Skip to content

Archives for ems-pay-sucks

See all posts in the network tagged with ems-pay-sucks

Vive la solidarité! Something we have in common with our French friends

1 comment

Spoiler alert: There are a LOT of French jokes in this one. A LOT of them. You’ve been warned.

This should come as relief to those of you that are tired of measuring your suction catheters in “freedoms” instead of in French. While I was researching the French model of EMS delivery for the post I wrote last week (Hypocritically Speaking – My opinions about EMS models and philosophies) I stumbled across something in the Wikipedia article that made me want to raise a baguette in solidarity to our cheese-eating friends. You might just agree.

It is of note that the French model of EMS delivery involves physicians in all levels of the system. Unlike the American model, where physicians provide

oversight and only rarely respond to scenes, in France physicians are included everywhere from taking calls in the dispatch center to actively responding to scenes and taking care of patients. Their system is different than ours in many ways other than this, but the physician thing is pretty big. I’d always guessed that a system like that could only exist in the realm of near-total government funding, considering they’ve surrendered to the idea of socialized medicine over there. (Hey now, that was a French joke, not an American political statement. Cool your fondue)

But then, in the Wikipedia article, I read this:

“The situation is further complicated by the fact that the physicians staffing the SMUR units are among the lowest-paid in Europe. Although salaries have recently improved somewhat, in 2002 it was reported that these physicians, who are, for the most part, full-time employees of public hospitals, had a starting salary of only €1300 (£833; $1278) per month.[14] This economic reality has resulted in understandably high turnover and some difficulty in staffing positions. It has been suggested, however, that the recognition of emergency medicine as an in-hospital specialty in France and elsewhere in Europe is likely to result in the evolution of that system towards more comprehensive in-hospital emergency services.”

Garcon! Bring me my beret and your finest, cheapest cabernet sauvignon! It turns out that the low pay, little respect, and feeling that “once we’re viewed as a specialty the conditions will improve” isn’t limited to just this side of the Atlantic. Maybe if we’re both underpaid for taking care of sick people we might have other things in common. Maybe they can learn to like our cheap, watered-down beer and we can learn to like their stinky cheeses. Maybe there’s a common theme to EMS around the world that binds us all together. Maybe, just maybe, I can start calling my burn patients “French toast” and they can call their obese heart attack victims an “American Special”.

 

Or maybe not…

C’est la Vie, eh?

Posted by on April 18, 2012 • Filed under: appreciation, Economics, Emergency Medical Services, EMS, ems 2.0, EMS Management, EMS pay sucks, EMS Topics, humor, Paramedic, paramedic salary

Colorado CRNAs Vs. Virginia Physicians? An interesting feud for EMS

24 comments

This article came across my Twitter stream this morning. It regards a letter sent to the Centers for Medicare/Medicaid Services by the Governor of Colorado informing them that in some Colorado hospitals it is now acceptable for Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetists to work independently of physician supervision.

The article, which is in the form of a letter written to the editor of The Aspen Times, is written by a Dr. Paul Rein who is the President of the Virginia Anesthesia and Peroperative Care Specialists. He takes issue with the lack of physician oversight and is “quite concerned” about it.

I think that the letter is important for EMS people to read. Especially us EMS people that are looking at how to expand our profession, grow our scope of practice, and expand our skill sets. It shows that there are struggles over these kinds of boundary and oversight issues all over the healthcare arena and that the politics and power struggles aren’t just limited to those of us that ride ‘round in ambulances.

The full text of the letter can be found here at The Aspen Times: http://www.aspentimes.com/article/20101004/LETTER/101009942/1020&ParentProfile=1061

The parallels I can draw from this issue to EMS are striking and enlightening. Here are some of the parts of the letter that I found the most interesting:

“A nurse anesthetist is an advanced practice registered nurse who has received special training to administer anesthesia, usually being supervised by an anesthesiologist. Anesthesiologists are physicians who, after medical school, receive an additional four to five years of specialized training during residency. Not only do anesthesiologists function in the operating room but they are trained to medically evaluate patients prior to surgery and to take care of problems that may arise immediately after surgery. In a few small hospitals a nurse anesthetist may be supervised by the surgeon if there is no anesthesiologist.”

I was curious as to the educational standards of a Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetist and so I went to their National Association’s web site: Http://www.AANA.com – It says this:

“The requirements for becoming a Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetist (CRNA) mainly include having a bachelor’s degree in nursing, or other appropriate baccalaureate degree, Registered Nurse licensure, a minimum of 1 year acute care experience (ICU, ER for example), and the successful completion of both an accredited nurse anesthesia educational program and the certification examination.”

(Source: http://www.aana.com/BecomingCRNA.aspx?id=98&linkidentifier=id&itemid=98)

Huh.

Actually, I wasn’t familiar with the requirements for a CRNA before I read that, but it says that they have to have:

  • A four year degree in Something
  • Licensure as a Registered Nurse
  • A minimum of One Year Acute care experience
  • Completed an Accredited training program
  • A passing grade on the certification exam

I was curious, so I popped on over to Salary.com and typed in “Registered Nurse Anesthetist” in my own zip code for a base salary search. I found that they start out at $131,000 and top out at over $170,000 in my local area.

Then, after giving serious consideration to changing this blog from “Life Under the Lights” of Fire Trucks and Ambulances to “Life Under the Lights” of an Operating Room, I decided to point something else out about the differences and similarities of a Paramedic and a CRNA.

 “The didactic curricula of nurse anesthesia programs are governed by COA standards and provide students the scientific, clinical, and professional foundation upon which to build sound and safe clinical practice. The basic nurse anesthesia academic curriculum and prerequisite courses focus on coursework in anesthesia practice: pharmacology of anesthetic agents and adjuvant drugs including concepts in chemistry and biochemistry (105 contact hours); anatomy, physiology, and pathophysiology (135 contact hours); professional aspects of nurse anesthesia practice (45 contact hours); basic and advanced principles (sic) of anesthesia practice including physics, equipment, technology (sic)  and pain management (105 contact hours); research (30 contact hours); and clinical correlation conferences (45 contact hours).

Most programs exceed these minimum requirements. In addition, many require study in methods of scientific inquiry and statistics, as well as active participation in student-generated and faculty-sponsored research.

Clinical residencies afford supervised experiences for students during which time they are able to learn anesthesia techniques, test theory, and apply knowledge to clinical problems. Students gain experience with patients of all ages who require medical, surgical, obstetrical, dental, and pediatric interventions. The results of a 1998 survey of program directors show that nurse anesthesia programs provide an average of 1,595 hours of clinical experience for each student.”

(Again, from http://www.AANA.com – the emphasis is mine)

Remember that the CRNA’s have a Bachelor’s Degree and a RN license prior to beginning their training. This is different from the Paramedic curriculum. We have hour requirements as well:

“The emphasis of paramedic education should be competence of the graduate, not the amount of education that they receive. The time involved in educating a paramedic to an acceptable level of competence depends on many variables. Based on the experience in the pilot and field testing of this curriculum, it is expected that the average program, with average students, will achieve average results in approximately 1000-1200 hours of instruction. The length of this course will vary according to a number of factors, including, but not limited to:

-student’s basic academic skills competence

-faculty to student ratio

-student motivation

-the student’s prior emergency/health care experience

-prior academic achievements

-clinical and academic resources available

-quality of the overall educational program”

 (Source: Http://www.EMS.gov – Thanks to Chris Webster, Sam Bradley, Greg Friese and Kevin Reiter)

Not that the above is related to the article I read, I mean it’s saying that people with a BS degree in something, a medical license, and what amounts to a little more than an EMT-B class plus an EMT-P class from an accredited school make an average of $150k… but I digress.

Back to the article, Dr Rein has this to say about CRNAs:

“It is interesting to note that the United States is the only westernized country in the world that allows nurses to administer anesthesia unsupervised. Countries such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Japan and Israel, just to name a few, have no nurses administering anesthesia. In some European countries there are a few nurse anesthetists who work under the strict supervision of a physician.”

He continues and says this:

“So what’s up with us? Well, it seems that the American Association of Nurse Anesthetists have convinced our government in Washington that unsupervised nurses are just as safe as a physician. They point to the fact that there are no comparative studies to show they are not. The reason there are no studies is that it would be unethical to perform such a study in which some people get a physician and some do not. Can you imagine a patient agreeing to participate in such a study?”

Can you imagine indeed?

Dr Rein is right when he says in the letter that Anesthesia is a Medical profession and is a specialty of physicians for a reason. When he says “Just because we have made it safe is no reason to take it for granted”, he’s right as well. Anesthesia is dangerous for the untrained and inexperienced provider and it is a specialty not to be taken lightly. However, where’s the line? Is this an attempt by the”Virginia Anesthesia and Peroperative Care Specialists” to fire a shot at the “American Association of Nurse Anesthetists?” Are Doctor Anesthesiologists afraid of losing jobs to the nurses? Where is the line where patient safety is best maintained while being most cost-effective and efficient?

If this doesn’t provide incentive to you to think about requiring a degree for Paramedics, I don’t quite know what will. I’m not doing this job for the money and neither are you, but does that make us any more or less moral than a CRNA who “Isn’t doing his/her job for the money” either, but still makes a ton more of it than any paramedic I know?

You could change the names of the players in this argument, fiddle just a bit with some of the details, and change this into one of a thousand other feuds going on under the healthcare umbrella. This is the same story that paramedics face when we’re trying to get new skills, new techniques, more money, and more responsibility. While I’m not taking a stand on the CRNA/MD issue because it’s not my specialty, I’m offering up this debate as a study in professional growth and conflict between two of the myriad of medical camps out there. As we push EMS forward, grow as a profession, and promote the EMS 2.0 agenda, learning from things like this will be of value to us all.

————————————————–

Thanks to the following for their contributions:

Posted by on October 4, 2010 • Filed under: ckemtp rants, Emergency Medical Services, EMS, ems 2.0, ems education, EMS pay sucks, EMS pep talk, EMS Topics, EMS training, medical ethics, News, Paramedic, paramedic education, Patient Management, physician, politics, potential, profession, Training & Development, Uncategorized

EMS Pay Sucks!! (Part 4) – We Control the Market

7 comments

I read a short article in Entrepreneur Magazine (to which I subscribe) that had a story about a sign hanging in a shop somewhere that said this:

“Low Price. High Quality. Good Service.  – Pick two”

The saying goes that consumers can pick two of the above things that they feel are most important to them in their buying decisions. It also implies that businesses can focus and compete on two of the three, but they can’t do them all.

I agree with the sign. It shows in the fact that there are multiple outlets in the marketplace to purchase similar goods and services. If you’re price sensitive and don’t want the highest quality of furniture you buy from Ikea and assemble your purchase yourself. If you’re always after the best quality you go to a custom furniture builder who would be more than happy to deliver and install for the price you’re paying him. As always, if you as a consumer do not like what the merchant has for sale you “vote with your feet” and go somewhere else to spend your hard-earned money.

And that is how “the market” works. Businesses compete with one another for your patronage and this competition keeps their prices as low as the consumers are willing to pay for the level of quality they are willing to accept. People are willing to accept lesser quality products for lower cost as much as they are willing to pay more for better quality. Service and support plays a role in there too as nobody wants to get burned on a deal, product, or service. If your widget store has exactly the same quality of widgets for sale with the same service as the widget store across the street, people are going to buy the widgets at the lowest cost. Change any of the price/quality/service variables and the sales will follow where the consumer sees the best value. Of course I’ve oversimplified this a bit as the system we call “the free market” is infinitely nuanced in its simplicity, but this is indeed an EMS article. So don’t even get me started on that Adam Smith guy and his sleight of hand.

So why am I bringing forth this short little explanation of the free market? It’s because the ambulance industry is a service provider. Unfortunately (or fortunately if you prefer) we’re not entirely bent upon the whims of the marketplace due to the governmental regulations that set our price, control our service types, and dictate how we run our businesses. You probably know that Ambulance Services are “service providers” as they provide a service to our patients in exchange for fees paid for that service (ha!) and their tax revenues, but did you know that the Paramedics and EMTs are collectively a “service provider” for the ambulance industry itself?

Follow me here for a bit. If you separate out the collective “ambulance industry” from the collective EMTs and Paramedics making up the Profession of Paramedicine, you can see that there are two separate groups functioning in tandem. While we’ve always been inseparable and have been defined as one collective group, I suggest that we are really two entities. The Profession (Defined here as the Paramedics and EMTs together) and the ambulance industry (defined as the places we most usually work).The ambulance industry needs a service from the Profession in the form of us providing them with bodies to run their trucks, and we need them to employ us. If you were to take this thought further, we as members of the Profession compete with one another to provide our services to the various ambulance companies in the form of applying to and accepting positions with them under whatever conditions they set for us. They set the pay rates, benefits, shift schedules, etc and we paramedics compete with each other for the positions… usually accepting less compensation than we wished to receive as a condition of being employed.

Historically, our profession has competed on price as evidenced by the fact that our pay rates are much lower than we want to accept for our services. According to the above analogy, as we push our price lower either the quality of our education and skills or our level of service is going to suffer for it. One needs to look no further than their own paycheck to see that the pay is terrible. One also needs to look no further than their local “Medic Mill” school that exists solely to pump out EMTs and Paramedics with “a pulse and an EMT card” at the lowest possible cost with the absolute minimum level of education. We’ve become the Wal-Mart of ambulance staff, always rolling back our prices and lowering quality to encourage more and more demand.

If I have any liberty to speak to our profession I ask that today we all make the collective decision to compete on “High Quality” and “Good Service”, leaving “Low Price” behind. Frankly it hasn’t worked for our profession to provide our services for the low bid price. The subsequent drop in the quality of our education and services isn’t the best for our patients. We’ll always compete amongst each other to provide our services to the ambulance industry (I.E. apply for jobs) but if we all accept that we’re no longer competing on “Low Price”, we’ll all reap the benefits. Our patients will as well.

I suggest that we begin to “vote with our feet” more often in our quest for employment. If there are multiple ambulance services in your town, pick the one that offers the best pay and benefits and apply there for your employment. If and when you get hired, work like heck to make them the dominant ambulance company in the marketplace. Once the other competitors realize that the ambulance service with the best pay and benefits is gaining a competitive advantage, they’ll change… or be forced out of business. What you’ll begin to see is that the ambulance service that pays the best will begin to be able to “get what they pay for” from the profession in the fact that they will only hire the best qualified among us. Therefore we’ll begin to have to compete on quality and service to get hired for the best pay. We’ll no longer be competing on price alone. You’ll have to put more effort into the profession, but you’ll reap the rewards in terms of higher pay and benefits.

In addition, we need more Medicpreneurs. I’ve said before that the only way to make a lot of money in this game is to be the owner of a service. What’s to say that you can’t start your own ambulance company to put your boss out of business? Hire the best of your coworkers and pay them what they deserve. Do your best and work very hard every day. Soon enough, you’ll win if you can beat the market. You’ll be helping your profession and yourself as well.

When we begin to see the collective power that we wield as a profession in the marketplace we can begin to change the marketplace to fit our wishes. If we want EMS 2.0 to go ahead and get here already we’ve got to collectively become aware of our power and our duty to control the playing field. We haven’t won yet, let’s change the rules so we do. We owe it to our families, our patients, and everyone who depends on us. Wake Up EMS. We control the game here folks… We just have to realize the power we have together.

Low Price. High Quality. Good Service – Which two do you pick?

Posted by on January 7, 2010 • Filed under: Administration & Leadership, change, Economics, Emergency Medical Services, EMS, ems 2.0, EMS Management, EMS pay sucks, EMS rant, ems salary, EMS Topics, Funding & Staffing, paramedic salary, politics, potential, salary, US economy

Fiddling While Rome Burns – The “Ambulance Industry”

14 comments

Allow me if you will to allude to some Roman history here. I know that it’s a little heavy for an EMS blog but if you would please search the dusty recesses of your memories to think of the Roman Emperor Nero, it would help this post. You know, the one who “fiddled while Rome burned”

I am way oversimplifying this, but the way that I remember the story was that Rome was being swept by the “Great Fire of Rome” that burned for days and decimated the city. Popular legend has it that Nero, unconcerned with the plight of his citizenry, played the fiddle while the city was burning.

 (Although, the MOST TRUSTWORTHY SITE ON THE INTERNET *Other than Mine* has this on the subject: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Fire_of_Rome)

Recent events and some things that I’ve been reading lately have brought some EMS issues to light in my mind, and thoughts about good ol’ Nero have popped into my head.

Are we Fiddling while Rome Burns?

There’s a few competing EMS system design models out there that have various people in their camps. Mention the virtues of one over another and you will get passionate and snarky responses from the various members of these camps. Trash Fire Based EMS and you’ll get a ton of people that will take a break from lifting weights and will bombard you with reasons while Fire Based EMS is awesome while wearing their T-Shirts emblazoned with “FIRE RULES!!”. Mention that 3rd service and not-for-profit EMS may have their downfalls and the EMS Chess Club will bring forth obscure research that shows how much better they are for the patients than everyone else is. Trash Private-for-profit EMS and um, the employees thereof will trash it right along with you and their management will be too busy putting out fires to care.

Try as you might to convince me that one is better than the other and I’ll agree with you on some points and disagree with you on others. I will only endorse what I call “EMS based EMS”, which is EMS provided by truly dedicated caregivers who base their decisions and actions simply upon what is best for their patients and their communities. I have my beef with fire based services that place protecting firefighter jobs and the “fun” stuff involving spraying water on things that happen to be on fire over solid patient care. I have my beef with private-for-profit services that always default to the bottom line, and admittedly, I have a bias towards third service and not-for-profit EMS agencies. However, no one system has ever proven to be a good fit for every community, none are inherently evil, and other professions find their fit within lots of configurations.

If the system design models out there are really locked into a competition for the soul of EMS then they’ve all got a lot of work to do. In this piece, I’m going to ignore patient outcomes, efficient use of tax money, and all of the stuff that I usually talk about… and focus on one thing and one thing only.

The way EMS people are treated by the competing systems will probably decide this debate we’ve got going on here. The model that treats the paramedics the best will win and will take over the industry. Why wouldn’t it? What paramedic with half of a brain would continue to work in a service model that didn’t pay and treat them the best?

Here in Northern Illinois, there are very few options for a paramedic that doesn’t want to do Fire Based EMS for one reason or another. The few options that there are don’t pay nearly as well as the fire-based groups and this creates an endless revolving door of young paramedics entering the system, working the “privates” for a while, while trying to get a “real job” with a fire department. The private services suffer for it, and the fire based services reap the benefits while fostering a system that (gulp, here it comes) focuses less on the healthcare and more on the fun stuff.

So I challenge the private, third-service, and not-for-profit services out there with my next statement.

You’re fiddling while Rome burns.

If you aren’t out there doing your absolute damndest to treat your employees well and pay them what they deserve, you’re failing. You push your employees away. You push the best and brightest into other professions and into fire-based EMS which hands down has the best pay and benefit structure. Your lack of interest in caring for your caregivers is killing our profession. You fiddle whilst complaining about decreased reimbursements and failing to do anything about it. You fiddle whilst focusing on minutia like stupid rules and regulations that degrade the dignity of the adults who work for you. You fiddle while worrying about protecting your jurisdictional boundaries and contracts while they’re eroded away by the constant stream of departing employees.

Nero could have been an ambulance manager in some of the services I’ve been to, worked for, and observed from the outside. Could he be you?

You have got to find a way to pay your people better. I don’t know exactly how it’s going to happen either, but it has to be priority #1 for every ambulance manager out there. Trust me, if you don’t do it you will find that your capital city has burned to the ground. You will lose your empire and it will not come back. If you aren’t out there doing every possible thing you can to keep your employees as happy as you can get them, you’re fiddling, and you’re failing our profession.

This blog has a lot of content on it that explores new revenue sources for ambulance organizations already. Coming soon: Ways for each individual EMS professional to take control of our own income potential, own our profession, and improve our care to our patients. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again folks, hang on cuz it’s going to get fun.

Posted by on January 6, 2010 • Filed under: 911 fail, Administration & Leadership, change, ckemtp rants, Command & Leadership, Economics, Emergency Medical Services, EMS, ems 2.0, EMS Health & Safety, EMS Management, EMS paramedics, EMS pay sucks, EMS rant, ems salary, EMS Topics, Funding & Staffing, Management, Paramedic, paramedic salary, politics, profession

EMS Pay Sucks!! (part 3) – Who or What is at fault here!?

21 comments

Welcome back to the “Life Under the Lights Bar and Grille”, your local dive bar filled with lousy food, tepid beer, bad ambiance, and great friends. Like any local Midwestern dive bar, it’s a come-as-you-are-and-sit-on-down-and-hang-with-your-buds kinda place. A conversation has broken out on the topic of “EMS Pay Sucks!! Let’s DO something about it!!” and me, your local blogger has decided to write a series of posts explaining the issues as I see them.

So, if you haven’t been here to read the last two, I suggest you go back and read them before you read this. If you don’t, well then that’s your choice. It’s a pretty informal place we have here.

Part 1: “EMS Pay Sucks!! Let’s DO something about it!!”

Part 2: “EMS Pay Sucks!! (Part 2) – Identifying the Problem

————————————————

In the last two parts here at the Life Under the Lights Bar and Grille, we’ve established that the time for talking about the issues is over, and that all EMS people need to band together in an effort to affect the pay rates in our profession. We’ve also established that this is a very complex issue and it can pretty much be said that if this was going to be easy, that it would have been done already. 

If you’ve read the comments that I’ve gotten on the other posts in this series, this is a hot issue with vastly different valid arguments that have been brought forth by people I respect. While I agree with a lot of what has been said, I would like to boil the issue down a bit further than it has been brought in the comments section and in the information that I have previously been exposed to. Basically it’s like this: By examining other occupations that are well compensated for their skills, we can examine the position we find ourselves in with our profession.

I think that it works like this, Well Compensated Occupations have these things in common:

  1. There is a medium-to-high barrier to entry – Whether by education requirements, location, or the unpleasant nature of the work, there is a barrier to entering the occupation that requires work and/or an affinity for the location or work involved to get into the field. Not everyone can do it, the people that do it but cannot do it well easily fail out, and the people that can hang around to do the work are rewarded for it. Look at Dental Hygienists, teachers, and IT professionals.
  2. There has to be a perceived value in compensating the people in the field at a higher rate to achieve higher performance – Look at the salaries of professional athletes and CEOs. They create value intensively based upon their knowledge and talents and the better they are at doing what they do, the more value they create for their employers. Think of it, if you could raise profits in your company $5million per year, wouldn’t that be worth an extra $1million per year in payroll?
  3. The Industry they work in turns significant revenue overall – You could be the most talented Ice Sculptor in the world, but if you couldn’t find a market to sell your ice sculptures to before they melted, you wouldn’t make any money at it. Nor would you if you were the executive chef at a greasy spoon. Sure, you’d have the same job title, “Sculptor” or “Executive Chef”, as a sculptor that worked with Marble and Gold, or an executive chef that worked at a very fancy restaurant in downtown New York… but since the places you worked for weren’t making any money, you couldn’t possibly be paid very much; Even if you were as highly educated and more talented than your counterparts at the fancy joints.

I think that overall, point number three above sets the tone for us. Our industry doesn’t make much money, therefore, no matter how caring, compassionate, qualified, or talented we are, we won’t be making much for working in it. It’s pretty much that simple. Sure, some salaries are artificially inflated due to varying degrees support from governmentally levied taxes, subscriptions, or corporate support but if we were to stand solely on our current business model, the “fee for service” model where we only get paid if we transport and most of our customers do not pay then we’d all be much poorer than we are now. In fact, most ambulance services would be out of business.

I’ve heard the argument that one form of EMS delivery or another is “Ruining it for the rest of us” with people in one camp bemoaning “the privates” for being all about profit and not paying their employees due to the money grubbing nature of their owners, and people in another camp bemoaning “The Fire Guys” for holding the profession back and keeping educational standards low so that their fire guys don’t have to get the advanced education that would be required of other well-compensated healthcare professions. People in almost every camp bemoan the volunteers saying “If they do it for free, how can we expect people to pay for us!?”

Well, while all of those arguments sound plausible enough and may hold some truth to them, they’re crap when you really look at them. Should all restaurants be Governmentally based like the Fire Departments because then pay would be equal across the board? Right now people that work in Government cafeterias earn better money than those working in Flo and Gino’s Diner down on 5th St. Flo and Gino’s Diner is *ruining* the restaurant business, right? How about IT professionals? People that work doing advanced networking at IBM earn WAY more than the people that do networking at your local newspaper office. Does that mean that smaller operations, and not large companies are *ruining* the IT business? Waitresses that work in Casinos and at Hooters make way more than do waitresses that work at your local fancy chain restaurant… Is TGI Friday’s to blame?

Every business, governmental organization, or organization on Earth in one way or another, is a system that takes in money and other resources, does something to it, and then spits out something with perceived value to it. The military takes in vast amounts of money, manpower, and other resources and doesn’t make a dime doing it. Its value is in protecting the interests of the society that funds it and therefore it’s usually a governmental pursuit. Diamond mining takes a lot of resources and money to perform as well, but since diamonds are sold for huge profits, it’s a pursuit of the private sector. I don’t get much into politics on my blog, but I can say that personal experience has taught me that capitalism works and that government rarely does anything better, more efficiently, or faster than does the private sector. Government bodies, by definition, rarely are any good at staying within budget, let alone making a profit, and when they do try to make a profit, they fail spectacularly… e.g. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. By definition, the Fire Service doesn’t make a profit, and they have branched out into providing EMS in a lot of cases, solely to get a piece of the transport revenue to support their other operations. Private services, by definition, are doing the same… Neither one is inherently evil.

And neither are volunteers. I work in rural areas and I’ve always lived in them. Heck, my hometown had more cows than people and yet I still needed someone to bring the ambulance whenever the farm hand got trampled on by Bessy. Rural areas have voluntary agencies where community members step up to the plate to provide services out of the humanity they have to their neighbors and also because of the fact that if they didn’t do it, nobody would. That’s not evil, it’s just a reality of rural life. (There are benefits to the volunteer services that I will expound upon in a later article not in this series as well.) (Disclosure, I’m a volunteer paramedic and dang proud of it).

A paramedic blogger who I really respect, TOTWTYTR (Who writes the blog “Too Old to Work, Too Young to Retire”) offered the following comment on my post “Paramedics Providing Physicals? Decreasing Healthcare Costs and Improving Patient Care – EMS 2.0”

“Chris, you seem to be intent on finding more for paramedics to do. I’m not sure why, when there is a “shortage” of paramedics we need a heavier work load or “expanded scope”. We’re also likely intruding into someone else’s work space in the process.

Nor can I say that giving more for the same amount of money of benefit to the profession. In fact, I’d opine that it will have the opposite effect.”

His argument looks good too, when you don’t share the same definition of a business as I do and you don’t view EMS as a business, which it is. Remember my third point above, the one about industries that don’t make any revenue being unable to compensate their employees at a reasonable rate. My idea in the above post, to have a paramedic provide your next annual physical, is another service that we can use to sell for a profit. The belief that we can survive solely on transport revenue has not panned out when most of our transport revenue is based upon dwindling government reimbursement through Medicare and Medicaid (and the looming universalization of healthcare) and the tax revenues we rely on from local governments is starting to be eaten away. We have to find new sources to generate revenue from. We’ve got to compete in the marketplace to either do old things better and/or cheaper or do new things before anyone else does them. Our profession is not insulated from capitalism just because we layer ourselves in compassion.

So to end this long rant, I think that we can go a long way towards solving our pay problem by turning our attention to the three points above.

First, educational standards must be universally standardized, universally raised, and must be owned by our professional governing body. While we should probably never make a Master’s degree the entry point to ambulance work, it shouldn’t be a GED either. Probably some PE classes should be in there as well, or at least the ability to pass them. Go Get Educated!

Second, we have to educate the public about what it is that we do and why being good at it is important. If the public thinks that a volunteer service with a BLS response is adequate, then they’ve never laid there with a broken femur only to be bounced down a gravel road next to an EMT-Basic that can’t give them a squirt of Morphine. They’ve also never had their MI go into cardiogenic shock because the BLS volunteers couldn’t give them correct medications to mitigate the damage. They have to be shown convincing evidence of these facts before they will, and someone has to be our cheerleaders. Honestly, I’ve never seen an “EMS Cheerleader” or someone who was promoting the profession to the public, that hasn’t been skewered by their peers. Maybe NBC’s “Trauma” wasn’t the most accurate show in the world… but neither was “Top Gun” and we loved that movie and wanted to be a fighter pilot after seeing it (last week, again). Be an EMS Cheerleader in your community!

Third, your EMS service needs to go do something to make itself money. Figure out what you can do to boost revenue, and do it. Try new things. There are a lot of business ventures that have a good synergy with EMS.. Perhaps you could sell those little “I’ve fallen and I can’t get up” buttons and home-safety devices to the elderly in your community. Perhaps you could do home healthcare. Perhaps you could offer OSHA safety consulting to business and industry in your jurisdiction. All of these things are very much part of what we can, and probably will be doing in the future. Seek out New Ideas and Profitable Ventures!

I haven’t figured out the title to the next post in this series, but I’ll be writing it tomorrow. I’ve loved the debates that have been popping up in the comment’s section and I’m sorry that I haven’t jumped in there much as of yet. I’m just trying to keep my ideas to the main posts, and then I’ll come back and debate when I get out what I want to say. You all have been creating some great energy and while we’re not going to agree on this, I’ll say it again “Perfection is the Enemy of the Good Enough”. Complete agreement is not necessary for us to act upon a consensus.

Posted by on December 30, 2009 • Filed under: Administration & Leadership, change, ckemtp rants, Economics, Emergency Medical Services, EMS, ems 2.0, EMS Health & Safety, EMS Management, EMS pay sucks, EMS pep talk, ems salary, EMS Topics, Funding & Staffing, Paramedic, paramedic salary, politics, profession, salary

EMS Pay Sucks!! Part 2 – Identifying the problem

33 comments

Welcome back to the “Life Under the Lights Bar and Grille”, your local dive bar filled with lousy food, tepid beer, bad ambiance, and great friends. Like any local Midwestern dive bar, it’s a come-as-you-are-and-sit-on-down-and-hang-with-your-buds kinda place. A conversation has broken out on the topic of “EMS Pay Sucks!! Let’s DO something about it!!” and me, your local blogger has decided to write a series of posts explaining the issues as I see them.

 So, if you haven’t been here to read the last two, I suggest you go back and read them before you read this. If you don’t, well then that’s your choice. It’s a pretty informal place we have here.

 Part 1: “EMS Pay Sucks!! Let’s DO something about it!!”

Part 2: “EMS Pay Sucks!! (Part 2) – Identifying the Problem (you’re here)

Part 3: “EMS Pay Sucks!! (Part 3) – Who or what is at fault here?

———————

The way our country compensates its EMS personnel is an abomination. It’s almost criminal, it’s inhumane, and it’s just plain wrong. Paramedics and EMTs do not deserve to live at, near, or below the poverty line simply because they chose to make a career out of helping others. We do not deserve the shame of being struggling from paycheck to paycheck. We do not deserve the hardships of trying to raise a family and continuously have to explain to them just why it is we have to work so many hours and have such little in our paychecks to show for it.

I know that EMS compensation is frankly despicable… but you don’t have to take my word for it. There is a lot written on the subject that comes from some very credible sources. Some examples:

Favorite Quote (but the read the link to get even angrier):

“Paramedics

What they do: Paramedics respond to emergency situations and attempt to provide the necessary medical care, whether it involves transporting participants to a hospital or treating them on the scene.

Surprising salary: $27,070. Seeing as paramedics have high stress jobs that require them to be on call and ready to save lives at a moment’s notice, you might expect their mean annual salary to be higher.”

”Other workers in occupations that require quick and level-headed reactions to life-or-death situations are:

All those links work, by the way. Here’s a little pre-test question for you: Of those “occupations” listed above, which one is markedly the lowest paid??

I’ve been in full-time EMS for over ten years and currently work two-full time paramedic jobs. Not only do I feel the low wages, awful benefits, and long hours personally, but I also see what my coworkers go through with their lives and their families. What does one do when their calling is something so vital to the community, yet is so unappreciated financially that it hurts their families and their future?

In my travels throughout the nation I have had the chance to seek out and speak with EMS people in a lot of localities. I tend to visit odd places and I make it a point to seek out and get into conversations with interesting strangers. Luckily, all of the EMS people I know seem to fit the description of being “interesting”. I’ve heard them speak of the same problems that I’ve experienced. I’ve seen the pain and embarrassment in their eyes as they describe their love for the job and try to downplay the fact that they’re struggling financially. I’ve heard the same stories almost every time I’ve spoken with them. When they were young and new to the profession the long hours and low wages didn’t matter all that much to them… However, once they spend about five to ten years working the box they tend to experience the same struggles that I have. Spouses and Children don’t like it when the EMS person continues to work 100 hours a week to earn a paycheck that only comes close to covering the bills. They don’t like not having any disposable income. They don’t like the 24/7 demands of the job too much either. These facts rear their ugly heads when the EMS provider reaches a certain point in their life, and a career in EMS gets harder and harder to justify. Ever wonder why you don’t see many EMS professionals that have been continuously working full-time EMS for more than ten or so years? It’s for this reason. Sure there are a lot of exceptions, but I would think that the statistical clustering would bear this out. Eighteen-to-twenty year olds enter the profession, become family people around five-to-ten years later, and realize that the hours and the money they get for those hours are killing their family life… then they get other jobs, or stay in EMS and become very bitter about it.

So if I were to be asked to identify the problem using words that everyone could understand, I’d say this:

“The public is counting on the people in Emergency Medical Services to protect the lives of themselves and their loved ones. They then turn around and compensate them for this task at about the level they compensate fry cooks. They demand that there is a paramedic or EMT immediately available to them at all times to help them when the unthinkable happens, but they aren’t willing to pay them more than they do their bartender or waitress. People need advanced care immediately available to them in order to maintain the quality and presence of their lives after an emergency, and they need highly trained, experienced, and dedicated people to provide that care, but all that care seems to be worth to them is poverty-level income. What is wrong with our priorities?”

What is wrong with our priorities indeed.

I think that the above information is enough to identify that I think there is indeed a problem here. It’s an almost overwhelmingly complex problem as well. However, if it were an easy problem to fix, it would have been fixed by now. Fixing this has become mandatory for me, as it is mandatory for all of you. I’m writing this to contribute to the solutions that we’ll have to put into place, and by participating in this, you’ll be too. Over the next few days, I’ll be posting parts in this series, because I don’t think that one post will provide as many angles as I feel I need to.

One thing I do know, we’re going to act on what I put out here and on what you add to the discussion in the comments section and in your daily lives. We can no longer hope someone else will act. I ask every person who reads this to participate for our own well-being and the improvement of our profession. We’re not going to agree on everything, but “perfection is the enemy of the Good Enough”. Complete consensus is not necessary, action for our collective professional well-being is.

Coming tomorrow: EMS Pay Sucks!! Part 3 – Who or what is at fault here?

Posted by on December 29, 2009 • Filed under: 911 fail, Administration & Leadership, change, ckemtp rants, Economics, Emergency Medical Services, EMS, ems 2.0, EMS Health & Safety, EMS Management, EMS pay sucks, EMS rant, ems salary, EMS Topics, Funding & Staffing, Paramedic, paramedic salary, politics, salary

EMS Pay Sucks! Let’s do something about it

30 comments

We’re gonna have ourselves a little Audience Participation Exercise.

This whole blogging thing is a pretty intimate relationship, isn’t it? I mean, you all have your favorite bloggers that you regularly read and I’d be quite honored if you’d count me among them. I write straight from the front of my ambulance and I’ve been repaid by all of you for it by your sheer act of coming to read what I have to say. I rarely hold anything back from your eyes, and this is no exception to that rule.

So please, dear reader, humor me for a bit here while I pull you in to a pretend scenario. I’m a rural Midwestern guy and like any of my peers I like my dive bars. Of course, I’m a family man and I try to be a good one so I don’t frequent them very often anymore, but the one thing that I’ve always liked about them is the conversation that develops centered around the non-formal atmosphere that they hold. It’s pretty intense most times, usually brutally honest, and always entertaining as all get out. Everybody’s equal with a can o’ PBR in their hand. (or, diet pepsi for the young folk as we’re a family establishment) (no swearing either) (well, not much).

So let me invite you to the “Life Under the Lights Bar and Grille”. Coming soon to this little blog of mine is the beginning of my crusade to kick the current EMS pay rates and system thereof squarely in the behind. I’m frankly, mad as heck and I’m not going to take it anymore… well, at least as blogging is concerned as I still have to make a living, you know. Don’t get dressed up, come as you are, and let’s have a spirited conversation about why EMS people make such crappy money for doing what we do. I’ve got enough ideas on this topic to carry me through a few evenings of my wooden “free drink” nickels and I’d love to share some brutally honest conversation with the EMS folks in my audience that I think can make a difference in the quality of life for those who save lives. We need to, we have to, and we deserve to.

On duty personnel will be limited to a three-drink-maximum, as long as it’s coffee or a soft drink of their choice. We are consummate professionals, you know.

Starting tomorrow I’m going to be writing a few good rants on this topic. I’m holding back tonight because well, coffee lends itself to more coherent writing than does late night camaraderie enhancement beverages. However, if you all would do me the honor of getting started by reading the following posts of mine:

Read this too if you want to get mad:

http://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes292041.htm – The US Bureau of Labor Statistics Paramedic Salary page

————————

I’m turning this into a 5 or 6 part series, so here they are:

EMS Pay Sucks!! (part 2): Identifying the Problem

EMS Pay Sucks!! (part 3): Who or What is at Fault here?

Posted by on December 28, 2009 • Filed under: ckemtp rants, Economics, Emergency Medical Services, EMS, ems 2.0, EMS Health & Safety, EMS pay sucks, ems salary, EMS Topics, Funding & Staffing, Paramedic, politics, potential, US economy
Random Plugin By Best Account Services