Skip to content

Archives for ems-management

See all posts in the network tagged with ems-management

Coming Soon – The Law of Unintended Consequences meets the fire service

2 comments

Remember the post I put up a few days ago entitled “A Predatory Ambulance Fee”? It talked about how the Elgin, IL city council is planning to help recoup their costs for Fire and EMS services by charging for refusals.

(This is the link if you didn’t read it: “A Predatory Ambulance Fee”)

This just in:

Apparently they’re not done proposing new fees in the city. They seem to be very serious about recouping their costs and finding new ways to monetize their services. According to this article posted on Firefighter Nation, they’re planning on adding quite a few new fees to their repertoire.

Here’s the link: “Illinois Department Considers Charging Non-Residents for Fire Services” Read it and see what you think.

The article only mentions two specific fees, a $500 per hour fee for an engine response and $2200 for “a serious car accident where someone has to be transported by helicopter.” These fees are interesting enough, but the article also hints that there are further fees forthcoming.

The chief is quoted as saying that he expects most of these fees to be covered by insurance. After all, he says… that’s what insurance is for.

The chief may be very correct with that statement; insurance exists to pay for the unforeseen costs of bad things that happen to people who pay for it. Insurance companies pay these costs based upon rigid contracts they sign with their customers and charge their customers rates based upon the average risk they assume on behalf of the customer. They will only pay for what they are contractually obligated to pay for. While I have no knowledge of whether or not insurance will actually pay for the charges Elgin is proposing in practice, I’m assuming the city of Elgin doesn’t either and if they don’t seem to care whether the people they are saddling with these kinds of fees are insured for them or not, why should I?

It’s not like these insurance companies aggregate risk across all of their customers and will pass the overall cost of these fees to everyone in the area causing everyone’s insurance rates to go up, right?

Remember, I am not against fire departments, cities, and/or EMS services finding new and innovative revenue streams or ways to defray costs. The City of Elgin is not a villain here. It is very expensive to operate a service and I completely understand wanting to recoup some of those costs. These kinds of fees are somewhat the result of a rigid and over-regulated EMS payment system that chains our entire industry and squashes most hopes of innovation. I believe in EMS payment reform. In fact, I demand it.

But guys? While you’re by far not the only department in the US proposing and implementing things like this… you’re all opening Pandora’s Box. Your citizens are going to fight this, the press won’t be good, and you may end up creating more of a wave of dissatisfaction than you’re really prepared to endure. Think about Moline, IL and what they’re going through right now. Could you imagine their chances of winning their fight if they had implemented these fees?

Then again, perhaps they should implement them in Moline and let the revenue sources balance their budgets… In Moline they say they’re operating at over a $340,000 budget deficit and maybe these kinds of fees would offset that deficit enough that they could make their EMS financially viable.

Or maybe the marketplace will decide and departments that do this kind of thing will be put “out of business” (for lack of a better term) by competitive forces.

I would be willing to bet that there’s someone out there that would only charge $450 an hour for an engine response and only $2100 for a “serious car accident”. There are probably plenty of people and companies that would be happy to do fire response for profit. That’s what happens when governmental services start acting like monopolies in a capitalistic system, they get replaced by free market alternatives. Back in Ben Franklin’s day the fire service was a private endeavor that was only made public when the cost of providing protection wasn’t profitable enough to serve the ends the people wanted it to serve. Make the fire service profitable and private industry may find a way to make a solid business model out of it. Don’t believe me? Think Fed Ex and UPS versus the US Postal service.

I’m not saying it’s a good or bad thing. It’s why private industry exists. If there’s an opportunity to make money doing something, someone will step up to make money doing it. These fees, if they become lucrative, may just be the opportunity for private industry to find a business model that didn’t exist before.

I am able to understand why Elgin wants to implement these fees… but I think that this is a situation ripe for the Law of Unintended Consequences. If I could give cities proposing these kinds of fees some advice I would tell them they should find every single efficiency within their existing budgets before they set about increasing revenue through raising fees. Make no mistake, within the contemporary political climate; citizens are going to scrutinize every aspect of your budget when you start trying to get them in the wallet. You may not like what they find.

I don’t have the ultimate answer but I’m keeping an eye on this story. You should too.

Posted by on November 4, 2011 • Filed under: 911 fail, Administration & Leadership, ckemtp rants, Command & Leadership, Economics, Emergency Medical Services, EMS, ems 2.0, EMS Management, EMS Topics, fire, Fire department, Fire Rescue Topics, Firefighting Operations, Funding & Staffing, News, northern illinois, politics

Tripping at the Hospital – A Teachable Moment for EMS

5 comments

Quick: Name the safest place you can think of to have a medical emergency.

Would it be inside of a hospital? Maybe an ambulance base? Perhaps a concert venue with medical staff on site?

Back when I worked in a hospital, we used to have a procedure called a “Code Green.” We’d call one on the occasion of “A medical emergency occurring in a non-patient care area of the property resulting in a need for emergency medical care.” It was implemented in the early 2000’s in response to the disorganized response we had been seeing to on-property medical emergencies in areas such as the parking lot or the hospital lobby. Usually Code Greens would result from someone falling however they occasionally resulted from some other type of medical problem. I even think they even worked a cardiac arrest in the parking lot on a day I wasn’t on-duty. My position at the hospital was a cross between a Security Guard and an EMT as I progressed through Paramedic school. At that chain of hospitals with three campuses and around 500 beds, the Security department operated an ambulance service to do interfacility transports between the ERs and inpatient units. It was an interesting system. As Security/EMTs we naturally became the primary responders to “Code Green” calls, which seemed to happen once or twice a month in my recollection.

I was reminded of our Code Greens when I read this article coming out of Niagra Falls, Ontario (Canada) concerning an elderly woman who fell while walking out of a hospital.

According to the article from The Toronto Star, the 87 year old woman was leaving the facility after visiting her terminally ill husband when she suffered a fall and fractured her hip in the hospital parking lot. The article has a fairly critical tone towards the hospital and its staff; blasting them for having to call an ambulance and for the time it took to get the woman off of the ground. The woman, who in the article is stated to have a previously fractured arm, is reported to have laid on the ground for “Nearly 30 minutes” while waiting for the ambulance to transport her to the ER, which is stated by her son to be “only 50 yards away” from where the fall occurred.

I linked this article today because I believe the opinions expressed show a great deal of information towards the public’s perception of the roles of healthcare workers. The article seems to think that it’s quite ironic that an ambulance was called by hospital staff… to a hospital. When, according to the article there were two nurses on the scene. The article places the orthopedic surgeon who happened by “eventually” and “moved the woman into a wheelchair” as the hero of the story.

My thoughts here are that the nurses who were called to the scene of the fall most probably identified the woman as being at a high risk for further injury from additional movement as evidenced by the fact that she had a previous arm fracture and what I would guess to be an obviously fractured hip. Their concern was probably that further movement of the patient in an incorrect fashion would have aggravated her injuries and could have resulted in further damage. As far as I know, Canadian nurses (like their US counterparts) aren’t trained to move patients with potential spinal injuries and obvious hip fractures who aren’t prepackaged by EMS crews or otherwise immobilized. They also most probably did not have access to the proper equipment needed to do so. In fact, the physician who picked up the patient “with the assistance of an aide” and placed the woman in a wheelchair would have been lambasted if he were a paramedic. While I’m going to assume that an orthopedic surgeon would have extensive knowledge of the human skeleton, it’s not exactly optimal care to bend a hip fracture the 90 degrees to move a patient from a supine (or prone) position to an upright seated one. In this case, packaging the patient on a long spine board with full cervical spinal precautions would have been the best medicine. Everyone has their areas of expertise and as we’ve all observed, or at least became aware of by watching the trial of Dr. Conrad Murray in the MJ death fiasco, doctors aren’t always the best experts in emergency care. That’s what Paramedics and EMTs are for. EMS people are the “Masters of the Acute”. Our specialty is those things that are happening in the here and now. It would have been irresponsible for the nurses to move the patient in this article without having the requisite training and equipment and even the physician that did move her risked causing further injury. While the article lauds him as the hero of the situation, the headline just as easily could have been about how he paralyzed her or lacerated her femoral artery when he moved her obvious fracture 90 degrees.

In my opinion, the statement of the hospital administrator is laughable. It’s doublespeak and must have been given for purely political reasons… I hope.

From the article:

“The supervisor of the Niagara Health System said the incident stemmed from a communication problem among staff.

“We shouldn’t have called the emergency room,” said Dr. Kevin Smith, who was hired on to aid the beleaguered region at the end of August. He said when a person is hurt in hospital, staff should call a “code,” meaning a team — not necessarily in the ER — is paged to help immediately.

When asked why staff felt the need to call for an ambulance, Smith said that may have been an old rule at the hospital. He said staff has now been briefed on the correct policy and a review is underway.

He could have mentioned any of the above things that I mentioned and it would have been just fine. It might have even been a non-issue if Canada’s less-litigious society is taken into account. Instead of stating that nurses aren’t paramedics and aren’t trained to do the same things, he backpedaled and blamed “communication problems” and “old rules”. I can’t say… but maybe this hospital administrator just doesn’t get the difference in emergency healthcare professionals either.

The writer of the article sure doesn’t.

We need to get the word out that EMTs and Paramedics are highly specialized emergency healthcare professionals with expertise in handling acute emergency situations. We are not interchangeable with other healthcare disciplines. Saying that a nurse or even a physician is a good substitute for a paramedic is missing the point that emergency healthcare is different than other specialties. EMS is truly a specialty requiring expertise, practice, and study. A person cannot just be thrown into the position and be expected to perform… no matter what the setting of the emergency happens to be.

This article provides our profession with a teachable moment. I just wish we all had the ability to seize upon it and spread the right message.

The safest place to have a medical emergency? It’s right next to a paramedic. No questions here.

Posted by on October 31, 2011 • Filed under: Ambulance, Emergency Medical Services, Emergency Nurse, Emergency room, Emergency Room Nurse, EMS, ems education, EMS Management, EMS Topics, hospital, News, Paramedic, Patient Management, politics, RN

GPS in the Ambulance – An overreliance on Ms. Kitty

16 comments

Actual conversation between me and my partner a few years ago right after receiving an emergency call:

Me:        “Lemme get this on the map… I think it’s South of us. Head South… Southeast! Yeah, it’s Southeast of us”

Her:       “Whattaya mean Southeast!? I don’t know directions. You’ll have to tell me Left or Right!”

Me:        < Scanning the map> “Um… Ok, we’re heading North, so make a Right up here on River Drive and head to Mulford. The street is right off of State and Mulford, one West and two South”

Her:       “It’s what?”

Me:        “Just head to State and Mulford and I’ll get ya in”

Remember that? Remember those days when we used to use paper maps? I do. Man, those days were crazy… back when we had to use those archaic things, right?

Actual conversation between me and a different partner in the much more recent past while driving to an emergency call:

Me:        “Dang it! The GPS won’t get satellite signal! I can’t lock in the address”

Him:       “Where do I turn? What street is it off of?”

Me:        “Hang on, I’ll try to look up the address from my phone… Gah! Why is the connection so slow!?”

Him:       “I’m going to turn down this street… what was the address again??”

Me:        “Um… I think it was… 432 Mulberry… I think… Don’t we have a paper map in this truck???”

Him:       “I didn’t see one. Maybe I can get the address on my phone.”

Me:        “Wait, is that a cop up ahead? I think he’s at the call, drive up there.”

Cop:       “Hey! What took you guys so long!?”

Ain’t modern technology great?

It was only a few years ago that we got GPS machines in the ambulances I ran in. Previous to that we had survived off of our “Stacy Maps” which were these awesome map books designed by a local company. They weren’t sexy or technologically sufficient for the times… but they always got the job done if you knew how to use them. Sure, they were hard to read by yourself if you were the only one navigating the truck, but they worked… every time. No outside force could stop them from working. If you had one, you weren’t lost, period.

Now, with our increasing reliance on the magic voice in the GPS box (I call my GPS voice Ms. Kitty) we seem to be able to get to our calls seamlessly and smoothly… 90% of the time. There are times when the GPS doesn’t work, times when it’s just too darn slow, and times when it doesn’t have an address to lock in to. The GPS just isn’t always optimized for emergency response. I’ve found that my GPS is great when I am dispatched to 9933 Harrison St as a physical address… but not so much when I’m dispatched to “The bike path in the field behind Costco off of the side road next to the blue house”.

I remember a call I got once when I was working a relief shift at a contracted rural station. We had just cleared a call from a downtown hospital when the service got a call for a nasty auto wreck out in the country. Their dispatch asked us to respond as the third ambulance. I usually worked in the city the hospital was in so I knew how bad the regular routes were clogged with construction, being as it was summer in the Midwest. I drove and was able to use my knowledge of the city to get us around every bit of it. I took State St to Prospect, Prospect to Guilford, Guilford to Highcrest, Highcrest to Springcreek, Springcreek to Springbrook, Springbrook to Perryville, to… well, you get the idea. I was able to bob and weave through that city so much that we arrived at the scene in record time… which was just in time to be cancelled and sent back to quarters.

What I’m saying is that I knew the city so well because I had been forced to learn how to navigate it by reading paper maps. A skill that sadly, I’m afraid we’re losing as we increase our reliance on the magic directional box and the voices inside of it. GPS is a great tool, but since a huge part of our effectiveness as EMS people is actually being able to arrive at an address in a timely manner, it can’t be our only tool to find one. If you're relying on your GPS as the only tool you have to find the address of an emergency call, you're turning your GPS machine into a life-safety device. I'm sure the manufacturer will agree that It was never intended to be one of those.

My advice is to learn to love your paper maps. Read them. Study them as much as you study your medical protocols. Drive around your wider response area without turning on your GPS. Get lost in it every now and then and try to find your way around. Be sure to pay attention to the hundred blocks, the street names, and the short cuts. Don’t become clueless when Ms. Kitty takes a coffee break.

———————————————————————-

For more of my “You Kids Get Off My Lawn!!” ramblings, you may want to check out “Those Darn Kids!”

Posted by on October 26, 2011 • Filed under: 911 fail, Command & Leadership, Emergency Medical Services, EMS, ems education, EMS Health & Safety, EMS Humor, EMS Management, EMS Topics, EMS training, Fire Rescue Topics, Paramedic, paramedic education, stories, Technology & Communications, technology-communications-ems-topics, Training & Development, training-fire-rescue-topics

The Houston Medicare Problem – Formulating Better Instructions on Paying for EMS

1 comment

I’ll admit it. I’m kind of a nerd with Microsoft Excel.

I don’t have the programming skills needed for other database programs and I’m only taking baby-steps in MS Access, but with Excel I’m pretty darn good at making it do cool things. I think Excel is widely underused for being as powerful of a data analysis tool as it is. It’s one of those programs that everybody knows how to use… but nobody *knows* how to use. People learn parts of it and are able to do the kind of work that they do in it without touching the thousands of other tools that it offers them. It’s an insanely powerful system.

I use Excel quite a lot in my various jobs for data aggregation and analysis. Lots of my coworkers do too. Since most everyone knows that I’m an Excel nerd, some people ask me to help troubleshoot their spreadsheets for them. Some problems are quick fixes while others are maddeningly complex. Most problems, however, seem to have a common theme:

Computers always do what we TELL them to do but not necessarily what we WANT them to do.

Computers run programs. They don’t think for themselves. They don’t make their own instructions. They simply look at a list of instructions and run them. They don’t judge the instructions for merit, correctness, or morality (See: 99.9999% of the internet), they just do what they’re told without being able to think about it. When computers appear to be thinking, they’re simply running complex programs with multiple variables. Excel is no different. In fact, excel is very good at doing exactly what we tell it to do with no regard to what we may want it to do.

I sometimes agonize for hours on Excel problems when I can’t get my numbers to add up correctly. Usually these problems involve complex groups of numbers where I know the answers for a certain part of the problem, but want to use Excel to contain and crunch numbers for the parts I don’t know. I’ll write my calculations on what I know already to prove my theory, and then use those theories to expand the spreadsheet. Sometimes the formulas work the first time… and sometimes they don’t. When fixing the problems I have to keep reminding myself that Excel is doing exactly what I told it to do, not what I’m thinking I want it to do. If it’s giving me the wrong answer, it’s because I asked it the wrong question or gave it bad instructions on how to arrive at the answer. It can’t do anything but that.

I use Excel as a metaphor for a lot of systems in life. To be sure, humans have free will (we think) and are very complex in both our actions and motivations, but on the larger scale our systems affect our behaviors in predictable patterns. Just like we predictably follow the lines on the highway when we’re driving most of the time, with the outliers among us creating a need for EMS, our systems affect us predictably. Small changes to the systems we operate within can cause big changes to our behaviors on the large scale. Think of a small change to the width of a highway traffic lane causing more or less accidents, or daylight savings time creating savings in energy costs overall. While there will always be outliers when dealing with humans… the systems we create are instructions that society is given. Society will follow those instructions for both the benefit and detriment of our goals. The overall system will do just what Excel does, by doing what we tell it to do and not necessarily doing what we wanted it to do when we created it.

This Headline out of The Houston Chronicle made me think of this. Take a look at it:

“Private ambulances take Medicare, taxpayers for a ride – Companies make millions off the poor, vulnerable – whether passengers need services or not”

I want you to read the article when you have time (it’s a long one – here’s the link) but the salient point they assert is that unscrupulous private EMS organizations, in near criminal collaboration with the operators of unscrupulous “healthcare” organizations, are bilking Medicare for millions via unnecessary ambulance transports. According to the pretty well-written article there does indeed seem to be a problem. While I don’t like the fact that in my opinion, the article unfairly vilifies some of these ambulance services and shows a bias against private EMS providers as a whole, I can’t say if it’s my own stated bias as a proponent of well-ran private EMS that’s causing me to feel that way. However, even the headline “Private ambulance services take Medicare, taxpayers for a ride” shows a bias. My thought is that the headline should read “Medicare Rules allow people to take advantage of the system although most don’t” but I digress…

I would like you to look at the headline of an article I wrote recently that JEMS.com published as my April column, it reads:

“Medic Suggests Reimbursement Change – A different payment model helps EMS & Medicare”

In his article which includes references to Barbecue, I talk about the Medicare reimbursement rules as well, but from a different perspective. (Here’s the link if you haven’t read it). I offer a solution on how a small change to the Medicare rules (think: the instructions) could benefit all involved.

I think that the two extremes here show a poignant contrast. One extreme shows how the Medicare system can be abused due to its rules allowing for abuse and the other shows how the system can disallow beneficial services because of those same rules. It is a good example of how just like excel, the system does what we tell it to do rather than what we want it to do. Other than some unscrupulous people out there, nobody wants patients or ambulance services (*ahem* Private or otherwise) to be able to take advantage and get money in a way that is unfair to the rest of the system. However, I think there are few people out there that would rally against the change that I propose in my article. This is simply a case of the end result being a product of system design. Medicare, like any system, is a set of instructions that produce an end result. The instructions allow for the ambulance services in Texas to bilk the system in compliance with the rules while a different section of those same instructions disallow payment for treating and releasing patients who could clearly benefit. It’s simply a matter of the Medicare system producing results based upon the instructions it’s been given. In both cases, the system isn’t making a judgment, it’s just following the instructions it’s been given. There is no moral value assigned within the system.

Small, efficient changes need to be made here. Just like when troubleshooting an excel spreadsheet the smallest error in a formula can skew the whole result. The companies mentioned in the Houston article aren’t the product of private EMS being evil they’re the unintended result of a system that needs better instructions to act upon. The system is producing what we’ve told it to produce, not what we want it to. These problems wouldn’t exist if we would tweak the parameters of the system to disallow them.

So… what we need are some better instructions. Anyone got any ideas?

Here’s the link to the Houston Chronicle article again

Here’s the link to mine

Also, for more of my column on JEMS.com, here’s my page there with all of my articles listed.

Posted by on October 24, 2011 • Filed under: Administration & Leadership, Command & Leadership, Economics, Emergency Medical Services, EMS Management, EMS Topics, News, newspaper, Paramedic, politics

Get a Pulse, Get a Steak? Random Incentive

2 comments

Tonight the girlfriend and I had the rare opportunity to go out on an actual date. It's getting increasingly rare these days that we have time to do so, what with our schedules, work stuff, and my recent bit of travelling for the other job that I have. It was nice to actually get out, go to a restaurant, and not have to cook or eat bad-for-me fast food on the road.

She and I went to one of our favorite places, a midwestern type joint that specializes in mass quantities of beef. At this place you get to choose a large hunk of absolutely beautiful red meat from their cooler, season it to your liking with the wide variety of spices they have on hand, and then grill it yourself over their huge charcol grill while people bring you your beer. It is a concept that is admittedly getting a little more rare around the midwest, but it's certainly something that I haven't seen anywhere else in the country that I've been. These people have given their customers exactly what they want. All the beef one could possibly eat, a salad bar to go with it, cheap drinks, and a good meal will cost you about $17 bux. Yeah, beat that, California.

I noticed on the menu that the restaurant offers gift cards that employers can give their employees. They are good for a full meal for two and come personalized for the employer. Since I'm always on the lookout for a good way to help reward and motivate good EMS people, I mentioned to the GF that maybe I should buy a couple to give the guys as an occasional "attaboy".

"What would you give them out for?" She asked, then answered "How about every time they resuscitate a code?"

Now THAT is a good idea! I'll call it the "Get a Pulse, Get a Steak" incentive program. That way, every time a crew gets that magical cardiac arrest save they and their significant other get to celebrate by roasting them some posthumous cow. It sure beats knowing that all you've got to look forward to is a lengthy report and a horribly messy ambulance or scene to clean up afterward.

Then again, I'm sure someone will point out that it's just too subjective to base the reward on a code save because as we all know, even when everything is done completely "right", completely by the book, and the crew tries absolutely as hard as they can to get the save it still doesn't usually turn out the way we'd like it to. We all know that is true. It just seemed like a good idea at the time.

Thanks for shooting down my awesome idea, imaginary naysayer.

I've been trying to come up with some innovative ways to motivate, reward, and incentivise the best and brightest EMS people out there to want to come in and do the absolute best job they can for the service and the patients every day over the long term. Money and passion isn't enough to carry everyone along every day, people need more than that sometimes and there's simply no shame in it because we all feel that way at times.

I'd love to hear what you or your service is doing to motivate employees. (And don't tell me it's what they're doing in Louisville, because yeah… not cool)

Also, the steak was amazing.

Posted by on October 14, 2011 • Filed under: Administration & Leadership, appreciation, Command & Leadership, Emergency Medical Services, EMS, EMS Health & Safety, EMS Management, EMS Motivation, EMS Topics, EMT, Paramedic

Perils of Paramedics Pursing imProper Patient Refusals

7 comments

Inspector General Faults DC Paramedic’s Response to ‘Acid Reflux’ Case

This article comes to us from JEMS.com which has a link to the full article over at The Washington Times. It’s not necessary to read both articles, but since JEMS originally called it to my attention it’s only fair to link the boys over there first. Read the full article, please… I want to see if you feel the same way about it that I do.

Ok, ya back? Good.

In this case that is very reminiscent of the case law I wrote about last year in “EMS Case Law – AMA Refusals, Death, and Documentation” – A DCFD EMS paramedic obtained a signed refusal from a patient who called 911 for chest pain. According to the < sarcasm> stellar, just friggin’ stellar < /sarcasm> journalism employed in the story by the reporter (I mean seriously, can any reporter anywhere ever write a story about EMS that doesn’t sound like a 5 year old’s understanding of Mozart?) the Evil paramedic did bad things that caused someone to die.

And, well… Here are some quotes from the piece, although I still think you should read the whole thing:

“The crew found Givens, 39, on the floor of his home after his mother called 911 — “an indication that he may have experienced something more serious than what was later described as simple acid reflux,” the report says.

Although they asked Givens multiple times whether he wanted to be taken to a hospital and he declined, the report suggests responders should have done more to persuade him to go.”

So they find some guy, a 38yo guy, a young guy who lives with his mother (maybe) laying on the floor probably being all dramatic and stuff… I’m sure he was all like “Ow. My chest hurts” and the medics were all like “Dude, we have a low index of suspicion for your condition being cardiac related due to the fact that you’re young and don’t appear to have many risk factors” n’ stuff.

Or something like that. At any rate, I’m sure they were less concerned about this guy than they would have been with say, a middle-aged male with classic STEMI (heart attack) symptoms. Yes, they signed him off AMA while telling him to take Pepto-Bismol, and yes… the article does indeed say this:

“The inspector general’s report also faults emergency workers for not recording fundamental information, such as Givens’ first name, age and medical history and interactions with his family members on a patient care report. The reports are typically passed on to hospital personnel when a patient is taken to a hospital but are considered necessary even in cases in which a patient is not taken to a hospital to provide medical and legal documentation of responder’s actions.”

But that doesn’t mean that they just plain didn’t care about the guy and were encouraging the refusal, right?

“When Givens asked one of the four emergency workers who responded if he needed to go to the hospital, the responder replied, “That’s up to you; if you want to go we will take you,” according to the report.”

Yea… I’m just going to come out and say that the only time I ever use that line is at 0330hrs when I’ve been called out for a stubbed toe in the winter time and I am actively encouraging the AMA.

But this can’t be a systemic problem with the whole administration of the DC Fire Department EMS division, can it? I mean… that’s one of the nation’s busiest fire-based EMS providers and I’m sure they care a great deal about EMS and give it the full attention it deserves.

“A 2009 investigation by The Washington Times into the training and education of the District’s paramedics found many could not pass basic written exams testing their medical knowledge or that they mishandled basic life-saving procedures during videotaped assessments.

The test results of the paramedic who treated Givens were among those criticized by experts in the report by The Times, and the lawsuit filed by the Givens family accuses the fire department of being aware of the paramedic’s “poor performance” but leaving him in the field.”

Um… but that was in 2009! And I’m sure that the DC Fire Department EMS Division has progressed greatly in improving their EMS care and service delivery, right?

DC BLS Ambulances out of service as Hot Weather Arrives

<sigh>

I will admit, there isn't enough information or proof here to make a decision on due to the *amazing* clarity of the reporting here. I'll admit that I read between the lines when I made my judgement and then pulled back from my original thoughts. Then again, it does seem like my worries about this case are correct… I don't know exactly what the truth is, but I'm guessing it's not favorable for DC Fire EMS.

Excuse me, I mean "FEMS."

<sigh>

—————————————————————————–

Have you ever read my post on the ultimate, most off-limits “no go” topic in EMS blogging? It might tick you off as well.

 

Posted by on June 17, 2011 • Filed under: Administration & Leadership, Case law, Command & Leadership, Emergency Medical Services, EMS, EMS Management, EMS rant, ems report, EMS Topics, everyday ems ethics, Fire Rescue Topics, Paramedic, training-fire-rescue-topics

From the #WTF files – AL Fire Chief Flushes Twins down the Toilet?

7 comments

Holy crap! Read this: Odenville, AL Fire Chief Terminated  FireLawBlog.com

Did I read that correctly? Did a Fire Chief really FLUSH TWO STILLBORN TWINS DOWN A TOILET!?

No way, that's gotta be a hoax… I mean, that can't happen, right? Please tell me that nobody is that stupid. Please restore at least a little of my faith in humanity…

Nobody? <sigh>

FireLawBlog.com's story on this has a link to the St. Clair Times article on the subject, and it looks like there's a lot more to this story than has been reported. The comments on the article are pretty telling… although I still have very little idea on what actually went on here. At face value, I can't see any possible reason that this would have happened. I just don't understand. Maybe if she miscarried into the commode maybe? I suppose they *could* have missed them… right?

Eww.

Also, the former chief defended himself with this cryptic statement, which I've seen repeated three times in various articles on the story:

"There were two of us there, and we followed protocol,” Davis said. “We followed the state protocol issued by the medic who was in charge at the scene.”

Soooo… Um… The medic… issues state protocol? and he/she ordered this? Aaaannnd… I'm sorry I just don't understand the statement. Maybe it's a bad quote, I don't know.

Anyway, here's the followup story. I just thought I'd call it to your attention.

http://firelawblog.com/2011/06/alabama-fire-chief-sued-over-disposal-of-stillborn-twins/

 

 

Posted by on June 8, 2011 • Filed under: Administration & Leadership, Command & Leadership, Emergency Medical Services, EMS Management, EMS Topics, Fire Rescue Topics, News, Paramedic

We Oughta Look In to This – EMS 2.0

3 comments

It looks like something has been right under our noses all this time, and I think that it just might be looking into.

Mobile Doctors: Http://www.MobileDoctors.com

Yep, you read that website address correctly, and yes, it really is a group of Primary Care and other physicians that make house calls their business. In fact, according to their website, they make around 5000 house calls PER MONTH in the Chicago, Detroit, Indianapolis, and Phoenix areas. The website also says they’ve been around since 1996.

I came across this ad today as I was surfing around and I was curious enough to click on it. I read their website with some interest, and their claims started sounding awful familiar to me. If you’ve been following the EMS 2.0 and Community Paramedicine movements, you’re probably familiar with what they say as well. It’s pretty much what we’ve been talking about. Read this:

“Our team of healthcare professionals specializes in chronic disease management and care plan development. This results in a significant reduction of emergency room, hospital and nursing home admissions for our patients.”

Also, this:

“Our practice focuses on primary care/internal medicine, podiatry, and diagnostic testing. Our goal is to provide high quality, responsive in-home health care to stabilize patients, improve their health, manage their medications, and reduce hospitalizations and ER visits. We also coordinate patient care with home health agencies, durable medical equipment providers, hospitals, and other medical professionals.”

Huh.

Those two short paragraphs in their static, online brochure of a website are quite obviously advertisements for the services they provide… but aren’t those the things we’ve been saying with the whole EMS 2.0 thing? Isn’t that what we want to do? To expand our service offerings and reduce inappropriate use of emergency healthcare while increasing overall wellness through primary care, that’s the point of it all, right?

Well here’s a company, albeit very much a physician driven company, that’s been making their living off of doing just that since 1996. In addition, they take Medicare.

I think that there’s something we can learn from this company and their business model. It’s worth a look at their website: Http://www.MobileDoctors.com. Sometime in the near future I plan on contacting them and asking them about how their company can interface with EMS.

Till then, take a look at these two posts and see what you think:

Primary Care Paramedics? I think it’s time

Are We the Gatekeepers to the Emergency Healthcare System? EMS 2.0

Posted by on June 8, 2011 • Filed under: Ambulance, Emergency Medical Services, EMS, ems 2.0, EMS Management, EMS Topics, Paramedic, physician, politics, Uncategorized

Wake Up! You may have a call…

2 comments

Every so often the discussion of the most healthy and appropriate way to wake a sleeping firefighter or EMS person from their slumber in order to alert them to the presence of a call for service crops up in the national discourse. Some believe that soft, gradiated lighting combined with a soothing tone and soft-voices is best for the long-term cardiovascular health of EMTs, Firefighters, and Paramedics. They say that a quick wake up to a jarring alarm tone is unhealthy and can cause long-term damage through a rapid increase in heart-rate and blood pressure.

I think it's BS, actually. I can't seem to get up without the assistance of Gabrial's trumpet, a car battery, and some alligator clips… and even then, I have woken up more than once in the middle of a call, coming to fully-realized alertness in the act of performing CPR or decompressing someone's chest. I think that that's way more startling. Also, our night dispatcher has a voice that would be very well suited to that of a 900-number call-taker and isn't the kind of voice that tends to make a guy want to get *out* of bed. ("Tell me more about the fire, Dave!")

While searching the world's most accurate source of information, the internet, I came across this invention. I love it. I may try and buy the rights to it and sell it to ambulance agencies such as mine.

Here, see for yourself!

In addition, I think this would be an awesome way to get the crews to do their shift chores. The supervisor of the day would keep the machines on until the garbage cans were emptied, the floors were mopped, the toilets were clean, and the training was trained.

I think it's a potential gold mine.

Posted by on May 23, 2011 • Filed under: Administration & Leadership, Emergency Medical Services, EMS, EMS Health & Safety, EMS Humor, EMS Management, EMS Motivation, EMS safety, EMS Topics, Fire department, Fire Rescue Topics, Firefighter Safety & Health, funny, Paramedic, Videos

Change Medicare? Save EMS

9 comments

I’ve said this before, and I’ll continue to say it until I can do something about it: The Fee-For-Transport model has failed EMS. We have to change it and we have to change it soon.

In fact, I believe that the entire revenue model we use for our industry has failed. I think that the “Fee for Transport” model employed by the Emergency Medical Services industry is flawed, archaic, outdated, and is not conducive for the development of our profession. I think it stifles growth and development. I think that it is unfair to make this inequity up through local property taxes.

I think it has to change.

Don’t know what I’m talking about? Let’s hear what Medicare has to say on the subject:

“The Medicare ambulance benefit is a transportation benefit and without a transport there is no payable service. When multiple ground and/or air ambulance providers/suppliers respond, payment may be made only to the ambulance provider/supplier that actually furnishes the transport.” (https://www.cms.gov/manuals/Downloads/bp102c10.pdf)

Yes, that’s what that means: Medicare sees EMS solely as a “transport provider.”

Basically Medicare is saying that all they’re going to pay for is taxi service. Sure, they’ll reimburse some other expenses, but without the taxi component, they’re not picking up the tab. They’re certainly not going to pay for you to provide medical care for one of their clients on a scene. They’re not going to pay you for sweetening up an unresponsive diabetic and leaving them at their house, they’re not going to pay you for providing Community Paramedicine, and they’re certainly not going to pay you for other home health or primary care services. To them, we’re a medical transport industry. They pay for transportation and that’s it. Sure, they make a differentiation between “Emergency” transportation and “Non-Emergency Transportation” and use the term “skilled medical treatment” for some of the things done in the back of our rigs, but that whole “transportation” thing is always there. No transport, no payment. It’s as simple as that.

This very appropriate image was sent in to me by Matthew Rausenberg while I was writing this post. Thanks Matt!

Not sure about that? Well, here’s more reading on what Medicare WILL and WILL NOT pay for in this informative booklet that I just printed out for every EMT at my service to read:

That’s the link to the “Official Government Booklet” that explains:

  • “When Medicare Helps Cover Ambulance Services”
  • “What Medicare Pays”
  • “What You (the patient) Pay”
  • “What to do if Medicare Doesn’t Cover Your Ambulance Service”

I’ll admit, this is pretty light reading by government standards, but it’s important for all of us in the profession to read, understand, and know this stuff. Sure, I know that some of you out there are going to fall back on our old standby statement that “I’m not in this for the money, I just want to help people” or some other platitude just like that, and I understand and appreciate your altruistic motivations… but I will tell you that EMS needs money to operate. Whether you’re a volunteer or a full-time paid employee, your ambulance service needs money to function. Paid employees need to make a living, ambulances need fuel, stations need heat, equipment needs to be replaced, and communities need 24-hour ambulance coverage to meet both their emergency and non-emergency needs. Ambulance services are critical for any community, no matter their capacity, and all of that stuff takes money. Medicare, through the “Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Serivices” (CMS) sets the tone for the entire healthcare payment industry and by default they have become responsible for propping up a majority of ambulance services through providing the lion’s share of their total revenue in some areas. They’re the big dogs in the healthcare payment arena… and they’re holding us back.

Not that I’m solely picking on Medicare here… but let’s read further into their definitions, shall we? (From the second document I linked to above):

“Emergency ambulance transportation

Emergency ambulance transportation is provided after you’ve had a sudden medical emergency, when your health is in serious danger, and when every second counts to prevent your health from getting worse. The following are examples of when Medicare might cover emergency ambulance transportation:

  • You’re in severe pain, bleeding, in shock, or unconscious.
  • You need oxygen or other skilled medical treatment during transportation.
  • You need to be restrained to keep you from hurting yourself or others.

These are only examples. Medicare coverage depends on the seriousness of your medical condition and whether you could have been safely transported by other means.”

Clearly, Medicare thinks that only “Skilled Medical Care” provided whilst tires are rotating under a patient is valuable. They pay no attention to the fact that there are better and cheaper alternatives out there that our profession could offer them. I know that Medicare represents taxpayers and the payments they give out are tax dollars, and I appreciate and want them to be responsible with those tax dollars…

I just don’t think that they are.

Medicare has determined that the only way they can be responsible with our tax money is to deny as many payments as possible and to only pay for the bare minimum that they feel is important. That’s why ambulance services are “Transportation providers” in their eyes. However, this ignores so much potential in cost savings in my opinion. They pay no attention to the fact that while it’s nice that they pay for “Wait-and-return” ambulance transfers to and from nursing homes and clinics, those services could be provided in a lot of cases by paramedics who could take care of the patient’s needs on site and save them a ton of money by offering the new service. They ignore the fact that if they provided a $250-$300 benefit for an ambulance to come, fully assess, treat an unresponsive hypoglycemic diabetic, and then release them safely without transport, they could avoid the (estimated) $500 transport bill and subsequent $1000 ER bill. The savings are potentially enormous… and there are a ton of ideas like that waiting to be explored.

We, as a profession, just have to convince them that these ideas are worth being explored.

The healthcare payment system shapes healthcare.  It certainly has shaped the way we operate in EMS. The pressure to do only what we’re going to get paid to do is so prevalent a force in the industry that it is almost the very foundation of what we do and how we’ve evolved. The payment system didn’t evolve to meet our potential; EMS has evolved to fit its limiting influence. This is why we do the BLS transfers that cost too much for too little benefit. This is why new products that can’t be reimbursed aren’t making their way into the hands of field providers. This is why treatment modalities aren’t expanding as fast as in other areas of medicine. The CMS fee schedule dictates all of this.

And we as a profession have to change it.

Imagine what EMS would be today if we could bill for any service we thought provided benefit to our patients and our communities? To be sure, this would cause some “waste, fraud, and abuse” in the initial phases… but that exists in today’s system. Could you imagine if Community Paramedicine was fully reimbursed? Can you imagine that if instead of providing a wait-and-return BLS transport for a nursing home patient needing a surgical wound re-check, you came, assessed, took some pictures on a cell phone camera and sent it to the physician wirelessly? Can you imagine if you could charge for responding, assessing a patient with a minor medical complaint, and then having the patient transported to an urgent care center that would continue your care? Can you imagine how different everything we do could be?

Well, at least I can start to imagine. I see additional revenue streams that would come into our industry and improve the profession, strengthen our patient care, and save the healthcare system a boatload of money while improving access to primary healthcare. I see paramedics and EMTs not being taxi drivers. I see a real career and a bigger impact upon the overall health of our communities. I see more fiscal responsibility. I see lots of great potential.

And I don’t know how to do this yet, but maybe somewhere, someone reading this might have an idea.

Do you?

————————————————-

I’ve written on this before, and maybe you’d be interested in reading some of those ideas:

“What is the next ‘Low Hanging Fruit’ of EMS 2.0 and US Healthcare Reform?”

And to look at a real-life example of how our British brethren are handling this issue and are having success across the pond:

“A Shoutout Across the pond to our British Brethren”

Posted by on March 17, 2011 • Filed under: Administration & Leadership, change, EMS, ems 2.0, EMS Management, EMS Topics, Funding & Staffing, new perspective, Paramedic, paramedic salary, politics, potential, profession, Uncategorized, universal healthcare, US economy

Lazy EMS – Encouraging the RMA

17 comments

I had an EMT friend call me the other day with a problem she’s having at work. After listening to her and being less than helpful, I thought that I’d share this with you and see what you’d all have to say about it. I’ll give you my advice to her, but I didn’t honestly have all that good of advice to give her. Let’s see what you think.

My friend who we’ll call her “Ann” even though that may or may not be her real name, is a former partner of mine. She’s a cool girl. She’s as much of the caring, kind, and competent EMT as you’d ever want in a partner and she’s also pretty fun to work with. I liked working with her and was sad to see her move away. I was happy for her when she got this BLS 911/Transfer job on a “big city” ambulance service, but she’s had some troubles there. Now, I’ve worked with her for a year as one of my regular partners and I know she’s good at what she does. I also know that the reputations of all of the ambulance services in this “Big City” aren’t all that stellar. Frankly, I’d take her word over theirs if I was pressed to answer a about it. 

She called me and asked my opinion on what she should do about a situation that’s developing with a new partner of hers up there in the big city. She explained that this guy is a know-it-all type who encourages RMA’s (refusals, Against-Medical-Advice, etc) on almost every patient. She says that he won’t touch anything unless it’s a true emergency and tries to dissuade every patient who he feels is beneath wasting his valuable BLS time on. She says that it’s reckless and that he does it to excess, even when it’s clearly not in the patient’s best interest in her opinion. She says that he rationalizes it by saying that the patients won’t pay their bills anyway, and that some of these patients are simply being a burden on the system in general and that he’s just doing his job.

And I can understand that… to a point. I mean, who among us has ever rolled their eyes as a drama-filled patient tries to overplay their conditions to get sympathy and a transport or simply doesn’t even try and expects a free ride to three hots and a cot… I get that. In fact, I see it all the time. It bothers me to no end… and yet I rarely, if ever, encourage an RMA.

Ahhh, this is SO much better than doing a report

In fact, there are only certain times that I ever will encourage a refusal… and that is when there is a clear benefit to the patient not be transported to an ER via ambulance. I will do this at times when the patient will be better served by something like an urgent care center, or by a quick trip to their primary care doctor. I’ll show up, provide a full and detailed assessment, and actually talk to the patient about their options for medical care. I’ll tell them that maybe the stitches they need would be done faster and cheaper at the Urgent care down the street than at the ER, or that their need for a simple x-ray or throat culture could be handled somewhere else. I’ll even tell them when I think they can save money and still be safe by being transported to the ER via private car rather than by my ambulance. I feel comfortable doing that when it’s clearly in the PATIENT’S best interest – NEVER when it’s in MY best interest. Even then, if the patient still wants to go via ambulance to an ER or is unsure that my option is the best option for them I transport them without complaint. It’s just safer for my career to do that. Ultimately, I’m not a physician and I can’t make the final legal determination on what’s best. Only the patient or a physician can do that and I am usually not the patient.

However, that’s not what Ann says this new partner of hers is doing. She says that he tries to defer every transport on the grounds that he’s lazy and then he writes very sloppy reports about the calls he refuses. She says that he’s been in trouble for this before and that while he was working at another service, he was actually almost terminated for this behavior.

I know the type of EMT he is… He’s the “So, do you want to be transported or what?” kind of EMT. The kind of EMS person who feels that he or she doesn’t ever respond to “Check someone out” and that only the patients that absolutely have to be transported to an ER for an “awesome” enough medical complaint are truly worth their time.

I hate those kinds of EMTs.

She is concerned for her job, her license, and her career while she works with this guy. She doesn’t want his bad behavior to get her roped into a complaint, lawsuit, or worse… she wanted to know if there was a way she could protect herself legally from his actions while she was working with him.

I went with my stock answer on this. Being an EMS supervisor myself, I asked her if she’d talked to her superiors about this. She said she had done just that, and it hadn’t gotten anywhere.

I wasn’t surprised.

Unfortunately for my friend, there’s just no reasoning with this kind of EMT. I’ve worked with their kind before and I know how painful one’s working relationship with these people can get when you force them to *gasp* do their jobs and take people places while treating them for whatever they say their medical complaint is. They tend to get growly at you when you tell them you’re having trouble hearing them over the sound of you not caring what they think. It makes lunch time a tenuous situation and totally ruins the Christmas party.

My next pearl of advice to her was to tell her to actually send a written letter to her supervisors, detailing her complaints and stating her concerns in writing. My thoughts would be that then, there would be a paper trail that shows she at least tried to do something about it. Unfortunately, I also had to warn her that it may end up branding her as a trouble-maker when the bosses realize that they now have a paper trail too, only they actually have to do something about it. They may retaliate against her instead.

Then I told her to CC a copy of the letter to the medical director, just for emphasis. It’s because I’m a devious trouble-maker myself.

Situations like this are all too common out there and they are the things that hold our profession back. Yes, I know that there are system abusers out there in patientville. We’re not going to fix that with our current system and really need to get more options out there for appropriate treatment pathways. However, putting people at risk by encouraging RMAs because you’re a lazy provider hurts our efforts by setting a bad precedent. Please don’t do this people. Take it from me. I’d never let you get away with it on my shift.

Does anyone else have any better advice for my friend Ann?

——————————————————————–

Also, it may be helpful to read this post: a primer on the people I call “Grumblemedics”

Posted by on January 30, 2011 • Filed under: Administration & Leadership, Command & Leadership, Emergency Medical Services, EMS, EMS ethics, EMS Management, EMS Topics, EMT, everyday ems ethics, grumblemedics, medical ethics

A Shoutout Across the Pond to our British EMS Bretheren

6 comments

Mark in his British Paramedic Uniform

If you don’t know Mark Glencorse by now, you’re either very new to the EMS blogosphere or have been living under a rock. In addition to being a fine paramedic by all accounts, Mark runs the EMS blog www.999medic.com which is a member of the www.FireEMSblogs.com family of which I also am a member. Mark has a comfortable, familiar style of writing that brings you right there next to him as you read his articles. It’s almost like you’re running the calls with him, experiencing the joys and pain of a British Paramedic as he experiences them himself. He’s one of my Best Blogger Buddies and I’m proud that I can call him a friend. I read most everything he writes.

I hadn’t been to his blog for a few days though and thought that today would be a good time to catch up on what he’s been writing. He’s got some good stuff up lately, but in addition to some of his more educational articles, I found some things that just floored me.

We here in the United States can learn quite a bit from our brethren across the pond. They have aspects to their system that could be very valuable for us here in the states. Their EMS system is similar to ours in a lot of ways, not the least of which is the fact that they respond to largely the same types of calls that we do, but is also vastly different in terms of initial education, pay, respect, and capabilities.

I’m going to explore three of his recent posts here and see if other fellow US paramedics and EMTs will be just as floored as I was. Here goes:

“The Clash of the Assessments” – 999medic.com

This post explores some friction that he and his fellow paramedics have been having with “Walk In Centers” (WICs) that have sprouted up all over his country. He describes these clinics as such:

“In the UK over the last few years, we have seen hundreds of NHS Walk in Centres (WIC) sprout up around the country. These are primarily Nurse led units that are placed strategically in various towns and cities to provide care for those residents who are suffering from either minor injury or illness. They most definitely have a place in the wider primary health care environment, but ask any Medic what they think of them, and most will tell stories of picking up patients from the Walk In Centre to take up to the Accident and Emergency department who clearly do not have any specific life threatening or emergent need, and who, in the paramedics opinion should have been treat and discharged from the Walk in Centre.”

This sounds pretty familiar to me. Here in the US we have plenty of Urgent Care Centers that have sprouted up all over the American Healthcare landscape. They are staffed sometimes by a Physician, but are largely staffed by Physicians’ Assistants (PA-Cs) and Nurse Practitioners (ARNPs). They handle minor medical complaints and urgent-but-not-emergent medical conditions. Most of these centers are perfectly adequate for treating most patients with day-to-day illnesses and minor injuries. They cost much less than an emergency room visit and help save the ER from having to handle all of these minor cases. I fully support urgent care centers and their use in the spectrum of healthcare. However, my fellow medics and I can all point to times where we’ve responded to urgent care centers for complaints that we did not believe to warrant an emergency response and subsequent transport. I can emphasize with Mark and his coworkers about their problem with these kinds of transports.

Here’s what Mark describes as the “Rant” he’s trying not to have:

“My service has direct referral pathways to the Walk in Centres. If I have a patient who I think fits the fairly strict criteria for assessment and treatment at a WIC, then I can contact one of the nurse partitioners on the phone and discuss my patient so that they know what I am bringing in and more importantly that they know they are suitable for their level of care and will not need to be shipped out to the A&E department at a later time.”

Wait… What?

“My service has direct referral pathways to the Walk In Centres”

Dude!! We have been practically begging for that here in the US for some time! That’s AWESOME that the British can do that! Alternate treatment and transport pathways are one of the cornerstone ideas for EMS 2.0. This practice would save a great deal of healthcare dollars, would lessen the burden on the overcrowded ERs, would be remarkably more convenient for the patient, and would help keep the ERs available for the more serious of illnesses and injuries. This is a slam-dunk that we here in the US just can’t seem to figure out for ourselves and here we see the program is already active in the UK. We should steal that data and use it to help justify our own programs.

The next two articles I’m going to explore are pretty entertaining. Mark was selected to ride along in a multi-disciplinary unit of both civilian and military police officers in a busy urban center that has been having problems with alcohol and young people trying to mix too often. The set-up is pretty cool. He rides around with the police officers, helps them with what he is able to help them with, and is available to handle any medical problems that might arise with a 2 to 3 minute response time. The program sounds great, actually and I think that it could probably be employed with some success in many areas of the US… but read this account of his first EMS call while with the PD:

Mark (Right) with the rest of the British Team

“Less than a minute later, a police van turns up outside of a bar, the side door slides open, and out jumps a paramedic!” (Apparently it’s novel for the Police to be around with the Paramedics there)

“After a few quizzical looks, I get on with doing my usual job and assess the patient. He has a small cut to his forehead where someone punched him whilst wearing a ring. It is a minor wound but will need either stiching or gluing. There was no loss of consciousness, he has no other apparent injury and his observations are fine. Its still early in the night and he has only had a couple of drinks and doesn’t appear intoxicated.”

Man… so the patient is drunk and has a head injury… All you US paramedics know what that means. Here comes an ambulance in to transport the patient to the hospital. He can’t refuse because of the ETOH on board coupled with the head injury, and you know you don’t want to be sued… Let’s see what Mark did:

“I advise him that he needs to be assessed at the local hospital so that the wound can be closed. After dressing his forehead, he promptly jumps into a waiting taxi and heads off to the hospital less than 10 minutes away. I complete my paper work, Dave completes his log and we are off again.”

“From time of call to patient leaving scene – 8 minutes!”

WHAT!? OH COME ON NOW! That’s just not fair! You mean to tell me that Mark was able to use his clinical judgment, assess the guy for his injuries, and make a common-sense treatment and transport decision? He put the guy in a Taxi??

That would be a potentially career-ending move for a US paramedic. The Brits do it regularly. Could you just imagine what the ability to make those kind of decisions would mean for the US EMS system? Could you just Imagine what that would mean for EMS 2.0?

Let’s see what happens with the next patient encounter he describes:

“As we are sitting outside one of the shops, Dave hears one of the door staff calling for police assistance. He has been assaulted and has a head injury.”

“Again we are on scene in less than two minutes. This time the wound is a bit worse and is still freely bleeding. A dressing, some direct pressure and a quick assessment later and he is sitting next to me in the back of the police van whilst we drive him the short 5 minute journey to the local hospital. Again, no need for an ambulance, just transport to the hospital. In this case, and many others, the team are happy to use the police van instead of calling an ambulance into the town centre. It is a real benefit having the hospital so close to the centre of the town!”

“Even though we transported this patient to the hospital, we were again back in the town centre and patrolling in under 20 minutes from the time of the call.”

Apparently this is British Medical Control

So he brought the guy to the hospital in the Police car. Actually I’m familiar with the fact that they do this over there. Mark is regularly staffed to what they call a “Rapid Response Car” which is part of their “Front-Loaded Model” where they send a paramedic first to emergency calls to determine what the best course of action would be for the patient. Many times they don’t send an ambulance until the paramedic makes the transport decision. One of those potential decisions is to simply transport patients in the car with them instead of the ambulance.

You can find Part One of “Working A Police Medic Shift” – Here

And you can find Part Two – Here

I’m no fan of socialized medicine, but I have to give credit where credit is due. The US EMS system could learn a lot from the British system and I just can’t get over the fact that so many of the things we speak of for the EMS 2.0 movement here in the US are being done right now by our brothers across the pond. It would stand to reason that we could use the data that they’ve collected and created right now, steal a lot of their ideas, and begin to implement them right here in the good ol’ US of A.

Wouldn’t it be great if there was some kind of “Project” where an a British Paramedic could come to the US and explore the US EMS system? How about where an American Paramedic could come to the United Kingdom and learn about their system?

Oh wait, there is. The Chronicles of EMS has been doing just that very thing. If you’re a regular reader I’m sure you’ve already heard of it. If you’re not familiar with it, you should go right now to www.ChroniclesOfEMS.com and learn about it. It’s an amazing thing done by both Mark Glencorse and Justin “The Happy Medic” Schorr. If you’re an American EMS person, you really need to know about this and show them as much support as you possibly can.

And while you’re at it, check out some of the other fine British EMS Bloggers:

Insomniac Medic – http://insomniacmedic.blogspot.com/

“A Life in the Day of a Basics Doc” – http://basicsdoc.blogspot.com/

Posted by on October 30, 2010 • Filed under: Administration & Leadership, Emergency Medical Services, EMS, ems 2.0, EMS Management, EMS Topics, ER, medicblog999, Paramedic, UK paramedics, united kingdom, universal healthcare, US economy, Your Happy Medic

A Late-Night Rant about Petty Politics in EMS

16 comments

I had to think about a Facebook comment that I just posted on my personal Facebook page. Admittedly, I’m pretty angry right now and I probably shouldn’t be writing. It’s been a long night, you see… and I’ve had it up to my eyeballs with what I’m angry at.

However, this blog is my therapy and I can use it to get some stuff off of my chest whenever I see fit, right? Good, then here goes.

Tonight I’m going to forget that my computer has been acting up on me and has lost two 1000word-plus articles that I was lining up for the end of the week. I’m not even going to mention that I’m behind on a lot of projects because I’ve been overwhelmed with work. I’m not even going to talk about how the workload that I’ve let pile up has been making the blog suffer… Nope. I’m going to jump to the front of the line and bring that Facebook comment right here, to the front of this blog page where a few thousand EMTs and Medics might read it this month.

“Revenue Preservation, Area Preservation, Ego Preservation, and Political Capital Preservation” – These things are the top priorities of some EMS agencies I’ve dealt with over the years. Patient care is on the list, but its way down on the bottom of these agencies’ priorities. Some agencies have their priorities straight, but more it’s more common than I’d like to admit that EMS agencies have those four things at the beginning of this paragraph firmly implanted into their unwritten mission statements.  

I’ve written at length about EMS politics and how I hate them. For example:

-          Is What You Do “The Best You Can Do”

-          Volunteer Fire/EMS – Taking the High Road and Letting Go

-          Two Cases, One Letter: From One Paramedic’s Struggles, Change Can Come

-          Cat Puke Chicken

-          EMS 2.0, Bernoulli, Fluid Dynamics, and Changing the World

-          And Much, Much more…

And tonight, again, I’ve seen yet another example of the worst kind of EMS politics. I’ve seen these situations countless times before and I’ll see them countless times again, I’m afraid. People who don’t put the patient first have missed the whole point to this EMS thing. We’re here for the patient. We’re here for the citizens. There is a selfless aspect to EMS that must be respected in the preservation of the greater good. To miss that for almost any reason is to disrespect not only the foundation that EMS was built upon, but also the foundation of the entire healthcare system.

“First, Do No Harm”

Yea, that’s the first pledge of the Hippocratic Oath, the same one that Physicians take when they become doctors. EMS people are an off-shoot of physicians and we should follow those four words up there as much as they have to. Using the citizens of your jurisdiction as pawns in a political game is to violate those most sacred of oaths. EMS people tend to feud for the flimsiest of forgettable reasons. These feuds escalate unchecked for years until every action taking by the opposing party seems only to reinforce the perceived validity of the petty feud, even when the original actions or inactions that caused the feud were lost to history or died with the people who started the feud to begin with. Often, neighboring squads hate each other for no reason that they can remember. Factions within a single EMS agency may feud internally for no good reason whatsoever. These things escalate and escalate until patients are harmed by them… for no reason at all.

And if there ever has been a reason to harm a patient for a petty feud between services, between cliques, or between individuals, I’ve yet to hear it. In my opinion, using a patient as a pawn in a political game is the worst kind of offense.

These petty EMS politics, these laughable feuds, and the little kingdoms must have the light shown upon them. As I said in my probably politically incorrect Facebook post:

“I don’t like it when Petty People play petty politics with peoples’ lives. Really, people die from the kind of stuff I’m angry at without ever knowing that they were pawns in a political game. EMS politics must be exposed to the light so that the people that play them can be scattered like the cockroaches they are.”

Do you see anything that I’m going to be in trouble for tomorrow when people read that post? Remember, that’s on my personal account… not the blog account. Yes, I do take personal responsibility for everything I say on this blog page or in any of my public speaking or writing for that matter, but there’s a chance that people I know and may or may not have been talking about will read that tomorrow. My guess is that I will be the bad guy for saying it.

And frankly, I don’t care.

As I said in the post that I linked to above, Volunteer Fire/EMS – Taking the High Road and Letting Go – I am willing to bury each and every hatchet I do now hold or have ever held and solemnly pledge to conduct myself in friendship, mutual understanding, and for the good of the ideals in which we all should share. My guess is that there are people out there tonight who should do exactly the same. Don’t let petty politics harm those whom we’re pledged to serve. It’s not about us. It’s about them. It’s about our ideals.
It’s bigger than us. We are more than the sum of our parts. Don’t forget that.

I know that this hasn’t been the most polished piece I’ve ever posted up here, but everything I’ve said I believe. That’s why I’m a blogger. It’s why I’m a paramedic as well. Thanks for letting me rant.

The EMT Oath as adopted by the NAMET

EMTs have an Oath as well...

Posted by on October 27, 2010 • Filed under: Administration & Leadership, change, ckemtp rants, Command & Leadership, edemse, Emergency Medical Services, emotions, EMS, EMS ethics, EMS Management, EMS rant, EMS Topics, Ethics, everyday ems ethics, Fire Rescue Topics, medical ethics, Paramedic, politics, professionalism, rant, Uncategorized

I don’t usually talk about Political things…

4 comments

But when I do, they’re usually of the macro-local type and  have something directly to do with EMS.

This is one of those things.

The village of Schaumburg bucked the national trend of raising taxes and fees to cover rising expenses when its board unanimously approved a 4.4 percent reduction to the 2010 property tax levy

You read that right: reduction.

But that’s not all.  Village officials also did away with vehicle sticker fees and moved to have property taxes cover garbage removal.  

Just for the record, Schaumburg is in Illinois, folks. The same state that sent our senator up to the White House last election cycle. Lowering taxes isn’t exactly the modus operandi for an Illinois municipality. In fact:

Schaumburg is an anomaly among Illinois municipalities. Others like Gurnee and Orland Park raising taxes and fees where ever they can. Northbrook, which has seen an increase in sales tax revenue stood pat.

Schaumburg is one of the larger municipalities in the sprawling conglomeration of suburbs surrounding Chicago. It faces the exact same economic challenges that other municipalities in the area face, but it seems to be doing much better, economy wise.

The measure, if you read the article, isn’t final, but it looks like it will pass. Schaumburg has a full-time Fire/EMS dept and pays their firefighters extremely well, they also seem to have great city services and every time I’ve been in the city I’ve liked what I’ve seen.

In fact, the recent NAEMSE conference was held in a hotel in Schaumburg, and they played a small part in paying the hotel tax.

As I’ve said before, I’m not one to wax too poltical on this blog. This is an EMS and Fire blog and you come here to read about things related to Fire and EMS. I understand that. I don’t want to hijack the discussion to the miasma that is our national political scene and end up alienating a different percentage of my readership every time I post something of an opinionated political nature. However, local politics affect EMS and Fire, and I speak on the politics of EMS quite a bit. This is one of those issues.

I have to ask the question here:

Businesses pay taxes, residents pay taxes, Visitors pay taxes… It goes to say that the more businesses, residents, and visitors a locality gets, the more taxes they’ll pay by sheer volume. People have a choice on where they locate their business, where they visit, and where they choose to live. If you were in the position to do any of these things, knowing that Schaumburg is lowering their taxes, and plans on removing their property tax entirely - just like they said they would – would you choose to do so in Schaumburg, or in the other towns mentioned in this article?

In additon, removing the stupid municipal car stickers, which are really just a massive inconvenience and hassle to the residents of a city, and covering garbage disposal fees through what’s left of the property tax?

Well, Schaumburg… you may just be an island of sanity in an insane state. May word get out and people flock to your borders. It’s called “competition” and usually only successful businesses are the groups that think of lowering their prices to become more attractive to the customer. Bravo.

Source: http://www.nbcchicago.com/news/local-beat/Schaumburg-Officials-May-Lower-Property-Taxes-103947993.html?dr#ixzz10vUpO9PP

Posted by on September 29, 2010 • Filed under: Administration & Leadership, Economics, Emergency Medical Services, EMS, EMS Management, EMS Topics, fire, Fire Rescue Topics, Funding & Staffing, News, newspaper, Paramedic, Uncategorized

EMS case law? AMA Refusals, Death, and Documentation

18 comments

Our friend Valerie DeFrance, who runs the EMS House of Defrance from way up in the Vast Frozen Wasteland facebooked this article this morning and you need to read it.

http://www.leagle.com/unsecure/page.htm?shortname=inmoco20100921246

Yep, check that URL. It’s from a site that specializes in putting out snippets of case law and this one’s simply all-too-common.

You should read the article, or at least skim through the salient points, because this affects you personally. You as an EMS provider should know about this. Pay attention to this case and what it means to you.

In this case, a Paramedic/EMT-B ambulance responded to a person experiencing Chest Pain and Difficulty Breathing. This is a quote from the article: (The emphasis is mine)

The unit arrived at decedent’s home and Respondents performed a primary survey of the decedent ten minutes after the initial call was placed. Respondents followed up on their primary survey with a secondary survey a minute later. They then obtained a set of vital signs. Based on their examination, Respondents diagnosed decedent with acid reflux and recommended a treatment of over-the-counter Maalox/Gaviscon. Believing decedent was in no immediate medical danger, Respondents left the home fifteen minutes after arriving.

The next morning at approximately 10:30 a.m. decedent again called 9-1-1, still complaining of difficulty breathing and chest pains. An ambulance unit from Community Fire Protection District was again dispatched to decedent’s home arriving five minutes later. This unit was manned by a different two-person team than had responded the night before. After finding the decedent was experiencing pain across the chest and into the back, shortness of breath, diaphoresis and nausea, the team began administering emergency treatment with oxygen, aspirin and EKG. At 10:55 a.m. the team initiated emergency transport of decedent to DePaul Health Center where he was admitted ten minutes later. At the Health Center decedent was diagnosed with cardiac arrest and pulmonary embolism and began receiving treatment. The treatment was unsuccessful and decedent died at 4:00 p.m. on 11 July 2008.

So do you see a problem there?

First off, I’m assuming they obtained an AMA refusal form (and if they didn’t, they’re idiots). This case highlights exactly what I’ve always said about refusals being worthless. There’s no mention of the patient having refused transport here. In fact, this isn’t a case on whether or not the EMTs actions were correct or incorrect. This is simply a case to see whether or not they have protection under the doctrine of Sovereign Immunity. It looks to me like they were basing their defense on whether or not they have that legal protection, not basing it on their thought that they provided proper care. It looks like they were assumed not to have provided it. In this case, a signed refusal meant nothing. If they were successfully sued with no mention of the AMA form, what good is it?

Second off, it’s in the official record that their PRIMARY survey took less than a minute… and I can believe that if they were solely attempting to rule out an immediate life threat. That’s what the primary survey is for. As evidenced by the fact that the deceased lasted another ten hours, I can assume that there was no immediate threat to his life. However, they then did a “secondary survey” one minute later and cleared the scene with what I assume to be an AMA refusal in just fifteen minutes. So if we time this out, they made it to the patient’s side in one minute, did two assessments, obtained a refusal, and cleared the scene in 15 minutes? That’s one minute to grab gear and walk to the patient, a minute to rule out immediate life threats, a few minutes to do a secondary assessment and vitals, with no mention of an EKG, and a few minutes to carry whatever gear they took in back to the truck, get back in the truck, and clear? Um… Either these are the fastest medics in the West, or they did a very poor assessment.

And the guy died. And they got sued. And they lost. And they freaking deserved to lose.

The second crew seems to have provided proper care for the patient, and that is evidenced in the case outcome. In fact, the lawyers and the judge seem to have made it a point to show the poor care provided by the first crew in contrast to the proper care provided by the second crew. It’s clearly evident here and I’ll bet that if we were to go to that agency and inspect it, we could probably see the difference in dedication and motivation between the first and second crew. The first paramedic comes off as lazy, callous, and stupid whereas the second paramedic comes off as competent and caring. I’d be willing to bet that this is honestly the case. That the first medic was a “good enough” medic who often encouraged AMA refusals and performed just to the bare minimum and the second medic was somewhat better than the first.

So how, as EMS providers, how do we protect against the precedent set by this case law?

The answer is still now as it always has been, do a thorough assessment every time, kick the decisions up to the physician, and document, document, document. This case was in 2008 and if you were doing EMS back then, you know that a 12-lead EKG was the standard of care. This patient should have had a working diagnosis (Chest pain), attempts at making a differential diagnosis (lung sounds, History and Physical Exam, EKG, SpO2, and trended vital signs and 12-leads) and should have been transported. If the patient wanted to refuse, the physician medical control should have been contacted and this should have been documented. The time limit of 14 minutes of assessment and/or care in this case is evidence that this didn’t happen. The medics blew his call for help off and the patient died.

Here’s what I would have done: I would have performed a thorough patient assessment including lung sounds, ABD assessment, and a history. I would have gotten the OPQRST of the patient’s complaint, and performed serial 12-lead EKGs. Then I would have transported. If the patient refused, I would have transmitted the 12-lead EKG, spoken with a physician about the case, and attempted to have the physician speak with the patient. This all would have been thoroughly documented.

Patients have the right to refuse care if they are conscious, alert, and oriented. They have this right even if they’re being stupid. We have the responsibility to help them make a proper, rational decision and to show that we made every effort to provide them with the best possible information. Proper patient care and excellent documentation are the way we protect against these types of lawsuits… and that really hasn’t changed.

This kind of situation can and does happen. Protect yourself and your agency by never becoming lazy. Document! Document! Document! Do your best every time. Be thorough and don’t succumb to mediocrity just because it’s easy. It will catch up to you just like it did to these two.

————————————————————

For more tips on EMS documentation:

Posted by on September 27, 2010 • Filed under: Administration & Leadership, Case law, Command & Leadership, Emergency Medical Services, EMS, EMS ethics, EMS Management, ems narrative, EMS narrative report, ems patient care report, ems report, EMS Topics, EMS training, Management, narrative, narrative report, Paramedic, paramedic education, Patient Management, scenario, scenario based training, Training & Development

Automatic Window Roller Uppers and Other “Great” Ideas

12 comments

A few years back I had the chance to drive a 1997 Saturn 5-speed coupe for a while. It was a pretty nice car and I drove it back and forth on my tri-weekly 2 hour commute from the Quad Cities of IL to the Chicago Suburbs for my 24hr ambulance shift. It actually worked out well because the pay for paramedics was so much higher in the Chicago area than it was where I lived. I’d go up, do a 24 or a 48 hour shift, and have plenty of time to work my other jobs back home.  I didn’t really mind the drive but I’d save so much money by driving the Saturn instead of my full-size truck that I’d drive it whenever the ex-gf would let me.

One thing about driving the highways around Chicago is the incessant amount of toll-booths that one must cross while driving there. There are literally more toll-booths than I can count and every one of them requires a person to get out of traffic, stop, and pay the toll. It’s annoying in a car with an automatic transmission and even more annoying with a manual transmission. It aggravates me to say the least.

One of the features of the 97 Saturn SL 2 Coupe is an automatic window roller downer (is there a better name for that?) where the window will roll all the way down with just one click of the button. It was actually pretty handy for going through a toll-booth in a car with a manual transmission. I could click the button, then focus on downshifting for the quickest stop possible. This feature is common on cars nowadays, but back in the primitive turn-of-the-century it was my first Automatic Window Roller Downer Feature and I thought it was pretty cool… Except for one problem:

The window only went down automatically, It wouldn’t roll back up with only one click and had to be *manually* automatically rolled back up again. Yes, by this I mean I actually had to use one whole finger to hold the button. It was kind of a minor annoyance when I had to reaccelerate while shifting the manual transmission. Back then I didn’t think it was a huge annoyance, mind you… but I thought that the simple addition of an automatic roller back upper feature would have been much better. I could just imagine that the simple change would make it more useful and I was a tad angry about the shortsightedness of the engineers. I mean, why couldn’t they have thought of this when it seemed so obvious to my 20yo self? If I had thought of it had to be a good idea, right?

Well then some years later, I rented a car that actually had both an automatic roller downer feature *and* an automatic roller upper feature. I was so happy to find that! It was SO COOL! Finally the engineers had listened to my private thoughts that I never shared with anyone and put in my feature! I was happy.

Then I tried it for a while… and it sucked.

Yea, having a “one click” roller upper feature means never just cracking the window open a bit. One click may bring the window down a touch, but the auto feature keeps it rolling down all the way. In the previous design, without the automatic roller upper, this could be stopped by one quick click in the other direction. However, with the automatic roller upper feature, the window just rolls back all the way up! Getting the window open just a little bit is nearly impossible. Then I thought that if a kid or a less-than-intelligent adult chanced to stick their head through the open window and the button got depressed, the window could roll all the way up and choke them. The automatic window roller upper feature is annoying as heck and wasn’t the great idea that I thought it would be. It was an idea that I didn’t think all the way though. I thought I was smart and well, I wasn’t. It’s probably a good idea that I didn’t get all fired up and start a national letter writing campaign to lobby the car companies to put in automatic window roller upper features (Which I would have urged them to rename to “Chris’s Awesome Mega RoLL uPPahhz”) because then I would have looked like an idiot to more people than just myself. It’s the reason why I rarely orchestrate nationwide letter writing campaigns: experience. 

This got me thinking about all of the ideas that I’ve had about things in EMS and in other aspects of my career that I didn’t think wholly through. Steve Whitehead, the genius behind http://www.TheEMTspot.com wrote an article recently that spoke of the fatal flaws in the heroes of Greek Tragedy that I really liked. You can find the article here “8 Tragic EMS Behavior Flaws to Avoid” (I’ll link it at the end too, because you really should read it) but here’s what struck me so blatantly in the article:

The Critic – “This is all so stupid”

This is perhaps the easiest of all the hero flaws to slip into and the toughest to shake. The critic is convinced that the world desperately needs his or her opinions on the way things ought to be.  They figure out that offering opinions is so much more fun and rewarding than working to solve a problem and then it becomes like a drug. Soon they’re framing everything they see with the question, “How should this be done better?” and then offering their sage analysis. Usually with a poor understanding of why the thing is the way it is in the first place.

The problem with the critic is that they genuinely believe that the world wants to hear their endless assessments and when an army of engineers doesn’t show up to start doing the hard work of implementing all their great ideas, they get frustrated. The second problem is that they jump to analysis without seeking to ever understand the nature of the problem. Research and implementation are hard, but critical evaluation is fun and easy. As long as they don’t build anything real, they never have to worry about the next critic showing up, spending a few minutes looking at what they built and offering up their sage criticism.

This is the part of Steve’s article that really got me thinking. Have I been “The Critic” too often in my career? I mean, I don’t try to do this… but I find faults in a lot of aspects of contemporary EMS. I look at things and try to find ways to make them better. If you’re a regular reader, in-fact, that’s probably why you come to read what I have to say as often as you do. New ideas are great.

However, as my Automatic Window Roller Upper debacle (that yes, wholly occurred only within the boundaries of my own cranial cavity) has shown, some ideas that come to me and seem so obvious can also be bad ideas. My experience has proven to me time and time again that I need to think things through. I try, but EMS doesn’t always allow us the time to consider all options, let alone every aspect of every option. The Law of Unintended Consequences abounds and rears its ugly head quite often.

As the years have drug on, I’ve been trying to analyze my “Great” ideas more fully, but one person rarely has the ability to completely devise the correct answer to every problem. Two heads are better than one a lot of the time and systems have a way of developing themselves.

So as we go forth to change this thing we call EMS and usher in the new world of EMS 2.0, let’s remember to consider as many reasoned opinions as we can. We need your input and we need your participation. The more we grow together, the better our ideas become.

Oh, and here’s that link to Steve’s Article again: “8 Tragic EMS Behavior Flaws to Avoid”

Posted by on August 16, 2010 • Filed under: Administration & Leadership, ckemtp, Command & Leadership, Emergency Medical Services, EMS, ems 2.0, EMS Management, EMS Motivation, EMS Topics, Fire Rescue Topics, Firefighter, grumblemedics, inside the mind of a paramedic, Paramedic, paramedic education, Training & Development, training-fire-rescue-topics

You Can Nap if You Want To! Or You can Leave Your Calls Behind!

17 comments

What a week! You’ve been pulling at least a double shift a week at your full-time ambulance job and have been hitting it pretty hard at your part-time job as well. Both services can’t seem to keep their schedules filled and everyone’s been working lots of hours in order to keep the doors going up and the trucks going out. To top it all off, the citizens just can’t seem to be good lately and both services’ call volumes have been high.

You were tired when you got up this morning and were seriously considering a nap after your morning shower, but after a gallon or two of coffee you were bright and shiny in your uniform at your station, ready for another day of EMS greatness.

That was five hours ago though, and the early barrage of calls fired at you this morning has turned into an afternoon lull. Now you’re sitting at your main station, close to the brass, with the words in the educational article you’re reading fading in and out of your bleary, cross-eyed vision. Since the activity level has decreased, you’ve gotten yourself a case of the sleepies that you just can’t shake. Since you’ve been consuming the steaming bean juice religiously lately, your stomach just won’t let you think of having another cup of the acrid station coffee and there’s no shift chores left to do, since you did them an hour ago fighting the same lethargy.

Unfortunately, in three hours you can see a long distance transfer scheduled that you’re probably going to have to do. Four hours of monotonous highway driving and the radio in the truck doesn’t have that great of reception. You don’t have any idea how you’re going to stay awake enough to drive the truck and that’s not even considering the fact that if the tones went off right now for an emergency you probably wouldn’t remember how to put on a band-aid, let alone remember a drug calculation.

You’re tired, you’re fatigued, and your body’s telling you that you’ve been pushing it too hard. It wants to shut down for a while. Your brain won’t think. You’re mouth won’t talk. You can’t keep your eyes open and wake up with a startle when you’ve realized you’ve dozed off for a bit. This is torture.

Sleep deprivation is no stranger to EMS people. We’ve all fought the lethargy caused by long 24, 48, and more-hour shifts. A great number of us work more than one job to make ends meet and pack as much family time and recreation into our off time as we can. A lot of us are going for more education and all of us get woken up from our sleep a lot more often than is healthy to run on calls. I regularly miss full nights of sleep and rarely have a night when I can say I got a full night’s sleep. We get use to it some of the way, but our bodies just aren’t meant for chronic sleep deprivation. We need to reset and reorder our brains and let our bodies recharge once in a while.

Unfortunately, our communities need us and we have to be there for them. EMS is important and it’s easy to get sucked in.

That’s why in this situation, I have very little dispute with taking a “Safety Nap”.

"SSSS-AAAA-FFFF-EEEE...."

The “Safety Nap” is a quick power nap. A shut-down and reset period where a person who never knows when they may be called to be up all night without sleep can rest and relax for a while and ensure that they’ll be wide awake and alert for whatever they may be called to do. I took an hour last shift around 3pm as a matter of fact. I didn’t get to sleep until 1am afterwards and I was up at 5am for a call. EMS is like that, shift work is like that. We have to ensure that we’re well-rested enough to make quality decisions of the type we have to when they need to be made… and we can’t do them well when we’re drooling on ourselves from exhaustion. One of Murphy’s laws for EMS states that “You know you’re in EMS when your favorite hallucinogen is sheer exhaustion” and I have to tell you, I’ve done that while on duty before. It’s just not safe.

There are problems with this, I know. Some will say that we shouldn’t allow ourselves to be scheduled this many hours and that it’s irresponsible to do so. Well, then they can come talk to my bosses and pay my mortgage. Some people will sleep all day if they let them, and won’t put any effort into their shifts unless they have to. That has to be monitored. With that said, a balance has to be sought. I see nothing wrong with the occasional safety nap and I believe that EMS managers should allow it. They also should be unafraid to throw a cup of cold water on the Rip Van Winkles among us to ensure that they pull their weight with the non-call-response aspects of an EMS job.

What do you think? Does your employer allow “Safety Naps”? Do you take them?

I’d write more but Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Posted by on August 4, 2010 • Filed under: Administration & Leadership, Ambulance, ambulance humor, Command & Leadership, Emergency Medical Services, EMS, EMS Health & Safety, EMS Humor, EMS Management, EMS safety, EMS Topics, EMT, Ethics, Fire Rescue Topics, Firefighter Safety & Health, Management, Paramedic, patient care, Patient Management, salary, shift length, Uncategorized

Modern (f)Art

4 comments

Howdy Everyone!! It’s Ckemtp, your friendly neighborhood EMS and Fire blogger with a few things I’d like to bring to your attention. I’d like to talk to you today about politicians. Not the politicians that are doing such a great job at managing our collective money on the national level… I want to talk to you today about the local ones, the ones who do the important work of making sure our traffic lights aren’t burnt out, that our roads are pot-hole free, and that our sewer systems don’t back up and discharge raw sewage into lakes and rivers and stuff.

Specifically, I’d like to talk about Local Politicians and public art.

My favorite writer, the legendary Humorist Mr. Dave Barry, wrote a piece about public art a few years back that you just have to read before continuing on with this post. It’s actually one of many of his articles that include things about public art, which he defines as “Art that is purchased by experts who are not spending their own personal money” it also involves the phrase “a naked man the size of an oil derrick” and has references to nuclear weapons and alcohol. I love Dave Barry, I really do.

Read this: “Does Public Art Make Sense” – Then come back once you stop ROFL’ing 

This is "Art" I think... Oh I know! It's a bus stop

Then, g’head and read THIS ARTICLE from Michigan Capitol Confidential which talks about the REALLY SMART city of Ann Arbor, Michigan… which is planning an $850,000 piece of public art. It’s really interesting to me that they’re planning this… and I really hope it isn’t made of flammable material because the city is “Facing a multimillion dollar budget deficit” and is planning on laying off firefighters to handle the budget crisis.

Here’s that article again: http://www.michigancapitolconfidential.com/13219

Yes, Ann Arbor, MI, the REALLY SMART city that it is, is laying off firefighters while spending $850,000 (That’s EIGHT HUNDRED FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS) on a “three piece public fountain”.

Oh, right… if it’s a fountain, it probably won’t burn down. That makes sense. Of course it might get filled with trash, since they’re laying off the city’s “Solid Waste Coordinator”. Y’know… the guy who oversees the trash pickup for the city. On the other hand though, they are hiring an “Art Coordinator” to, I don’t know… look at the art maybe? Maybe he’ll pick up the trash from the fountain.

Taxpayers, I’m talking to you here. Inefficiencies and, in this case, abject stupidity in local governments are killing us. If I was having trouble keeping up with the maintenance and mortgage in my own house, the first thing that I would do would not be to buy new paintings to hang on the walls. I certainly wouldn’t buy paintings at the expense of paying for trash pick-up, sewer service, or portable fire extinguishers. I think that I would pay for necessities first and niceties second. Responsible people take care of the whole Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs thing; Food, clothing, and Shelter first and buy pretty things after that. You do the things you HAVE to do well before the things you’d like to do.

At least responsible, SMART people do that… and apparently that’s not the kind of people that the voters in Ann Arbor, MI think would make good city council members.

Or do they?

Maybe they can call this "Art"

Posted by on July 27, 2010 • Filed under: Administration & Leadership, Command & Leadership, dave barry, Emergency Medical Services, EMS, EMS Management, EMS Topics, Fire department, Fire Rescue Topics, Funding & Staffing, News, politics, Uncategorized

As AmboDriver Always says… For all you EMS types

2 comments

The good folks over at EMS Magazine and Http://www.EMSresponder.com have seen fit to publish some of my EMS type ramblings in print format. It’s an article on Partnering With your Community as an EMS agency and if-I-do-say-so-myself it’s got some useful information in it.

So take a trip on over to have a read at http://emsresponder.com/print/EMS-Magazine/Community-Partnerships/1$13742 

Or, you could go ahead and wait till your magazine arrives in the mail of course… you do subscribe, don’t you?

Posted by on July 1, 2010 • Filed under: Administration & Leadership, Ambulance, Command & Leadership, Emergency Medical Services, EMS, EMS Management, EMS Topics, Fire Prevention & Education, Fire Rescue Topics, Management, Paramedic, volunteer fire department

Master Paramedics? I’m asking you a question

27 comments

Let me ask YOU a question. What do you think about this:

How do we recognize the best and brightest among us? How would we distinguish the EMTs and Paramedics who have earned the respect and admiration of their peers for being “Really Good” at what they do? I don’t mean just a little bit good, or “pretty” good. I mean masterfully good. The kind of Paramedics that Johnny and/or Roy would have wanted to be had they grown up watching them on Saturday mornings. The kind of people that have worked in the profession for as long as they can remember but that never lost the passion for the job. The kind of people who read everything they can, study everything they can get their hands on, and always seem to have the answers to the most challenging of EMS trivia, as well as the most mundane.

What would we call them?

The old trade guilds used to call their most experienced and skilled members “Master”, as in the term “Master Craftsman”. As their members worked through the years and learned the ropes of the trade, they progressed through the various levels until they reached “Master” status. Some unions still use those terms and honestly, I’m unfamiliar with what all of them are. That’s ok with me because I see Paramedicine as a profession and not as a trade, but I do respect their tradition of honoring those that have earned the title of “Master” by thoroughly mastering their craft.

So what do we EMS people do? How would we recognize a “Master Paramedic” or “Master EMT”?

I’ve been thinking about this for quite a while, honestly. As I progress in the profession and in my career path, I’ve seen the people who were my mentors keep working alongside of me. They’re my colleagues now, and although they still mentor me in some ways, they have been progressing along their own paths just as I have this whole time. Some of them have become true masters of the profession. Some of them have not. Some of them could really be called “Master Paramedics” and I would like to know how we as a profession should recognize those people. I see that these people don’t tend to be treated very well by the profession in general and I think that it’s a crying shame. Think about it, new paramedics walk in the doors to the profession and are allowed to work in the same capacity as our master medics within a relatively short time. Employers tend to not want to keep these people around when budgets get tight because these people tend to be on the upper end of the pay scale. In some agencies there’s a defined career path and upward ladder, but in a lot of (and dare I say most) agencies there is not.

So what if there were a certification, or some way to define a “Master Paramedic” and/or “Master EMT”? What would be the qualifications? What would be the benefits? How would we define those people who have earned (Yes, really EARNED) “Master” status?

This is one of the things I’m asking you to think about. If you would please, put some thought into this and write what you think would make a “Master” paramedic or “Master” EMT in the comments section. No, I don’t think that this is silly. I really want to know what you all think about this.

Here’s what I think:

-          Minimum Years in the Profession: The Master EMT or Paramedic should have more than 10 years of FULL TIME service (15 years if volunteer, depending on call volume)

-          Minimum Experience and Type of Calls:  The master EMT or Paramedic should be experienced in a broad spectrum of the different types of EMS. 911 response within diverse response strategies, Medical Transports, and In-Hospital medical care.

-          Teaching and Precepting Experience:  The Master EMT or Paramedic should have experience teaching EMS classes and in mentoring new providers.

-          Command Experience:   The Master Paramedic of EMT should have experience in being in command of different types of emergency scenes and large scale responses.

-          Knowledge:  The Master Paramedic or EMT should have to pass a complex series of tests that show not only rote memorization, but also complete conceptualization and deep background knowledge of a broad spectrum of EMS and Medical related knowledge.

-          Acknowledgement by Peers:  The Master Paramedic or EMT should have the support and admiration of his colleagues, coworkers, and peers and should be able to get them to vouch for him or her when asked.

Now, I also ask you. If you were to recognize a person that could pass the standards that I’ve set, or that you and others set in the comments below, how should we show our respect to these people for their professional achievements? How should our profession honor and acknowledge our highest achievers?

I’m very curious about this issue. Please feel free to add your thoughts.

Posted by on June 8, 2010 • Filed under: Administration & Leadership, appreciation, Command & Leadership, Emergency Medical Services, EMS, ems 2.0, ems education, EMS ethics, EMS Management, EMS Motivation, EMS pep talk, EMS Topics, Paramedic, paramedic salary, pride, profession, professionalism, Training & Development, training-fire-rescue-topics

EMS 2.0 as Explained to My Brother

14 comments

My brother is an engineer. Yes, he’s a firefighter and occasionally he still drives the Fire Truck, but I’m not talking about being an engineer as it relates to the fire service. I’m talking about a pocket-protector wearing, slide-rule-sliding Engineer who draws lines on paper and calculates weight to strength ratios and the like. It’s math that’s way over my head and I’m glad that he’s the one that has to do that type of work every day and not me. When he explains his job to me my brain starts to overheat and I’m surprised that my hair hasn’t caught on fire yet. It started smoking once, but I was able to catch a glimpse of “The Hills” on the TV and it slowed my mental activity just in time.

My brother, Captain Kaiser, is a volunteer fire captain and he used to be an EMT although he let it lapse due to the fact that it limited time with his family. I guess that I got the EMS genes and he got the “go to college and get a real job that pays well” genes. I say more power to him and he’s one of my best friends. I don’t get to see him as much as I should, but we talk often on the phone. He has always been interested in hearing all of my tales of EMS glory, and I listen to tales of his two daughters. Raising daughters sounds waaaay different than raising my son.

The other day I was talking to him about “this blogging stuff I do” and I breached the subject of EMS 2.0. I haven’t written much about EMS 2.0 by name lately, although the concepts I’ve been bringing forth fit into my model of it, but trust me when I say there has been a lot of behind the scenes activity. It turned into an interesting conversation with my brother. He was an EMT but never got past the volunteering when his community needs him stage. That’s an honorable place to be, no doubt, but he didn’t delve into the level that I take it to. So explaining EMS 2.0 to him was close to explaining it to an educated lay person.

In the conversation, I brought up the scenario that I used to write the post: “Are We the Gatekeepers to the Emergency Healthcare System?” (Unofficially titled, “Did I do good?”) and explained to him how I evaluated a patient in a nursing home, performed a full assessment on her including a 12-lead EKG and a review of her recent lab work, held a telephone conference with her Primary Care Physician and the Nursing staff on scene, and triaged the patient to the Primary Heathcare System as opposed to the Emergency Healthcare System. In the process, I saved the healthcare system (in the form of Medicare) thousands of dollars and provided better care to the patient by deferring her from the emergency room. I explained to him that my ambulance service could not bill the patient for the care I provided her because we did not transport and that the current system needs to recognize the value in having EMS provide such services in terms of cost-savings. If I would have transported, our service would have made the revenue, but Medicare would have paid thousands of dollars in unnecessary care overall. Since I didn’t, I saved Medicare thousands, but the service wasn’t valued and we didn’t receive any compensation for our work.

Basically, the conversation wound up being that he agreed with me that EMS has a powerful position to improve access to primary care and “save” healthcare as it were by increasing access to primary care, properly deferring patients from the emergency healthcare system when their care could be more appropriately managed in the primary care setting, and by saving millions of dollars in the overall healthcare setting. He agreed with me that it would require deregulation of the EMS industry to allow us to attempt programs and offer new services outside of our current mold and would require increased education of street-level EMS providers to get this done. He also agreed with me that money we’re already collectively spending should be allocated from inefficient programs and given to efficient high-performance EMS systems to do this in order to realize greater savings.

Remember, he’s an engineer. He’s good at math. He may not be a healthcare provider currently schlepping patients around in a shiny red and white bus that makes “woo woo” sounds, but he’s as smart as they come…

And when I told him that he’s exactly who we should be getting our message out to, he disagreed. He thinks that we should be out there talking to politicians and Insurance Industry executives. Honestly, he chastised me for not being in my local congresshuman’s office to do just that.

So, here’s a shoutout to the politicos out there: “EMS can ‘save’ healthcare through a free-market, grass-roots, innovative solution using currently available resources. We can save millions and improve the entire healthcare system just by putting in place a few good ideas and allowing EMS professionals the ability to think outside of the box”.

So do me a favor, y’all. Go tell your local politico to e-mail me at Proems1@yahoo.com. I’d love to have a talk with them. You should too.

Posted by on May 26, 2010 • Filed under: Administration & Leadership, Command & Leadership, Economics, Emergency Medical Services, EMS, ems 2.0, EMS Management, EMS system, EMS Topics, Fire Rescue Topics, Management, Paramedic, paramedic education, PR, profession, US economy

EMS Week – Letter to the Editor (2010 version)

3 comments

This is another in my series of Letters that you may send to your local newspaper to help spread the word of EMS week. This one may be modified to fit your individual needs.

——————————————-

You may never give it a second thought but we’re here for you. When the unthinkable happens Emergency Medical Professionals are standing ready to swoop in and help you and your loved ones. Whether it’s a serious medical condition or accident, EMTs and Paramedics are quietly and heroically performing lifesaving tasks in our communities every day.

EMS Week 2010 will be celebrated this year the week of May 16th to the 21st. It is a national awareness week highlighting the vital services provided every day by the Emergency Medical Services professionals throughout every community in the United States. Here in (OUR COMMUNITY) we are lucky to be served by dedicated EMTs and Paramedics who give of themselves in many capacities to ensure that our lives are protected.

(OUR AMBULANCE SERVICE) is the 911 ambulance provider for the (COVERAGE AREA). In addition, we provide paramedic services for surrounding communities and non-emergency transportation services for patients throughout the greater (SERVICE AREA). We would like to thank the citizens in our service area for all of the support that they have given us in the past and would like to take this opportunity to express our continued passion for health in our community. We pledge to continue providing the highest quality Emergency Medical Services and Medical Transportation and to continuously find new and innovative ways to improve our quality and service to our community.

In order to do this we are calling on our citizens to support us by taking a few steps of their own. First, everyone should learn CPR. It is a simple and easy way to make a big impact in the lives of your neighbors and loved ones. With the odds of surviving sudden cardiac arrest decreasing roughly 10% per minute without adequate CPR and Defibrillation, good early CPR saves lives. If everyone knew this lifesaving skill just think of what we could do and who we could save. Please contact our office or your local hospital to find out about upcoming classes.

Second, everyone should learn the warning signs for heart attack and stroke. Studies have shown that 60% of people call a friend or family member when they realize that they may be having a serious medical problem. You should know that approximately 1% of cardiac tissue dies per minute in an untreated heart attack. Paramedic ambulances provide lifesaving medications that can stop or slow down this damage and can be at your side within minutes of a call to 911. This treatment is not only lifesaving, it also can greatly improve your quality of life after the attack.

Again, thank you to our citizens for their support. We encourage the public to say hello to our EMTs and Paramedics as they see them around town and also to contact our office for more information on any of the above topics. Please also see our website at (YOUR WEBSITE, TWITTER ACCOUNTS, and FACEBOOK).

 Sincerely,

(Your Name)

(Your Service)

Posted by on May 16, 2010 • Filed under: Emergency Medical Services, EMS, EMS Management, EMS Topics, EMS week, ems week 2010, Paramedic

EMS Week – Introducing EMS to the Public. Spread the word

4 comments

This is another in my series of posts that you may send as a letter to the editor of your local newspaper and/or put in for publication on your site to use my words to help spread the message of EMS week. You may use this freely, but please keep it intact.

————————————————

Barely given a passing thought until the unthinkable happens, the emergency medical services (EMS) are always there, toiling in relative obscurity until the flashing lights and wailing sirens of an ambulance remind you that there are indeed paramedics out there waiting for your call. People don’t tend to think of the ambulance service that cares for them and their loved ones as an essential service. They also rarely think much about them when they aren’t in need of their care. Usually then it’s only to wonder “What is taking them so long!?” instead of wondering if they’re currently bogged down with a lack of resources due to funding constraints and/or abuse of the emergency healthcare system.

Ambulances are a part of every community in one form or another and the US certainly has one of the best EMS systems the world has ever seen. Highly trained paramedics and Emergency Medical Technicians (EMTs) have progressed far past what the public perception of them tends to be and instead of being there only to provide a quick lights-and-sirens rush to the hospital, today’s ambulance is a ‘Mobile Intensive Care Unit’ that can roughly provide care equivalent to the first hour or so of care in the Emergency Room. The focus has long shifted from bringing the patient to care and now focuses on bringing care to the patient. While there are a few conditions that warrant immediate evaluation and treatment by a physician there are many more that benefit from immediate stabilization in the field provided by a paramedic or EMT. In fact, the care provided in the first few minutes of symptom onset by a paramedic can make the difference between a ‘bump-in-the-road’ for your health and long-term morbidity and lasting ill effects.

Think of a paramedic as Emergency Healthcare Specialists focused on the Acute, or care of the “Here and Now”. If it’s happening to you and it’s going to harm or even kill you, chances are that a paramedic can step in and make a big difference in the progression of the disease process. They may not be able to cure you, but they can make a good deal of difference in terms of stabilization and in limiting the long-term harm that you suffer.

Even in the United States, and perhaps especially here in the US, there is variability in the level of care and service provided by ambulance services. Each state has their own individual licensing requirements and the level of authority on those licenses varies greatly due to local control within those states. All paramedics and EMTs function under the ultimate authority of a Licensed Physician to provide “Medical Control” and a system of standing medical orders or “protocols” that the paramedics and EMTs use their medical judgment to pick and choose from based upon their working field diagnosis of a patient’s condition. In my home state of Illinois, the medical direction has provided what some EMS personnel would consider to be conservative protocols while just across the state line in Wisconsin the protocols allow much more breadth in the abilities of the paramedic and EMT to care for the patient. These differences can be caused by myriad factors ranging from the personal prerogative of the medical control physician, to local political pressures, and even to distance to a hospital emergency room. The way that a service is configured also plays a roll, with some private ambulance services having experience in “Critical Care” paramedicine, and some Fire Department based providers focusing on short transport times. Within the industry, there is much debate on the topic of what organizational configuration, Fire-Based, Hospital-Based, Private-for-profit, Private-Not-For-Profit, Governmental Third Service, or otherwise provides for the best operational effectiveness and therefore the best patient care. While the opinions have run very high, it is clear that no one solution will work for every community. The public does need to be aware that EMS is not simply a function of “The Fire Department” or “the hospital” or of anything other than EMS itself existing to provide optimal patient care. The terms “Firefighter” and “Paramedic” are no more synonymous than are “Garbageman” and “Librarian”. The importance is that Paramedics and EMTs focus on healthcare and providing the best quality EMS. However some communities have chosen to combine the functions for a perceived cost savings. You should explore the issue in your own community to see what best works.

And that’s the important part.

EMS is in desperate need of public involvement. We are in desperate need of the public giving us more than a passing thought and actively taking an interest in how EMS is able to care for them and in their own healthcare. For too long, EMS and the Profession of Paramedicine have gone unnoticed. We’ve been suffering from public apathy as acutely as our patients suffer from heart attacks and strokes. Now perhaps more than ever, we need you to help us. We have to raise public awareness and work with our communities to provide the best possible service and the best possible patient outcomes.

Within the industry, there have emerged a few powerful ideas that could have far reaching impact not only upon EMS, but upon the entire healthcare system. Loosely entitled “EMS 2.0”, the ideas have come forth from street-level paramedics and EMTs and represent a “reboot” of the entire spectrum of how we do our work. Imagine if a few regulatory and educational changes could save billions in overall healthcare costs. Imagine if paramedics could improve access to primary healthcare for millions of underserved citizens catching and screening out serious disease before they even result in an acute emergency. It would be game changing, and it has a very real possibility of happening if the public would pay attention to us. It’s your future we’re trying to improve. It’s your health that motivates us to get out of bed at all hours to care for you. By your taking an interest in what we have to say, you could improve the health of your community many times over.

Here’s what you can do. First off, speak with your local EMS provider to see what their immediate needs are. In many communities, EMS is understaffed and underfunded. When was the last time you saw your community’s public works or police departments holding a bake sale to raise operational funds or to buy a new bulldozer or ammunition? Fire departments and EMS agencies do it all the time. Learn about how EMS is provided in surrounding communities and in communities of like size in your state and region. Talk with your healthcare providers and community leaders to ensure that their commitments to EMS reflect the lifesaving importance of EMS care. Local politics kill quality in EMS, communities need to tell their politicians to stop petty squabbles and focus on what is truly important. Learn the issues and listen to the people out on the street providing care.

Another good resource for the public to learn about EMS is to look at industry-specific information provided in the trade journals, online sites, and the EMS blogosphere. Whatever the local flavor of EMS that has developed in your community may be, there may be a better option out there. In fact, there probably is a better way and community members need to demand these better ways from their local EMS service or find, expose, and change local political factors that keep new and more efficient operations away from their local service. Medicine changes, so do best practices, and the public needs to demand the best from their EMS providers. Learn what the best truly is. In discussions with local politicos, scare tactics tend to run the argument. Educate yourself on the issues so that you can make the best possible decisions for your EMS providers and for your community.

For more information:

Http://www.JEMS.com – The Journal of Emergency Medical Services

Http://www.EMSresponder.com – EMS Magazine

Http://www.LifeUnderTheLights.com – The Author of this articles industry-specific EMS blog

Http://www.ChroniclesOfEMS.com – A new television show and videocast being produced by street Paramedics trying to explore EMS in an entertaining and informative way. This could be considered the “Face of EMS 2.0”

———————————————————————–

The author, Chris Kaiser, is a nationally registered Emergency Medical Technician-Paramedic licensed in multiple states. He has been providing EMS for over a decade and is a writer and speaker on EMS issues. More from Chris can be found at Http://www.LifeUnderTheLights.com

Posted by on May 15, 2010 • Filed under: Ambulance, ckemtp, Emergency Medical Services, EMS, ems 2.0, EMS Health & Safety, EMS Management, EMS Topics, EMS week, ems week 2010, Paramedic

EMS Week 2010 – Sent to the Newspaper

19 comments

I wrote this post for publishing in my community’s local newspaper. You may wish to send it to yours as well. It’s a generic “EMS Needs Your Support” piece. It might work for any time of the year, but it’s customized for EMS week 2010.

————————————————–

“Anytime. Anywhere. We’ll Be There” National EMS Week 2010

National Emergency Medical Services Week or “EMS Week” 2010 is coming up this year on May 16th through May 22nd. It is a time to think about the people whom our communities rely on to help us when the unthinkable happens. Every day in our community and in communities like ours throughout the nation, emergencies happen to people just like you and I. These local emergencies may not get the press coverage that the big disasters happening thousands of miles away receive, but to our friends and neighbors these day-to-day emergencies can be just as dangerous and deadly. We rely upon Emergency Medical Technicians (EMTs) and Paramedics to respond and make a difference in our lives. No matter the need, no matter the call, EMS stands ready to serve you.

Logo for EMS Week 2010 - from ACEP

Logo for EMS Week 2010 - from ACEP

EMS is at once the most iconic and visible part of the emergency healthcare system. It is also probably the most misunderstood. Almost everyone can recognize an ambulance and most people have an idea of its purpose. However people rarely give thought to the capabilities and education of the people working inside of it. EMTs and Paramedics have long since evolved from their humble beginnings as simply a fast ride to the hospital. Today’s ambulances are highly specialized mobile intensive care units and today’s EMT attends hundreds of hours of classroom education for their initial certification. Paramedics, the highest level of field medical providers, attend thousands of hours of initial education and internship time and must be masters of acute care. Not only that, but EMTs and Paramedics alike must recertify their license every few years and must attend hundreds more hours of continuing education to achieve their recertification. This training covers all aspects of acute emergency care and is quite intense and rigorous.

Today’s EMS system, with Paramedics and EMTs working in tandem, brings the first hour of Emergency Room care to the patient’s side no matter where the patient may be. EMS focuses upon providing immediate stabilizing care that stops or slows the progression of the acute disease process or damage from any injury, protects the patient from further aggravation of the condition, and impacts their long-term continuity of care. This care reduces Mortality, or loss of life, as well as Morbidity, or future quality of life. Calling 911 during a medical emergency produces better outcomes than does simply driving a seriously ill or injured person to a hospital. Early intervention in cases such as a heart attack or stroke can mean the difference between those conditions leading to long-term disability or a full recovery.

Every community in our region has emergency ambulance services available at a moment’s notice that are simply a 911 call away. Some communities provide Basic Life Support ambulances, with EMT level personnel. These ambulances are supported by Advanced Life Support ambulances and units staffed by Paramedics that can respond with the Basic ambulances to provide advanced level Paramedic care. It is important for people within our community to ask questions and get to know the people responding to their calls for help. Learn about their capabilities and their needs. Pitch in and help where you can. EMS people have always been the absolute masters of doing anything with nothing but we are desperately in need of the support and attention of the communities we serve. It is common for community members to not think about their local ambulance services until the time that they need their services however, EMS needs your support. Americans have always been massively charitable towards disasters happening thousands of miles away when images from them flood our television screens and newspapers, but rarely does that same charity flow to their local emergency responders who are taking care of our friends and neighbors. Your local EMS service needs your support to maintain high-levels of lifesaving service in your own communities. You can directly impact the service that your local EMS can give to your friends, your neighbors, your loved-ones, and even yourself. 

Get informed, get involved, pitch in, and help us help you.

The official theme for EMS week 2010 is “Anytime. Anywhere. We’ll Be There.” EMS has made the commitment to be there for you. This week, please think about how you can be there for EMS. The impact of your support for EMS translates directly back into improving the lives of the people in our communities. As the saying goes, the life you save may be your own.

Respectfully,

Chris Kaiser NREMT-P

www.LifeUnderTheLights.com

Posted by on May 14, 2010 • Filed under: 911, Administration & Leadership, Ambulance, ckemtp, Emergency Medical Services, EMS, EMS Management, EMS Topics, EMS week, ems week 2010, Paramedic, politics, profession, professionalism, Uncategorized

EMS Week 2010 – Thank You Letter from Management to EMS Crews

7 comments

This letter is free to copy and customize for your organization. It is a thank you letter from Management to Medics. I do not wish for any credits and you may use it as you see fit.

Oh, and if anyone who comes here wants a custom EMS Week 2010 letter written to fit their needs I will do it for free. Shoot me an e-mail at: Proems1@yahoo.com

——————————————–

Dear fellow EMS professionals,

EMS Week again is upon us and we’d like to take this chance to say thank you for all that you do. We know that everyone who works here puts in long hours and sleepless nights taking care of the needs of our community and meeting our (company)’s mission. We know that you’re dedicated, we know that you care, and we also know that you don’t get the amount of thanks that you deserve most of the time.

So today, we’d like to take this opportunity to say “Thank you” to everyone who works here. Thank you for your time. Thank you for your dedication. Thank you for your caring, your compassion, and your devotion to patient care. Thank you for working long shifts and for holding over to cover late calls. Thank you for taking time away from your families to keep our trucks on the streets for our communities 24/7. Thank you for thinking on your feet to solve new problems for our patients. Thank you for comforting families. Thank you for comforting the community. Thank you for risking your safety. Thank you for your bravery. Thank you for your commitment. Thank you for more than we have space to thank you for. Thank you for more than we know how to thank you for.

EMS Week is an opportunity for the public to recognize what we do out there every day. It’s an opportunity for us to showcase our talents, to let the public know how to use us, when to use us, and why to use us. It’s an opportunity for us to connect with our communities and for them to connect with us. What we do is important. EMS is a necessary service that is vital for our community and the nation. EMTs and Paramedics are the healthcare safety net for all of us. We’re there for everyone when they need them, on their terms, doing what’s best for them. We come to them, meet them as they are, and give them the best that we have to offer. We should use this week to reinforce that, and to improve our relationship with them.

In closing, EMS Week isn’t quite up to the task of thanking heroes. In reality, nothing is. Please know that no matter what happens, we know that you work hard and that you care. We know what you are accomplishing out there and we give you our respect. We give you our sincere thanks. We pledge to support you as best as we are able and we know that you’ll continue to give us your best.

Respectfully,

Management of Some Ambulance Company Somewhere

http://www.LifeUnderTheLights.com

————————————————

Just change it to suit your needs. Rework it as you see fit. It’s free to use and to modify. Do me a favor and leave a comment, anonymous if you’d like, about your using it.

Posted by on May 4, 2010 • Filed under: Administration & Leadership, Command & Leadership, Emergency Medical Services, EMS, EMS Health & Safety, EMS Management, EMS pep talk, EMS Topics, EMS week, ems week 2010, Fire Rescue Topics, Management, Paramedic
Random Pages Created By Best Accountant Services