spine precautions when indicated prior to moving a patient to the transporting ambulance and the transporting EMT not having enough manpower to safely immobilize the patient. Sometimes the organization can hinder an EMS provider from doing his or her best by doing things such as providing inadequate equipment or medical protocols, or by mandating that a provider regularly work past exhaustion-level hours.

People inherently want to do well at whatever they choose to do for their careers as well as at other tasks where they feel strongly about the outcome. I may have accepted that I’ll never be as good of a basketball player as Michael Jordan, nor the same-level of cartoonist as Scott Adams, nor the best noodler in the world… but I’m certainly going to try to be the best paramedic I can be.

THIS guy, however, may be The Best Noodler In the World

Sometimes our own personal biases prevent us from doing the best we can do and for this I’m not talking about bias regarding any protected classes or topic, rather I’m talking about our own version of the status quo. A personal example of this would be my ALS Quick Response Vehicle at work. We went a solid week without having the proper forms available for the daily equipment checks and I didn’t have the computer access to print more off. During that week, I got in the habit of not using the forms and simply checked the truck based upon my knowledge of what was supposed to be in there and what was supposed to be checked. The way it played out, I ended up continuing to not use the check sheets when checking the vehicle, even though the forms had been replenished. A few weeks later, someone found that there was equipment missing in the vehicle that had gone unnoticed for some time. At that point, I realized that I had developed my own bias against using the forms for a reason that is even unbeknownst to me. I had gotten in the rhythm of not using the forms, and that caused me to miss that the infrequently-used piece of equipment was missing. I had developed a personal mental bias that prevented me from “doing my best” and thoroughly checking the truck.

Another preventer of best practices can be organizational politics, both internal and external. As a paramedic who regularly responds to other ambulance services to provide “ALS Intercepts”, I have observed that the politics between the services we work with can affect patient care for both the negative and the positive. While I am not saying that any of these arrangements result in inadequate patient care, I can say that the services with whom I interface most frequently and most pleasantly get a better provider out of me than do the services with whom my relations are less frequent or are strained due to political turmoil. When I respond to a request for an ALS intercept, I am being called to the “house” of another group of providers. While I am the highest level of care on the scene, I’m also a guest in their house. They have their own internal biases and I have mine. Sometimes the synergy in our working relationship can be strained, which results in a palpable difference in the flow of the scene and the teamwork exhibited at it. While I will ensure that I “do my best”, it’s easier to do it when I work well with the team I’m working with.

So how do we change things? We’re all human and we all have things that prevent our “best shot” from being the only thing that we “give it” in our EMS careers. This may be consciously, as in the case of internal politics; Subconsciously, as in the case of my not using the check sheet; or Involuntary, as in our service not providing us with needed equipment or our coworkers failing to replace an item in the ambulance that we did not have an opportunity to check. As in most things, the easiest thing for us to change is ourselves. Changing ourselves is a great place to start and will make serving as an example to others your main tool to use to try and get the best out of them.

Most situations can be made better and almost all of us can try harder. The secret is to attempt to do our “best” at all times and to try and ingrain our own best practices into our daily routines. This can be as simple as always trying to check the truck in the most thorough way possible or by making sure that you always check and recheck things to ensure that they’re done right. It helps to continuously seek out and recognize one’s own personal biases, (remember my check sheet?) to make sure that our own preferences and routines aren’t leading to suboptimal performance. Consistently ask yourself if what you’re doing is the “best you can do” and then ask yourself what you can do to make it your best. Mentally prepare yourself for your shifts with adequate rest when possible, manage your stress level so you can keep your thoughts focused on your care, and train hard. Ingrain your best efforts into the systematic way you do things and make your best way your normal way of doing things. We can’t change everyone around us in an instant, but our quiet positive efforts can pay large dividends in how people around us think, feel, and act. Our best may in turn get the best out of our partner, which may in turn get the best out of the next crew, and so forth. Soon enough… deciding to give our best may change your organization, our industry, or our profession.

And I assure you, doing your best will indeed make the difference in someone’s life. It’s just what we do, Folks.

“Is that the best you can do??

————————————————

For more on doing your best in EMS and in getting the best out of your EMS people read:  “The Shine Factor”

Posted by on August 19, 2010 • Filed under: Administration & Leadership, ALS Intercept, Ambulance cleaning, Command & Leadership, edemse, Emergency Medical Services, EMS, EMS ethics, EMS Topics, EMS training, Fire Rescue Topics, Firefighter, Management, Paramedic, Patient Management, politics, pride, profession, professionalism, Training & Development, training-fire-rescue-topics, Uncategorized

Thanks Rogue Medic – What are EMS’s “Fad Diagnoses”?

13 comments

Our friend Rogue Medic has a shiny new site up there on the Interwebs. It rocks. Rogue Medic is one of the many, many bloggers, non-bloggers, and/or random people who are much, much smarter than I am. I read his site a lot and I am very pleased to throw a link to his new site. He’s part of a new blog network with the URL Http://www.EMSblogs.com. Rogue has been joined by our other friends David Konig and Too Old To Work, Too Young to Retire.

That URL again for Rogue Medic is: Http://www.RogueMedic.com

Too Old to Work’s new digs are at: Http://www.ToOldToWork.com (yes, I know the “To” should be a “Too” and it just bugs the hell out of me as well)

And you can find everyone on their network on Http://www.EMSblogs.com 

Anyways, since this is my blog and you’ll come back here eventually. Rogue Medic pointed me to a site that I’m quite surprised I hadn’t found before Http://www.QuackWatch.com It’s provided me with some hours of entertainment tonight and since I’m a nerd and I admit it, that’s ok for me.

On QuackWatch, I read an interesting article on “Fad Diagnoses” with a handy checklist at the end that tells one how to create a bona-fide fad disease. (The article is here, with a lot of handy links: http://www.quackwatch.com/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/fadindex.html)

 The checklist, which is just entertaining as hell, is below:

 Recipe for a New Fad Disease

  • Pick any symptoms—the more common the better.
  • Pick any disease—real or invented. (Real diseases have more potential for confusion because their existence can’t be denied.)
  • Assign lots of symptoms to the disease.
  • Say that millions of undiagnosed people suffer from it.
  • Pick a few treatments. Including supplements will enable health food stores and chiropractors to get in on the action.
  • Promote your theories through books and talk shows.
  • Don’t compete with other fad diseases. Say that yours predisposes people to the rest or vice versa.
  • Claim that the medical establishment, the drug companies, and the chemical industry are against you.
  • State that the medical profession is afraid of your competition or trying to protect its turf.
  • If challenged to prove your claims, say that you lack the money for research, that you are too busy getting sick people well, and that your clinical results speak for themselves.

 

This checklist got me to thinking about what “fad diseases” we may be treating as Paramedics and EMTs in the prehospital setting. While logically, I can think that we must be treating diagnoses that are more en-vogue than others, I can’t really seem to think of one off hand. I blame it on a mixture of my long day and my ADD. I would guess that our contemporary collective attention to STEMI care could be one. While ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction’s are quite serious and require immediate intervention, haven’t you noticed that we never call anything a “heart attack” anymore and now everything’s a STEMI? Do we emphasize the diagnosis of the STEMI at the expense of other conditions, such as Thoracic Aneurism or a Pulmonary Embolism? What about non-STEMIs?

Since I’m drawing a blank on something where I believe that logically, I should be able to think of something, I’m asking for your opinions:

What are the “Fad Diagnoses” of contemporary EMS? Feel free to add your own in the comments section below. I’m sure this could get wildly entertaining.

(Oh, and I’m not making any clams as to the existence or non-existence of any of the “Fad Diagnoses” posted here or on the other site. If you think they’re real, then heck… why not?)

Posted by on August 12, 2010 • Filed under: Emergency Medical Services, EMS, ems education, EMS ethics, EMS Topics, Paramedic, patient care, Patient Management, politics, STEMI, Training & Development

Volunteer Fire/EMS: Taking the High Road and Letting go

14 comments

My father helped people. Not only was he the 20 year volunteer Fire Chief of the small town we grew up in and a 30 year volunteer firefighter, he also owned the country hardware store and provided the tools and equipment needed to keep all of the farmers in the area up and running. He was always on-duty for both jobs. It was a commonplace occurrence for our phone to ring anytime the store was closed with someone on the other end asking for something that they absolutely needed right then. He’d invariably go over and meet them to get them what they needed. He’d also be happy to go out and fix things for people when they needed it and couldn’t quite do it themselves. It’s what having a country hardware store was all about, I learned from him. People needed help, and we helped them.

That’s not all. We lived in Northern Illinois about 2hrs from where I live now. Every time it snowed my father, brother, and I were up before the sun helping to clear the storefronts of snow. After we did that, we’d plow the fire station so the trucks could get out. If it was Sunday, we’d meet other people at the church and get the sidewalks and the parking lot clear before the service. Then, we’d make sure and plow the driveways and shovel the sidewalks of the elderly and infirm in the town. It wasn’t a big town, just a few hundred people, so we knew who needed our help and who could do it themselves. We’d usually be able to make it to school on time, but the school teachers knew what we were doing and were happy to excuse a late arrival. The town was small, interconnected, and friendly. We all helped each other out and could depend on our neighbors. That’s just the way it was.

Growing up with the example of my father, my mother, and the rest of my family taught me that helping people was just what we did. I try to teach my son the same thing… that “Our Family Helps People”. I want him to be unafraid to lend a hand to those in need and I’m trying to live up to the example set by my father.

Back then, helping people seemed so easy. Sure, it was hard work sometimes… but we were happy to do it. Helping people feels good. I’ve always said that I’ve gotten more back from working in EMS and the fire service than I could ever hope to give back to it. Helping people is in my blood, volunteering is in my blood.  My community needs me to volunteer for it, and I need to volunteer for my community.

Those of you that read the blog often know that I am a volunteer paramedic and firefighter as well as being a full time paramedic and firefighter. In both of my full-time jobs, I interface quite a lot with volunteer agencies and personnel. I know the volunteers well and I’ve explored the internal workings of a number of volunteer agencies. I don’t think that volunteers are “ruining” EMS or the fire service as I’ve seen some of my readers comment, but I don’t think that volunteer agencies should be exempt from even one requirement of their full-time counterparts. Volunteer agencies have a lot to live up to. They need to recruit and retain good people and they need those good people to want to devote large amounts of effort and time to help the agency succeed. They have to be well ran and have to make their people feel good about being there.

I’ve been around the business for a long time now and “helping people” has never been as easy as it used to be when my dad got me up for shoveling snow. Helping people has been sullied by politics, by personality conflicts and power plays, and has been tainted by flawed goals other than the pure want to help our neighbors in need. The myth of the “volunteer shortage” is just that. There is no shortage of people who want to “Help people”. There’s simply a shortage of volunteer agencies that aren’t tainted by personal politics. The fire service, EMS, and its close relatives have oodles of interpersonal politics at play in their internal workings. It pulls these agencies apart at the seams and puts people through the meat grinder unnecessarily. Good people get SO ANGRY at other good people and the original mission and drive that caused these good people to join the volunteer agency gets lost. Grudges get created and held for unbelievable long times. Feelings get hurt, people get hurt, and the community suffers for it.

Enough.  

If I have been guilty of this kind of behavior in the past, let me apologize for it now. I resolve to let my grudges go and work for the best interests of my community and of the people in need. If my personality doesn’t fit well with another volunteer’s I resolve to work with that person to the best extent because the fact that we both are there for our community and are committed to our mission gives us common ground to build upon. When I disagree with another committed person, I resolve to handle it in the most positive way possible and find the best solution for all concerned. I resolve to be nice and stay positive. I resolve to show resolve for making our agency the best it can be.

Look at that previous paragraph. It was hard for me to write that because while I have my grudges and disagreements with other volunteers, I don’t believe that they are my fault. Read that again. I don’t believe that I am at fault for the disagreements, arguments, and anger we’ve generated. I don’t believe I am at fault for the grudges I’ve held. I don’t believe that *I* am the one in the wrong.

Nobody wants to believe they are the ones in the wrong.

I’m letting that go. It doesn’t matter who is at fault. None of it is good for the community. It’s not good for our agency. It’s not good for our patients and it’s certainly not good for the people involved. While I will always believe in the free, fierce, and open debate of ideas, I’m resolving not to get angry anymore. I’m not bringing my ego to the table anymore. I want my agency to succeed, I want our community to be safe, and I want everyone that is dedicated to helping my community to do the best in life that they can.

Is it time for you to let things go as well?

Posted by on August 2, 2010 • Filed under: Administration & Leadership, Command & Leadership, Emergency Medical Services, EMS, EMS ethics, EMS Topics, Fire Rescue Topics, politics, professionalism, volunteer fire department, volunteer firefighter

Four Words: EMS, Apathy, Disgrace, Massachusetts.

12 comments

By now you’ve all heard of the flap that is happening in Mass. regarding the 200 or so EMTs and Paramedics that had their licenses suspended or revoked for running a non-existent training program or for falsely representing that they attended non-existent training classes. If you haven’t heard about it by now, you’re probably not following EMS news as much as you should.

Here is one of the articles on the subject from JEMS.com

The issue has been discussed quite a bit around the EMS blogosphere. Some big name bloggers have written on it, and I even discussed it a little bit on the EMS Educast the other day.

Here’s TOTWTYTR’s take on this: I’m Not Very Sympathetic

And here’s Rogue Medic’s take on it: (this is a part-2 that reiterates the first)

Here’s the episode of the EMS Educast where we discussed the issue briefly

Other than for speaking about the issue briefly, I’ve been avoiding writing on it. My job is usually to report positive things that are happening in the EMS world and this is definitely not a positive thing. In fact, it’s a disgrace to us all. Rogue Medic has it right when he asks the question “Why do we Encourage such apathy in EMS?”

And that’s what this is. It’s not just that it’s apathy for the boring destruction of brain cells that we call “Continuing Education” in most areas of EMS, it’s the apathy for the whole process. The apathy where we as a profession have let the standards get to this point.

I mean, really. How many of you feel that the continuing education you receive is anything more than something you have to do in order to keep your license up? How many of you feel that your regularly scheduled, mandatory, continuing education classes are of any quality? How many of you feel like they’re actually doing anything good for you?

And that’s the system in which we function. TOTWTYTR made the statement that he sits through boring traning classes all the time because those are the hoops he has to jump through in order to maintain his licensure. I do too, of course. I sit through probably as many or even more classes than anyone reading this article because I am a practicing paramedic with National Registry and licensure in three states. Sometimes the training from one state carries over into the next, and sometimes it doesn’t. At any rate, I get to listen to unmotivated speakers read flat material whilst sitting in an uncomfortable chair on a very regular basis. We all do.

However, I feel that I keep up my continuing education quite well on my own through other means such as extensive self study and non-credit medical education. Keeping my professional skills sharp is very important for me because not only am I proud of my professional skills, but I am well aware of the fact that the quality of my skills translates into the quality of life for my patients. If I keep myself sharp, I’m a better paramedic. If I let them get dull, well then I’m an apathetic paramedic who isn’t doing my duty. Duty is important to me. So are things like Pride, Professionalism, and Honor. In fact, those three words are more than just the slogan for my blog, they are how I think that I and other EMS professionals should live their lives and careers.

Others have been quick to demonize the 200 suspended EMTs. Others have been quick to defend them. The ones defending them have said that these people are apt to lose their incomes, their livelihoods, and that the punishment is unfair. Well, for that part I disagree. The punishment is indeed fair. You could have killed someone by being untrained oafs with lackluster skills. You never proved you were otherwise. However, if you were to ask me if I thought that a state EMS agency – ANY state EMS agency – was competent to manage such a program, I would laugh at you.  Every state has made an attempt to regulate continuing education and I agree that there is a good reason for them to do so. I would also agree that the prospect of regulating a group of EMS people in their continuing education efforts is a daunting task. I would say that the perfect system has yet to be developed and that a good number of the 200 were simply “playing the game” and thought that since their states EMS continuing educational system was a joke that they could make a joke out of it as well.

Here’s the most biting apathy of all to me. If you believe that a system that you work under is a joke. If you believe that there is a better way to do something. If you believe that what you’re made to do is pointless and obsolete… then why the heck haven’t you done anything about it?

I’d like you to look at this issue from this perspective, folks. Sure, not everyone in that group of 200 were caring, competent professionals. I’m sure some of them were jackasses. (And yes, I said “Jackasses). However, I’m also sure that there is a percentage of them in that group that sincerely care about being the best they can be in EMS and they simply got caught up in the mob mentality. I’m sure that some of them had just given up. I’m sure some of them were good people who just became apathetic.

I hate apathy.

If what, say 50% of that group were of the caring kind, that leaves 100 people who thought that the system was broken. Did it not occur to any of those 100 people to try and change it? Did they not try and band together to improve the system? Could one person do it? Could 100 people do it?

If we are to be regulated and controlled by obsolete and ineffective bureaucratic systems, then it is our duty to rise up and change things. Sure, that sounds melodramatic… but how many times have you thought that your state regulations were stupid. One of the defining aspects of a Profession is Self-Regulation. Look at your states “Bar Association” for Lawyers, or the states “Medical Association” for physicians.

Is there any state out there that has a “Paramedic’s Association” that has any teeth to it?

No continuing education system or relicensure processes is even close to perfect. That’s because of a few reasons, not the least of which is because the government is the one running it. The other reason could be because it isn’t being policed by the paramedics who care about it the most.

I’ve said it before, I’ll say it again. It’s time for us to take ownership of our profession. Stand up and make this the profession it deserves to be. Stamp out apathy and band together to let your voices be heard. If you don’t start the process of meaningful change, who do you expect to do so?

——————————————————-

For more positive discussion on EMS, check out the comments section in “Negativity? You Won’t Find That Here” or for a description of two real-world moral and ethical dilemmas in EMS, check out “Two Cases, one letter. From one paramedic’s struggles, change can come”

Posted by on July 9, 2010 • Filed under: Administration & Leadership, ckemtp rants, Command & Leadership, edemse, Emergency Medical Services, EMS, ems education, EMS ethics, EMS rant, EMS Topics, Ethics, everyday ems ethics, Paramedic, paramedic education, politics, Training & Development, Uncategorized

Should EMS Improvise? And the Recipe for the “Kaiser Cocktail”

29 comments

Here’s the recipe for what I call the “Kaiser Cocktail”:

  1. Look in the patient’s kitchen cupboards until you find a box (or a bag) of some type of granulated sugar, powdered sugar, or brown sugar. (in a pinch, you can use honey or syrup)
  2. Find one of the patient’s own cups or glasses, wash it if you have to.
  3. Dump a bunch of the sugar in the glass.
  4. Look in the patient’s refrigerator until you find some soda pop or some type of sweet juice like orange, apple, or grape juice.
  5. Pour that in the glass with the sugar.
  6. Mix it up really well with some type of stirring device. Don’t use your pen or your finger. (Your partner’s pen or finger is ok though.) (Not really.)
  7. Serve warm, chilled, or tepid. Garnish with a peanut butter and jelly sandwich.

Have you guessed what the “Kaiser Cocktail is used for? If you’re in EMS I’m pretty sure you may have figured it out. It’s for sweetening up your local mild hypoglycemic… and no, it’s definitely not for serving to my son right before I drop him off with the in-laws for revenge purposes. The Kaiser Cocktail is for those patients who have blood glucose levels in the mid double digits but that still have the mental faculties necessary for drinking fluids and for protecting their airway while they do it. It’s a home remedy of sorts and it isn’t exactly the kind of thing that they teach you in EMT school. It works like a charm every time and I’ve never seen it not be well tolerated by the patients I’ve used it on or by the families that watch me do it. In fact, the families always seem more than willing to help whip one right up when I ask them to do so.

Picture this scenario: Your ambulance is dispatched to the “Known Diabetic with Altered Mental Status” at an address a short 8 minutes away. You respond to a well kept address in a nice neighborhood and are directed into the residence by a twenty-something female who tells you that her grandfather “Just isn’t acting right and won’t get out of bed”. Seeing no obvious hazards, you enter the residence with the granddaughter and follow her to the back bedroom of the residence to find a 60-something male patient sitting on the bed. He acknowledges you when you introduce yourself and you can see that he’s trying to talk but that he cannot seem to form the words. You say to him “Howdy! How are you feeling??” He answers: “Um… hello…” with a normal voice quality. His airway is patent, his skin is pink, warm, and sweaty, and he doesn’t appear to have any hemispheric neurological deficit. His pulse is bounding and regular at the radial and his respirations are normal. The granddaughter tells you that the patient is diabetic and that he takes insulin.

Got the case diagnosed yet? I’d bet you do. The next thing I would do with this patient is to take a quick finger stick glucose check. For the above fictional scenario, the reading would be 40mg/dl (which is um… “something’ MMOL for you British folk). It’s mild hypoglycemia. I ruled out a possible stroke (CVA/TIA) with the Cincinnati Pre-Hospital Stroke Scale and he patient’s cardiac function seems very normal with his bounding, regular pulse rate. The diaphoresis (sweating) and skin color are differential signs of hypoglycemia, and the patient’s past medical history helps clinch the field diagnosis. This patient’s blood glucose level dropped too low for his brain to function normally and he needs more sugar coursing through his veins in order to feed his brain.

You may be wondering why I brought forth such a common, run-of-the-mill patient presentation on the blog today. As pre-hospital providers, we have a few options available for us that could be considered proper care for this patient. Most EMTs have oral glucose paste at their disposal and a growing number of EMT-Basics carry Glucagon for IM injection. EMT-Intermediates and Paramedics usually have both of the previous medications available and almost all of them carry D-50, or 50% Dextrose solution in water, for IV administration. All of these treatments could be considered for this patient; however I would pull out my namesake concoction in this case. Call it experience, but starting an IV and giving D-50 seems like it would be risky overkill for this patient and an IM injection of glucagon saps the patient’s natural reserves of glycogen for quite a while after administration. Patients seem to hate the taste of oral glucose paste (Lemon?? Really??) and one tube never sees to do the trick. We only care two of them anyway.

That’s why I use a Kaiser Cocktail with these patients. As long as the patient can maintain their own airway and there’s not an aspiration risk, I can’t think of any contraindications once you rule out a possible stroke. It’s cheap, easy, and it has worked like a charm for me every time I’ve tried it. I like using it too, as it feels like a “Mr. Wizard” type home remedy that always fascinates the patient’s family members who watch me make it up.

Here’s the rub though, nowhere in my protocols does it give me authority to give a patient any nourishment or fluids by mouth. In fact, I can’t give a patient anything to eat or drink that isn’t specifically allowed by my standing orders. In EMS, even something as innocuous as sugared-up orange juice can be a legal difficulty. Common sense isn’t allowed by lawyers, unless of course they’re saying you should have used some. The reality is that every time I whip up a Kaiser Cocktail, I’m putting my license at risk.

I used a Kaiser Cocktail as recently as of the day I’m writing this post and I’m asking for a debate here. I’d like it if you would please answer some questions for me below the post in the comments section:

  1. Do you think that the Kaiser Cocktail is an appropriate treatment for mild-to-moderate hypoglycemia in a known-diabetic patient with a patent airway?
  2. Do you see any contraindications or risks that I have missed?
  3. Would a tube of oral glucose paste (or tablets, if you use them) be more appropriate than the Kaiser Cocktail?
  4. Should EMS providers be allowed to improvise treatments such as the Kaiser Cocktail for these and other like situations? Why or Why not?

I can’t wait to see your answers.

Posted by on June 21, 2010 • Filed under: Administration & Leadership, Ambulance, Emergency Medical Services, EMS, ems 2.0, EMS ethics, EMS protocols, ems scenario, ems scenario based education, EMS Topics, EMS training, medical ethics, Paramedic, paramedic education, Patient Management, Protocol development, scenario, scenario based training, SMG, SMO

Rural EMS – A Fictional Letter to the Small Town Community

17 comments

Rural EMS has it’s challenges, not the least of which are the low pay and long hours. I believe that the lives of those in the sticks are just as important as the lives of those in the city and that rural folk need paramedics too. This is a fictional letter with a very real message. It could be written by a lot of paramedics and EMTs to a lot of people who live out in the sticks and I could have written this letter once when I left my small town EMS service to seek my EMS fame and fortune out there in the Big City. Now that I’ve come full circle and I’m once again working rural EMS I’m starting to wonder when I might have to write this letter again.

————————————————-

Mr. and Mrs. Penry

1212 Gravel Road

SmallTown, USA.

Dear Mr. and Mrs. Penry,

                My name is Chris and I am a paramedic working for your local EMS service. I live here on Mulberry St. in SmallTown and my parents and grandparents live out here as well. I’ve seen you on the street, at the local café, and pretty much anywhere in town for most of my life. I went to high school with your son, Johnny and thought about dating your daughter once but could never work up the courage to ask her out. I wanted to take her to the prom but I ended up taking Mary Buckrop instead. We sure got us in some trouble with the Sheriff when he caught us out by the lake, but he ended up letting us go. Thank goodness that he turned out to be so nice. He was one of the people that helped me through Paramedic school. He kept telling me that we needed good people for the ambulance out here in SmallTown and I’ve found out that he was right. We do.

                That’s why I’m having trouble writing this letter to you, Mr. and Mrs. Penry. I’ve taken it upon myself to write a personalized letter to everyone in the SmallTown EMS district because I’m facing a hard decision that I’d like you all to know about. I’ve been a paramedic now for the last ten years. I became an EMT and started volunteering with the SmallTown EMS District right out of high school and did that while I worked down at the Grain Elevator and put myself through college over in MidSizeTown. It was there that I decided that I wanted to be a paramedic and I completed my paramedic training at St. MidSize Hospital. I immediately fell in love with the work and I knew that it was something that I always wanted to be a part of. I continued volunteering with SmallTown EMS while I worked a full-time job for MidSizeTown Ambulance Service. I worked there for seven years and got a good bit of experience. I also worked part-time at St. MidSize’s Emergency Room. I still do.

                Three years ago when the voters approved SmallTown EMS District’s referendum to hire full-time paramedics, I jumped at the chance to come on board. This is my home. As cheesy as it may sound, I feel a connection with the people here in SmallTown and I feel that it’s my duty and my calling to protect them with my Paramedic skills. I’ve always studied and trained hard throughout my career to be the best paramedic I could be because I’ve felt it was my duty to be my best. I felt very good about coming on board with SmallTown EMS to protect my Neighbors, family, and Friends here in my hometown.

                Rural EMS is different than is EMS in the city. Sure, we may not be as busy out here in SmallTown as we could be if we were a bigger city, but that doesn’t make it easier on us. People out here don’t have access to primary care since Doc. Walters closed up his shop. While they can drive out to see the clinic in MidSizeTown, that’s thirty miles away. Most people don’t make the drive as often as they should and since people aren’t getting regular checkups and primary medical care they tend to let their minor and chronic conditions get so bad that when they finally call us, it’s because they don’t have anything else they can do. A lot of the time, their minor condition has become life threatening because it got out of hand. We can take them to St. MidSize ER, but they don’t have the capability to do things like perform cardiac catheterization surgeries to fix heart attacks, or to take care of trauma patients that need surgery right away, or to handle complicated patients in their inpatient wards. Their “ICU” is staffed by some dedicated people, but it only has two beds. This means that we have to bypass St. MidSize ER for the bigger hospitals in BigTown and that’s an hour away for us running Lights and Sirens. Because we have such long transport times and because our patients tend to be pretty sick when they call for us, we have to provide critical care level interventions. We carry more medications with us than do the big city ambulances and we can do more things than they can. That’s because ambulances in the city don’t have to be with their patients for as long as we do. They have a hospital within ten to fifteen minutes transport time of anywhere they may be. We have one within thirty minutes to an hour away. The fact that we’re so far away from hospital care forces us to be on our game all the time. We also have to be on call a lot to cover the duty ambulance when it’s away transporting a patient to the Big City. A normal call can take two hours. A critical call can take three or four. If we didn’t listen up, the calls that happen while the duty ambulance is away wouldn’t get a paramedic. I try not to let that happen.

                Here’s the deal, Mr. and Mrs. Penry, I’m not complaining about my job. I love it. I love the work and I really don’t mind all of the hours that I have to put in. While it’s hard on my family to have me gone so often, they have always understood. My wife Mary supports me in my desire to cover the town we grew up in. She has since Prom night. She’s been great. However, we’ve got our new little boy that just turned three this last month and he doesn’t understand why Daddy has to be gone so often. He also is starting to get very expensive, as kids do, and the meager salary I get working in town isn’t covering all of my bills. I took a pretty hard pay cut to come here. I wanted to and thought that I could keep my part-time job at St. MidSize to make ends meet. Unfortunately, since I’m always on call for SmallTown, I can’t hardly work any hours at St. Midsize. We don’t get paid to be on call, only for when we’re on duty and I’d say no to covering… but then someone in town might die because I’m not here to take the second call. I answer the second call all the time, like I did the night of Johnny’s car accident. I’ve heard he’s doing better but I can tell you that he probably wouldn’t be had I not decided to stay home and cover that night. Mary had plans to go to dinner in MidSizeTown but I just wanted to stick around for an hour to make sure the duty truck was back in town. I’m sure glad I did.

                I’m going to come right out and say it. There’s a job opening in BigCity EMS that would pay me twenty-thousand dollars a year more than I make here in SmallTown. I’d be able to work one job and wouldn’t have to put in so many hours away from my family. We wouldn’t have to skimp and save to pay the bills nearly as hard as we do now. I’d love to stay here and take care of my home town but the pay is just too low to survive on. A lot of good people have left since we went full time when they realized they couldn’t survive on the pay. I’ve been doing my best to train the kids that they hired to replace them, but they only seem to be coming here to use it as a stepping stone to a better job in the big city. I think that our town deserves better but I can see why the people would leave. I didn’t become a paramedic to get rich but I don’t think that I deserve to live in poverty because I choose to help my home town. People out here need experienced paramedics just as much as the people do in the big city. The lives of the people in the city aren’t any more important than the lives of the people out here. I feel strongly about rural EMS and I feel strongly about my home town… I just can’t make it anymore. The bank might come take the house and my family doesn’t deserve to suffer because I choose to help those that can’t pay me back.

                So, Mr. and Mrs. Penry, I’m asking you what you think I should do. One day the unthinkable is going to happen to someone and I want to make sure that there are good people to take care of them when it does, but I can’t have my family suffer financially anymore. My kid needs his daddy and my wife needs her husband. The bank needs the mortgage and my student loans need paying off. It’s a tough decision I’m facing and I’m asking the community what they think I should do.

                If you need me, just call 911. I’ll come like I always do. If I’m not on the duty truck you can just stop by the house. You know how to get ahold of me. Say Hi to Johnny for me.

Sincerely,

Chris NREMT-P

Posted by on June 10, 2010 • Filed under: Ambulance, crisis, Emergency Medical Services, EMS, EMS ethics, EMS Topics, Funding & Staffing, inside the mind of a paramedic, Paramedic, paramedic salary, politics, rural ems, Uncategorized

Master Paramedics? I’m asking you a question

27 comments

Let me ask YOU a question. What do you think about this:

How do we recognize the best and brightest among us? How would we distinguish the EMTs and Paramedics who have earned the respect and admiration of their peers for being “Really Good” at what they do? I don’t mean just a little bit good, or “pretty” good. I mean masterfully good. The kind of Paramedics that Johnny and/or Roy would have wanted to be had they grown up watching them on Saturday mornings. The kind of people that have worked in the profession for as long as they can remember but that never lost the passion for the job. The kind of people who read everything they can, study everything they can get their hands on, and always seem to have the answers to the most challenging of EMS trivia, as well as the most mundane.

What would we call them?

The old trade guilds used to call their most experienced and skilled members “Master”, as in the term “Master Craftsman”. As their members worked through the years and learned the ropes of the trade, they progressed through the various levels until they reached “Master” status. Some unions still use those terms and honestly, I’m unfamiliar with what all of them are. That’s ok with me because I see Paramedicine as a profession and not as a trade, but I do respect their tradition of honoring those that have earned the title of “Master” by thoroughly mastering their craft.

So what do we EMS people do? How would we recognize a “Master Paramedic” or “Master EMT”?

I’ve been thinking about this for quite a while, honestly. As I progress in the profession and in my career path, I’ve seen the people who were my mentors keep working alongside of me. They’re my colleagues now, and although they still mentor me in some ways, they have been progressing along their own paths just as I have this whole time. Some of them have become true masters of the profession. Some of them have not. Some of them could really be called “Master Paramedics” and I would like to know how we as a profession should recognize those people. I see that these people don’t tend to be treated very well by the profession in general and I think that it’s a crying shame. Think about it, new paramedics walk in the doors to the profession and are allowed to work in the same capacity as our master medics within a relatively short time. Employers tend to not want to keep these people around when budgets get tight because these people tend to be on the upper end of the pay scale. In some agencies there’s a defined career path and upward ladder, but in a lot of (and dare I say most) agencies there is not.

So what if there were a certification, or some way to define a “Master Paramedic” and/or “Master EMT”? What would be the qualifications? What would be the benefits? How would we define those people who have earned (Yes, really EARNED) “Master” status?

This is one of the things I’m asking you to think about. If you would please, put some thought into this and write what you think would make a “Master” paramedic or “Master” EMT in the comments section. No, I don’t think that this is silly. I really want to know what you all think about this.

Here’s what I think:

-          Minimum Years in the Profession: The Master EMT or Paramedic should have more than 10 years of FULL TIME service (15 years if volunteer, depending on call volume)

-          Minimum Experience and Type of Calls:  The master EMT or Paramedic should be experienced in a broad spectrum of the different types of EMS. 911 response within diverse response strategies, Medical Transports, and In-Hospital medical care.

-          Teaching and Precepting Experience:  The Master EMT or Paramedic should have experience teaching EMS classes and in mentoring new providers.

-          Command Experience:   The Master Paramedic of EMT should have experience in being in command of different types of emergency scenes and large scale responses.

-          Knowledge:  The Master Paramedic or EMT should have to pass a complex series of tests that show not only rote memorization, but also complete conceptualization and deep background knowledge of a broad spectrum of EMS and Medical related knowledge.

-          Acknowledgement by Peers:  The Master Paramedic or EMT should have the support and admiration of his colleagues, coworkers, and peers and should be able to get them to vouch for him or her when asked.

Now, I also ask you. If you were to recognize a person that could pass the standards that I’ve set, or that you and others set in the comments below, how should we show our respect to these people for their professional achievements? How should our profession honor and acknowledge our highest achievers?

I’m very curious about this issue. Please feel free to add your thoughts.

Posted by on June 8, 2010 • Filed under: Administration & Leadership, appreciation, Command & Leadership, Emergency Medical Services, EMS, ems 2.0, ems education, EMS ethics, EMS Management, EMS Motivation, EMS pep talk, EMS Topics, Paramedic, paramedic salary, pride, profession, professionalism, Training & Development, training-fire-rescue-topics

Grumblemedics

9 comments

Grumblemedics, you know them. You’ve seen them. Heck, you may even be one. Whether they’re a Grumble Pee or a Grumble Bee, there’s an apparent glut of them in the profession and I’d like to know why. See, to me, EMS is the greatest job in the world. Sure, there’s the great pay and benefits, but there’s also the great hours, plentiful time off, and comfortable ergonomic working environment. I can’t tell you how many times I’ve been just left with a warm-fuzzy feeling after a shift…

Ok, so that could have been an exaggeration, I know that there are things in this profession that just plain ol’ stink. But I gotta tell you, EMS really is my favorite job. I really can’t imagine doing anything else. While there are times in my career that I’ve wondered if it was an abusive, co-dependent type of relationship, I realize that I would not want to be anything other than a paramedic.

So why does it seem like there are so many Grumblemedics? Could it be the long hours with little chance of getting a day off? Could it be the fact that we must get up at all hours of the night to take care of someone in better shape than we are? Tangent: The other day another crew transported a person with a chief complaint of “Dry Feet”. When they asked him if he really wanted transported, he said “Yeah! I got dry feet!” Or, the one last night where a woman had an NSAID pain patch fall off at 4am and called us because she thought that she was going into withdrawal. End Tangent.

OK, heck with the ending the tangents. There are a whole heck of a lot of calls that can be filed under “They called us for THAT!?” Why do people do this? Why? I mean, I’ve been called for things that I wouldn’t even take an aspirin for more times in my career that I can count (And I know that’s more than ten because I have ten fingers and if you think that I’m going to take off my boots after working in them for all of these 24 hour shifts you’re nuts). Why do people call us when they have a muscle cramp? Why did the guy call me when he got a fish hook in his finger? Why do people who happen to be type 1 diabetics drink themselves into a stupor and then call me first thing in the morning to wake them up? Seriously, I once spent a few months going to some guy’s house every shift bright and early in the morning to squirt him with a little D50 and he’d sign the refusal that would send him on his way. It ended when we began putting him on the cot and starting to drive to the ER before we sugared him up. He’d wake up in the rig just as we were backing into the bay doors and be mad at US for transporting him. Sorry guy, but you obviously need more help than we can give you.

So, there may be times in my career that I’ve been a Grumble Pee, but that might be expected. Heck, if I worked in a factory I’d probably be complaining about the lack of adequate ventilation and the fact that I couldn’t sit in the crew lounge and watch TV for a few hours of my shift. We all complain about things we can’t change or our own perceptions of injustice. I would guess that any profession has those things that the people in the profession just hate. Heck, would any of us want to work retail during the holidays? They don’t even get to jab strangers with sharp objects or have their own keys to the leather restraints.. Now THAT would suck.

You know what my absolute, all-time, worst pet-peeve is in EMS? No? I’ll bet you don’t care either but this is my rant and you can’t seem to stop me. My biggest, all-time, worst pet-peeve in EMS is: People who don’t call us when they need us. Yep, I would gladly take a hundred 3am “lost condom” calls rather than have one potential patient have that occult MI and lose any percentage more of heart muscle than they have to because they didn’t want to call EMS and bother us. You see, I work in rural EMS these days where people are nice, and they don’t want to bother their local EMS service with getting up out of their chairs, and they don’t want to bother their neighbors with having to look out their windows at the pretty flashing lights, and they really don’t think that the fact that the left side of their body is numb is any reason to be alarmed. These non-calls that should have been calls bother me more than any of them, and we all grumblemedics are somewhat on the hook here.

If you’ve read any of what I’ve written, you’ve probably seen my statement that “PR Saves Lives”. It means that the more positive Public Relations an ambulance agency has, the more people trust them, and the more people are apt to call them when they truly need them. I haven’t seen studies on what an effective PR program does in reducing so-called “nuisance calls”, but I have seen recent studies that say like 60% of patients having heart attacks make their first call to a friend or family member upon the onset of their crushing chest pain. I’m here to tell ya, I’m jealous. I want to get that call.

So maybe grumblemedics like I probably will be about an hour from now when someone calls me at 3am for something that I would take pepto-bismol for need to remember that we are blessed to do this job, and that EMS professionals need to approach this business with the heart of a servant. Because that’s what we are. We aren’t here for our health, we’re here for everyone’s health. Sometimes people get scared and call us because they’re scared and it is our job to make them feel better by telling them they don’t have to be scared anymore. Sometimes we need to haul them in so someone with a whole-heckovalotta medical education can tell them that same thing. I decided a long time ago that if I ever got to a point in my life where I had to call the ambulance just so I could get some human contact because my real chief complaint was loneliness that I didn’t need some punk kid with a pulse and a medic card judging me.

Us grumblemedics need to realize that the nuisance calls are never going to go away. We’ve got to realize that there are, however, ways to combat them:

  • Check your Ego at the Door: You serve the public. Not the other way around. You are blessed and dang lucky to be the person that this person asked to take care of them in their or their loved one’s hour of perceived need and you best not forget it, because your mental health is at stake, and their life could be too. The best EMS people approach this job with a servant’s heart.
  • Evangelize EMS: You want the general public to know how to properly use EMS, right? Then what have you personally done to help teach them. Get out there and get the word out. Don’t hide in your station, or in the parking lot you’re posting in. Get the message out about what you’re there for, what you’re capable of, and how friendly you are while you are doing it.
  • Everything is PR: Every single, solitary thing an EMS person does affects the publics’ perception of them, their service, and the profession in general. Really. When you meet up with another crew for breakfast in the morning and talk about how wasted you got last night at the bar don’t think that the people around you aren’t listening. When you swear in public don’t think that the kids who are looking up to you in your shiny uniforms with your neat big truck aren’t filing that away. Take your public image seriously. Exude professionalism at all times because it saves lives. The more comfortable everyone is with your professionalism affects how apt they are to call you first, call you fast, or call you at all in a life or death situation. That can make all the difference for a lot of potential patients.

There’s a lot more that every one of us can do, but I’m tired here and I still have the last 8 of my 24 to do be
fore I have to get up in the morning and do 8 hours with my other full-time job and then do a 4 hour training with my volunteer department. Hey! I have an idea!! Maybe if there weren’t so many grumblemedics and the public took a more positive view of our value to society we could maybe squeeze some more pennies out of them at budget time and get paid better so we wouldn’t have to have so many freakin jobs and work so many hours to feed our families! Yea, wouldn’t that be great!!

As always folks, comments and flames are welcome. Public commentary is most appreciated, but I may always be reached privately at: proems1@yahoo.com

Posted by on April 8, 2010 • Filed under: Ambulance, EMS, EMS ethics, EMS Health & Safety, EMS rant, EMS Topics, EMT, Fire department, Firefighter, first responder, friendly, grumblemedics, Paramedic, PR, Public relations

Saved by the Bell? High School Student EMS

61 comments

Ahhh, High School. The classes, the lockers, the bells, the peer pressure, the parties, the immaturity, the congestive heart failure, the overdoses, the emergent response, the…

Wait, what?

I’ve been hearing a lot recently about Emergency Medical Technician training being held in High Schools (9th – 12th grades) with teenage high school students being trained to be EMTs. At first blush, it actually seems like an innovative way for communities to meet the EMS staffing shortage problem head-on. In addition, it would seem to be a great way to get young people interested in EMS. In fact, THIS ARTICLE posted recently by Zoll EMS&Fire on their Facebook page seemed like a good idea to me at first. A county partnered with a technical high school in order to train new EMTs to swell the rosters of their county’s services. It’s gotta be a good idea? Right?

Then how about this service in Darien, CT. that is ENTIRELY STAFFED BY TEENAGERS AND HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS? (Dept. Web Site)

Or this service, in Hoboken, NJ that has a student emergency response team that “respond(s) with the school nurse to non-emergency calls”? (additional article)

I have been hearing about such things for a while now and even spoke about it with Tiger Schmittendorf on the March edition of the Firefighter Netcast, however I didn’t give it very much thought until I read the “Last Word” section of JEMS Magazine in what I believe was the March 2010 issue (although I can’t find it anywhere on their web site www.jems.com). It talked about our friends in Darien Connecticut that run Post 53 EMS, a service that is staffed and ran almost entirely by high school students. I was a bit peeved after I read that. Then yesterday when I read the article about the service in Sussex County, I got just plain mad. I don’t agree with this at all. In fact, even though I might have been for it without thinking it through, now I am coming out completely against it.

There, I’ve said it. I am against beginning Emergency Medical Technician training in high school and I am most certainly against persons under the age of 18 staffing ambulances. I also must strongly condemn persons under the age of eighteen responding to emergencies, operating emergency vehicles, or taking responsibility for professional level patient care.

Look at the words there and understand just how much I condemn the actions of the politicians and officials that permit this. You are endangering the public, harming the profession of EMS, and creating a systemic negative impact on patient care throughout the system. You run the chance of increasing patient morbidity and mortality, run the risk of getting teenagers injured and/or killed on an emergency scene, and are exposing youth to situations that they cannot possibly be experienced enough to understand.

I am fully aware that the above paragraph is inflammatory and I am aware that the proponents of these situations are not going to like what I have said, but that doesn’t make it less true. Look for a minute beyond the arguments that you are going to make about the kids themselves, who I am sure are all upstanding young citizens who are surely beyond reproach. Look for a minute even beyond the fact that evaluation of the kids themselves must be taken on “a case by case basis” as I’ve heard before when this issue is argued. T o be certain, there are kids that are capable of functioning to the EMT-Basic level with proper, adult, professional supervision… However, I want to know why there is a perceived need?

The communities that support and offer these plans where students are trained to the EMT level and especially those communities where persons under the age of 18 are active emergency responders generally purport to be offering these plans in order to combat a “shortage” of trained emergency responders. This is where my biggest grievance lies. This “shortage” of which they speak is manufactured. It’s false, and it’s created by the very attitude that causes the local political powers to think that a program that provides a consistent stream of young, inexperienced, naive EMTs who are willing to work just for the “excitement”, “honor”, and “cool factor” that these programs seem to offer is a good idea. Here’s the thing, these communities don’t have a shortage of adult, professional EMTs who are willing to do the job. They have a shortage of adult, professional EMTs who are willing to work for peanuts in a system that has no respect for what they do.

Get it? If you have such little respect for EMS and the EMTs that provide it that you are comfortable letting teenage kids work your trucks, you obviously have such little respect for EMS that you provide horrible pay and working conditions to the point where no self-respecting adult can make a living on the wages and conditions you offer them. There’s no shortage of EMTs willing to provide excellent EMS. There’s a shortage of pay and professional respect that causes them not to be able to survive working the available jobs. Trust me, if these communities paid better and provided better jobs there would be no shortage of EMTs. It’s manufactured by their willingness to just have someone with a pulse and an EMT card on their trucks. It’s manufactured by their thought process that EMS is simply childs’ play and that since “any idiot can do it” they might as well put kids on the trucks. The EMT shortage has always been created by lack of pay, poor working conditions, and an unwillingness of local politicians to provide adequate amounts of these things. Creating high-school EMT programs reinforce this by always providing a stream of fresh meat willing to work for nothing. Young people don’t worry about such things as pay high enough to support a family, nor do they care so much about things like insurance, benefits, or retirement plans. They just want to get out there and go to work. 

I make the argument that putting inexperienced high-schoolers on ambulances increases morbidity and mortality using my experience as an experienced long time paramedic. I offer the full body of research that proves that experienced healthcare providers provide better healthcare than do inexperienced ones. The fact that there’s such little research out there does not diminish the fact that you have no such research that shows safety in what you do. I say that your communities would be better served by adult, professional, well compensated providers. I say that they would save more lives and reduce more suffering than do your high-school kids. It is well known that patients have better outcomes when they trust their healthcare provider and you ask your patients to put their trust in high school students. There are many possible scenarios out there where the patient’s very life and/or death rest upon the skilled interventions provided by an EMT. In these situations, even experienced providers make mistakes. You’re telling me that the incidence of these mistakes will not be unacceptably higher using teenagers?

When your Wife, Son, Husband, Daughter, or friend is lying there, dying on the floor, the roadway, or on the cot, will you feel comfortable with your decision to put a high school student at their side to be in charge of their continued comfortable survival? I make the charge that you will not. Your community members do not need a child coming to them in their hour of highest need. They need a professional, adult provider and your system denies them this.

I support EMS education in high schools. I support explorer programs that give firsthand experience and education to teenagers and younger students. I support CPR and First Aid Training at any age. I will support students coming to the EMS station, cleaning the trucks, taking classes with the crews, learning about EMS, and even staffing first-aid stations and special events under the watchful eye of an experienced adult provider. I do not support students responding in ambulances for the reasons I’ve stated above… but in closing I also offer this:

In one of the articles above, someone stated that these programs prepare students for a career in the emergency medical services. They might. However, by their very existence they prepare students for a career in a low-wage, low respect industry that might as well be provided by teenagers. These programs are a slap in the face to our profession. We will never advance when mindsets like these are allowed to propagate and flourish

Your thoughts?

Posted by on March 29, 2010 • Filed under: 911 fail, Administration & Leadership, ckemtp, ckemtp rants, Command & Leadership, edemse, Emergency Medical Services, EMS, ems education, EMS ethics, EMS Health & Safety, EMS Management, EMS rant, EMS Topics, EMS training, EMT, Ethics, everyday ems ethics, Fire Rescue Topics, Firefighter Safety & Health, medical ethics, politics, rant, Training & Development, volunteer fire department, volunteer firefighter

Huddled Masses. Healthcare. Honor. EMS.

19 comments

A conversation that I had with another healthcare provider has me pondering a lot of things. Until now, I’d been pondering these things in a solitary way but I think that I’m going to put these ponderable thoughts up on the blog.

This post gets a little more political than my usual stuff. I don’t post politics up here unless the politics specifically relate to EMS (unless they’d get me in a lot of trouble, for example the best EMS delivery model).

But today, I’m making an exception. I think that some of the things that I’m pondering have to be put out there and I think that if I don’t throw this out to the blogosphere I’m gonna go nuts.

I work in a community that has a large Hispanic population. A good portion of them are probably undocumented immigrants from Mexico. Yes, I said “undocumented” and that can mean Illegal immigrants if you so choose to say that. It’s a fact that small towns in the Midwest have been growing by leaps and bounds with undocumented immigrants looking to find work wherever they can. Some of them have legal members of their family that they live with, some don’t.

There’s a huge debate going on in this country over illegal immigration. It’s bigger than me, it’s bigger than this blog, and it’s bigger than EMS. I’m not going to get into my personal opinion on the topic as much as I would if we were discussing this in a bar over a couple of beers, or a country cafe over coffee if you’re a morning person. I can say this: I’m all for border security. I’m all for people following the law and I believe that illegal immigration is a drain on our resources. Those points are barely arguable. Another thing I believe in are the words to a song that I used to sing when I was with a rather patriotic small-town childrens’ choir. The song went something like this: “Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe fee. The wretched refuse of your teeming shore. Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me. I lift my lamp beside the golden door!” There’s a lady that stands in the harbor that has these words inscribed upon her, and they mean something.

I look upon this debate and I see both sides fervently trying to destroy any point-of-view other than their own. The lefties want them here because their hearts bleed for them. The righties think that the lefties want them because they can mold them into a new communist workers’ party. Both of them may be right. I am more of the opinion that America is an experiment. We’re a melting pot of people that have come together over the last two-hundred and some odd years to be stronger in our diversity. I believe that any cultural group entering our melting pot should come here and embrace the American ideals. “Melt” into the pot if you will. This has made us strong over the centuries and has built the country that I love, the one I will stand up for. Europe didn’t do that, they isolated their ethnicities into countries and fought amonst each other for a thousand years. We melted and homogenized into a strong nation full of rugged individuals championing their best ideals. I say that the most successful immigrant groups in the storied history of this nation celebrated their old cultures while melting in to our diverse one.

As far as today’s debate goes, I wonder if that would be the whole rub. Are the new illegal immigrants celebrating their own culture while melting into ours? Or our they placing their old culture on top of the American culture and creating discord within a proud nation? I think that we have always accepted the “Tired and poor huddled massess yearning to breathe free” because of our American Dream. People here have equal opportunity, a guarantee of the equal chance for humans to strive to reach their potential. Everyone has the chance to try and succeed to their own definition of success. “Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness” is a guarantee of the chance to pursue. It is not, however, a guarantee of results. Our experiment is that everyone who has the chance will strive to give it their best shot, and that the people who succeed will pull others up alongside them.

I can’t say what’s right here. I don’t know. I don’t want to offend, but here I am, a paramedic. My job is to help everyone and anyone who needs me. I will do so. I have always done so. I took an oath and I honor my convictions. The hypocratic oath means something to me. Healthcare providers are honor-bound to help everyone as much as they can. I always will.

The conversation that we had was short, but he got his point across. I had brought up that while we have a large hispanic population in our coverage area, we rarely have calls involving those hispanic members of our population. I think that this is a bad thing because obviously these people fall ill and get injured at a rate comparable or even moreso than the other demographic groups in our area. I don’t know why they’re not calling but I can figure that it might be alleviated for the good of our community as a whole if we reach out to this population and let them know how, and when, to access the emergency healthcare system. I don’t believe in race and to me “hispanic” is a cultural label and is not even close to whatever “racial” means, but this is a cultural group that should be calling us and doesn’t. It’s deliniated over cultural lines and therefore is handy to address that way.

The other guy thought that it was stupid, pointless, and maybe even wrong to do this. It was because of the “illegal” thing. As strongly as I feel on that issue, and I do have strong feelings, as a healthcare provider my job is to help everyone. Every human deserves the best care that we can give them, every time. I don’t judge people. He shouldn’t either.

Neither should you.

Thoughts?

Posted by on March 25, 2010 • Filed under: Administration & Leadership, Command & Leadership, Economics, edemse, Emergency Medical Services, EMS, EMS ethics, EMS Health & Safety, EMS Topics, Ethics, everyday ems ethics, Fire Rescue Topics, In the Line of Duty, inside the mind of a paramedic, medical ethics, politics, professionalism, socialized medicine, Uncategorized

Trust… It’s everything

4 comments

Dooooo Doooooo! Beep Beep Beep Beep Beep Beep Beep  - Attention AMBULANCE ONE, Ambulance One. Respond Code 3. 1234 Anystreet lane, 1234 Anystreet lane for the (Insert Age and Gender Here) patient found unresponsive, unknown if breathing.

Imagine you heard that dispatch go out just now. Imagine you’re at home, off duty, and just happen to be listening to your dispatch channel. Perhaps you’re a volunteer, perhaps you have a scanner, but picture yourself hearing that and realizing… “Oh My God… That’s So-and-So’s house! A (blank) aged Male/Female? That’s gotta be So-And-So!!”

As an EMS person who lives in your district you know the people who work on the service. Now you’re sure you know the patient too. It’s someone you care deeply about and it sounds like they may be in mortal danger. As someone “in the know” you know what you’re going to do next, right? You’re going to listen intently to whatever traffic happens to come out next on the radio, aren’t you?

“Come on, Come on, Come on!” you think to yourself as you wait the agonizing seconds for the crew to acknowledge the page and go enroute to the scene. “What’s taking them so long!?” you ask yourself. “Ambulance 1 is enroute to 1234 Anystreet Lane” says the crew of Ambulance One over the radio. You don’t think that they sound excited enough. They must not know that this is So-and-So! To them, this is just a routine response for an unresponsive patient. They’re going to do a routine, every day job and perform their routine, every day care. They don’t have any idea that this patient is special to you and they’re going to give this patient the same care they’d give anyone else.

Now, since you’re sitting at home and unable to respond, you’re going to be glued to that radio, right? You’re going to know from the voice on the radio exactly who it is that will be taking care of “So-and-So”. You’re going to either be relieved or horrified by your knowledge of who’s on that responding ambulance. If you have trust in the medic on the truck, you’ll feel slightly better about So-and-So’s chances of survival. If you don’t have trust in the medics, you’ll probably feel a lot worse… right?

It’s always been a sticky ethical situation for a healthcare provider at any level to work on someone they know well and care deeply about. Try it just once, or more realistically for an EMS provider, have the situation thrust upon you, and you’ll see that “Stuff gets real” really quick. We have a vested interest in the care that our loved ones receive and while some of us may know that it isn’t always best that we personally be the one caring for them, we all understandably want them to receive the best care possible.

Trusting a provider to care for your special “So-and-So” is a big deal. I’m sure we all have secret mental lists of our colleagues whom we’d want caring for our loved ones and also our lists of who we wouldn’t. It is a supreme responsibility to be a healthcare provider in charge of the care of any patient and I believe that EMTs and Paramedics hold that responsibility every bit as much as or more so than any other healthcare provider. It is a responsibility that I don’t take lightly and one that I hope my colleagues do not either. We are the first people that our patients and their families want to see walk through their door when the unthinkable happens. When the situation is critical, and skilled, complex, time-sensitive care makes the difference between life and death, we are the ones out there doing just that. A good paramedic must be knowledgeable, highly skilled, and experienced to provide that level of care. Not just that, they must do it every time they get in their truck; because every patient is somebody’s “So-and-So”.

Speaking of “stuff getting real” I have to ask you: What kind of provider are you?

Are you out there every day earning the trust of your peers?

Do you work hard enough, study hard enough, and train hard enough?

Do you do your absolute best for every patient, every time?

When it does happen (and it will) that you are sent to care for a colleague’s “So-and-So”, are you the kind of provider they will trust?

If you think about these questions, you know the answers already. If you can honestly say that you’re good enough, I salute you. If not, well then we have some work to do, don’t we?

Earn it. Study hard. Know your stuff. Do your best. Every patient. Every time.

Posted by on March 15, 2010 • Filed under: Administration & Leadership, edemse, Emergency Medical Services, EMS, ems education, EMS ethics, EMS Motivation, EMS Topics, EMS training, Ethics, everyday ems ethics, Fire Rescue Topics, medical ethics, Paramedic, paramedic education, patient care, Patient Management, pride, profession, professionalism, scenario, Training & Development

Any Random Person

560 comments

I love Dave Barry, he has been called the most influential humor writer since Mark Twain. If you haven’t read any of his stuff, you really should. In fact, I’ll even provide a link to his web site here: www.davebarry.com. Yes, I’m providing that before what I’m sure will be my well-written, extremely interesting content below. He’s that good.

I put that up there because I am going to use a quote of his that he put into one of his columns; he asks his readers if they are saying to themselves “Hey, I can do this! *Any* random person can do this!” And he counters that they are wrong, because “It takes a very special kind of random person to do this”.

And that’s how I’m tying this into EMS.

I work with a few EMT-Intermediates (I-99 curriculum) and some EMT-IV Techs (WI has a version of a basic that can start IVs with NS and give a few IV meds) that are very sour on the fact that they aren’t paramedics yet. They’re not sour on the fact that they do not yet wish to sit through the required education to become paramedics, but they’re sour that there are skills that they can’t do that they see their ALS counterparts doing. They see us “paragods” performing ALS skills and say, “Hey, I can do that”.

And it may indeed be true. I see these days that they keep pushing skills that were once only the domain of paramedics down to the BLS providers. Heck, that’s what EMS is entirely built upon. In the far beginnings of our profession (and we’re still really in the beginning phases) the skills that Paramedics and EMTs perform were once only the domain of physicians. If you would have asked a physician in the 70′s whether a non-physician could interpret an EKG and give relevant medications and treatment as well as he could, you probably would have gotten a very incredulous answer. EMS is all about proving to the medical profession that treatments once firmly entrenched as only for use in the hospital have a demonstrated benefit to the patient when used quickly at the patient’s side close to the onset of symptoms. EMS personnel were trained for that most probably because it just isn’t cost effective to have doctors sitting around manning ambulances.

However, the question that has come up in my mind is where the bottom of that lowering of educational requirements for advanced skill performance ends. I have seen in my career a paradoxical movement in educational standards for paramedics and EMTs. There are a smattering of disparate and yet somehow complimentary certifications in some states, but while some educational standards have improved, most of them have decreased. While a good argument can be made for EMS levels between the Paramedic and the EMT-Basic, such as the I-99 and the IV tech in WI or the Iowa Intermediate in Iowa in the sense that they allow rural communities to be able to perform some advanced skills without having to shoulder the full breadth of costs and responsibilities associated with full paramedics, they also don’t take into account that a lot of those skills require a whole heck of education to be safely performed in the outlying patient that can be harmed by inexperienced providers.

The debate that I got into with an EMT-IV Tech over breakfast the other morning went something like this. He brought up the fact that EMT-IVTs could administer Narcan to reverse heroin OD’s or other narcotic overdoses. His statement to that was that they ought to be then able to give Morphine for pain control “since we already carry the reversing agent” (in case they give the patient too much or the patient has a reaction). My thoughts are that they should not be able to, because the administration of a narcotic for anything requires a requisite knowledge of the pharmacologic, physiological, and social actions of the drug. And while yes, that could be covered in a module I could assume, why should it be? I brought up that it takes physicians years of experience to be able to tell how to identify drug seekers who want to get a high from the legal, medically prescribed narcotic. Contemporary medical journals in family practice and emergency medicine have written volumes on the topic, and still physicians can be fooled. The extrapyramidal reactions possible with morphine, including respiratory and other Central-Nervous-System (CNS) depressing features of the drug have other treatments and symptoms that can be hard to recognize for an inexperienced provider. An EMT-IVT just doesn’t have the breadth of background knowledge needed in order to judiciously use the drug safely in all cases. The fact that most of the time it would work out fine does not withstand the certain percentage of patients that could and would be harmed. I ended the argument with him by bringing up something that I’ve always remembered from paramedic school. Our lead instructor told us that our drug bag was nothing but “A big bag full of poison” if you didn’t know how to use it.

Remember, every single time any medical care provider performs any treatment of any kind on a patient they’re making the statement that “Right now, I know better than your body does. I know better than your brain, your nervous system, and better than all of your body’s self healing systems do what you need to keep living and get better”. Any time you put on a bandage, you’re telling that patient that you know better than their body does that they need to stop bleeding. Every time a paramedic or other provider uses an airway management technique they’re saying that they know how to breathe better for the patient than the patient’s own body does. Every time you give a medication to a patient you’re telling them that you know how best to control their body’s systems. Think about it. Every treatment, every time. It is a HUGE deal to be able to do this stuff, and you dang well better know your stuff.

Physicians are rooted in the quest for knowledge. Their reputation as learned individuals goes back to prehistory in one form or another. They’ve earned their vaulted place in society due to their quest for knowledge and reason and their caring for others above all else. EMS people came from physicians. I can think of no other medical profession that has a downward pressure on their educational standards. I’m saying that, because I think that EMS does. We have elements in our own ranks, and external forces that are continuously working to make us into skills monkeys that can be paid very little and know very little.

This is a big statement: Not everyone can be a good paramedic or EMT. It takes a certain intellect, sound ethical reasoning skills, and a level of professionalism that not everyone can attain.

This is another big statement: There are groups in our society that want to make it so that any random idiot can become a basically qualified one. This keeps us all down and lowers the quality of patient care… a lot.

Yet another: Us good EMS people should be really ticked off that educational standards are so dang low these days. Fight for excellence. Respect ourselves.

If you and or your service want to be able to perform advanced skills, earn the requisite knowledge through your studies and earn the level that it takes to do them. Enough is enough. I don’t believe that we should lower any more educational standards. No other group would do this, not the nurses, not the PA’s, and certainly not the physicians. Why should we? Yes, I understand that with the advent of Urban Fire Based EMS the IAFF and IAFC want to put more paramedics on the streets to increase their influence and their revenues, and that in order to do this they need to match the intellectual skills of medics with the intellectual skills needed to be a good grunt firefighter, but EMS is a MEDICAL profession built from the quest for knowledge. It should not be relegated to the technical performance of skills if X equals Y.

Heck, I think that the current level of Paramedic should be the basic level, and that Paramedics should be as independent as Physician Assistants. In fact, I’d like to see that in the future.

Posted by on March 11, 2010 • Filed under: Ambulance, ckemtp rants, dave barry, edemse, Emergency Medical Services, ems 2.0, ems education, EMS ethics, EMS rant, EMS Topics, EMT, EMT-Intermediate, Ethics, everyday ems ethics, IV, Paramedic, paramedic education, physician

3am with Ckemtp – (See Gus? I can do that too)

3 comments

(The title? My friend Gus writes the blog http://3amwithgus.blogspot.com – Occasionally I throw him a shoutout)

I don’t generally do this much anymore, but this is kind of a personal blog post.

It’s 19 degrees outside and the clock is nearing Midnight here in Illinois. About 20 minutes ago I was snuggled up with my beautiful wife in bed trying to get some sleep before I have to get up at 3am to drive to Milwaukee to catch a flight at 6am. Tomorrow brings something that I’ve been looking forward to for what seems like forever, but really has only been a month or two. Tomorrow I’m heading to Baltimore, MD to attend the JEMS conference, EMS Today 2010.

This is going to be my first big, national conference. Really, I’ve never had the incentive to go before. I’ve always wanted to, but they have always seemed to be too much of an expense and have always seemed far away from what I’ve been doing in the field. Tomorrow I get to see for myself just what the hubbub is about.

But that all seems pretty far away right now as I sit here in my fire station covering the ambulance. 25min ago (now) I was snuggled up all comfy like just in the twilight stage of my sleepy-time cycle when Mama Juggs, the night dispatcher tonight set off the vile tones a few times and sent all of the on-duty paramedics out to the various hospitals, leaving the district uncovered. She toned out for any available paramedic to come in to cover and…

Yes, the above was a horrible way to end a paragraph, (and Greg Friese recently told me I use the elipse (the “…”) too much) but I have to make this statement. Both my wife and I are firefighters and EMS people on the same volunteer/POP/POC/Takes-up-all-of-your-free-time department. We’re both dedicated as the next guy too, and she’s in paramedic school right now. So when the tones went out, I got “the elbow”. No, I didn’t go on the other calls but we had an ambulance crew at all 3 stations with an engine crew on-duty backing them up. There wasn’t a need for me to head in for the EMS calls, until they took all the medics off of the street handling them. They needed a medic to come in for the next call, and I have a Gina at home elbowing me in the ribs to head out into the 19 degree weather to go cover the district. Yes it’s now Midnight, and yes I have to be up at 3am to catch my flight.

I’ve spoken before about the responsibility I feel when I’m the only paramedic available to cover the emergency medical needs of a jurisdiction. Right now, there’s 30k people (roughly) whom for if they have an emergency medical need, I’m now the first person they want to see. If that happens (and now, one of the trucks is returning so the chances are lessening) I better be on my game when I get there.

Anyways, I’m sitting next to Mama Juggs (The Dispatcher, remember?) blogging away, and I should probably be a good conversationalist and talk to her because I haven’t gotten much of a chance to chat with her lately. So, in parting, if you are at EMS Today, come up and say Howdy! to me. If you’re not, be sure to follow me on Twitter and Facebook (the links are over there on the Right. I accept all friend requests that seem like fans.) and I’ll be sure to try and give you a first-hand look at what it’s like at a Big National Conference.

Oh, and the Biggest meetup of EMS and Fire Bloggers is happening Friday night at a pizzeria. BE THERE. If you need info, tweet me and I’ll getcha there. (Connections? I has them)

G’night all.

Posted by on March 5, 2010 • Filed under: EMS Conference, ems education, EMS ethics, ems garage, EMS Topics, EMS training

Guest Post – From JDmedic on Two Cases, One Letter

5 comments

This is a guest post coming to you from a Mr. John Fekety (JdMedic) who took the time to leave a thoughtful comment on the recent post I wrote “Two Cases, One Letter… From One Paramedic’s Struggles, Change Can Come”. He doesn’t have a website for me to link to, but his resume is pretty impressive. I gave him the opportunity to flesh out the thoughts he wrote in the original comment, and I’m turning the post over to him. Good Stuff.

As promised, I’ll put a plug in for his friend’s Safety Training Business: Http://www.Source4Safety.com – Safety & Health Solutions, LLC

—————————————————————

Many good comments were made regarding the anonymous letter published here last week. Here are my two cents on the things raised in the letter by Ckemtp and others. First, I confess that I also routinely rant about other healthcare providers not understanding our profession, what we are capable of and what we required to do at times. However, the point of the matter is it is not in their job descriptions to educate themselves about us. We must become much more proactive in educating professionals and the public about whom and what we are. Granted, in a situation like described with the cancer patient with heated emotions, educating someone is not easy – if indeed possible. However, we need to begin to relate one-on-one during down times and talk about what we do and the things we come up against. Will it solve all of the problems? Obviously not, but it may crack open a door for dialogue in the future that can help defuse a tense situation.

Secondly, as both the letter writer and I have learned you have to pick your battles. Would it have done any good to bring up the MRSA issue with the sending hospital? Probably not. They could have simply said, “We told them.” Or more abrasively, “Are you questioning our professional ability to give a simple transfer report?” I think the suggestion of Dave Konig represents the best of both worlds. You let it slide with the sending facility and keep your relations there happy. However, you protect the patients in the other facility and maintain your professionalism by giving the receiving facility a heads up. Before the patient reaches the room you may say something like, “While I was checking the patient’s history during the transport I discovered a history of MRSA and I wanted to make sure you knew.” Everyone wins. Another part of this lesson is the patient does not leave your litter until you are comfortable with releasing the patient (more on this below), or you have no other choice.

Thirdly, we have to educate ourselves about the programs and people we deal with. In that regard, Dave makes a good point about hospice programs as well. Many hospice contracts require a patient to agree not to go to the ED in exchange for the hospice services, including in-patient care when appropriate. Under those circumstances, a patient who goes to the ED is dropped from the program and becomes responsible for all medical bills. Given the cost of just medications, conditions like this alone could drive a patient and family members over the edge. Whether that was the case with the patient in this instance is unknown. One service that I worked for had the director of a hospice service come out to a meeting and give us a presentation (did someone say education?). She explained the various services of hospice, why they may need a patient transported, and what we could do – within our scope of practice – to make things go as easy for the patient and family. It’s about communication folks.

Fourth, like others here I have been in the situation where I needed to be a patient advocate. I was doing an interfacility transport of a trauma patient who still rated pain at 9 out of 10 after meds. I asked the nurse about additional meds and she said the patient had already received everything he/she could recieve. I could have taken a chance, loaded the patient and called for pain management en route but I chose a more direct approach. I tracked down one of the ED docs and asked him to check on the patient with me since I did not feel comfortable accepting the patient in her current condition. (I learned that once the patient is on your litter nobody is willing to help since the person is now your “problem”.) When he saw the girl, he readily agreed she required more meds and not only ordered more immediately but gave me orders for addtional meds en route if needed. No arguments with the nurse, no bad feelings and the patient got what she needed. However, there are those times when feelings be damned and you have to take a stand for your patient.

An example of that situation was when I did an interfacility transport of a patient going for a cardiac cath and other procedures. The patient, in addition to having flunked his recent stress test, had a hisory of a previous MI. When we arrived at the receiving facility nobody knew where he was supposed to go because there was a question about which of two procedures were to be done first. We were finally sent to one location only to find it empty. We were redirected to another location to put the patient in a room until things were sorted out. We got to a hospital room with no monitor and an aid told us to put the patient in the bed. I asked about the monitor, she said there was none, and since he was not going to be there, long he did not need it. I explained that he came from a monitored bed, he required a monitor in the ambulance and he was not leaving my litter until he could be placed on a monitor. She huffed out of the room and came back with a nurse who restated that a monitor was not available and not needed. When I once again explained that the patient was not leaving my litter until a monitor was found. She left in a huff saying she was going to get a nursing supervisor to “… straighten you out.” I thanked her since getting a supervisor was better than us waging war. She came back without a supervisor, but with a monitor and told me the supervisor said I was to leave. With the patient in the bed and on the monitor, I thanked her for getting it and asked her to sign that she received the patient. Not unexpectedly, she refused. However, the patient’s wife who witnessed me ensuring that her husband received the proper care was more than willing to witness my note that the nurse refused to sign.

If we and the rest of the medical community (and/or the public safety community) want to use polite words, EMS is the redheaded stepchild.(Ckemtp here: “ouch”) In not so nice terms, we are the bastards. Either way, we are the new kids on the block and we still have to prove ourselves everyday. It has not been easy nor will it likely get any easier for quite a while, but there are ways we can stop shooting oursevles in the feet. When we hit the street if we keep the following in mind, maybe we can begin to level the playing field.

1. Look professional: If you wear a hat – one that is appropriate – wear it correctly, not to the side or backwards. How you chose to dress/look on your own time is your business. If your dress impacts me and my profession it becomes my business. Although I slack at polishing my boots, my uniforms are always clean and neat (at least at the start of the shift – stuff happens). Take a couple of seconds to tuck shirts in.

 2. Act professional: Everyone likes a joke. And, God knows many times with what we see we need humor to get through. However, remember what your parents said about a time and a place for everything. The parking area outside the ED is not the place to have a water fight with syringes. Nor is it appropriate to run up and bang on in-coming units.

3. Talk professionally: You do not need to be a walking dictionary or memorize Grey’s Anatomy. For the most part just dropping the slang and cursing would go a long way. “Thank you.” You’re welcome” Have a nice day.” would not hurt either. And out of respect for Thom Dick, let’s get rid of “No problem.” as a response to a thank you.

4. Respect your patients: If you call your patient, any one of the degrading words used in EMS to refer to, especially nursing home, patients (such as cheese or GOMER), go get a job for FedEx or UPS and deliver packages. You will make more money, not have to put up with mouthy nurses or winey patients. These are people we are supposed to be caring for. Many times, there may be nothing we can do except listen or hold a hand – and many times that is enough.

A final thought comes from a quote supposedly said by Mark Twain. “It is better to keep your mouth closed and let people think you are a fool than to open it and remove all doubt.” Whenever it may be possible for you to be an example of an EMS professonal, act like one rather than acting as our detractors characterize us and provding their proof.

There are many things all of us can point to and complain about EMS and the systems, institutions and people we work with. I have worked in other professions and with all of the problems EMS has, I would not want to work anywhere else, as it sounds like so many other people feel.

————————————————————

Great Post, JDmedic. (Yes, this guy has more education than I ever want to sit through). He’s a lawyer-turned-paramedic and that just brings a smile to my face, I have to tell ya’.

Comments are, as always, very much welcome.

(Would YOU care to guest post? Shoot me an e-mail at ProEMS1@yahoo.com – Or Tweet me @ckemtp)

Posted by on March 2, 2010 • Filed under: EMS, EMS ethics, EMS Motivation, EMS Topics, EMS training, Paramedic, profession, professionalism

Two Cases, One letter – From one Paramedic’s struggles, change can come

17 comments

A letter I received from a reader recently has gotten me just as mad as he is, even more so maybe. This letter came in from someone who identifies himself as a paramedic but asks that I protect his identity and location completely. I will do so, only identifying that the letter comes from someone who works out west, somewhere between the Mississippi and Montana but not east as Maine or as far south as Amarillo.

So He comes from somewhere in the US, not the east coast, and not Hawaii. He’s a paramedic and he’s male. That’s all I’ll say. I’m going to work the things he wrote me in his letter with my thoughts and feelings on what he wrote and the situation he wrote about. I’ll rewrite the letter keeping the point of it intact. I’m fairly sure that you’ll be just as angered as I. (Note – This is LONG but it’s good. It will probably tick you off too, enjoy)

(more…)

Posted by on February 25, 2010 • Filed under: Administration & Leadership, change, ckemtp rants, DNR, Do Not Resuscitate Order, edemse, Emergency Medical Services, EMS, ems 2.0, ems education, EMS ethics, EMS Health & Safety, EMS Management, EMS paramedics, EMS system, EMS Topics, Ethics, everyday ems ethics, Line of Duty, medical ethics, Paramedic, paramedic education, patient care, Patient Handovers, Patient Management, politics, potential, PR, pride, profession, professionalism, Public relations, rant, stories

The Perfect Emergency? Well, almost

16 comments

So a while ago, I went to an emergency medical call that was about as perfect as an EMS call could be.

Picture this if you will. Our ambulance was in service. The system was at normal operating levels which are well funded and are adequate for our response loads 90% of the time. I had thoroughly checked and cleaned my ambulance and the equipment inside of it at the beginning of my shift and I had even gotten a chance to have a cup of coffee or two before the call came in. When the call did come out over the radio, it was merely a short walk to the ambulance for my paramedic partner and I. We climbed into our dual paramedic staffed, well maintained, state-of-the-art ambulance, and rolled out to the scene of the emergency which was about 8 blocks away through light traffic. We arrived within 4 minutes of the 911 call and were informed by our dispatcher that the residence was equipped with a “Knox Box” entry system so we could quickly gain entry. We retrieved the key from our ambulance, were able to open the Knox Box, and easily entered the residence using the key inside of it. While entering, we noticed that the resident had a “Vial of Life” sticker on the front door, which signified that the patient was most probably participating in our “Vial of Life” program, meaning that the patient had all of their medical information written down properly on one of our stock forms. In fact, we found the “Vial of Life” right in the refrigerator door, where it was supposed to be.  The patient, an elderly person, had used a (Non brand-name specific) home emergency call button to summon assistance, which we also had recommended to him/her during the public outreach that convinced her to have everything else in place for our arrival.

In short, this patient had done almost everything right. He/She had paid taxes throughout his/her long time living in the district and had supported us in order to allow us to have quality, state-of-the-art equipment. He/She had supported us so that we could get good training as well. He/She had listened to us when we suggested that He/She wear an emergency call button as he/she got up there in years, had written down his/her medical information in the “Vial of Life”, had put the Vial of Life in the correct place, and had even installed a Knox Box on the home so we could gain access quickly.

So what wasn’t right with this call? The patient had been experiencing symptoms consistent with a stroke. In fact, it was an easy diagnosis from across the room type of stroke. The patient had noticed that he/she was possibly having stroke-like symptoms and had decided that it would be best to get cleaned up, get dressed, clean up the house a little, and call a neighbor over to see if he would take him/her to the doctor’s office before the neighbor convinced the patient to press the button and call us out to help. By that time… well let’s hope the doctors can work some magic.

With all of the bloggers, paramedics, EMTs, and everyone else out there harping about “BS” 911 ambulance calls, one would find it easy to overlook cases like the one above. I for one will come right out and say that I will gladly run 100 nonsense EMS calls rather than miss just one of the above… I don’t want someone to die or suffer further morbidity simply because they were too scared, or polite, or timid to call an ambulance.

I don’t know how to fix the problem, I’d just like to remind you all out there that our job is indeed to take care of people when they’re scared, when they’re sick, and when they’re just plain-ol’ stupid. We’re healthcare providers and it’s our duty. No exceptions.

Remember that.

Posted by on February 22, 2010 • Filed under: 911 fail, Emergency Medical Services, EMS, EMS ethics, EMS Management, EMS system, EMS Topics, Ethics, everyday ems ethics, Fire Prevention & Education, Fire Rescue Topics, Paramedic, patient care, Patient Management, scenario, scenario based training
Random Plugin By Best Account Services