Skip to content


Trust… It’s everything

Comments

Dooooo Doooooo! Beep Beep Beep Beep Beep Beep Beep  - Attention AMBULANCE ONE, Ambulance One. Respond Code 3. 1234 Anystreet lane, 1234 Anystreet lane for the (Insert Age and Gender Here) patient found unresponsive, unknown if breathing.

Imagine you heard that dispatch go out just now. Imagine you’re at home, off duty, and just happen to be listening to your dispatch channel. Perhaps you’re a volunteer, perhaps you have a scanner, but picture yourself hearing that and realizing… “Oh My God… That’s So-and-So’s house! A (blank) aged Male/Female? That’s gotta be So-And-So!!”

As an EMS person who lives in your district you know the people who work on the service. Now you’re sure you know the patient too. It’s someone you care deeply about and it sounds like they may be in mortal danger. As someone “in the know” you know what you’re going to do next, right? You’re going to listen intently to whatever traffic happens to come out next on the radio, aren’t you?

“Come on, Come on, Come on!” you think to yourself as you wait the agonizing seconds for the crew to acknowledge the page and go enroute to the scene. “What’s taking them so long!?” you ask yourself. “Ambulance 1 is enroute to 1234 Anystreet Lane” says the crew of Ambulance One over the radio. You don’t think that they sound excited enough. They must not know that this is So-and-So! To them, this is just a routine response for an unresponsive patient. They’re going to do a routine, every day job and perform their routine, every day care. They don’t have any idea that this patient is special to you and they’re going to give this patient the same care they’d give anyone else.

Now, since you’re sitting at home and unable to respond, you’re going to be glued to that radio, right? You’re going to know from the voice on the radio exactly who it is that will be taking care of “So-and-So”. You’re going to either be relieved or horrified by your knowledge of who’s on that responding ambulance. If you have trust in the medic on the truck, you’ll feel slightly better about So-and-So’s chances of survival. If you don’t have trust in the medics, you’ll probably feel a lot worse… right?

It’s always been a sticky ethical situation for a healthcare provider at any level to work on someone they know well and care deeply about. Try it just once, or more realistically for an EMS provider, have the situation thrust upon you, and you’ll see that “Stuff gets real” really quick. We have a vested interest in the care that our loved ones receive and while some of us may know that it isn’t always best that we personally be the one caring for them, we all understandably want them to receive the best care possible.

Trusting a provider to care for your special “So-and-So” is a big deal. I’m sure we all have secret mental lists of our colleagues whom we’d want caring for our loved ones and also our lists of who we wouldn’t. It is a supreme responsibility to be a healthcare provider in charge of the care of any patient and I believe that EMTs and Paramedics hold that responsibility every bit as much as or more so than any other healthcare provider. It is a responsibility that I don’t take lightly and one that I hope my colleagues do not either. We are the first people that our patients and their families want to see walk through their door when the unthinkable happens. When the situation is critical, and skilled, complex, time-sensitive care makes the difference between life and death, we are the ones out there doing just that. A good paramedic must be knowledgeable, highly skilled, and experienced to provide that level of care. Not just that, they must do it every time they get in their truck; because every patient is somebody’s “So-and-So”.

Speaking of “stuff getting real” I have to ask you: What kind of provider are you?

Are you out there every day earning the trust of your peers?

Do you work hard enough, study hard enough, and train hard enough?

Do you do your absolute best for every patient, every time?

When it does happen (and it will) that you are sent to care for a colleague’s “So-and-So”, are you the kind of provider they will trust?

If you think about these questions, you know the answers already. If you can honestly say that you’re good enough, I salute you. If not, well then we have some work to do, don’t we?

Earn it. Study hard. Know your stuff. Do your best. Every patient. Every time.

Care to Share My Stuff?? C'mon, Go ahead.
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • MySpace
  • Twitter
  • Technorati

Mental Quickness – Do Smart Alecks Make Better EMTs?

Comments

Alright, I admit it. Driving to work this morning was a bit of a challenge. We had two inches of fresh snow and the tires in my car are in desperate need of replacement. Yes, I drive a Subaru and usually it’s all-wheel drive does awesome in the snow… but I cheaped out on the tires, and they’re honestly a bit mismatched size-wise. Therefore driving it in conditions even remotely slick is hard as heck. I would have driven the SUV and had no problems at all but the wife had to drive the kid to school and then had to drive into the city afterwards and I wanted her to have the safe vehicle. Who cares if I go into the ditch? Work can do without me if they have to, but I need my family to be safe.

Since I think of things to write about when I drive, this morning brought my thoughts to how hard I had to concentrate on the road and the minute adjustments of the steering wheel and the accelerator needed in order to keep the car safely on track. Like everyone who knows about driving in slick conditions, I kept my eyes on the road ahead of me in order to “read” the changes in the road surface before I got to them in order to be ready to quickly make the adjustments needed to keep the car heading in the right direction. See a dark shiny patch? Foot off the gas, be ready to steer slightly away from it when the car slides in that direction. See a pile of snow with a frozen rut running through it? Minutely avoid it if possible and steer into the slide with just enough change in the gas to power through the slide. I made it to work, but I had to call in a favor to have a guy stay over for me for ten minutes. I let him know the night before that he might have to, and I did leave early… but I’m not wrecking the car just so I can save a few moments.

I consider myself a pretty good driver in the snow. In a vehicle with good tires I wouldn’t even worry about anything less than 6 inches this far into the winter season, but today was hard. I’m not patting myself on the back here, because if I would have put good tires on the car in the first place I wouldn’t have been in this position, but isn’t that most of what we do in EMS? We end up using our mental prowess to clean up other people’s messes caused by their lack of planning all the time. Today wasn’t much different. The amount of mental power and concentration needed to keep a car moving forward safely in snow-covered conditions is actually quite staggering when you think of it. You have to make quick observations of rapidly evolving conditions, surmise what you think the presentation of the road surface means to vehicle’s path of travel using your limited observations paired with your past experience and knowledge, and come up with a near simultaneous decision on how to handle the situation ahead of you. If you find yourself to be wrong, based upon the car not reacting the way you want it to, you have to instantaneously correct the situation while adjusting for the conditions ahead… or crash.

Now picture yourself managing a challenging patient presentation, one requiring a handful of pharmacological and physical interventions. You’re pretty much doing the same thing as driving in snow. Just like playing a game of chess, you have to be “thinking a few moves ahead” in order to keep up with what the patient’s physiology is going to throw at you. Do you have a fall victim with a broken hip in need of pain control? Did you think that they’re possibly going to drop their blood pressure with a dose of morphine? Well then you better be ready to give fluid to bump it back up to acceptable levels. However, what if you’re treating a CHF patient that would suffer further from the added fluid? What if they were a patient with Chronic Renal Failure? Would that affect your initial dose of morphine based upon the unknown factor of untoward hypotension? In my Northern system, I’d choose to use Fentanyl over Morphine in that case because of the lessened risk of hypotension, but in my Southern system I’d just have to start with a lower dose of Morphine and slowly titrate to an acceptable level of pain control once I gauged the patient’s response to the med.

How about a patient with a large anteriolateral MI? Their Left Ventricular function is soon to be compromised if not treated in a cath-lab. You need to increase blood flow to the Left Ventricle and decrease overall cardiac work by decreasing afterload with use of nitrates, but that’s going to decrease their cardiac output and blood pressure by decreasing their preload as well. You need to stabilize the infarct as best as possible while maintaining the patient’s hemodynamic state, and you may need to consider supporting their left ventricular function with the use of a vasopressor such as dopamine to treat possible cardiogenic shock. In this case, careful observation of the patient’s presentation and all information available to you is of paramount importance in order to make the minute treatment decisions necessary for your patient’s best possible outcome.

It all comes down to “Mental Quickness” or having the mental prowess and state needed to rapidly intake complex information, process it against your knowledge base, and then make reasonable decisions on a course of action in a very short period of time. We call people who are good at this “Quick Witted” and it applies to myriad situations in daily life. People who are good at this are usually funny, are quick to react to new situations, handle change fairly well, and make darn good EMS providers. I practice by trying to have a joke ready for any situation… so you could also call a person who’s mentally quick a “smart ass”.

You can practice your skills at being mentally quick the same way I do. Use humor and try to make good comebacks to the hooks and barbs that your coworkers and friends throw at you. When we’re sitting around busting each other’s chops… we’re actually practicing our EMS skills, right?

Think about it. Exercise your mind through reading, learning new things, and trying to come up with new ways to think of existing information. You’ll be funnier, more popular, will be able to knock your buddies down a peg better, and will improve your patient care.

Care to Share My Stuff?? C'mon, Go ahead.
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • MySpace
  • Twitter
  • Technorati

“CPR Theatre” – Pediatric Deaths, resuscitations, and futility

Comments

This post is a cooperative joint topic with two widely respected EMS bloggers, Steve Whitehead from Http://www.TheEMTspot.com and Greg Friese, from Http://www.EveryDayEMStips.com – Our topic is supposed to be on why it is that EMTs, Paramedics, and other healthcare providers will sometimes “go through the motions” and continue on with futile resuscitations with pediatric cardiac arrest victims. I’m sure that they will have very insightful posts on the topic, as they always do. Here’s my take.

————————————————————————–

Can someone say “emotionally charged”?

One of the truths about where I’m sitting right now is that I’m chained to a lot of potential responsibility. Today, like a lot of days I’m one of two paramedics on-duty in my service area and the next call is mine. No matter what the next call is, it is my responsibility to get up and answer that call… without regard the horror that fate may be sending me to bear witness to and intervene in. All medics have to accept this inherent part of the job. One of the worst of those possibilities is that it may be a call that involves the significant injury or illness to, or even the death of a child.

Mention the possibility of a child’s death to even the most cynical and seasoned of healthcare providers and you will send a very cold chill down their spine. It’s just horrible. For me, the blessedly rare times that I’ve lost a child have been sentinel events in my life, things that are often thought of but rarely spoken of… almost always spoken of only to comfort the pain of a colleague experiencing the same thing. The loss or suffering of a child just burns into our souls and leaves an indelible scar that only someone who has experienced it can have true empathy for.

And I for one, wish that I didn’t have the empathy that I have for it.

Heaven forbid that I ever have to be one of the parents with pleading eyes at one of those tragic and traumatic scenes. I just can’t imagine what they go through when I’ve said “I’m Sorry”. I can’t imagine their pain, and frankly I don’t want to. As a parent myself the thought is blocked from my conscious mind and relegated only to the deepest recesses of my subconscious fears. Losing an adult patient is one thing, as we humans come to know that our lives are fragile and that our price of admission is to be removed from this existence. It’s a knowledge that we get as we progress through life and gain the experiences, both good and bad, that make us who we are and will become. However, the terrible thought that one could be ripped from us in their age of innocence is an affront to everything that almost everyone holds dear… and it’s more than a lot of us can bear to make the last decision of a child’s life. Instead, we try. We try hard and we keep trying. We hold out hope against thought and fight on, sometimes against futility.

But in my mind, I think I know why it is… because no healthcare person wants to be the person who looks into those pleading eyes and says “I’m sorry”. That decision takes an enormous emotional toll upon the parents and family, of course… but also upon the EMT or Paramedic. It’s ultimately easier on us as EMS people, we reason, to fight on. To race headlong into futility and hold out hope that someone else won’t have to say “I’m sorry”. At least we won’t have to.

There are probably psychological studies out there that I haven’t read that deal with the issue of whether “CPR Theatre” is harmful or helpful to the long-term well being of the surviving family.  These studies are probably well-researched. I took a class once that told me that it was better for family members to be in the resuscitation room inside of a hospital to witness the events as healthcare people try to save their loved ones… and I can understand that I guess. Perhaps it is better to witness that “everything possible was done” for your departed loved one. I don’t know.

As healthcare providers, it is our sworn duty to alleviate suffering as best we can using the tools at our disposal. I, like most of my colleagues, realize that the secondary and tertiary patients that we treat are the family members and their grief reactions to the tragic circumstances that resulted in their calling us. I am reasonably comfortable handling their grief reactions and sadness when an adult passes on scene but I am humbly inadequate to be of much comfort to a parent that has just lost their child no matter how I might try.

My guess that futile CPR theatre can be explained as being more for the parents and families of departed children than it is for the slight chance that we might have missed something. We make the effort in the name of showing to the family members that “everything possible” was indeed done, up to and including running their child lights and sirens to a hospital. I’ll even admit that in the back of the ambulance while I’ve done this, I’ve prayed right along with the family that just perhaps this once we would have a miracle. Never once has it happened.

Here’s a mea culpa for you, even though every time I’ve gone through the motions I’ve said it was for the family…  It may really have been for my own benefit as I’ve stated it could be above. I am a paramedic and I’ve seen my share of pain, but I don’t think that I can look a parent in the eyes and say “I’m sorry” ever again. I just don’t want to and as I write this, I can’t imagine that I could do that and then come back and look the guy in the mirror in the eyes without wondering if maybe this time would’ve been the miracle. I am probably selfish for this practice… but is that wrong?

From a completely actuarial perspective, no futile resuscitation should be performed due to safety concerns and the unnecessary costs involved. I agree that with adults, transporting cardiac arrest victims is probably deadly. I also understand that no ambulance should risk a lights-and-sirens trip to transport a body to the emergency room. However, I am not an actuary. In those cases I’m a witness to horrible emotional pain and I want someone else to be the one who says “I’m sorry”. It’s human nature, perhaps.

In my career, I have told parents “I’m sorry, there’s nothing I can do” in cases where it was blatantly obvious that the child was long beyond hope of any intervention. I’ve done it more than once and I can see the places where I’ve done it in my mind to this day. Sometimes it’s completely obvious that there is indeed nothing that anyone can do. However, occasionally I have indeed known this and just done it anyway. Perhaps it’s completely subjective. Perhaps it was my level of experience and intuition that guided me at the times I’ve made the decision. I’ll tell you this, it certainly wasn’t a decision made from the pages of a textbook.

I don’t have the answers to this. But I do want to go home and hug my kid. My only advice to the EMS people out there is to realize that we’re all human, and that all you have to do is your best. Be compassionate, and use your best judgment. For that’s all we can ever do.

For more on this powerful topic for EMS, head over to Greg Friese’s page and also to Steve Whitehead’s page. You also may want to read “Splashed Sadness – A look at Negative Emotions in EMS” where I further explore the sad side of EMS and our reactions to it.

Care to Share My Stuff?? C'mon, Go ahead.
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • MySpace
  • Twitter
  • Technorati

Paramedics Providing Physicals? Decreasing Healthcare Costs and Improving Care – EMS 2.0

Comments

Sitting down at your station one night finishing paperwork, you’re startled from your daydreaming by a knock at the door. You get up, and answer it to find one of the off-duty firemen from the town standing there at the door. He looks like heck warmed-over. He’s pale, sweaty, and his respiratory rate is elevated. He says He’s “Glad it’s you on tonight” and that he feels worse than he looks. He asks if you can “Check him out” since you’re “all medical and stuff”.

Treating this like a walk-in medical call, you help the guy walk into the back of the ambulance and have him sit on the bench seat. Your fire and EMS departments aren’t connected so you’re not really on a first name basis with the guy, but you know him from sight and know him from seeing him around the town on calls and social things and such. He just looks sick, he says that he’s having a bit of trouble breathing and that he feels like he’s freezing one minute and hot the next. He also says that he’s been coughing up “all kinds of stuff” for the last few days.

Putting on your best caring EMS provider face, you begin your assessment. He’s a 26yo Male patient in generally good health and with good appearance other than for right now. His skin is very warm and moist to the touch and he seems to have a fever. His pulse is rapid and bounding at around 120bpm, but that decreases after a few minutes of rest as does his respirations. He states that for the last few days he’s been sick. It started with a sore throat and some sinus gook and now has “gotten into his chest”. You listen to his lungs and hear some diminished sounds in the bases bilaterally with diffuse rhonchi throughout.  His abdomen is soft and non-tender but says that he’s had some mild bouts of diarrhea. He complains of exertional dyspnea and his BP is way high at 184/98. His temperature is 101.4 degrees F taken at the tympanic membrane.

So based upon the assessment, you’re thinking that he’s got a respiratory infection, probably bronchitis. Just because you can, you run a 12-lead EKG which is otherwise normal other than for the sinus tachycardia. His pulse ox is 94% on room air. He says that he doesn’t have insurance and that he can’t afford the emergency room, but that he’s willing to pay for a visit to the urgent care doctor if you think he should go in.

Now, faced with the above, as I have been a few times in my career, you have a few options here. You could do what we’re supposed to do by the book and recommend transport to the ER even though you know the guy’s condition probably isn’t life threatening right now. You could also tell him that you think that he may have a respiratory infection and that while he should see the doctor as soon as he can, that he probably doesn’t need the emergency room.

(Remember, we’re talking about today’s protocols, not the ones I want that I posted in “The Current US Economy and EMS – An In-depth look at how this mess will affect 911 in your community”)

Usually, I choose to tell my buddies that they should consult their regular doctors or go to an urgent care clinic instead of going to the ER. Sure, in cases where I thought they had a life threat or needed immediate care above the level of the local Urgent Care, I’ve transported my friends a few times. However, most of the time I give them my assessment findings written down on a piece of paper, hand them a copy of their EKG if I took one, and send them on their way to the non-ER doctor.

The last time I did this, it hit me: I’m conducting a physical when I do this. Sure, in the above case and in the cases where I’ve done this before it is a complaint-based assessment, but a patient examination is a physical exam. When I write my assessment findings on a sheet to give to the doctor, I’m writing them on a physical examination form. While my assessment isn’t as in depth as that of a physician, it certainly is better than not being examined, and a paramedic has specific training in detecting disease processes that may go undetected by a patient and their families.

(Note: In all of the cases where I did not transport the patient to the hospital, I did obtain a proper refusal form after educating the patient about their condition as best I could. They made the decision, not me.)

If you type “Annual Physical Exam” into Google, you’ll see quite a few articles about the topic, including a study published in the Archives of Internal Medicine and this article published in US News and World Report basically, they say that Preventative Health Exams account for approximately 8.0% of all ambulatory care visits costing approximately $7.8 billion in health care costs. They also say that the cost of providing these services may outweigh the benefits of receiving them. In 2005, a survey of 800 Primary Care Physicians reported that 65% of them recommended an annual physical, that 74% felt that it improved early detection of illness, and that 94% felt that it improved patient-physician relationships, there is currently “No major North-American clinical medical association” that “currently recommends that health adults get a physical each year.”

So there’s a debate being held in healthcare circles. On one hand, patients probably perceive a benefit to the annual physical exam, and certainly the people who have disease processes detected and stopped with early intervention see a very tangible benefit. There are also a majority of physicians that when questioned individually state that they see a benefit to the exam. However, there is also the fact that the costs probably outweigh the benefit of the exam, even though “preventative care” is batted about in the current healthcare debate quite a bit and most organizations and physicians recommend health screenings for specific disease processes that benefit most from early detection.

My opinion is that when the cost outweighs a benefit, there is the choice to either forgo the benefit or find a way to decrease the cost. I am suggesting that we can decrease the cost to the overall healthcare system as well as increase the availability of preventive care by introducing paramedics into the debate. I believe that paramedics could provide a more than adequate annual physical examination in most cases for a large subset of the population. In fact, most of us probably already do without thinking about it. The articles state that 80% of preventive health care is provided within the context of complaint-based ambulatory care visits. I would say that paramedics in ambulances provide this care to the rest of the population. I’d also say that we provide a lot more patient education on chronic health issues to a larger segment of the underserved population than any other healthcare provider. Think about it, how many times have you personally attended to a patient who called you for a complaint such as a “fall” and upon assessment found evidence of an undiagnosed chronic condition? I have, and I like to think that with a thorough assessment on every patient, I can improve their overall health more so than just helping them with their current complaint.

To implement this plan, I would think that functionally, paramedic training already gives us a strong background to provide a detailed physical exam. We would, however, have to undergo more intensive training in examination skills and pathophysiology to be able to detect subtle underlying signs and symptoms of disease processes, mental health and substance abuse issues, and sexual health problems. I would envision that there would be a detailed and formalized set of procedures, tests, and paperwork that would be completed in full that should be pre-agreed upon with the Primary Care Physicians in an ambulance service’s wider sphere of influence. Tests such as a random fingerstick glucose, a monitor strip, and a baseline 12-lead EKG could be obtained as well as a review of the patient’s social and other risk-factors. These findings would then be forwarded to the patient’s personal physician, or could be given to the patient to bring to a physician of their choosing.

This is an easily implemented service that we could be providing our communities with tomorrow with the right planning. The chance to improve the overall health of our patients exists coupled with a chance to decrease overall healthcare costs. It’s also another potential revenue source for ambulance services, which is sorely needed in order to implement EMS 2.0 and improve the EMS profession for tomorrow. Imagine the revenue boost to your service’s and your bottom line if every crew started performing ten physicals a day for $50 a pop. It’s a bargain for the patient, but would be a boon for us.

Paramedics are underutilized for our skill sets and education, this is a way that we can further contribute to the health of our communities while improving our profession overall.

References:

US News and World ReportDo You Actually Need a Physical Exam”http://health.usnews.com/articles/health/2007/09/24/do-you-actually-need-a-physical-exam.html

Archives of Internal Medicine “Preventive Health Examinations and Preventive Gynecological Examinations in the United States” – http://archinte.ama-assn.org/cgi/content/abstract/167/17/1876

Care to Share My Stuff?? C'mon, Go ahead.
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • MySpace
  • Twitter
  • Technorati

Everyday EMS Ethics – Thoughts on Ethical Behavior in EMS

Comments

Everyday EMS Ethics? Where do I get my authority to talk about anything ethical? I’m definitely not a perfect person. I’ve made some decisions that I’m not proud of in this life, I’m human, and I’m certainly not immune to the mud that life can sling on a person. How then can I talk about ethics with a straight face, knowing that I’ve made some of the very mistakes that I seem to be condemning?

It’s because that just like everyone else, I have the ability to feel good or bad about anything that happens to me and anyone else, I have the ability to introspect and wonder why my gut feels the way it does about something, I also have the ability to want to be a better, more ethical person. As silly as it seems in this world sometimes, striving to be a better person on this journey we call life is what we all must do as we edge closer to “Point B” in our path.

The omnipresent “they” have always told me that “Being a good person means doing the right thing even when nobody’s looking” and I like that phrase. If a lot more people took that view, I think that the world could improve overnight. Imagine if everyone did the “right” thing all the time? We’d have no crime, no “half-assed” jobs, and everyone would get along, right?

Well no, probably not. Of course things would improve and crime would cut down, but since two perfectly ethical people can have logical disagreements on the same issue, we’d still have discord and differences of opinion. We’re all still human and human beings have different thoughts, feelings, emotions, and standards of right and wrong. Therefore, when one throws out the term “Ethics” it seems to draw a lot of shrugs from people who aren’t looking for the conflict it can generate, or who simply aren’t looking to put forth the effort to debate their positions effectively.

Grey areas abound in any discussion involving ethics, but I think that it can be simplified. Even in an area where lives are literally on the line such as in EMS or other healthcare disciplines, the realm of ethics can be summed up in the above phrase about doing the right thing when nobody’s looking and with the application of the Golden Rule, the one about doing unto others as you would have others do unto you.

Of course, that’s not always easy as it sounds, is it? People are motivated by different things and behaving ethically in one situation may justify behavior that may be considered unethical in another. For example, take the case where a family’s breadwinner has to make more income to feed his/her family at home and that need justifies taking more overtime at work than would normally be considered his/her “share” of the OT and the extra income that it brings. The breadwinner’s coworkers may consider the person to be an “overtime hog” and may think that he/she is behaving unethically whereas the breadwinner may feel that the need to feed his family with the extra OT income justifies his taking more OT than is his/her share. Who would be “right” here? If everyone had a family at home that they were supporting with the extra income from the OT, it wouldn’t be ethical for that one person to take more than their proper percentage of the OT… but would it be right if everyone else was a single person with no families to support? Who would decide that?

We have to be unafraid to discuss the grey areas and tailor solutions to fit the unique situations we face. Discussion among rational adults can help guide the actions of the group towards a more ethical and equitable organization, which makes everyone happier in the end. Some organizations discourage this, and instead make overarching rules that discourage the rational adults within those organizations from free thought that would benefit the overall operations, and some are too lax and instead encourage unethical behavior by never sanctioning those who engage in it.

On political topics, I’ve always liked the words of a country song that state “You’ve got to stand for something or you’ll fall for anything” meaning that a person has got to have a set of values and beliefs based upon their own moral compass and introspection in order to guide their decision making when faced with an overwhelming amount of information.  And we’re all overwhelmed. I firmly believe that human beings can only process so much information and that there is no possible way for any human being to be well-enough informed on every issue to form a truly solid and rational opinion. Therefore, when we hear something, if we judge it based upon our foundation of core beliefs, we have a way to gauge how we feel about it. For example, I’ll bet that if any, only a small percentage of the people who read this post have ever studied the effects of globalization on the food supply in Micronesia. Sure, we could research the issue, but our core beliefs most probably would tell us that anything that decreases affordable food for the majority of the population is bad. My guess is that this opinion on the issue is perfectly fine and I don’t have the time to put in the requisite study to find out otherwise. This can be applied to EMS almost daily. I believe that a thorough assessment and judicious application of treatment modalities benefits the highest number of patients. I believe that any amount of study time that I put in learning about pathophysiology enables me to better assess my patients and judiciously apply treatment to them. Therefore, I can ethically and logically assume that putting in one hour of study time per day on pathophysiology is a good thing.

Of course, if there were to be a study that came out unequivocally showing that 45 minutes per day is the optimal number and that one hour actually causes degradation in knowledge through um, brain fatigue or something, then my opinion would be wrong… but nobody has studied this topic with enough depth to be sure of that.

Here’s what it comes down to for little ole imperfect me: “Shower Guilt”. I usually say that when I make decisions it’s because I have to look myself in the mirror and shave every morning but that’s honestly not where it gets me. My conscience rears its head during my morning shower. If I’ve done something that I don’t feel deep-down is ethical, my “Shower Guilt” kicks in and I beat myself up for it. I usually can tell how I’m doing by how rough my showers are. It’s been that way for years for me and I’m thankful for it. The introspective time has made me a better, more rounded person.

I guess what I’m saying with this post, and with my whole Everyday EMS Ethics series is that ethical issues must be discussed in a positive, adult manner for progress to be made. When people look at problems or violations in ethical standards in a rational and objective manner, solutions come out that go beyond heavy-handed rule spewing and approach the realm of positive resolution and healthy growth. By maintaining an open dialogue, others participating and observing the dialogue can glean lessons that will allow them to make more ethical decisions in their own lives and professional situations. Ethical behavior encourages others to behave ethically. Discussing the ethical standards of a group in a positive and uplifting manner makes people within the group feel good about doing the “right” thing.

Paramedics and EMTs face heavy ethical questions in our day to day work. It’s in our job description.

What does your organization do to encourage ethical behavior?

Care to Share My Stuff?? C'mon, Go ahead.
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • MySpace
  • Twitter
  • Technorati

Uh oh, is it that time again? EMS Recert Time Cometh…

Comments

I’ll betcha that a lot of you reading this are in the same boat that I am… Here’s the reminder!

Yesterday I had the occasion to pull out all of my various certification cards and licenses, photocopy them, and turn them in to one of my departments for verification that I still had them. Much to my chagrin I noticed that it is indeed that time again… the time for me to start gathering up all of my hard-won continuing education hours and credits, compiling them into packets, and begin sending them off to the various places that I hold licensure through.

So let’s see… that’s Illinois, Iowa, Wisconsin, and the National Registry of EMTs. Actually, the Illinois license is on a 4 year schedule, so this is an off period for them. Thank goodness for small favors. Unfortunately though, I also noticed that my ACLS card expires this month and I hadn’t noticed it till now. Now I have to frantically find a class to sit through and get me some learnin’ at. Here’s hoping it’s not like the last time I took the class… It was horrible. Since I had let my card expire by, ahem, a “short amount of time” (3 months) I had to take the full class. Worse yet, the only class I could find happened to be when one of the big hospitals near me was pushing through a bunch of OB/Peds nurses through the class so that they could accept regular med/surg patients on their units. The nurses, suffice to say, were less than thrilled to be there and answered most of the questions with “I don’t know, what does the Doctor order me to do?” The instructor, who was also a nurse, actually accepted that answer for most of the questions. Really. I listened to them give waaay off the wall answers that were accepted as correct by the instructor.

I don’t think any one of them has ever been in charge of a code resuscitation… at least not a successful one. But I digress.

The State of Wisconsin EMS bureau has been changing the rules for renewing your licensure quite a lot this year. Frankly, I don’t quite understand what I have to do as of yet but I’m working on finding it out. As far as I know right now I have to take a “refresher” program. I *think* that by completing a National Registry refresher program I will be fine. Feel free, however, if you’re in the know for Wisconsin EMS renewals, to set me straight on this in the comments section. It’s kinda important for my livelihood.

My Iowa EMS license is much easier. All I do is send them in the exact photocopied packet I send in to the NREMT, fill out a short little form, and a few weeks later I get a shiny new license in the mail. Thank you State of Iowa EMS! Keep Being Awesome!

For the National Registry, I’ve heard faint rumblings about this whole “Computer test based” renewal program. It sounds cool, from what I’ve heard… but I’d have to do the exact same CE for my Wisconsin and Iowa licenses and I wouldn’t get the CE bump I need for the 4 year Illinois license. So much for that, then.

Lucky for me, there’s an awesome NREMT recert class they put on in Davenport, IA. I’m heading out that way to get me some high-quality learning and have me a little bit of fun as well. Thanks EICC and MEDIC EMS!

This post doesn’t have much of a message to it other than for me to gripe about having to yet again put all of this stuff through. I am all for education, and I research EMS stuff nearly every day, but unfortunately I haven’t thought of a way yet to translate stuff I learn from my colleagues on the EMS blogosphere and the other sites on the interwebz into hard Continuing Education credits. Maybe I’ll spearhead that issue too once I get time. Maybe…

Care to Share My Stuff?? C'mon, Go ahead.
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • MySpace
  • Twitter
  • Technorati

Education vs Training: The “Professional Ambulance Cleaner”

Comments

Imagine if you will this hypothetical scenario:

You and your roommate have just graduated EMT school together and go to work at competing ambulance companies in the same city. He works for HIS ambulance service, and you work for YOUR ambulance service. Both services have similar fleets, similar deployment patterns, and similar call-volumes. In fact, there’s really no way to tell them apart other than the fact that the HIS ambulance service uniforms are sickly green jumpsuits, and YOUR ambulance uniforms are Macho Blue Shirts with navy blue pants.

You both go off for your first day on the job which understandably includes several hours of training on company policies. For both of you, the whole day turns out to be a long class on how to clean the inside of ambulances.

Here’s the differences, though. At YOUR ambulance, you learn about the biological functions of bacteria and viruses. You learn their strengths, their weaknesses, how they reproduce on inanimate environmental surfaces, how they create biofilms to increase their reproductive capabilities and life span, and how pervasive they are in randomized samples from real-life ambulances. You learn how grime collects in the ambulances, how it adheres to the surfaces that you will be cleaning, and what the various types of substances are that you will most commonly find in real-world applications. The whole first day is spent on nothing but learning about dirt, grime, and germs and how they contaminate ambulance interiors. They even threw in the types of materials that the ambulance interior is made from and what the specific dirt-holding and germ-breeding properties of each material are. You see samples and scenarios pertaining to germ and dirt proliferation on ambulance interiors.

Not only that, there’s homework, reading material, and a report due the next day.

The second day that you report to YOUR ambulance service, you learn all about different types of cleaning products, tools, and disinfectants. You learn how to properly choose the detergent needed for optimum dirt-dissolving power on what type of surfaces you may have to clean; You learn the proper disinfectant to choose for each type of commonly encountered bacteria, virus, and fungi spore; and you learn the proper contact times to leave each product on for optimal disinfection and/or dirt dissolving power. Then you learn about every different type of sponge, mop, rag, fabric, and tool used to clean the ambulances. You spend a few hours in the laboratory they have testing out the material and performing experiments in the name of learning.

Oh, and after that day too, there’s a lot of homework and reading material.

Your roommate, on the other hand, went to work and found out that he too had to learn about ambulance cleaning. He learned that they also expect clean ambulances, however his choices and training are much simpler. He is told to clean the ambulance using two bottles: One marked “Cleaner” and the other marked “Germ Killer”. He is given ten rags and is told to clean the ambulance for inspection by the owner of the company using the tools given in the time allowed. He does so and is told “Good, now do it again tomorrow”. The next day, he again cleans the ambulances using the tools and training provided, and is again told “You did a good job”

In the above scenario, the first ambulance service, “YOUR Ambulance, uses a form of advanced education to teach their people how properly to clean the ambulances to their specifications. The education is rigorous and in-depth.

At “HIS Ambulance” they use training, and vocational experience to teach their employees how to properly clean the ambulances.

Here’s some questions I have:

  1. Which ambulance service do you think will have cleaner ambulances in the long run?
  2. Which employee do you think will do an overall better job in cleaning the ambulances?
  3. Which employer, “YOUR Ambulance” or “HIS Ambulance” do you think has the better philosophy?
  4. Which ambulance cleaning class will result in the better, more motivated, happier employee?

Anyone else see the relationship to EMS training/education here? Which one results in a more “Professional Ambulance Cleaner” that is better equipped to handle the job?

Care to Share My Stuff?? C'mon, Go ahead.
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • MySpace
  • Twitter
  • Technorati

Cardiocerebral Resuscitation – Change brings Fantastic results

Comments

Hold on to your brains here people, because I’m about to blow your mind. 

With new research comes new treatment modalities, and with new treatment modalities comes a change in our profession’s very foundation. This change is hard to accept and hard to convince others to implement, but it is necessary for us to do so. 

I’m talking here about CCR, or Cardiocerebral Resuscitation. Hold on, because it’s coming, it’s fantastic, and it will shake the very timbers of our profession.

 First off, if you don’t know what I’m talking about, here are some things you should read first. Go ahead and read them, then come back and read this. I’ll give you a teaser on why you should read forward:

40% – 60% resuscitation rates are possible in witnessed V-Fib cardiac arrests.

 Is that enough incentive for you?

 First, go visit: Http://www.CallandPump.org to read about the ongoing research project.

 Then, read my first post on CCR: Advances in Resuscitation – CCR, if you’re not doing it now, you will be”

Follow the links on that post to see the article outlining the research project and the subsequent article published in the Annals of Emergency Medicine.

 Did you read them? Good.

 So here are some things you should know about CCR.

 It’s about moving blood – Good compressions make all the difference. Press hard, press fast (100 compressions per minute) and switch out compressors every 1 minute. Yes, do this even though you’re going to complain that I “don’t know how it goes in the field”. Yes, I do because I’m a practicing paramedic with a decade or so of experience and two full-time EMS jobs. I know it’s hard and unwieldy, but the results are almost magical.

 When I first became a CPR instructor for AHA some years ago, I taught my students, incorrectly, that chest compressions were all about compressing the heart between the sternum and the spine. It turns out that I was wrong. The point of effective compressions is to vary total intrathorascic pressure creating both a positive total pressure that forces blood out of every vascular space and organ in the chest including the heart and aorta and also then creating a negative total pressure to pull blood back inside. The more blood you can get flowing, the higher pressure you create in the arteries moving blood through the vascular system and perfusing the heart and the brain. By continuing compressions, you boost the arterial pressure higher to the point where it will perfuse the heart and the brain adequately to maintain some amount of metabolism and prevent some cellular necrosis. When you stop, even for a few seconds, the pressure falls to almost nothing and must be worked back up to the level needed to provide some perfusion of the critical organs. 100 compressions per minute isn’t a request, it’s a mandate if you wish your patient to survive. Switch out compressors every one minute. We’re human beings and we’re fallible. It’s been shown that we cannot maintain adequate compressions for more than a minute. Pop on your ETCo2 monitor and watch the number fall after one person does compressions for longer than that and you’ll believe me.

 Transport is deadly – One of the tenants of CCR is that every intervention that interrupts compressions must be proven to be of more benefit than continued perfusion of the heart and brain. If we are to maintain adequate compressions to continue this perfusion until the heart restarts and begins moving blood on its own, we must not move the patient from a hard, level surface. One of the biggest interruptions of compressions is the act of moving and readying the patient for transport. We jostle them around, put them on a narrow cot, bounce them from wherever they fell, load them into the ambulance, and then bounce them along the road to the ER. All of this decreases arterial pressures by negatively impacting our ability to adequately compress and also by limiting our ability to effectively compress and increase intrathorascic pressures to the extent possible. Therefore, transporting the patient is deadly because it harms our ability to resuscitate our patients.

 Of course I want you to take them to the hospital eventually (hopefully once they’re resuscitated) just don’t be so eager to get them there. Work the patient where you find them. You’ll do your best work on scene and will be pleased with the results.

Be prepared to use more and less common medications – How many medications do you carry on your trucks? One service I work for that doesn’t use the new CCR protocols carries 6 prefilled syringes of Epinephrine 1:10000 on the trucks. Let’s see… One Epi every 3-5minutes x 6 syringes equals 18-30 minutes of epinephrine for the arrests we run. I put the officers on notice that I will be needing a second truck to respond to codes that I attend. In addition, since more patients are being resuscitated, the need to practice post-resuscitative care is increased. Be prepared to hang antiarrythmic drips. Be prepared to hang dopamine. Practice caring for patients post resuscitation. You may want to consider researching induced hypothermia to mitigate reperfusion injury to the heart and brain.

Also, remember that Vasopressin and Amiodarone are in the AHA ACLS protocols. Does your service use them?

Approach cardiac arrest with a clear game plan – If you’re in the emergency services, you should be familiar with the Incident Command System, or ICS. Resuscitations should be no different. One person is the “Code Commander”, one person is the “CPR Sector Officer” and so forth. Train on these like you would train for any other major incident and watch your success rates climb.

I’ll be posting more on this in the coming days. I’m really excited about CCR and the possibilities that it holds for our patients and our profession. You will be too, trust me

Care to Share My Stuff?? C'mon, Go ahead.
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • MySpace
  • Twitter
  • Technorati

A Motivational EMS Article Geared towards Newer EMTs

Comments

The following article is what I submitted to my Fire/Rescue/EMS department’s monthly newsletter for this month’s EMS column. It has a readership of every one of the the 110 or so members of the department, their families, and a good percentage of the 30k or so people in our district. They know me personally as someone who (Imagine this) likes EMS.

If you like this article, feel free to steal it and use it for your purposes. All I ask is that you keep the links intact and give byline credit. Shoot a comment to me too so I can see if it indeed does go anywhere.

Oh, and here’s a thought. If you would like a short EMS related piece to put into your department’s newsletter, shoot me an e-mail at proems1@yahoo.com I’ll be happy to come up with something.

————————————–

It’s well known around the department that I like the ambulances and EMS in general. I do, and I’ve always been proud to be a part of (My Department’s) EMS program. I think that the level of dedication and professionalism in our department is second to none and that our program is certainly one of the best in the region and in the state.

With that said, in EMS there is never a time to slow down and rest on our laurels. The science that drives our brand of medicine is constantly evolving and the only constant is change. In my EMS career, I’ve seen “The Right Thing to Do” for my patients change more times than I thought possible. Continuing education, reinforcing the basics, and studying the latest research is key in keeping oneself in step with how best to care for our patients. As with any community based Emergency Medical Services provider, our citizens are our families, neighbors, and friends. We have the responsibility of being the first line of defense against the very worst times in peoples’ lives and it is our duty to be at our best when we are called to make a difference. The people we care about most are depending on us.

Just as in firefighting, in EMS, the little things make the biggest difference. It really is the Basic Life Support care that makes everything else work and our calls run the smoothest. Patients do not necessarily perceive the skillful application of Advanced Techniques or medications given to them, but they certainly appreciate the attention given to treatment of their ABCs, their comfort on the cot, pain relief and stabilization through proper splinting techniques, the compassion of the care providers, and the cleanliness of our ambulances and equipment. It has been said that “Perception is Reality”, meaning that the way someone perceives you or your organization affects their own reality. In EMS, good perception actually has been shown to provide for better patient outcomes. Really, if you have more confidence in the skill or effectiveness of your medical provider or a technique, you’re statistically more likely to have a better outcome.

It is so important for us as healthcare providers to focus on providing the best care possible for our current patients, but also to keep an eye out for future patients. Start now by making sure that the ambulance is thoroughly cleaned at the start of every day and after every call. Make sure that your equipment is ready to go and that you’re an expert in its use. Read something educational every day to keep yourself in the right mindset and to keep your skills sharp. Pull things out and practice with them. Come up with questions to ask the more experienced providers and don’t be afraid to ask them. It is every EMTs duty to become an expert in prehospital care and you are the only one who can expand your knowledge enough to become one. Study every day.

Here are some resources I use every day, they teach me something every time I use them:

-          Http://www.happymedic.com – A San Francisco Firefighter/Paramedic and his adventures in EMS.

-          Http://www.999medic.com – A British paramedic working EMS with our neighbors across the pond.

-          Http://www.theEMTspot.com – Educational tidbits, tips, and tricks from a Colorado Paramedic.

-          Http://www.EveryDayEmsTips.com – A Social Media, training, and EMS guru with daily tips to improve your care.

-          Http://paramedicine101.blogspot.com – In-Depth Educational Articles for EMS providers.

-          Http://www.LifeUnderTheLights.com – Your’s Truly’s random musings on the EMS.

Of course, getting your hands on a copy of JEMS or EMS Magazine is great too. Learn something every day, take pride in yourself, your service, and the care you provide. Your next patient could be your loved one, make sure they’d get care that you’d be proud to give them.

Care to Share My Stuff?? C'mon, Go ahead.
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • MySpace
  • Twitter
  • Technorati

Advances in Resuscitation – CCR If you’re not doing it now, you will be

Comments

Visitors to my old blog probably know that at my ambulance service we tend to bring back a lot of codes. I talk about it a lot. Back in 2004 our medical director, Dr. Michael Kellum, got us involved in a “Demonstration Project” to bring Continuous Compression CPR or Cardiocerebral resuscitation to a rural area. Since that time, the results have been more than dramatic. Depending on what statistics you look at, we may be “Saving” almost 50% of witnessed arrests found to be in ventricular fibrillation.

It’s all explained at Http://www.callandpump.org But if you want to go right to the whitepaper that explains what we do, why we do it, and how it’s done then you want to go here: http://callandpump.org/assets/Proposal_Current.pdf – This link is explains the demonstration project initiated by Dr. Kellum et al. in the two county area that I work in. This paper was published in 2004 at the beginning of the project.

This is a link to the results published in the Annals of Emergenc Medicine in 2008 – http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18374452?ordinalpos=2&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_DefaultReportPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum 

You may be interested in this part:

“RESULTS: In the 3 years preceding the change in protocol, there were 92 witnessed arrests with an initially shockable rhythm. Eighteen patients survived (20%) and 14 (15%) were neurologically intact. During the 3 years after implementation of the new protocol, there were 89 such patients. Forty-two (47%) survived and 35 (39%) were neurologically intact. CONCLUSION: In adult patients with a witnessed cardiac arrest and an initially shockable rhythm, implementation of an out-of-hospital treatment protocol based on the principles of cardiocerebral resuscitation was associated with a dramatic improvement in neurologically intact survival.”

This is good stuff. Remember, the above is only reflective of those included in the study, who are “Witnessed arrest(s) with an initially shockable rhythm”. Anecdotally, I’ve personally attended those that were not in a shockable rhythm and witnessed greater effectiveness as well.

Here’s the short version of our protocols for Witnessed V-Fib Arrest: (and for those of you who want more, email me at: proems1@yahoo.com and I will be happy to send you a copy of the protocols)

We follow an acronym called MCMAID in our resuscitation protocols, it stands for:

Metronome – We carry a metronome in our monitor/defibrillator bags that clicks out at 100 beats per minute. We are to compress at 100bpm. No more, no less. This metronome keeps us on rhythm and reminds us to be on the chest.

Compressions – 100 compressions per minute. Do not stop. Initially, we are to administer 200 compressions (2 minutes) before our first shock. We are to limit any interruptions in compressions absolutely as much as possible, charging our defibrillators while compressions are ongoing, and recognizing V-fib through the compressions if possible. Compress hard and deep, completely releasing tension on the chest upon recoil to maximize the compression and decompression of the chest.

Monitor – Place the monitor on the patient using fast patches. Do not stop the 200 compression cycles to determine the rhythm. Shock at max joules biphasic. If you can anticipate V-Fib, charge the defib during the compressions and only stop long enough to clear for the shock. Don’t check the pulse, get right back to compressions.

Airway – Initially, a BLS airway will be placed in the patient and a non-rebreather oxygen mask will be placed on the patient. If the airway must be controlled by more advanced means to protect and ensure a patent airway, now is the time to do so.

Intravenous Access – Most of the time, this is accomplished through the means of the Ez-IO drill that we carry and love. (See: Alternative Circulatory Access Strategies – Hi Ho IO) This can also be obtained through peripheral or EJ IV access.

Drugs – Epinephrine 1:10,000 1mg IVasopression 40 IU, Amiodarone 300mg, then Epinephrine 1:10,000 1mg q 3-5min. If refractory, we may give an additional 150mg Amiodarone IV.

To see the full MCMAID protocol (I put it up in a post) you can see it by clicking here.

Today Dr. Kellum came down again for our monthly training and let us know the latest breakthroughs and orders in the project. He is stressing the importance of End-Tidal CO2 (ETCO2) monitoring and states that no pulse check is necessary without a spontaneous increase in ETCO2. He expects every intubated (or combitubed) patient to have ETCO2 monitoring in place.

He also expects that we will monitor ETCO2 readings as a way to prove effectiveness of compressions. Rescuers who cannot get ETCO2 readings consistent with other personnel when providing compressions shouldn’t be doing compressions.

Rescuers should switch off compressions EVERY ONE MINUTE whenever possible. This is providing some fantastic results in preliminary trials.

He also stated that the effectiveness of the CCR protocols are showing a marked increase in refractory V-fib. He hinted that the protocols might soon show a need for thrombolytic use in treatment of refractory V-Fib.

Stay tuned folks, I am happy as heck to be included in this. I will bring updates, with permission, as many times as I get them.

Related Posts with Thumbnails
Care to Share My Stuff?? C'mon, Go ahead.
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • MySpace
  • Twitter
  • Technorati