Skip to content


GPS in the Ambulance – An overreliance on Ms. Kitty

16 comments

Actual conversation between me and my partner a few years ago right after receiving an emergency call:

Me:        “Lemme get this on the map… I think it’s South of us. Head South… Southeast! Yeah, it’s Southeast of us”

Her:       “Whattaya mean Southeast!? I don’t know directions. You’ll have to tell me Left or Right!”

Me:        < Scanning the map> “Um… Ok, we’re heading North, so make a Right up here on River Drive and head to Mulford. The street is right off of State and Mulford, one West and two South”

Her:       “It’s what?”

Me:        “Just head to State and Mulford and I’ll get ya in

Remember that? Remember those days when we used to use paper maps? I do. Man, those days were crazy… back when we had to use those archaic things, right?

Actual conversation between me and a different partner in the much more recent past while driving to an emergency call:

Me:        “Dang it! The GPS won’t get satellite signal! I can’t lock in the address”

Him:       “Where do I turn? What street is it off of?”

Me:        “Hang on, I’ll try to look up the address from my phone… Gah! Why is the connection so slow!?”

Him:       “I’m going to turn down this street… what was the address again??”

Me:        “Um… I think it was… 432 Mulberry… I think… Don’t we have a paper map in this truck???”

Him:       “I didn’t see one. Maybe I can get the address on my phone.”

Me:        “Wait, is that a cop up ahead? I think he’s at the call, drive up there.”

Cop:       “Hey! What took you guys so long!?”

Ain’t modern technology great?

It was only a few years ago that we got GPS machines in the ambulances I ran in. Previous to that we had survived off of our “Stacy Maps” which were these awesome map books designed by a local company. They weren’t sexy or technologically sufficient for the times… but they always got the job done if you knew how to use them. Sure, they were hard to read by yourself if you were the only one navigating the truck, but they worked… every time. No outside force could stop them from working. If you had one, you weren’t lost, period.

Now, with our increasing reliance on the magic voice in the GPS box (I call my GPS voice Ms. Kitty) we seem to be able to get to our calls seamlessly and smoothly… 90% of the time. There are times when the GPS doesn’t work, times when it’s just too darn slow, and times when it doesn’t have an address to lock in to. The GPS just isn’t always optimized for emergency response. I’ve found that my GPS is great when I am dispatched to 9933 Harrison St as a physical address… but not so much when I’m dispatched to “The bike path in the field behind Costco off of the side road next to the blue house”.

I remember a call I got once when I was working a relief shift at a contracted rural station. We had just cleared a call from a downtown hospital when the service got a call for a nasty auto wreck out in the country. Their dispatch asked us to respond as the third ambulance. I usually worked in the city the hospital was in so I knew how bad the regular routes were clogged with construction, being as it was summer in the Midwest. I drove and was able to use my knowledge of the city to get us around every bit of it. I took State St to Prospect, Prospect to Guilford, Guilford to Highcrest, Highcrest to Springcreek, Springcreek to Springbrook, Springbrook to Perryville, to… well, you get the idea. I was able to bob and weave through that city so much that we arrived at the scene in record time… which was just in time to be cancelled and sent back to quarters.

What I’m saying is that I knew the city so well because I had been forced to learn how to navigate it by reading paper maps. A skill that sadly, I’m afraid we’re losing as we increase our reliance on the magic directional box and the voices inside of it. GPS is a great tool, but since a huge part of our effectiveness as EMS people is actually being able to arrive at an address in a timely manner, it can’t be our only tool to find one. If you're relying on your GPS as the only tool you have to find the address of an emergency call, you're turning your GPS machine into a life-safety device. I'm sure the manufacturer will agree that It was never intended to be one of those.

My advice is to learn to love your paper maps. Read them. Study them as much as you study your medical protocols. Drive around your wider response area without turning on your GPS. Get lost in it every now and then and try to find your way around. Be sure to pay attention to the hundred blocks, the street names, and the short cuts. Don’t become clueless when Ms. Kitty takes a coffee break.

———————————————————————-

For more of my “You Kids Get Off My Lawn!!” ramblings, you may want to check out “Those Darn Kids!”

Blood Pressure – Vital Knowledge for EMS

12 comments

The blood pressure is one of the most ubiquitous diagnostic tools used in medicine and has a sacred role in EMS. Every EMT and Paramedic needs to be able to get an accurate blood pressure from every patient, every time. It is so widely regarded throughout medicine as a useful diagnostic tool that it’s considered to be one of the “Vital Signs” and pretty much everyone reading this has either taken someone’s blood pressure, and/or has had theirs taken many times.

Of course we know that the blood pressure is the measure of the heart’s ability to pump blood throughout the body. It’s simple, right: Cardiac Output – Vascular resistance = BP. The blood pressure is represented as a number *slash* number, or “Something *over* something” measured in “mmHg” (millimeters of mercury). These numbers represent the “Systolic” and the “Diastolic” pressures, with the Systolic blood pressure meaning the peak fluid pressure of blood flowing through the arteries at “systole”, or the heart’s peak contractile force; and the Diastolic blood pressure measuring the pressure of blood in the arteries when the heart is at “diastole”, or at rest. EMS people use the blood pressure to see how well the patient is “Perfusing” or circulating blood and the oxygen and nutrients it carries to the end tissues it supplies. “Hypotension” is too low of a blood pressure and can result in tissue damage, tissue death, and/or Shock; and “Hypertension” is too high of a blood pressure and can result in all kinds of short and long-term damage to the body, including heart disease, kidney disease, stroke, and many other chronic conditions. In EMS, we use the blood pressure as an important diagnostic tool in such things as trauma to measure blood loss, and also in medical care to determine shock or cardiac compromise.

But we all know the basics, right? Good, if you’re an EMT, you probably should know all that. However, you may not have heard these terms:

  • Pulse Pressure: The difference between the Systolic Blood Pressure and the Diastolic blood pressure. For example, a patient with a BP of 120/80 has a Pulse Pressure of 40mmhg.
  • Stroke Volume: A measure of the volume of blood ejected with each beat. (Stroke volume + Pulse rate = Cardiac Output)
  • Preload: A measurement of the pressure left in the vascular system during Diastole (Or “Left Ventricular End Diastolic Pressure” I’m just going to call it preload)
  • Afterload: The pressure that chambers of the heart must generate in order to pump blood. In the case of the Left Ventricle, it’s the pressure it must create through contraction in order to pump blood into the aorta.

(For everything else you’ve ever wanted to know about blood pressure, read this: “Overview of Blood Pressure” by John Ross)

What if there were more things that taking a patient’s blood pressure could tell you about them?

There are, of course. The blood pressure is way more useful as a diagnostic tool than most EMTs and Paramedics realize. Here are some of the things that the simple blood pressure can help you learn about your patients and the care they need:

———————————————————————————

It can diagnose Orthostatic Hypotension

Have you ever seen a medical provider take “Orthostatic Blood Pressures?” These are taken as three consecutive blood pressure measurements taken with the patient in the Supine (laying down), Sitting upright, and Standing position. To properly perform this, have the patient lay supine for five minutes and take a baseline blood pressure measurement. Then have the patient sit upright, wait two minutes then take their blood pressure. Repeat with the patient in a standing position. If the patient gets dizzy for more than a minute with positional changes, that’s a positive sign for orthostatic hypotension, as is a drop in systolic blood pressure by 20mmhg between readings.

What does this mean?

Well, it can mean that the patient is dehydrated, is experiencing hypovolemic shock, has some type of cardiac compromise or an arrythmia, is anemic, has a problem regulating their blood pressure, has an electrolyte imbalance, and a few other conditions. It can also be caused by medications such as Beta Blockers or even Viagra. Orthostatic Hypotension is also a common cause of Syncope, or fainting. It’s an important assessment finding to record in your patient care report and to pass on to the receiving facility.

(Read More? http://www.medicinenet.com/orthostatic_hypotension/page2.htm)

———————————————————————————

It can help diagnose a Thoracic Aneurism

The arms are the most common places where the blood pressure is measured. The blood pressure cuff aka a “Sphygmomanometer” is wrapped around the arm at the bicep and applies pressure to occlude the brachial artery. The brachial artery is supplied by the subclavian artery, of which there are the Right and the Left subclavian arteries respectively. It has been shown that there may be a normal 10 to 20mmHg difference in blood pressure between the arms in a small minority of patients. Therefore it is important to take blood pressure readings from both arms when diagnosing hypertension. It is also useful to note when there is a difference in readings above 20mmHg from one arm to another. This can be a sign of Increased intra-thoracic pressure, a Thoracic Aneurism, or something called “Subclavian Steal Syndrome”.

In a thoracic aneurism, a condition with a mortality rate reaching up to 80%, the aortic arch in the chest is compromised. This results in severe pain (usually described as “ripping” or “tearing”), hypotension, and usually death if it ruptures. As the aneurism tears, it compromises the entrance to the right subclavian artery before the left, causing the blood pressure in the right arm to drop. This is an important diagnostic tool to use in diagnosing chest pain and should be documented.

———————————————————————————

 It can help detect increased intrathoacic pressure and other conditions

The thoracic cavity is the area commonly called the chest and is the area above the diaphragm protected by and enclosed in the rib cage. As we know, there are a lot of important things in there that humans need functioning properly in order to, you know, live. Pulsus Paradoxus is a condition where the heart’s pumping capacity is compromised by the thoracic pressure and the blood pressure rises and falls with inspiration and exhalation. The blood pressure drops (and sometimes even the radial pulse disappears) with inspiration and rises again with exhalation based upon the volume/pressure of air in the chest. The “paradox” results from the fact that you can hear cardiac beats on auscultation of (listening to) the chest, but cannot detect them with the blood pressure and/or pulse.

What does this mean?

Lots of conditions can cause Pulsus Paradoxus and roughly they can be broken down into three groups: Cardiac causes, Pulmonary Causes, and Other causes.

First, let’s give a nod to the other causes, the non-cardiac and non-pulmonary causes, which are Anaphylaptic Shock and an obstruction of the superior vena cava.

The cardiac causes can be:   (and THANK YOU Wikipedia for being smarter than me and very accessible)

  • cardiac tamponade – A “bruise” of the heart resulting in the pericardial sac filling with blood that cannot escape and compromises cardiac function. (Treated with a pericardiocentesis, which some EMS providers can do in the field. I can).
  • constrictive pericarditis – Inflammation or purulent (puss-filled) infection of the heart which compromises pumping ability.
  • pericardial effusion – Fluid around the heart
  • pulmonary embolism – A blockage in the pulmonary artery or vein
  • cardiogenic shock – Impaired pumping ability of the heart due to cardiac damage or other compromise. Commonly seen in severe myocardial infarctions. (Heart attacks)

It can also be caused by pulmonary (lung) conditions, such as a tension pnuemothorax, COPD, and sometimes in severe and acute asthma, where the patient traps so much inhaled air in the lungs that they cannot exhale the excess pressure due to the inflammation of the air passages.

When you see these signs, make sure to take multiple blood pressure measurements to trend the patient’s progression. Calculate their Pulse Pressures, as cardiac tamponade, tension pneumothorax,  and other conditions are characterized by narrowing of pulse pressure and compromised cardiac output also resulting in hypotension.

—————————————————————-

 It can help detect a closed head injury, stroke, or Intracranial Hemorrhage (<– that’s an excellent link)

Cushing’s Triad, aka Cushing’s reflex, is a group of symptoms that has been shown to reveal increased intracranial pressure (ICP), the pressure within the cranial vault around the brain. This reflex shows three distinct signs which are predictive of Stroke (both ischemic and hemorrhagic), intracranial bleeding, head trauma, and some other conditions that raise ICP. These signs are:

  • Slowed pulse rate
  • Markedly increased systolic pressure (high BP) with widened pulse pressure, as the diastolic pressure usually stays normal, and:
  • Irregular breathing (Cheyne-Stokes pattern respirations)

Any time you suspect an injury or condition that may raise ICP, check the blood pressure and look for Cushing’s Reflex. It can help you zero in on the patient’s condition.

———————————————————————

Here are some tips for making sure your blood pressures count:

  • Automatic BP cuffs do an ok job of measuring the blood pressure in a routine setting, but they have weaknesses. They cannot detect pulsus paradoxus, they give wildly inaccurate readings in bradycardia (slow heart rate), and they’re very much affected by the bumps in the road felt in the back of an ambulance. TAKE AT LEAST ONE OR TWO MANUAL BLOOD PRESSURES.

 

  • Can’t hear the systolic pressure? Take a palpated blood pressure by feeling the radial pulse while you deflate the cuff. The first pulse you feel = a reasonably accurate systolic pressure.

 

  • As with a lot of diagnostic tools, the first blood pressure measurement is a spot-check. The second reading creates a trend and reveals a lot more information. Take them every 5-10 minutes on critical patients, and every 10-15 on stable ones, keep mindful of the pattern.

This is by no means an exhaustive list, but it should give you some more respect for the humble blood pressure. As always, follow your local protocols and medical orders and this article isn’t meant as medical advice. Keep learning out there.

Also, feel free to add things in the comments section. I’d love to see what I missed.

——————————————————————-

Want to learn more stuff about stuff? Check out:

 

 

EMS Narrative Report – Ckemtp on the MedicCast EMS Podcast

No comments

EMS Narrative Report writing is one of the most important skills an EMT or Paramedic should hone in order to make themselves a better provider. They can improve their long-term patient care, and improve the image of the profession in other healthcare providers' eyes through a well-written, informative narrative report. Not only is a properly documented EMS narrative report critical for communicating vital information about the events of an ambulance call, it also helps shape a patient's overall progression through the healthcare system. Last but definitely not least, a well-written EMS narrative report can keep your butt out of legal hot water and may just save your career. 

Recently, Jamie Davis invited me to speak on the MedicCast EMS podcast, his ever popular educational EMS show that comes out every Monday. In this two-part series, we discuss my piece: "Six Tricks You Can Use Today to Improve Your EMS Narrative Report." and various other ways an EMT can improve their narrative report-writing skills. As always, Jamie offers excellent guidance on the topic which helps drown out my babbling.

If you'd like to download it, head to the post page by clicking HERE or clicking on the logo on the Right.

Otherwise, you can view it here.

Part two will be posted here when it comes up. Look for it next week!

Also, look for all of my stuff on EMS Narrative Reporting, click here.

 

Eight Ways you can Ace your Patient Assessment – EMS

3 comments

The patient assessment is probably the most important skill every EMS person should master in order to be a truly exceptional EMT. No matter the call, no matter the patient, the EMS provider needs to be able to rapidly zero in on a complaint, make a working diagnosis, and provide adequate treatment for the patient’s condition. This skill is more important than any other simply because if you don’t know what is going on with the patient, you can’t know how to treat them.

Patient assessment has been taught many ways over the years by different versions of the EMT curriculum. I was taught that each patient gets three different types of assessment during the course of an encounter with EMS. These are: The Primary Assessment, the Secondary Assessment, and the Ongoing Assessment. Each of these three types of assessments is valuable to the EMT or Paramedic in determining what is really wrong with the patient. They’re designed to function in concert, each giving more information to the EMS provider that they can use in formulating an effective treatment plan. The more detailed they are, the better treatment decisions they allow and the better the patient’s overall progression through the healthcare system will be. Every patient should get all three of these assessments. EVERY PATIENT, EVERY CALL, EVERY TIME. Whether the call is a 911 emergency fall off of a cliff or a simple discharge back to a nursing home, every patient you come into contact with in your entire career should get your best assessment. It’s something you just can’t skip.

Take a look at the three general types of assessments:

  • The PRIMARY ASSESSMENT: The quickest assessment in the EMS toolkit, it is the first impression you make of your patient. It is intended to rapidly identify life-threatening conditions and facilitate immediate stabilizing treatment. In this assessment you should check for Airway Patency (openness), Breathing (Rate, quality, presence), and Circulation (Pulse, blood pressure, and Skin perfusion – Color, temperature, and moisture). You should also check for gross deformity, major trauma and/or blood loss, or anything else that may cause the patient to crash. If found, you should act immediately to provide stabilizing treatment. This is also where you should determine the chief complaint, the need for spinal immobilization, and form your general impression of the overall patient condition.

 

 

  • The Ongoing Assessment: The previous two assessments are useful in determining your patient’s baseline presentation and making your working field diagnosis. However, your assessment doesn’t stop there. The Ongoing Assessment is used to monitor changes in the patient’s condition and to get a trend of their progression, good or bad. You can measure the effectiveness of your treatments and see how their condition is progressing. This could be as simple as asking a patient “Do you feel any better or worse?” and rechecking their vital signs, or as in-depth as redoing your entire secondary assessment. Monitor every patient closely for changes. Recheck vitals every 5-10 minutes for compromised patients, and every 10-15 for stable ones.

Here are some tricks you can use to nail your assessment:

  1. Just Do It! – Remember, you can’t over-assess your patient. The more information you get the better. Every patient gets a full assessment, every time. Even if you can’t act on the information you gather, the information could prove invaluable to healthcare providers further down the road. They need good information on the acute phase of the patient’s illness. Remember, the EMT is “the eyes and ears of the physician in the field.” You’d never see a physician diagnose a patient without a thorough exam, don’t skip it either.

 

  1. Standardize! – Develop a standard assessment that covers at least all of the stuff I talked about above, and do it every time. Start at the head and work your way down. Think up a set of questions you want to know the answers to about your patient, and answer them every time. Not only will practicing the assessment get it down to a science, you’ll also get very quick at it. This also can help you with your narrative report writing. You can put the answers to all of your questions in your patient care report, and that’s a great way to write a narrative.

                                                    

  1. Start your assessment the second you arrive on scene – Start gathering information about the patient immediately. Note the ambient temperature. Note the condition of the patient’s living space and where you found them. If the patient is at home, look for adequate food and water. Check for disease vectors such as filth. You may want to ask the patient about their living conditions later, such as asking them if they’ve been sleeping upright in a chair when checking for CHF. Any information you gather is useful.

 

  1. Check THESE THREE THINGS when you first encounter the patient – Always introduce yourself to the patient using your name and while you’re doing this, feel their radial pulse with your fingers. This tells you three immediately important things that will drive the rest of your care: The status of their Airway, Breathing, and Circulation. You’ll feel the rate and quality of their pulse; feel their skin temperature, moisture, and condition; and be able to assess their work of breathing when they answer you back from your introduction. If any of these things are compromised… the patient is probably sick and in need of intervention.

 

  1. Try to determine the patient’s ultimate diagnosis – What, you’re scared of making a diagnosis because you’ve heard that medics don’t diagnose? That’s BS. We diagnose all the time, we just don’t make the final diagnosis. Call it a “Field Diagnosis” if you want, but I say you should try to piece together the symptoms your patient is having and try to diagnose the cause. If you don’t know the answer, fire up the Google and do some research. You’ll be surprised at what you can learn that way. Also, talk to the receiving physicians and nurses at the ER. You’ll learn a vast amount of information that will make you a better provider overall.

 

  1. Be as thorough as time will allow – Certainly, there are times where an EMT will be focused on immediately stabilizing treatment, such as airway management or hemorrhage control and won’t be able to hit all of the possible nooks and crannies of a patient assessment. However, most patients aren’t that severe and you’ll have time to gather all of the information you can. The more you assess the better information you can collect and pass on. Check for such things as: Pulsus paradoxus; a difference in blood pressure between the arms; the Babinski Sign; hidden trauma; Cushing’s Triad; and many other interesting things. You’ll learn a lot, and might just catch a few zebras.

 

  1. Don’t afraid to touch the patient – You’re a medical person. Medical people touch other people. Sometimes they see them naked. Sometimes it’s uncomfortable and sometimes you have to touch them in a way that wouldn’t otherwise be socially acceptable. Of course, don’t do anything wrong, illegal, or immoral… but when you’re checking for a broken leg you have to touch the leg. Actually Look at, Listen to, and Feel your patients. Be a professional.

 

  1. Know what “normal” is, and look for things that aren’t – Eventually, once you master the art of determining what a normal presentation is, the things that are abnormal will jump out at you. Once you’ve practiced and honed your assessment skills, you’ll be able to see any abnormalities with relative ease. It takes practice, but developing the skill is well worth the effort.

Employ these tricks and you’ll be well on your way to mastering the art of the assessment. Always learn and strive to improve your craft. Keep your eyes open and absorb new information. Pretty soon you’ll be amazing your colleagues with what you know and what you can tell them about your patients.

——————————–

Want more information on the patient assessment?

Read – Assessing Greatness: Catching the stuff you’re supposed to

Or – Ten (or so) Things You Should Try to do with Every Patient

Also, Check out TheEMTspot.com’s “Mastering the Head to Toe Assessment”

EMS 12-lead Case – Ischemia and Failure

8 comments

If you haven’t been to www.EMS12Lead.com, Tom Bouthillet’s wonderful EMS educational blog… well then I’m going to just come out and say this:

What are you doing here when you should be over there reading his stuff??

Considering how Tom dwarfs my humble traffic numbers (which is something I always kind of knew he did, but didn’t really know how much until I had a few drinks with him at EMS Today and weaseled his numbers out of him) I’ve figured that I’m going to have to do something. I’m going to straight up steal his shtick and write an “educational” EMS 12-lead EKG post of my very own for your reading enjoyment and educational purposes. Heck, I might even be able to make a point or two. Let’s find out.

I keep an archive of interesting tidbits from my EMS career locked up in a vault in my basement and among the oddities and whatnot I have a binder full of 12-leads. I blew the dust off of the old tome and pulled the EKG that I’m using for this story out of the archives. Oh my, this was a doozy. As always with my stories about patients, I may not have ran this one myself and even if I did, I don’t remember where it was that I ran it nor do I remember the age, location, or even the gender of the patient in question. I also have taken the liberty of lying about all of that stuff just to make it even more confusing and difficult for me to write. So, if you think I’m violating the female Hippo, you’re mistaken.

As I recall, the call was toned out with the dispatch information of a “64yo M Pt unable to breathe”. It wasn’t a long distance away and Our Intrepid Paramedic (OIP) responded in a response vehicle being followed up by an ambulance which arrived shortly after He did. It was a nice, well kept residence and the wife of the Pt let OIP in the door as he entered the home. She indicated that the Pt was in a back bedroom of the house and motioned down the hallway. OIP made the trek and found the Pt sitting upright on his bed, Conscious, Alert, and Oriented times 3 (CAOx3) with somewhat increased work of breathing. The patient stated that he had been experiencing pain that he indicated began at the level of his mandible and continued to his epigastrum (his Jaw to his Gut). He stated that the pain had simply become too much for him this evening and that it became very hard to breathe when he laid down for bed. A good look at him was all it really took for OIP to make a working diagnosis after feeling the patent’s weak and irregular radial pulse and pale, cool, and moist skin. OIP placed the patient on 6-LPM oxygen via Nasal Cannula and told the ambulance medic to break out a 12-lead. The initial rhythm strip showed a sinus bradycardia with an IVCD and lots of multifocal ectopy, including multifocal couplets and triplets. The 12-lead was no better. It showed bad, bad mojo. This poor guy was sick.

EEEEEEEeeeeeeeeeeeek

As the ambulance crew was packaging up on the stretcher to take the Patient to the ambulance, OIP had a few moments to speak with the patient’s wife. She told OIP that the patient had been experiencing pain in his jaw for the last week. She also told OIP that the patient had gone to see his Primary Care physician two days prior and had been told to take advil for the pain in his jaw. She told OIP about how the patient had been very lethargic lately and about how he would become winded when taking out the garbage and walking even shorter distances. She told OIP about how the pain had been getting steadily worse… and also how the doctor said he was fine.

And with a symptom profile of exertional fatigue, difficult breathing, jaw pain,  substernal chest pain, and diaphoresis… what doctor wouldn’t say that… right? Oh wait… hopefully most of them.

The patient wasn’t having a heart attack… he had been having a heart attack for days and now the damage had been done. This was a clear case of the patient not being educated to the symptoms of a heart attack… or of ignoring them in the hopes that they’d just go away. The physician did not obtain a 12-lead nor do lab work and did not diagnose the problem as being cardiac ischemia (Heart attack) when the patient presented for care.

But OIP did… about 2 minutes after meeting the patient he woke up the cardiologist and the cath lab team at a hospital a half-hour’s drive away to help take care of the man. You’ve seen the 12-lead above. It indicates a heart that is in serious trouble. The patient was treated per protocol, which included high-flow o2, bilateral IVs, NTG tablets and paste, and I’m not sure what else the ambulance paramedic did because OIP didn’t accompany the patient to the hospital. That,  and it was too long ago for me to remember what happened… I just know the patient made it there alive to find out whatever his prognosis was going to be from the cardiology team at the ER.

Here’s the deal, once this patient called the ambulance, his care was stellar. OIP and the other EMTs did a fantastic job at rapid recognition, appropriate stabilizing care, and swift transport to an appropriate care facility as none of the local hospitals had the capacity to care for this guy. The EMS people did what they were trained, equipped, and supposed to do. The problem is they were called way too late to make much of a difference in the patient’s continuing quality of life.

I can understand that patients don’t necessarily know when they’re having a heart attack. To a layperson, jaw pain and fatigue could just be the flu. Chest pain could just be heartburn, and exertional dyspnea could just mean that a person has been “pushing themselves too hard lately”. All of those symptom profiles could mean any number of things… but they could also be a heart attack. I can understand how people want to think that they’re not having a heart attack. I get that no one wants to have one. They’re not fun and we as a society may hype them up too much so that people think there is a stigma to the diagnosis. I don’t know if that statement is true, but it sure seems that way sometimes to me.

What I can’t understand is how a patient can present for treatment at a physician’s office with clear symptoms of cardiac ischemia (heart attack) and not be checked for it. I’d like to think that a paramedic would rule it out first and foremost… and I don’t understand why someone wouldn’t.

Then again, I don’t know the information the physician was working with. Perhaps the patient wasn’t honest with his symptoms and tried to minimize what was going on. That’s possible too, as this patient was a proud man who has lived his life like he could handle anything. People do that. Nobody wants to be sick.

The lesson here is to have a high index of suspicion. Patients sometimes minimize their symptoms, and sometimes they over-dramatize them. Some people don’t want to be sick… and some people want to be sicker than they are. I personally will buy into false drama from someone who’s not as sick as they want to be than chance missing the minimized symptoms of someone who’s sicker. I tell my patients that as a paramedic my job is to “Treat for the Worst, and hope for the best.”

But for this guy, OIP never got the chance. This was too late for that. The damage had been done.

This patient’s quality of life was greatly impacted by the fact that he didn’t call 911 at the first signs of his illness. Had he done so, his prognosis would be much different. A quick exam, 12-lead, and appropriate care would have made this guy’s story quite a bit different. Where was the failure? Was it the patient’s fault for not recognizing and/or minimizing his symptoms? Was it the fault of “health education” in general for not reaching the patient in a manner in which he could understand? Does the fault lie with OIP for not spending enough time educating the public about the symptoms and danger of heart attacks? Does the fault lie with this patient’s doctor for missing the diagnosis and/or not providing proper education beforehand?

I don’t know the answer to the above question either. I just know that OIP and the EMS team treated him well once the call came in. I just wish that something different would have happened in the chance of events that lead up to all of this. It would have made the above 12-lead a lot different.

Be vigilant out there.

Does How Your Brain Works Affect Your Patient Care?

8 comments

Hey everyone, before you read the post below, watch this video. This is part of a test:

Now, after you have watched the above video and reacted to it in some way, read the following humorous statement:

“Some helium floats into a bar. The bartender says “We don’t serve noble gasses here!” The helium doesn’t react.”

(Ok, if you’re not a nerd.. The noble gasses (of which helium is one of) are non-reactive. Ha!)

Which one of those two things made you laugh harder, if at all? Did you have a positive or negative reaction to either of them? Both?

The reason I ask this, is because I told my partner that joke about the helium today. His reaction: “Wow… All that knowledge and you still can’t tile your bathroom floor.” He came to EMS after being a contractor and working in the trades. You know, doing stuff that you have to do with your hands. I did too, honestly, since I pretty much grew up on a farm with a father who owned a hardware store. So you’d think I’d be handier than I actually am. I can fix things, sure… but I certainly couldn’t build a house. That’s just not how my brain works.

Years ago, while working in an emergency room I overheard two physicians having a discussion about another ER physician who was very popular with his coworkers and patients. This doctor was friendly, jovial, kind, and nice. I liked him quite a bit and was a little weary of the other two docs talking about him. They talked about how nice this other doctor was to all of his patients and how they wished they could have him follow them around to all of their own patients and be the “nice” doctor who made their patients feel better while they attended simply to the cold, hard realities of their patient’s medical needs. Their solution was that a happy medium could not be reached, and that a healthcare provider was either “too nice and incompetent” or “competent, but a jerk”.

And today, after my coworker brought up the severe need for a new tile floor in my bathroom, I thought back to that conversation. He and I are both paramedics. While I’m more experienced and have been a paramedic for more than a decade longer than he, He and I both take care of the same types of patients with the same types of complaints and make similar results. We follow the same standing medical orders and work under the same medical director in the same ambulances. However, since his brain works so very differently than does mine, how can we possibly achieve the same results?

People choose their physicians based upon their personalities as much as they do anything. They want to develop trust in their doctor, and the interpersonal relationship between doctor and patient on outcomes has been widely speculated upon and researched. I wonder if the same phenomenon exists within EMS. Does the way our personalities, experiences, strengths, weaknesses, and other traits affect our patient outcomes? If my brain is wired so very differently from my partners, how does that affect his patients’ care over my own?

I don’t have the answer to the questions I’ve asked here, but I’ve become pretty curious about this over the last hour or so. To help answer the question of what personality type you think makes the best type of paramedic or EMT, I ask you to write your opinion in the comment section below. I think that we might get some pretty darn interesting answers. 

Be sure to put which humorous thing you most enjoyed above somewhere in the comment.

(Oh, and so two Atoms were walking down the street. One said “Oh no! I’ve lost an electron!” to which the other replies “Are you positive??”)

 (Also, my friend with the Ph D in chemistry said that the helium joke was “A real ARGON-er” – Get it? Ha! Nerd humor is nerdy)

Assessing Greatness – Catching the stuff you’re supposed to

4 comments

What the heck is wrong with this guy!? You just can’t figure this one out and your patient seems to be crashing before your eyes. You were originally called for the “Unconscious unknown” at a party house frequented by college students and found the 28 or so year-old male unresponsive. Everything you check seems to be a dead end. His heart rate is fine, but slowing… His respirations are adequate but you’re certainly considering getting out the bag-valve-mask… You’re popped your line and given 2 full milligrams of Narcan but that hasn’t had any response. His pupils are PERRL but sluggish. His skin is pale, cool, and moist but not diaphoretic… and there doesn’t seem to be any trauma. Everything with this guy is a dead end treatment wise and you decide that this guy simply needs to be treated with diesel. You have your partner hop up front, turn on the twinkles and the woo-woos and beat feet to the hospital. All the way you check and recheck, trying to figure out if you can fix this guy. Unfortunately, you don’t make any headway before you reach the ER.

After you finish cleaning and restocking the truck to return to service from the ER you walk past the patient’s room on your way to get a cup of coffee. You’re shocked to see that the patient is sitting up, is alert and talking, and seems to be doing just fine. Incredulously, you ask the nurse what happened. She asks you what the reading you got for the patient’s blood sugar in the field was, and before your mouth can speak, all of the voices in your head seem to scream at you in unison “Holy Flying Pig Tarts!!” you forgot to check the patient’s blood sugar, thinking that it was most probably a narcotic overdose. The ER didn’t however, and found that the patient’s blood glucose was 20.

Have we all been there? Can we just admit that we all have found ourselves in this or a similar situation at least once or twice in our storied careers? As much as I am ashamed to admit it, I have found myself in similar situations where it seems I just messed up and left out an important part of my assessment. Somehow, something important like taking a quick blood glucose reading on an unresponsive is going to slip your mind somewhere in your career and in your adventures in the field and it’s going to bite both you and your patient in the hindquarters. Mistakes, or rather oversights like this are all too common in all branches of medicine because we as the healthcare professionals are simply human beings trying to absorb and process way too many pieces of information at once.

Much has been decried about the practice of “Defensive Medicine” where healthcare providers, mostly physicians, order unnecessary tests simply to avoid missing an obscure case and being sued because of it. People are constantly irradiated for unnecessary X-Rays, CT scans, and other such tests or so say the detractors of these practices. They say that it exposes patients to unnecessary testing, causes a false sense of security, and drives up the costs of healthcare exponentially. Popular culture has even jumped on the bandwagon, with the heroes of popular medical dramas coming out against the practice and being regarded as cowboys or mavericks. The public then eats it up… until they have a headache and don’t get a CT scan to ease their worried nerves.

However, not all practice of defensive medicine is a bad thing and in fact, in EMS I believe that this practice can be a good thing. I have long believed in my career and in my professional paramedic practice that every patient deserves a thorough and standardized assessment. Sure, I am pretty darn good at coming up with my working diagnosis based upon my solid initial assessment with a few secondary and tertiary assessment tricks to narrow in on the diagnosis and get my differentials, but the foundation remains the same. Everybody gets the same head to toe assessment. I’ve standardized it so that I don’t miss anything… or at least that I don’t miss as much as is possible not to miss. Standardizing your assessment and performing the same assessment on every patient every time becomes a security blanket and helps keep your assessment skills sharp with every call. Sure, it may seem silly to listen to lung sounds on a patient with a twisted ankle, or to check pupil reaction on the finger amputation, but you don’t have to let the patient know you’re doing it. Just look at them. Make sure you hit every high point in your standardized assessment with every patient, and you’ll catch a lot more zebras than you’ll miss.

In addition, there are some ground rules that I follow with certain types of patients and those fancy diagnostic tools that they give us to play with. First and foremost, if they say that skin condition, color, temperature, and moisture is the fourth vital sign, then blood-glucose level is the fifth. Sure, not every patient needs a lancet poked into their finger to have the machine read the number, but certainly every patient with an altered level of consciousness does. Even if you think the cause of the patient’s condition is something else, like the patient I had the other shift who was hypotensive and septic with a high fever, check it anyway… because the patient in the above example had a blood glucose of 40mg/dl and responded quite well to some fluid and the D-50 I gave him. Other patients who may not need to be poked can still have hyper of hypoglycemia ruled out by asking them their bladder habits (hyperurination), their last oral intake (Have they eaten enough not to be hypoglycemic) and other sugary questions.

Then, there’s the 12-lead. Can I just say that I see darn near close to zero reason that every patient who gets into an ambulance cannot get a 12-lead EKG done on them? To be sure, I don’t give every patient a 12-lead… but for anything that could be even remotely cardiac related I will perform one. Lethargy? Check. Flu like symptoms? Check. Syncope or near-to-it? Check and Check. It takes only a few minutes to perform and you can really make a difference in a patient’s overall healthcare pathway and well being by taking a symptomatic 12-lead tracing and starting the trend of monitoring. Before we all had the tool (Sorry Chicago… you should be catching up with the rest of the world soon) just how many ischemic cardiac events went undetected?

The crime here lies firmly in the realm of the underassessment, not in overassessing. The patient assessment is the cornerstone of everything we do and takes priority to all but the airway, breathing, and circulatory status of all patients. Making sure to be thorough and methodical in your assessment practices saves not only lives, but your own butt in the process. You cannot over assess just as you cannot overeducate yourself as to what potential findings mean. Just as an EMT basic can ask the same questions as the most seasoned paramedic, they can also ask the same questions as an ER doctor with the proper self education.

EMS needs to see itself as playing a role in the overall healthcare system and in the final care pathways for the patients we treat. Becoming an expert at the patient assessment is a big role in this. Remember, you’re the person who sees the patient in the first stages of their acute illness and in their entry into the healthcare system. Your thorough assessment goes a long way into the wellbeing of every patient you touch. Be great at it.

Those Darn Kids!

16 comments

These darn kids and their new-fangled toys!

Hey, at least I aint @FossilMedic 's Age yet.

Call me old fashioned if you want to, but allow me to hike my EMS pants way up higher than my belly button and talk in my Old Grizzled Medic ™ voice for a second here. You see, the kids these days are doing something that just tans my hide. What, with their iPhones, and their iPods, and their iPads, and me with my iGlasses and the Etch-a-Sketch… Confound it! I just don’t understand.

You see, Youngins… back in my day we didn’t have all of these fancy techno-toys that we do now. When it came to running on the ambulance, we made do with what we had and that was the way we liked it. What, with all of the trudging 20 miles to work in the feet of snow uphill with the both ways and whatnot we earned our measly pittances and then trudged back home to our coal-heated shacks to jitterbug away the three hours we got off of work in between our 120 hour shifts. We didn’t need all the pansy stuff you enjoy now.

We did our medical care to the best of our abilities then. We actually had to LIFT our patients into the ambulances on the cot, rather than having the little button lift 700lbs with one finger. We had to look at actual paper maps to find addresses, rather than having the nice lady in the GPS tell us where to go. Heck, we even had to write paper reports on our EMS calls BY HAND USING A PEN.

Paper reports written by hand do one thing and only one thing very well. They suck. They are simply awesome at sucking. They stink on ice. They are medieval torture devices left over from the Monty Python version of the Spanish Inquisition and honestly, the day we switched over to computerized reporting I stabbed a wooden stake through a stack of the dreaded Illinois “Bubble Sheet” EMS report forms. Then I poured gasoline on them, turned around and flicked a match behind my back as I walked away in slow motion without looking back at the explosion and flames. I was wearing sunglasses. It was epic.

It was Just Like This! Only with more geekery and no little girl and I was shirtless...

Paper reports could be documented at the patient’s side but it just always seemed so darn inconvenient to do so. I did it occasionally during long transports, or when we were running back-to-back calls and I wanted to jot down the high-points of each call on the report form so I could accurately remember them when I got the chance to catch up on my paperwork. It wasn’t uncommon to be “down” four or five reports in those days because we were just so dad-gum busy and the reports took so blasted long to `complete. A stack of those paper reports could give you writers’ cramp for days. Especially the Illinois “Bubble Sheet” forms which I used for years, they were awful monstrosities constructed to worship the demon “ScAnTr0nn” who mandated that little bubbles be filled out perfectly for every name, address, and number you scrawled on the form. Those evil little dots cost me hours of my life, a good amount of my hair, and most of my sanity. After using the awful bubble sheets for years, I switched systems to a place that utilized a somewhat less-evil paper report form, and then back to a place that still used the hated bubble sheets, and then Huzzah! To a place that had computers.

Although I must admit that the hand-strength I developed from writing those awful things made my one-handed beer can crushing trick a hit at parties.

The first report I wrote on a computer was a simple little form written on a then state of the art laptop that weighed approximately 17523lbs. It took forever to load, locked up and lost reports frequently, and was an absolute gift from God. Then, the regional EMS system stepped in and put computers in the EMS report rooms at the hospitals because nobody could ever figure out how to hook up their ambulance laptops to the ancient dot-matrix printers they’d provided for us. Those programs were sweet! I hate switching my hand between a mouse and a keyboard 15 times per second to enter data and the reports we used on the desktop were forms I could simply use the keyboard with the whole time. I actually typed faster than the program could keep up and knew just how many times I had to tab through a list to mark the correct spot on the form without seeing it on the screen. I’d end up having the report typed out a few seconds before the machine caught up and put the words on the screen. It. Was. Awesome.

Still, those reports were something that could only be done away from the patient’s side. We all had note pads to jot down info we wanted to put on the report while we were treating the patient and we took those notes to the computer to enter into the report. Nowadays, them kids with their fancy technology have Toughbooks with touch-screens that they use to write their EMS reports and since their invention, I’ve noticed a trend.

It first started when I noticed my medic protégé Chad had a habit of bringing the toughbook in with him to emergency calls. He’d grab the jump kit, the o2 bag, and the computer. Then, while he was interviewing and assessing the patient, he’d be starting their report.

This dismayed me. Again, call me a crazy old coot and an old-fogey… but I believe that we should not only focus 100% on the events of the call and upon what the patient is telling us, but also that we should give the appearance that we are doing so. You just can’t make me believe that a patient is going to feel that we are listening to that which ails them and are paying attention to their needs when we have our nose in a lap-top. Sure, it may save time on the overall reporting process by allowing the EMT to get an early start on the documentation, but it also ends up taking more time on scene to wait for the computer to enter in information. I also think that it takes away the EMTs ability to fully observe everything that is going on with the patient and the scene around them. It robs one of their situational awareness and of the nuances of the patient assessment.

That, and it’s just plain rude.

It bothers me enough that I launched a whole ridicule-based diatribe against my young protégé and shamed him into no longer bringing the computer into calls with him. I have no problem if he begins the report at the patient’s side during transport as long as he has completed everything that needs to be done and he makes sure to monitor the patient thoroughly. That’s cool, I guess. I am glad that he won’t have to suffer the pain of hand-written EMS reporting. That’s a cross us Grizzled Old Medics™ bore for you with honor.

You’re welcome. Now get off my lawn, and STOP USING THE COMPUTER IN FRONT OF THE PATIENT!!

Primary Care Paramedics? I think it’s time

17 comments

Clinically speaking, there’s a whole lot of medicine out there that I don’t know.

I mean, paramedics like me go though a few thousand hours of training in emergency medical care. We get a few years of classes covering the things we need to know about treating the most common of truly emergent medical conditions. Heart attacks? Check. Strokes? Check. Airway Management and Respiratory Support? Check and Check. We paramedics are experts in the acute medical emergency. If you’re dying, we are well equipped and trained to support you until a doctor and a team of medical people in a hospital can take over your care. If you have a medical emergency somewhere outside of a hospital emergency room, we’re the first people you want to see.

The Medic is In

But, what if you have a particularly nasty case of Strep Throat?

Well… that’s called “Primary Care” and it covers a lot of non-emergent medical conditions. Strep throat hurts and it makes a person feel like crap. The times that I’ve chanced to become infected with a nasty strain of Strep “A” it’s made me feel like a warmed-over Code Brown Sandwich. It sucks being sick and that’s why people go to the doctor. Patients present to doctors’ offices for myriad reasons. Pink Eye, Influenza, the “creeping crud”, bronchitis, and gastrointestinal problems are common occurrences there. When I worked at an urgent care clinic we saw plenty of those. Up to two-hundred patients per day came in with just these kinds of complaints. There were lacerations, fractures, and other kinds of cases that came in too. Rarely did we need to call for an ambulance and while we did sometimes advise people to go to the ER on their own, that was rare as well. A good primary care doctor can catch most minor conditions and adequately treat them right there in the clinic, negating any need for an expensive emergency room.

However, the problem lies in actually getting access to a primary care physician to take care of you when you’re sick.

Yesterday, my mother-in-law (I call her “MIL” for short) called me up. One of the people she works with had an injury to his fingernail. He tore a good part of it clean off while working out in their warehouse. It hurt, of course, and it was bleeding. Their company is a small five person shop that they’re building from the ground up. A Workers’ comp claim would go right against their small and shared pocketbook and start-ups don’t have the cash for that kind of stuff. She wanted to know the proper first-aid for this and was trying to avoid the doctor. He was too. As owner of the company he didn’t want to have to pay for it and a fingernail injury just doesn’t seem all that severe. Still, it hurt and they were worried about infection. The guy understandably wanted proper treatment.

I told him that fingernails either grow back, or they don’t. Eventually it would be fine if he cleaned it with mild soap and water and put a non-adhering bandage over the nail bed to keep it clean and protected. I told him in a day or so to put some Vaseline-based antibiotic cream on it as well to keep it moist and stave off infection.

Don’t worry, I wasn’t practicing medicine without a license. I have my First-Aid Merit Badge from the Boy Scouts of America and that was covered somewhere in there, I’m sure. However, you’re right to think that fingernail injuries aren’t covered anywhere in the National Standard EMT or Paramedic curriculum. We are taught to bandage it up and take it to an Emergency Room.

Yep, if he would have presented to my care on the ambulance, I would have had to transport the guy to the ER for a physician to do what I told him to do. If he refused the $500 (or so) transport fee and the (astronomical) ER fee, I would have had to have him sign an “Against Medical Advice” (AMA) refusal form and could not legally give him any medical advice other than to be transported to the ER.

It’s maddening.

Fingernail guy didn’t have an option for treatment where he was other than to go to the ER. In the area where he was located, there aren’t any Urgent Care facilities. There certainly aren’t any cheap ones anywhere you go, but their cost is much lower than the local ER he was near. He didn’t have an option, so he had his coworker call her son-in-law (SIL) for advice. I gave it, and saved everyone involved a few hundred if not a thousand dollars. Sure, the guy could have called his primary care physician and gotten an appointment a month later… but I would think that as a self-employed small-business owner he probably doesn’t have access to health insurance at a less-than-oppressive cost.

A while back, I wrote the piece “Did I do Good?” regarding what I think EMS 2.0 should become. I think that Paramedics should be educated and empowered to step into the realm of primary care and be able to provide primary care in the field. Now to be sure, as Rogue Medic will point out, there’s evidence that states that Paramedics and EMTs are bad at triage and we are not currently equipped with the right education to provide these services at this time. However, I think that educating a group of excellent paramedics to the proper standards, giving them the proper tools, and empowering them with the proper legal authority could revolutionize healthcare.

Every community has a group of paramedics and/or EMTs and nearly every community (I would say every, but I have no stats in front of me) has less-than-optimal access to primary care across the spectrum of patient populations. To me, there is a clear solution that makes sense. Could Paramedics, once properly educated, equipped, and empowered, provide limited primary care services, appropriate triage, and transfer in the field? How about at fixed sites and clinics? We could follow protocols, utilize tele-medicine, and function much as we do now, but with a much lower-acuity class of patients.

Sure, there are Nurse Practitioners, Physicians’ Assistants, and other healthcare providers that can provide these services, but let them work with us as we work with them. There doesn’t have to be an adversarial relationship. We all have different training and that one set can be used to compliment the other. 

EMS 2.0 is about thinking outside the box for EMS. It’s about finding new ways to face the challenges. Thinking the way we have in the past won’t fix the problems that it failed to fix before. My belief is that with Paramedics providing Primary Care, we would greatly increase access to care, more properly triage patients to the proper healthcare pathways, save gobs and gobs of money, and just might “fix” this whole healthcare mess without all that legislation and legal wrangling.

Any suggestions on where we begin?

Colorado CRNAs Vs. Virginia Physicians? An interesting feud for EMS

24 comments

This article came across my Twitter stream this morning. It regards a letter sent to the Centers for Medicare/Medicaid Services by the Governor of Colorado informing them that in some Colorado hospitals it is now acceptable for Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetists to work independently of physician supervision.

The article, which is in the form of a letter written to the editor of The Aspen Times, is written by a Dr. Paul Rein who is the President of the Virginia Anesthesia and Peroperative Care Specialists. He takes issue with the lack of physician oversight and is “quite concerned” about it.

I think that the letter is important for EMS people to read. Especially us EMS people that are looking at how to expand our profession, grow our scope of practice, and expand our skill sets. It shows that there are struggles over these kinds of boundary and oversight issues all over the healthcare arena and that the politics and power struggles aren’t just limited to those of us that ride ‘round in ambulances.

The full text of the letter can be found here at The Aspen Times: http://www.aspentimes.com/article/20101004/LETTER/101009942/1020&ParentProfile=1061

The parallels I can draw from this issue to EMS are striking and enlightening. Here are some of the parts of the letter that I found the most interesting:

“A nurse anesthetist is an advanced practice registered nurse who has received special training to administer anesthesia, usually being supervised by an anesthesiologist. Anesthesiologists are physicians who, after medical school, receive an additional four to five years of specialized training during residency. Not only do anesthesiologists function in the operating room but they are trained to medically evaluate patients prior to surgery and to take care of problems that may arise immediately after surgery. In a few small hospitals a nurse anesthetist may be supervised by the surgeon if there is no anesthesiologist.”

I was curious as to the educational standards of a Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetist and so I went to their National Association’s web site: Http://www.AANA.com – It says this:

“The requirements for becoming a Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetist (CRNA) mainly include having a bachelor’s degree in nursing, or other appropriate baccalaureate degree, Registered Nurse licensure, a minimum of 1 year acute care experience (ICU, ER for example), and the successful completion of both an accredited nurse anesthesia educational program and the certification examination.”

(Source: http://www.aana.com/BecomingCRNA.aspx?id=98&linkidentifier=id&itemid=98)

Huh.

Actually, I wasn’t familiar with the requirements for a CRNA before I read that, but it says that they have to have:

  • A four year degree in Something
  • Licensure as a Registered Nurse
  • A minimum of One Year Acute care experience
  • Completed an Accredited training program
  • A passing grade on the certification exam

I was curious, so I popped on over to Salary.com and typed in “Registered Nurse Anesthetist” in my own zip code for a base salary search. I found that they start out at $131,000 and top out at over $170,000 in my local area.

Then, after giving serious consideration to changing this blog from “Life Under the Lights” of Fire Trucks and Ambulances to “Life Under the Lights” of an Operating Room, I decided to point something else out about the differences and similarities of a Paramedic and a CRNA.

 “The didactic curricula of nurse anesthesia programs are governed by COA standards and provide students the scientific, clinical, and professional foundation upon which to build sound and safe clinical practice. The basic nurse anesthesia academic curriculum and prerequisite courses focus on coursework in anesthesia practice: pharmacology of anesthetic agents and adjuvant drugs including concepts in chemistry and biochemistry (105 contact hours); anatomy, physiology, and pathophysiology (135 contact hours); professional aspects of nurse anesthesia practice (45 contact hours); basic and advanced principles (sic) of anesthesia practice including physics, equipment, technology (sic)  and pain management (105 contact hours); research (30 contact hours); and clinical correlation conferences (45 contact hours).

Most programs exceed these minimum requirements. In addition, many require study in methods of scientific inquiry and statistics, as well as active participation in student-generated and faculty-sponsored research.

Clinical residencies afford supervised experiences for students during which time they are able to learn anesthesia techniques, test theory, and apply knowledge to clinical problems. Students gain experience with patients of all ages who require medical, surgical, obstetrical, dental, and pediatric interventions. The results of a 1998 survey of program directors show that nurse anesthesia programs provide an average of 1,595 hours of clinical experience for each student.”

(Again, from http://www.AANA.com – the emphasis is mine)

Remember that the CRNA’s have a Bachelor’s Degree and a RN license prior to beginning their training. This is different from the Paramedic curriculum. We have hour requirements as well:

“The emphasis of paramedic education should be competence of the graduate, not the amount of education that they receive. The time involved in educating a paramedic to an acceptable level of competence depends on many variables. Based on the experience in the pilot and field testing of this curriculum, it is expected that the average program, with average students, will achieve average results in approximately 1000-1200 hours of instruction. The length of this course will vary according to a number of factors, including, but not limited to:

-student’s basic academic skills competence

-faculty to student ratio

-student motivation

-the student’s prior emergency/health care experience

-prior academic achievements

-clinical and academic resources available

-quality of the overall educational program”

 (Source: Http://www.EMS.gov – Thanks to Chris Webster, Sam Bradley, Greg Friese and Kevin Reiter)

Not that the above is related to the article I read, I mean it’s saying that people with a BS degree in something, a medical license, and what amounts to a little more than an EMT-B class plus an EMT-P class from an accredited school make an average of $150k… but I digress.

Back to the article, Dr Rein has this to say about CRNAs:

“It is interesting to note that the United States is the only westernized country in the world that allows nurses to administer anesthesia unsupervised. Countries such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Japan and Israel, just to name a few, have no nurses administering anesthesia. In some European countries there are a few nurse anesthetists who work under the strict supervision of a physician.”

He continues and says this:

“So what’s up with us? Well, it seems that the American Association of Nurse Anesthetists have convinced our government in Washington that unsupervised nurses are just as safe as a physician. They point to the fact that there are no comparative studies to show they are not. The reason there are no studies is that it would be unethical to perform such a study in which some people get a physician and some do not. Can you imagine a patient agreeing to participate in such a study?”

Can you imagine indeed?

Dr Rein is right when he says in the letter that Anesthesia is a Medical profession and is a specialty of physicians for a reason. When he says “Just because we have made it safe is no reason to take it for granted”, he’s right as well. Anesthesia is dangerous for the untrained and inexperienced provider and it is a specialty not to be taken lightly. However, where’s the line? Is this an attempt by the”Virginia Anesthesia and Peroperative Care Specialists” to fire a shot at the “American Association of Nurse Anesthetists?” Are Doctor Anesthesiologists afraid of losing jobs to the nurses? Where is the line where patient safety is best maintained while being most cost-effective and efficient?

If this doesn’t provide incentive to you to think about requiring a degree for Paramedics, I don’t quite know what will. I’m not doing this job for the money and neither are you, but does that make us any more or less moral than a CRNA who “Isn’t doing his/her job for the money” either, but still makes a ton more of it than any paramedic I know?

You could change the names of the players in this argument, fiddle just a bit with some of the details, and change this into one of a thousand other feuds going on under the healthcare umbrella. This is the same story that paramedics face when we’re trying to get new skills, new techniques, more money, and more responsibility. While I’m not taking a stand on the CRNA/MD issue because it’s not my specialty, I’m offering up this debate as a study in professional growth and conflict between two of the myriad of medical camps out there. As we push EMS forward, grow as a profession, and promote the EMS 2.0 agenda, learning from things like this will be of value to us all.

————————————————–

Thanks to the following for their contributions:

EMS case law? AMA Refusals, Death, and Documentation

18 comments

Our friend Valerie DeFrance, who runs the EMS House of Defrance from way up in the Vast Frozen Wasteland facebooked this article this morning and you need to read it.

http://www.leagle.com/unsecure/page.htm?shortname=inmoco20100921246

Yep, check that URL. It’s from a site that specializes in putting out snippets of case law and this one’s simply all-too-common.

You should read the article, or at least skim through the salient points, because this affects you personally. You as an EMS provider should know about this. Pay attention to this case and what it means to you.

In this case, a Paramedic/EMT-B ambulance responded to a person experiencing Chest Pain and Difficulty Breathing. This is a quote from the article: (The emphasis is mine)

The unit arrived at decedent’s home and Respondents performed a primary survey of the decedent ten minutes after the initial call was placed. Respondents followed up on their primary survey with a secondary survey a minute later. They then obtained a set of vital signs. Based on their examination, Respondents diagnosed decedent with acid reflux and recommended a treatment of over-the-counter Maalox/Gaviscon. Believing decedent was in no immediate medical danger, Respondents left the home fifteen minutes after arriving.

The next morning at approximately 10:30 a.m. decedent again called 9-1-1, still complaining of difficulty breathing and chest pains. An ambulance unit from Community Fire Protection District was again dispatched to decedent’s home arriving five minutes later. This unit was manned by a different two-person team than had responded the night before. After finding the decedent was experiencing pain across the chest and into the back, shortness of breath, diaphoresis and nausea, the team began administering emergency treatment with oxygen, aspirin and EKG. At 10:55 a.m. the team initiated emergency transport of decedent to DePaul Health Center where he was admitted ten minutes later. At the Health Center decedent was diagnosed with cardiac arrest and pulmonary embolism and began receiving treatment. The treatment was unsuccessful and decedent died at 4:00 p.m. on 11 July 2008.

So do you see a problem there?

First off, I’m assuming they obtained an AMA refusal form (and if they didn’t, they’re idiots). This case highlights exactly what I’ve always said about refusals being worthless. There’s no mention of the patient having refused transport here. In fact, this isn’t a case on whether or not the EMTs actions were correct or incorrect. This is simply a case to see whether or not they have protection under the doctrine of Sovereign Immunity. It looks to me like they were basing their defense on whether or not they have that legal protection, not basing it on their thought that they provided proper care. It looks like they were assumed not to have provided it. In this case, a signed refusal meant nothing. If they were successfully sued with no mention of the AMA form, what good is it?

Second off, it’s in the official record that their PRIMARY survey took less than a minute… and I can believe that if they were solely attempting to rule out an immediate life threat. That’s what the primary survey is for. As evidenced by the fact that the deceased lasted another ten hours, I can assume that there was no immediate threat to his life. However, they then did a “secondary survey” one minute later and cleared the scene with what I assume to be an AMA refusal in just fifteen minutes. So if we time this out, they made it to the patient’s side in one minute, did two assessments, obtained a refusal, and cleared the scene in 15 minutes? That’s one minute to grab gear and walk to the patient, a minute to rule out immediate life threats, a few minutes to do a secondary assessment and vitals, with no mention of an EKG, and a few minutes to carry whatever gear they took in back to the truck, get back in the truck, and clear? Um… Either these are the fastest medics in the West, or they did a very poor assessment.

And the guy died. And they got sued. And they lost. And they freaking deserved to lose.

The second crew seems to have provided proper care for the patient, and that is evidenced in the case outcome. In fact, the lawyers and the judge seem to have made it a point to show the poor care provided by the first crew in contrast to the proper care provided by the second crew. It’s clearly evident here and I’ll bet that if we were to go to that agency and inspect it, we could probably see the difference in dedication and motivation between the first and second crew. The first paramedic comes off as lazy, callous, and stupid whereas the second paramedic comes off as competent and caring. I’d be willing to bet that this is honestly the case. That the first medic was a “good enough” medic who often encouraged AMA refusals and performed just to the bare minimum and the second medic was somewhat better than the first.

So how, as EMS providers, how do we protect against the precedent set by this case law?

The answer is still now as it always has been, do a thorough assessment every time, kick the decisions up to the physician, and document, document, document. This case was in 2008 and if you were doing EMS back then, you know that a 12-lead EKG was the standard of care. This patient should have had a working diagnosis (Chest pain), attempts at making a differential diagnosis (lung sounds, History and Physical Exam, EKG, SpO2, and trended vital signs and 12-leads) and should have been transported. If the patient wanted to refuse, the physician medical control should have been contacted and this should have been documented. The time limit of 14 minutes of assessment and/or care in this case is evidence that this didn’t happen. The medics blew his call for help off and the patient died.

Here’s what I would have done: I would have performed a thorough patient assessment including lung sounds, ABD assessment, and a history. I would have gotten the OPQRST of the patient’s complaint, and performed serial 12-lead EKGs. Then I would have transported. If the patient refused, I would have transmitted the 12-lead EKG, spoken with a physician about the case, and attempted to have the physician speak with the patient. This all would have been thoroughly documented.

Patients have the right to refuse care if they are conscious, alert, and oriented. They have this right even if they’re being stupid. We have the responsibility to help them make a proper, rational decision and to show that we made every effort to provide them with the best possible information. Proper patient care and excellent documentation are the way we protect against these types of lawsuits… and that really hasn’t changed.

This kind of situation can and does happen. Protect yourself and your agency by never becoming lazy. Document! Document! Document! Do your best every time. Be thorough and don’t succumb to mediocrity just because it’s easy. It will catch up to you just like it did to these two.

————————————————————

For more tips on EMS documentation:

What Difference Does EMS Make? Choose Your Own Ending

17 comments

John didn’t need his alarm clock this morning. In fact, he was wide awake just a few minutes before it went off. He turned it off so as to not wake up his wife and got up quietly to start the day. Today was going to be great. It was huge. Months of work at the office were finally going to be recognized today in the biggest project meeting he’d had in a year. Today’s meeting would launch his career faster than almost anything he’d done before. He was excited. He was ready.

John showered, shaved, and got dressed up in his new suit that he’d bought the day before. He wanted to look his best for this meeting. Everything was counting on it. His wife Joanne had coffee and a quick breakfast ready for him when he came down the stairs. He sipped on his coffee for a bit as he ate his breakfast. It was really sweet of her to do that, He thought and he told her so with an extra hug and kiss as he left for his commute. He wanted to be to work early today to make sure that he was there to answer any pre-meeting questions. This was the day.

Traffic was light on the interstate that morning and John was moving at a good clip. It was strange, he thought, for traffic to be this kind to him on a Monday morning but he figured it was a good omen. His phone buzzed with an e-mail and he glanced at it. It wasn’t anything that couldn’t wait until he was in the office, he thought. Then a great song came on the radio. John reached down to turn up the volume so he could get pumped up for the drive…

He never saw the cars stopped just in front of him.

Mary took care of herself pretty well for a type one diabetic. Her doctor had told her that. She stuck to her diet, maintained her sugar levels meticulously, and took her insulin on a sliding scale that seemed to be working perfectly. Her blood sugar readings were always right where her doctor said they should be. Mary was proud of that. She worked out and tried to get out walking or jogging the trail at the park at least 3 or 4 times a week. She felt good, looked good, and thought that she was doing all she could to take charge of her health.

It was a beautiful Saturday morning and Mary thought that she should take her dog Patches out for a walk around the pond. Patches was a 1 year old Golden Retriever and loved jumping in the lake to fetch sticks. Mary had taken her morning dose of insulin, popped a multivitamin tablet from her new bottle that she’d bought the day before, and ate a quick bit of breakfast before she put Patches on his leash and started walking to the park. It was about five blocks away and patches knew the route well. Everything was great, until the nausea hit… Mary tried to fight it but knew that she was going to throw up when she started salivating and breathing heavily. She ended up throwing up in some bushes next to the sidewalk. She thought that she was lucky. Nobody saw her hurl up her breakfast and she immediately felt better. It must have just been the new vitamins that made her stomach upset, she thought as she continued walking to the park. She figured that she just wouldn’t take them again.

Mary never felt sick. She just thought that she should take a nap. The rock over there looked like a good place. Why was she so sleepy? Never mind… Just lay down and nap. Nap good.

Luckily, another jogger happened by to find Mary unresponsive.

Work had been scarce lately and Steve was happy to get his truck back on the road. He drove a live-bottom trailer hauling asphalt for a big local paving company and they hadn’t had many big projects come their way lately. Driveway work was steady, but rarely did the company need Steve to drive a big truck out to a site for a driveway job. Steve made his best money and hours when the company had highway work and today was the first day of a big job they’d just gotten. He’d been in line with the other trucks waiting his turn to dump his load into the paver for hours and even though he was happy to be working, he had to pee. Minutes turned into hours and finally it was his turn to drop his blacktop and head back for a new load. He couldn’t wait to be done. He really had to pee by this time and he knew exactly where his next opportunity would be. He backed his trailer up to the paver and raised the bed. Then through his rear-view mirror he saw the people scramble and jump off of the paver. He felt his truck lurch forward as the paver machine was pushed into it from the impact of a car travelling too fast in the construction zone. When he jumped out of his truck after looking to make sure there was nobody coming at him, he saw his friend Luke laying on the ground. Luke was bleeding, bad. The car and the paver were a tangled mess of metal and there was someone screaming at an unmoving figure in the passenger seat of the car.

Steve no longer had to pee…

—————————————————————————

Note to blog readers:     I can’t quite decide on what I should do from this point on. I can take two paths, one is a rallying call to community members asking them to put themselves in the place of the people in the above cases and get out there and support their local EMS. The other, is a rallying call to us EMS people… I’ve written it both ways. You can see what you like best.

—————————————————————————

Option #1

Every day, Paramedics and EMTs put on their uniforms, fire up their ambulances, and get ready to face the onslaught of whatever mayhem the streets produce for them during their shift. They do a job that is unpredictable, complicated, and vital to the community. These three stories could happen to you or someone you love tomorrow and each of them will require the response of a highly trained, expert Emergency Medical Services (EMS) provider. There are times when your local ambulance service makes the difference between life and death but there are far more times when they make a big difference in a person’s continuing quality of life. By interceding in the first few moments of a medical emergency with highly trained experts, EMS makes a difference for us all. Communities that support their local Emergency Medical Services have better services and community members that are more educated about what makes quality EMS are better suited to support their local services.

You may not think about the people who respond to your call when you dial 911, but all we do is think about you. Get informed, get involved, and support your local Emergency Medical Services.

We’re there for you. We need you to return the favor.

—————————————————————————

Option #2

As you come in to work today, lace up your boots, or turn on your pager, think about the patients in the above cases. They’re people just like anyone you see in your day to day life. They and others like them didn’t intend to be placed in the situations they’re facing and to them; theirs is one of the most intense situations of their life. Their very life and the continuing quality of their lives could rest in your hands today. They are depending on you. Their families are depending on you. Your knowledge, skill, and preparation to perform your best are paramount to these people. Their care rests on you. You owe them your best and there is no excuse they’ll accept for poor performance.

EMS providers transcend their self when they lace up their boots and sign on for duty. Society needs us. Our patients need us. We need us. We will never know the impact we’ll have on the lives of our patients, their families, and their communities… but it’s huge. We as EMS providers play a pivotal role in our communities. They’ll never acknowledge it en masse… but that doesn’t diminish its importance. Recognition for our skills isn’t necessary for our skills to be vital. EMS people do their jobs because they’re important. We do our jobs because our guts tell us that what we’re doing is right… and even when we stumble and find ways to improve ourselves and our care, it doesn’t diminish the importance of what we’ve done. We have acted, and we continue to act in the best interest of humanity.

Today you can make a choice. You can make the choice to seek out and become the best EMS provider you can be or you can choose not to. I suggest that you make the right choice but no one will ever be able to force you. Your care is an art and a science. Your performance is based upon hard science and soft intuition. There can never be a book that will tell you exactly what is right for every situation… you simply have to learn it and learn how to make the right decisions to fit the situations you find yourself in.

My advice to all EMS providers is to take the high road. Err on the side of what you truly feel is best for your patient. Do your best. Study hard and learn from those you consider the best among us. As an EMS provider, you bear the burden of an overloaded system that pays poorly and garners little respect. I feel it too. I say that it doesn’t diminish the importance of what we do and it isn’t the individual patient’s fault. They deserve our best no matter what the system is doing to us. It’s our responsibility and our calling. It has been said that the definition of a “Professional” is one who can perform their duty adequately in conditions that would cause the amateur to turn back. I’d say that we’re living in those conditions today, but we still have to perform. Do your best and know your stuff. Lives depend on your commitment.

It is our job to promote ourselves. It is our job to elevate EMS. It is our job to speak out and optimize the system. The fault for its failings lies within our profession and it is our job to change it. All of us, individually and collectively have the responsibility.

Will you answer?

—————————————————————————

So I got a little philosophical in this one. Which ending do you like better?

Too Much Information For a Paramedic?

19 comments

 

This is a coordinated post by our friends Greg Friese and Steve Whitehead.

 - Greg’s post on this topic can be found at: http://www.everydayemstips.com/?p=3628

 - Steve’s post on this topic can be found at: http://theemtspot.com/2010/08/25/too-much-information/

 ————————————————————————-

“They Don’t Know What They Don’t Know”

It’s an established fact that 60% of fatalities within confined spaces are would-be rescuers. They see someone down in a confined space, enter the space, and are overcome by the conditions that took down the initial victim. The process sometimes repeats itself, with multiple would-be rescuers entering the space and falling victim themselves. It’s tragic really, but the cold, hard fact is that these people are victims of their own ignorance. They don’t know what they don’t know. They don’t know that there is a fatal set of conditions within the space, and they don’t know that whatever it is that killed the first victim, or subsequent victims, will kill them as well. It’s a well documented phenomenon that plays on the compassion of the would-be rescuers and ends up getting them killed.

They simply don’t know what they don’t know.

Hey Guys?? Guys?

So when I was approached by our friend Greg Friese from www.EveryDayEMStips.com the other day regarding a comment he received on one of his training articles, I was interested in doing a co-post with him. He also has contacted our friend Steve Whitehead from www.TheEMTspot.com and together we’re tri-posting on this issue. Their links will follow below and are just great as always.

The comment that followed this online training article was written presumably by a paramedic. It was a critique of the article that simply stated “too much information for a paramedic”. I read that, and immediately thought of confined space incidents, where ignorance can get a person killed. Lots of situations fit that scenario and it’s not always the rescuers who get killed. EMS providers who “don’t know what they don’t know” can and do kill patients. More often, they don’t provide the best possible care.

There’s this thing that we have made it our business to know how to repair. It’s called the “Human Body” and if you’re reading this article, the chances are good that you possess one. The human body is VASTLY complex. It’s the most complex machine we humans know about and we are still learning about it to this day. There are some amazingly smart people out there who have dedicated their lives to studying these meat machines that our brains pilot around and they still haven’t figured everything out yet. We can help set it back on course to heal itself in a lot of cases but we can’t construct a new one. We don’t know about all the minutia, the microscopic works inside of it that make it do all of the amazing things that it does. The levels of systems within systems that function seamlessly within still other systems are numerous and fascinating. I learn something new about it all the time, and still there are people who know vast amounts more about the inner workings of it and about the huge number of things that can affect it’s operating effectiveness than I do. The human body is remarkably complex yet elegant and perfect in its design.

C'mon... Don't be a wuss.

And we who call ourselves “medical professionals” are well advised to study every possible aspect of it. Consider it your “life’s work”. If your job is to fix and support the end users of the human body, you darn well better know everything you can about it.

“But”, you say, “There are people out there who are supposed to know much more about the human body than we are. They’re called Physicians, and they get paid a whole lot more than we do. We’re just paramedics. (or EMTs).” And you’d be right for saying that, of course. Physicians have the ultimate responsibility for knowing the human body. It’s their life’s work as well. Their patients live and die based upon their knowledge, skills, and talents they have for examining the human body and being able to figure out what’s going on. Their whole practice is based upon their knowledge, skill, and talent. The more they know when they’re working there, the better provider they are.

It’s that simple, and it’s exactly the same for us EMS people. The more we know, the better we are. Nobody is better served by dumbing us down. Nothing is gained by denying yourself knowledge. Not a single patient is better served by you not knowing everything you can know about what is going wrong with them and it’s your duty to learn as much as you can about what you’re supposed to know about.

What is the line for how much paramedics “need to know?” Is everything that we need to know covered by our initial training course? Is that everything we need to get out there in the world and start slinging IVs and Meds all willy nilly?

I look at the paramedic license as a “learner’s permit”. It’s the baseline knowledge level needed to function at that level under supervision. It’s a jumping off point from which the provider should immerse themselves in knowledge. I can certainly say that I’ve learned volumes past my initial certification and that the “extra” knowledge has saved lives. Did you know that Fentanyl can cause chest muscle tetany when administered too rapidly? Or how about that lasix, when pushed too rapidly can cause hearing loss?  Do you know that ST depression in the high V leads can signify a posterior MI? What about differentiating an acetabulum fracture from a “pulled groin”? Can you reliably predict the patients whose blood pressure is going to crash after Nitroglycerine administration by reading a 12-lead EKG? What about the clinical presentation of a non-ST elevation MI? Do you know the MEND stroke screen? What about the different neurological exams to find an intracranial bleed?

Etcetera, etcetera… The point is, there isn’t a cut off. The final exam we take for our licensures prepares us with the baseline knowledge to get out there and learn what it takes to make us truly great EMS providers. The true professional will learn this, and constantly seek the knowledge he or she needs. The average to sub-average provider will comment that they “don’t need to know” something.

Get out there, get fascinated, and learn as much as you can. It will never be enough knowledge… but your mind is a sponge for a reason.

Study Hard. Know Your Stuff. No Excuses.

————————————————

This is a coordinated post by our friends Greg Friese and Steve Whitehead. Be sure to read their posts on this

Greg’s post on this topic can be found at: http://www.everydayemstips.com/?p=3628

Steve’s post on this topic can be found at: http://theemtspot.com/2010/08/25/too-much-information/

Automatic Window Roller Uppers and Other “Great” Ideas

12 comments

A few years back I had the chance to drive a 1997 Saturn 5-speed coupe for a while. It was a pretty nice car and I drove it back and forth on my tri-weekly 2 hour commute from the Quad Cities of IL to the Chicago Suburbs for my 24hr ambulance shift. It actually worked out well because the pay for paramedics was so much higher in the Chicago area than it was where I lived. I’d go up, do a 24 or a 48 hour shift, and have plenty of time to work my other jobs back home.  I didn’t really mind the drive but I’d save so much money by driving the Saturn instead of my full-size truck that I’d drive it whenever the ex-gf would let me.

One thing about driving the highways around Chicago is the incessant amount of toll-booths that one must cross while driving there. There are literally more toll-booths than I can count and every one of them requires a person to get out of traffic, stop, and pay the toll. It’s annoying in a car with an automatic transmission and even more annoying with a manual transmission. It aggravates me to say the least.

One of the features of the 97 Saturn SL 2 Coupe is an automatic window roller downer (is there a better name for that?) where the window will roll all the way down with just one click of the button. It was actually pretty handy for going through a toll-booth in a car with a manual transmission. I could click the button, then focus on downshifting for the quickest stop possible. This feature is common on cars nowadays, but back in the primitive turn-of-the-century it was my first Automatic Window Roller Downer Feature and I thought it was pretty cool… Except for one problem:

The window only went down automatically, It wouldn’t roll back up with only one click and had to be *manually* automatically rolled back up again. Yes, by this I mean I actually had to use one whole finger to hold the button. It was kind of a minor annoyance when I had to reaccelerate while shifting the manual transmission. Back then I didn’t think it was a huge annoyance, mind you… but I thought that the simple addition of an automatic roller back upper feature would have been much better. I could just imagine that the simple change would make it more useful and I was a tad angry about the shortsightedness of the engineers. I mean, why couldn’t they have thought of this when it seemed so obvious to my 20yo self? If I had thought of it had to be a good idea, right?

Well then some years later, I rented a car that actually had both an automatic roller downer feature *and* an automatic roller upper feature. I was so happy to find that! It was SO COOL! Finally the engineers had listened to my private thoughts that I never shared with anyone and put in my feature! I was happy.

Then I tried it for a while… and it sucked.

Yea, having a “one click” roller upper feature means never just cracking the window open a bit. One click may bring the window down a touch, but the auto feature keeps it rolling down all the way. In the previous design, without the automatic roller upper, this could be stopped by one quick click in the other direction. However, with the automatic roller upper feature, the window just rolls back all the way up! Getting the window open just a little bit is nearly impossible. Then I thought that if a kid or a less-than-intelligent adult chanced to stick their head through the open window and the button got depressed, the window could roll all the way up and choke them. The automatic window roller upper feature is annoying as heck and wasn’t the great idea that I thought it would be. It was an idea that I didn’t think all the way though. I thought I was smart and well, I wasn’t. It’s probably a good idea that I didn’t get all fired up and start a national letter writing campaign to lobby the car companies to put in automatic window roller upper features (Which I would have urged them to rename to “Chris’s Awesome Mega RoLL uPPahhz”) because then I would have looked like an idiot to more people than just myself. It’s the reason why I rarely orchestrate nationwide letter writing campaigns: experience. 

This got me thinking about all of the ideas that I’ve had about things in EMS and in other aspects of my career that I didn’t think wholly through. Steve Whitehead, the genius behind http://www.TheEMTspot.com wrote an article recently that spoke of the fatal flaws in the heroes of Greek Tragedy that I really liked. You can find the article here 8 Tragic EMS Behavior Flaws to Avoid” (I’ll link it at the end too, because you really should read it) but here’s what struck me so blatantly in the article:

The Critic – “This is all so stupid”

This is perhaps the easiest of all the hero flaws to slip into and the toughest to shake. The critic is convinced that the world desperately needs his or her opinions on the way things ought to be.  They figure out that offering opinions is so much more fun and rewarding than working to solve a problem and then it becomes like a drug. Soon they’re framing everything they see with the question, “How should this be done better?” and then offering their sage analysis. Usually with a poor understanding of why the thing is the way it is in the first place.

The problem with the critic is that they genuinely believe that the world wants to hear their endless assessments and when an army of engineers doesn’t show up to start doing the hard work of implementing all their great ideas, they get frustrated. The second problem is that they jump to analysis without seeking to ever understand the nature of the problem. Research and implementation are hard, but critical evaluation is fun and easy. As long as they don’t build anything real, they never have to worry about the next critic showing up, spending a few minutes looking at what they built and offering up their sage criticism.

This is the part of Steve’s article that really got me thinking. Have I been “The Critic” too often in my career? I mean, I don’t try to do this… but I find faults in a lot of aspects of contemporary EMS. I look at things and try to find ways to make them better. If you’re a regular reader, in-fact, that’s probably why you come to read what I have to say as often as you do. New ideas are great.

However, as my Automatic Window Roller Upper debacle (that yes, wholly occurred only within the boundaries of my own cranial cavity) has shown, some ideas that come to me and seem so obvious can also be bad ideas. My experience has proven to me time and time again that I need to think things through. I try, but EMS doesn’t always allow us the time to consider all options, let alone every aspect of every option. The Law of Unintended Consequences abounds and rears its ugly head quite often.

As the years have drug on, I’ve been trying to analyze my “Great” ideas more fully, but one person rarely has the ability to completely devise the correct answer to every problem. Two heads are better than one a lot of the time and systems have a way of developing themselves.

So as we go forth to change this thing we call EMS and usher in the new world of EMS 2.0, let’s remember to consider as many reasoned opinions as we can. We need your input and we need your participation. The more we grow together, the better our ideas become.

Oh, and here’s that link to Steve’s Article again: “8 Tragic EMS Behavior Flaws to Avoid”

Four Words: EMS, Apathy, Disgrace, Massachusetts.

12 comments

By now you’ve all heard of the flap that is happening in Mass. regarding the 200 or so EMTs and Paramedics that had their licenses suspended or revoked for running a non-existent training program or for falsely representing that they attended non-existent training classes. If you haven’t heard about it by now, you’re probably not following EMS news as much as you should.

Here is one of the articles on the subject from JEMS.com

The issue has been discussed quite a bit around the EMS blogosphere. Some big name bloggers have written on it, and I even discussed it a little bit on the EMS Educast the other day.

Here’s TOTWTYTR’s take on this: I’m Not Very Sympathetic

And here’s Rogue Medic’s take on it: (this is a part-2 that reiterates the first)

Here’s the episode of the EMS Educast where we discussed the issue briefly

Other than for speaking about the issue briefly, I’ve been avoiding writing on it. My job is usually to report positive things that are happening in the EMS world and this is definitely not a positive thing. In fact, it’s a disgrace to us all. Rogue Medic has it right when he asks the question “Why do we Encourage such apathy in EMS?”

And that’s what this is. It’s not just that it’s apathy for the boring destruction of brain cells that we call “Continuing Education” in most areas of EMS, it’s the apathy for the whole process. The apathy where we as a profession have let the standards get to this point.

I mean, really. How many of you feel that the continuing education you receive is anything more than something you have to do in order to keep your license up? How many of you feel that your regularly scheduled, mandatory, continuing education classes are of any quality? How many of you feel like they’re actually doing anything good for you?

And that’s the system in which we function. TOTWTYTR made the statement that he sits through boring traning classes all the time because those are the hoops he has to jump through in order to maintain his licensure. I do too, of course. I sit through probably as many or even more classes than anyone reading this article because I am a practicing paramedic with National Registry and licensure in three states. Sometimes the training from one state carries over into the next, and sometimes it doesn’t. At any rate, I get to listen to unmotivated speakers read flat material whilst sitting in an uncomfortable chair on a very regular basis. We all do.

However, I feel that I keep up my continuing education quite well on my own through other means such as extensive self study and non-credit medical education. Keeping my professional skills sharp is very important for me because not only am I proud of my professional skills, but I am well aware of the fact that the quality of my skills translates into the quality of life for my patients. If I keep myself sharp, I’m a better paramedic. If I let them get dull, well then I’m an apathetic paramedic who isn’t doing my duty. Duty is important to me. So are things like Pride, Professionalism, and Honor. In fact, those three words are more than just the slogan for my blog, they are how I think that I and other EMS professionals should live their lives and careers.

Others have been quick to demonize the 200 suspended EMTs. Others have been quick to defend them. The ones defending them have said that these people are apt to lose their incomes, their livelihoods, and that the punishment is unfair. Well, for that part I disagree. The punishment is indeed fair. You could have killed someone by being untrained oafs with lackluster skills. You never proved you were otherwise. However, if you were to ask me if I thought that a state EMS agency – ANY state EMS agency – was competent to manage such a program, I would laugh at you.  Every state has made an attempt to regulate continuing education and I agree that there is a good reason for them to do so. I would also agree that the prospect of regulating a group of EMS people in their continuing education efforts is a daunting task. I would say that the perfect system has yet to be developed and that a good number of the 200 were simply “playing the game” and thought that since their states EMS continuing educational system was a joke that they could make a joke out of it as well.

Here’s the most biting apathy of all to me. If you believe that a system that you work under is a joke. If you believe that there is a better way to do something. If you believe that what you’re made to do is pointless and obsolete… then why the heck haven’t you done anything about it?

I’d like you to look at this issue from this perspective, folks. Sure, not everyone in that group of 200 were caring, competent professionals. I’m sure some of them were jackasses. (And yes, I said “Jackasses). However, I’m also sure that there is a percentage of them in that group that sincerely care about being the best they can be in EMS and they simply got caught up in the mob mentality. I’m sure that some of them had just given up. I’m sure some of them were good people who just became apathetic.

I hate apathy.

If what, say 50% of that group were of the caring kind, that leaves 100 people who thought that the system was broken. Did it not occur to any of those 100 people to try and change it? Did they not try and band together to improve the system? Could one person do it? Could 100 people do it?

If we are to be regulated and controlled by obsolete and ineffective bureaucratic systems, then it is our duty to rise up and change things. Sure, that sounds melodramatic… but how many times have you thought that your state regulations were stupid. One of the defining aspects of a Profession is Self-Regulation. Look at your states “Bar Association” for Lawyers, or the states “Medical Association” for physicians.

Is there any state out there that has a “Paramedic’s Association” that has any teeth to it?

No continuing education system or relicensure processes is even close to perfect. That’s because of a few reasons, not the least of which is because the government is the one running it. The other reason could be because it isn’t being policed by the paramedics who care about it the most.

I’ve said it before, I’ll say it again. It’s time for us to take ownership of our profession. Stand up and make this the profession it deserves to be. Stamp out apathy and band together to let your voices be heard. If you don’t start the process of meaningful change, who do you expect to do so?

——————————————————-

For more positive discussion on EMS, check out the comments section in Negativity? You Won’t Find That Here” or for a description of two real-world moral and ethical dilemmas in EMS, check out Two Cases, one letter. From one paramedic’s struggles, change can come”

Paramedics and EMTs are Special, a salute to the Spork!

11 comments
Ah, the humble Spork. At once it is an example of utility and futility. It is well suited to nothing but bridging the gap between the usefulness of its parent utensils and the burden of having to provide a separate spoon and fork. Sporks are great for when you need to have an eating utensil that is suited to a variety of food consumption scenarios but do not have the space nor the gumption to provide separate utensils. Sporks can perform lots of tasks but they do nothing very well. While I love the concept and the fact that the name is *really* fun to say (Spork? Spork… Spork!!), eating anything with a spork is a challenge. I mean, have you ever tried to eat soup with a spork? You’ll end up wearing a percentage of it. Heaven forbid that you have to use it to hold something you have to cut with a knife like a piece of meat. It’s nearly impossible. I suppose that eating salad with a spork would be fairly manageable but not if you have a lot of non-lettucy stuff in the salad like cherry tomatoes, mushrooms, and/or pepperoni. Honestly, who wants a salad that is comprised only of rabbit food? 

Die hard Sporksters, that's who

However, I digress. What I’m trying to say is that the spork, the half-breed malformation of a spoon and a fork, has its place as a substitute for either when it is not economical to provide both. Like its lesser known brother the “knork”, it is a natural idea and a somewhat cool concept. However, there is a very clear reason that the spoon and the fork are separate utensils. There are specific purposes for the design of the spoon and the fork and good reason to have separate tools that are suited to the kind of tasks that they’re used for. The spork is the watered down version of both. It can somewhat perform the tasks of its parents, but not well. It is the “Jack of all trades, Master of none” if you will.

And that is why I’m writing about our humble friend the Spork in my usual rotation of EMS topics. A conversation I had on Twitter the other day with my tweeps @pgsilva and @rescue_monkey brought up the spectre of why exactly ambulances aren’t staffed with nurses and physicians’ assistants and are instead staffed with Paramedics and EMTs. PG and The Rescue Monkey thought that the conversation would make that vein pop out of my forehead like it does sometimes when I get enraged. They were mistaken. It doesn’t make me angry. In fact, I informed everyone that I would write a post on what exactly it makes me think about. This is that post.

The “Why don’t nurses and/or (insert title of healthcare provider here) staff ambulances debate” has a clear answer for me. Here it is:

EMS providers are sporks. We’re also not sporks. We exist in the realm of both the specific and the generalized. We are jacks of all trades and the master of the non-specific. EMS providers are generalized in nature and that generalization is specialized into the random nature of the work in which we perform.

Or women with sporks, you know. That too.

Are you confused? Well that’s understandable. Let’s look at it this way. The ultimate healthcare provider has always been the physician. Since the beginning of western medicine, the physician has always been the healer that people have turned to. Physicians are learned professionals who seek to learn and apply knowledge to the human condition in the name of healing. Physicians are “clinicians” in the fact that they make a clinical diagnosis based upon an examination of a patient and then devise a proper treatment path to treat a patient’s diagnosis. They physician assesses a patient, makes a diagnosis of the patient’s condition based upon their knowledge base and ongoing research, and then uses that same knowledge base and research in order to devise the best treatment possible for the patient. It’s the definition of a clinician.

Nurses, and their modern incarnation as the Registered Professional Nurse (RN) developed as the ultimate assistant to the physician. Their goal was to be the caregiver, the person with enough medical knowledge to continue the care plan and treatment that the physician determined with the compassion and the ability to meet the ongoing needs of the patient. While the physician devoted their efforts to learning and education, the nurse required less education and more compassion. Medical technology and knowledge has expanded greatly and has required the nurse to develop a vast array of knowledge and a myriad of specializations, but their basic function has remained the same. They care for patients in the long term during their convalescence from an illness or injury.

Physicians and nurses have worked in concert. They have developed a system where the sick and injured are brought to them so they may take care of them using the resources they gather together. Each of them performs their role with the goal of making people get better. As knowledge of medicine has increased, different types of physicians and nurses have developed into specialties. The general practitioner acts as a gatekeeper to specialties and treats the most common maladies and is assisted by nurses qualified to care for the largest population of patients. Specialists, such as Cardiologists, Oncologists, and Surgeons, have developed to allow patients the benefit of having people treat them who have sought out to become experts in exactly the illness that the patient may have. The nurses have adapted and have become specialized in their own right, with nursing specialties that complement the specialties of the physician.

However, there is a drawback to all of this specialization. When you have a malady that affects your feet, you would benefit being under the care of the podiatrist. However, you wouldn’t get the best care possible if the only physician available were a cardiologist. The same holds true for the oncologist that attempts to treat your pulmonary condition or for the proctologist who treats your sore throat. While the basic concepts are there, the specialization of focus is not. To be sure, while a person who has graduated from medical school may be able to treat pretty much any condition that you may have at a level that is basically adequate, specialists have devoted their time in the quest of knowledge in their specific area at the possible expense of their knowledge of other areas. This is a good thing, and it’s the reason that pretty much every hospital is full of people with vast arrays of knowledge in singular topics. This system wasn’t designed. Like capitalism the system designed itself. It works and works well, most of the time. However when economics dictate a limited number of available specialties, certain conditions may be left out.

Nurses have done much the same. While the basic concepts are the same pretty much across the board, a School Nurse would have trouble transitioning into the operating theatre as much as the Oncology nurse would have trouble transitioning into public health. Both of them can probably change a bedpan, start an IV, pass medication, or lend a caring smile in the same manner but the oncology nurse would be much more well versed in the management of chemotherapy drugs and chronic pain management than a would be a surgical nurse.

This brings us to Paramedics and EMTs. We are a profession born out of necessity and forged in battle. Really. We can thank Napoleon for bringing forth the first example of the “flying ambulance” which was a brigade of horse-drawn ambulances staffed by medically trained soldiers. They appeared on the battlefield during the Napoleonic wars and boasted that “No soldier lay with undressed wounds for more than a quarter of an hour”. Battlefield “Medics” have always been on the forefront of emergency acute care in the field. While some examples of ambulance care available to the civilian population exist, in the US it wasn’t until after the Vietnam War that civilian emergency ambulance service became popular and seen as a need rather than a nice thing to have. While physicians often made house calls where they travelled to the patient to provide care, in the interest of efficiency they began to confine themselves in clinics and hospitals where they could more efficiently care for larger patient volumes. With the publishing of the “EMS White Paper” entitled “Accidental Death and Disability: The Neglected Disease of Modern Society”  in 1966, the attention of the public was focused on the need for an effort to extend care out of the walls of the hospital or clinic. The white paper laid out statistics of trauma, stated the need for injury prevention and education, and stated the need for standardization of emergency medical training. The US. Dept. of Transportation took up the mantle of the new Emergency Medical Services system due to the alarming number of fatalities on the burgeoning highway system and modern EMS was born.

"Stick a Spork in me, I'm done" should be part of your daily speech patterns

The EMT and the Paramedic are the equivalent of sticking a spork in the problem and calling it done. EMTs were cheap to train, cheap to employ, and could be widely distributed out there in the field. At the time, it was the perfect solution. Train people in how to perform in the first few moments of a severe injury or acute illness and give them the ability to safely transport a patient to a hospital where the physicians could work in concert to help heal the patient. The nurses, in their role as the assistants to the physicians, stayed in the walls of the hospital or clinic and developed within their specialties. The system grew and developed as the innovators in the field saw more and more acute treatments that could be performed by these new breed of healthcare providers and as the EMTs and Paramedics proved themselves in service.

EMTs and Paramedics are clinicians in the sense that we evaluate a patient and develop a treatment plan that we follow to help them. Our specialty is in the acute, the treatment of disease in the here and now. If it’s happening to a patient and it is directly threatening their life, chances are that an EMT or Paramedic can intervene in a meaningful way. Our specialty is to stabilize and stop the progression of the acute disease process or chain-of-events in an injury that will eventually lead to death. We plug holes and we do it with a knowledge base taught to us by physicians. Our generalization is across the entire spectrum of possible patients, from field delivery of neonates, to jumping in to help stabilize patients in outpatient surgery centers, to taking care of the elderly in nursing homes. Whether a patient is crushed in an industrial machine, is trapped in a rural car accident, is having a heart attack on a baseball diamond, or whatever happens to a person wherever it happens to them, the Paramedic or EMT is the person most specialized in coming to their aid. We gain knowledge and hone experience not just in the treatment of our patients’ medical conditions, but also in the environmental circumstances in which we find them. We may be generalized sporks when it comes to treating any possible injury or acute illness across any patient population, but we’re highly specialized utensils when it comes to treating emergency conditions anywhere at any time.

"Sporks and Phasers" would be a good name for a Rock Band

No other healthcare provider fits into our role… and that seems to make us a full-fledged utensil in my opinion. We are unclassifiable into any other role yet indispensable for our own.

And we need to get out there and let everybody know just how special that role is. Nobody has developed the breadth of knowledge in our specialty that we have. We have made the spork our own.

And that, folks is my answer to why no other healthcare professional can quite full our role. While as a paramedic I am competent in the basic skills needed to say, work in a endoscopy unit, I would not function there to the level of a person experienced and knowledgeable as an endoscopy nurse. Neither would they be able to manage a traumatic airway upside down in a crushed automobile at night as well as I would. It’s my specialty to do the latter, not the former, even though the basic skills may be the same.

For more on this, g’head and read “Any Random Person” an older post of mine. Then get out there and shine up your sporks.

Should EMS Improvise? And the Recipe for the “Kaiser Cocktail”

29 comments

Here’s the recipe for what I call the “Kaiser Cocktail”:

  1. Look in the patient’s kitchen cupboards until you find a box (or a bag) of some type of granulated sugar, powdered sugar, or brown sugar. (in a pinch, you can use honey or syrup)
  2. Find one of the patient’s own cups or glasses, wash it if you have to.
  3. Dump a bunch of the sugar in the glass.
  4. Look in the patient’s refrigerator until you find some soda pop or some type of sweet juice like orange, apple, or grape juice.
  5. Pour that in the glass with the sugar.
  6. Mix it up really well with some type of stirring device. Don’t use your pen or your finger. (Your partner’s pen or finger is ok though.) (Not really.)
  7. Serve warm, chilled, or tepid. Garnish with a peanut butter and jelly sandwich.

Have you guessed what the “Kaiser Cocktail is used for? If you’re in EMS I’m pretty sure you may have figured it out. It’s for sweetening up your local mild hypoglycemic… and no, it’s definitely not for serving to my son right before I drop him off with the in-laws for revenge purposes. The Kaiser Cocktail is for those patients who have blood glucose levels in the mid double digits but that still have the mental faculties necessary for drinking fluids and for protecting their airway while they do it. It’s a home remedy of sorts and it isn’t exactly the kind of thing that they teach you in EMT school. It works like a charm every time and I’ve never seen it not be well tolerated by the patients I’ve used it on or by the families that watch me do it. In fact, the families always seem more than willing to help whip one right up when I ask them to do so.

Picture this scenario: Your ambulance is dispatched to the “Known Diabetic with Altered Mental Status” at an address a short 8 minutes away. You respond to a well kept address in a nice neighborhood and are directed into the residence by a twenty-something female who tells you that her grandfather “Just isn’t acting right and won’t get out of bed”. Seeing no obvious hazards, you enter the residence with the granddaughter and follow her to the back bedroom of the residence to find a 60-something male patient sitting on the bed. He acknowledges you when you introduce yourself and you can see that he’s trying to talk but that he cannot seem to form the words. You say to him “Howdy! How are you feeling??” He answers: “Um… hello…” with a normal voice quality. His airway is patent, his skin is pink, warm, and sweaty, and he doesn’t appear to have any hemispheric neurological deficit. His pulse is bounding and regular at the radial and his respirations are normal. The granddaughter tells you that the patient is diabetic and that he takes insulin.

Got the case diagnosed yet? I’d bet you do. The next thing I would do with this patient is to take a quick finger stick glucose check. For the above fictional scenario, the reading would be 40mg/dl (which is um… “something’ MMOL for you British folk). It’s mild hypoglycemia. I ruled out a possible stroke (CVA/TIA) with the Cincinnati Pre-Hospital Stroke Scale and he patient’s cardiac function seems very normal with his bounding, regular pulse rate. The diaphoresis (sweating) and skin color are differential signs of hypoglycemia, and the patient’s past medical history helps clinch the field diagnosis. This patient’s blood glucose level dropped too low for his brain to function normally and he needs more sugar coursing through his veins in order to feed his brain.

You may be wondering why I brought forth such a common, run-of-the-mill patient presentation on the blog today. As pre-hospital providers, we have a few options available for us that could be considered proper care for this patient. Most EMTs have oral glucose paste at their disposal and a growing number of EMT-Basics carry Glucagon for IM injection. EMT-Intermediates and Paramedics usually have both of the previous medications available and almost all of them carry D-50, or 50% Dextrose solution in water, for IV administration. All of these treatments could be considered for this patient; however I would pull out my namesake concoction in this case. Call it experience, but starting an IV and giving D-50 seems like it would be risky overkill for this patient and an IM injection of glucagon saps the patient’s natural reserves of glycogen for quite a while after administration. Patients seem to hate the taste of oral glucose paste (Lemon?? Really??) and one tube never sees to do the trick. We only care two of them anyway.

That’s why I use a Kaiser Cocktail with these patients. As long as the patient can maintain their own airway and there’s not an aspiration risk, I can’t think of any contraindications once you rule out a possible stroke. It’s cheap, easy, and it has worked like a charm for me every time I’ve tried it. I like using it too, as it feels like a “Mr. Wizard” type home remedy that always fascinates the patient’s family members who watch me make it up.

Here’s the rub though, nowhere in my protocols does it give me authority to give a patient any nourishment or fluids by mouth. In fact, I can’t give a patient anything to eat or drink that isn’t specifically allowed by my standing orders. In EMS, even something as innocuous as sugared-up orange juice can be a legal difficulty. Common sense isn’t allowed by lawyers, unless of course they’re saying you should have used some. The reality is that every time I whip up a Kaiser Cocktail, I’m putting my license at risk.

I used a Kaiser Cocktail as recently as of the day I’m writing this post and I’m asking for a debate here. I’d like it if you would please answer some questions for me below the post in the comments section:

  1. Do you think that the Kaiser Cocktail is an appropriate treatment for mild-to-moderate hypoglycemia in a known-diabetic patient with a patent airway?
  2. Do you see any contraindications or risks that I have missed?
  3. Would a tube of oral glucose paste (or tablets, if you use them) be more appropriate than the Kaiser Cocktail?
  4. Should EMS providers be allowed to improvise treatments such as the Kaiser Cocktail for these and other like situations? Why or Why not?

I can’t wait to see your answers.

Police Car Drivers, Ambulance Drivers, and their responsibilities

12 comments

Look at the pictures below and see if you can identify the three occupations represented by the people in the pictures.

What are their jobs?

What are their areas of expertise?

What would you expect them to be responsible for?

                                     

 

Yep, pretty much everyone reading this and almost every lay person you can think of should probably be able to answer the above questions. The Police Car Driver chases bad guys; The Fire Truck Driver squirts water at things; and the Paramedic takes care of people who are sick and hurt, right? Sure, their jobs sometimes overlap and so does some of their training, but the jobs and the requisite education and responsibilities are different and separate for a reason. The different roles up there are different, specialized, and require expertise in order to be effectively performed… right?

And before you think that I’m opening the Fire Based EMS can of worms, I want to direct you to this news story I just read on EMS1.com – Kentucky EMTs not called for 5 hours until coroner ruled woman was alive. Go read this and then come back please. It got me all riled up and I’m sure it will you as well.

The moral of the story, is that police officers were called for a dead body found in some bushes some where. They started doing their cop stuff and didn’t call EMS to evaluate the body because their cop training told them that the woman was obviously dead. Unfortunately for all involved, when the coroner arrived he told them that their police-issued medical training wasn’t adequate and that the woman was indeed alive.

And yes, I am 100% sure that nobody intended for that to be the tragic result.. people make mistakes, I know… but:

How many times have you been called out in your ambulance to a potential medical emergency and then cancelled while en route? Have you ever wondered who is cancelling you and for what reason? When we arrive on scene, we evaluate the patient and determine their need for transport. We have extensive training to help us do this and we function within a complex set of laws and regulations to help ensure that bad outcomes like this happen as infrequently as possible. Unfortunately, however, things like this do happen, even to experienced paramedics. How many times have you heard news stories about paramedics calling someone dead only to have them be found alive later on? How many times have you heard about occult neck fractures and other severe injuries being found later even after a patient was evaluated by a physician? It happens, folks… and it happens to us medical people too. Even with the training, knowledge, skills, and experience we have that is specifically geared to emergency medical care that is again enhanced by the fancy tools that we carry with us, we sometimes still make mistakes…

So why in the heck would a police officer, who as stated above chases bad guys and does other kinds of “cop stuff”, want to make the decision that someone was dead or not? It simply doesn’t make any sense to me. I have always been leery of having police officers call us off of medical scenes. Even when I know the officer and trust his or her judgment, I know that my medical training and tools are superior to theirs. That’s the way the system is designed, we do medical stuff and they do cop stuff.

I think that there’s a pervasive trend out there that causes dispatchers to send police units first to things like auto accidents and possible crimes in progress and then potentially forget to send EMS. Most of the time, it’s perfectly ok and turns out just fine. Other times, incidents like the above happen. How many times, also, has a police officer determined an auto accident to not require medical response and an occult injury been found later? I don’t know and haven’t seen any statistics… but I’ll bet it happens a lot more than is ever reported.

My advice? I promise to let the cops to their cop stuff. They just need to always remember to call me out to do my stuff. I don’t mind doing the report if I’m not needed or I get a refusal, I just don’t want anyone to suffer needlessly.

Be careful out there.

—————————————————

Want more of my thoughts on Fire Based EMS? See: “Fiddling While Rome Burns… The ambulance “industry”

When all you have is a hammer… Every problem looks like, lasix?

9 comments

A few years ago I responded to a structure fire on the main engine out of my station. The fire was at a house that had been converted to a dog kennel and grooming shop just a few blocks away from the firehouse and was a short response time. It was a light-staffing day and we responded as a three person engine company. As the senior firefighter I was the acting company officer and my new girlfriend at the time, who just happens to be my wife now, was the backseat firefighter. Get ready for the “Awwww” moment… it was our first fire “as a couple”. There was a number of cool things that came out of the fire, but one of them was the fact that Gina grabbed *my* maul.

My wife and I fighting our first fire "as a couple" - We're the ones in turnout gear

On our main engine, there’s an 8-pound maul (big hammer) that I grab as my tool of choice every time I jump off the truck for a fire. It just tucks so neatly in my SCBA’s belt and is so compact yet handy that I make a beeline for it every time. This time, Gina had taken it, so I grabbed a pick-head axe.

It’s amazing that when I have my maul that every access problem looks like something that I can solve by whacking it with a hammer of some sort. On this fire, I learned that when one has an axe, every problem looks like it can be solved by some sort of chopping.

Moral of the story, Gina and I entered the structure, saved the pooches, and stopped the fire in its trucks with minimal damage. There’s actually a hilarious video that I believe is still on our department’s web site that I’d let you see if I didn’t hide the name of the department(s) I work for due to “I want to remain employed reasons”.

And, like a lot of things on here, I told you that so I could tell you this about an EMS call I responded to an indeterminate amount of time ago. I have the honor and privilege to be the senior medic on most shifts I work and I precept a lot of students on the ambulance. This shift was no different and this 0-dark-30 call illustrates a point that I’d like to explain to you.

The doggies were SHOCKED that Gina took MY maul

For this call, the primary ambulance out of our station responded because they were on the way back from another call and my partner and I responded in our ambulance because we were up on the alternating call rotation. They arrived at the poorly-accessible apartment complex a few minutes before we did and made first patient contact. As it turns out, the middle age patient had ran out of his/her prescription Lasix (a potent diuretic, or water pill) a week or so prior to the call and had been retaining a great deal of excess bodily fluid. The patient’s legs were markedly and grossly swollen and weeping fluid out of fluid filled blisters. The Patient called us because he/she could no longer stand the pain of the cellulitis (infection) that had developed. The patient had no respiratory compromise, his/her lungs were clear, and he/she really had no other complaints. The patient had an extensive medical history of organ failure and disease. He/she was fully alert and oriented, and was able to assist us as we simply picked him/her up and carried him/her to the cot.

As we were loading the patient up in the ambulance and I was about to get into the back to continue my assessment and treatment of the patient, the EMT from the other ambulance who happens to be an almost-done Paramedic student told me, “So those legs are the worst I’ve ever seen fluid wise, you’re going to push some lasix on this one”. I mumbled something and got into the truck. I was tired and wasn’t really able to form complete sentences at the time due to sleep deprivation. I got in the truck and continued my assessment where I found that the frail patient had a blood pressure in the 70 systolic range (Low!) and that in addition to retaining fluid in his/her legs, he/she was also retaining fluid in his/her abdomen and was probably in need of a paracentesis. I managed the patient with a (beautifully executed) IV stick into an impossibly small crooked vein, and gave just enough fluid to bring his/her BP up a bit without adding to his/her fluid overload all that much. I put the Pt on oxygen and a cardiac monitor, which revealed a normal sinus rhythm without ectopy. I obtained a 12-lead EKG as well, which was not indicative of any acute problems. The patient stated that his/her pain was managed by padding and positioning of his/her swollen legs and even though he/she complained of no breathing problems, I put him/her on a bit of oxygen via nasal cannula.

The transport was uneventful, although his/her blood pressure never did come up. The ER later diagnosed the Pt with complete liver failure and toxicity.

But the interesting part of the story is this, when I got back the medic student asked me about giving IV lasix to the patient, as we carry that in our medication stock and have it available as an emergency diuretic for patients in congestive heart failure and/or fluid overload with pulmonary edema and respiratory compromise. He was almost taken aback when I said that I didn’t give any.

I asked him if he did a full assessment. He said that he had tried… but that he didn’t have enough time before I arrived and we took the patient out to the ambulance. I gave him my assessment findings and the news of the very low blood pressure. He said that he agreed with me on not giving the lasix with the markedly low blood pressure but was curious when I explained that it wasn’t the reason I didn’t give the medication.

We in EMS, and especially new providers carry our own hammers… our treatments and medications that we’re able to give in the field. Medics that use these treatments more often are called “aggressive” and it is a badge of honor. In fact, in some cases, aggressive field treatment is indeed warranted and improves patient outcomes. However, in a lot of cases it is not indicated and patients benefit from what we don’t do more so than from what we could have done.

This patient didn’t have any respiratory compromise and while he/she obviously could have benefited from the dieresis or removal of the excess fluid, she didn’t meet the criteria for emergent field administration of lasix, which is respiratory compromise from pulmonary edema. I made the decision to let the physician evaluate the patient and determine the best treatment path that would fit in with the patient’s ultimate plan of care. I didn’t believe that the patient would ultimately benefit from my administration of lasix twenty minutes earlier than the ER could have done it if the physician so chose.

Every treatment we administer must be given with a full assessment of the risks and benefits to the patient for doing so. Every EMS person should familiarize themselves with the long-term care paths of the conditions we treat and try to maximize the long-term benefit to the patient with the acute and short-term care we give. Not every problem is “a nail” and sometimes the hammers we carry aren’t the best ultimate solution for excellent patient care. Remembering how we as EMS people fit into the grand scheme of the overall healthcare system and in the ultimate care paths of our patients will help us all to do what we’re supposed to do, which is to provide excellent and appropriate patient care.

It is also of note, I guess, that Gina rarely steals my maul anymore. Now that we’re married… I “give it freely” to her.. What’s mine is her’s, as they say.

EMS 2.0 as Explained to My Brother

14 comments

My brother is an engineer. Yes, he’s a firefighter and occasionally he still drives the Fire Truck, but I’m not talking about being an engineer as it relates to the fire service. I’m talking about a pocket-protector wearing, slide-rule-sliding Engineer who draws lines on paper and calculates weight to strength ratios and the like. It’s math that’s way over my head and I’m glad that he’s the one that has to do that type of work every day and not me. When he explains his job to me my brain starts to overheat and I’m surprised that my hair hasn’t caught on fire yet. It started smoking once, but I was able to catch a glimpse of “The Hills” on the TV and it slowed my mental activity just in time.

My brother, Captain Kaiser, is a volunteer fire captain and he used to be an EMT although he let it lapse due to the fact that it limited time with his family. I guess that I got the EMS genes and he got the “go to college and get a real job that pays well” genes. I say more power to him and he’s one of my best friends. I don’t get to see him as much as I should, but we talk often on the phone. He has always been interested in hearing all of my tales of EMS glory, and I listen to tales of his two daughters. Raising daughters sounds waaaay different than raising my son.

The other day I was talking to him about “this blogging stuff I do” and I breached the subject of EMS 2.0. I haven’t written much about EMS 2.0 by name lately, although the concepts I’ve been bringing forth fit into my model of it, but trust me when I say there has been a lot of behind the scenes activity. It turned into an interesting conversation with my brother. He was an EMT but never got past the volunteering when his community needs him stage. That’s an honorable place to be, no doubt, but he didn’t delve into the level that I take it to. So explaining EMS 2.0 to him was close to explaining it to an educated lay person.

In the conversation, I brought up the scenario that I used to write the post: “Are We the Gatekeepers to the Emergency Healthcare System?” (Unofficially titled, “Did I do good?”) and explained to him how I evaluated a patient in a nursing home, performed a full assessment on her including a 12-lead EKG and a review of her recent lab work, held a telephone conference with her Primary Care Physician and the Nursing staff on scene, and triaged the patient to the Primary Heathcare System as opposed to the Emergency Healthcare System. In the process, I saved the healthcare system (in the form of Medicare) thousands of dollars and provided better care to the patient by deferring her from the emergency room. I explained to him that my ambulance service could not bill the patient for the care I provided her because we did not transport and that the current system needs to recognize the value in having EMS provide such services in terms of cost-savings. If I would have transported, our service would have made the revenue, but Medicare would have paid thousands of dollars in unnecessary care overall. Since I didn’t, I saved Medicare thousands, but the service wasn’t valued and we didn’t receive any compensation for our work.

Basically, the conversation wound up being that he agreed with me that EMS has a powerful position to improve access to primary care and “save” healthcare as it were by increasing access to primary care, properly deferring patients from the emergency healthcare system when their care could be more appropriately managed in the primary care setting, and by saving millions of dollars in the overall healthcare setting. He agreed with me that it would require deregulation of the EMS industry to allow us to attempt programs and offer new services outside of our current mold and would require increased education of street-level EMS providers to get this done. He also agreed with me that money we’re already collectively spending should be allocated from inefficient programs and given to efficient high-performance EMS systems to do this in order to realize greater savings.

Remember, he’s an engineer. He’s good at math. He may not be a healthcare provider currently schlepping patients around in a shiny red and white bus that makes “woo woo” sounds, but he’s as smart as they come…

And when I told him that he’s exactly who we should be getting our message out to, he disagreed. He thinks that we should be out there talking to politicians and Insurance Industry executives. Honestly, he chastised me for not being in my local congresshuman’s office to do just that.

So, here’s a shoutout to the politicos out there: “EMS can ‘save’ healthcare through a free-market, grass-roots, innovative solution using currently available resources. We can save millions and improve the entire healthcare system just by putting in place a few good ideas and allowing EMS professionals the ability to think outside of the box”.

So do me a favor, y’all. Go tell your local politico to e-mail me at Proems1@yahoo.com. I’d love to have a talk with them. You should too.

To Kneel or not to Kneel

23 comments
“Muungh… What the heck was that!?” I thought to myself as I looked around the darkened room. “Where am I? Why am I awake? What IS that awful noise?” I thought. Something had awoken me from a not-so-good sleep on a not-so-comfy sofa. Slowly, I realized where I was. “I must have fallen asleep in the day room at the station” I thought. “Why am I awake?”. I heard commotion outside and realized that it must have been the radio that woke me up. Somewhere in the dark subconscious recesses of my brain it came to me that the pager said “Person not breathing, CPR in progress”. I pulled on my shoes and thought the most important thought that any EMS provider can have when being jolted from a deep sleep at 0′ dark 30 to try and wake the dead: “I have to pee!”

 

 

Once the bathroom duty was completed I slid into the passenger seat of the ambulance and pulled up the address on the map program. My partner pointed the ambulance South while I clicked on the siren. Wailing into the night we went, lights flashing, adrenaline pumping, morning breath so bad I could slay a walrus. “Where did I put that mouthwash?” was my thought. So focused on the job were we.

Arriving at the address just behind the engine company from the first due station we hurried to gather up our gear for the battle ahead. Monitor? Check. Airway and drug bags? Check and Check. Backboard? Check that too. We hurry up to the front door and are met by a middle aged female saying “I couldn’t wake him up! He was fine when we went to bed!” We enter the bedroom and I see the middle aged male on the bed. His lifeless eyes were fixed and unseeing as we approached him. His mottled skin was cool to the touch. Long gone was any fighting chance at life. I knelt on the bed next to his torso to check a pulse and apply pads to get a strip and immediately know what is going to happen next.

“I’m freakin going to have freakin dead guy pee on my freakin knees for the rest of the freakin shift! Dang it! Dang it! Dang it!”

EMS people kneel a lot, and not just when we want a raise or need to get state-to-state reciprocity from an EMS office. At one of the departments I work at we did a big action photo spread of all of the EMTs and Medics in action. EVERY SHOT was me kneeling. Kneeling at a patient’s head working on the airway, kneeling at the patient’s chest starting an IV, kneeling next to a patient to assess them after an injury, I kneel so much that you’d think I have a promotion by now. We all do.

But you’d think that by now I’d know enough not to kneel in poo, pee, blood, vomit, or whatever vile substance is on the bed, floor, or surface that I have to kneel on. I mean come on. I’ve been doing this over a decade now. I have thousands of calls under my belt. I live, sleep, eat, breathe, blog, and study EMS as much as I can stand to (and that’s a lot) and I *still* am stupid enough to put my knees in poo on a somewhat regular basis?

Right now, I’m on the 2nd day of a 48hr shift a half hour away from my home. Last night, around late evening I knelt in a poo/pee mixture. I was really trying not to here, but the patient began to vomit after we got (the Pt) on the backboard in the cramped, carpeted bathroom (the Pt) was in. I couldn’t log roll (the Pt) without kneeling and the carpet was just saturated with a vile mixture of hours old poo/pee. My knees got soaked in it. And no, if you are asking, I ran out of the house late and didn’t think to bring an extra pair of pants and the pants that I had kept at the station had been taken home for laundering after another like incident.

For times like these, I recommend the “Ckemtp” method of knee disinfection. It applies for those times where call volumes don’t allow you to actually take your pants off to clean them:

  1. Put on gloves. No sense in contaminating your hands. Chances are your knees won’t have broken skin on them unless you’ve been trying to get that promotion (Enough with the “on your knees” jokes! – This is serious!)
  2. Take and put a towel or washcloth (a smaller wash cloth works better) in between your knees and your pants.
  3. Spray the ever-loving bejeebus out of your pants, saturating your knees with disinfectant spray. DO NOT use bleach-based spray. The milder the better. (see “Clean EMS” for advice on contact times)
  4. Press another towel on the outside of your pants, soaking up as much poo/pee laced disinfectant into the towels as you can. Rub them together a bit.
  5. Re spray with disinfectant and let it air dry.
  6. Remove the towels from your pants.
  7. Call your wife and beg her to drive you up a new pair. Beg. Hard.

Just for the record, my lovely wife was unable to drive me up some new pants. Awesome…..

A Slap in the Face for Medics? How about a Wake-up call

20 comments

Thank you everyone! Yesterday when I posted “A Slap in the Face to Paramedics Everywhere?” I recorded my biggest traffic day ever by at least one thousand visitors. I’m honored. Thank you for coming and reading this and thank you for caring about EMS. Especially, thank you those who left such intelligent comments and added to the debate. We who care about our profession need people who are passionate, intelligent, and who are ready to work alongside of us to improve who we are and what we do. By participating here and in the wider EMS blogosphere, you’re helping spread the ideas that we need to spread. Read, Talk, Learn, and Think. Make this the profession you want it to be.

I’m going to repeat that above statement: “Make this the profession you want it to be”

And there lies the true meaning of what I wrote yesterday. Sure, I was mad about the perceived encroachment by nurses onto our professional “turf”, and sure I played my anger up into what I thought would be something to fire you up as well, but there was a message there that not everyone may have gotten.

I know that there are good nurses out there that know a lot about a lot of stuff. A lot of them do a great job in the field within their scope and their experience in such things as neonatology, pediatrics, and critical care has proven invaluable to me on a lot of occasions. Yes, like each and every medic out there I can speak volumes about the times I’ve seen and worked with nurses who seem to be lacking vital chromosomes, but I’ve seen members of every profession that seem to have written their final exams in crayon. It’s no different when I am staffed alongside an idiot partner of the EMT persuasion… give me a smart nurse in their place any day.

However, my beef is this: Why is it necessary that a nurse need ever step into the field? The times I’ve had to carry one in the back of my rig have been mainly because of protocol deficiencies, where the EMS system I was working in at the time didn’t allow me to transport a specialized piece of equipment that was attached to a patient or to administer medications that were beyond the normal scope of the field. Now days, my EMS system allows me to transport pretty much anything and I’ve personally taken the steps to educate myself on the less-common things that I see. However, I’ve grabbed a nurse on occasion when called to transport multiple uncommon medications along with unfamiliar equipment. I’ve never been too proud to ask for help when I wasn’t fully confident in my abilities to fully handle possible eventualities with the patient. It’s not about my ego, it’s about patient care. I live by that motto. However there is no reason, in my opinion, that a paramedic cannot take the education necessary to become experts in any and every aspect of out-of-hospital care. It’s our bread and butter and the thought that our skills are lacking causes me concern. Whatever you call it: inter-hospital, pre-hospital, field, or other care… Paramedics are supposed to be the experts at that in my opinion and I want us to take the steps to ensure that we are so.

If you were angered by the actions of this ambulance service plastering their truck with the phrase “Staffed by Nurses”, that’s good. You should have been. Be angry at the management of that service for existing in a system that they haven’t changed for the better so that they don’t have to use nurses for things that paramedics should be doing. Be angry at their EMS system and their state for limiting their paramedics’ scope of practice and education so that they cannot be used to adequately staff the truck. Then, be angry at each and every one of us for not taking the ownership of our profession so that we can step up and dictate what is best for the patient’s we serve.

Is that petty “turf preservation”? Maybe. However we need some of that. For us to have pride in our profession we need to take the steps necessary to own what we are supposed to own. If we can see our profession lacking the necessary educational background, skills, or just plain old gumption to fix a problem, then we have to band together to do the work needed to fix it. The fact that this service and this system are thinking that having and advertising a “special” truck, “Staffed by Nurses” is a good idea is representative of a bigger problem, and that bigger problem must be handled by our people stepping up and handling our deficiencies so that we can solve the problem. We must improve the education, improve our skills, and improve our public perception so that people trust us beyond just the feel-good perception we have as “life saving” “ambulance drivers”.

You’ve heard me, Justin “the Happy Medic” Schorr, Mark “Medic999” Glencorse, and many, many others talking about EMS 2.0 over the last year. Well, this is part of it. My version of EMS 2.0 involves us paramedics taking ownership of problems like these and taking the necessary collaborative steps to fix them. We have to do just that if we want to advance. Now is the time for us to analyze the problems, dissolve the political boundaries, do the necessary work, and collectively grow up as a profession.

And fixing management philosophies that view us as contemptible morons is first.

One last comment, I got a link in a fascinating article by the Nursing Show ran by my buddy Jamie Davis. You should read it, it’s a good way to see how the nurses take this.

————————————————-

Also, for more of my thoughts on the state of EMS in the State of Illinois, check out “Dear Illinois EMS”

A Slap in the Face to Paramedics Everywhere?

89 comments

As some of you probably know, last weekend I went to the Fire Department Instructors’ Conference (FDIC) in Indianapolis, IN and I spent a great deal of time wandering the convention floor, looking at cool things and talking to cool people. There were plenty of great things to see and great new things to learn about and I immersed myself in doing just that. One of the things I’m always interested in is looking at the new trends in ambulance design and the manufacturers always have their coolest new vehicles on display to feed my interest. However, while walking the conference floor, I came across an ambulance that did more to tick me off than it did to promote their new vehicle design. Seriously, it was like someone slapped me in the face. Here’s the picture I took from my phone:

 Ambulance Staffed by RNs

Does anybody see anything wrong with that picture? I was immediately ticked off…  I’m talking a level 7 hissy fit. I was livid for quite a while and if you follow my twitter feed, you probably saw the three or four times I TwitPic’d it.

I mean really? They had to put “Staffed By Nurses” in six inch high script on three sides of this thing?

I blocked out the name of the service that runs the ambulance and in all fairness to the manufacturer, this truck is awesome. I would be quite happy to work in this truck although being that it has no bench seat, its usefulness as a 911 truck is hampered by its inability to carry more than one patient at a time. However, I would flatly refuse to work in this truck or for the ambulance service that puts it on the street. I happen to know the service that bought it and I’m trying to avoid naming them directly, but they serve a midsize city in Illinois.

Before you go all West Side Story, whip out your switch blade and zip gun, and prepare to have a dance fight with the nurses out there, realize that I’m not mad at them. Sure, mostly they’re well-paid and have climate controlled jobs inside of well-lit buildings, but they didn’t do this to us. My beef is with the management of this particular ambulance service.

So, let’s say that you’re the manager of this particular ambulance service. Obviously, sitting there in your office you must think that your paramedics and EMTs are contemptible morons who live simply to cause you problems. Furthering your view of the world, you probably think that the rest of the medical profession and the members of the general public in your area view them the same way and simply don’t trust them to provide medical care when it’s like *really* complicated and stuff. You probably feel that everyone would feel safer knowing that their patient or loved one is traveling via the companionship of “nurses” whom you must view as actually being like actually *Competent* and stuff.  

And that’s what this rolling billboard to your contempt of your employees and their profession says about you. It’s a slap in the face to the good men and women you have working for you and there is flatly no excuse for it.

Here’s a tip, anonymous ambulance manager person (AAMP). There isn’t a need to have your precious ambulance be “staffed by nurses” when you have sufficiently equipped and prepared paramedics working in it. Paramedics are acute care specialists. We’re also experts in mobile medicine. Our education, training, and experience prepare us for the unique environment that we create when we move patients from one place to another. Critical Care Paramedics have the intensive Care experience, training, and background needed to operate in a critical care ambulance environment, nurses do not. Sure, ICU and ER nurses are great at Critical Care. However you shouldn’t regularly staff a critical care nurse in the transport environment for the same reasons that you wouldn’t put a critical care paramedic inside of the ICU. The professions are like in a lot of ways, but they’re separate for a good reason.

And you, AAMP, don’t respect that. Perhaps it’s because you’re burnt out. Perhaps it’s because you’ve beaten the system you’ve created into such a pulp that nobody wanted to staff your new Critical Care Truck. Perhaps it’s because of a lot of reasons, but it’s certainly not because you wanted the best in patient care or to show that your employees are capable of operating your shiny new “special” ambulance. No, you wanted “nurses” to “staff” that truck… and not only did you want the medical people you’re contracting with to know this, you wanted everyone who saw the truck to know it as the 6 inch high letters stating that fact clearly show. Do you think that the public views your crews as incompetent? If so, do you think that furthering the notion by advertising that your “special” truck is “staffed by nurses” will help that situation?

If your protocols are so draconian that even critical care certified paramedics cannot be allowed to staff that truck, then your protocol system is in the Stone Age. If your educational system isn’t up to the challenge of preparing your most experienced medics to staff it, then fix that problem. I know that there are great medic/nurse combos out there and I know that flight nurses have garnered quite a bit of respect out there in the world… and heck, I’m not knocking them for doing it. However, this is the time for Paramedics to step up and claim our turf. This ambulance clinched it for me. AAMP, your shortsightedness has caused me to lead a revolution of sorts here. You’re contempt for your staff has indicated to me that now is the time for paramedics and EMTs, such as the ones that work for you, to stand up and start claiming what is rightfully ours. Frankly, AAMP, your ambulance and your attitude is ridiculous and thinking like that must be stamped out right now by the good medics among us.

And I should also say this to the nurses in the audience before you start skewering me for knocking you: Have you looked at the debates in your circles concerning the use of paramedics in the ER and in other hospital units? Have you ever seen the term “Unlicensed Assistive Personnel”? Well I have, and it’s what the upper nursing echelon calls me and my professional colleagues.  It’s offensive, but hey… our jobs are different. You have the hospitals and the fixed facilities. That’s what you do. We have the field. It’s what we do. There’s a line, respect it. If you want to do EMS, go through a real paramedic program. If we want to do nursing, we should go to nursing school. Really, it’s that simple. The transport environment is difficult and requires the use of specialized personnel… which we have, they’re called paramedics. The medical care we provide is close to the care that you provide, except we have autonomy that you do not and we are use to working independently in the environment in which we operate. Your focus is different than mine.  You may be the best transport nurse out there, but even though you personally may be awesome, my profession needs to have people as awesome as you working on our side. That’s what this is about, not to knock your transport nursing skills, but to kick us paramedics in the shorts and get us to step up and maintain ownership of what we should own.

The responses I got back on Twitter show me that there are a lot of like minded individuals out there. Perhaps some of them might work for you, AAMP. You better take that into consideration because if I have my way the paramedics are going to get the notion that we’re not just a bunch of contemptible morons and we’re soon going to take control of our own profession. On that day, managers like you will be obsolete. Perhaps you can get a job managing nurses.

Here is my personal ‘thumbs down’ for the graffiti against my profession that you had someone slather on your shiny new truck, AAMP. My advice? Take it off and reconsider your staffing patterns. What you’re doing is bad for my profession. It affects me negatively, it affects my profession negatively, and it shall not go unanswered.

What do you think?

—————————————————————

Be sure to check out the follow-up to this post “A Slap in the Face? How about a Wake-Up Call?”

Also, for more of my thoughts on the state of EMS in the State of Illinois, check out “Dear Illinois EMS”

Advances in Prehospital Analgesia and Conscious Sedation

10 comments

Pain is endemic within Emergency Medical Services, whether it’s the pain from a grotesque traumatic injury, the chest pain from a heart attack, or the emotional pain suffered by the local teenage drama queen in response to a minor texting-while-driving incident. EMTs and Paramedics must become better at overall pain management and in conscious sedation. Luckily, there are researchers and pioneers working on new and innovative strategies for just that end.

Researchers at the Plover, WI Polytechnic Institute of Cosmetology and Cheese Making  (PPICCM) have been bringing some cutting edge research to the forefront of Prehospital Pain Management and Prehospital Conscious Sedation and have released some new technologies for use in the field. They have field tested these devices in the dive bars in and around Plover on Friday and Saturday nights and even once or twice on the infamous “TwoFer Tuesdays” down at MoeLarry’s Curly Fries and Cheese Bar. They have come up with compelling data that your agency should consider for your own use.

Tradtionally, EMS providers have had a few choices for use in prehospital analgesia and conscious sedation. Advanced providers and paramedics have injectable medications for use, and basic level providers and EMTs have basic splinting and positioning for use in controlling severe pain and the secret weapon for use in putting people to sleep. These medications, including Morphine, Fentanyl, Toradol, Aspirin, and sometimes Nitronox have proven to be very effective, but all of them carry with them side effects and the risk of allergic reactions that can prove fatal in some patients. So can the medications used in Drug Assisted or Rapid Sequence Intubation Techniques: Etomidate, Succynocholine, and the like. To reduce the risk of poor outcomes from these medications, the researchers at PPICCM have developed the following tools:

  • The Open Handed Slap – This is effective as a calming technique for persons who have become hysterical due to superficial trauma to their fingers as well as for family members overcome with emotion due to their loved-one’s bout of indigestion. An example is included below:

 

  • The Mallet Method of Anesthesia Induction – Pioneered by the indomitable Drs Moe, Larry, and Curly (and previously by Dr. Shemp), the use of mallets in induction of conscious sedation is well documented. Simple, yet elegant in it’s use, cranial contact by the fast-moving business end of a mallet is highly effective in reducing any complaints of pain from a patient. In fact, just the visual feedback recieved from opening the case the mallet is stored in and showing the patient that you are preparing to use said mallet is effective in reducing complaints from most alert patients. However, if needed for use, one or two blows in rapid succession is shown to be quite effective in the literature. An example is included below:

 

  • Transcutaneous Oxygen Therapy (TOT-WTYTR) - This method involves pressing the external wall of a “D” sized oxygen cylinder against a bony prominence of a patient in the throws of a violent reaction towards EMS providers. Use of TOT can be handled by both Basic and Advanced providers and it’s effects are determined by the speed and location of the bony prominence that the side wall of the oxygen cylinder is applied to. Lower extremities can be calming while the head and cranium can induce anesthesia and facilitate Rapid Sequence Intubation in most patients. Unfortunately, there is no accompanying video literature for this particular therapy, however it is a simple technique to learn.

Thanks to the brilliant scientists at the PPICCM, prehospital anesthesia and analgesia is in good hands. These simple yet powerful techniques are scheduled to be released for use by my agencies on April Fools Day and should NEVER EVER be used by yours. Ta’ Y’all. Happy Spring.

Trust… It’s everything

4 comments

Dooooo Doooooo! Beep Beep Beep Beep Beep Beep Beep  - Attention AMBULANCE ONE, Ambulance One. Respond Code 3. 1234 Anystreet lane, 1234 Anystreet lane for the (Insert Age and Gender Here) patient found unresponsive, unknown if breathing.

Imagine you heard that dispatch go out just now. Imagine you’re at home, off duty, and just happen to be listening to your dispatch channel. Perhaps you’re a volunteer, perhaps you have a scanner, but picture yourself hearing that and realizing… “Oh My God… That’s So-and-So’s house! A (blank) aged Male/Female? That’s gotta be So-And-So!!”

As an EMS person who lives in your district you know the people who work on the service. Now you’re sure you know the patient too. It’s someone you care deeply about and it sounds like they may be in mortal danger. As someone “in the know” you know what you’re going to do next, right? You’re going to listen intently to whatever traffic happens to come out next on the radio, aren’t you?

“Come on, Come on, Come on!” you think to yourself as you wait the agonizing seconds for the crew to acknowledge the page and go enroute to the scene. “What’s taking them so long!?” you ask yourself. “Ambulance 1 is enroute to 1234 Anystreet Lane” says the crew of Ambulance One over the radio. You don’t think that they sound excited enough. They must not know that this is So-and-So! To them, this is just a routine response for an unresponsive patient. They’re going to do a routine, every day job and perform their routine, every day care. They don’t have any idea that this patient is special to you and they’re going to give this patient the same care they’d give anyone else.

Now, since you’re sitting at home and unable to respond, you’re going to be glued to that radio, right? You’re going to know from the voice on the radio exactly who it is that will be taking care of “So-and-So”. You’re going to either be relieved or horrified by your knowledge of who’s on that responding ambulance. If you have trust in the medic on the truck, you’ll feel slightly better about So-and-So’s chances of survival. If you don’t have trust in the medics, you’ll probably feel a lot worse… right?

It’s always been a sticky ethical situation for a healthcare provider at any level to work on someone they know well and care deeply about. Try it just once, or more realistically for an EMS provider, have the situation thrust upon you, and you’ll see that “Stuff gets real” really quick. We have a vested interest in the care that our loved ones receive and while some of us may know that it isn’t always best that we personally be the one caring for them, we all understandably want them to receive the best care possible.

Trusting a provider to care for your special “So-and-So” is a big deal. I’m sure we all have secret mental lists of our colleagues whom we’d want caring for our loved ones and also our lists of who we wouldn’t. It is a supreme responsibility to be a healthcare provider in charge of the care of any patient and I believe that EMTs and Paramedics hold that responsibility every bit as much as or more so than any other healthcare provider. It is a responsibility that I don’t take lightly and one that I hope my colleagues do not either. We are the first people that our patients and their families want to see walk through their door when the unthinkable happens. When the situation is critical, and skilled, complex, time-sensitive care makes the difference between life and death, we are the ones out there doing just that. A good paramedic must be knowledgeable, highly skilled, and experienced to provide that level of care. Not just that, they must do it every time they get in their truck; because every patient is somebody’s “So-and-So”.

Speaking of “stuff getting real” I have to ask you: What kind of provider are you?

Are you out there every day earning the trust of your peers?

Do you work hard enough, study hard enough, and train hard enough?

Do you do your absolute best for every patient, every time?

When it does happen (and it will) that you are sent to care for a colleague’s “So-and-So”, are you the kind of provider they will trust?

If you think about these questions, you know the answers already. If you can honestly say that you’re good enough, I salute you. If not, well then we have some work to do, don’t we?

Earn it. Study hard. Know your stuff. Do your best. Every patient. Every time.


Random Pages Created By Best Accountant Services