Skip to content


Trust… It’s everything

Comments

Dooooo Doooooo! Beep Beep Beep Beep Beep Beep Beep  - Attention AMBULANCE ONE, Ambulance One. Respond Code 3. 1234 Anystreet lane, 1234 Anystreet lane for the (Insert Age and Gender Here) patient found unresponsive, unknown if breathing.

Imagine you heard that dispatch go out just now. Imagine you’re at home, off duty, and just happen to be listening to your dispatch channel. Perhaps you’re a volunteer, perhaps you have a scanner, but picture yourself hearing that and realizing… “Oh My God… That’s So-and-So’s house! A (blank) aged Male/Female? That’s gotta be So-And-So!!”

As an EMS person who lives in your district you know the people who work on the service. Now you’re sure you know the patient too. It’s someone you care deeply about and it sounds like they may be in mortal danger. As someone “in the know” you know what you’re going to do next, right? You’re going to listen intently to whatever traffic happens to come out next on the radio, aren’t you?

“Come on, Come on, Come on!” you think to yourself as you wait the agonizing seconds for the crew to acknowledge the page and go enroute to the scene. “What’s taking them so long!?” you ask yourself. “Ambulance 1 is enroute to 1234 Anystreet Lane” says the crew of Ambulance One over the radio. You don’t think that they sound excited enough. They must not know that this is So-and-So! To them, this is just a routine response for an unresponsive patient. They’re going to do a routine, every day job and perform their routine, every day care. They don’t have any idea that this patient is special to you and they’re going to give this patient the same care they’d give anyone else.

Now, since you’re sitting at home and unable to respond, you’re going to be glued to that radio, right? You’re going to know from the voice on the radio exactly who it is that will be taking care of “So-and-So”. You’re going to either be relieved or horrified by your knowledge of who’s on that responding ambulance. If you have trust in the medic on the truck, you’ll feel slightly better about So-and-So’s chances of survival. If you don’t have trust in the medics, you’ll probably feel a lot worse… right?

It’s always been a sticky ethical situation for a healthcare provider at any level to work on someone they know well and care deeply about. Try it just once, or more realistically for an EMS provider, have the situation thrust upon you, and you’ll see that “Stuff gets real” really quick. We have a vested interest in the care that our loved ones receive and while some of us may know that it isn’t always best that we personally be the one caring for them, we all understandably want them to receive the best care possible.

Trusting a provider to care for your special “So-and-So” is a big deal. I’m sure we all have secret mental lists of our colleagues whom we’d want caring for our loved ones and also our lists of who we wouldn’t. It is a supreme responsibility to be a healthcare provider in charge of the care of any patient and I believe that EMTs and Paramedics hold that responsibility every bit as much as or more so than any other healthcare provider. It is a responsibility that I don’t take lightly and one that I hope my colleagues do not either. We are the first people that our patients and their families want to see walk through their door when the unthinkable happens. When the situation is critical, and skilled, complex, time-sensitive care makes the difference between life and death, we are the ones out there doing just that. A good paramedic must be knowledgeable, highly skilled, and experienced to provide that level of care. Not just that, they must do it every time they get in their truck; because every patient is somebody’s “So-and-So”.

Speaking of “stuff getting real” I have to ask you: What kind of provider are you?

Are you out there every day earning the trust of your peers?

Do you work hard enough, study hard enough, and train hard enough?

Do you do your absolute best for every patient, every time?

When it does happen (and it will) that you are sent to care for a colleague’s “So-and-So”, are you the kind of provider they will trust?

If you think about these questions, you know the answers already. If you can honestly say that you’re good enough, I salute you. If not, well then we have some work to do, don’t we?

Earn it. Study hard. Know your stuff. Do your best. Every patient. Every time.

Care to Share My Stuff?? C'mon, Go ahead.
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • MySpace
  • Twitter
  • Technorati

Two Cases, One letter – From one Paramedic’s struggles, change can come

Comments

A letter I received from a reader recently has gotten me just as mad as he is, even more so maybe. This letter came in from someone who identifies himself as a paramedic but asks that I protect his identity and location completely. I will do so, only identifying that the letter comes from someone who works out west, somewhere between the Mississippi and Montana but not east as Maine or as far south as Amarillo.

So He comes from somewhere in the US, not the east coast, and not Hawaii. He’s a paramedic and he’s male. That’s all I’ll say. I’m going to work the things he wrote me in his letter with my thoughts and feelings on what he wrote and the situation he wrote about. I’ll rewrite the letter keeping the point of it intact. I’m fairly sure that you’ll be just as angered as I. (Note – This is LONG but it’s good. It will probably tick you off too, enjoy)

(more…)

Care to Share My Stuff?? C'mon, Go ahead.
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • MySpace
  • Twitter
  • Technorati

The Perfect Emergency? Well, almost

Comments

So a while ago, I went to an emergency medical call that was about as perfect as an EMS call could be.

Picture this if you will. Our ambulance was in service. The system was at normal operating levels which are well funded and are adequate for our response loads 90% of the time. I had thoroughly checked and cleaned my ambulance and the equipment inside of it at the beginning of my shift and I had even gotten a chance to have a cup of coffee or two before the call came in. When the call did come out over the radio, it was merely a short walk to the ambulance for my paramedic partner and I. We climbed into our dual paramedic staffed, well maintained, state-of-the-art ambulance, and rolled out to the scene of the emergency which was about 8 blocks away through light traffic. We arrived within 4 minutes of the 911 call and were informed by our dispatcher that the residence was equipped with a “Knox Box” entry system so we could quickly gain entry. We retrieved the key from our ambulance, were able to open the Knox Box, and easily entered the residence using the key inside of it. While entering, we noticed that the resident had a “Vial of Life” sticker on the front door, which signified that the patient was most probably participating in our “Vial of Life” program, meaning that the patient had all of their medical information written down properly on one of our stock forms. In fact, we found the “Vial of Life” right in the refrigerator door, where it was supposed to be.  The patient, an elderly person, had used a (Non brand-name specific) home emergency call button to summon assistance, which we also had recommended to him/her during the public outreach that convinced her to have everything else in place for our arrival.

In short, this patient had done almost everything right. He/She had paid taxes throughout his/her long time living in the district and had supported us in order to allow us to have quality, state-of-the-art equipment. He/She had supported us so that we could get good training as well. He/She had listened to us when we suggested that He/She wear an emergency call button as he/she got up there in years, had written down his/her medical information in the “Vial of Life”, had put the Vial of Life in the correct place, and had even installed a Knox Box on the home so we could gain access quickly.

So what wasn’t right with this call? The patient had been experiencing symptoms consistent with a stroke. In fact, it was an easy diagnosis from across the room type of stroke. The patient had noticed that he/she was possibly having stroke-like symptoms and had decided that it would be best to get cleaned up, get dressed, clean up the house a little, and call a neighbor over to see if he would take him/her to the doctor’s office before the neighbor convinced the patient to press the button and call us out to help. By that time… well let’s hope the doctors can work some magic.

With all of the bloggers, paramedics, EMTs, and everyone else out there harping about “BS” 911 ambulance calls, one would find it easy to overlook cases like the one above. I for one will come right out and say that I will gladly run 100 nonsense EMS calls rather than miss just one of the above… I don’t want someone to die or suffer further morbidity simply because they were too scared, or polite, or timid to call an ambulance.

I don’t know how to fix the problem, I’d just like to remind you all out there that our job is indeed to take care of people when they’re scared, when they’re sick, and when they’re just plain-ol’ stupid. We’re healthcare providers and it’s our duty. No exceptions.

Remember that.

Care to Share My Stuff?? C'mon, Go ahead.
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • MySpace
  • Twitter
  • Technorati

Ten (or so) things that you should try to do with every patient

Comments

 

I am not a perfect medical provider. In fact I’m really only practicing prehospital medicine (Ha ha!) but there are a few things that I try to do with every patient to improve my care for them and improve their comfort level as I care for them. I can’t claim that I always remember to do these things, but I really try to. I think that you should too.

Here they are (in no particular order other than ZIP code):

  1. Always introduce yourself and your partner to the patients and their loved ones using your first name. I wouldn’t want some upstart guy in some uniform type thing just randomly poking at me. I think that it reduces patient anxiety when you properly introduce yourself to your patient. I say “Hi, I’m Chris and I’m a paramedic with F&B Ambulance Service and Taxi Squad. This is my partner Fuzzy McGee. What is your name Sir/Madame?”

     

  2. When you’re in the back transporting the patient after you’ve given them most of the care you were planning to give them, go over your assessment again. Ask the patient questions that get them to expand on their original answers. Challenge yourself to find anything that you may have missed. 
  3. Play a game with yourself. Try to have the patient diagnosed by the time that you get them to the ER. If you can’t figure it out, fire up the internet when you get back to quarters and look it up. You’ll learn a lot of good medical information by doing this. I have.

     

  4. Once you get the patient in the back of the ambulance if they’re not facing an immediate “Life-or-Death” crisis ask them “Is there anything I can do to make you more comfortable?” Maybe another pillow or moving the head of the cot up or down would help them. Do it if they ask.

     

  5. Try not to have the pillow stuffed under the patient’s shoulder blades. It makes it uncomfortable when they’re lying on the cot. Moving the pillow up from under their back and placing it under their heads makes them a lot happier. They won’t know to ask for it. Just do it.

     

  6. If you find a patient down with an isolated fracture or dislocation get pain meds in their system before you start splinting or packaging them. It does take a bit more time, but you’re not being very humane if you don’t.

     

  7. You are the patient’s advocate when you walk in to the imposing world of ER care. Your job is to present them to a medical system that is overworked and overtired. Stick up for them and make sure that the medical care providers that are following you learn about what is wrong with the patient before you throw him or her to the wolves… er, um, nurses. I mean nurses.

     

  8. Before you hand off your patient to the ER, ask them: “Is there anything that I haven’t addressed? Is there anything that you would like me to be sure and tell the ER about?”

     

  9. Explain to the the patient WHAT you are going to do and WHY you are going to do it.

     

  10. Approach EMS with a servant’s heart. No matter what some EMTs may think, we are here for the patients. It’s not the other way around.

     

By trying to do these things you’ll provide better patient care. I think that I’ve grown as an EMS professional by doing these things. I’ve also grown as a person by doing these things. Let me know how this works out for ya.

Care to Share My Stuff?? C'mon, Go ahead.
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • MySpace
  • Twitter
  • Technorati

Mental Quickness – Do Smart Alecks Make Better EMTs?

Comments

Alright, I admit it. Driving to work this morning was a bit of a challenge. We had two inches of fresh snow and the tires in my car are in desperate need of replacement. Yes, I drive a Subaru and usually it’s all-wheel drive does awesome in the snow… but I cheaped out on the tires, and they’re honestly a bit mismatched size-wise. Therefore driving it in conditions even remotely slick is hard as heck. I would have driven the SUV and had no problems at all but the wife had to drive the kid to school and then had to drive into the city afterwards and I wanted her to have the safe vehicle. Who cares if I go into the ditch? Work can do without me if they have to, but I need my family to be safe.

Since I think of things to write about when I drive, this morning brought my thoughts to how hard I had to concentrate on the road and the minute adjustments of the steering wheel and the accelerator needed in order to keep the car safely on track. Like everyone who knows about driving in slick conditions, I kept my eyes on the road ahead of me in order to “read” the changes in the road surface before I got to them in order to be ready to quickly make the adjustments needed to keep the car heading in the right direction. See a dark shiny patch? Foot off the gas, be ready to steer slightly away from it when the car slides in that direction. See a pile of snow with a frozen rut running through it? Minutely avoid it if possible and steer into the slide with just enough change in the gas to power through the slide. I made it to work, but I had to call in a favor to have a guy stay over for me for ten minutes. I let him know the night before that he might have to, and I did leave early… but I’m not wrecking the car just so I can save a few moments.

I consider myself a pretty good driver in the snow. In a vehicle with good tires I wouldn’t even worry about anything less than 6 inches this far into the winter season, but today was hard. I’m not patting myself on the back here, because if I would have put good tires on the car in the first place I wouldn’t have been in this position, but isn’t that most of what we do in EMS? We end up using our mental prowess to clean up other people’s messes caused by their lack of planning all the time. Today wasn’t much different. The amount of mental power and concentration needed to keep a car moving forward safely in snow-covered conditions is actually quite staggering when you think of it. You have to make quick observations of rapidly evolving conditions, surmise what you think the presentation of the road surface means to vehicle’s path of travel using your limited observations paired with your past experience and knowledge, and come up with a near simultaneous decision on how to handle the situation ahead of you. If you find yourself to be wrong, based upon the car not reacting the way you want it to, you have to instantaneously correct the situation while adjusting for the conditions ahead… or crash.

Now picture yourself managing a challenging patient presentation, one requiring a handful of pharmacological and physical interventions. You’re pretty much doing the same thing as driving in snow. Just like playing a game of chess, you have to be “thinking a few moves ahead” in order to keep up with what the patient’s physiology is going to throw at you. Do you have a fall victim with a broken hip in need of pain control? Did you think that they’re possibly going to drop their blood pressure with a dose of morphine? Well then you better be ready to give fluid to bump it back up to acceptable levels. However, what if you’re treating a CHF patient that would suffer further from the added fluid? What if they were a patient with Chronic Renal Failure? Would that affect your initial dose of morphine based upon the unknown factor of untoward hypotension? In my Northern system, I’d choose to use Fentanyl over Morphine in that case because of the lessened risk of hypotension, but in my Southern system I’d just have to start with a lower dose of Morphine and slowly titrate to an acceptable level of pain control once I gauged the patient’s response to the med.

How about a patient with a large anteriolateral MI? Their Left Ventricular function is soon to be compromised if not treated in a cath-lab. You need to increase blood flow to the Left Ventricle and decrease overall cardiac work by decreasing afterload with use of nitrates, but that’s going to decrease their cardiac output and blood pressure by decreasing their preload as well. You need to stabilize the infarct as best as possible while maintaining the patient’s hemodynamic state, and you may need to consider supporting their left ventricular function with the use of a vasopressor such as dopamine to treat possible cardiogenic shock. In this case, careful observation of the patient’s presentation and all information available to you is of paramount importance in order to make the minute treatment decisions necessary for your patient’s best possible outcome.

It all comes down to “Mental Quickness” or having the mental prowess and state needed to rapidly intake complex information, process it against your knowledge base, and then make reasonable decisions on a course of action in a very short period of time. We call people who are good at this “Quick Witted” and it applies to myriad situations in daily life. People who are good at this are usually funny, are quick to react to new situations, handle change fairly well, and make darn good EMS providers. I practice by trying to have a joke ready for any situation… so you could also call a person who’s mentally quick a “smart ass”.

You can practice your skills at being mentally quick the same way I do. Use humor and try to make good comebacks to the hooks and barbs that your coworkers and friends throw at you. When we’re sitting around busting each other’s chops… we’re actually practicing our EMS skills, right?

Think about it. Exercise your mind through reading, learning new things, and trying to come up with new ways to think of existing information. You’ll be funnier, more popular, will be able to knock your buddies down a peg better, and will improve your patient care.

Care to Share My Stuff?? C'mon, Go ahead.
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • MySpace
  • Twitter
  • Technorati

Are We the Gatekeepers to the Emergency Healthcare System? – EMS 2.0

Comments

Did I do good?

The Chronicles of EMS, if you’re living under a rock and you haven’t heard, is a cooperative effort between the Great Filmmaker Thaddeus Setla (EMSmedia.tv), the Remarkably Strong Paramedic Mark Glencourse (Medic999), and the “Ruggedly Handsome” firefighter/paramedic Justin Schorr (The Happy Medic). Their cooperative venture has taught me things that I’ve put to use in my own EMS practice that I believe have improved my care. Mark showed me the UK’s “Front Loaded” model and Justin has been talking about EMS providers being a gatekeeper to the emergency healthcare system. It’s a powerful collaboration. (Be sure to follow #CoEMS on twitter and become a fan of Chronicles of EMS on Facebook as well)

So here’s an example of what I mean. I can talk about this now because it’s been long enough that I can sufficiently muddle any possible trace back to the patient and fulfill any patient confidentiality concerns. I work in two very diverse service areas and cover approximately 35 different skilled nursing facilities at any one time. So in the time since the Chronicles of EMS has come out I’ve transported umpteen-hundred patients from those facilities and the patient I’m writing about could be any of those umpteen hundred. So there’s no way to violate confidentiality, Mmmm ‘Kay? 

Anyway, some time ago I was dispatched as the ALS response to backup a BLS ambulance for the “unresponsive” patient at a skilled nursing facility. I arrived a few seconds after the ambulance did and carried my drug bag and EKG/Defib into the facility with the ambulance crew following close behind with their jump kit, the cot, and a backboard. After a few seconds in the facility, a staff member directed me to the Physical Therapy area of the facility which was a bit of a walk. When I got there, I saw three other staff members huddled around an elderly female patient who was seated in a reclining chair.

The staff members were fairly excited about the situation, as was the patient, who was very much conscious and alert. The story everyone told me at once was that the patient had finished her physical therapy session on her upper body to strengthen her shoulders and had been sat in the chair by the PT Assistant to rest. After a few minutes, the PT asst. came to check on the patient and found her unresponsive to verbal stimuli, by which I mean that the patient would not awake when spoken to. The PT asst. called the facility’s emergency response team and another staff member activated 911. When one of the nurses arrived, the patient awoke to a sternal rub and was quite surprised to be the subject of so much attention. She had been fully alert and cognitive since that time and when I asked her she denied any chief complaint other than being understandably emotional about the situation.

As I do with every patient after I rule out any immediate life threats I moved into a more detailed assessment. My lady here had skin that was Pink, Warm, and dry. Her pupils were PERRL and her Cincinatti Pre-hospital stroke scale was negative. Her Lungs were clear, her abdomen was soft and non-tender with normoactive bowel sounds, and her extremities were warm and had good pulses, motor, and sensation. Her blood glucose was well within limits, and so were all of her vital signs. All of my other assessment findings were not indicative of any acute abnormalities other than a complaint of slight shoulder pain and weakness which could have been indicative of either an acute MI or of a rigorous PT session. So, to be even more thorough, I hooked her up to my 5-lead EKG which showed normal sinus rhythm with some peaked T-waves. I then ran a 12-lead EKG which was admittedly probably better than mine is.

I asked the nurse “Has she had a potassium level drawn recently?” She looked through the patient’s chart and found out that the patient in fact had been tested for that two days prior and had been found to have a slightly elevated serum potassium level. Since they had been active witnesses to my assessment we agreed that other than for perhaps a bit too much potassium there was little chance of anything being wrong with the patient.

Since we were here in the US and not in the UK like Mark, where he can treat and release (or “Respond, not Convey”) I asked the patient if she wanted us to take her to the hospital. She didn’t want to go and said that she just wanted to go back to bed. When the staff members weren’t completely convinced that we shouldn’t transport her, I suggested that they call the patient’s primary care physician to ask him what his wishes were. The nurse did so, and called from her cell phone in front of us. She did a good job of explaining in detail the events of the call and our collective assessment findings, I provided my interpretation of the 12-lead EKG and chimed in with my assessment findings that I use in my acute care practice.

For his part, the doctor was amenable to treating the patient at the facility and stated that he was comfortable with us not transporting the patient. He ordered a few stat labs and requested that we leave a copy of the 12-lead for the patient’s chart, which I was happy to do. Bottom line: The patient signed a refusal and was happy not to have to go to the hospital; The skilled-nursing-facility staff members were happy that the patient was in no immediate danger; and I was happy that we had made the best possible decision for the patient and that I wasn’t exposing her to unnecessary risk.

What happened here is exactly one of the things that I and others have been talking about with the EMS 2.0 movement: EMS people having the ability to make an educated and sound decision about the best possible healthcare options for our patients and not simply having to activate the full emergency healthcare system for every complaint. This case had every element of that and I believe that the patient being redirected through her normal primary healthcare pathway was a much better choice than taking her to the emergency room.

Heck, since there turned out to be no adverse results to this, and since the patient was probably on Medicare, I would surmise that I’ve ended up saving the taxpayers thousands of dollars in unneccesary costs… Huh? Can educating and empowering paramedics “save” the healthcare system in the US by creating a huge savings in the most expensive form of providing healthcare?

What do you think? Did I do good?

QGE5GE5AAH4W

Care to Share My Stuff?? C'mon, Go ahead.
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • MySpace
  • Twitter
  • Technorati

“CPR Theatre” – Pediatric Deaths, resuscitations, and futility

Comments

This post is a cooperative joint topic with two widely respected EMS bloggers, Steve Whitehead from Http://www.TheEMTspot.com and Greg Friese, from Http://www.EveryDayEMStips.com – Our topic is supposed to be on why it is that EMTs, Paramedics, and other healthcare providers will sometimes “go through the motions” and continue on with futile resuscitations with pediatric cardiac arrest victims. I’m sure that they will have very insightful posts on the topic, as they always do. Here’s my take.

————————————————————————–

Can someone say “emotionally charged”?

One of the truths about where I’m sitting right now is that I’m chained to a lot of potential responsibility. Today, like a lot of days I’m one of two paramedics on-duty in my service area and the next call is mine. No matter what the next call is, it is my responsibility to get up and answer that call… without regard the horror that fate may be sending me to bear witness to and intervene in. All medics have to accept this inherent part of the job. One of the worst of those possibilities is that it may be a call that involves the significant injury or illness to, or even the death of a child.

Mention the possibility of a child’s death to even the most cynical and seasoned of healthcare providers and you will send a very cold chill down their spine. It’s just horrible. For me, the blessedly rare times that I’ve lost a child have been sentinel events in my life, things that are often thought of but rarely spoken of… almost always spoken of only to comfort the pain of a colleague experiencing the same thing. The loss or suffering of a child just burns into our souls and leaves an indelible scar that only someone who has experienced it can have true empathy for.

And I for one, wish that I didn’t have the empathy that I have for it.

Heaven forbid that I ever have to be one of the parents with pleading eyes at one of those tragic and traumatic scenes. I just can’t imagine what they go through when I’ve said “I’m Sorry”. I can’t imagine their pain, and frankly I don’t want to. As a parent myself the thought is blocked from my conscious mind and relegated only to the deepest recesses of my subconscious fears. Losing an adult patient is one thing, as we humans come to know that our lives are fragile and that our price of admission is to be removed from this existence. It’s a knowledge that we get as we progress through life and gain the experiences, both good and bad, that make us who we are and will become. However, the terrible thought that one could be ripped from us in their age of innocence is an affront to everything that almost everyone holds dear… and it’s more than a lot of us can bear to make the last decision of a child’s life. Instead, we try. We try hard and we keep trying. We hold out hope against thought and fight on, sometimes against futility.

But in my mind, I think I know why it is… because no healthcare person wants to be the person who looks into those pleading eyes and says “I’m sorry”. That decision takes an enormous emotional toll upon the parents and family, of course… but also upon the EMT or Paramedic. It’s ultimately easier on us as EMS people, we reason, to fight on. To race headlong into futility and hold out hope that someone else won’t have to say “I’m sorry”. At least we won’t have to.

There are probably psychological studies out there that I haven’t read that deal with the issue of whether “CPR Theatre” is harmful or helpful to the long-term well being of the surviving family.  These studies are probably well-researched. I took a class once that told me that it was better for family members to be in the resuscitation room inside of a hospital to witness the events as healthcare people try to save their loved ones… and I can understand that I guess. Perhaps it is better to witness that “everything possible was done” for your departed loved one. I don’t know.

As healthcare providers, it is our sworn duty to alleviate suffering as best we can using the tools at our disposal. I, like most of my colleagues, realize that the secondary and tertiary patients that we treat are the family members and their grief reactions to the tragic circumstances that resulted in their calling us. I am reasonably comfortable handling their grief reactions and sadness when an adult passes on scene but I am humbly inadequate to be of much comfort to a parent that has just lost their child no matter how I might try.

My guess that futile CPR theatre can be explained as being more for the parents and families of departed children than it is for the slight chance that we might have missed something. We make the effort in the name of showing to the family members that “everything possible” was indeed done, up to and including running their child lights and sirens to a hospital. I’ll even admit that in the back of the ambulance while I’ve done this, I’ve prayed right along with the family that just perhaps this once we would have a miracle. Never once has it happened.

Here’s a mea culpa for you, even though every time I’ve gone through the motions I’ve said it was for the family…  It may really have been for my own benefit as I’ve stated it could be above. I am a paramedic and I’ve seen my share of pain, but I don’t think that I can look a parent in the eyes and say “I’m sorry” ever again. I just don’t want to and as I write this, I can’t imagine that I could do that and then come back and look the guy in the mirror in the eyes without wondering if maybe this time would’ve been the miracle. I am probably selfish for this practice… but is that wrong?

From a completely actuarial perspective, no futile resuscitation should be performed due to safety concerns and the unnecessary costs involved. I agree that with adults, transporting cardiac arrest victims is probably deadly. I also understand that no ambulance should risk a lights-and-sirens trip to transport a body to the emergency room. However, I am not an actuary. In those cases I’m a witness to horrible emotional pain and I want someone else to be the one who says “I’m sorry”. It’s human nature, perhaps.

In my career, I have told parents “I’m sorry, there’s nothing I can do” in cases where it was blatantly obvious that the child was long beyond hope of any intervention. I’ve done it more than once and I can see the places where I’ve done it in my mind to this day. Sometimes it’s completely obvious that there is indeed nothing that anyone can do. However, occasionally I have indeed known this and just done it anyway. Perhaps it’s completely subjective. Perhaps it was my level of experience and intuition that guided me at the times I’ve made the decision. I’ll tell you this, it certainly wasn’t a decision made from the pages of a textbook.

I don’t have the answers to this. But I do want to go home and hug my kid. My only advice to the EMS people out there is to realize that we’re all human, and that all you have to do is your best. Be compassionate, and use your best judgment. For that’s all we can ever do.

For more on this powerful topic for EMS, head over to Greg Friese’s page and also to Steve Whitehead’s page. You also may want to read “Splashed Sadness – A look at Negative Emotions in EMS” where I further explore the sad side of EMS and our reactions to it.

Care to Share My Stuff?? C'mon, Go ahead.
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • MySpace
  • Twitter
  • Technorati

The Paramedic Intercept – Rural EMS

Comments

It may shock some of my more urban readers out there, but not everywhere is a city.

Why did I say that? It’s because there’s not much talk out there regarding rural EMS. I live rural EMS and I believe that someone who calls 911 in a rural area deserves just as good of service as someone who lives in the city. To further my goal of increasing the dialogue, I’m writing about some of the issues facing rural EMS and the techniques that we use. Hopefully it’s educational.

Here’s the first part in my series on Rural EMS: The ALS Intercept:

Not every 911 call for an ambulance brings forth a paramedic-staffed Advanced Life Support ambulance. There’s a lot of ground in this nation covered by dedicated volunteer EMT-Basics that answer the call for their communities day-in and day-out. In fact, I got my start at one of these all-volunteer 911 EMT-Basic squads. We covered 275sq miles of sparsely populated terrain in the rural Midwest and ran about 200 or so calls for service per year. I have to say that it made me a very good basic, because there wasn’t any back-up for our BLS skills. However the patient presented, they got treated with the best that our Basic Life Support ambulance had to offer.

Of course, back then we had an ace in the hole. The big-city hospitals that were 45 minutes away at a minimum laid in the service area of ambulances with paramedics in them that could be called to head out our way and meet up with us for an “ALS intercept”. It still happens that way in a lot of communities, in fact, I ride around in an “interceptor” while at one of my jobs, which is an SUV with lights, sirens, and a full complement of ALS gear in it. Working out of that vehicle I respond first-due in our own jurisdiction and upon call for some of the surrounding communities. We meet up either on scene or enroute, and I hop in to dazzle the crew with a stunning display of ALS-sy goodness.

I have to tell you, I remember that from the perspective of an EMT-basic racing to the meet-up point with an “Oh-My-God” critical patient, having the paramedic jump on board was such a feeling of relief. Now, from the perspective of the paramedic who jumps in, it’s sometimes a bit of a pucker factor… because now you’re working with an unfamiliar audience watching your every move.

ALS intercepts are a great tool in the arsenal of rural EMS systems. There are a lot of small communities out there that do not have the capabilities to staff and support full paramedic ambulances. Even if they have the money to pay for all of the equipment and training needed for paramedics, they may not have the call volume needed to keep the paramedics busy and their skills sharp. That’s why consolidating the paramedics and sharing them between multiple services makes sense to me. The community volunteers respond as an initial stabilization, and a faster, more mobile unit runs out to meet them with higher skills. It’s a truly tiered response system.

Rural paramedicine and rural EMS take a different mentality than does urban EMS. For instance, the distance that we must cover mandates long response times. At my previous all-BLS service, we covered the 275sq mile 911 area out of one station. We had under 5000 people in that jurisdiction and that made staffing more than one ambulance infeasible. To cover the gap, we had outfitted volunteer EMT-Bs as “Satellite” First Responders to augment the response. It worked… if they were home or in the area.  Nonetheless, the response times went up to and over 30 minutes in the most remote areas. “Call Early” and “Call First” were necessary philosophies for the community. In addition, the longer transport times made necessary some long protocols that had lots of tools in them to keep the patients stable for the long time we were with them.

Today, I respond to my calls with some of the most advanced EMS protocols that I know of in the region. For example our service and our resource hospital is committed to meeting the AHA’s goal of a 90minute symptom onset-to-balloon time for STEMIs (ST segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction or, the classic heart attack) this requires either ground-bypassing the closest community hospital ER by almost an hour to make it to a hospital equipped with a cath-lab. Most urban services that I’ve worked for carried Nitroglycerine, Aspirin, and Morphine for these cases. For our rural protocols, we add Nitro Paste, a bolus of Heparin, and IV Metoprolol. We also carry transport ventilators on the trucks to free-up a pair of hands from bagging during the long transports with minimal personnel. It takes a strong and independent paramedic to be able to handle anything that’s thrown at them as a single medic. It takes a very strong an independent medic to handle it with an unfamiliar team of EMT-Basics in unfamiliar circumstances.

The relationship between the ALS provider and the EMT-Basic services that they support must be strong in order to be effective. There has to be a high-level of trust between both organizations and the providers working within them to keep the service level high. Holding joint trainings and understanding that everyone has a role within the continuum of patient-care is necessary. Dispatch protocols that pre-deploy ALS resources make a difference as well and take the responsibility off of the BLS provider to make the decision on whether the ALS response is necessary. I personally subscribe to the idea that it is good to be proactive with ALS dispatch protocols and in addition to sending ALS to the obvious complaints, such as Unresponsive patients, Chest pains, and difficulty breathing calls; it is also a good idea to send them ALS to non-specific dispatches such as the unknown medical. BLS providers that arrive first can always cancel the responding ALS if they determine that they’re truly not needed.

And always, always, always… the ALS and BLS providers must check their egos at the door and realize that what’s best for the patient is the most important consideration.

The ALS intercept is a great tool that extends the reach of paramedics into areas where we can’t be effectively based from. It takes work, but it’s good for our patients and our communities. Rural EMS takes different strategies, and this is a good one.

What are your thoughts on this?

Care to Share My Stuff?? C'mon, Go ahead.
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • MySpace
  • Twitter
  • Technorati

Paramedics Providing Physicals? Decreasing Healthcare Costs and Improving Care – EMS 2.0

Comments

Sitting down at your station one night finishing paperwork, you’re startled from your daydreaming by a knock at the door. You get up, and answer it to find one of the off-duty firemen from the town standing there at the door. He looks like heck warmed-over. He’s pale, sweaty, and his respiratory rate is elevated. He says He’s “Glad it’s you on tonight” and that he feels worse than he looks. He asks if you can “Check him out” since you’re “all medical and stuff”.

Treating this like a walk-in medical call, you help the guy walk into the back of the ambulance and have him sit on the bench seat. Your fire and EMS departments aren’t connected so you’re not really on a first name basis with the guy, but you know him from sight and know him from seeing him around the town on calls and social things and such. He just looks sick, he says that he’s having a bit of trouble breathing and that he feels like he’s freezing one minute and hot the next. He also says that he’s been coughing up “all kinds of stuff” for the last few days.

Putting on your best caring EMS provider face, you begin your assessment. He’s a 26yo Male patient in generally good health and with good appearance other than for right now. His skin is very warm and moist to the touch and he seems to have a fever. His pulse is rapid and bounding at around 120bpm, but that decreases after a few minutes of rest as does his respirations. He states that for the last few days he’s been sick. It started with a sore throat and some sinus gook and now has “gotten into his chest”. You listen to his lungs and hear some diminished sounds in the bases bilaterally with diffuse rhonchi throughout.  His abdomen is soft and non-tender but says that he’s had some mild bouts of diarrhea. He complains of exertional dyspnea and his BP is way high at 184/98. His temperature is 101.4 degrees F taken at the tympanic membrane.

So based upon the assessment, you’re thinking that he’s got a respiratory infection, probably bronchitis. Just because you can, you run a 12-lead EKG which is otherwise normal other than for the sinus tachycardia. His pulse ox is 94% on room air. He says that he doesn’t have insurance and that he can’t afford the emergency room, but that he’s willing to pay for a visit to the urgent care doctor if you think he should go in.

Now, faced with the above, as I have been a few times in my career, you have a few options here. You could do what we’re supposed to do by the book and recommend transport to the ER even though you know the guy’s condition probably isn’t life threatening right now. You could also tell him that you think that he may have a respiratory infection and that while he should see the doctor as soon as he can, that he probably doesn’t need the emergency room.

(Remember, we’re talking about today’s protocols, not the ones I want that I posted in “The Current US Economy and EMS – An In-depth look at how this mess will affect 911 in your community”)

Usually, I choose to tell my buddies that they should consult their regular doctors or go to an urgent care clinic instead of going to the ER. Sure, in cases where I thought they had a life threat or needed immediate care above the level of the local Urgent Care, I’ve transported my friends a few times. However, most of the time I give them my assessment findings written down on a piece of paper, hand them a copy of their EKG if I took one, and send them on their way to the non-ER doctor.

The last time I did this, it hit me: I’m conducting a physical when I do this. Sure, in the above case and in the cases where I’ve done this before it is a complaint-based assessment, but a patient examination is a physical exam. When I write my assessment findings on a sheet to give to the doctor, I’m writing them on a physical examination form. While my assessment isn’t as in depth as that of a physician, it certainly is better than not being examined, and a paramedic has specific training in detecting disease processes that may go undetected by a patient and their families.

(Note: In all of the cases where I did not transport the patient to the hospital, I did obtain a proper refusal form after educating the patient about their condition as best I could. They made the decision, not me.)

If you type “Annual Physical Exam” into Google, you’ll see quite a few articles about the topic, including a study published in the Archives of Internal Medicine and this article published in US News and World Report basically, they say that Preventative Health Exams account for approximately 8.0% of all ambulatory care visits costing approximately $7.8 billion in health care costs. They also say that the cost of providing these services may outweigh the benefits of receiving them. In 2005, a survey of 800 Primary Care Physicians reported that 65% of them recommended an annual physical, that 74% felt that it improved early detection of illness, and that 94% felt that it improved patient-physician relationships, there is currently “No major North-American clinical medical association” that “currently recommends that health adults get a physical each year.”

So there’s a debate being held in healthcare circles. On one hand, patients probably perceive a benefit to the annual physical exam, and certainly the people who have disease processes detected and stopped with early intervention see a very tangible benefit. There are also a majority of physicians that when questioned individually state that they see a benefit to the exam. However, there is also the fact that the costs probably outweigh the benefit of the exam, even though “preventative care” is batted about in the current healthcare debate quite a bit and most organizations and physicians recommend health screenings for specific disease processes that benefit most from early detection.

My opinion is that when the cost outweighs a benefit, there is the choice to either forgo the benefit or find a way to decrease the cost. I am suggesting that we can decrease the cost to the overall healthcare system as well as increase the availability of preventive care by introducing paramedics into the debate. I believe that paramedics could provide a more than adequate annual physical examination in most cases for a large subset of the population. In fact, most of us probably already do without thinking about it. The articles state that 80% of preventive health care is provided within the context of complaint-based ambulatory care visits. I would say that paramedics in ambulances provide this care to the rest of the population. I’d also say that we provide a lot more patient education on chronic health issues to a larger segment of the underserved population than any other healthcare provider. Think about it, how many times have you personally attended to a patient who called you for a complaint such as a “fall” and upon assessment found evidence of an undiagnosed chronic condition? I have, and I like to think that with a thorough assessment on every patient, I can improve their overall health more so than just helping them with their current complaint.

To implement this plan, I would think that functionally, paramedic training already gives us a strong background to provide a detailed physical exam. We would, however, have to undergo more intensive training in examination skills and pathophysiology to be able to detect subtle underlying signs and symptoms of disease processes, mental health and substance abuse issues, and sexual health problems. I would envision that there would be a detailed and formalized set of procedures, tests, and paperwork that would be completed in full that should be pre-agreed upon with the Primary Care Physicians in an ambulance service’s wider sphere of influence. Tests such as a random fingerstick glucose, a monitor strip, and a baseline 12-lead EKG could be obtained as well as a review of the patient’s social and other risk-factors. These findings would then be forwarded to the patient’s personal physician, or could be given to the patient to bring to a physician of their choosing.

This is an easily implemented service that we could be providing our communities with tomorrow with the right planning. The chance to improve the overall health of our patients exists coupled with a chance to decrease overall healthcare costs. It’s also another potential revenue source for ambulance services, which is sorely needed in order to implement EMS 2.0 and improve the EMS profession for tomorrow. Imagine the revenue boost to your service’s and your bottom line if every crew started performing ten physicals a day for $50 a pop. It’s a bargain for the patient, but would be a boon for us.

Paramedics are underutilized for our skill sets and education, this is a way that we can further contribute to the health of our communities while improving our profession overall.

References:

US News and World ReportDo You Actually Need a Physical Exam”http://health.usnews.com/articles/health/2007/09/24/do-you-actually-need-a-physical-exam.html

Archives of Internal Medicine “Preventive Health Examinations and Preventive Gynecological Examinations in the United States” – http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/167/17/1876

Care to Share My Stuff?? C'mon, Go ahead.
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • MySpace
  • Twitter
  • Technorati

Guest Post – An Open Letter to Wisconsin Physicians Concerning Do-Not-Resucitate Orders

Comments

This is a guest post written by a local paramedic that has an important message to get out about Physician involvement with Do-Not-Resuscitate (DNR) Orders. I’ve included it in its entirety. It’s an important issue. It takes such an emotional toll on the EMS providers and the families of our patients. Please share this with your colleagues and loved ones.

———————————————————–

An open letter to the Physicians of Wisconsin:

“Medic 1, Engine 7 respond to 123 Anystreet for a male unresponsive. Time out 21:19.” 

This simple statement spoken by a dispatcher starts a series of events that will place an EMS crew in a moral dilemma, a family in a confused and angry state, and a personal physician sitting at home, unaffected.  As the responding EMTs and Paramedics enter the home in response to this call, they see an elderly female cradling an elderly male in her arms. She is sobbing and distraught.  The elderly female holds in her hands the lifeless body of her life long partner and soul mate who seems to have finally given up his long suffering in this world.  The lead EMT quickly approaches the patient and finds that the patient is in cardiac arrest.  The female states that she always knew that he would die in her arms.  She states how long and difficult these last months have been with his terminal illness creeping into their lives and stealing her husband away.  The Lead EMT asks if the patient has a DNR (Do Not Resuscitate) order. The wife states that he does.  A quick check of wrists and ankles does not produce the state approved DNR bracelet.  The EMT’s crew stares at Lead EMT looking for direction.  They know that unless there is a valid DNR bracelet on his wrist they must start CPR and perform life saving measures.  The Lead EMT knows that the clock is quickly winding down, they must act soon.  She asks the spouse again about the DNR and where it might be in the house.  The spouse states that there is a copy of the DNR at the hospital.  She states that she filled it out at the months ago at the doctor’s office.  The spouse says, “I never got a bracelet.  The doctor knows that he didn’t want anything does, can’t you call him?”

Meanwhile, a county away, a physician sits at his desk, dictating the notes of the day.  He is completely unaware of the drama that is unfolding in the darkness of night and the darkness that is enveloping one spouse’s life.  This physician has practiced medicine for years, graduating medical school in the early 1960’s.  He has been kind, caring, and concerned for every patient he has seen and is highly regarded within the medical community.  When he first started in medicine, ambulances were simply Cadillac station wagons that whisked through the night.  They moved the sick and injured from point to point without offering much more than a fast ride.  Over the decades the rules changed, medical advances occurred, and now an ambulance is a rolling emergency department with full advanced life support abilities.  Unfortunately, unless a physician takes an interest in EMS this change has occurred without notice.

The lead EMT removes the patient from his spouse’s arms.  They move him to the floor and start CPR.  The crew has no choice, they have no valid DNR order and they have been summoned by a 911 call from the spouse.  The spouse screams at and pleads with the crew to stop, she doesn’t understand why this is happening.  Her husband has filled out papers; they have them on file at the hospital.  She thought this wouldn’t happen.  The spouse watches as I.V.’s are started, defibrillator pads applied, and an endotracheal tube is placed into the airway of her spouse.  The spouse is now frantic.  This was never supposed to happen.  Why aren’t the EMT listening to her? She knows what her husband wanted, they were together for over 50 years.  Medications are now being given and the EMS crew is trying to coax a pulse out of a tired heart.  The crew shoots looks at each other questioning what is right and wrong.

The lack of a DNR order puts EMS crews in a terrible moral and ethical dilemma.  They must proceed as the law states; but their hearts are heavy and they are unsure if they are truly doing the best for the patient or the family.  They sat in on the trainings years ago about the DNR bracelet.  The instructors said it would eliminate these situations, patients would speak to their personal physicians, sign all the necessary forms, and then the patient would be issued a DNR bracelet that would clearly state the patient’s wishes.  Yet time and time again, this scenario repeats itself and each time the frustration grows.

After 45 minutes of CPR and three rounds of ACLS medication, medical control is contacted.  The ED physician is advised of the situation and advises the crew to terminate all efforts.  The crew cleans up and a mournful wife sits by her husband’s side again, holding his hand.  This is where she wanted to be all along, just holding his hand and looking for support in this darkest time in her life.  Instead, she had to witness the brutality of a full ACLS code.  The ribs breaking, the I.V.’s being placed, the monitor screaming out orders in its electronic voice.   The peaceful, honorable death she had hoped for has been taken from her, she will now have the visions of CPR and strangers doing procedures to her husband that neither of them ever wanted.  These are events that we can never go back in time and change.

Our physician is now walking to his car.  Rattling through his pocket looking for keys that he can’t seem to find.  He will receive a call later tonight from the county coroner explaining what has happened.  He will be honestly horrified to hear of the efforts by the EMS unit and will wonder why this has happened.  Ironically, he doesn’t know that he set these events in motion years ago by not securing a DNR order for his patient that EMS crews are able to honor.

“Medic 1 and Engine 7 are clear, no transport, coroner on scene.”  This will be another long ride back to the fire house.  Emotions are running high, the crew is upset.  They can’t figure what is making them angrier, the fact that this happened or the fact they know it will happen again.  The cycle continues.

I would ask that each primary care physician look into the laws as they apply to DNR orders and EMS providers in the State of Wisconsin.  We do not have the luxury of time.  We must make decisions within seconds.  We NEED the DNR bracelet.  All we need to know is “yes or no” to CPR.  We have NO time to read through long winded orders or other legal documents.  This is a problem that we must fix and fix fast. You have the power to fix this. Please do so.

Respectfully,

Todd A. Bluhm, Paramedic

Care to Share My Stuff?? C'mon, Go ahead.
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • MySpace
  • Twitter
  • Technorati

EMS 2.0 & EMS Ethics – How far would you go?

Comments

Throughout my EMS career I’ve heard a lot of the same complaints from paramedics that seem to be endemic within the system. One of these is the quality of physician medical direction and whether or not theirs is considered “Progressive” or “Permissive” by the EMTs and Paramedics that work within the protocol system. Some systems seem almost regressive. They don’t seem to show any trust in the providers that work within the protocols and end up being putting forth “Mother-May-I” protocols that disallow aggressive field treatment and require hand holding over the radio or cell phone to a base station. Others, are fairly progressive and allow quite a bit of treatment to be provided in the field.

However, even in the more progressive of the systems out there the medics always tend to have their own personal “wish list” of things that they’d like to be permitted to do. I currently work in the most progressive protocol system I’ve ever worked in and yet there are a few things that I would like to be allowed to do further than I can do now. Toradol for pain control, and the inclusion of a paralytic to our Medication Assisted Intubation protocols would be examples.

However, there begs a question here that I haven’t seen explored before: What if this was reversed?

Say tomorrow you head on into work and get there to hear the news that your medical director up and left for Tahiti with a new love interest with whom he or she will be very happy. Incidentally, you’ve now got a new medical director that just graduated medical school after spending 10 years as a field paramedic. There’s a “Get to Know Me” meeting scheduled in a half hour,

In the meeting the new medical director, who emphatically insists that you call him “Dr. Pat”, and then changes it to “Just Pat” outlines the new protocols that you will be functioning under starting as soon as you all can get through the trainings and meetings that are scheduled. These protocols are amazing. For example, your protocols for treatment of severe asthma used to include just oxygen, nebulized albuterol, and subcutaneous epinephrine. Now you’ll be giving Albuterol mixed with atrovent for your nebulizers, Epi 1:1000 sub-q or brethine (terbutaline) sub-q, epi 1:10000 IV for severe cases, Solu-Medrol (an injectable steroid), and Magnesium Sulfate infusions for refractory cases. For pain control, you used to have to call for orders to give Morphine. Now you give Morphine in 2mg increments titrated to effect up to 20mg if the blood pressure is over 100mmhg systolic, Fentanyl 50mcg – 200mcg, Toradol 60mg IM, and/or Nitronox (Inhaled Nitrous Oxide). The protocols are really advanced and have at least twenty new medications, some of which you’ve never even heard of.

Soon after you start reading the new protocols you start noticing things that frankly, scare you a bit. Never mind the fact that you don’t know how you’re going to calculate amiodarone drips and use propofol for conscious sedation, you’re frankly scared that the protocol system directs you to perform emergent C-Sections to save a viable fetus in cases of limb presentations in pregnancy. Really?

Mannitol and induced hypothermia for head injuries? Wow. You also now have needle crics, surgical crics, Needle decompression of the chest, pericardiocentesis, retrograde intubation, and what are those words? Thoracostomy (Chest Tubes)?? Thoracotomy? Holy crap! There’s almost nothing you can’t do! 

After the meeting you head out on the streets with your partner. You’re honestly feeling a little nostalgic for the days when your Tahiti-bound regressive medical director wouldn’t let you be responsible for hardly anything. It’s completely opposite now. You’ve gone from one extreme to the other. There’s nothing that you’ve ever thought of doing in the field that you can’t do anymore.

On one hand this would be very exciting for me (and yes, I went a little overboard with plausible treatment modalities to make a point here) but on the other hand, I’d have to ask the question:

Where would be the line where progressive treatment protocols cross the line? When would be the point where paramedics are given too much responsibility for complex invasive treatments?

I’ve never seen the case I’m describing. I love working under a progressive and liberal protocol system. However, in a meeting the other day when the possibility of administering thrombolytics for refractory ventricular fibrillation in cardiac arrest came up I had a thought that I’d never had before:

“I don’t get paid enough to have that much responsibility. I take on a lot of liability and have to put in a lot of uncompensated education time for the meager wage that I get paid now… how much is that going to have to increase for no more money?”

I don’t want to think that way, and I’d have to question the dedication of any paramedic in any of the protocol systems that I’ve examined that would say no to being able to provide potentially lifesaving treatments to their patients. I can’t imagine refusing to do something because I didn’t think that I was compensated enough to take on the responsibility of doing it. I’d be happy to sit through the required education, but I doubt that they would increase the compensation of the medics in the above example.

Could it happen? Has it happened? Will it happen as treatments progress and professional responsibility increases? I’ll firmly say that I’m nowhere near adequately compensated for the responsibility I have today. Where would I be if the above scenario happened to me tomorrow?

EMS 2.0 needs to seek out and find answers to the questions that we haven’t asked yet just as much as we need to find answers to the questions we’ve been struggling with for years.

What do you think?

Care to Share My Stuff?? C'mon, Go ahead.
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • MySpace
  • Twitter
  • Technorati

Advances in Resuscitation – CCR If you’re not doing it now, you will be

Comments

Visitors to my old blog probably know that at my ambulance service we tend to bring back a lot of codes. I talk about it a lot. Back in 2004 our medical director, Dr. Michael Kellum, got us involved in a “Demonstration Project” to bring Continuous Compression CPR or Cardiocerebral resuscitation to a rural area. Since that time, the results have been more than dramatic. Depending on what statistics you look at, we may be “Saving” almost 50% of witnessed arrests found to be in ventricular fibrillation.

It’s all explained at Http://www.callandpump.org But if you want to go right to the whitepaper that explains what we do, why we do it, and how it’s done then you want to go here: http://callandpump.org/assets/Proposal_Current.pdf – This link is explains the demonstration project initiated by Dr. Kellum et al. in the two county area that I work in. This paper was published in 2004 at the beginning of the project.

This is a link to the results published in the Annals of Emergenc Medicine in 2008 – http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18374452?ordinalpos=2&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_DefaultReportPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum 

You may be interested in this part:

“RESULTS: In the 3 years preceding the change in protocol, there were 92 witnessed arrests with an initially shockable rhythm. Eighteen patients survived (20%) and 14 (15%) were neurologically intact. During the 3 years after implementation of the new protocol, there were 89 such patients. Forty-two (47%) survived and 35 (39%) were neurologically intact. CONCLUSION: In adult patients with a witnessed cardiac arrest and an initially shockable rhythm, implementation of an out-of-hospital treatment protocol based on the principles of cardiocerebral resuscitation was associated with a dramatic improvement in neurologically intact survival.”

This is good stuff. Remember, the above is only reflective of those included in the study, who are “Witnessed arrest(s) with an initially shockable rhythm”. Anecdotally, I’ve personally attended those that were not in a shockable rhythm and witnessed greater effectiveness as well.

Here’s the short version of our protocols for Witnessed V-Fib Arrest: (and for those of you who want more, email me at: proems1@yahoo.com and I will be happy to send you a copy of the protocols)

We follow an acronym called MCMAID in our resuscitation protocols, it stands for:

Metronome – We carry a metronome in our monitor/defibrillator bags that clicks out at 100 beats per minute. We are to compress at 100bpm. No more, no less. This metronome keeps us on rhythm and reminds us to be on the chest.

Compressions – 100 compressions per minute. Do not stop. Initially, we are to administer 200 compressions (2 minutes) before our first shock. We are to limit any interruptions in compressions absolutely as much as possible, charging our defibrillators while compressions are ongoing, and recognizing V-fib through the compressions if possible. Compress hard and deep, completely releasing tension on the chest upon recoil to maximize the compression and decompression of the chest.

Monitor – Place the monitor on the patient using fast patches. Do not stop the 200 compression cycles to determine the rhythm. Shock at max joules biphasic. If you can anticipate V-Fib, charge the defib during the compressions and only stop long enough to clear for the shock. Don’t check the pulse, get right back to compressions.

Airway – Initially, a BLS airway will be placed in the patient and a non-rebreather oxygen mask will be placed on the patient. If the airway must be controlled by more advanced means to protect and ensure a patent airway, now is the time to do so.

Intravenous Access – Most of the time, this is accomplished through the means of the Ez-IO drill that we carry and love. (See: Alternative Circulatory Access Strategies – Hi Ho IO) This can also be obtained through peripheral or EJ IV access.

Drugs – Epinephrine 1:10,000 1mg IVasopression 40 IU, Amiodarone 300mg, then Epinephrine 1:10,000 1mg q 3-5min. If refractory, we may give an additional 150mg Amiodarone IV.

To see the full MCMAID protocol (I put it up in a post) you can see it by clicking here.

Today Dr. Kellum came down again for our monthly training and let us know the latest breakthroughs and orders in the project. He is stressing the importance of End-Tidal CO2 (ETCO2) monitoring and states that no pulse check is necessary without a spontaneous increase in ETCO2. He expects every intubated (or combitubed) patient to have ETCO2 monitoring in place.

He also expects that we will monitor ETCO2 readings as a way to prove effectiveness of compressions. Rescuers who cannot get ETCO2 readings consistent with other personnel when providing compressions shouldn’t be doing compressions.

Rescuers should switch off compressions EVERY ONE MINUTE whenever possible. This is providing some fantastic results in preliminary trials.

He also stated that the effectiveness of the CCR protocols are showing a marked increase in refractory V-fib. He hinted that the protocols might soon show a need for thrombolytic use in treatment of refractory V-Fib.

Stay tuned folks, I am happy as heck to be included in this. I will bring updates, with permission, as many times as I get them.

Care to Share My Stuff?? C'mon, Go ahead.
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • MySpace
  • Twitter
  • Technorati

MCMAID Resuscitation Protocol

Comments

This post is a stub, and is a supplement to “Advances in Resuscitation – CCR, if you’re not doing it now you will be”

——————

EMERGENCY MEDICAL RESPONDER/EMT

A CODE COMMANDER should assign duties according to MCMAID prior to arrival

  • Establish that the patient is unresponsive, and not breathing normally
  • Rule out DNR status, dependent lividity, rigor mortis

First Priority: M-(metronome) Quality Chest Compressions

  • Turn on Metronome, ensuring a rate of 100/minute
  • Initiate 2 minutes of chest compressions, pediatric-follow AHA 2005 Guidelines

Second Priority: C-(compressions) Quality Chest Compressions

  • Assign two compressors switching every minute, checking each others quality
  • Depth should be at least 2 inches
  • The heal of the compressor’s hand should come off the chest, ensuring full recoil

Third Priority: M-(monitor) Defibrillate

  • AED, push analyze (pediatric patient >1 yr , use peds pads up to 8 yrs if available if not use adult pads)
  • Manual, charge max joules during CPR, analyzing for no more than 5 sec (EMT-I/P) – (pediatric 4 joules/kg)
  • Immediately resume 2 more minutes of compressions

Fourth Priority: A-(airway)

  • Oropharyngeal airway and 10 liters O2 via NRB mask
  • Check patency if chocking is suspected
  • No ventilations until after 3 cycles - (unless pediatric-follow AHA 2005 Guidelines)
  • CombiTube/ET after 3 cycles of compressions, unless 1st  rhythm is nonshockable, then as soon as possible, ventilate at 6/minute only enough volume to just make chest rise

 If ROSC, acquire 12-Lead EKG, ***ACUTE MI SUSPECTED*** see STEMI Guidelines.

Give a status report to the ambulance crew by radio ASAP and ensure ALS has been dispatched.

 AEMT

Fourth Priority: I-(IV) Establish venous access

  • Initiate IO 0.9% Normal Saline unless IV is assured and quick, run wide open (20ml/kg boluses for pediatric patients)
  • Consider second IV and chilling both for unresponsive ROSC. Refer to Therapeutic Hypothermia Procedure

 INTERMEDIATE

 Monitor basic rescuer interventions closely, ensure quality, uninterrupted chest compressions

Fifth Priority: D-(drugs) Proceed to ACLS resuscitation medications

  • Obtain venous access, if not already done
  • Epinephrine 1:10,000 1 mg IV/IO every other cycle of compressions (4 minutes)
  • Vasopressin 40 units IV/IO, repeat dose in 10 minutes if no ROSC
  • If multiple shocks have been given, Amiodarone (Cordarone) 300 mg IV/IO, followed by another 150 mg if still refractory (shocks being delivered)
  • After 3 cycles of compressions, (unless first rhythm in non shockable) place advanced airway without interrupting compressions and begin ventilations at 6/minute, using only the volume to just make the chest rise.
  • If initially non-shockable, Identify and correct reversible causes: The Five H’s and the Five T’s This applies mostly to PEA, but to a lesser extent, Asystole, as well.
  • If rate is <60, Atropine Sulfate 1 mg IV. Repeat every 3 – 5 min to a maximum of 3 mg

 “The Five H’s” (treatment orders are in parentheses)

  1. Hypovolemia (Infuse Normal Saline wide open)
  2. Hypoxia (Place an advanced airway and administer high-flow oxygen at a ventilation rate of 6/minute with only enough volume to make chest rise. [1])
  3. Hydrogen Ion, i.e. acidosis (Perform ventilation [1])
  4. Hyperkalemia [2]
    1. Give Calcium Chloride (10%) 1000mg IV over 2 – 5 minutes. May repeat X 1
    2. Give Sodium Bicarbonate (8.4%) 50 mEq IV
    3. Give Albuterol Sulfate 2.5 mg HHN may repeat X 1
  5. Hypokalemia (not treated in the field.)
  6. Hypothermia (See Hypothermia & Frostbite Guidelines)

“The Five T’s” (treatment orders are in parentheses)

  1. Tablets (See Toxic Exposure/Overdose Guidelines)
  2. Tamponade (EMT-P: Perform Pericardiocentesis)
  3. Tension pneumothorax (Perform needle decompression)
  4. Thrombosis, cardiac i.e. myocardial infarction (See Chest Pain Guidelines)
  5. Thrombosis, pulmonary i.e. pulmonary embolism (No specific pre-hospital treatment available)

Paramedic

 If there is ROSC, as seen as a sudden large increase in EtCO2 and/or patient movement

  • Give Amiodarone (Cordarone) 150 mg IV/IO over 10 minutes, if multiple shocks given
  • Reassess the need for airway devices
  • Maintain advanced airway, if the patient remains unconscious
  • If the patient wakes up, the airway may be removed. Use the procedures for removing advanced airway devices in the Respiratory Distress Guidelines.
  • Monitor patient’s EtCO2 and ventilate accordingly (12-20 per minute to maintain EtCO2 around 35 mmHg)
  • Maintain SBP >80 mmHg, Consider Dopamine Hydrochloride 10-20mcg/kg/minute IV infusion
  • Consider inducing hypothermia, See Therapeutic Hypothermic Guidelines
  • Consider RSI See Respiratory Distress Guidelines
  • If post-resuscitation 12-lead EKG shows STEMI refer to STEMI Guidelines
  • Contact Medical Control for the following:
    • To discuss termination of resuscitation in the absence of a valid Wisconsin DNR Bracelet
    • Additional medication orders

 FOOTNOTES:

 1. Do not hyperventilate during cardiac arrest, even if hypoxia and acidosis are suspected causes. Strictly follow the ventilation guidelines described above.

2. Suspect Hyperkalemia when patients with a history of chronic renal failure (dialysis patients) develop cardiac arrest. Pre-arrest history may include weakness, missed dialysis appointment(s), vomiting, concurrent illness, and T waves that are peaked and as large as the R wave.

—————————-

This post is a stub, and is a supplement to “Advances in Resuscitation – CCR, if you’re not doing it now you will be”

Care to Share My Stuff?? C'mon, Go ahead.
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • MySpace
  • Twitter
  • Technorati

Daily Training Topics 10/16/09

Comments

Just about every 24 hour shift that I work up in my Northern job I put together a little impromptu training session. It’s a way for me to address things that I think are important for the crews to refresh on as well as a way for me to read up on some things and make sure I remember the stuff I should know. I try to learn the latest things on the chosen topic with a bit of research before I present the class as well. It keeps me sharp, which is good.

Also, (and let’s talk about the important things here) it gives me a cheap and easy blog post which I like because I’m really trying to bump up my posting frequency with this Fancy New Blog and all that.

Today’s training topics were a refresher class on intravenous access as well as BLS Airway Management Skills. We have a good number of EMT-Basics, EMT-IV Techs (here in Wisconsin) and even an EMT-Intermediate ‘99 that are on-duty today. My partner and myself (incidentally, both named Chris) are the duty medics.

So, without further ado, here’s what I taught them. Remember, this was a BLS class, and is geared to newer providers.

- IV Skills: I didn’t do anything on my own here. One of the benefits of the EMS blogosphere is that I have a wealth of training information at my fingertips. A lot of the time, I’ll pop on over to see what Greg Friese is doing on Http://www.everydayEMStips.com – And if I’d like some in-depth EMS knowledge, I’ll head over to Http://paramedicine101.blogspot.com.

For this training, however, I took the tips laid out by Steve over at Http://www.theEMTspot.com – where he wrote “Six Techniques to Nail the IV Every Time” I put it up on the projector and wrote down the bullet points on the white board. (and I gave him the credit for the easy and valuable training both in the class and on here)

- BLS Airway Management knowledge:

For this one, I pulled out every airway and oxygenation management tool we carry in the truck, which in my service includes:

- The Oropharyngeal and Nasopharyngeal Airways

Do you know when to use one over the other? Here’s some tips. First, if the patient is unresponsive enough to take an oropharyngeal airway without triggering a massive gag reflex, the patient NEEDS an oropharyngeal airway. (or an ET tube/Combitube/King LT for that matter)

Nasopharyngeal airways are used for patients unresponsive enough to need an airway adjunct but that still have an intact gag reflex. DO NOT USE nasopharyngeal airways in cases of head or facial trauma. (Why? Because the nasopharynx is separated from the rest of the cranial vault by the Cribiform plate, which is a very thin piece of bone that can be fractured very easily with significant head trauma. If it is fractured, you run the risk of placing the nasopharyngeal airway – or the nasogastric tube for that matter – right into the cranial vault… which is bad. 

The oropharyngeal airway is measured from the corner of the mouth to the angle of the jaw. The Nasopharyngeal airway is measured from the nare (nasal opening) to the earlobe.

On a side note, do you know how to check for a gag reflex? My almost never-fail method is to use the eyes. If the patient is unresponsive, running your finger lightly through their eyelash should elicit a response (i.e. wiggling) if the patient has an intact gag reflex. Further, a variation on the theme is to lightly open their eyelids with your gloved fingers and lightly blow into their eye. Don’t do it hard, and certainly don’t blow hard or use any pressure with your fingers, but if a person isn’t unresponsive and can tolerate that without flinching… they aren’t human.

- The Combitube

Honestly, I’ve not had a good track record with the combitube. I prefer the King LT. (Sorry Happy)

- The Endotracheal Tube

For this part of the training I looked at the various parts of this procedure that an EMT-Basic might be asked to participate in, such as preoxygenation with a BVM before the procedure, setting up the equipment for the ALS provider before he/she needs it, choosing the various adjuncts to assist the ALS provider in confirming tube placement, and various methods to secure the tube.

- CPAP

This is a miracle treatment. CPAP, or Continuous Positive Airway Pressure has revolutionized the management of congestive heart failure and pulmonary edema. Every EMT should know how to use this, when to use this, and how to properly apply this wonderful thing.

- Non-Rebreather O2 mask, Nasal Cannula (Adult and Peds)

If you don’t know how to use this, you probably should.

- The Nebulizer set up (We use Albuterol (Proventil) and Ipatropium Bromide (Atrovent)

We covered the proper set-up of the nebulizer and the various differing ways that it can be employed. Sure, you can use the duckbill for the patient to hold, but you can also pull the reservoir bag off of a Nonrebreather mask, insert the nebulizer chamber where the bag went and you’ve got yourself a handy mask neb.

We also went over the proper way to connect the nebulizer to the Bag Valve Mask. Depending on your equipment this setup could vary. Ours did like 3 ways. Check yours.

- Bag Valve Masks of assorted sizes

Learn how to properly seal the masks, the proper ventilatory rate (8-10 per minute) and the proper size for each variation in patient population.

- A Pocket Mask

Haven’t used one of these in a while, have you?

- The Surgical and Needle Cric kits

The basics don’t need to know how to use these, but it’s good to practice. Three of us had to hold the student down to do it, but we got it in on the second try!

I’m really liking my new home.

Care to Share My Stuff?? C'mon, Go ahead.
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • MySpace
  • Twitter
  • Technorati

Scenarios. A lot of EMS, a little Einstein

Comments

A while back ago I had a kick where I did a scenario-based EMS ethics piece that took a look at a possible situation that could be faced by some Paramedics and asked readers what they would do in that case.

The response was pretty good. You should add your opinion here.

I use a lot of scenario based training for the EMS people that I teach. I teach a lot. Being the old, grizzled veteran that I am (shameless self plug but looking at the kids these days entering the profession sometimes I feel like shaking my fist at them, hiking my jeans up to my navel, and yelling at them to “Get off my lawn!”) I have the opportunity to mentor a lot of newer providers and precept a fair amount of students. During our slow periods, I find that giving the students an informal scenario helps them to step outside their thought processes and really think about what they would do when faced with a like situation.

I like it so much, that I even do it to myself. I’ve mentioned that I come up with most, if not all of my blogging ideas when doing other, mindless tasks. A great deal of my post ideas come while driving. I allow my mind to wander to imaginary concepts and ideas. Since I’m so immersed in EMS on a daily basis, a lot of those thoughts go right back to EMS, and “what if” scenarios come into my mind. Some of them are about patients that I’ve had, the “what if this had happened” kind of questions. Others are completely random scenarios that I wonder what I would do if I happen to be faced with the situation.

Einstein conducted what he called “Thought Experiments” to assess theories that he could not experiment with in a laboratory. One of the ones that I’m most familiar with is his “Flashlight on a Train” thought experiment. In this well documented case, he hypothesized that the speed of light was a constant and was not affected by outside forces. He imagined himself on a long, open railroad train with himself standing at the caboose, or end car of the train. He imagined shining a powerful flashlight from the rear of the train through the cars to the front engine. Using some logic that I am not familiar with because I’m no Einstein, he was able to theorize that the light from the flashlight would hit the train’s engine at the same time and that the light would travel at the same speed no matter how fast the train, and therefore the light source, was travelling. Unlike a missile fired from a jet plane that’s speed would be affected by the speed of the plane that fired it.

So how do Einstein’s thought experiments connect to EMS?

I equate the personal scenarios that I think of and the scenarios that I use to keep my students thinking outside the box to Einstein’s thought experiments. There are things in EMS that we do not do very often. Skills like synchronized cardioversion, surgical airways, and complicated drug administrations aren’t everyday things. Neither are difficult patient presentation with complex layers of comorbid conditions. These are high-risk, low frequency events that trial lawyers dream about. When you need to perform these tasks or think around a list of contraindications when your patient needs action now, having thought about them prior to having to perform is lifesaving.

One of the things I hear the most from paramedics and EMTs is how they run though a list of possible scenarios, patient presentations, and treatment modalities in their heads when dispatched to what sounds like a particularly nasty call. I do that sometimes too, although less now than I used to. Spending the time thinking about these things when you have the time to really ponder the issues is very beneficial and even fun… if you’re an EMS geek like me.

So next time you and your partner are bored sitting in your parking lot waiting for the next call, toss around a few “way out” scenarios. Your care will benefit from it. You might too.

Related Posts with Thumbnails
Care to Share My Stuff?? C'mon, Go ahead.
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • MySpace
  • Twitter
  • Technorati