Skip to content


Hangover Heaven? WHY ARE WE NOT DOING THIS!?!?

6 comments

I came across a new business today while I was casually wandering around the Internet and I just absolutely had to share it with the EMS crowd. The company, called "Hangover Heaven" (www.HangoverHeaven.com) is set to open April 14th, 2011 in Las Vegas, NV. (Where else?)

If you haven't already clicked the link their business model is that they have a bus that drives around the strip, picking up the hungover masses, and providing "a small IV in your arm that provides the necessary treatment to continue the party or just get back to your normal self." They have two packages, the "Redemption" package for $90 that provides IV hydration only, and the "Salvation" Package for $150 that provides relief through their "Proprietary treatment" which they say contains intravenous hydration, an anti-emetic, an anti-inflammatory medication, and a "Vitamin supplement" package.

You should really read their website yourself. Some copywriter did a great job of selling what I can only surmise to be a banana bag, ondansetron, and toradol. Those meds and the IV fluid will most probably cure any hangover quite handily. While I think this is a bit cheesy… I've got nothing but respect for their plan. Heck, if anything I'm jealous that I hadn't thought about it first. While I'm not licensed to practice EMS in Nevada, I could easily cruise around the streets of Milwaukee, Madison, or Chicago in my ambulance providing the same services to the over-imbibed folks in those fair cities. If we could ask for cash up front, like I'm sure they are, we could probably pull in a few thousand a week doing this. For that kind of coin any city could afford to fund the pension plan and give the nice EMS folks a hefty raise.

What I'm saying is, come on cash-strapped municipalities, belly up to the bedside and get your medical directors to authorize this service. Your budget woes are a thing of the past!

I do have a few questions though:

  • Is this legal? The owner is an anesthesiologist, but there is no mention of who is actually providing the service.

 

  • I'm a Nationally Registered Paramedic… are you hiring? Please?

 

  • Are you selling franchises? Cuz I could use one here in Wisconsin and Illinois real bad. I'd start my own but I'd need a medical director who would be willing… and the ones around here are probably spoil sports

 

  • Although… I haven't yet asked them if they  are ok with this. They could be. Perhaps it's better that you just sell me a franchise real quick and real cheap-like and we can just keep the brand-name going strong.

In all seriousness. Think of what effect this could have on the already overused emergency healthcare system in the city. I mean, if even 10% of the people who are going to be seen by this bus would have otherwise ended up in the emergency rooms getting largely the same treatment, this company could sincerely ease some of the burden on the healthcare system. It's definitely a cheaper alternative. Even their $150 treatment is way cheaper than a trip to the ER. This bus could immediately benefit the entire system by giving patients an alternative to the traditional, significantly costlier, methods. It will save insurance companies and governmental healthcare payors thousands and free up the ERs from taking care of this patient demographic.

I really do think they're on to something. Wish I'd have thought of it first.The success of this business will go to prove something. If it survives and thrives, then EMS can also find free-market alternatives that will help save our profession and the communities we serve. Obviously it can be done.

In other news, kudos to the State of Maine, who authorized funding for Community Paramedicine. Bravo guys, way to intellegently look for real solutions to your healthcare budget woes. I tip my hat to you. – http://www.jems.com/article/news/new-community-paramedicine-law-maine-loo

Notice anything similar?

Coming Soon – The Law of Unintended Consequences meets the fire service

3 comments

Remember the post I put up a few days ago entitled “A Predatory Ambulance Fee”? It talked about how the Elgin, IL city council is planning to help recoup their costs for Fire and EMS services by charging for refusals.

(This is the link if you didn’t read it: “A Predatory Ambulance Fee”)

This just in:

Apparently they’re not done proposing new fees in the city. They seem to be very serious about recouping their costs and finding new ways to monetize their services. According to this article posted on Firefighter Nation, they’re planning on adding quite a few new fees to their repertoire.

Here’s the link: “Illinois Department Considers Charging Non-Residents for Fire Services” Read it and see what you think.

The article only mentions two specific fees, a $500 per hour fee for an engine response and $2200 for “a serious car accident where someone has to be transported by helicopter.” These fees are interesting enough, but the article also hints that there are further fees forthcoming.

The chief is quoted as saying that he expects most of these fees to be covered by insurance. After all, he says… that’s what insurance is for.

The chief may be very correct with that statement; insurance exists to pay for the unforeseen costs of bad things that happen to people who pay for it. Insurance companies pay these costs based upon rigid contracts they sign with their customers and charge their customers rates based upon the average risk they assume on behalf of the customer. They will only pay for what they are contractually obligated to pay for. While I have no knowledge of whether or not insurance will actually pay for the charges Elgin is proposing in practice, I’m assuming the city of Elgin doesn’t either and if they don’t seem to care whether the people they are saddling with these kinds of fees are insured for them or not, why should I?

It’s not like these insurance companies aggregate risk across all of their customers and will pass the overall cost of these fees to everyone in the area causing everyone’s insurance rates to go up, right?

Remember, I am not against fire departments, cities, and/or EMS services finding new and innovative revenue streams or ways to defray costs. The City of Elgin is not a villain here. It is very expensive to operate a service and I completely understand wanting to recoup some of those costs. These kinds of fees are somewhat the result of a rigid and over-regulated EMS payment system that chains our entire industry and squashes most hopes of innovation. I believe in EMS payment reform. In fact, I demand it.

But guys? While you’re by far not the only department in the US proposing and implementing things like this… you’re all opening Pandora’s Box. Your citizens are going to fight this, the press won’t be good, and you may end up creating more of a wave of dissatisfaction than you’re really prepared to endure. Think about Moline, IL and what they’re going through right now. Could you imagine their chances of winning their fight if they had implemented these fees?

Then again, perhaps they should implement them in Moline and let the revenue sources balance their budgets… In Moline they say they’re operating at over a $340,000 budget deficit and maybe these kinds of fees would offset that deficit enough that they could make their EMS financially viable.

Or maybe the marketplace will decide and departments that do this kind of thing will be put “out of business” (for lack of a better term) by competitive forces.

I would be willing to bet that there’s someone out there that would only charge $450 an hour for an engine response and only $2100 for a “serious car accident”. There are probably plenty of people and companies that would be happy to do fire response for profit. That’s what happens when governmental services start acting like monopolies in a capitalistic system, they get replaced by free market alternatives. Back in Ben Franklin’s day the fire service was a private endeavor that was only made public when the cost of providing protection wasn’t profitable enough to serve the ends the people wanted it to serve. Make the fire service profitable and private industry may find a way to make a solid business model out of it. Don’t believe me? Think Fed Ex and UPS versus the US Postal service.

I’m not saying it’s a good or bad thing. It’s why private industry exists. If there’s an opportunity to make money doing something, someone will step up to make money doing it. These fees, if they become lucrative, may just be the opportunity for private industry to find a business model that didn’t exist before.

I am able to understand why Elgin wants to implement these fees… but I think that this is a situation ripe for the Law of Unintended Consequences. If I could give cities proposing these kinds of fees some advice I would tell them they should find every single efficiency within their existing budgets before they set about increasing revenue through raising fees. Make no mistake, within the contemporary political climate; citizens are going to scrutinize every aspect of your budget when you start trying to get them in the wallet. You may not like what they find.

I don’t have the ultimate answer but I’m keeping an eye on this story. You should too.

Issues: I’m Scared of something, Have a Rhythm, and A New Column Up, Too.

2 comments

First off, my newest column is up over at JEMS.com – You might like it. I’m challenging the status quo. Like I do:

“EMS Provider Questions 3-Dose Nitro Rule – JEMS.com”

Did you read that and then come back? Good! But if not, I’ll link it again for you at the bottom. I’ve got a few other things that are on my mind today. Like this:

If you haven’t noticed yet, my posts are back in a rhythm.

I’m really enjoying all of the feedback and participation I’m getting on the blog since I’ve been hitting it regularly lately. I’m trying to do good, solid posts on Mondays and Wednesdays, with something on Friday to carry me through the weekend. On Tuesdays and Thursdays I plan on the occasional link love and mention of some of the other great bloggers out there. I hope y’all like the schedule and what I’ve been putting out lately.

But this week? The schedule is a tad off…

I wrote a detailed, strongly worded, journalistic, researched, and somewhat opinionated piece on a topic I care deeply about. It went long, so I broke it into two parts and planned to run it this week on Monday and Wednesday.

However, you’re probably noticing that you aren’t reading that post right now. That’s because the post scares me.

I am playing with fire with this post. Literally. It involves a burning issue that’s impacting a fire department that I am very familiar with. They, in turn, are very familiar with me. Their city council just voted to end their ambulance service in a move that they deemed purely financial. In the piece, I gave them strong advice and tough love after thoroughly exploring the issue as best as I was able.

But I’m scared to put it up here, honestly.

Any Fire-Based EMS vs. The World issue is a hot issue, fraught with peril for anyone who should so dare offer an opinion that isn’t “FIRE RULES!!! WHAT ARE THOSE IDIOTS WHO DON’T LIKE FIRE DOING!?!?!?!” I didn’t offer that opinion. While I support those firefighters and my good, long-time friends among them, I simply can’t blindly repeat that dogma. This issue is much, much more complex than that and unfortunately for my friends, that dogma isn’t going to work here. It has already failed and it will continue to fail if they continue to use it. The landscape has changed. Down is now up. Dogs and Cats are living together… Mass Hysteria! is happening and they need some new strategies.

Our friend Chief Reason wrote on the topic on his blog over at Fire Engineering and you can read his opinion on the issue I’m talking about here: “City Fires; Chief ‘retires’.  (Oh, and Art? We miss you over here at FEblogs)

Chief Reason does a good job of explaining the issue. I respect that man’s opinion a great deal and always have… and I’m not saying he’s wrong at all. I’m just saying that the argument he’s using to defend the position he’s defending is well… dated. The reality has changed as I have said and that kind of argument just isn’t going to work anymore.

Read Art’s post on the subject for more. I’ve written on it but am holding the post for a while. If anyone from Moline cares to talk about my opinion, I’d be happy to speak on it. However, I didn’t just write it for Moline. There is a much, MUCH wider issue at hand.

Here’s the deal: This thing that happened in Moline? It’s coming to your town. It’s coming to where you live and if you defend yourselves the same way I see them defending themselves, you’re probably going to lose your fight. (Not that I want them to. I support quality EMS in the City of Moline. I have a lot of friends and family that live and work there and I want the EMS there to be the absolute best it can be)

I’m going to think about posting the piece. Till then, if you care to read it before I decide, e-mail me at ProEMS1@yahoo.com or hit me up on Facebook and I’ll send it to you.

Also as I mentioned up at the top, my newest monthly column is up over at JEMS.com – Pop by and have a read. I’m challenging beliefs there, too.

“EMS Provider Questions 3-Dose Nitro Rule – JEMS.com”

Change Medicare? Save EMS

9 comments

I’ve said this before, and I’ll continue to say it until I can do something about it: The Fee-For-Transport model has failed EMS. We have to change it and we have to change it soon.

In fact, I believe that the entire revenue model we use for our industry has failed. I think that the “Fee for Transport” model employed by the Emergency Medical Services industry is flawed, archaic, outdated, and is not conducive for the development of our profession. I think it stifles growth and development. I think that it is unfair to make this inequity up through local property taxes.

I think it has to change.

Don’t know what I’m talking about? Let’s hear what Medicare has to say on the subject:

“The Medicare ambulance benefit is a transportation benefit and without a transport there is no payable service. When multiple ground and/or air ambulance providers/suppliers respond, payment may be made only to the ambulance provider/supplier that actually furnishes the transport.” (https://www.cms.gov/manuals/Downloads/bp102c10.pdf)

Yes, that’s what that means: Medicare sees EMS solely as a “transport provider.”

Basically Medicare is saying that all they’re going to pay for is taxi service. Sure, they’ll reimburse some other expenses, but without the taxi component, they’re not picking up the tab. They’re certainly not going to pay for you to provide medical care for one of their clients on a scene. They’re not going to pay you for sweetening up an unresponsive diabetic and leaving them at their house, they’re not going to pay you for providing Community Paramedicine, and they’re certainly not going to pay you for other home health or primary care services. To them, we’re a medical transport industry. They pay for transportation and that’s it. Sure, they make a differentiation between “Emergency” transportation and “Non-Emergency Transportation” and use the term “skilled medical treatment” for some of the things done in the back of our rigs, but that whole “transportation” thing is always there. No transport, no payment. It’s as simple as that.

This very appropriate image was sent in to me by Matthew Rausenberg while I was writing this post. Thanks Matt!

Not sure about that? Well, here’s more reading on what Medicare WILL and WILL NOT pay for in this informative booklet that I just printed out for every EMT at my service to read:

That’s the link to the “Official Government Booklet” that explains:

  • “When Medicare Helps Cover Ambulance Services”
  • “What Medicare Pays”
  • “What You (the patient) Pay”
  • “What to do if Medicare Doesn’t Cover Your Ambulance Service”

I’ll admit, this is pretty light reading by government standards, but it’s important for all of us in the profession to read, understand, and know this stuff. Sure, I know that some of you out there are going to fall back on our old standby statement that “I’m not in this for the money, I just want to help people” or some other platitude just like that, and I understand and appreciate your altruistic motivations… but I will tell you that EMS needs money to operate. Whether you’re a volunteer or a full-time paid employee, your ambulance service needs money to function. Paid employees need to make a living, ambulances need fuel, stations need heat, equipment needs to be replaced, and communities need 24-hour ambulance coverage to meet both their emergency and non-emergency needs. Ambulance services are critical for any community, no matter their capacity, and all of that stuff takes money. Medicare, through the “Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Serivices” (CMS) sets the tone for the entire healthcare payment industry and by default they have become responsible for propping up a majority of ambulance services through providing the lion’s share of their total revenue in some areas. They’re the big dogs in the healthcare payment arena… and they’re holding us back.

Not that I’m solely picking on Medicare here… but let’s read further into their definitions, shall we? (From the second document I linked to above):

“Emergency ambulance transportation

Emergency ambulance transportation is provided after you’ve had a sudden medical emergency, when your health is in serious danger, and when every second counts to prevent your health from getting worse. The following are examples of when Medicare might cover emergency ambulance transportation:

  • You’re in severe pain, bleeding, in shock, or unconscious.
  • You need oxygen or other skilled medical treatment during transportation.
  • You need to be restrained to keep you from hurting yourself or others.

These are only examples. Medicare coverage depends on the seriousness of your medical condition and whether you could have been safely transported by other means.”

Clearly, Medicare thinks that only “Skilled Medical Care” provided whilst tires are rotating under a patient is valuable. They pay no attention to the fact that there are better and cheaper alternatives out there that our profession could offer them. I know that Medicare represents taxpayers and the payments they give out are tax dollars, and I appreciate and want them to be responsible with those tax dollars…

I just don’t think that they are.

Medicare has determined that the only way they can be responsible with our tax money is to deny as many payments as possible and to only pay for the bare minimum that they feel is important. That’s why ambulance services are “Transportation providers” in their eyes. However, this ignores so much potential in cost savings in my opinion. They pay no attention to the fact that while it’s nice that they pay for “Wait-and-return” ambulance transfers to and from nursing homes and clinics, those services could be provided in a lot of cases by paramedics who could take care of the patient’s needs on site and save them a ton of money by offering the new service. They ignore the fact that if they provided a $250-$300 benefit for an ambulance to come, fully assess, treat an unresponsive hypoglycemic diabetic, and then release them safely without transport, they could avoid the (estimated) $500 transport bill and subsequent $1000 ER bill. The savings are potentially enormous… and there are a ton of ideas like that waiting to be explored.

We, as a profession, just have to convince them that these ideas are worth being explored.

The healthcare payment system shapes healthcare.  It certainly has shaped the way we operate in EMS. The pressure to do only what we’re going to get paid to do is so prevalent a force in the industry that it is almost the very foundation of what we do and how we’ve evolved. The payment system didn’t evolve to meet our potential; EMS has evolved to fit its limiting influence. This is why we do the BLS transfers that cost too much for too little benefit. This is why new products that can’t be reimbursed aren’t making their way into the hands of field providers. This is why treatment modalities aren’t expanding as fast as in other areas of medicine. The CMS fee schedule dictates all of this.

And we as a profession have to change it.

Imagine what EMS would be today if we could bill for any service we thought provided benefit to our patients and our communities? To be sure, this would cause some “waste, fraud, and abuse” in the initial phases… but that exists in today’s system. Could you imagine if Community Paramedicine was fully reimbursed? Can you imagine that if instead of providing a wait-and-return BLS transport for a nursing home patient needing a surgical wound re-check, you came, assessed, took some pictures on a cell phone camera and sent it to the physician wirelessly? Can you imagine if you could charge for responding, assessing a patient with a minor medical complaint, and then having the patient transported to an urgent care center that would continue your care? Can you imagine how different everything we do could be?

Well, at least I can start to imagine. I see additional revenue streams that would come into our industry and improve the profession, strengthen our patient care, and save the healthcare system a boatload of money while improving access to primary healthcare. I see paramedics and EMTs not being taxi drivers. I see a real career and a bigger impact upon the overall health of our communities. I see more fiscal responsibility. I see lots of great potential.

And I don’t know how to do this yet, but maybe somewhere, someone reading this might have an idea.

Do you?

————————————————-

I’ve written on this before, and maybe you’d be interested in reading some of those ideas:

“What is the next ‘Low Hanging Fruit’ of EMS 2.0 and US Healthcare Reform?”

And to look at a real-life example of how our British brethren are handling this issue and are having success across the pond:

A Shoutout Across the pond to our British Brethren”

I don’t usually talk about Political things…

4 comments

But when I do, they’re usually of the macro-local type and  have something directly to do with EMS.

This is one of those things.

The village of Schaumburg bucked the national trend of raising taxes and fees to cover rising expenses when its board unanimously approved a 4.4 percent reduction to the 2010 property tax levy

You read that right: reduction.

But that’s not all.  Village officials also did away with vehicle sticker fees and moved to have property taxes cover garbage removal.  

Just for the record, Schaumburg is in Illinois, folks. The same state that sent our senator up to the White House last election cycle. Lowering taxes isn’t exactly the modus operandi for an Illinois municipality. In fact:

Schaumburg is an anomaly among Illinois municipalities. Others like Gurnee and Orland Park raising taxes and fees where ever they can. Northbrook, which has seen an increase in sales tax revenue stood pat.

Schaumburg is one of the larger municipalities in the sprawling conglomeration of suburbs surrounding Chicago. It faces the exact same economic challenges that other municipalities in the area face, but it seems to be doing much better, economy wise.

The measure, if you read the article, isn’t final, but it looks like it will pass. Schaumburg has a full-time Fire/EMS dept and pays their firefighters extremely well, they also seem to have great city services and every time I’ve been in the city I’ve liked what I’ve seen.

In fact, the recent NAEMSE conference was held in a hotel in Schaumburg, and they played a small part in paying the hotel tax.

As I’ve said before, I’m not one to wax too poltical on this blog. This is an EMS and Fire blog and you come here to read about things related to Fire and EMS. I understand that. I don’t want to hijack the discussion to the miasma that is our national political scene and end up alienating a different percentage of my readership every time I post something of an opinionated political nature. However, local politics affect EMS and Fire, and I speak on the politics of EMS quite a bit. This is one of those issues.

I have to ask the question here:

Businesses pay taxes, residents pay taxes, Visitors pay taxes… It goes to say that the more businesses, residents, and visitors a locality gets, the more taxes they’ll pay by sheer volume. People have a choice on where they locate their business, where they visit, and where they choose to live. If you were in the position to do any of these things, knowing that Schaumburg is lowering their taxes, and plans on removing their property tax entirely - just like they said they would – would you choose to do so in Schaumburg, or in the other towns mentioned in this article?

In additon, removing the stupid municipal car stickers, which are really just a massive inconvenience and hassle to the residents of a city, and covering garbage disposal fees through what’s left of the property tax?

Well, Schaumburg… you may just be an island of sanity in an insane state. May word get out and people flock to your borders. It’s called “competition” and usually only successful businesses are the groups that think of lowering their prices to become more attractive to the customer. Bravo.

Source: http://www.nbcchicago.com/news/local-beat/Schaumburg-Officials-May-Lower-Property-Taxes-103947993.html?dr#ixzz10vUpO9PP

Modern (f)Art

4 comments

Howdy Everyone!! It’s Ckemtp, your friendly neighborhood EMS and Fire blogger with a few things I’d like to bring to your attention. I’d like to talk to you today about politicians. Not the politicians that are doing such a great job at managing our collective money on the national level… I want to talk to you today about the local ones, the ones who do the important work of making sure our traffic lights aren’t burnt out, that our roads are pot-hole free, and that our sewer systems don’t back up and discharge raw sewage into lakes and rivers and stuff.

Specifically, I’d like to talk about Local Politicians and public art.

My favorite writer, the legendary Humorist Mr. Dave Barry, wrote a piece about public art a few years back that you just have to read before continuing on with this post. It’s actually one of many of his articles that include things about public art, which he defines as “Art that is purchased by experts who are not spending their own personal money” it also involves the phrase “a naked man the size of an oil derrick” and has references to nuclear weapons and alcohol. I love Dave Barry, I really do.

Read this: “Does Public Art Make Sense”Then come back once you stop ROFL’ing 

This is "Art" I think... Oh I know! It's a bus stop

Then, g’head and read THIS ARTICLE from Michigan Capitol Confidential which talks about the REALLY SMART city of Ann Arbor, Michigan… which is planning an $850,000 piece of public art. It’s really interesting to me that they’re planning this… and I really hope it isn’t made of flammable material because the city is “Facing a multimillion dollar budget deficit” and is planning on laying off firefighters to handle the budget crisis.

Here’s that article again: http://www.michigancapitolconfidential.com/13219

Yes, Ann Arbor, MI, the REALLY SMART city that it is, is laying off firefighters while spending $850,000 (That’s EIGHT HUNDRED FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS) on a “three piece public fountain”.

Oh, right… if it’s a fountain, it probably won’t burn down. That makes sense. Of course it might get filled with trash, since they’re laying off the city’s “Solid Waste Coordinator”. Y’know… the guy who oversees the trash pickup for the city. On the other hand though, they are hiring an “Art Coordinator” to, I don’t know… look at the art maybe? Maybe he’ll pick up the trash from the fountain.

Taxpayers, I’m talking to you here. Inefficiencies and, in this case, abject stupidity in local governments are killing us. If I was having trouble keeping up with the maintenance and mortgage in my own house, the first thing that I would do would not be to buy new paintings to hang on the walls. I certainly wouldn’t buy paintings at the expense of paying for trash pick-up, sewer service, or portable fire extinguishers. I think that I would pay for necessities first and niceties second. Responsible people take care of the whole Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs thing; Food, clothing, and Shelter first and buy pretty things after that. You do the things you HAVE to do well before the things you’d like to do.

At least responsible, SMART people do that… and apparently that’s not the kind of people that the voters in Ann Arbor, MI think would make good city council members.

Or do they?

Maybe they can call this "Art"

Rural EMS – A Fictional Letter to the Small Town Community

17 comments

Rural EMS has it’s challenges, not the least of which are the low pay and long hours. I believe that the lives of those in the sticks are just as important as the lives of those in the city and that rural folk need paramedics too. This is a fictional letter with a very real message. It could be written by a lot of paramedics and EMTs to a lot of people who live out in the sticks and I could have written this letter once when I left my small town EMS service to seek my EMS fame and fortune out there in the Big City. Now that I’ve come full circle and I’m once again working rural EMS I’m starting to wonder when I might have to write this letter again.

————————————————-

Mr. and Mrs. Penry

1212 Gravel Road

SmallTown, USA.

Dear Mr. and Mrs. Penry,

                My name is Chris and I am a paramedic working for your local EMS service. I live here on Mulberry St. in SmallTown and my parents and grandparents live out here as well. I’ve seen you on the street, at the local café, and pretty much anywhere in town for most of my life. I went to high school with your son, Johnny and thought about dating your daughter once but could never work up the courage to ask her out. I wanted to take her to the prom but I ended up taking Mary Buckrop instead. We sure got us in some trouble with the Sheriff when he caught us out by the lake, but he ended up letting us go. Thank goodness that he turned out to be so nice. He was one of the people that helped me through Paramedic school. He kept telling me that we needed good people for the ambulance out here in SmallTown and I’ve found out that he was right. We do.

                That’s why I’m having trouble writing this letter to you, Mr. and Mrs. Penry. I’ve taken it upon myself to write a personalized letter to everyone in the SmallTown EMS district because I’m facing a hard decision that I’d like you all to know about. I’ve been a paramedic now for the last ten years. I became an EMT and started volunteering with the SmallTown EMS District right out of high school and did that while I worked down at the Grain Elevator and put myself through college over in MidSizeTown. It was there that I decided that I wanted to be a paramedic and I completed my paramedic training at St. MidSize Hospital. I immediately fell in love with the work and I knew that it was something that I always wanted to be a part of. I continued volunteering with SmallTown EMS while I worked a full-time job for MidSizeTown Ambulance Service. I worked there for seven years and got a good bit of experience. I also worked part-time at St. MidSize’s Emergency Room. I still do.

                Three years ago when the voters approved SmallTown EMS District’s referendum to hire full-time paramedics, I jumped at the chance to come on board. This is my home. As cheesy as it may sound, I feel a connection with the people here in SmallTown and I feel that it’s my duty and my calling to protect them with my Paramedic skills. I’ve always studied and trained hard throughout my career to be the best paramedic I could be because I’ve felt it was my duty to be my best. I felt very good about coming on board with SmallTown EMS to protect my Neighbors, family, and Friends here in my hometown.

                Rural EMS is different than is EMS in the city. Sure, we may not be as busy out here in SmallTown as we could be if we were a bigger city, but that doesn’t make it easier on us. People out here don’t have access to primary care since Doc. Walters closed up his shop. While they can drive out to see the clinic in MidSizeTown, that’s thirty miles away. Most people don’t make the drive as often as they should and since people aren’t getting regular checkups and primary medical care they tend to let their minor and chronic conditions get so bad that when they finally call us, it’s because they don’t have anything else they can do. A lot of the time, their minor condition has become life threatening because it got out of hand. We can take them to St. MidSize ER, but they don’t have the capability to do things like perform cardiac catheterization surgeries to fix heart attacks, or to take care of trauma patients that need surgery right away, or to handle complicated patients in their inpatient wards. Their “ICU” is staffed by some dedicated people, but it only has two beds. This means that we have to bypass St. MidSize ER for the bigger hospitals in BigTown and that’s an hour away for us running Lights and Sirens. Because we have such long transport times and because our patients tend to be pretty sick when they call for us, we have to provide critical care level interventions. We carry more medications with us than do the big city ambulances and we can do more things than they can. That’s because ambulances in the city don’t have to be with their patients for as long as we do. They have a hospital within ten to fifteen minutes transport time of anywhere they may be. We have one within thirty minutes to an hour away. The fact that we’re so far away from hospital care forces us to be on our game all the time. We also have to be on call a lot to cover the duty ambulance when it’s away transporting a patient to the Big City. A normal call can take two hours. A critical call can take three or four. If we didn’t listen up, the calls that happen while the duty ambulance is away wouldn’t get a paramedic. I try not to let that happen.

                Here’s the deal, Mr. and Mrs. Penry, I’m not complaining about my job. I love it. I love the work and I really don’t mind all of the hours that I have to put in. While it’s hard on my family to have me gone so often, they have always understood. My wife Mary supports me in my desire to cover the town we grew up in. She has since Prom night. She’s been great. However, we’ve got our new little boy that just turned three this last month and he doesn’t understand why Daddy has to be gone so often. He also is starting to get very expensive, as kids do, and the meager salary I get working in town isn’t covering all of my bills. I took a pretty hard pay cut to come here. I wanted to and thought that I could keep my part-time job at St. MidSize to make ends meet. Unfortunately, since I’m always on call for SmallTown, I can’t hardly work any hours at St. Midsize. We don’t get paid to be on call, only for when we’re on duty and I’d say no to covering… but then someone in town might die because I’m not here to take the second call. I answer the second call all the time, like I did the night of Johnny’s car accident. I’ve heard he’s doing better but I can tell you that he probably wouldn’t be had I not decided to stay home and cover that night. Mary had plans to go to dinner in MidSizeTown but I just wanted to stick around for an hour to make sure the duty truck was back in town. I’m sure glad I did.

                I’m going to come right out and say it. There’s a job opening in BigCity EMS that would pay me twenty-thousand dollars a year more than I make here in SmallTown. I’d be able to work one job and wouldn’t have to put in so many hours away from my family. We wouldn’t have to skimp and save to pay the bills nearly as hard as we do now. I’d love to stay here and take care of my home town but the pay is just too low to survive on. A lot of good people have left since we went full time when they realized they couldn’t survive on the pay. I’ve been doing my best to train the kids that they hired to replace them, but they only seem to be coming here to use it as a stepping stone to a better job in the big city. I think that our town deserves better but I can see why the people would leave. I didn’t become a paramedic to get rich but I don’t think that I deserve to live in poverty because I choose to help my home town. People out here need experienced paramedics just as much as the people do in the big city. The lives of the people in the city aren’t any more important than the lives of the people out here. I feel strongly about rural EMS and I feel strongly about my home town… I just can’t make it anymore. The bank might come take the house and my family doesn’t deserve to suffer because I choose to help those that can’t pay me back.

                So, Mr. and Mrs. Penry, I’m asking you what you think I should do. One day the unthinkable is going to happen to someone and I want to make sure that there are good people to take care of them when it does, but I can’t have my family suffer financially anymore. My kid needs his daddy and my wife needs her husband. The bank needs the mortgage and my student loans need paying off. It’s a tough decision I’m facing and I’m asking the community what they think I should do.

                If you need me, just call 911. I’ll come like I always do. If I’m not on the duty truck you can just stop by the house. You know how to get ahold of me. Say Hi to Johnny for me.

Sincerely,

Chris NREMT-P

Questions About EMS on a sleepy morning – Care to answer?

9 comments

It is a very sleepy morning for me today. Yesterday was a hard-fought day on the ambulance by our standards. For the first part of the day I couldn’t run a call without somebody getting angry at me. It really didn’t bother me all that much, but you know how it goes. I actually got about 6 hours of sleep during the night though, so I got that going for me. Perhaps it’s the morning fog mixed with the lack of coffee available in the station this morning that’s causing my AM neural firings to generate random questions… perhaps I’m just nuts. However, if y’all would like to think about some things (and perhaps answer in the comments section, please) I invite you to join in on my personal morning groggies.

Here goes:

  • If Medicare would assign a payment that you could access for treating and releasing patients, thereby diverting them from the Emergent healthcare system and redirecting them to the more cost effective healthcare system, how would that change the industry?

 

  • If your service could choose to accept a lower payment from Medicare and Medicaid for every transport without regard to the nuances of medical necessity and never have to be denied reimbursement in exchange for a lower payment for every call, would your service take it? How would that change the industry?

 

  • How would you improve your service if all of a sudden a big, national competitor moved into your service area and started taking your share of the market… you’re losing calls to them and it’s affecting your bottom line… What do you do to improve your service to keep yourself in business?

 

  • How would you change your care if your medical director was watching over your shoulder on every call? What would change if it were your mother watching you?

I think that these questions aren’t the biggest questions facing the industry today, but I’ll bet ya’ that if they were considered by peons like us and also by the powers that our landscape would change quite a bit, wouldn’t it?

See you in the comment’s section.

EMS Pay Sucks!! (Part 4) – We Control the Market

7 comments

I read a short article in Entrepreneur Magazine (to which I subscribe) that had a story about a sign hanging in a shop somewhere that said this:

“Low Price. High Quality. Good Service.  – Pick two”

The saying goes that consumers can pick two of the above things that they feel are most important to them in their buying decisions. It also implies that businesses can focus and compete on two of the three, but they can’t do them all.

I agree with the sign. It shows in the fact that there are multiple outlets in the marketplace to purchase similar goods and services. If you’re price sensitive and don’t want the highest quality of furniture you buy from Ikea and assemble your purchase yourself. If you’re always after the best quality you go to a custom furniture builder who would be more than happy to deliver and install for the price you’re paying him. As always, if you as a consumer do not like what the merchant has for sale you “vote with your feet” and go somewhere else to spend your hard-earned money.

And that is how “the market” works. Businesses compete with one another for your patronage and this competition keeps their prices as low as the consumers are willing to pay for the level of quality they are willing to accept. People are willing to accept lesser quality products for lower cost as much as they are willing to pay more for better quality. Service and support plays a role in there too as nobody wants to get burned on a deal, product, or service. If your widget store has exactly the same quality of widgets for sale with the same service as the widget store across the street, people are going to buy the widgets at the lowest cost. Change any of the price/quality/service variables and the sales will follow where the consumer sees the best value. Of course I’ve oversimplified this a bit as the system we call “the free market” is infinitely nuanced in its simplicity, but this is indeed an EMS article. So don’t even get me started on that Adam Smith guy and his sleight of hand.

So why am I bringing forth this short little explanation of the free market? It’s because the ambulance industry is a service provider. Unfortunately (or fortunately if you prefer) we’re not entirely bent upon the whims of the marketplace due to the governmental regulations that set our price, control our service types, and dictate how we run our businesses. You probably know that Ambulance Services are “service providers” as they provide a service to our patients in exchange for fees paid for that service (ha!) and their tax revenues, but did you know that the Paramedics and EMTs are collectively a “service provider” for the ambulance industry itself?

Follow me here for a bit. If you separate out the collective “ambulance industry” from the collective EMTs and Paramedics making up the Profession of Paramedicine, you can see that there are two separate groups functioning in tandem. While we’ve always been inseparable and have been defined as one collective group, I suggest that we are really two entities. The Profession (Defined here as the Paramedics and EMTs together) and the ambulance industry (defined as the places we most usually work).The ambulance industry needs a service from the Profession in the form of us providing them with bodies to run their trucks, and we need them to employ us. If you were to take this thought further, we as members of the Profession compete with one another to provide our services to the various ambulance companies in the form of applying to and accepting positions with them under whatever conditions they set for us. They set the pay rates, benefits, shift schedules, etc and we paramedics compete with each other for the positions… usually accepting less compensation than we wished to receive as a condition of being employed.

Historically, our profession has competed on price as evidenced by the fact that our pay rates are much lower than we want to accept for our services. According to the above analogy, as we push our price lower either the quality of our education and skills or our level of service is going to suffer for it. One needs to look no further than their own paycheck to see that the pay is terrible. One also needs to look no further than their local “Medic Mill” school that exists solely to pump out EMTs and Paramedics with “a pulse and an EMT card” at the lowest possible cost with the absolute minimum level of education. We’ve become the Wal-Mart of ambulance staff, always rolling back our prices and lowering quality to encourage more and more demand.

If I have any liberty to speak to our profession I ask that today we all make the collective decision to compete on “High Quality” and “Good Service”, leaving “Low Price” behind. Frankly it hasn’t worked for our profession to provide our services for the low bid price. The subsequent drop in the quality of our education and services isn’t the best for our patients. We’ll always compete amongst each other to provide our services to the ambulance industry (I.E. apply for jobs) but if we all accept that we’re no longer competing on “Low Price”, we’ll all reap the benefits. Our patients will as well.

I suggest that we begin to “vote with our feet” more often in our quest for employment. If there are multiple ambulance services in your town, pick the one that offers the best pay and benefits and apply there for your employment. If and when you get hired, work like heck to make them the dominant ambulance company in the marketplace. Once the other competitors realize that the ambulance service with the best pay and benefits is gaining a competitive advantage, they’ll change… or be forced out of business. What you’ll begin to see is that the ambulance service that pays the best will begin to be able to “get what they pay for” from the profession in the fact that they will only hire the best qualified among us. Therefore we’ll begin to have to compete on quality and service to get hired for the best pay. We’ll no longer be competing on price alone. You’ll have to put more effort into the profession, but you’ll reap the rewards in terms of higher pay and benefits.

In addition, we need more Medicpreneurs. I’ve said before that the only way to make a lot of money in this game is to be the owner of a service. What’s to say that you can’t start your own ambulance company to put your boss out of business? Hire the best of your coworkers and pay them what they deserve. Do your best and work very hard every day. Soon enough, you’ll win if you can beat the market. You’ll be helping your profession and yourself as well.

When we begin to see the collective power that we wield as a profession in the marketplace we can begin to change the marketplace to fit our wishes. If we want EMS 2.0 to go ahead and get here already we’ve got to collectively become aware of our power and our duty to control the playing field. We haven’t won yet, let’s change the rules so we do. We owe it to our families, our patients, and everyone who depends on us. Wake Up EMS. We control the game here folks… We just have to realize the power we have together.

Low Price. High Quality. Good Service – Which two do you pick?

Fiddling While Rome Burns – The “Ambulance Industry”

14 comments

Allow me if you will to allude to some Roman history here. I know that it’s a little heavy for an EMS blog but if you would please search the dusty recesses of your memories to think of the Roman Emperor Nero, it would help this post. You know, the one who “fiddled while Rome burned”

I am way oversimplifying this, but the way that I remember the story was that Rome was being swept by the “Great Fire of Rome” that burned for days and decimated the city. Popular legend has it that Nero, unconcerned with the plight of his citizenry, played the fiddle while the city was burning.

 (Although, the MOST TRUSTWORTHY SITE ON THE INTERNET *Other than Mine* has this on the subject: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Fire_of_Rome)

Recent events and some things that I’ve been reading lately have brought some EMS issues to light in my mind, and thoughts about good ol’ Nero have popped into my head.

Are we Fiddling while Rome Burns?

There’s a few competing EMS system design models out there that have various people in their camps. Mention the virtues of one over another and you will get passionate and snarky responses from the various members of these camps. Trash Fire Based EMS and you’ll get a ton of people that will take a break from lifting weights and will bombard you with reasons while Fire Based EMS is awesome while wearing their T-Shirts emblazoned with “FIRE RULES!!”. Mention that 3rd service and not-for-profit EMS may have their downfalls and the EMS Chess Club will bring forth obscure research that shows how much better they are for the patients than everyone else is. Trash Private-for-profit EMS and um, the employees thereof will trash it right along with you and their management will be too busy putting out fires to care.

Try as you might to convince me that one is better than the other and I’ll agree with you on some points and disagree with you on others. I will only endorse what I call “EMS based EMS”, which is EMS provided by truly dedicated caregivers who base their decisions and actions simply upon what is best for their patients and their communities. I have my beef with fire based services that place protecting firefighter jobs and the “fun” stuff involving spraying water on things that happen to be on fire over solid patient care. I have my beef with private-for-profit services that always default to the bottom line, and admittedly, I have a bias towards third service and not-for-profit EMS agencies. However, no one system has ever proven to be a good fit for every community, none are inherently evil, and other professions find their fit within lots of configurations.

If the system design models out there are really locked into a competition for the soul of EMS then they’ve all got a lot of work to do. In this piece, I’m going to ignore patient outcomes, efficient use of tax money, and all of the stuff that I usually talk about… and focus on one thing and one thing only.

The way EMS people are treated by the competing systems will probably decide this debate we’ve got going on here. The model that treats the paramedics the best will win and will take over the industry. Why wouldn’t it? What paramedic with half of a brain would continue to work in a service model that didn’t pay and treat them the best?

Here in Northern Illinois, there are very few options for a paramedic that doesn’t want to do Fire Based EMS for one reason or another. The few options that there are don’t pay nearly as well as the fire-based groups and this creates an endless revolving door of young paramedics entering the system, working the “privates” for a while, while trying to get a “real job” with a fire department. The private services suffer for it, and the fire based services reap the benefits while fostering a system that (gulp, here it comes) focuses less on the healthcare and more on the fun stuff.

So I challenge the private, third-service, and not-for-profit services out there with my next statement.

You’re fiddling while Rome burns.

If you aren’t out there doing your absolute damndest to treat your employees well and pay them what they deserve, you’re failing. You push your employees away. You push the best and brightest into other professions and into fire-based EMS which hands down has the best pay and benefit structure. Your lack of interest in caring for your caregivers is killing our profession. You fiddle whilst complaining about decreased reimbursements and failing to do anything about it. You fiddle whilst focusing on minutia like stupid rules and regulations that degrade the dignity of the adults who work for you. You fiddle while worrying about protecting your jurisdictional boundaries and contracts while they’re eroded away by the constant stream of departing employees.

Nero could have been an ambulance manager in some of the services I’ve been to, worked for, and observed from the outside. Could he be you?

You have got to find a way to pay your people better. I don’t know exactly how it’s going to happen either, but it has to be priority #1 for every ambulance manager out there. Trust me, if you don’t do it you will find that your capital city has burned to the ground. You will lose your empire and it will not come back. If you aren’t out there doing every possible thing you can to keep your employees as happy as you can get them, you’re fiddling, and you’re failing our profession.

This blog has a lot of content on it that explores new revenue sources for ambulance organizations already. Coming soon: Ways for each individual EMS professional to take control of our own income potential, own our profession, and improve our care to our patients. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again folks, hang on cuz it’s going to get fun.

EMS Pay Sucks!! (part 3) – Who or What is at fault here!?

21 comments

Welcome back to the “Life Under the Lights Bar and Grille”, your local dive bar filled with lousy food, tepid beer, bad ambiance, and great friends. Like any local Midwestern dive bar, it’s a come-as-you-are-and-sit-on-down-and-hang-with-your-buds kinda place. A conversation has broken out on the topic of “EMS Pay Sucks!! Let’s DO something about it!!” and me, your local blogger has decided to write a series of posts explaining the issues as I see them.

So, if you haven’t been here to read the last two, I suggest you go back and read them before you read this. If you don’t, well then that’s your choice. It’s a pretty informal place we have here.

Part 1: “EMS Pay Sucks!! Let’s DO something about it!!”

Part 2: “EMS Pay Sucks!! (Part 2) – Identifying the Problem

————————————————

In the last two parts here at the Life Under the Lights Bar and Grille, we’ve established that the time for talking about the issues is over, and that all EMS people need to band together in an effort to affect the pay rates in our profession. We’ve also established that this is a very complex issue and it can pretty much be said that if this was going to be easy, that it would have been done already. 

If you’ve read the comments that I’ve gotten on the other posts in this series, this is a hot issue with vastly different valid arguments that have been brought forth by people I respect. While I agree with a lot of what has been said, I would like to boil the issue down a bit further than it has been brought in the comments section and in the information that I have previously been exposed to. Basically it’s like this: By examining other occupations that are well compensated for their skills, we can examine the position we find ourselves in with our profession.

I think that it works like this, Well Compensated Occupations have these things in common:

  1. There is a medium-to-high barrier to entry – Whether by education requirements, location, or the unpleasant nature of the work, there is a barrier to entering the occupation that requires work and/or an affinity for the location or work involved to get into the field. Not everyone can do it, the people that do it but cannot do it well easily fail out, and the people that can hang around to do the work are rewarded for it. Look at Dental Hygienists, teachers, and IT professionals.
  2. There has to be a perceived value in compensating the people in the field at a higher rate to achieve higher performance – Look at the salaries of professional athletes and CEOs. They create value intensively based upon their knowledge and talents and the better they are at doing what they do, the more value they create for their employers. Think of it, if you could raise profits in your company $5million per year, wouldn’t that be worth an extra $1million per year in payroll?
  3. The Industry they work in turns significant revenue overall – You could be the most talented Ice Sculptor in the world, but if you couldn’t find a market to sell your ice sculptures to before they melted, you wouldn’t make any money at it. Nor would you if you were the executive chef at a greasy spoon. Sure, you’d have the same job title, “Sculptor” or “Executive Chef”, as a sculptor that worked with Marble and Gold, or an executive chef that worked at a very fancy restaurant in downtown New York… but since the places you worked for weren’t making any money, you couldn’t possibly be paid very much; Even if you were as highly educated and more talented than your counterparts at the fancy joints.

I think that overall, point number three above sets the tone for us. Our industry doesn’t make much money, therefore, no matter how caring, compassionate, qualified, or talented we are, we won’t be making much for working in it. It’s pretty much that simple. Sure, some salaries are artificially inflated due to varying degrees support from governmentally levied taxes, subscriptions, or corporate support but if we were to stand solely on our current business model, the “fee for service” model where we only get paid if we transport and most of our customers do not pay then we’d all be much poorer than we are now. In fact, most ambulance services would be out of business.

I’ve heard the argument that one form of EMS delivery or another is “Ruining it for the rest of us” with people in one camp bemoaning “the privates” for being all about profit and not paying their employees due to the money grubbing nature of their owners, and people in another camp bemoaning “The Fire Guys” for holding the profession back and keeping educational standards low so that their fire guys don’t have to get the advanced education that would be required of other well-compensated healthcare professions. People in almost every camp bemoan the volunteers saying “If they do it for free, how can we expect people to pay for us!?”

Well, while all of those arguments sound plausible enough and may hold some truth to them, they’re crap when you really look at them. Should all restaurants be Governmentally based like the Fire Departments because then pay would be equal across the board? Right now people that work in Government cafeterias earn better money than those working in Flo and Gino’s Diner down on 5th St. Flo and Gino’s Diner is *ruining* the restaurant business, right? How about IT professionals? People that work doing advanced networking at IBM earn WAY more than the people that do networking at your local newspaper office. Does that mean that smaller operations, and not large companies are *ruining* the IT business? Waitresses that work in Casinos and at Hooters make way more than do waitresses that work at your local fancy chain restaurant… Is TGI Friday’s to blame?

Every business, governmental organization, or organization on Earth in one way or another, is a system that takes in money and other resources, does something to it, and then spits out something with perceived value to it. The military takes in vast amounts of money, manpower, and other resources and doesn’t make a dime doing it. Its value is in protecting the interests of the society that funds it and therefore it’s usually a governmental pursuit. Diamond mining takes a lot of resources and money to perform as well, but since diamonds are sold for huge profits, it’s a pursuit of the private sector. I don’t get much into politics on my blog, but I can say that personal experience has taught me that capitalism works and that government rarely does anything better, more efficiently, or faster than does the private sector. Government bodies, by definition, rarely are any good at staying within budget, let alone making a profit, and when they do try to make a profit, they fail spectacularly… e.g. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. By definition, the Fire Service doesn’t make a profit, and they have branched out into providing EMS in a lot of cases, solely to get a piece of the transport revenue to support their other operations. Private services, by definition, are doing the same… Neither one is inherently evil.

And neither are volunteers. I work in rural areas and I’ve always lived in them. Heck, my hometown had more cows than people and yet I still needed someone to bring the ambulance whenever the farm hand got trampled on by Bessy. Rural areas have voluntary agencies where community members step up to the plate to provide services out of the humanity they have to their neighbors and also because of the fact that if they didn’t do it, nobody would. That’s not evil, it’s just a reality of rural life. (There are benefits to the volunteer services that I will expound upon in a later article not in this series as well.) (Disclosure, I’m a volunteer paramedic and dang proud of it).

A paramedic blogger who I really respect, TOTWTYTR (Who writes the blog “Too Old to Work, Too Young to Retire”) offered the following comment on my post “Paramedics Providing Physicals? Decreasing Healthcare Costs and Improving Patient Care – EMS 2.0”

“Chris, you seem to be intent on finding more for paramedics to do. I’m not sure why, when there is a “shortage” of paramedics we need a heavier work load or “expanded scope”. We’re also likely intruding into someone else’s work space in the process.

Nor can I say that giving more for the same amount of money of benefit to the profession. In fact, I’d opine that it will have the opposite effect.”

His argument looks good too, when you don’t share the same definition of a business as I do and you don’t view EMS as a business, which it is. Remember my third point above, the one about industries that don’t make any revenue being unable to compensate their employees at a reasonable rate. My idea in the above post, to have a paramedic provide your next annual physical, is another service that we can use to sell for a profit. The belief that we can survive solely on transport revenue has not panned out when most of our transport revenue is based upon dwindling government reimbursement through Medicare and Medicaid (and the looming universalization of healthcare) and the tax revenues we rely on from local governments is starting to be eaten away. We have to find new sources to generate revenue from. We’ve got to compete in the marketplace to either do old things better and/or cheaper or do new things before anyone else does them. Our profession is not insulated from capitalism just because we layer ourselves in compassion.

So to end this long rant, I think that we can go a long way towards solving our pay problem by turning our attention to the three points above.

First, educational standards must be universally standardized, universally raised, and must be owned by our professional governing body. While we should probably never make a Master’s degree the entry point to ambulance work, it shouldn’t be a GED either. Probably some PE classes should be in there as well, or at least the ability to pass them. Go Get Educated!

Second, we have to educate the public about what it is that we do and why being good at it is important. If the public thinks that a volunteer service with a BLS response is adequate, then they’ve never laid there with a broken femur only to be bounced down a gravel road next to an EMT-Basic that can’t give them a squirt of Morphine. They’ve also never had their MI go into cardiogenic shock because the BLS volunteers couldn’t give them correct medications to mitigate the damage. They have to be shown convincing evidence of these facts before they will, and someone has to be our cheerleaders. Honestly, I’ve never seen an “EMS Cheerleader” or someone who was promoting the profession to the public, that hasn’t been skewered by their peers. Maybe NBC’s “Trauma” wasn’t the most accurate show in the world… but neither was “Top Gun” and we loved that movie and wanted to be a fighter pilot after seeing it (last week, again). Be an EMS Cheerleader in your community!

Third, your EMS service needs to go do something to make itself money. Figure out what you can do to boost revenue, and do it. Try new things. There are a lot of business ventures that have a good synergy with EMS.. Perhaps you could sell those little “I’ve fallen and I can’t get up” buttons and home-safety devices to the elderly in your community. Perhaps you could do home healthcare. Perhaps you could offer OSHA safety consulting to business and industry in your jurisdiction. All of these things are very much part of what we can, and probably will be doing in the future. Seek out New Ideas and Profitable Ventures!

I haven’t figured out the title to the next post in this series, but I’ll be writing it tomorrow. I’ve loved the debates that have been popping up in the comment’s section and I’m sorry that I haven’t jumped in there much as of yet. I’m just trying to keep my ideas to the main posts, and then I’ll come back and debate when I get out what I want to say. You all have been creating some great energy and while we’re not going to agree on this, I’ll say it again “Perfection is the Enemy of the Good Enough”. Complete agreement is not necessary for us to act upon a consensus.

EMS Pay Sucks!! Part 2 – Identifying the problem

33 comments

Welcome back to the “Life Under the Lights Bar and Grille”, your local dive bar filled with lousy food, tepid beer, bad ambiance, and great friends. Like any local Midwestern dive bar, it’s a come-as-you-are-and-sit-on-down-and-hang-with-your-buds kinda place. A conversation has broken out on the topic of “EMS Pay Sucks!! Let’s DO something about it!!” and me, your local blogger has decided to write a series of posts explaining the issues as I see them.

 So, if you haven’t been here to read the last two, I suggest you go back and read them before you read this. If you don’t, well then that’s your choice. It’s a pretty informal place we have here.

 Part 1: “EMS Pay Sucks!! Let’s DO something about it!!”

Part 2: “EMS Pay Sucks!! (Part 2) – Identifying the Problem (you’re here)

Part 3: “EMS Pay Sucks!! (Part 3) – Who or what is at fault here?

———————

The way our country compensates its EMS personnel is an abomination. It’s almost criminal, it’s inhumane, and it’s just plain wrong. Paramedics and EMTs do not deserve to live at, near, or below the poverty line simply because they chose to make a career out of helping others. We do not deserve the shame of being struggling from paycheck to paycheck. We do not deserve the hardships of trying to raise a family and continuously have to explain to them just why it is we have to work so many hours and have such little in our paychecks to show for it.

I know that EMS compensation is frankly despicable… but you don’t have to take my word for it. There is a lot written on the subject that comes from some very credible sources. Some examples:

Favorite Quote (but the read the link to get even angrier):

“Paramedics

What they do: Paramedics respond to emergency situations and attempt to provide the necessary medical care, whether it involves transporting participants to a hospital or treating them on the scene.

Surprising salary: $27,070. Seeing as paramedics have high stress jobs that require them to be on call and ready to save lives at a moment’s notice, you might expect their mean annual salary to be higher.”

”Other workers in occupations that require quick and level-headed reactions to life-or-death situations are:

All those links work, by the way. Here’s a little pre-test question for you: Of those “occupations” listed above, which one is markedly the lowest paid??

I’ve been in full-time EMS for over ten years and currently work two-full time paramedic jobs. Not only do I feel the low wages, awful benefits, and long hours personally, but I also see what my coworkers go through with their lives and their families. What does one do when their calling is something so vital to the community, yet is so unappreciated financially that it hurts their families and their future?

In my travels throughout the nation I have had the chance to seek out and speak with EMS people in a lot of localities. I tend to visit odd places and I make it a point to seek out and get into conversations with interesting strangers. Luckily, all of the EMS people I know seem to fit the description of being “interesting”. I’ve heard them speak of the same problems that I’ve experienced. I’ve seen the pain and embarrassment in their eyes as they describe their love for the job and try to downplay the fact that they’re struggling financially. I’ve heard the same stories almost every time I’ve spoken with them. When they were young and new to the profession the long hours and low wages didn’t matter all that much to them… However, once they spend about five to ten years working the box they tend to experience the same struggles that I have. Spouses and Children don’t like it when the EMS person continues to work 100 hours a week to earn a paycheck that only comes close to covering the bills. They don’t like not having any disposable income. They don’t like the 24/7 demands of the job too much either. These facts rear their ugly heads when the EMS provider reaches a certain point in their life, and a career in EMS gets harder and harder to justify. Ever wonder why you don’t see many EMS professionals that have been continuously working full-time EMS for more than ten or so years? It’s for this reason. Sure there are a lot of exceptions, but I would think that the statistical clustering would bear this out. Eighteen-to-twenty year olds enter the profession, become family people around five-to-ten years later, and realize that the hours and the money they get for those hours are killing their family life… then they get other jobs, or stay in EMS and become very bitter about it.

So if I were to be asked to identify the problem using words that everyone could understand, I’d say this:

“The public is counting on the people in Emergency Medical Services to protect the lives of themselves and their loved ones. They then turn around and compensate them for this task at about the level they compensate fry cooks. They demand that there is a paramedic or EMT immediately available to them at all times to help them when the unthinkable happens, but they aren’t willing to pay them more than they do their bartender or waitress. People need advanced care immediately available to them in order to maintain the quality and presence of their lives after an emergency, and they need highly trained, experienced, and dedicated people to provide that care, but all that care seems to be worth to them is poverty-level income. What is wrong with our priorities?”

What is wrong with our priorities indeed.

I think that the above information is enough to identify that I think there is indeed a problem here. It’s an almost overwhelmingly complex problem as well. However, if it were an easy problem to fix, it would have been fixed by now. Fixing this has become mandatory for me, as it is mandatory for all of you. I’m writing this to contribute to the solutions that we’ll have to put into place, and by participating in this, you’ll be too. Over the next few days, I’ll be posting parts in this series, because I don’t think that one post will provide as many angles as I feel I need to.

One thing I do know, we’re going to act on what I put out here and on what you add to the discussion in the comments section and in your daily lives. We can no longer hope someone else will act. I ask every person who reads this to participate for our own well-being and the improvement of our profession. We’re not going to agree on everything, but “perfection is the enemy of the Good Enough”. Complete consensus is not necessary, action for our collective professional well-being is.

Coming tomorrow: EMS Pay Sucks!! Part 3 – Who or what is at fault here?

EMS Pay Sucks! Let’s do something about it

30 comments

We’re gonna have ourselves a little Audience Participation Exercise.

This whole blogging thing is a pretty intimate relationship, isn’t it? I mean, you all have your favorite bloggers that you regularly read and I’d be quite honored if you’d count me among them. I write straight from the front of my ambulance and I’ve been repaid by all of you for it by your sheer act of coming to read what I have to say. I rarely hold anything back from your eyes, and this is no exception to that rule.

So please, dear reader, humor me for a bit here while I pull you in to a pretend scenario. I’m a rural Midwestern guy and like any of my peers I like my dive bars. Of course, I’m a family man and I try to be a good one so I don’t frequent them very often anymore, but the one thing that I’ve always liked about them is the conversation that develops centered around the non-formal atmosphere that they hold. It’s pretty intense most times, usually brutally honest, and always entertaining as all get out. Everybody’s equal with a can o’ PBR in their hand. (or, diet pepsi for the young folk as we’re a family establishment) (no swearing either) (well, not much).

So let me invite you to the “Life Under the Lights Bar and Grille”. Coming soon to this little blog of mine is the beginning of my crusade to kick the current EMS pay rates and system thereof squarely in the behind. I’m frankly, mad as heck and I’m not going to take it anymore… well, at least as blogging is concerned as I still have to make a living, you know. Don’t get dressed up, come as you are, and let’s have a spirited conversation about why EMS people make such crappy money for doing what we do. I’ve got enough ideas on this topic to carry me through a few evenings of my wooden “free drink” nickels and I’d love to share some brutally honest conversation with the EMS folks in my audience that I think can make a difference in the quality of life for those who save lives. We need to, we have to, and we deserve to.

On duty personnel will be limited to a three-drink-maximum, as long as it’s coffee or a soft drink of their choice. We are consummate professionals, you know.

Starting tomorrow I’m going to be writing a few good rants on this topic. I’m holding back tonight because well, coffee lends itself to more coherent writing than does late night camaraderie enhancement beverages. However, if you all would do me the honor of getting started by reading the following posts of mine:

Read this too if you want to get mad:

http://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes292041.htm – The US Bureau of Labor Statistics Paramedic Salary page

————————

I’m turning this into a 5 or 6 part series, so here they are:

EMS Pay Sucks!! (part 2): Identifying the Problem

EMS Pay Sucks!! (part 3): Who or What is at Fault here?

Request for ideas on a problem – Can we be paid enough already?

5 comments

Howdy! This post is random, disjointed neural firings. It comes from me trying to reconcile the fact that I really, truly do love working EMS but also hate the fact that I get paid worse than a fry-cook. It’s not the easiest read, and I’m sorry about that, but I can’t think of any good ideas.

So really, I’m just complaining about being paid so poorly. Sorry.

Can you help? At the end I’ve put some ideas. Care to expand upon them in the comments section?

A comment I received on my last post got me thinking on this beautiful Sunday. Here it is:

Loved the quiz.  It would not only appear that I have another decade left to supplement the two already under my belt, but will most likely be found pulseless and apneic while seated in the rig one day….  I can’t think of anything I would rather do for a living!”

(Thanks to JimHaden for the comment)

On that post “Will Your Career Survive a Decade or More in Full-Time EMS? Take this 3 question quiz!” I got a lot of cool comments from long-time EMSers stating how they “beat the odds” and have survived upwards of a decade or two in this business. Then, the above comment kinda tied it together for me.

And on a warm, Indian Summer day here on duty, I gotta admit that I’m getting the warm fuzzies from my career choice. I’ve always said that I have an abusive, co-dependent relationship with paramedicine and EMS. I may need it more than it needs me, but…

Dang I wish I got paid more.

I love this job. I like the quirky personalities of the people I’ve met that do this. I like the camaraderie I’ve got with them. I like the pressure to perform in challenging conditions. I like having to think on my feet. I like meeting new people. I like making people feel better. Heck, I even like driving fast and breaking things.

I could go on.

Sure, there’s a ton of things about this job that I could do without. I’d like to be able to schedule calls to handle them when I’m ready. I’d like to be able to have the 911 dispatchers instruct certain patients to “Take a shower and then call 911 back when you’re done.” I’d also like magnetically levitating stretchers that can pick patients up with cranes.

I can go on there, too.

How are we going to make this into a profession that pays, heck… If not a “good” wage, at least a “fair” wage?

It’s not fair what we make. It just isn’t. Sure, I’m a rural paramedic but I feel strongly about rural paramedicine and the fact that the lives of people who don’t live in urban areas are just as important as the lives of those who do. The fact is though, that rural paramedics make much less than their urban counterparts. Yes, I know that it’s because of call volumes, but also because the competition with the overall amount of jobs available in urban areas as opposed to rural ones. It’s also due to tax base and service delivery model issues as well as overall economic conditions and demographics of the areas we cover.

I could go on, but you get that it’s a complex issue.

Today I had someone complain to me about their recent ambulance bill that they received for a long-distance transport. They felt that it was unfair to be billed so much for something they felt they could do with a taxi cab. I was very professional like I always am, but honestly I’ve got mixed emotions on this one. I don’t know how many people share this opinion, but I’m one to think that ambulance bills are a tad on the too expensive side. I don’t think that cost should be a deterrent to people calling for emergency assistance. On the other hand, this person is a resident of one of the jurisdictions I work for and I don’t think that our bills are out of line. I wish I could have told this person that they had the ability to help their own problem with the bill by simply paying more of their share of the ambulance service though their taxes. The money’s gotta come from somewhere, folks. People need 24 hour ambulance coverage and more lives are saved (debatably to some, but not to me) by 24hr paramedic coverage. While I would do this job for free, and do so by volunteering my time in some places, I also have to eat

So I don’t have the answer, even though I would like to say that I did. I think that it’s too complex of an issue in order for there to be a magic fix to the entire situation. If there were, I think that despite the political forces at work, someone would have put it into place by now. I will say that the “Fee For Service” model of ambulance revenue is failing. You know, the one where we only intake revenue if we transport and the volume of transports is supposed to be able to pay for everything. Well, what if you’re in a small town that cannot support a high volume of transports like I am? Or what if you’re in a big city like The Happy Medic (follow @CoEMS on Twitter!) and a high percentage of your patients can not or will not pay you for your services?

The fix, in my opinion, to find new revenue sources for EMS. If you look at professions with the highest salaries, they’re the ones where the people earning those salaries earn large amounts of revenue for the company. Say someone in sales whose salary is commission-based and is dependent on making large sales, or large amounts of small sales, or an athlete who not only fills the stands but also earns tons of money from licensed products. EMS people don’t do that, for the most part our patients cannot afford what we charge them and aren’t using their disposable income to pay our salaries. We’ve got two sources, Secondary payers (Medicare/Medicaid/insurance) whose revenue depend on NOT paying as much as possible, and tax revenue. Yes, there are some that rely solely on one or the other, but most services that I’ve seen rely on both.

So what do we do? As I’ve said, I don’t have the answer and I’m pretty much winging this post from this point on. I don’t know. I’ve thought about adding home care services, having EMTs and Paramedics staff a community health-care clinic, and even working a 2nd job while on-duty (really, I’ve picked up an application from the local McDonalds to see if I could park the ambulance out back and flip burgers for a while in between calls – I’m only half-way joking about that) to increase the revenue potential for me personally.

Hey, maybe that’s the answer. Could we get the local ERs to let us staff them as techs whilst on duty? The local clinics? Dialysis facilities?

No, probably not…

Help. I can’t finish this because I don’t have a good idea. Maybe I will later, because I’m thinking of this issue pretty hard lately. I need EMS to pay better. You probably do too. Let’s work this out.


Random Plugin By Best Account Services